Slashdot Mirror
Facebook Can Track Your Browsing Even After You've Logged Out, Judge Says (theguardian.com)
A U.S. judge has dismissed nationwide litigation accusing Facebook of tracking users' internet activity even after they logged out of the social media website. From a report: The plaintiffs alleged that Facebook used the "like" buttons found on other websites to track which sites they visited, meaning that the Menlo Park, California-headquartered company could build up detailed records of their browsing history. The plaintiffs argued that this violated federal and state privacy and wiretapping laws. US district judge Edward Davila in San Jose, California, dismissed the case because he said that the plaintiffs failed to show that they had a reasonable expectation of privacy or suffered any realistic economic harm or loss. Davila said that plaintiffs could have taken steps to keep their browsing histories private, for example by using the Digital Advertising Alliance's opt-out tool or using "incognito mode", and failed to show that Facebook illegally "intercepted" or eavesdropped on their communications.
once again lawyers file silly suits without knowing how technology works.
Irrelevant, Facebook still builds a profile, still tracks you and still updates its information about you.
Hell I bet they even know what you look like, all it requires is someone you know who is on Facebook to upload photos with you in it.
From there they can start doing a process of elimination.
Because they look at the sites you visit they can tell your gender (50% reduction in the unknown just with that item)
Age, race, religion, political ideology, income, and where you live are also discernible with enough data. And its not just the data they get from Facebook , they will have scraped data from phone directories and other public facing databases, they would also have paid for other information from other sources such as store loyalty cards, frequent flyer lists, etc etc etc etc etc.
They also "sell" that information,based on their data are you currently looking at going on a holiday, those web sites can then bump up the prices slightly because they too know your income, etc.
And not once have you ever had a Facebook account.
If you think simply not having a Facebook account is all it takes then flying is just the art of aiming at the ground and missing.
Not that I disbelieve you, but could you furnish a couple of examples? I can't recall seeing a Web site that refused to work when accessed via Incognito mode.
Editor, A1-AAA AmeriCaptions
Its not the link, its the fact that sites embed Facebook scripts that your browser requests and Facebook uses to track people browsing the web. When the user isn't logged in they still track them and attempt to associate it with an account later. Its pretty sleazy and why you should have Adblock block Facebook (and Twitter, and Google) domains on third party sites.
The only winning move is not to play. Seriously, I've never had a Facebook account and I pity those millions who do.
If one insists on being a Facebook minion, just use a different browser and dedicate it only to Facebook. Call it a "throwaway" browser. Then never use it for anything else but Facebook.
We have Google to thank for that. The Googlebot doesn't like having to run Javascript just to see content and down-ranks sites heavily because of it. In order to be found sites have to offer content to Javascript-free clients, including you.
It's kinda scary how much power Google wields, even when it does work in our favour.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC