Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk's Boring Machine Completes the First Section of An LA Tunnel (theverge.com)

New submitter simkel shares a report from The Verge: Serial entrepreneur Elon Musk says his ambitious tunnel-boring endeavor, aptly named The Boring Company, has officially started digging underneath Los Angeles. Musk announced the news on Twitter, where he said "Godot," the Samuel Beckett-inspired name of the company's tunnel boring machine, had completed the the first segment of a tunnel in the Southern California metropolis. Prior to today, it was unclear how long it would take Musk to convince the city to allow him to move the experimental effort beyond the SpaceX parking lot in Hawthorne. We don't have details on what Musk hammered out with the city of LA. But he did tweet earlier this month about a meeting with L.A Mayor Eric Garcetti to lay the groundwork for the necessary permits and regulatory approvals he'd need to start digging with Godot, which weighs about 1,200 tons and runs about 400 feet long. Musk said last month that the first tunnel would run from LAX to Culver City, Santa Monica, Westwood, and Sherman Oaks, with later tunnels covering more of the greater LA area. Now, it looks like the LAX to Culver City route appears underway.

22 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. How long? by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article doesn't say, but does anyone know how long this "first segment" is? Since the TBM itself is 400 feet long, I can only assume it's at least 400 feet...

    1. Re:How long? by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      I don't know, but I'm not waiting for it.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:How long? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 3, Informative

      A segment refers to the concrete liner rings. So actually, using Seattle's project with the world's largest boring machine as an upper limit seems more like a couple orders of magnitude less. The tunnel is lined with 2-ft thick by 6.5ft long concrete panels or segments.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    3. Re:How long? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 4, Funny

      So they cut a lousy six and a half feet? Call me when they connect two cities!

      I'm selling shares in a venture to connect the cities of Champaign and Urbana if you're interested.

  2. Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Musk's idea is original and terrific! He is proposing building a network of tunnels to move people around LA. No other cities anywhere will have such things. These subterranean roadways, or subways, will be... oh wait.

    To keep the concept fresh, he could sell sandwiches on them as well. They would be Subway Sand... nevermind.

    1. Re: Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah . And none of his businesses ever made money. If PayPal didn't buy his payment system back in the dot.bomb era, he'd be some Schlub at Starbucks askng , " do you want room for cream?"

      track record indeed. Silly Valley people are worse than the Evangelical Christians I'm surrounded by.

    2. Re: Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      SpaceX has had unprofitable periods and profitable periods. General consensus is that it's probably running around the break even point on average, but it's doing that while plumbing a large amount of R&D money into reusable rocket technologies, developing them and currently trying to drive the refurb window down to days. That may not meet your definition of "profitable", but if nothing else, it's employing a lot of people, helping local economies, advancing the state of the art in aerospace, and has directly driven launch costs down while causing competitors to find ways to make access to space cheaper too. That's already a win, even if they go bust tomorrow, which is unlikely.

      There's a similar situation for Tesla, plumbing a huge amount of money into a battery factory and generally investing for the long haul, not for immediate profit.

      Unlike many businessmen, Musk is not in it for the money. He's in it to change the world in ways he believe are for the better. Will it all work out? Probably some will, some won't (I'm not sold on the viability of the Boring idea), and there are problems with his approaches (e.g, running employees to the bone) but it's still a damn sight more impressive than "schlub at Starbucks". He's done more for the world than you will do if you had a hundred lifetimes to do it in.

  3. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    Old economy square daddies don't. Hip unicorns with agile apps totally do.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 4, Funny

    He already used all the tunneling equipment to build his secret underground super-villain lair. This is just re-purposing it for profit.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  5. Wow.... by beheaderaswp · · Score: 3, Funny

    And there I am... just past 50 years old thinking the only revolution I'd see was the internet.

    And here we are... rockets, electric cars, and tunneling machines.

    I hope I make it to 90!!!

    --
    Another consultant who stuck it out.

    "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    1. Re:Wow.... by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes flying down the highway. Elon is just expanding his network connection.

  6. Re:Pointless explanation by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the play, the eponymous character "Godot" never arrives.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  7. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this was purely motivated by serving his butt from home to office I'm pretty sure a helicopter would be more economical than boring tunnels up and down Californian metros.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  8. Re:Totally awesome - really by bobbied · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But he hasn't left his own property yet has he? There isn't a lot of red tape to work though to dig a hole on your own property, some, but not a lot.

    It's a tunnel that goes nowhere at this point. Wait, he's going to be tied up in red tape soon enough doing traffic studies, environmental impact statements, building permits and OSHA reports.... Not to mention doing some actual engineering and survey work...

    However, I wouldn't be surprised if getting caught up in the red tape isn't the plan. I know of a couple of deep holes being dug in some pretty interesting locations under strange circumstances, including this one. I'm beginning to suspect some kind of Glomar Explorer esk project is going on....This hole in the ground sure looks like a cover story worthy of Howard Huges, dubious in actual value, but plausible enough you cannot just dismiss it out of hand.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  9. Earthquakes? by irrational_design · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm sure this isn't an issue since they must have smart engineers working on the project, but the first thing that comes to my mind are the earthquakes that plague California. Is this not an issue?

    1. Re:Earthquakes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      let me search that for you, lazy internet user.

      How is it safe to be underground when the earth starts shaking? Turns out underground structures are safe because they move with the soil, while structures above ground sway back and forth.

      Imagine a plate of fruit-filled gelatin dessert. Tunnels are like the pieces of fruit at the base of the gelatin, while above-ground structures are like the fruit toward the top. If you shake the plate, the movement becomes more exaggerated as it flows up from the base of the gelatin. In an earthquake, this translates to tunnel movement measured in inches, while the movement above ground might be measured in feet.

      http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/Viaduct/Status/Blog/tunnels-and-earthquakes

  10. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by sexconker · · Score: 4, Funny

    IIRC the machine was built for a tunnel somewhere else and he bought it, but wikipedia does not have it and I am not digging deeper.

    If only you had some sort of machine to help you dig deeper.

  11. Re:Totally awesome - really by bobbied · · Score: 3, Informative

    LOL, This IS LA you know... Right smack dab in the middle of some pretty nasty earthquake prone fault lines... It's going to obviously produce a LOT of tailings that will have to be put someplace and likely have to be below the water table meaning it will have waste water being pumped out of it....AND this is California we are discussing... There will be scads of environmental impact studies required for this...

    Then there are all the permits he's going to need from all the various cities, county, state and federal interests for just the traffic impacts of his "private" transportation system.... And Building permits..... Engineering studies..... Inspections.... Mining permits... Safety plans... Dang the list goes on and on..

    This is just a cover story....He's never going to build the tunnel... At least not one that goes anywhere related to getting to the airport on time.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  12. Sick and tired of the earthquake worries... by BlueCoder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can engineer against anything. At least up to a 50 years lifespan. It's only after 50 years when the rebar is rusting that you have to worry. In other words only old structures are potentially dangerous but then that's why such things are rebuilt.

    There is nothing stronger than a tube in the ground. Far more secure during a 12.0 earthquake than any overpass. Your far more likely to die from being trampled in an earthquake than from a tunnel collapse. We are not talking about mine shafts but rather oversized concrete tubes. A tube could split in half and move 3 inches and still be perfectly fine and usable.

    The bigger issue is structures on the surface and ground stability during and after the evacuation. If they are drilling in rock or underneath rock then it should be much of an effect. But I can see Musk digging tunnels underneath other tunnels.

  13. Re:Totally awesome - really by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They are putting in a tunnel in my city for an LRT system. For many years before they were drilling core samples to know what they were going to be drilling through. Even then we've had 3 sinkholes caused by the tunnelling and it's only been luck that nobody has been hurt.

    One does not just decide to make a tunnel through a downtown core without years of preparation and approval. Tunnelling causes a lot of the ground to shift which can cause damage to buildings and the sinkholes. While Musk can afford to pay for the damages the city can't if it's found out that due diligence wasn't done and they permitted this to go ahead.

  14. Re:Pointless explanation by Swistak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude. Spoilers!

  15. Seismic faults beneath LA by Mosquito+Bites · · Score: 2

    While this 'boring' news seems a little bit exciting, one must not forget that there are lots of seismic faults beneath LA, and many of them are unstable