Slashdot Mirror


India is Rolling Out Trains With Solar-powered Coaches That'll Save Thousands of Litres of Diesel (qz.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: India's massive diesel-guzzling railway network is getting serious about its experiments with solar. On July 14, Indian Railways rolled out its first train with rooftop solar panels that power the lights, fans, and information display systems inside passenger coaches. Although the train will still be pulled by a diesel-powered locomotive, a set of 16 solar panels atop each coach will replace the diesel generators that typically power these appliances. The railways estimate that a train with six solar-powered coaches could save around 21,000 litres (5,547 gallons) of diesel every year, worth around $108,000. In 2014, Indian Railways consumed 2.6 billion litres of diesel, accounting for around 70% to the network's total fuel bill of $4.4 billion. The first of these trains will be pressed into service on the suburban railway network of New Delhi, one of the world's most polluted cities, before two dozen more coaches are fitted with similar rooftop solar systems. Retrofitting each coach with these system, including an inverter to optimise power generation and battery for storing surplus power, costs around $14,000.

12 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. Great idea by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't see how anything could possibly keep an idea like this from working.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  2. Units by ramsun · · Score: 3, Informative

    Rs 28,592 crore = USD 4.5 billion, approximately

    Rs 9 lakh = USD 14,000

    1. Re:Units by brianerst · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rs = symbol for Rupees (the local currency)
      lakh = x1,00,000 or x100,000
      crore = x1,00,00,000 or x10,000,000

      India separates numbers differently than most of the West - the first comma is at a power of three, all the rest are at powers of 2. Tens, hundreds, thousands, lakhs and crores are combined in various ways (with some older terms like arab, padma, neel and shankh occasionally used for very large numbers too)

      one, ten, one hundred, one thousand, ten thousand, lakh, ten lakh, one crore, ten crore, one arab / one hundred crore, one thousand crore, ten thousand crore, one lakh crore, ten lakh crore, one crore crore, one padma / ten crore crore, etc.

  3. Er... by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...if the roof has solar panels, where do most of the passengers sit?

    I've been on Indian trains....the roof is a significant part of the carriage capacity.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Er... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just need one train guard with a cricket bat. Problem solved.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  4. That's $20 +/ gallon diesel by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    21,000 liters ~5,000 gallons = 108,000 dollars of fuel ?

    Yeah something is wrong with the story from the get go.

    1. Re:That's $20 +/ gallon diesel by mspohr · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article in Quartz states 21,000 liters of fuel costing Rs 12 lakh ($18,000) which is more realistic so the summary is the culprit here.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  5. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unlike western societies, where we generally use every 3rd power of 10 as a reference (thousand, million, billion), India uses the 5th power of 10 - "lakh" is 10^5 (which is one hundred thousand), and "crore" is 10^10 (which it 10 billion) as its main "reference" powers.

    Rs9 lakh should be parsed similar to how $1bn would be parsed in the US - 9 lakh rupees, which is 900,000 rupees. At current exchange rates, this is around $14,000 US.

  6. Why not integrate with the locomotive? by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm surprised that this isn't already integrated with the locomotive. The locomotive is almost certainly diesel-electric, so why did they have separate generators on the cars, rather than just drawing from the massive diesel generators in the locomotive? And if they add solar panels, to all of the cars why use them to charge batteries, rather than just feeding any excess juice to the locomotive, allowing it to burn a little less fuel to keep the train moving? I suppose this might result in a little bit of waste when the train is sitting still, so I suppose it's worth having enough battery capacity to capture that energy, but most of the time it's sitting still it's probably in a train station which could likely use the power.

    Note that I know almost nothing about any of this stuff, so this isn't a "they're stupid for not doing that" post; I'm actually asking questions. I suppose the simple answer may well be "Because the locomotive isn't presently designed to do that".

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  7. Re:Good job India by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good job India- the big question though is: why haven't countries been using solar panels on mass transit roofs before now? I'm sure it could save lots of money most places. ... well maybe not mass transit in subways.

    First, understand that these panels are not to help move the train, only to power on board electrical equipment (lights, etc).

    Although the train will still be pulled by a diesel-powered locomotive, a set of 16 solar panels atop each coach will replace the diesel generators that typically power these appliances.

    The first question I have is; How much to install more energy efficient equipment on the train? Second question is; How does that cost/benefit compare to added solar panels and weight. Solar panels only help part of the time, energy efficiency improvements will help 24/7. Unfortunately these articles never give us that kind of critical information, they are more about the symbolic wonder of solar panels.

  8. Re:Billions minus thousands is = ? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The panels pay for themselves by almost an order of magnitude in the first year. If that is a dent, it is a big one.

    More accurately, the article claims they might.

  9. Won't work by farble1670 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Solar cells do not generate energy when there are people sitting on top of them.