Slashdot Mirror


European Parliament Committee Endorses End-To-End Encryption (tomshardware.com)

The civil liberties committee of the European Parliament has released a draft proposal "in direct contrast to the increasingly loud voices around the world to introduce regulations or weaken encryption," according to an anonymous Slashdot reader. Tom's Hardware reports: The draft recommends a regulation that will enforce end-to-end encryption on all communications to protect European Union citizens' fundamental privacy rights. The committee also recommended a ban on backdoors. Article 7 of the E.U.'s Charter of Fundamental Rights says that E.U. citizens have a right to personal privacy, as well as privacy in their family life and at home. According to the EP committee, the privacy of communications between individuals is also an important dimension of this right...

We've lately seen some EU member states push for increased surveillance and even backdoors in encrypted communications, so there seems to be some conflict here between what the European Parliament institutional bodies may want and what some member states do. However, if this proposal for the new Regulation on Privacy and Electronic Communications passes, it should significantly increase the privacy of E.U. citizens' communications, and it won't be so easy to roll back the changes to add backdoors in the future.

Security researcher Lukasz Olejnik says "the fact that policy is seriously considering these kind of aspects is unprecedented."

12 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Children by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone thinking of the children as much as some politicians should be under surveillance, we might have a pedo lurking.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. The people by tsa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't it amazing how the EU time and time again installs regulation that benefits the people who live there, even if that means going against companies best interests? And still many inhabitants of the EU think they don't benefit from it (although those numbers are going down thanks to Brexit).

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:The people by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The EU is not one voice or a single point of power in government. EU mechanisms have been used to push through oppressive surveillance and recording laws as well. It's a complicated issue and there are people on both sides of the debate, in the EU administration just as anywhere else in politics.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    2. Re:The people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This has nothing to do with "companies best interest", or maybe you should argue it is in the best interest of the companies.

      Strong encryption is in everyones interest, except for politicians with a appetite for totalitarianism. Backdoors etc would be a complete disaster, as amply demonstrated by Intel quite recently.

    3. Re:The people by johannesg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is only a draft proposal. By the time it gets through the commission it may (and likely, will) read like the exact opposite.

      Oh, and "Time and time again" -> give one more example please?

    4. Re:The people by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The civil liberties committee of the European Parliament

      should be making recommendations for legislation like this.

      Getting the entire wishlist passed into law may be unlikely, but at least they're having the conversation. Naturally, there will be some dissent from other factions of government, powerful business interests, and the "if-you-have-nothing-to-hide" parrots. Still, this is a representative committee doing the people's business as it was intended to function.

      It's refreshing. Far too many government oversight departments have been hamstrung (and empowered) by the whim of the party in power.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re:The people by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fact that the EU even has a department looking at civil liberties, which is taken seriously and results in strong privacy and freedom protections, is quite remarkable these days.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. Re:Children by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of us are thinking of the children. We don't think any child should grow up in an authoritarian regime, afraid of their own government, hesitant about having an open mind and communicating honestly with their peers.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  4. Re:What? by fazig · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hey, it's only meant to protect E.U. citizens. They didn't say anything about the smelly sand people that aren't true Europeans to begin with.

    (beware of sarcasm)

  5. Re:What? by Jack+Malmostoso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    True, but right now even if the UK were to complain about this resolution they would be ignored.

    They are not out yet, but they have lost their voice already.

  6. Re: Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    That's easy to answer: the alternative was Hillary. People rather vote for someone like Trump than for a competent totalitarian like Hillary. Did that answer your question?

  7. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The effects are starting to be felt, and parts of the government are already hinting about the damage of leaving the EU. Hell, they've even admitted that an extremely good deal is needed otherwise the NHS is screwed. The EU provides support to some of the poorest areas of the UK, ironically the same ones that had the heaviest Leave votes. We're already seeing a backlash now people realise they're going to be out of pocket if we leave - the anti-EU Democratic Unionist Party is already scrounging for cash to replace lost EU funding a part of its deal to keep the Conservatives in power.

    I give things until the end of the year, before Brexit collapses and we can hopefully go back to tackling the real issues that affect the UK. I was out canvassing during the election, and it was incredible how many people voted to leave and now regret it. The surge in support for Labour came from those people.

    Lets face it, if we do leave then the UK population is going to quickly discover that the government and media are the cause of most of our social and economic problems, not the EU.