Slashdot Mirror


Kaspersky Lab Has Been Working With Russian Intelligence (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: Internal company emails obtained by Bloomberg Businessweek show that Kaspersky Lab has maintained a much closer working relationship with Russia's main intelligence agency, the FSB, than it has publicly admitted. It has developed security technology at the spy agency's behest and worked on joint projects the CEO knew would be embarrassing if made public. The previously unreported emails, from October 2009, are from a thread between Eugene Kaspersky and senior staff. In Russian, Kaspersky outlines a project undertaken in secret a year earlier "per a big request on the Lubyanka side," a reference to the FSB offices. Kaspersky Lab confirmed the emails are authentic.

The software that the CEO was referring to had the stated purpose of protecting clients, including the Russian government, from distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, but its scope went further. Kaspersky Lab would also cooperate with internet hosting companies to locate bad actors and block their attacks, while assisting with "active countermeasures," a capability so sensitive that Kaspersky advised his staff to keep it secret. In this case, Kaspersky may have been referring to something even more rare in the security world. A person familiar with the company's anti-DDoS system says it's made up of two parts. The first consists of traditional defensive techniques, including rerouting malicious traffic to servers that can harmlessly absorb it. The second part is more unusual: Kaspersky provides the FSB with real-time intelligence on the hackers' location and sends experts to accompany the FSB and Russian police when they conduct raids. That's what Kaspersky was referring to in the emails, says the person familiar with the system. They weren't just hacking the hackers; they were banging down the doors.
Kaspersky Lab has issued a statement in response to Bloomberg's report. It reads in part: "Regardless of how the facts are misconstrued to fit in with a hypothetical, false theory, Kaspersky Lab, and its executives, do not have inappropriate ties with any government. The company does regularly work with governments and law enforcement agencies around the world with the sole purpose of fighting cybercrime. In the internal communications referenced within the recent article, the facts are once again either being misinterpreted or manipulated to fit the agenda of certain individuals desperately wanting there to be inappropriate ties between the company, its CEO and the Russian government, but no matter what communication they claim to have, the facts clearly remain there is no evidence because no such inappropriate ties exist."

26 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. Big Nothing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    To be fair, Eugene Kaspersky did meet with Russian intelligence, but they only discussed adoption.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  2. At the risk of my oath of patriotism by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I mean, political influence is a two-way street.

    What nation with a powerful central government doesn't demand indelicate acts from its major corporations?

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What nation with a powerful central government doesn't demand indelicate acts from its major corporations?

      It's more about scale of such acts, and these days Russia and the US are doing this to a ridiculous degree.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by KiloByte · · Score: 2

      Actually, my country government can't find their asses with both hands. They're thoroughly busy firing any employee with a shred of competency and replacing them with 20 years old nephews of their party members. So even though they violate the Constitution at almost every step, they're so incompetent they're not a threat to anyone living abroad.

      The previous government had its flaws but neither gross incompetence nor illegal spying was seriously alleged.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny

      a polar bear and a regular bear,

      I sexually identify as a polar bear and find this to be highly offensive. You think grizzly bears, brown bears, panda bears, water bears, etc are all "regular bears" but somehow polar bears are not "regular bears". I can't believe in this day and age that we have bigoted polar-arkoudaphobic people like you on the internet.

    4. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      > a polar bear and a regular bear

      A polar bear is a regular (rectangular) bear after a coordinate transform.

      captcha: teenage

  3. You don't say by slick7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine that, a Russian company working for/with the Russians. How quaint. Much like the Cripts and Bloods working for the CIA.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    1. Re:You don't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Imagine that: a government hiring a cyber security company to assist with cyber security. Insane, right ?!?!

      It's precisely due to comments (and sentiments) such as yours that Kaspersky felt compelled to keep this secret. The anti-Russian hysteria pushed by western media was already a joke, and is fast approaching ludicrous.

  4. Why is our media... by Rockoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is our media trying so hard to start a war between the U.S. and Russia?

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
    1. Re:Why is our media... by NuclearCat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because hysteria attract viewers, improve ratings
      More viewers = more money for ads
      Who cares that world may fall apart in nuclear tornado, media bosses pockets are more important.

    2. Re:Why is our media... by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems to me that the US and Russia should be natural allies.

      We were. Putin visited the U.S. on more than a few occasions as a friend, and then Obama decided that Syria should be a target. I'm sure that had nothing to do with how much money our Secretary of State's "Foundation" got from the Saudi's after Syria refused to let them build a pipeline to Europe.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:Why is our media... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you guys have zero knowledge of what's been going on the past 100 years? The US and Russia/USSR have been adversaries far more often than they've been allies.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Why is our media... by phayes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Assad's treatment of his internal opposition (gas/exterminate them all) and fomenting of Daesh to blacken his opponents directly leading to their seizing control of much or Iraq had more than a little to do with Syria becoming a target -- and yet, unlike Russia the U.S. has only targeted Daesh & not people trying just to unseat that maniac Assad.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    5. Re:Why is our media... by Phantom+of+the+Opera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It might have something to do with the Russian human rights record. This is especially relevant to the subject of software security when dealing with a country where it is dangerous to be a journalist.

    6. Re: Why is our media... by Jahoda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, Mr.Revisionist shill. Russia "annexed" a sovereign nation and has since received the sanctions it justly deserves. They are a kleptocracy ruled by a murderous tyrant and are no friends of my nation. Go find somewhere else to peddle your sewage.

  5. I'd like to see more details... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    But I'm not really feeling the outrage here, at least with regard to what was reported.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  6. Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by NuclearCat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I noticed last week or so "Russia this, Russia that" hysteria, rumours and manipulations appeared here, something strange, as they don't contain any credible information, even anything interesting for geek, just gossips - and it's trending in traditionally geeky website.
    Slashdot was safe harbor for me for more than a decade from filthy political news and "news for housewives".
    Seems its time to put dot and say bye bye?
    P.S. Yes i'm russian, and i hate politics and propaganda. Peace!

  7. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess everyone's forgotten all about RSA Security's cozy relationship with those friendly NSA folks. -PCP

  8. I guess I am not seeing the issue here by charles05663 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, it is being claimed that Kaspersky's is trying to take down cyber-criminals? If they were accused of using their anti-virus software to spy that would be a different story.

  9. They want Trump out by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and Pence in. Trump is unpredictable. He's come out in favor and against single payer health care, restrictions on work visas, tariffs and a whole host of populist ideas that the folks that actually own the media aren't too keen on. Now, it's not that they expect Trump to actually _do_ any of that (he's still one of them after all) but they don't want folks to even know a progressive agenda is a possibility. So Trump's out, Pence is in and the mega-corp status quo is maintained. Maybe with a tad more religious furor but that doesn't affect them personally. Nothing much ever does...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  10. Slashdot is aging by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and older folks are worried about politics. We're getting old enough to worry about pensions, medicare, our kid's job prospects, etc, etc. Politics affects _everything_. Like the internet? Then you better pay attention to politics. Remember, it's not just news for nerds, it's also stuff that matters. The President getting impeached and replaced with a far right, intensely religious VP? Yeah. That Matters.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  11. Even if... by mhkohne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if Kaspersky doesn't want to do anything bad, I can't imagine that Russian intelligence doesn't have someone on the inside. Just as I can't imaging the CIA or NSA doesn't have someone inside MS and Google.

    I don't know why this is such a big deal - they are a Russian company, which means they are (whether they like it or not) somewhat under the influence of the Russian government. Just as (again) MS and Google are somewhat under the influence of the US government.

    Stop freaking out about it already, and if you consider their products just make sure you think about the ways this could be a problem for you or not.

    And frankly if Kaspersky is helping the intelligence guys kick down the doors of DOS script kiddies, more power to them. It's not like the guys who do DOS attacks are generally all that smart or useful, they're just damned annoying to the rest of us.

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
  12. Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 3

    Somebody doesn't know what the first D in DDoS stands for evidently (No, Kapersky was not identifying the hacker's location. That is not even within the realm of possibility.)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    1. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      How are you going to "easily find the c&c server when it is distributed? You don't really think the hacker logs into each node of the botnet do you? You would need to find a single session, most likely over HTTPS, somewhere on the planet. That isn't just trying to find a needle in a haystack, that is trying to find an invisible needle somewhere in one of the haystack on the planet.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  13. Re: Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pretty funny considering it's well known that nearly ALL top tech companies in the USA have cooperated extensively with multiple American intelligence and law enforcement agencies with details of actual incidents now in the public domain.

    Meanwhile we're supposed to give a fuck about vague insinuations with one Russian software company???

  14. Re: Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really?

    Last time checked, Apple refused to decrypt an iPhone for the FBI. Google, and Amazon also force the government to subpoena them for information. It's bad business to give up your customer's data, and America is capatalist.

    When you protest in Russia, you get killed one way another, possibly by polonium laced water. What happens in America? At worst a civil infraction.

    To illustrate my point further: when was the last time you bribed a police officer? After all the stuff I've seen, I actually like police officers now.

    All of these Americans who have never visited Russia have no idea how good we have it. Obama as far as i know did not have a bank account in Panama, but both Putin and Poroshenko did.

    It's disappointing to see how we've lost faith in our own country, which has spread freedom across the world, for which other coubtries thank us for having done so. I never trusted Kaspersky, and now I have a reason to.

    Sure disagree with me. America sucks, right? Well when Putin surreptitiously takes over America in 2020 (next time via democratic candidate because no one is suspecting it, and that's what a troll does), I bet you'll be begging for old America: where people take pride in their jobs. Ambulances show up to your house in minutes, not hours, and you don't need to bribe people to get things you want.