Slashdot Mirror


Yelp's Six-Year Grudge Against Google (nytimes.com)

Yelp has become Google's most tenacious pest, and despite the public outcries the crowd-sourced reviews website has seen little mercy over the years. From an NYTimes article: For six years, Jeremy Stoppelman's (chief executive of Yelp) company has been locked in a campaign on three continents to get antitrust regulators to punish Google, Yelp's larger, richer and more politically connected competitor. He has testified before Congress, written op-ed columns and used Twitter to bash Google's behavior (paywalled). Google wasn't always a rival. At one point, it was a suitor. But out of that union that never happened was born a mighty grudge, perhaps even an obsession. At one point, Yelp held a hackathon to create a sort of alternate-universe Google, the better for it to explain Google's ways to regulators. And then you have Luther Lowe. Mr. Lowe, Yelp's vice president for government relations, once spent $3,000 on a stuffed elephant, because it had been knit by Europe's antitrust chief. Unlike Google, whose office is full of artwork and free food, Yelp's Washington presence is just a rented co-working space. So Mr. Lowe keeps the elephant at Yelp's San Francisco headquarters, where there is more room. "This is a shoestring operation," he said. But after years of trying and failing, that operation has finally landed a good punch. Last Tuesday, the European Union fined Google $2.7 billion -- the largest antitrust fine in its history -- for unfairly favoring its own services over those of its rivals. The fine was related to Google's shopping service, so strictly speaking it had nothing to do with the Yelp-Google dispute, which is part of a separate investigation into local search. Still, Yelp and other American technology companies pushed hard to get regulators to issue a bold condemnation of Google's behavior toward competitors, signing a letter that accused Google of "destroying jobs and stifling innovation." And by affirming that Google is the dominant company in online search -- something most people take for granted -- Tuesday's decision is likely to help Yelp's case.

20 of 42 comments (clear)

  1. What is evil is Google doing against Yelp? by Nutria · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I see Yelp quite often in Google search results.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:What is evil is Google doing against Yelp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't trust Yelp. Their reviews seem to favor those who pay for them.

    2. Re:What is evil is Google doing against Yelp? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 2

      Yelp's in kind of a weird business in the first place. Who says they have a right to exist and show up in search results. They're kind of a middleman between search and what people are searching for. There was a market for that - until there wasn't. Yes, there are gray areas - like Google's use of Yelp reviews. Where would those reviews come from if not from Yelp? But Google paid to use them. Eventually Google would accumulate their own reviews, and Yelp would be gone. But is it Google's responsibility to keep Yelp alive? Gee - I sound like the kind of libertarian Slashdotter I hate... ;-)

      Seriously - how should Google handle Yelp in its search results? If you're searching for "comparison shopping sites", and Yelp is the most popular, it should show up on top. if you're shopping for "Samsung Phones", and Google sells banner space ads for various shopping sites - well, Yelp's got a problem. But is it Google's problem? Are they saying Google can't sell those kinds of ads - just because Yelp exists?

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    3. Re:What is evil is Google doing against Yelp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While Yelp complains about Google, Yelp has been conducting a mafia-like protection racket for most of its existence. If a business refuses to pay money to Yelp they suddenly find themselves getting lots of negative reviews.

      Fuck Yelp.

    4. Re:What is evil is Google doing against Yelp? by coofercat · · Score: 1

      Therein lies the potential merit here...

      If Google paid to get Yelp content on Google Search results, then there's clearly some value in that content. If Google use that to promote their own reviews service, and eventually end up with enough content of their own that they don't need Yelp, then they have two options (in the eyes of anti-monopoly regulators):

      1) Show their own reviews, but also, and in approximately equal measure, promote other companies reviews (and seeing as Yelp leads the market in that area, that means showing a lot of Yelp on search results)
      2) Go to court and duke it out there

      Turn this around to your own view point: Lets say you've got a blog all about fishing. I happen to run the biggest fishing related website on the Internet. I come to you and ask to put your content on my site in certain situations (to fill in some gaps in my own content) - and you agree. However, when placing your content on my site, I advertise to my users that they could write up stuff like this on my website's knowledgebase wiki (and earn points which could win prizes).

      A couple of years go by and my wiki is looking pretty awesome. I've got nearly all the same information on it as you've got on your blog, so I terminate our agreement. Suddenly, you don't get income from me, and don't get anywhere near the levels of traffic you used to, so get less advertising income too. Wouldn't you look to try to get some sort of redress against me for my somewhat underhanded business practices?

      Turn this out a third way (maybe a bit more tenuous, but here goes)... Let's say your favourite political party is blue. Would the world be a better place if blue took over the entire country and apart from maybe a couple of seats, entirely wiped out the red, yellow and green parties? Would it really be better in a few years time?

    5. Re:What is evil is Google doing against Yelp? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      I guess. But your 'fishing wiki' example is pretty far from this. Comparison shopping is a form of search. It makes sense for Google to be providing that kind of service. A fishing wiki is it's own primary source of information. Google includes Wikipedia results - normally at or close to the top, based on popularity - because it benefits both parties for that to happen.

      If comparison shopping sites are good enough, people will hear about them and go to them directly. Maybe that's why Trivago advertises so heavily. Or maybe they're concerned that Google could get into the travel comparison business too. Would that be illegal - who knows? But maybe Yelp should advertise their service instead of expecting Google to steer its users their way.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    6. Re:What is evil is Google doing against Yelp? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      That's what Yelp is trying to do - define Google search as a 'platform' that is capable of excluding competitors - never mind that you can easily type yelp.com into the location bar of any browser. Yes, Google search has a big market share - apparently more in the EU than in the US. But does that make it a 'platform'? And if so, did it get there illegally? Is Facebook a 'platform' - does it need to steer its users to their friends' Google Plus postings so that G+ has a viable business?

      Microsoft Windows definitely is - and is largely marketed as - a platform for running 3rd party software. So is iOS, I suppose, but their market share isn't high enough to get them in trouble.

      By the way, when I type 'comparison shopping services' into Google, it comes up with articles comparing comparison shopping sites - rather than the sites themselves. That's a little odd... Most of the actual comparison sites listed are ads.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
  2. Say it! by aglider · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We want to be bought by Google.
    That's it.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:Say it! by Mhrmnhrm · · Score: 1

      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process..

      But several electrons were greatly inconvenienced, and are now considering a class-action lawsuit for lost wages.

      --
      I suspect that one of these choices is incorrect. Correct.
    2. Re:Say it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yelp rejected google once before. now that a number of years have passed since then, yelp STILL HAS NO SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS MODEL. extorting money to clean up bogus bad reviews can only carry you so far - and they're hitting the 'wall' now... its stock hardly worth the paper its printed on... fat chance of them ever getting another offer from google or anyone other than a vulture cap firm for pennies on the dollar.

  3. I'm not particularly a fan of Google by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    But if I were putting together a list of companies I actively dislike, Yelp would be near the top.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  4. Yelp is corrupt. I speak from experience. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've posted reviews of restaurants which were 100% honest and quite objective, only to see the review I posted "disappear" a day or two after I posted.

    This has happened multiple times, with different restaurants. I asked a restaurant owner about this and he told me it was indeed possible to "make unfavorable reviews disappear". He smiled as he said this, but it didn't keep the place he owned from going out of business about a year later.

    For me, Yelp has zero credibility.

    I believe it is smarter to simply ask the locals where THEY like to eat, and do this in real life, not on some website.

  5. Yelp is a shakedown operation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    While Google has done some scuzzy things, Yelp's whole business model is to allow unlimited free unchecked negative reviews, then to charge businesses to take them down. I know who I am rooting for in this battle.

  6. Is Yelp shit? by brennz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many dubious reviews
    Allegations of "Payola"
    Allegations of business shakedowns
    Too many novices rate everything 5 stars, or 1 star

    In the grander scheme of things I'm not sure we should take Company B's advice that Company A is wrong and should be penalized, merely because Company B writes op-eds and sweet talks regulators. AKA ~ Regulatory Capture.

    Yelp is just out to destroy Google since they are the competition. I'm not defending Google either though.

    1. Re:Is Yelp shit? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      To be fair on the last link, if I paid $400 for a meal I wouldn't expect to leave the restaurant still hungry.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  7. Yelp is a disgusting company by hackel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yelp hires sales people to bully restaurants into paying for advertising and other premium services on its network, threatening to essentially blackball them if they don't comply. It's really abhorrent behaviour. Google may be the big behemoth here, but as far as I know they have never pulled any of this kind of crap. Yelp is like Facebook—the customer is the product. They aren't actually interested in providing accurate, unbiased reviews. They are interested in selling advertising and mining people's data which they can then sell for profit. I liked and used Yelp in its early days, like most of us, but would highly suggest moving away from it now as much possible.

    1. Re:Yelp is a disgusting company by dhalsim2 · · Score: 1

      Uh... I spent over a decade in the advertising industry. The eyeballs always are the product. This shouldn't be a shock to anyone. Yelp is no different than any other advertising platforms in this regard. We never referred to users as "customers". That's a totally backwards concept. Customers are those that pay you, that is, the advertisers. Users are sometimes given the impression that the company cares about them, but internally, we never did. We cared about the customer, the advertiser.

      Here's a concrete example. It was often the case that the search results for my company were TOO relevant. That is, the precise results that user was looking for showed up as the first listings. This hurt our bottom line quite a bit as users' eyeballs would focus on the top listings, ignoring advertising. We fixed this by decreasing the relevance of the search engine. Eyeballs covered more of the page, including our customers' advertising. It was a win-win for the customers and for the company. That's just how the world works.

  8. Fuck Yelp! by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 2

    It is the most useless site ever. I see is show up in search results all the time. I wish I could just block it. Fuckers like this should be taken out and beat to death with a brick. Fucking worthless piece of shit Jeremy Stoppelman. Piece of shit wants to the gov't to force everyone else to use his shitty product because he thinks he should be rich. Fuck off you worthless piece of garbage.

  9. Re:Little sympathy for yelp by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

    Their business model is 'Pay us to make the bad reviews go away.'

    I don't know why anybody would ever trust Yelp. It's like trusting the 'Better Business Bureau'...Chump.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  10. That summary was extremely hard to follow by dtandersen · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just me?