Slashdot Mirror


Former Slashdot Contributor Jon Katz Believes He Can Talk To Animals (amazon.com)

Long-time Slashdot reader destinyland got a surprise when he visited his local bookstore: Jon Katz turns 70 this August, and he's published a new book called Talking to Animals: How You Can Understand Animals and They Can Understand You. Katz was a former newspaper reporter (and a contributing editor to Rolling Stone) who wrote for HotWired, the first online presence for Wired magazine in the mid-1990s, before becoming a controversial contributor to Slashdot during the site's early days. Katz left Manhattan in the 1990s to live on a farm "surrounded by dogs, cats, sheep, horses, cows, goats, and chickens," according to the book's description, an experience he writes about on his blog. His new book promises that Katz now "marshals his experience to offer us a deeper insight into animals and the tools needed for effectively communicating with them."

30 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Meh... by drew_92123 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People have been talking to animals since time began... it's easy to train them to specific commands and to recognize their body language to know when they're hungry or playful... but I have yet to find anybody able to have a stimulating conversation with one. Even dogs, the animals most adapted to life with humans, aren't capable of that...

    Now if he said he had been working with apes and teaching them to sign I might be more willing to believe... but as things stand now I'm pretty sure he's fucking nuts.

  2. Not particularly surprising by oakgrove · · Score: 4, Funny

    See, this is the type of shit that happens when you hang around this place too long..

    --
    The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    1. Re:Not particularly surprising by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      Not a stupid question. And the answer is: there is no reason you shouldn't be able to talk to animals.

      I speak English to my dogs all the time. I used to have a German Shepherd, and sometimes I spoke to him with a few words of German (platz, sitz, steh, bleib, hier, etc.) Just like with young children, sometimes I have to spell-talk certain words to keep them from understanding.

      Dogs and other animals are perfectly capable of understanding many words of a human natural language. A quick google search reveals that, on average, dogs can be trained to understand about 165 words.

      Thinking you can talk to animals is not crazy. Thinking they can "talk" back is not crazy either. Hearing their "voices" in your head? That's crazy.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:Not particularly surprising by Immerman · · Score: 2

      I'm not so sure.

      If I say "ball", is your understanding of the concept going to be fundamentally different than a dogs? Deeper maybe, more subtle and abstract perhaps, but not fundamentally different.

      All language is simply random sounds that we've agreed to use as placeholders for objects or activities. As our culture and consciousness has evolved we've added increasingly abstract concepts to the mix, concepts that a dog is unlikely to have any grasp of, but so long as we limit ourselves to concrete concepts, especially those relevant to their relationship with the world, it seems likely that their understanding is not fundamentally different.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  3. Oh, Jon Katz by Wuhao · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember when everyone hated him for not actually knowing anything and writing heavily-slanted pieces on whatever bullshit stories people told him that flattered his politics. Little did we know then that the future of blogging was a world of Jon Katzes.

    1. Re:Oh, Jon Katz by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hey, now - this was back when /. was being actively developed. We have Katz to thank for the "no stories by this submitter" filter. It's come in every so handy in the subsequent years.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Oh, Jon Katz by dunkelfalke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In all my time on slashdot I only ever used the filter to block Katz.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    3. Re:Oh, Jon Katz by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

      I'll never forget his article about the villagers who dug up their commodore 64s after the Taliban left and started watching DiVX movies from 5.25 inch floppies.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    4. Re:Oh, Jon Katz by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 2

      Little did we know then that the future of blogging was a world of Jon Katzes.

      Sad, but true.

      I was expecting more early UIDs to comment on this article. Oh well.

    5. Re:Oh, Jon Katz by Grog6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We would not have believed the way the world has gone since /. started.

      Who would have thought that the Clinton Years would be the most prosperous ones since the 60's to Now.

      And who would have thought that getting your dick sucked by an intern while talking to Yasser Arafat on the phone ISN'T the worst thing a President would do in office. :facepalm:

      --
      Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    6. Re:Oh, Jon Katz by technoid_ · · Score: 2

      I remember complaining about his articles until the Hellmouth stuff happened (the Columbine shooting and the following hysteria from mass media). He seemed to really listen to what younger people were saying at the time instead of telling us what we were saying.

      He seemed to "get it" and quick to translate was school administrators and lawyers were proposing into something that the younger people understood.

      I also read his book Geeks and found it really interesting. The view of someone from outside of the small town geek bubble describing the story makes me look back at my younger years differently.

      I can't say he was my favorite slashdot editor, but I won't say anything bad about his time at slashdot now that I can look back on it with the filter time gone by.

      --
      Two wrongs don't make a right, but 3 lefts do - Lew of GO magazine
    7. Re:Oh, Jon Katz by T.Hobbes · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not that I read many blogs, but my memory of him is that he was worst than most bloggers. Heck, Slashdot itself was (is) basically a blog. The other contributors back then were far, far better.

      Katz always seemed to be some guy from the outside of a subculture who tried to be seen as an expert in it by declaring strongly held opinions. Bad enough, but the opinions were usually ingratiating, patronizing, and/or wrong.

      Even Michael Sims wasn't as bad!

  4. Re:Well Duh. by BlytheBowman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just asked my dog if he wanted a hug. He gives awesome hugs.

    mine gives me awesome tongue kisses.....deep deep tongue kisses.....

  5. His book's title needs modification, I'm afraid by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The title, "How You Can Understand Animals and They Can Understand You" needs an edit to:

    How You Can Understand "domesticated" Animals and They Can Understand You.

    This is because he's only dealt with such animals and none from the wild. If he's up to the challenge, I welcome him to the Sahara, where coming face to face with some of its four legged inhabitants [without protection], immediately invokes the question, "Could you be my next meal?" in the animal's mind.

    1. Re:His book's title needs modification, I'm afraid by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Certainly, even with perfect communication it's important to have something worth saying that's more valuable than your caloric content. I wouldn't particularly want to encounter a band of human cannibals without some really valuable information to share either, no matter how well we could communicate.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:His book's title needs modification, I'm afraid by meglon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, it works with non-domesticated animals as well. For example, if the mountain lion has it's teeth around your neck and is dragging you off into the woods, it's saying: "Hey, why don't you come over for dinner tonight?"

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  6. Here's what they say by Kohath · · Score: 2
  7. If the open paragraph doesn't start with... by sunking2 · · Score: 2

    In the post Columbine era .... He used a ghost writer.

  8. Re:Lol by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Informative

    Shit nerd is batshit crazy haha.

    Once again, the headline is totally misleading. Anyone capable of talking can talk to animals.
    Thinking that they understand english and are talking back to you, that may call for a check-up, an MRI, and maybe some meds.

    BTW, The bats told me they have nothing to do with this and they resent your assertion about their feces being involved in any way. You will hear from their lawyer as soon as they find one that speaks bat.

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  9. Re:Lol by KGIII · · Score: 2

    LOL I have chickens and a dog. The neighbor has a farm that's got lots of animals.

    I talk to the chickens, all the time. They're my miniature dinosaurs. (They are foul beasts and I didn't actually invite them - they just marched their way here from the neighboring farm, quite a feat but not unheard of.)

    The chickens talk back.

    The dog does not talk back.

    Now, at the farm next door, those animals talk back all the time. I moo at the cows and they moo back. The piglets squeal at me. The chickens are mouthy. They horses snort and whinny.

    I don't have any idea what they're saying, and I'm pretty sure they don't actually understand me, but they do actually vocalize back to you. I'm not sure if I can call it talking, but they do make noises back.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  10. Re:Lol by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    I don't have any idea what they're saying, and I'm pretty sure they don't actually understand me, but they do actually vocalize back to you. I'm not sure if I can call it talking, but they do make noises back.

    Yep, that pretty much sums it up for the situation at my post-cubicle e-workplace innovative paradigm disruption customer client design center where I am supposed to actually "work" . . .

    "surrounded by dogs, cats, sheep, horses, cows, goats, and chickens,"

    . . . indeed . . . but we collectively call them "management" . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  11. Re:Lol by Immerman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My cat understands a great deal more English than that - she'll meow at the window to come in, and will wait until I tell her to "got to the door" - no other statement will send her off to the door. Similarly she has a distinctive "yes" and "no" meows, and we can play a belabored 20 questions when she wants something. Her vocabulary is limited, and it's usually easier to just tell her to "show me" and follow her, but that doesn't work for everything.

    Just like with dogs, the trick is to use a limited and consistent vocabulary of words and phrases (and intonations - they're usually a lot more sensitive to pitch for recognition than English normally is) to communicate ideas so that they can understand you, and to take the time to learn at least their basic communications (and to clearly and immediately indicate your understanding, especially when starting out, so that they learn what noises/motions to use to communicate with you)

    These are social animals after all, and you need only watch them for a while to see that they communicate at least basic concepts amongst themselves, and even between species. There's absolutely no reason we can't do the same with them. Well, except for the lack of a tail - that does give us a pretty severe speech impediment.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  12. Re:Lol by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Informative

    The chickens I live next to talk to me all the time. Idiots on slashdot are free to call me names, but I do understand much of what they say. There isn't much to understand, really, they're rather simple-minded.

    Usually they say, "I see you, I'm right here. I see you, I'm right here. I see you, I'm right here." That sounds like, "bok. bok bok. bok."

    Sometimes they say, "I just laid the most wonderful egg, I'm so happy I laid this egg, it is the best egg ever because I laid it." That sounds like "bok bok baGOK, bok bok baGOK, bok bok baGOK."

    Rarely they're having a crisis, like malfunctioning water source, and they'll say, "bagokbagokbagok? bagok? bagokbagok?"

    If they're free range they also have a bunch of phrases relating to food, which mostly translate to, "dibs! dibs! hey, I called dibs you jerk! dibs! dibs!" They also have descriptive terms for the quality of food, but I doubt a human is going to translate that as easily as the above. But it is often obvious what the topic and general thrust of conversation is.

  13. Re:Lol by KGIII · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mine are perverts.

    If you listen carefully, they're saying, "Suck suck suck suck my cock."

    They're hens! They don't have a cock. Sheesh.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  14. Re:Lol by skam240 · · Score: 2

    Huh, I didnt think slashdot filtered. Kinda wish they didn't if only to make it easier to spot the garbage individuals.

    It's like people who drive intentionally loud cars. "Cool... and now I know you're a douche bag"

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  15. Perfectly Reasonable. by pubwvj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is a perfectly reasonable statement. I talk _with_ animals. I farm and have a large pack of livestock guardian herding dogs. We communicate with about 300 words and phrases. It is two way communications. Some of it is vocal. Some of it is body language. Some of it is sign language. I can tell the dogs things and they can tell me things and they talk to each other - no surprises there. People have been doing it for thousands of years.

    What is unfortunate is that urban people have lost this connection to the natural world. Dogs raised as singles don't typically get the cultural knowledge passed down generation to generation like dogs in a farming pack. Pet dogs typically are all alone much of the day and when you get home you greet them and then ignore them in all too many cases. This results in both you and the dog losing the ability to communicate with each other.

    Oh, and it isn't just dogs. Pigs have about 30 words they use, sheep use about ten words and chickens use about six words. Learn their words and you can understand what they're talking about as well as talking to them. When we're herding livestock we typically use a couple of the target animal's words to help with the herding. I say we as in both we humans and the dogs. The dogs are multilingual. They pickup the words we use to tell pigs to move forward and they use them too to get the pigs to do the same thing.

    1. Re:Perfectly Reasonable. by Mal-2 · · Score: 2

      Pigs and dogs do seem to be able to either speak each others' languages, or are at least mutually intelligible to each other. I've had friends with pot-bellied pigs, and one of them also had three dogs. The pig (literally) ran with their pack all the time. We were both in agreement that it believed it was a dog, right up to wagging its tail. This story makes me wonder if it wasn't confused at all, but rather was simply speaking the common language -- dog.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  16. I miss Jon Katz by Tihstae · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And here goes years and years of good Karma. Does Karma still matter on /. ?

    His Hellmouth piece was great and brought some geek issues to the forefront and got some issues talked about in normal non-geek circles.

    I joined /. because of Jon Katz and the Hellmouth piece.

    Not all of his work was good. In fact some was quite awful but it always inspired conversation rather that what we now have here.

  17. Re:Lol by vtcodger · · Score: 2

    "The problem is that animals cannot talk to us. We are too stupid to understand them."

    A point that our dogs have made to us (non-verbally) on numerous occasions. But their feeling seems to be that even though the average human ranks somewhere between cats and carrots on the native intelligence scale, it is sometimes possible to convey a few basic thoughts to us by repeating the same actions over and over ... and over..

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  18. Talking dog by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    A man and his dog walk into a bar. The man says, "I'll bet you a round of drinks that my dog can talk."

    Bartender: "Yeah! Sure...go ahead."

    Man: "What covers a house?"

    Dog: "Roof!"

    Man: "How does sandpaper feel?"

    Dog: "Rough!"

    Man: "Who was the greatest ball player of all time?"

    Dog: "Ruth!"

    Man: "Pay up. I told you he could talk."

    The bartender, annoyed at this point, throws both of them out the door. Sitting on the sidewalk, the dog looks at the guy and asks, "DiMaggio?"

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.