Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk's Boring Machine Completes the First Section of An LA Tunnel (theverge.com)

New submitter simkel shares a report from The Verge: Serial entrepreneur Elon Musk says his ambitious tunnel-boring endeavor, aptly named The Boring Company, has officially started digging underneath Los Angeles. Musk announced the news on Twitter, where he said "Godot," the Samuel Beckett-inspired name of the company's tunnel boring machine, had completed the the first segment of a tunnel in the Southern California metropolis. Prior to today, it was unclear how long it would take Musk to convince the city to allow him to move the experimental effort beyond the SpaceX parking lot in Hawthorne. We don't have details on what Musk hammered out with the city of LA. But he did tweet earlier this month about a meeting with L.A Mayor Eric Garcetti to lay the groundwork for the necessary permits and regulatory approvals he'd need to start digging with Godot, which weighs about 1,200 tons and runs about 400 feet long. Musk said last month that the first tunnel would run from LAX to Culver City, Santa Monica, Westwood, and Sherman Oaks, with later tunnels covering more of the greater LA area. Now, it looks like the LAX to Culver City route appears underway.

88 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. Boring by ebcdic · · Score: 1

    As it used to say in the Yellow Pages: "Boring: see Civil Engineers".

  2. How long? by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article doesn't say, but does anyone know how long this "first segment" is? Since the TBM itself is 400 feet long, I can only assume it's at least 400 feet...

    1. Re:How long? by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      I don't know, but I'm not waiting for it.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:How long? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 3, Informative

      A segment refers to the concrete liner rings. So actually, using Seattle's project with the world's largest boring machine as an upper limit seems more like a couple orders of magnitude less. The tunnel is lined with 2-ft thick by 6.5ft long concrete panels or segments.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    3. Re:How long? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      So they cut a lousy six and a half feet? Call me when they connect two cities!

    4. Re:How long? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Godot?

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re:How long? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 4, Funny

      So they cut a lousy six and a half feet? Call me when they connect two cities!

      I'm selling shares in a venture to connect the cities of Champaign and Urbana if you're interested.

    6. Re:How long? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Look up Waiting for Godot.

      But save yourself 2 hours of your life and don't watch it. Put it to better use and do something with more fun and excitement - like deleting duplicate files from your harddrives.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    7. Re: How long? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Well, I read the book. There's a movie?

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    8. Re: How long? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      It's a play. I don't know if they made a movie.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  3. Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Musk's idea is original and terrific! He is proposing building a network of tunnels to move people around LA. No other cities anywhere will have such things. These subterranean roadways, or subways, will be... oh wait.

    To keep the concept fresh, he could sell sandwiches on them as well. They would be Subway Sand... nevermind.

    1. Re: Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah . And none of his businesses ever made money. If PayPal didn't buy his payment system back in the dot.bomb era, he'd be some Schlub at Starbucks askng , " do you want room for cream?"

      track record indeed. Silly Valley people are worse than the Evangelical Christians I'm surrounded by.

    2. Re: Unique concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      SpaceX has had unprofitable periods and profitable periods. General consensus is that it's probably running around the break even point on average, but it's doing that while plumbing a large amount of R&D money into reusable rocket technologies, developing them and currently trying to drive the refurb window down to days. That may not meet your definition of "profitable", but if nothing else, it's employing a lot of people, helping local economies, advancing the state of the art in aerospace, and has directly driven launch costs down while causing competitors to find ways to make access to space cheaper too. That's already a win, even if they go bust tomorrow, which is unlikely.

      There's a similar situation for Tesla, plumbing a huge amount of money into a battery factory and generally investing for the long haul, not for immediate profit.

      Unlike many businessmen, Musk is not in it for the money. He's in it to change the world in ways he believe are for the better. Will it all work out? Probably some will, some won't (I'm not sold on the viability of the Boring idea), and there are problems with his approaches (e.g, running employees to the bone) but it's still a damn sight more impressive than "schlub at Starbucks". He's done more for the world than you will do if you had a hundred lifetimes to do it in.

    3. Re: Unique concept! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      profitable would be something that has recouped the investment put into it. ...you know why it matters to speak about it so? you know how fucking annoying it's to see arguments that "his" idea of x or y is a good idea because he is such a genius inventor businessman.

      he has made that public image on purpose so that he can get even more money for even more things that may or may not make a profit some day.

      "profitable periods" is not the thing on the table, it's just just the plain profit. anyone can make a company have a profitable period, but it's a lot harder to have a self sustaining company.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  4. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    Old economy square daddies don't. Hip unicorns with agile apps totally do.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 4, Funny

    He already used all the tunneling equipment to build his secret underground super-villain lair. This is just re-purposing it for profit.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  6. Purely selfish intentions by planckscale · · Score: 1

    I wonder what these tunnels will do? Perhaps he's just tired of sitting in traffic in LA like everyone else - in his 100k Tesla - with fanboys gawking at him and he is tired of the lookie-loos? He's more important than everyone else so, hey he's a billionaire, why not just build a tunnel so he doesn't have to share the road with other common folk? 10 to 1 these tunnels will have gates on each end with a pass-code available to only a handful of 1%'ers.

    --
    Namaste
    1. Re:Purely selfish intentions by CFD339 · · Score: 1

      One supposes he plans to do something with his hyperloop idea.

      --
      The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    2. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If this was purely motivated by serving his butt from home to office I'm pretty sure a helicopter would be more economical than boring tunnels up and down Californian metros.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    3. Re:Purely selfish intentions by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Apparently it's a "new form of transportation" where cars will be transported to their destination on automatic self-powered carts.

      So, kinda sorta relieves congestion but with parking issues at the destination, and still requiring people who want freedom of movement to buy a f---ing car. I'm hoping someone will look at the UK "tube" tunnels under London and realize that you can actually get a lot of train in a constrained space, and use it for that instead.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Purely selfish intentions by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Look up Glomar Explorer.... Mining the ocean floor? Yea that was plausible, but couldn't work financially.

      I'm just guessing, but this tunnel to the airport from SpaceX sure looks like a cover story to me. Kind of plausible, but financially ridiculous, even for Musk, who could afford a helicopter ride to his private jet any time he was running late.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    5. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But without any air-conditioning. That should be a prize challenge - figure out how to add air-conditioning to 1960's era Underground carriages given the constraints of less than 6 inches clearance at the side or on the roof of each carriage.

    6. Re:Purely selfish intentions by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Los Angeles already has an extensive bus system that works fairly well and also a limited subway - light rail system. If you want to go 20 miles without a car and have 2 or 3 hours to spare, that combined network is reasonable.

      Musk's system looks likes it provides an alternative to the heavily congested I-495. I'd assume that once a car goes from, say, Culver City to Sherman Oaks, it's going to go further on surface streets to other destinations rather than a parking lot near the terminal. L.A. is very spread out and most places have just-barely-adequate parking, but new parking issues aren't likely to happen.

      Expect this to be an expensive ride with demand pricing approaching $20 during morning and evening rush periods.

      This is not a trivial task. Going to Sherman Oaks means going through the Sepulveda Pass, 1100 feet above LAX. Electric propulsion is going to add a significant burden to LA's already marginal power grid.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    7. Re:Purely selfish intentions by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      I don't recall Musk ever taking a vow of public service. If his intentions are purely selfish, then so be it. He doesn't owe you jack.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    8. Re:Purely selfish intentions by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      IIRC there is or was a general prize challenge.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re:Purely selfish intentions by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Los Angeles already has an extensive bus system that works fairly well and also a limited subway - light rail system. If you want to go 20 miles without a car and have 2 or 3 hours to spare, that combined network is reasonable.

      That's not really "fairly well". A well-working mass transit system in a metro area beats cars substantially for many journeys. I don't know anyone in my office who drives in.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:Purely selfish intentions by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Or he could use one of those flight-proven Falcon 9 boosters he has lying around! Just put a seat with controls on the top. Traveling in style.

    11. Re:Purely selfish intentions by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Los Angeles already has an extensive bus system that works fairly well and also a limited subway - light rail system

      Hey, I saw that documentary. What a disaster! I don't know how people in LA survive.

    12. Re:Purely selfish intentions by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      Haul an extra 1-2 carriages at the back of the train holding water (at the start of a journey) at near 0 degrees or even ice (energy for phase change - solid to liquid - is huge) and use that to sink the heat from the carriages.

      At end of the line, dump the warmed up water/melted ice and refill?

    13. Re:Purely selfish intentions by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I wonder what these tunnels will do?

      My guess is that they will provide habitation and transportation for his Mars bases.

    14. Re:Purely selfish intentions by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I always thought it was a bit weird to complain about sitting in traffic from SpaceX to LAX - even in horrible traffic it's only like 20 minutes - the two are barely 6 miles apart as the road goes. And if he was to dig some kind of tunnel, he'd have to go right under the stack interchange between the 405 and the 105, as well as a Metro line - I'd have to think that CalTrans might take issue with someone digging underneath the piers of a busy interchange like that...

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    15. Re:Purely selfish intentions by kaybee · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5V_VzRrSBI

    16. Re:Purely selfish intentions by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Many people (and I'm one of them) are of the opinion we're at or very close to peak car ownership in most western countries.

      This is down to both congestion and self-driving technologies maturing enough that people don't have to drive and won't need to pay high rates for taxis (single highest expense == driver), therefore won't buy cars in large numbers from about 20 years time.

      Tailoffs in ownership in urban areas are already noted along with a steep decline in the numbers of younger people getting driving licenses.

      The times, they are a changing.

    17. Re:Purely selfish intentions by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      No need for extra carriages.

      London Underground is doing this by putting the water blocks under the seats and the chilling equipment under the carriages.

      The chillers run when the trains are above ground (which is a large chunk of the network) and thermal inertia is used below ground.

      This doesn't work for the "Deep Lines" which are 40-200 feet underground their entire length and other methods are being worked on for that.

    18. Re:Purely selfish intentions by torkus · · Score: 1

      This is not a trivial task. Going to Sherman Oaks means going through the Sepulveda Pass, 1100 feet above LAX. Electric propulsion is going to add a significant burden to LA's already marginal power grid.

      https://hardware.slashdot.org/...

      I'm not so sure about that.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  7. Pointless explanation by quenda · · Score: 1

    where he said "Godot," the Samuel Beckett-inspired name

    Whats the chances that a reader does not get the "Godot" reference, but knows Beckett from all his other famous plays?

    For those unfamiliar, Beckett won a Nobel Prize in literature, but is better known by your average theatre-goer as the most boring playwright in history.
    (And obviously the machine arrived well behind schedule.)

    1. Re:Pointless explanation by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the play, the eponymous character "Godot" never arrives.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Pointless explanation by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the info. I didn't feel like figuring out if Samuel Beckett was even an actual person, or else just some character in a movie/book. But boring playwright is certainly a category I understand.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    3. Re:Pointless explanation by Swistak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude. Spoilers!

  8. Wow.... by beheaderaswp · · Score: 3, Funny

    And there I am... just past 50 years old thinking the only revolution I'd see was the internet.

    And here we are... rockets, electric cars, and tunneling machines.

    I hope I make it to 90!!!

    --
    Another consultant who stuck it out.

    "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    1. Re:Wow.... by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes flying down the highway. Elon is just expanding his network connection.

    2. Re:Wow.... by bobbied · · Score: 1

      True.. Just don't underestimate the latency of that high bandwidth pipe...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:Wow.... by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      You mean things that existed already in the 19th century?

      Unless I'm mistaken myself, I think his irony was a bit too subtle.

  9. LA? by jcbarlow · · Score: 1

    LA is not one big city. SpaceX is in Hawthorne, a totally separate city with its own city council, etc. The same can be said of Culver City, Santa Monica, and dozens of other cities that many think of as just part of "LA". Each of these presents another opportunity to get bogged down in local politics.

    1. Re:LA? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      LA is not one big city. SpaceX is in Hawthorne, a totally separate city with its own city council, etc. The same can be said of Culver City, Santa Monica, and dozens of other cities that many think of as just part of "LA". Each of these presents another opportunity to get bogged down in local politics.

      Surely Musk isn't stupid.... He knows all this..

      Building a tunnel that actually goes someplace doesn't seem to be the likely plan....Digging a hole in the ground obviously is... So one is left to wonder two things... 1. Why is Musk telling us this fanciful story that is obviously NOT going to happen and 2. What does he really intend to put in that hole? AND (more to the point) 3. Who is paying him to put it there?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:LA? by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      1. Why is Musk telling us this fanciful story that is obviously NOT going to happen and 2. What does he really intend to put in that hole? AND (more to the point) 3. Who is paying him to put it there?

      You forgot: 4. Has he stopped beating his wife?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  10. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by brian.stinar · · Score: 1

    I think there might be the underground superhero/villain, and hopefully a profitable project, but I think it's practice for Mars. The Martian ground offers conveniently available radiation shielding.

  11. Re:Totally awesome - really by bobbied · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But he hasn't left his own property yet has he? There isn't a lot of red tape to work though to dig a hole on your own property, some, but not a lot.

    It's a tunnel that goes nowhere at this point. Wait, he's going to be tied up in red tape soon enough doing traffic studies, environmental impact statements, building permits and OSHA reports.... Not to mention doing some actual engineering and survey work...

    However, I wouldn't be surprised if getting caught up in the red tape isn't the plan. I know of a couple of deep holes being dug in some pretty interesting locations under strange circumstances, including this one. I'm beginning to suspect some kind of Glomar Explorer esk project is going on....This hole in the ground sure looks like a cover story worthy of Howard Huges, dubious in actual value, but plausible enough you cannot just dismiss it out of hand.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  12. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    IIRC the machine was built for a tunnel somewhere else and he bought it, but wikipedia does not have it and I am not digging deeper.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  13. Earthquakes? by irrational_design · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm sure this isn't an issue since they must have smart engineers working on the project, but the first thing that comes to my mind are the earthquakes that plague California. Is this not an issue?

    1. Re:Earthquakes? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      They're not an issue because this thing, like the Hyperloop, will never be built as described.

      You might as well worry about the effect of a goose crashing into the space elevator.

    2. Re:Earthquakes? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      So....Why is Musk spinning this yarn? What is he covering up? What goes into the hole and who is paying Musk to put it there? Hmmm....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:Earthquakes? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      L.A. already has subways; they have to be built with consideration for earthquakes. Likely they'll design for the worst quake expected over a typical 500 year period, and if there's ever a quake over magnitude 6 they'll shut it down for a day to inspect for damage.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    4. Re:Earthquakes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      let me search that for you, lazy internet user.

      How is it safe to be underground when the earth starts shaking? Turns out underground structures are safe because they move with the soil, while structures above ground sway back and forth.

      Imagine a plate of fruit-filled gelatin dessert. Tunnels are like the pieces of fruit at the base of the gelatin, while above-ground structures are like the fruit toward the top. If you shake the plate, the movement becomes more exaggerated as it flows up from the base of the gelatin. In an earthquake, this translates to tunnel movement measured in inches, while the movement above ground might be measured in feet.

      http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/Viaduct/Status/Blog/tunnels-and-earthquakes

    5. Re:Earthquakes? by irrational_design · · Score: 1

      But, the tunnel has to connect to the surface so vehicles can enter and exit, wouldn't what you are describing just rip the tunnel away from it's surface buildings?

  14. Re:Totally awesome - really by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure the extend of Musk's boring machine but the ones they use to dig tunnels through mountains also reinforce the walls at the same time. So from a traffic and environmental standpoint.. not sure there's much to study.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  15. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by sexconker · · Score: 4, Funny

    IIRC the machine was built for a tunnel somewhere else and he bought it, but wikipedia does not have it and I am not digging deeper.

    If only you had some sort of machine to help you dig deeper.

  16. Re:Totally awesome - really by bobbied · · Score: 3, Informative

    LOL, This IS LA you know... Right smack dab in the middle of some pretty nasty earthquake prone fault lines... It's going to obviously produce a LOT of tailings that will have to be put someplace and likely have to be below the water table meaning it will have waste water being pumped out of it....AND this is California we are discussing... There will be scads of environmental impact studies required for this...

    Then there are all the permits he's going to need from all the various cities, county, state and federal interests for just the traffic impacts of his "private" transportation system.... And Building permits..... Engineering studies..... Inspections.... Mining permits... Safety plans... Dang the list goes on and on..

    This is just a cover story....He's never going to build the tunnel... At least not one that goes anywhere related to getting to the airport on time.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  17. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    Adam West is the greatest underground superhero.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  18. About average weight for a California permit by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    "...which weighs about 1,200 tons and runs about 400 feet long.

  19. Re:Tunnel entry and exit will be the problem by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    L.A. is spread out, with several corridors of dense building. The "central city area" of downtown L.A. is actually pretty small, a roughly pentagonal area about 2 miles across. Musk's initial tunnel doesn't even go there.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  20. Re: Totally awesome - really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Environmental law is a lot confusing, so let me clear this up:

    Per California law Environmental Impact Reports under CEQA are only required if a public agency is in charge of the project, aka state or local tax money is being used.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Environmental_Quality_Act#Environmental_Impact_Report_.28EIR.29

    It's a similar story at the Federal level, NEPA only requires Federal agencies to complete assessments if a Federal agency is involved, or if Federal tax money is being used.

    Because this endeavor is entirely privately funded, Elon stays clears of the murkiest of environmental laws. He will probably will still have to pull some kind of building permit, but theoretically if he buys rights to the underground along the path it is his property and he doesn't need broad public approval, or even the approval of the people living above. Property owners don't own what's underneath the ground of their property unless it was specifically included in the deed.

  21. Wow, first I've heard of it by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    This is the most exciting boring machine I've ever read about!

  22. Simpsons did it by istartedi · · Score: 1
    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  23. Sick and tired of the earthquake worries... by BlueCoder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can engineer against anything. At least up to a 50 years lifespan. It's only after 50 years when the rebar is rusting that you have to worry. In other words only old structures are potentially dangerous but then that's why such things are rebuilt.

    There is nothing stronger than a tube in the ground. Far more secure during a 12.0 earthquake than any overpass. Your far more likely to die from being trampled in an earthquake than from a tunnel collapse. We are not talking about mine shafts but rather oversized concrete tubes. A tube could split in half and move 3 inches and still be perfectly fine and usable.

    The bigger issue is structures on the surface and ground stability during and after the evacuation. If they are drilling in rock or underneath rock then it should be much of an effect. But I can see Musk digging tunnels underneath other tunnels.

    1. Re:Sick and tired of the earthquake worries... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Your far more likely to die from being trampled in an earthquake than from a tunnel collapse. We are not talking about mine shafts but rather oversized concrete tubes. A tube could split in half and move 3 inches and still be perfectly fine and usable.

      I wonder how much the above remains true if you are moving through the tunnel at 125 MPH at the time of the quake?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Sick and tired of the earthquake worries... by pz · · Score: 1

      You can use stainless rebar for lifespans over 50 years. Increases costs, yes, but it is possible.

      http://stainlessrebar.com/

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    3. Re:Sick and tired of the earthquake worries... by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. A more recent example of civil-engineering marvels is the Empire State Building, which was massively overengineered.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  24. Re:Totally awesome - really by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They are putting in a tunnel in my city for an LRT system. For many years before they were drilling core samples to know what they were going to be drilling through. Even then we've had 3 sinkholes caused by the tunnelling and it's only been luck that nobody has been hurt.

    One does not just decide to make a tunnel through a downtown core without years of preparation and approval. Tunnelling causes a lot of the ground to shift which can cause damage to buildings and the sinkholes. While Musk can afford to pay for the damages the city can't if it's found out that due diligence wasn't done and they permitted this to go ahead.

  25. Seismic faults beneath LA by Mosquito+Bites · · Score: 2

    While this 'boring' news seems a little bit exciting, one must not forget that there are lots of seismic faults beneath LA, and many of them are unstable

  26. Or perhaps a reference to Buck Godot. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Or perhaps it's a reference to the (massive, extremely strong, near invulnerable, hyper competent, hyper confident, and utterly laid-back) science fiction graphic novel character Buck Godot.

    (Who, himself, is a reference to "Waiting For Godot", but a step removed.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  27. StarTram Redux? by mentil · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Musk is planning on combining boring, hyperloop, and SpaceX tech to create a maglev space launch system like StarTram.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  28. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by The123king · · Score: 1

    Too Soon.

    But still funny.

    --
    If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
  29. Re:Totally awesome - really by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    They are putting in a tunnel in my city for an LRT system. ... Tunnelling causes a lot of the ground to shift which can cause damage to buildings and the sinkholes.

    They are not doing it the right way then. Modern tunneling generally lines the bore continuously as the earth is cut. There should be no external effect whatsoever; that is how London's Crossrail is being built. But I wouldn't like to say about the ground in an area with moving faults, like California.

    Having said that, Musk's scheme is nonsense. As cars are to be brought down to the tunnels with lifts, the throughput will be very low indeed, OK for just a few billionaires maybe. Has Musk never had to wait for a lift?

  30. Was expecting something more revolutionary by sciengin · · Score: 1

    Than just a plain old TBM.
    Yeah ok, so he is drilling tunnels with it, but I dont see any differences to any other run of the mill TBM out there.
    Elon being Elon, I would have expected at least a plasma drill or maybe even better, a subterrene: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    1. Re:Was expecting something more revolutionary by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Than just a plain old TBM.
      Yeah ok, so he is drilling tunnels with it, but I dont see any differences to any other run of the mill TBM out there.
      Elon being Elon, I would have expected at least a plasma drill or maybe even better, a subterrene: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      One of his goals was to find ways to speed up tunneling, by as much as 10X IIRC.
      At this point, there's no indication if their Boring is any quicker.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  31. Re:Totally awesome - really by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

    Yet somehow Japan has managed to have very effective subway systems all over the country while being far more seismically active.

    You're correct in that he just can't start boring tunnels wherever he pleases. However if you do it correctly, the tunnel is going to be extremely strong and stable.

    I'd have to go back and search but wasn't the original plan simply to build a tunnel connecting a couple parking lots so his employees could park their cars and have a relatively easy walk to get inside the building?

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  32. Interesting by b0bby · · Score: 1

    I didn't pay much attention to this until I noticed an article explaining the thinking behind it. Basically, the idea is to substantially reduce the cost of a tunnel system, and they are going to try to do that through a combination of:
    - smaller tunnels, which will require only 1/4 of the dirt removal of standard vehicle tunnels
    - automated, continuous tunnel lining, to reduce downtime for the boring machine
    - speeding up both boring and lining
    The small tunnel size is what necessitates the cars-on-sleds idea. Can they load cars on sleds quickly and cheaply? Who knows.

  33. Betting Pool Anyone? by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    Should we start a betting pool on which they hit first? Lava? Oil? A delicate fault line? American Indian remains?

    1. Re:Betting Pool Anyone? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Put me down for $50 on them waking a Balrog.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  34. Re:Totally awesome - really by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    You still have to do them. Laws don't bend to logic.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  35. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

    "I think there might be the underground superhero/villain, and hopefully a profitable project, but I think it's practice for Mars."

    Hummm... He'll need to practice a lot, then. It's a lot of digging to Mars.

  36. Re: Sure is boring... by rpstrong · · Score: 1

    There's nothing fresh about his machine - it was bought for purposes of understanding the current technology.

  37. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by rpstrong · · Score: 1

    Christopher Reeve might beg to differ.

  38. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by rpstrong · · Score: 1

    "Somewhere else" was conveniently close, in LA - but I don't remember the project.

  39. Re:How long has this been secretly planned? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    I think it's practice for Mars. The Martian ground offers conveniently available radiation shielding.

    How's it going to help testing the equipment on Earth? On Mars it'll be operating in about 0.3776 of Earth gravity, less than 1% of the atmospheric pressure, and around 100(K/C) lower temperatures. That's going to affect everything from sparking in electrical motors, to viscosity of hydraulics, to bending of structural members under the weight. So you're going to have to re--design it considerably once you get experience on Mars itself.

    I don't believe it's going to happen, or be needed, but we're already certain that there are appreciable natural lava-tube caves on Mars, which would give you the radiation and micrometeoroid protection for essentially free. That'll be enough for a Mars-based science mission. Terraforming isn't going to happen - because living in space will be easier than terraforming by many orders of magnitude.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  40. Re:Totally awesome - really by Agripa · · Score: 1

    The tailings, the boring machine, and the tunnel it digs probably cause cancer also.

  41. Re:Totally awesome - really by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    They are lining the tunnel as they proceed but we're still getting sinkholes including one that turned into a popular meme (at least around here). Of course the mayor says it's just part of the work which makes me dislike him as a mayor even more. (I have no opinion as a person because I don't know him.)

    But they've been working on phase 1 for a few years now and it won't be open for almost another year and they are already lining up phase 2 work to start right away. We have no idea how well it's going to work but let's spend another $3B on LRT for the hell of it. The company running it might be a disaster or people just might not take the LRT and turn to their car but let's double down. It's only taxpayer money after all.