Slashdot Mirror


'Older Fathers Have Geekier Sons' (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader shares a BBC article: Men who delay starting a family are more likely to have "geekier" sons, a study suggests. They were brighter, more focused and less bothered about fitting in -- according to the "Geek Index" devised by King's College London. The mother's age had no impact, and daughters seemed to be immune. One scientist said a trend for delayed parenthood might mean we were heading towards a "society of geniuses" able to solve the world's problems. The findings are rare good news in the science of delayed fatherhood. Repeated studies have shown that older sperm is more prone to genetic errors and children are more likely to develop autism and schizophrenia.

81 of 145 comments (clear)

  1. "Good news" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Followed immediately by pointing out that men over 45 are virtually guaranteed to have autistic children.

    1. Re:"Good news" by TWX · · Score: 1

      I can actually refer to my own extended family as a bit of a case-study, my paternal grandparents had 17 children, eight of them boys. Dad was the last one, when Grandpa was 56 or so. There's no autism in the family, and Grandpa was a farmer and then retired-farmer when Dad was growing up, so it wasn't like he passed-on any particularly geeky habits or hobbies.

      The later males did progressively better in their incomes and in having technical careers the further along, when discounting the first son, who ended up in the military (Army I think) during the occupation of Germany post-WWII and during the consolidation of NATO. The next couple remained farmers, after that they ended up in manufacturing, then argibusness, then finally my own father with his degree in computer science. And no, his father didn't pay for his education, so it wasn't a matter that as Grandpa approached his later years he used any extra funds to put his youngest boy through college that he couldn't do for the others.

      Admittedly this is a very limited subset but it holds up in looking at this specific case.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:"Good news" by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Followed immediately by pointing out that men over 45 are virtually guaranteed to have autistic children.

      Aspberger's syndrome appears to be a case of defining being a nerd/geek as a mental disorder.

      If they're still considering aspberger's to be a subset of autism, "men over 40 have geekier children" implying "men over 40 are virtually guaranteed to have autistic children" is a tautology.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:"Good news" by Megane · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, it correlates with both parents being over a certain age. So single GenX guys, start looking for that perfect 27-year-old!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:"Good news" by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Followed immediately by pointing out that men over 45 are virtually guaranteed to have autistic children.

      This narrative being sold is not currently supported by evidence. Certainly, men over a certain age have a higher probability to sire problem-children[1], but compared to women over a certain age the probability is so small it's a damn rounding error. You can safely ignore the probability.

      [1] Meaning "Children with medical problems", obviously.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    5. Re:"Good news" by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Your sarcasm is amusing...but the take away on the sperm front would probably be that you can should keep it as healthy as you can.

      We know that activities like smoking damages the quantity and quality of sperm. We also know that eating healthily and being physically active have wide ranging benefits including having a positive effect on sperm.

      My take away is that men should take care of themselves so their sperm is still very good quality at 35 and at the same time they have the financial, emotional and intellectual basis to become not only caring and loving but also effective fathers.

      Also, the likelihood of autism, schizophrenia and down syndrome in babies of older healthy parents is greatly over played. If memory serves a couple aged forty are three times as likely to have a child with down syndrome! - sounds like a huge risk...until you see figures like 1 in 350 is your base chance and that goes to 1 in 100 at 40. (Source: http://www.mayoclinic.org/dise... )

      So if you are a young man or woman and you drink or you smoke, or you don't sleep, or you eat junk all the time, you dont exercise or even dabble in drugs - think about it.

      It never ceases to amaze me how a young guy can spend hours fixing and polishing his car or a young woman puts in so much effort into her looks and dress but their body?! it suffers abuses to no end. Your body is your only vehicle, treat it well and it will carry you.

      --
      A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    6. Re:"Good news" by wyHunter · · Score: 2

      It is interesting to be a living case study - but I wonder how much was correlation versus causation? Computer science jobs existed by time your Dad was born.

  2. Can confirm. by dtmancom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Had my only child, a male child, at the age of 35. He is now 11 and is very much Dad's science geek.

    Couldn't be prouder.

    1. Re:Can confirm. by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have the same, but my kid is as dumb as a rock but good at sports. We cancel each other out.

    2. Re:Can confirm. by TWX · · Score: 1

      I hope they remember to put the bolts into the satellite table mounting fixture prior to rotating it over to work on a different side.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:Can confirm. by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Anyone who has four degrees isn't too bright. They just don't want to get a real job.

    4. Re:Can confirm. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Quite the opposite, when after getting your degree you had even remotely the amount of time to goof off?

      Hell, I'd tack on another degree right now if someone paid for it!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Can confirm. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I swear I did nothing to push my son into computers. He had a really good series of engineering courses in high school, and wanted to be a mechanical or electric engineer. He took an introduction to programming for engineers, changed to Computer Science, and never looked back. He resembles me in so many ways (although he's got the high-functioning ASD but no the depression, fortunately).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  3. Can't play with kids since they're too old and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    tired so the kids have to get smarter and play with themselves.

  4. Lamarckism making a comeback. by know1 · · Score: 1

    It would certainly explain these results.

  5. Re:Correlation. by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    Correlation? More like a tautology.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. Re: Correlation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Funny how the same political party that screams about that, is also the same one that wants to cut all family planning assistance to Africa.

  7. It's about the money by chispito · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The older you are when you have kids, the more you are earning, the more disposable income you (and your parents or in-laws) can spend on quality toys and activities, instead of just trying to keep the heat on and food on the table. Also you're probably more educated, so there's that.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    1. Re:It's about the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's about the intelligence to wait until you have the money. Correlation, cause, effect, and all that.

    2. Re:It's about the money by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      Let's not forget maturity and life experience. Guys in the 20s (particularly early 20s) frankly still tend to a lot of stupid stuff. No, I'm not intending to insult any young people around here, and I'll fully cop to this myself. But it's the reason why insurance rates, for example, are so high for young men -- they get into more accidents because they do riskier things and simply aren't as mature.

      Eventually life experience kicks in -- for some later than others. By the time you're a little older, you also have had time to think about kids and maybe think about imparting your "wisdom" to them a bit. If you're a 20-year-old guy with a baby, you're just running around trying to make the damn thing stop screaming. If you're a 35-year-old guy with a kid, you're likely thinking about all the stupid crap you did when you were 20 and how to not do that with your kid.

      Also, let's face it -- older guys are less physical. If you're a young guy, you're probably out still playing stuff on the fields with your friends. If you're a little older, you may not be doing that as much. So what do you choose to do with your kids? Are you out there playing football and soccer every day, or are you more likely to spend some days doing something more intellectual with your kid indoors?

      Just generalizing wildly here, but there's a lot of possible factors...

    3. Re:It's about the money by Dr_Terminus · · Score: 1

      Or is it the other way - nerdier/geekier guys tend to not have kids until later in life, so the kid's personality is influenced by these social factors rather than simply just the age of the parent.

    4. Re:It's about the money by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If you're going to have children, it's not particularly intelligent to wait until there's likely to be fertility and birth defect problems. If society pushes people that way, then society is stupid.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  8. Dorian Grey by HBI · · Score: 1

    I was reading this on a plane last night, and it turns out that Oscar Wilde's comments on women and men and how they differ seem poignant here.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  9. Likely the best explenation by ark1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Geekier dads could be taking longer to start a family and pass on geeky traits to their children"

    1. Re:Likely the best explenation by quantaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Geekier dads could be taking longer to start a family and pass on geeky traits to their children"

      Possibly, but I think another aspect could be the maturity of the father.

      Guys in their 20s spend more time hanging out with other guys doing active social activities

      Older guys are going more activities that are well structure and individual in nature.

      A child is going to pick up on and emulate those things.

      Shared activities also matter, an older father might spend more time deliberately training the child while a younger man might try to act as the child's playmate.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    2. Re:Likely the best explenation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Geekier dads could be taking longer to start a family and pass on geeky traits to their children"

      Yep. It just takes them a lot longer to get laid.

    3. Re:Likely the best explenation by ark1 · · Score: 1

      Definitely, BBC article is short on the actual methodology. We don't really know which factors were adjusted for. An interesting result would be to know if within the same family the younger sibling was more geeky since the father would have been older when they had him.

    4. Re:Likely the best explenation by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      I think you're on point with control factors. If they didn't control for income or education they may find that people with higher incomes or more education tend to have children later. Correlation v. causation and all that.

    5. Re:Likely the best explenation by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In that case, you have to control for birth order. There's lots of things affected by birth order.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  10. Needless to say... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    My father found me to be a disappointment. He could never understood why I wasn't interested in cars and more interested in computers. As I would explained to him many years later, my older brother (not his son) was analog and I was digital.

    1. Re:Needless to say... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. You earn $55k in IT in Silicon Valley and are protecting our country from hackers. What else could a father want from his son?

    2. Re:Needless to say... by sinij · · Score: 1

      Clearly, he would rather his son drag old Chevelle while beating his wife at the same time.

    3. Re:Needless to say... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. You earn $55k in IT in Silicon Valley and are protecting our country from hackers. What else could a father want from his son?

      My father died five years ago. Six weeks before he died from terminal throat cancer, I started a PC refresh project at a local hospital and my first day on the job was in the cancer ward. A tough situation all around. I think he would be proud that I'm the highest wage earner in our blue collar family and protecting the country from hackers.

    4. Re:Needless to say... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Well if he isn't proud of you, I am! Thank you for your service to our country. It is much safer with you looking out for us.

    5. Re:Needless to say... by TWX · · Score: 1

      I was interested in computers until I made a career out of them. Now I'm interested in cars, and I make a living with computers.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    6. Re:Needless to say... by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      That's harsh. In my case it was my mother... Actually, both my parents had basically 19th century outlooks and couldn't grasp what I was doing in front of the computer all day. (A VIC-20).
      In fact, they had to be persuaded by a neighbor to get me that VIC in the first place. I never got a single word of encouragement or support. My parents were simply bewildered by anything more complex than a radio or a turntable. And this made them angry I guess.

      They were also angry at each other, and took that out on me, in between yelling at me for being lazy instead of working in the yard. I'm still working on the emotional trauma now.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
  11. Re: Correlation. by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

    Guess you don't see how others can find that to be a racist, genocidal solution to the problem.

    I happen to be pro-choice, but pro-life people would read that as you arguing to solve the migration problem with genocide.

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  12. Haha by tsa · · Score: 1

    "One scientist said a trend for delayed parenthood might mean we were heading towards a "society of geniuses" able to solve the world's problems."

    That is the funniest thing I've read today. Hilarious!

    --

    -- Cheers!

  13. Autism and Schizophrenia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Geeks by another name.

  14. Re:we were heading towards a "society of geniuses" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    which will be over-run by immigrants in Europe.

    Geniuses solve problems. They don't sit around and whine about them

  15. Feel good but not true by sinij · · Score: 1

    Multiple genetic studies showed that older fathers correspond to higher genetic load (this is bad) for all offspring.

    1. Re:Feel good but not true by KGIII · · Score: 1

      something something something already gave the genetic load to your mother...

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  16. Re: Correlation. by TWX · · Score: 1

    Given that "reasoning adults" don't seem to be able to override the natural urge to not put one's dick away, apparently more is required.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  17. Post-hoc bullshit by BenBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When do smart dads have kids? Later, when they're ready. When do autistic dads have kids? Later, when their successes outweigh their drawbacks, and they've learned to compensate. What sort of kids do dads have when they reproduce later? Smart. Autistic. Like their dads. Cuz genetics. Which is not to say that this is the explanation. It's just to say that the 'conclusions' drawn by this study (at least as summarized) are ... let's say speculative at best.

    1. Re:Post-hoc bullshit by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      couldn't we say a smarter kid is one with just the right touch of autism, having just enough to stay focused and be a deep thinker?

  18. more sperm mutations too by peter303 · · Score: 2

    On average each parent contributes 30 mutations to offspring. But fathers contribution is approximately one per year of age.

    1. Re:more sperm mutations too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And 99.99% of those mutations have no discernible effect on the offspring's ability to reproduce and raise its own offspring to fertile age.

    2. Re:more sperm mutations too by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      For female offsprings, not for males: hint, aging of sperms is for female sperms and male sperms completely different.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  19. Re:we were heading towards a "society of geniuses" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Geniuses solve problems. They don't sit around and whine about them

    Welcome to Slashdot. I see you're new here.

  20. Re: Correlation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    because some people want to punish others to appease their invisible friend in the sky.

  21. Re:Can confirm by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Facebook can do that to you!

  22. Re:we were heading towards a "society of geniuses" by BenBoy · · Score: 1

    which will be over-run by immigrants in Europe.

    Isn't America already overrun by immigrants from Europe? I mean, for the last few centuries ... Or do you mean recent immigrants?

  23. Re:Solving the world's problems by marcle · · Score: 1

    One scientist said a trend for delayed parenthood might mean we were heading towards a "society of geniuses" able to solve the world's problems.

    For solving many of the world's problems, traits like integrity may be more important than intelligence. For example, once you get above some basic threshold of intelligence, integrity is what you want for police and security work.

    But, even for problems where the solution is accumulating more scientific knowledge, it's not clear that intelligence, per se, is the limiting factor. Certainly there's going to be a minimum threshold of intelligence that's necessary - even if you give them a million years, chimpanzees are unlikely to find a cure for cancer.

    But, in many cases, knowledge can be accumulated incrementally - like water wearing away at rock. And, when you're really exploring the unknown, there's a strong element of luck - like buying lottery tickets or breaking open a huge pile of boulders to find a diamond in one of the boulders.

    And, there are almost certainly plenty of people who have the genetic capability to make extraordinary scientific discoveries who never achieve their potential because of lack of education - or even lack of healthcare and basic nutrition.

    Well said. I was going to post a similar comment.
    Being bright, focused, and individualistic is a lot of fun, and those are the kind of folks I like to hang out with.
    But solving the world's problems may require other talents and traits, in the social and organizational realms, that geeks may not be so well equipped for.

  24. Since when are geeks not worried about fitting in by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    we suck at it, but we worry about it (and a lot of other things, we tend to be neurotic).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  25. Reminds me by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    of this.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  26. Re: Correlation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can't afford kids? Stop fucking.

    Interesting. I wonder if you're asexual - that is, you don't need sex with anyone at all - in the same way that straight men have no need to have sex with other men.

    Anyway, for many people sex is a fundamental need like eating or sleeping or going to the bathroom. Telling people not to have sex is like trying to solve a problem with the city sewer system by telling people to simple not to go to the bathroom within the city limits.

  27. Re:Can't play with kids since they're too old and. by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny

    the kids have to get smarter and play with themselves.

    That would explain why they need glasses, which places them higher on the "geek index".

  28. Older Sperm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Repeated studies have shown that older sperm is more prone to genetic errors and children are more likely to develop autism and schizophrenia.

    I rarely have any sperm that are more than a day old.

  29. Re: Correlation. by skids · · Score: 1

    Posting crap online is a waste of time.

    "Stop posting online" is my assistance to you.

  30. All things being equal by Dareth · · Score: 1

    All things being equal... anyone consider that maybe the old dads are just too old/fat to go play outside and prefer geeky indoor activities with their children?

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  31. I've got 6 kids spanning 20 years. by seoras · · Score: 1

    4 sons, 2 daughters. My eldest daughter, who I had when I was 29, is autistic. My youngest daughter, who I had when I was 43, is 3-4 years ahead for her age at school. She's 5, can read, write (beautiful flowing, joined up writing) and taught me a word about grammar I didn't know yesterday.
    The "old sperm" stats don't stand up well with my offspring.
    My boys are all geeks, just like their father. The eldest is 21 and the youngest is 1.
    I caught the one year old brushing his teeth out of the toilet while his brother was peeing in it last week.
    Last night, while mother was putting the other 3 in bed, he was playing under my desk chair while I was composing an email.
    I became aware of a nasty smell in the room coming from below my chair and I could hear him smacking his lips.
    He was eating his own shit out of his nappy (diaper).
    I think he'll be the smartest of the 6, he not afraid to try anything.... :-/

  32. Manufacturing conclusions to complain about by radarskiy · · Score: 1

    Since the article does not actually settle on any causal relationship, just proposals, the only source of post-hoc bullshit is you.

    1. Re:Manufacturing conclusions to complain about by BenBoy · · Score: 1

      Given that I did caveat my statement, saying that I'd only read the summary, and given your failure to understand the term "post-hoc", I'm guessing your parents were rather young when they had you. My sympathies on your misfortune.

    2. Re:Manufacturing conclusions to complain about by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      'failure to understand the term "post-hoc"'

      The relevant usage, since it actually has a negative connotation, is "post hoc ergo propter hoc" meaning that which occurs later is assumed to occur as a result of i.e. a causal relationship. Since the article does not claim a causal relationship this use of post hoc is incorrect.

      There is also the usage in "post hoc analysis", where data is collected and then patterns are looked for. Since this is not an inherently negative term yet you supplying nothing to justify it as the negative accusation you are attempting to use it as, this use is also incorrect.

  33. Re:we were heading towards a "society of geniuses" by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Follow the path of Karl Marx

    I follow the path of Groucho Marx.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  34. Re:Can confirm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since you're not on Facebook, what did it for you?

  35. Re:The new immigrants are different. by dbIII · · Score: 1

    That bunch that want you to worry about them and want you to call them by that name instead of Daash are only one of many players in a civil war on the other side of the planet from you. Your post is another little propaganda win for them.
    They are evil pig fucking bastards but it's not worth giving them so much credit. They are playing you and playing the media to stir up enough hate so they can more easily recruit suckers to their gang. The "us and them" shit is playing right into their hands.

  36. Define 'older' by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Older as in older than the chick they're banging, or older as in both are roughly the same more advanced age?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  37. epigenetics by Dorianny · · Score: 1

    There is a mounting body of research that it is not just genes that are passed on from parents to children but epigenetic markers as well. These markers affect gene expression and suppression and are just as important as the genes themselves. Unlike genes, they are constantly changing due to environmental pressures thus providing a mechanism to pass on a sort of genetic memory of the parents life experience which should help prepare their children for the conditions they are likely to encounter. Research has shown that a mother's traumatic experience during pregnancy goes on affect gene expression even in their grandchildren http://www.sciencemag.org/news...

  38. Re: Correlation. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Because in those areas kids are still what they used to be here before pension plans: A way to actually have a chance to survive when you're too old to work.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  39. Not in my case by mooterSkooter · · Score: 1

    Had my eldest at 29 and he's pretty 'geeky' and loves science.

  40. Re:we were heading towards a "society of geniuses" by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    So do I, but the funny walk plays havoc with my knees.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  41. Re:Can't play with kids since they're too old and. by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Can't play with kids since they're too old and tired so the kids have to get smarter and play with themselves.

    That really is an eye-wateringly daft thing to say. As anybody knows, who'se had the benefit of grandparents taking care of the children, children and grandparents get along extremely well, in general. Part of this is because older people often have more time than the actual parents, but a large part of it is down to the fact that as you get older and more mature, you also tend to become more tolerant, creative and interested. So, where a young father is mostly interested in sex, beer, football and sex, an older father is more likely to have got past the more infantile stage of adulthood and acquired some interests in life - which he can then share with his children.

    Do you really imagine that a man of 40 to 50 is 'old and tired'? Well perhaps you will be, if all you do is lie around on a sofa wasting you time. Life starts at 40, as the saying goes, and what it means is, you still have loads of energy, and now you also have experience and purpose. Some things you simply don't know enough about to really do until you are mature.

  42. Re:Since when are geeks not worried about fitting by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

    That wasn't my experience. Worry about fitting in? Not really. I always had a few good friends growing up, and that was all I cared about. Even so, I learned to listen and not make an ass of myself, so existing in a room of strangers or vague acquaintances wasn't a problem for me. Sure, I had a few bullies to deal with, but most of them were poor souls who were themselves bullied and thought I would be an easy target. I wasn't. Neurotic? I believe I was less neurotic than the majority of my classmates who fretted over their popularity.

  43. Maybe we're all geeks by drew_kime · · Score: 1

    They were brighter, more focused and less bothered about fitting in -- according to the "Geek Index" devised by King's College London.

    Maybe older dads care less about fitting in, and their kids learn to follow their own interests more. When I'm doing what I want I'm more focused because it holds my interest.

    --
    Nope, no sig
  44. thrashing around to obscure the point... by retchdog · · Score: 1

    an alternative headline might be "Fathers who Spend More than Six Hours a Week with their Children Raise more Active and Stable Children".

    of course that would piss off the Procrustean-egalitarian left, and it would outright terrify the "work 'em 'til they drop" business-friendly right.

    so let's invent some totally bogus bullshit about telomeres and autism. wheeeee!

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    1. Re:thrashing around to obscure the point... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Actually, as part of the left, I think everyone should have the opportunity for a good life including enough free time to raise a child. I don't know where you get the idea that the left disapproves of childraising.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  45. Re:Can't play with kids since they're too old and. by wyHunter · · Score: 2

    But doesn't the hairy palms cancel out the glasses on the geek scale?

  46. Re:Can't play with kids since they're too old and. by thebullshitpatrol · · Score: 1

    anecdotally, my father who had me at 45 was more athletic than 90% of people half his age. I still turned out borderline autistic (kidding -- I think).

    my dad has a similar personality though, so I don't know how conclusively we can talk about the role of age.

    I suspect the theory in OP is valid, or that your father/parents have more time to raise you (i was using the internet by 4), or a combination of both. Athleticism seems like a stretch. Fat parents aren't having autistic genius children.

    My parents also worked from home, which further corroborates the time argument. My dad also spent a lot of time teaching me how the world expects me to act and how to be socially successful. I think in a lot of cases that part is missing because the borderline-autistic-genius parent are themselves socially inept.

  47. Re:we were heading towards a "society of geniuses" by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    So do I, but the funny walk plays havoc with my knees.

    Guess some Monty Python skits are out of the question then.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  48. Re:The new immigrants are different. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Mentioning Minnesota, do you mean the Somalis? They congregated in the Twin Cities area not because they were settled by decree, or because the climate was familiar, but because they liked the people here. I'm taking that as a compliment. They took a lot of the lower-level jobs. We had some difficulties with so many Somali cab drivers when some of them refused to carry people with alcoholic beverages, but that got smoothed out. The ones I've had interactions with have always been good people, and I think they're a good addition to the metro area. The kids seem to be learning English just fine, although of course some of the adults never will, and I haven't seen any problems from them.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes