Slashdot Mirror


State Prison Officials Blame An Escape On Drones And Cellphones (usatoday.com)

An anonymous reader quotes USA Today: A fugitive South Carolina inmate recaptured in Texas this week had chopped his way through a prison fence using wire cutters apparently dropped by a drone, prison officials said Friday. Jimmy Causey, 46, fled the Lieber Correctional Institution in Ridgeville, S.C., on the evening of July 4th after leaving a paper mache doll in his bed to fool guards into thinking he was asleep. He was not discovered missing until Wednesday afternoon. Causey was captured early Friday 1,200 miles away in a motel in Austin by Texas Rangers acting on a tip, WLTX-TV reported... "We believe a drone was used to fly in the tools that allow(ed) him to escape," South Carolina Corrections Director Bryan Stirling said...

Stirling said prison officials are investigating the performance by prison guards that night but pointed to cellphones and drones as the main problem. The director said he and other officials have sought federal help for years to combat the use of drones to drop contraband into prison. "It's a simple fix," Stirling said. "Allow us to block the signal... They are physically incarcerated, but they are not virtually incarcerated."

It's the second time the same convict escaped from South Carolina's maximum security prison -- albeit the first time he's (allegedly) used a drone. The state's Law Enforcement Division Chief also complains that the federal government still prohibits state corrections officials from blocking cellphones, and "as long as cellphones continue to be utilized by inmates in prisons we're going to have things like this -- we're going to have very well-planned escapes..."

39 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. In SC prisons the real problem are the guards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Trust me on this, if you've ever been to a SC prison, you know the guards are the real problem. They're paid shit and are often just ghetto thugs themselves. This is the perfect formula for guards willing to look the other way or even help for a small bribe. There have been numerous escapes in recent years where it was later revealed that the guards themselves had smuggled in handcuff keys and bolt-cutters to help in escapes.

    Bryan Sterling was a pure political appointee who wants to distract from the real problem by blaming drones, cellphones and other bullshit excuses so he can continue to insist that his agency doesn't need additional funding to hire decent guards and staff. He and other directors were under direct orders from Nikki Haley to never ask for a budget increase, and I suspect he's still under similar orders from Henry McMaster. It's an ongoing problem in a state where the Republican status quo is to continuously cut taxes to appease their political benefactors, no matter the consequences.

    1. Re:In SC prisons the real problem are the guards by Njorthbiatr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Prisons are such a money sink already.

    2. Re: In SC prisons the real problem are the guards by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Turn prisons back to prisons instead of making them profit centers for the private prison complex and you'll not only see cheaper but also better run prisons.

      Seriously, I've seen what prisons cost in the US and ... let's put it that way, for that per-capita price I'd expect to see those prison bars be made of solid gold.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re: In SC prisons the real problem are the guards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    4. Re: In SC prisons the real problem are the guards by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That really sucks, I had missed that bit of news.

      No excuse for that.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re: In SC prisons the real problem are the guards by burtosis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think there are already plans afoot to get rid of private prisons in this country. Private prisons are being phased out... at least for now, unless Trump or a later President decides to reverse that decision.

      Are you nuts? While it's not really true Jeff sessions owns private prisons it most certainly is true private prisons lobbied trump lavishly, and he accepted the money including over 250k usd for just the inauguration. Further Trumps cleansing of America of immigrants requires a detainment period at, you guessed it, prison of which many are private. It's no wonder Sessions is bringing back 1960s hystaria around marijuana and minor offenses either, the shitshow of how private prisons are run in the USA needs to end but is instead expanding.

    6. Re: In SC prisons the real problem are the guards by Pascoea · · Score: 2

      No excuse for that.

      I mean, there's an excuse for it, you and I just don't like what the excuse is.

    7. Re: In SC prisons the real problem are the guards by azcoyote · · Score: 4, Informative

      Look, I share your concern about for-profit prisons and I recently went to a conference that was largely about the issue. They should be abolished. However, they can also be a red herring here. According to Pew:

      In 2015, just 8% of the nearly 1.53 million state and federal prisoners in the U.S. were in private facilities, up slightly from 5% in 1999. (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/11/u-s-private-prison-population-has-declined-in-recent-years/)

      For-profit prisons represent a very tiny portion of the overall prison system, and so while they may be a symptom of the deeper problems with the system overall, they are not in and of themselves the cause. We can abolish these for-profit prisons, but just like taking cough medicine, it will not do away with the deeper causes of the problem.

      Besides that, the actual prison mentioned in the abstract is not a for-profit prison, but a maximum security state-run prison.

      --
      Incipiamus, fratres, servire Domino Deo, quia hucusque vix vel parum in nullo profecimus.
    8. Re:In SC prisons the real problem are the guards by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2

      Yup, that seems to be the American model. I prefer the Nordic model where prisons are run more like colleges with a view to rehabilitation so that when people are released they're more likely to be fully functional citizens and less likely to re-offend. The fact that some of those countries are closing prisons for lack of inmates says it all. For that to happen in America would mean dumping the market fundamentalist idea that putting everything in the private sector makes it work better.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  2. Re:What I would like to know: by BenJeremy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clearly he smuggled it up is ass

  3. Deflection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When someone can escape a prison with a pair of wire cutters, a drone is not the problem. How did he get access to the fence? Why does it only take the possession of a pair of wire cutters to escape the prison?

    This is a "think about the children" moment where the signal blocking technology is what they want, but not the problem.

    1. Re:Deflection by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      When someone can escape a prison with a pair of wire cutters, a drone is not the problem.

      He wouldn't HAVE the wire cutters if someone didn't fly them in on a drone. The drone is very much a problem in this case.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Deflection by cob666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He wouldn't HAVE the wire cutters if someone didn't fly them in on a drone. The drone is very much a problem in this case.

      NO, the drone is a result of real problems, such as lax security and protocols. Most likely, the guards weren't being paid to look the other way when inmates have cell phones and there weren't adequate measures in place to prevent an inmate from being in an escape position with a pair of wire cutters.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    3. Re:Deflection by dwillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Many areas use fencing with few if any escapes. usually two layers of fencing with sensors to report contact with (cimbing) and cutting of the fencing with motion sensors in between the two fences, as well as cameras and... Wait for it, a most radical idea: Guards who watch the fences and warn prisoners to stay away from them.

      Evidently SC prisons lack all these high falutin technologicnal type features. So a prisoner can walk up to the fence and cut a hole in it and wander off without anyone realizing what has happened until they realize the "body" in his bed hasn't moved in a couple days.

      The Drone is the least of their problems. Though it's also a simple problem. Tell the guards, any drone that approaches the fence-line is a skeet target. No more drone problems.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    4. Re:Deflection by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      Prisons should stop focusing on signal blocking. The FCC is against it for good reason. It can disrupt communications for legitimate users. The wireless carriers paid handsomely for exclusive use of that spectrum. The prisons have no right to be actively transmitting any signals on that spectrum.

      Here is an idea: How about signal detection instead! OMG. It would mean that cell phones could be used in designated parts of the prison occupied only by staff. It would mean that cell phone signals in prison population areas could be instantly detected -- even from the moment a phone is turned on and before it is used. You could potentially track the location of a phone as it moves throughout the prison. You would know the approximate location of a contraband phone, and could shake down and search cells in the area until you find it. You might also be able to determine who calls or is called by a contraband phone and gather intelligence, preventing future contraband. I'm sure a prisoner has a limited number of outside sources willing to help him/her. Once you eliminate that network, they probably aren't getting much more contraband items.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    5. Re:Deflection by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Back in Russia, they just use Siberia. No fence. No wall. You want to stay. Trust me.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. The FCC should make a simple rule by gurps_npc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the prison pays for all outgoing and incoming calls, then they may block cellphone calls.

    Prisons have instituted ridiculously expensive phone plans to help pay for their costs.

    This is wrong, placing an undue burden on both the families and the prisoners. Wealthy prisoners should not be allowed to buy a better prison experience, which means you can not overcharge prisoners for so called luxuries.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:The FCC should make a simple rule by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Yeah, when the call for your pizza is more expensive than the pizza itself...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:The FCC should make a simple rule by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They should NOT be permitted any outgoing calls except to their legal representation.

      Blocking all calls to friends and family could be considered a violation of the 8th amendment (cruel and unusual punishment). I don't think blocking communication with what may be the more stable elements in a prisoner's life to be a good step in reducing reoffending rates.

      If they don't talk to the outside, they talk to the inside.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:The FCC should make a simple rule by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up, +4 isn't high enough.

      My dumbass brother in law is in prison and deserves to be there. For him to call us costs $8 for a 10 minute call. Loading $20 onto the phone account through an automated voice prompt system charges a $3 fee too.

      It's an abuse of power. Even worse, crime correlates strongly with poverty, so it's an abuse against those that can literally least afford it.

      I can't help but feel that we could lower prison violence and criminal recidivism if we treated prisoners like human beings instead of animals.

  5. Not a solution by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At this point, premade UAVs can easily be reprogrammed to be fully autonomous (with minimal skill) and microwave jamming won't do anything to stop it. What's really needed here is for the prison guards to actually... guard the prison. -_-

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Not a solution by burtosis · · Score: 2

      At this point, premade UAVs can easily be reprogrammed to be fully autonomous (with minimal skill) and microwave jamming won't do anything to stop it. What's really needed here is for the prison guards to actually... guard the prison. -_-

      With minimal skill, most drones will land or otherwise not function correctly if you jam the gps signal, which is in the microwave range. Inertial and gyroscopic measurements lose accuracy quickly without gps to fuse the data accurately.
      That said I'm certainly not in favor of private prisons just ruining Gps for everyone in a large radius because of thier sloppy practices and cost cutting measures.

    2. Re:Not a solution by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      A net seems like a much simpler solution.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
  6. Re:What I would like to know: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    FTFS - "The state's Law Enforcement Division Chief also complains that the federal government still prohibits state corrections officials from blocking cellphones"

    https://www.fcc.gov/general/jamming-cell-phones-and-gps-equipment-against-law

  7. Blocking the signal won't stop this. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2

    Drone flights can be automated so that once released, they fly the predetermined route and drop the payload.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  8. Re:What I would like to know: by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I DO have a right to fly drones near prisons. There NO LAW AGAINST IT.

    But should there be? We have laws restricting drone usage around airports. I know some people are worried about some sort of precedent where dones are blocked from more and more places... but it makes sense to set up exclusion zones around prisons.

    Naturally, the very people such a law would be written to stop would be the same people that would be more willing to break the law... but it makes the act of preparing the smuggle stuff into prisons using drones more risky for the person on the outside. If you're flying a drone outside a jail with wirecutters strapped to them- it would make it legal for police to arrest you.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  9. Re:What I would like to know: by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't understand how that's supposed to address the drone problem. So you can't fly under manual control? Fine, fly to GPS coordinates and do everything automatically. A prison yard isn't exactly a small target, you don't need precision. Are they planning to jam GPS too? Fine, you're not talking a long flight, inertial guidance on a calm day should do it.

    With the amount of money involved in drug smuggling, I don't think any of this poses a hindrance except to amateurs with no connections. So unless they're planning to HERF or shoot drones out of the sky...

    --
    Dear Diary...today I was pompous and my sister was crazy.
  10. Re:Easy Solution by robinsonne · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make inmates wear tamper-resistant collars with a grenade attached. They mess with the collar, they get blown up, and so does anyone else that was messing with the collar. Also make it so that the collars can be remote detonated. Someone escapes a California prison and goes to Maine? One phone call, and the felon's body gets ripped to shreds. :) Bonus points if his or her family members also get blown up.

    Someone's been watching too much Running Man. Where are we going to find a sufficiently sadistic game show host for phase 2?

  11. "Blame" by sqorbit · · Score: 3, Informative

    Notice the title says "Blame". I think that is the perfect word. Rather than accepting responsibility, they are blaming technology. If an escape happens it's the people securing the facilities fault, whether they use a pitchfork or a drone.

    --
    Sent from my TARDIS
  12. Re:What I would like to know: by ckatko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Drug dealers have known to use catapults.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/15/...

    I doubt eliminating drones completely will have ANY significant affect on our nationals drug problem overall.

  13. Re:What I would like to know: by DickBreath · · Score: 2

    If prison workshops would have 3D printers that could print wire cutters, there would be no need for drones.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  14. Re: What I would like to know: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not just put a net over the whole place?

    Far cheaper. You can't possibly block every single signal that could be used to operate a drone. That's just asking for homemade solutions to get around that.

  15. If... by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Informative

    If a drone can fly over the fence and drop tools to a prisoner, how intrinsically different is that than basically THROWING the tools over the fence?

    Sure the drone is a lot more accurate, but heck of a lot noisier too.

    I smell excuse-hunting here; this guy already escaped them once (how is it that every jackass with a DWI can get an ankle monitor, yet a prisoner IDENTIFIED as a successful escapee doesn't have one?). On the second escape, they're looking harder to CYA than to find him.

    --
    -Styopa
  16. Re:Why? by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If only there was a way to put a small cell tower inside a prison and watch what calls were being made.

    Some sort of triangulation device might be useful, too.

    --
    No sig today...
  17. Re:What I would like to know: by mysidia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Because jamming creates a safety hazard for innocent people.

    We should probably start by making assisting/aiding an incarcerated person's escape attempt, or facilitating a person in eluding authorities crimes punishable with much greater severity, instead of the current minor penalties. They should also depend on what crimes the escaped people committed.... springing an offender with a life sentence out of jail should land a minimum of 30 years on the violator.

    Make it a misdemeanor just to fly a non-commercial aircraft within 500ft horizontal distance of a prison facility at a height of less than 1000ft.

    Finally, they should employ means of detecting drones: monitor them closely, train their employees accordingly, and identify/pick up any dropped items --- basically, more vigilant guarding.

  18. Re: What I would like to know: by Highdude702 · · Score: 2

    OI THIS IS SLASHDOT! We don't have room for common sense here. Either tell us that you want to ban all harmful activity or you're a slimy trump supporter!

  19. Re:What I would like to know: by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course not, because the problem with drugs is that they are illegal. Drug prohibition is the stupidest policy in the Western world.

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  20. some people us prisons are there doctory by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    some people us prisons are there doctor for the stuff that the ER does not cover.

  21. Faraday cage by p51d007 · · Score: 2

    Make prison/jail cells faraday cages. No electronic signal gets in, none gets out. Oh! But they won't be able to watch TV or listen to the radio. SO WHAT! It's not a bed & breakfast! IT'S A PRISON!