Slashdot Mirror


Even Telecom Workers Don't Want To Talk On the Phone (fastcompany.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Of the 1,000 Americans surveyed by Fundera, more than half said they prefer email, even though an often overflowing inbox has been proven to hinder productivity. Other methods of communicating paled in comparison. For instance, face-to-face conversations came in a distant second, preferred by only 15.8% of respondents, while phone calls came in at the bottom across 17 different industries. Even telecom workers don't want to talk on the phone: 70% would prefer to use instant messages or email.

52 comments

  1. How To Write a Business Letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To Whom It May Concern,

    Put it in writing. Don't call us, we'll call you.

    Sincerely,
    Corporate Headquarters

  2. Yeah so? by yokem_55 · · Score: 3, Funny

    If we answer the phone then we have to do things like help our customers and solve problems. If you don't answer the phone, eventually people stop calling....

    --
    ...and IN SOVIET RUSSIA, beowulf clusters imagine 1, 2, 3 profit!!!! jokes made out of YOU!!!
    1. Re:Yeah so? by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly, just because an overflowing in-box hinders productivity... who cares about that? An overflowing in-box in much less annoying than a constantly ringing phone.

    2. Re:Yeah so? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If we answer the phone then we have to do things like help our customers and solve problems.

      Phone calls are a poor medium for "solving problems". An emailed inquiry with specific information, maybe including a screenshot, is far superior. Then I can send a reply with specific instructions, a photo of the solution, and links for more information. When I hire tech-support people, they almost always ask if they will have to do phone support, and if they are good, I will hire them anyway. So the dreg employees staff the phones, where they recite the manual to idiots too lazy to read it for themselves.

      There are some good tech support phone calls, such as this: "I have a critical problem, and just emailed you a detailed description. Please read it and respond ASAP!". But other than that, I don't think so.

    3. Re:Yeah so? by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

      In my experience, email, sky and phonecalls have their uses.

      Email is for something that can wait - when I have the time I will read the email. Also, it is only good if the conversation is short (not many replies) and slow.
      Phonecalls, for me, are good for urgent matters ("Hi, internet connection for client X is not working, I tried connecting my own PC, checked the wiring, I get an IP, but no internet access"), especially if realtime conversation is needed ("OK, try it now").

      I would hate doing the realtime urgent one over email because it would mean that I would need to check my email every minute.

      Skype is somewhere in the middle - I am more likely to notice the message faster and then we can have an almost-realtime conversation.

      I prefer phonecall over text when I need to explain stuff to people because I would rather talk than type a full page of explanations (to which there will be questions etc).

      An emailed inquiry with specific information, maybe including a screenshot, is far superior. Then I can send a reply with specific instructions, a photo of the solution, and links for more information.

      For the realtime conversations, I usually just ask the person to email me a screenshot or something while we are on the phone.

      For email to work, both parties need to write more information, because if I need to send many messages to get the information (for example, I send two questions, get an answer to one, have to repeat the other), with delays of 5 - 30 minutes between replies, then I will waste more time checking my email than I would if we just talked.

    4. Re:Yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed in principle, if only there was a working alternative. Unfortunately most people seem to lack basic comprehension skills. If you are talking to a person you can overcome this using clues in tone of voice etc to tell if/when they switch their brain off and tactics to get them to re-engage. With email (or worse yet online forms that lack a place for important information) you don't get this, so people will skim and not read.

      Example based on real events: landline and net both stop working. This coincides with road crew digging in front of our house. Cut phone line clearly visible in trench. I go online on my mobile and fill out the form, clearly stating what has happened in the comments section. I then field a bunch of separate calls trying to take me through the turn-it-off-and-on-again cycle, none of whom have read the relevant details. Nothing happens for about 3 months until I finally luck out and find a human to talk to. I explain the problem and it is fixed in under a week. Sadly this (complete failure of electronic forms of communication) is not an isolated incident but rather the default.

    5. Re:Yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happens in phone calls too - especially when the person you are talking to has to relay a message to someone who can fix. Way back when - I worked on a PBX with analog DID lines - no UPS. Whenever we had a power outage, some of the DID lines would go out of service until the phone company manually reset them. I would call repair and say "we had a power failure - circuit numbers X, Y and Z are out, and need to be reset." Usually a week would go by, and I'd get a call from a tech. "I've been testing your lines, and don't see anything wrong. Mind if I just reset them?"

    6. Re:Yeah so? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Email can be sorted over time, hours, days.
      A call has to start been taken seriously as management might actually monitor calls and in some parts of the world listen in.
      Real time feed back on how skilled staff are working with consumers and how the brand is been looked after.

      That "photo" and "links" sent back and around networks a few times between a stranger and a worker might also be a security risk.
      A phone and spoken account details might just help an issue for one person.
      The ability to recite the manual to consumers actually solves some easy to fix issues. The consumer thinks they are getting real advanced help and might even make them suggest the brand that was responsive to another person.
      A email that got an automated reply a few days ago and is still waiting to be sorted by a human will not help branding.
      Management should also understand that for their own internal staff support. If support fails, good workers find better jobs.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Yeah so? by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I just finished working through a huge problem* with my university's IT email team. Every time I sent them an email, they followed up by calling me on the phone. Didn't inspire confidence in their email system.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    8. Re:Yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many Managers and Manages of customers LOVE phone calls over email for a number of reasons, such as
      - it has an air of the issue being taken more seriously
      - it makes other jump through hoops and can put them on the defensive
      - it lacks the record of writing, so you can say one thing and deny it later if it suits you
      Such manager have little interest in the truth for many things, a phone call is at best a supplement to email.

    9. Re:Yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we answer the phone then we have to do things like help our customers and solve problems. If you don't answer the phone, eventually people stop calling....

      Obviously you've never done phone support. It's the worst way of trying to troubleshoot anything. Yes, it's possible that you'll have a customer that understands and isn't going to keep posing questions and (likely very wrong) possible solutions while you're trying to investigate, but experience tells me that's like 1% of the time.

      Before you criticize, you should try to at least try to imagine it. Customer calls and says he can't get email. While he is talking you are looking up what you need to log into his server so you can find the logs and see what is going on. You of course have to ask him what exactly he is seeing (like the obviously things, is it even connecting to the server, etc. since his statement was vague). While trying to get the basics from them, they are very likely to start telling you things you don't care about and probably won't even directly answer your questions until you pose them a couple times. Worse, there is a high probability they will start asking about a totally different problem on a totally different server while you are still trying to find the first problem. The customers are not considerate and when they start to hear even a little dead air as you are looking something over, they will start talking and interrupting your work.

      The same issues are true in tickets or in chats, but at least you can be working on something else and getting things done while they attempt to answer questions like "what error or indication of a problem are you seeing?".

      I know, you are thinking "I would never do that, I'd supply the full error and state exactly what the problem is", but that's because you are the 1% of callers that know what they are talking about and probably wouldn't even need to call in the first place in most cases.

    10. Re: Yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't a failure of the electronic medium. It's called outsourcing to India.

  3. In related surveys ... by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Funny

    A majority (76%) of ER doctors admitted that they did not want to need to use the ER, and 63% of morticians said they did not want to have to make use of their own services personally. And only 14% of Slashdot editors admitted that they felt they needed to use an editor before accepting a submission.

    1. Re:In related surveys ... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      toilet makers, on the other hand.....

    2. Re:In related surveys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a bit worried that I have a 24% chance of being operated on by a mentally-unstable ER doctor. /s

    3. Re:In related surveys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A majority (76%) of ER doctors admitted that they did not want to need to use the ER, and 63% of morticians said they did not want to have to make use of their own services personally. And only 14% of Slashdot editors admitted that they felt they needed to use an editor before accepting a submission.

      Who are all these morticians with a death wish (37%) ??

    4. Re:In related surveys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Who are all these morticians with a death wish (37%) ??"

      This actually has a serious answer. Until fairly recently in the US, most Mortuaries were run by Families. You were either born or married into the business. Mortuaries were a tightly knit community, one of the biggest reasons was to reduce competition and resultant price-cutting. Mortuaries tended to be located in Family neighborhoods close to Churches instead of Industrial areas. Then Cremations started to get popular...
      Thick black smoke coming regularly from a tall fancy stack tends to depress backyard picnics. So Crematories were set up in isolated areas, and were much more... industrial, often serving several local concerns.

      When a Family member bought it, there was this tendency to have fellow Morticians handle the details, and not the Family itself. In other words, even the Families of Morticians can get upset at these times, and the kindness of not-quite-strangers was appreciated... as was the Professional Discount.

      That is all changed of course; SCI is the behemoth of Mortuary Chains, growing most rapidly in the last decade. One look at their much carefully edited Wikipedia page shows just how revolting they are. I'm surprised that only 63% of Morticians don't wish to use the services of their Employers; I would think that the number would be much higher.

  4. Email was salvation for employees by OffTheLip · · Score: 2

    Receive email from your boss was much better than a phone call. Gave you time to work on an approach to what was being asked. Read receipt off of course.

  5. Effective by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

    So people responded that they prefer to communicate in the inverse order of effectiveness and efficiency.

  6. Crafting Answers by Bigbutt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Email is a benefit for me. It lets me read the email, check my data, craft an answer, and have a paper trail of the task. I also know what is needed and can refer to the email should there be a dispute.

    Phone: "Hey, I need you to blah blah blah"

    Me: "Okay, send me an email with the details and I'll get on it."

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
    1. Re:Crafting Answers by Calydor · · Score: 2

      And on the other end, it gives the guy reading your answer the ability to check back an hour later to see the exact same details, rather than relying on his recollection of a phone call that happened while he was playing Solitaire on the computer and getting blown by his secretary.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Crafting Answers by Neuronwelder · · Score: 2

      There IS a place for email when it comes to.. "Just get to the point!"... But it's not for conversations that morph into new ideas. Or have more than one direction depending upon the previous answer and need to be done in real time.

  7. What's this ringly thingie on my desk? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The majority of my coworkers communicate via Microsoft Lync (IM) with a headset. I got a coworker who uses the phone because he doesn't want to leave a paper trail that could make him look bad. He gets mad at me because I document everything out of habit. What he says over the phone doesn't always match what he writes in the ticket log. I've put him on my "trust but verify" list of coworkers.

    1. Re:What's this ringly thingie on my desk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, reminds me of my past where I was often on huge sales conference calls with customers as a "technical consultant" and had an open IM window with most of my co-workers where we where discussing the "real" solutions we where going to use, not what the sales people where saying to the customer....

    2. Re:What's this ringly thingie on my desk? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      That's a good approach for every job AFAIK. I keep a written paper log book of what I'm asked to do by who and when, and what I did about it. People see that on my desk and it seems to send the correct message of "you won't be able to pin your mistakes on me!"

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
  8. Doesn't interrupt my schedule by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 3, Informative

    If someone emails me, I can deal with it whenever it's convenient for me. If they phone me, I'm supposed to deal with it right that moment, no matter what I was in the middle of when they interrupted me. Or I can let it go to voicemail, but that's way less convenient to check than email.

    --
    "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
    1. Re:Doesn't interrupt my schedule by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Depends on your line of business, really. Most of what I do requires fairly immediate response, and a phone call allows a back-and-forth to deal with things quickly. If someone starts a stream of texts with thirty seconds delay between each, the same problem takes a lot longer to solve and generates a lot more interruption.

  9. Value of immediacy by Solandri · · Score: 1

    Phone calls are good if you need an immediate response. Very few things need an immediate response. 911 is about the only thing I can think of. Maybe some big-shot corporate decisions as well. Occasionally you do get a situation where your work is stalled until you get an answer from someone else - those warrant a phone call.

    For the vast majority of other situations, a slightly delayed but more accurate response is preferable. If your boss calls you asking for the exact component numbers of last year's EBITDA, you can drop everything you're doing and frantically look for the data in a directory of preliminary, final, and revised spreadsheets to try to get him an answer immediately when he only needs it for a meeting later in the week. Then call him back 30 minutes later with newer numbers when you realize you mis-clicked and opened the wrong spreadsheet. Or he can email you the request, and you can take your time to make sure you get the correct numbers to him in your first and only reply, saving both him and yourself a lot of time.

    That's what makes email such a great communications tool. I can take the emails I receive which I need a response, move them into a To-Do folder, assign them stars according to priority, and tackle them in something close to optimal order. You can't do that with phone calls or even text messaging. (Technically you can, but it involves double data entry - you have to type up and enter all the information someone just gave you into your calendar or to-do list. With email, the fact that they've typed up their request to email it to you saves you the trouble of typing it up again.)

    The folks who insist on phone calls for everything are usually people who prioritize talking directly with people over efficiency, or who enjoy (ab)using their higher status to make underlings needlessly run about trying to immediately fulfill their requests. Both are a drag on economic productivity.

    1. Re:Value of immediacy by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Or 3), the people who consider the keyboard their mortal enemy, and to whom your post seems as long as War and Peace. They exist, quite sadly, and would gladly see the world degenerate to the dark ages if it meant they never had to worry about the written word again.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Value of immediacy by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Occasionally you do get a situation where your work is stalled until you get an answer from someone else - those warrant a phone call.

      This happens to me a lot. Or rather I am on the receiving end of the phonecalls. Let's say internet conenction stopped working for some client of an ISP. The lower level worker went there, checked the cables etc and found no problems. He has to call me to check the system and would not want to wait an hour until I checked my email (at least if I or my co-worker cannot help him right away, he knows that and can go to another client at the time).

      Or some important server goes down.

      I would rather receive a phonecall that interrupts me when somebody urgently needs my help than have to interrupt myself to check my email more than a few times per day.

    3. Re:Value of immediacy by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or, umm, they aren't very good at DAVE, DID YOU SEE BILL ABOUT THE FLAIR? organising their ummm things in their head I forget the name right now and collecting the umm data needed to THANKS, GET ME A BLT AND A COKE - NOT DIET you want to know the model number? How would I know that?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Value of immediacy by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That would be great if people understood what "urgent" means. 90% of them think it's a synonym of "important". It's not.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  10. The right tool by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I don't mind the phone if I need a complicated real-time conversation. The thing is, I usually don't. Sometimes I need something in writing, not just to check on the other person, but also to be sure I remember correctly what he said. And I usually don't need real-time. If I get 6 emails, I can merge that into my workflow without disrupting everything. 6 phone calls? Arrggghhhh!!!!!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:The right tool by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      When somebody needs something urgently (say, a production server went down) outside office hours, they have to call me (or my co-worker), because I will not check work email when not working. I may not even be at home (in which case I will try to get internet access or call a co-worker who is hopefully closer to a PC than I am).

      I had a conversation once with a client who had a habit of notifying about urgent problems over skype (during office hours). That worked relatively OK, until one day I was away from my office PC (doing work) for half a day and he called angry that I did not do anything about the problem he wrote about. I then explained to him that I am not always at my office PC and even when I am at my office PC I may not notice the Skype message for some time. So, if he had an urgent problem, he should call.

  11. Phone calls are rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Talking on the phone is frankly awful. I think that the only reason why it was more popular in the past was due to the lack of alternatives.
    When someone calls you, they're operating under the unspoken assumption that whatever they've called about is more important than what you're doing now. It's essentially the same as someone walking up to you and pestering you about something while you either need or want to do, but with the added benefit of making an awful ringing sound.
    Most people instinctively know this, and would generally rather not be rude if they can help it. This means that they don't call people unless they have no other choice.

  12. Speaking is overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you call me at work, you are going to ask something that takes me at least 15 minutes to find out. And you will not have the attention capacity to take in the answer that will take half an hour to explain.

    Just f***ing send an email and receive an essay answering all your questions, including those you didn't know to ask.
    Or call and get a wild guess because I can't possibly remember every minute detail about a dozen projects.

  13. Customer service by backslashdot · · Score: 2

    Why is customer support still mainly done over the phone? Why not do it over instant messenger or text?

    Old people need to hear a voice ?

  14. Reach out and annoy someone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone old enough to remember?

    1. Re: Reach out and annoy someone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bong tone" AT&T (cha-ching)

      Yup

  15. What's special about Telecom workers? by green1 · · Score: 1

    You do realize that "Telecom" is short for "Telecommunications", not for "Telephone" right? It simply means communicating over long distances, it doesn't mean only by telephone. "Telecom" companies these days are more about internet than about phone.

    Why would you expect people who work primarily in the field of keeping the internet running (Telecom workers) to prefer to use telephones more than the general public does?

    What a ridiculous spin on the title/summary!

  16. which instant messenger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever tried this?

    Last thing I want is that 2 paragraph rambling explanation given to me in txt b/c their cmptr isnt respndng to cmds in lik they shud..

  17. i can't blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't want to talk on the phone if I had a smartphone either. They generally seem to be shitty for a phone :O

    In 10 years NO ONE has asked if I was on a cel phone or had issues with me sounding funny while on mine.. I can hardly understand half the people I talk to.

  18. Perfect for me... by antdude · · Score: 1

    ... due to my disabilities where I can't hear and talk well. I get annoyed when they want me to talk and hear!!

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  19. User experience? by Bozzio · · Score: 1

    This might make me sound like an old fogey, but I wonder if this has to do with call quality and user experience.

    I grew up with landlines. I remember cellphones coming into prominence and I remember how annoying it was to talk on them. The calls would get dropped, the audio quality was bad, and worst of all, the latency was terrible.

    Over time networks seem to have become more reliable, and the audio quality has gotten better, but all cell calls still seem to have a latency issue. This makes them feel disjunct, unpleasant, and unnatural. That's why I prefer texting.

    Since so few people use landlines nowadays, I wonder if most people don't consciously notice this latency anymore. It could be that although they don't notice the latency they still perceive the discomfort it creates.

    It would be interesting to run an experiment to see if people, when forced to use landlines, actually preferred them.

    --
    I just pooped your party.
  20. Phonecalls assume ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... that I'm available RIGHT NOW to deal with your issue. That's usually not the case. You can leave voicemail, I can formulate an answer and call you back. I might get your voicemail and we end up playing phone tag. E-mail (and other text messaging) pretty much implement this communication style.

    The people that don't like the above methods of exchanging messages tend to be control freaks. They get you on the phone and command your attention in real time and at their convenience. Voicemail (or e-mail) tends to be a request (or order) to call them back.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  21. Get it in writing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bosses are adversaries and coworkers are spies. Get EVERYTHING in writing. Always think CYA.

  22. RE: Raging Assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Company , an ISP, has a policy that effectively allows us to hang up on customers if they are being extremely rude and hateful and effectively place them in a timeout. It is actually a violation of their terms of service in working with us to help solve problems.

    If you are a SYS or NET Admin pulling hairs trying to get your job done effectively because your company ham-string's you with costs, leave. Leave now and don't look back.

    A LOT of companies higher System Administrators to basically do double-duty and not hire a Network Administrator. If you have 1 or 2 locations, sure, you probably can get away with it, but they seriously need to know both positions adequately well, Or you end up with issues that go on and on an on and on for weeks and months. If you are in this position. Start Reading. You have a lot to learn.

    You can speed up your repair times for your issues with your ISP by doing the following.
      1) Be Descriptive about your problem
      2) Share everything you know about the problem
      3) Effectively test and replicate your problem and provide evidence on why you think it's them.
      4) When in Doubt. Screenshots
      5) Know your Assets. You Ordered them. Keep Track of them. Do NOT rely other people's records. Keep your own. Be involved, It's your problem when you don't know what you have. It's not job security to keep people in the dark.
      6) Have a backup plan, and by backup plan, I mean service with another provider. Your a business, if your making enough money per hour that would effectively cover the cost without blinking an eye. Do it. 99.99 + any other 9's you want to add of uptime doesn't mean squat if you are out of commission. PLAN AHEAD
      7) Know what you want. You need a configuration change A, B, C, and D. Ask is this supported? What would you like to see from us when we make these requests? ect. ect. ect. Date & Time of Change + Timezone, call before change. ect. Provide Adequate time before requested change 48hrs + at least.
      8) Be Nice. We actually want to help.
      9) Complaining to a manager about your issue takes longer to get your issue resolved. Only request to speak with one when absolutely needed and remember #8
    10) Reboot, Check Status lights, get a model number of your ISP's equipment if you think there is something wrong with their equipment, or Pictures.(don't forget to save configs before rebooting your equipment)
    11) If your company does not have IT people at each of your locations. Properly Train a manager or Higher Level person to assist with basic troubleshooting steps. Save them Time. Save you Time. Get your stuff working.

  23. Citation needed by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    even though an often overflowing inbox has been proven to hinder productivity.

    Citation needed

  24. Re: RE: Raging Assholes by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I sometimes ask to speak to the manager, but only because I want to tell the manager that the employee was exceptionally good. I will be happy to talk to a manager, if they ask. I expect the phone jockey to have limited power, limited info, and limited time. They can move me up the chain, if needed. I am polite, at least to them. It isn't their fault if their company screwed up.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  25. Penny Black by Mnot_Paranoid · · Score: 1

    In my experience, I find the only effective way of solving any problem I have with a Telecoms company is to write a strongly-worded factual account of previous support failures and snail-mail it to the CEO.

  26. What about voice quality? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    We're not far from a century and a half of telephone service. How good's the mike and speaker on your expen$$ive phone?

  27. Email and messaging is all in writing by nhat11 · · Score: 1

    I only really use the phone if I want to give quick information/directions otherwise I want it all in Email and messaging since it's in writing and the user don't have to waste time repeating the same info, etc. Also it is much more easier to organize email/messaging than a phone inbox