Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Wilsonville Jobs Are Going To China, Underscoring Travails of Domestic Tech Manufacturing (oregonlive.com)

An anonymous reader tips us a story: Just two years ago, Microsoft cast its Wilsonville factory as the harbinger of a new era in American technology manufacturing. The tech giant stamped, "Manufactured in Portland, OR, USA" on each Surface Hub it made there. It invited The New York Times and Fast Company magazine to tour the plant in 2015, then hired more than 100 people to make the enormous, $22,000 touch-screen computer. But last week Microsoft summoned its Wilsonville employees to an early-morning meeting and announced it will close the factory and lay off 124 employees -- nearly everyone at the site -- plus dozens of contract workers. Panos Panay, the vice president in charge of the Surface product group, traveled from corporate headquarters in Redmond, Washington, to tell the staff that Microsoft was moving production to the same place it makes all other Surface products. Though workers present say he didn't disclose the location, Microsoft has previously said it makes its other Surface computers in China. The company hasn't explained, in public or to its Wilsonville employees, why it gave up on domestic manufacturing so quickly and didn't respond to repeated inquiries for comment. But the only thing surprising about Microsoft's decision is that it tried to make its computers in the U.S. in the first place.

149 comments

  1. $22,000 touchscreens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...paired with an OS that can only display CGA graphics.

    Can't imagine why it didn't work out for them.

    1. Re: $22,000 touchscreens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where in TFA does it say the business failed? I don't care for the lock in but I've heard they are selling moderately well to business, as well as a $10-22k device for enterprise could be expected to sell anyway. I am curious to see if that $22k price starts to lower after moving to China.

  2. This is what tariffs were made for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Frankly, there needs to be some compromise in the government. Let workers unionize, but also slap 300% tariffs on companies that do this.

    1. Re:This is what tariffs were made for. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

      Robots!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:This is what tariffs were made for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let workers unionize

      Maybe this is the problem in the first place....

    3. Re:This is what tariffs were made for. by Kaenneth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fascism it is then.

    4. Re:This is what tariffs were made for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep ... rude republican fascism. Snowflake Trotsky-ites get smashfaced. Zero immigration & H1-Bz! Wettbakkks border-jumpers get driven into the sea. Trains run on-time, jewboi investors get 4% ROI, lose their 2nd vacation home and live in Bayonne NY. Globalist WS pimps get screwed. Capitol chases labor and skilled workers lives fat. Lots of management and burger-flip jobs. Anti-trust shanks MONOPOLISTS & hurts bad. Banks get smaller and thin ... financing workers housing @ 3%. Any questions pad're ?

    5. Re:This is what tariffs were made for. by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      I have a better solution and I could pretty much gaurantee it would work, stop fucking making windows devices at that plant and start making Android ones, I fucking bet it would work and not only would everyone keep their job, I'd bet you could expand the plant but oh no Windows anal probe 10 must invades everyone's privacy. I bet that would sell more surface as Android or even Linux than as Windows bloody 10.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:This is what tariffs were made for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, not really fascism buddy.

    7. Re:This is what tariffs were made for. by EmptyHead · · Score: 1

      Funny, libs make up a very large part of dot-com type jobs. So how did this become a rant about republican fascism? Are you suggesting Lord Bill is suddenly a republican? Enjoy your job being replaced by someone from China or India so your masters can spread the wealth.

  3. Microsoft is not a hardware company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    maybe one day they will accept that.

    1. Re:Microsoft is not a hardware company by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Insightful

      maybe one day they will accept that.

      I don't know about that. They've made a lot of money out of the Xbox. Most of their hardware ventures have failed, but that one has been a money-maker for them.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Microsoft is not a hardware company by xfizik · · Score: 2

      I respectfully disagree - I think the best Microsoft products are mice and keyboards.

    3. Re:Microsoft is not a hardware company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of microsoft's very first products was hardware, an add-in card for apple II

  4. That's not surprising at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Want to guess what the import tax on a $22k machine is that comes fully assembled from China? This is a dumb move on Microsoft's part.

    1. Re:That's not surprising at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want to guess what the import tax on a $22k machine is that comes fully assembled from China? This is a dumb move on Microsoft's part.

      your point is MOOT

      it doesn't matter whether the tax is 0% or 1000%, because NONE will be sold and NO tax will be collected

    2. Re:That's not surprising at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will still be "made in the USA" because it won't get it's nameplate until after it is imported. It will be a "component part" of the Surface Hub and therefore not subject to the retail product tariff. The final Surface Hub consists of the component parts: the electronics assembly and the nameplate. Because internal Microsoft accounting attributes 49% of the cost to the electronics assembly and 51% of the cost to the nameplate, they can legally stamp it "Made in USA" and avoid the tariff.

      Isn't accounting fun? What's even more fun is learning why they can attribute so much cost to the nameplate - it's because they can "preprint" a fixed number of nameplates and amortize the entire sum of non-recurring pre-release costs to them, effectively attributing NRE to a per-product cost, which is not normally how sunk costs are accounted for.

  5. Re:No Worries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus fucking christ, get a new god damned joke already. You have to be one lazy fat fuck to bring out the same old tired joke this many fucking times. Lazy Fat fuck american. No wonder you can't hold down a manufacturing plant, you can't even come up with a fucking new joke.

  6. What this is by fubarrr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What this is is a hard landing for "Manufacturing 4.0" advocates and dotcom monkey.

    NO mater how much robots you put to screw a screw, you robots can't compete on cost with Chinese.

    While labour costs in China are nowhere near being laughable as they were a decade ago, they still outcompete any Western high tech manufacturer. Western manufacturers have no trouble getting orders from DoD to make banal power converters for 10k a pop. Why would they even try competing with Chinese?

    Making a top tier factory is a no joke enterprise that takes years, billions, patience, and serious people. You can't simply roll $10 billion USD and have a TSMC-level fab delivered by mail order, nobody in the world will do it for you. It is only possible for an entrepreneur who is ready to spend his life sitting butt naked on an ant pile, building a company along with its technology base - each TSMC fab is a miracle, a work of art, a creation, not something anybody in the world will teach to build or run

    1. Re:What this is by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume it is the labor costs of running the factory instead of the management? I am sure that the building of the TVs is the easy part, running the rest of it, you cannot do that with spreadsheets.

      I have seen more than my fair share of people who cannot even manage their own time, Handle a manufacturing timeline for coordinating parts to be delivered and assembling a product?In this case, the Chinese probably have more practical experience in running a factory, irrespective of the labor costs.

    2. Re: What this is by fubarrr · · Score: 1

      Yes, cost is certainly not the only thing where Chinese outcompete the West hands down: Chinese managers are raised on assembly lines, and not imported with near zero experience from Ivey league schools right after the graduation

    3. Re:What this is by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Informative

      >NO mater how much robots you put to screw a screw, you robots can't compete on cost with Chinese.

      This is wrong. You can't compete with the Chinese on flexibility and responsiveness in manufacturing. Well you could, but you would have to get a lot better at it and have the government on your side. The Chinese chose to be good at manufacturing and in particular contract manufacturing and they have a large infrastructure dedicated to that. Chinese labour costs are lower than the US, but that only counts for labour intensive manufacturing.

      Cost is one thing. Dealing with a million other crappy things is also a differentiator. My wife gets yarn manufactured around the world and imports it to be sold in yarn stores. It is substantially easier in terms of red tape, to get it made in China and import it than it is to get it made in Washington state and delivered to an address in Oregon. Also, the best makers of bamboo yarn are in China so it's not question that we would get that made in China. It's work to get them to manufacture to our packaging standards and in configurations that work for US markets, but that's easy compared to dealing with the tax departments of 50 US states. The highest quality yarn maker in the world is in the UK. Their stuff is costly more due to shipping from the UK than from the cost of manufacture. I've seen their factory floor and from processing incoming unprocessed sheared wool, to spinning to coning or balling involved 4 people.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    4. Re:What this is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets see the obvious errors in you post regarding TSMC. Taiwan != China so most of TSMC:s fabs are not in China.
      TSMC have 1 Fab in China but they also have 1 Fab in the US and are planning a second fab.
      They have 8-10+ fabs in Taiwan so it would be competition against Taiwan since both Taiwan and USA bets China in amounts of Fabs even if China has some special ones but i guess what you really are arguing about factories belonging to contract manufacturers like Foxconn

    5. Re:What this is by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      Funny that you mention yarn. I live near the NC/SC border, and in SC, there's about 4 or 5 large buildings dedicated to textile manufacturing that have popped up in the past decade or so. Several of them even have foreign owners as shown by the Chinese letters (Keer) and then there's the old mainstays like Springs. Historically the Carolinas had a large textile industry, but it was weird seeing the jobs come back to the area under a Chinese overlord.

    6. Re:What this is by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I suspect, without being able to give details right now, that this is related to the byzantine tax and tariff laws the US has on importing. E.G. the tax on yarn short than 6" is very different to importing yarn that is longer. This is because of some protectionist lobbying in the past by carpet manufacturers. That's only one example. It is very, very complicated. Doing later stage processing in the US , lets you import the goods in a different form. Much like assembling foreign components in the US is for car manufacturers.

      True story - We walked into the customs in Chicago, suitably jet lagged, after travelling back from a work+vacation trip to the UK and Ireland. My wife had two large suitcases packed as tightly as possible with nothing but pre-balled yarn (like you would see on a shop shelf) that she got on the trip from manufacturers and was going to try out in some stores to as a precursor to maybe shipping in bulk. This was maybe $5000 of goods. We ticked the "Yes we have goods" box on the customs form and got shuffled over to someone in a room who took a look. It was about 10.30pm. We thought (although it was hard to tell because the laws are badly written) that we owed 6% import tariff. We could both see the gears going off in her head - It's yarn, it's knitting yarn, packaged, sample stock, etc. - and she wanted to get home and didn't want to have to work out the tariff by wading through the rules on all those things, all of which matter. She waved us through. No charge.

      It's worth paying an import expert who can fill in the forms and optimize the tariff situation. Like a good accountant, they save more than they cost.

       

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  7. It's the product not the manufacturing location by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

    This has little to nothing to do with American manufacturing. The product was a joke, I doubt it sold in quantities large enough to make it even worth anything. Nobody is paying $22K for a 55" TV with touchscreen.

    I bet the only ones they sold were to cable news channels as that's the only place I've ever seen them.

    1. Re:It's the product not the manufacturing location by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 2

      The 55" is $9k, the 84" is $22k.

    2. Re:It's the product not the manufacturing location by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      And companies are definitely buying this stuff. We have a bunch at our offices, not MS though but I'd imagine they cost about as much.

      In any case, it's just over a hundred jobs so hardly important overall when we just heard that MS is laying off thousands of employees in other areas, in particular sales. Would be interesting to know what motivated the decision anyway though.

    3. Re:It's the product not the manufacturing location by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      And companies are definitely buying this stuff. We have a bunch at our offices, not MS though but I'd imagine they cost about as much.

      In any case, it's just over a hundred jobs so hardly important overall when we just heard that MS is laying off thousands of employees in other areas, in particular sales. Would be interesting to know what motivated the decision anyway though.

      This is how US corporations breath. They expand and contract over time, accreting new projects and products and groups. Then the CEO gets a boner for efficiency and all the satellite offices and pet projects and stupid low volume products get axed. Then it starts all over again. Remaining employed in a large US corporation is partly a matter of not being in one of the dispensable limbs when it comes to chopping time.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  8. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I still count this as a win for the H1Bs. Take American jobs, without the inconvenience of leaving your home country!
    Oregonians without jobs can't buy Surfaces, M$.

  9. No big deal, the future American Renaissance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clean American coal, always made in America

    1. Re:No big deal, the future American Renaissance by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

      The new coal mines are for the manufacture of steel. Please tell me how to make steel without coal.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    2. Re:No big deal, the future American Renaissance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most modern steel mills use electrical arcs to smelt instead of coke derived from coal

    3. Re:No big deal, the future American Renaissance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had no idea you could replace the carbon in the iron/carbon alloy known as steel, with a mere electrical charge. Cool. So, do these electrical arcs pull carbon atoms in from a parallel dimension or do they reconfigure local sub-atomic particles into ready-made steel?

    4. Re:No big deal, the future American Renaissance by dj245 · · Score: 1

      The new coal mines are for the manufacture of steel. Please tell me how to make steel without coal.

      According to my Fundamentals of Metallurgy (ISBN 978-1-85573-927-7), metal oxides are most often reduced by carbon monoxide CO, or sometimes hydrogen. The reactions needed to refine iron oxide (iron ore) into iron involve both melting the ore and adding CO. Iron occurs predominantly in nature as hematite, Fe2O3. The reduction reactions include:
      3Fe2O3 + CO --> 2Fe3O4 + CO2
      Fe3O4 + CO --> 3FeO + CO2
      Fe2O3 + 3CO --> 2Fe + 3CO2
      Fe2O3 + 3H2 --> 2Fe + 3H2O
      FeO + CH4 --> Fe + 2H2 + CO
      3Fe2O3 + 5H2 + 2CH4 --> 2Fe3C + 9H2O
      FeO + CO --> Fe + CO2

      The above includes reactions using CO, H2, and CH4 (natural gas). Not all reactions are used in each process. Coal gasification and natural gas reforming are convenient and economical ways to generate the CO and/or H2 to process iron ore, but neither of these fossil fuels is strictly required for the redox reactions used to manufacture steel.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    5. Re:No big deal, the future American Renaissance by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Most modern steel mills use electrical arcs to smelt instead of coke derived from coal

      You still need a large quantity of either CO or H2 to reduce iron ore into iron. Coal gasification and natural gas reforming are convenient and economical ways to produce these gasses. They are not the only ways, but they may well be the only economically competitive ways at the current time.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  10. Moving to China because ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The profit margin on the $22k Surface Hub wasn't quite high enough using U.S. employees.

    Don't be fooled by your company's slogans; "profits" not "employees" are the company's most valuable asset. Remember what Veronica said in Better Off Ted (S1 E4: "Racial Sensitivity"), which was refreshingly honest:

    "Money before people," that's the company motto. Engraved on the lobby floor. It just looks more heroic in Latin.

    [ And, no, I'm not against companies making money, but there's more to it than that. ]

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Moving to China because ... by pefisher · · Score: 1

      That show, Better off Ted, was great.

    2. Re:Moving to China because ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The issue is probably not labour cost, it's likely supply. If you want to make a device like the Surface Hub, you need a massive LCD panel for a start. So either you carefully ship some massive LCD panels all the way from the factory in China/Korea/Japan or you just assemble the whole thing over there into a handy protective chassis. And if one panel fails QA you just get your supplier to send another one overnight.

      It's a cascade failure. Once you get rid of a few key suppliers in one country, it becomes much harder to make other stuff, so that moves too... And the only way to reverse it is to coordinate starting multiple new businesses to build everything you need.

      Tesla is having some success. Created demand for batteries, now owns a battery factory. Gotta be confident you are going to sell a lot of batteries though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  11. Re:No Worries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Microsoft moved its factory to China. We can't trust them. Sad."

  12. Why is any of this surprising by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Microsoft tried to make some Surface units in the U.S. because they thought of it as marketing.

    Microsoft has ended the local manufacturing because the marketing doesn't seem to be returning the cost of the effort.

    In short, Microsoft never actually cared about helping to regain some manufacturing in the U.S. They just wanted to *look* like they cared. None of it is a surprise in any way.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why is any of this surprising by Kaenneth · · Score: 1, Troll

      Trumpsters /say/ "Buy American!" then go shopping at Wal*Mart.

    2. Re:Why is any of this surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh for the mod points....

    3. Re:Why is any of this surprising by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Again, manufacturing in the US wasn't a Microsoft idea. The Surface Hub is just a relabled Perceptive Pixel touchscreen; Microsoft got the factory when they bought out Perceptive Pixel. They were just waiting for the right time to shift the manufacturing to China, where Microsoft manufacturers every other piece of hardware it sells.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  13. T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Large trade imbalances are a problem; not just for jobs, but because the financial imbalances it causes, and a host of other risks. For example, if we gut our manufacturing base, we could have insufficient manufacturing facilities during an extended war. Venezuela's problems have a Yuuuge lesson: don't put all your economic eggs in one basket. Variety is a backup system, even if it causes short-term inefficiencies.

    BUT, Trump is doing it wrong; or at least not in a coordinated way.

    An imbalance penalty tariff should be applied to trade with a level based on the imbalance amount: the bigger the imbalance, the bigger the penalty. We'd have to tell the WTO to shove it, though; or get them to change the rules.

    However, the penalty shouldn't suddenly be applied in full, but gradually ramped up to give the country and companies time to adjust. We don't want to shock the system. Trump doesn't have the patience for gradual ramp-ups; and the full effect may outlast a presidential term even. It would have to be a coordinated political effort.

    1. Re: T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Yay the market is efficiently moving spending power away from its major market. What could possibly go wrong?

    2. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by imgod2u · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Penalties are the wrong way to go about it, period. You don't get an industry that's healthy by shielding it from competition. I can't believe I, as a liberal, have to explain this. All you get from erecting barriers to competition is lazy, complacent industries that offer no benefit.

      Foreign competition *is* good competition. Any competition is good as it increases the incentive for improvement.

      If you want to prop up your local industry in some area (and I'm agreeing that is a worthy goal), the most economically efficient ways to do that is worker training and infrastructure development. A business that's able to setup shop, hire the needed workers and have all of the communications, transportation, logistics and property protection will locate itself there. The price difference of wages is peanuts on their balance sheet.

      Want to know why people locate to Shenzhen? Go there. The actual wages there are pretty damn high actually and the cost of living rivals most of the US. But if you have an idea for a gadget or product, you're up and running in easily 1/10th of the time it takes in the US and to ramp up production to the millions? That ain't happening anywhere in the US.

    3. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tariffs only hurt everyone involved.

      The theory assumes proverbial spherical cows. You ignored my war scenario, for one. Going back to the Venezuela example, just because oil is currently your country's Comparative Advantage at a given point in time does not mean it will stay that way. If the bottom falls out of oil, your population starves. There's also the risk of financial bubbles due to uneven exchanges caused by imbalance.

      And, tariffs are NOT the end-goal; but rather balance. Tariffs are an encouragement tool. Countries like China may loosen up imports or business regulation that previously made things hard on other countries' businesses. Right now it's too difficult to micromanage the barriers they put up. General tariffs would encourage them to loosen barriers on their own without an army of lawyers needed to sue away each and every barrier.

    4. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 0

      Penalties are the wrong way to go about it, period. You don't get an industry that's healthy by shielding it from competition. I can't believe I, as a liberal, have to explain this. All you get from erecting barriers to competition is lazy, complacent industries that offer no benefit.

      To many on the left, you are not a liberal if you believe that.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    5. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, since you are willing to step away from academics, let's look at the nitty gritty

      In the real world, tariffs lead to trade-wars which lead to real wars, which waste a terrible amount of blood and treasure

    6. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you do not know or speak to many liberals and instead depend in right-wing propaganda to describe them to you.

      You can google 'Bill Clinton rising tide raises all boats' to help you to understand a liberal policy to trade

      Thank you

    7. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by LS1+Brains · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You say you're a liberal, but you're way too supportive of free market principals for today's crop of "liberals." Welcome to the R's.

    8. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      OK, since you are willing to step away from academics, let's look at the nitty gritty

      In the real world, tariffs lead to trade-wars which lead to real wars, which waste a terrible amount of blood and treasure

      Having the middle class decline into poverty can also cause revolutions. Revolutions could also be described as a wasting a terrible amount of blood and treasure. One good speaker could take the anger which has never really been addressed from the 2008 crash and create a revolution. Trump is very mild to how it might have gone. If the middle class continues to decline expect Trump to look mild compared to future rulers.

    9. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by ExEm2SS · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I'm afraid of. Even worse, what if the person who lights the spark is the next Hitler?

    10. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 0

      Actually, I speak to many liberals. I also watch many liberals speak to each other. And I see many liberals proclaim that others are not liberals based on statements such as the one I responded to.

      Maybe you need to speak to more liberals.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    11. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      Want to know why people locate to Shenzhen? Go there. The actual wages there are pretty damn high actually and the cost of living rivals most of the US. But if you have an idea for a gadget or product, you're up and running in easily 1/10th of the time it takes in the US and to ramp up production to the millions? That ain't happening anywhere in the US.

      I don't believe that wages and costs of living are even close to parity. This US government site says that even though Chinese wages are indeed increasingly much faster than in the US, US wages would still be 4 times higher even three years from now, i.e., there is currently about an order of magnitude difference in wages. Costs of living comparisons from just about any online cost of living website show that living costs in Shenzhen are about half of the costs in the cheapest US cities.

      There is probably some truth in the idea that China sometimes offers fewer regulatory barrier to manufacturing. However, some significant part of those lower barriers is based in turning a blind eye to abuses of working conditions, the environment, product quality/safety, etc.

    12. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by ebh · · Score: 1

      s/liberal/neoliberal/

      FTFY

    13. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by imgod2u · · Score: 1

      This is the problem with using a label to try to break down everyone's views. The Democratic party, at least, were far more along Clinton's moderate pro-market liberals beliefs. But there are definitely hard-line liberals who hate that moderate position and view it as "you might as well be Republican".

      What I've noticed is a sort of sea change in US politics lately. What *should* be conservative values such as free trade have become the demons to rail against. Trump was merely the manifestation of these changing moods.

    14. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by imgod2u · · Score: 0

      The D's have had the most free market President in the past 2 decades though. Especially compared to who has an (R) next to his name now....

    15. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by imgod2u · · Score: 5, Informative

      I said Shenzhen. Not China. The thing people even in the US can't grasp is just how *vast* China's population is.

      You can hop on the high-speed rail, cross 150 miles (in about 40 min) and go from bustling metropolis (Google for housing prices in Shenzhen, it's about comparable to San Diego) to a dirt-poor village. The income and cost of living difference can easily be 10-100x.

      Of course, on a pure average level, China as a whole is still well behind the US in terms of income and cost of living.

      But most companies who setup shop in China for at least skilled work (and there's a lot, increasingly more) are doing so in large cities with comparable costs of living to the US. And there's a reason they locate there. It's so easy to setup shop.

      Also, I never mentioned regulation when it comes to "setting up shop". Because for the most part, regulations are a 2nd order effect. Companies will live with more or less regulations unless they're insane ones.

      The biggest draw of Shenzhen is infrastructure and talent pool. We don't have enough mid-skilled tinkerers in the US. It's either poorly trained grunts or highly trained (and highly paid) professionals. You want basic CAD drawings, a simple business plan or just some entry-level technicians? Good luck hiring enough in the US. And even if you find them in the US, they require relocation packages.

      In Shenzhen, you get millions of semi-skilled people traveling 100+ miles one way to go to a job. In less time than a typical Bay Area commute.

      Compared to the effect of those, regulations are noise.

    16. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know Hitler, bitch snowflake ... you can't even imagine ...

    17. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You're not a liberal, you're a neo-liberal. The essence of globalization is: labor is commoditized as mobile capital is free to roam the globe for the lowest cost labor. In contrast, labor is far less mobile, and unable to shift as fluidly and frictionlessly as capital to exploit scarcities and opportunities. Neoliberalism--the opening of markets and borders--enables capital to effortlessly crush labor. The social democrats, in embracing open borders, have institutionalized an open immigration that shreds the scarcity value of domestic labor in favor of lower cost immigrant labor that serves capital's desire for lower costs.

      For someone who is professional class, someone who has a nice income and who does NOT make their income from labor but from providing intellectual services (doctors, lawyers, teachers, white collar work in general) then neoliberalism is overall a plus. THEIR job is usually not threatened by foreign trade(H1B cases being a big exception) and their costs go down as labor wages go down due to the cheap products flooding in.

      However, if you are an average working class American, then your incomes and your throats are being cut by the huge influx of cheap labor. Working class jobs are being destroyed by low income labor at one end and automation at the other, leaving working class voters angry and broke and with no place to go.

      That's where the backlash is coming from, and that's why so many upper income people can't see any problem with it. It's the old old problem of the landed gentry and the nobility looking down their noses at all of those stinking whining peasants, all over again.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    18. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by imgod2u · · Score: 1

      "The essence of globalization is: labor is commoditized as mobile capital is free to roam the globe for the lowest cost labor."

      You forgot to add: and prices go down for consumers. That is, everyone.

      However, if you are an average working class American, then your incomes and your throats are being cut by the huge influx of cheap labor. Working class jobs are being destroyed by low income labor at one end and automation at the other, leaving working class voters angry and broke and with no place to go.
      That's where the backlash is coming from, and that's why so many upper income people can't see any problem with it. It's the old old problem of the landed gentry and the nobility looking down their noses at all of those stinking whining peasants, all over again.

      I don't know what you think "average working class American" really is, but:

      http://www.ranker.com/list/mos...

      Seems to indicate plenty of semi-skilled services fields. You are correct that at the very low-end, workers are displaced by open trade and open border. But I suspect those jobs are going to be replaced by automation anyway.

      The US simply is a much more service-oriented economy now. And in the coming decades, it'll be even more so. Notice how so many of the most common jobs in the US are things like sales, education, healthcare (nurses, pharmacists, clinic workers) and restaurants? That's your *real* "average working class" nowadays.

      The caricature of the displaced grunt laborer as the "real American" and everyone else as "uppidy landed gentry" is just that: a caricature. It was unfortunate that it also happens to resonate with a (small) demographic who were in key voting districts in 2016.

      But let's dispel this myth that the displaced coal miner or factory worker is the "real average working class American" who are the majority being oppressed by the greedy minority of "white collar workers".

      That hasn't been true in 2 decades. The US is *mostly* white collar workers today. And it benefits hugely from open trade (and would from open borders).

    19. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      I said Shenzhen. Not China. The thing people even in the US can't grasp is just how *vast* China's population is.

      Fair enough. China does have more people, but Americans are also well acquainted with income disparities. :)

      So, looking at average annual wages for manufacturing jobs in Shenzhen vs. the US (assuming a 6.76 RMB to USD exchange rate), the US wages are about $61k compared to $15.5k in Shenzhen or about 4x. Perhaps if you compare the high-end tail in Shenzhen to the low-end tail in the US, the wages might start being comparable.

    20. Re: T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Look at Britain for an example of that. No real auto manufacturers left. Except for a couple of token plants owned by foreign companies. Which are there because cars have the steering wheel and gas exhaust on the opposite side of nearly everywhere else. Still even Poland has more car factories than Britain. Britain basically survives on North Sea oil and stock market swindles.

      Well I'm exaggerating a bit. Rolls Royce still manufactures aircraft engines. Thankfully the Conservative government back in 1971 was smart enough to save the company from bankruptcy. Afterwards RR was able to produce the RB211 aircraft engine. Thank God Thatcher wasn't the PM back then or else even RR wouldn't be left anymore.

    21. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by imgod2u · · Score: 2

      I said Shenzhen. Not China. The thing people even in the US can't grasp is just how *vast* China's population is.

      Fair enough. China does have more people, but Americans are also well acquainted with income disparities. :)

      Your average corporate mid-level manager in the US makes what? 4-8x what a grunt worker would? 30k vs 120k?

      Imagine that your mid-level managers in all of those factories make 100x what a farmer only 40min away makes. Or 10-20x what the technician who travels 40 min a day (one way) makes. That's a level of wealth disparity that's common place in every street in Chinese cities but pretty rare in the US.

      So, looking at average annual wages for manufacturing jobs in Shenzhen vs. the US (assuming a 6.76 RMB to USD exchange rate), the US wages are about $61k compared to $15.5k in Shenzhen or about 4x. Perhaps if you compare the high-end tail in Shenzhen to the low-end tail in the US, the wages might start being comparable.

      Right, there is still definitely a disparity. But it's not orders of magnitude anymore. As was my original comment. Also keep in mind that what counts as "manufacturing job" in Shenzhen is very different than what a typical American "manufacturing job" is today. The American counterparts are much more skilled. But in return they are paid more and there are relatively few of them. There is no room in the US economy for low-to-mid skilled, mass-producing but lowly paid workers. And those are on the decline. We've legislated that out of our economy (for good reasons).

    22. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      Your average corporate mid-level manager in the US makes what? 4-8x what a grunt worker would? 30k vs 120k?

      Imagine that your mid-level managers in all of those factories make 100x what a farmer only 40min away makes. Or 10-20x what the technician who travels 40 min a day (one way) makes. That's a level of wealth disparity that's common place in every street in Chinese cities but pretty rare in the US.

      Unfortunately, here in Silicon Valley, 10-20x income disparities are not uncommon at all. :(

    23. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Having the middle class decline into poverty can also cause revolutions.

      Our trade imbalance arguably led to Trump being elected, which is arguably a mini-revolution in that traditional candidates were rejected. Many swing states happened to be in the rust-belt, which has been hit hardest by lopsided trade. Factories moved out en mass. The anger over loss of factory jobs is a big factor in T's election. Had the USA been more protectionist, the rust belt may not have rusted nearly as much.

      Perhaps stuff would be more expensive for consumers, but that doesn't tick people off nearly as much as job loss. "More jobs!" is a much more common campaign promise the world over than "cheaper shit!" (outside of houses, food, and medical care, which trade affects much less anyhow.)

    24. Re: T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by fubarrr · · Score: 1

      A rare pick and place machine/cnc programmer can make 30k per month, same with welders with specialty, industrial chemists, metalurgists,

    25. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China doesn't have a large trade imbalance with the world, just America. Maybe you need to realize America is the problem here. Make stuff that the Chinese want. They already spend more on movies than the US. Find other things they want and sell them to them. You know capitalism free market stuff.

    26. Re: T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      ...and thank God that the UK Government underwrote the bribes to foreign governments - using taxpayers' money - to secure the manufacturing contracts that keep RR going.

    27. Re:T is doing it wrong [Re:No Worries.] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You don't get an industry that's healthy by shielding it from competition. All you get from erecting barriers to competition is lazy, complacent industries that offer no benefit.

      You mean like what our competitors are doing?

  14. Why the West Coast? by Zorro · · Score: 1

    There are PLENTY of poor American in West Virginia and eastern Ohio who can work cheap.

    It isn't the USA that is unaffordable, it is the coasts and cities that are unaffordable.

    1. Re:Why the West Coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      low population densities, poor infrastructure, low education

  15. We have two where I work by dstyle5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We have two at work (one 84" and one 55") and so far they have worked pretty well for what they are supposed to do. It is up to management to decide if it was worth the cost in the end, but so far I haven't see any issues with them. Other companies MMV of course, but we have a lot of remote employees so it has worked out well for company wide video conferencing, white board for meetings, connecting laptops to it, etc.

    1. Re:We have two where I work by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      At $22000, it better be doing a lot more than that.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    2. Re:We have two where I work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At $22000, it better be doing a lot more than that.

      Be a professional. Run some numbers.

      Meetings are dull, uneventful, and generally not wort the time. But technology makes things more efficient, generally. Technological people are even more productive when given neat tech.

      Imagine a typical development group of about ten people. Employees costing 50 an hour on average, having three or more one hour meetings a week. The cost would equate to around 75,000 per year. Surface hubs would pay itself off in one year if those meetings were merely 30% more productive.

      Could a giant touchscreen computer in a meeting room make those meetings 30% more productive? Considering everything could be recorded and plans drawn up could be reused later instead of recreated, and with the experience that the majority of meeting time is wasted with followup questions about the meeting being asked later, 30% is an easy target to achieve. With a decent workflow, 70-80% more productivity is likely.

    3. Re:We have two where I work by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      The version from China will cost a fraction of that.

    4. Re:We have two where I work by avandesande · · Score: 2

      I've worked at places that had videoconferencing teams of several people. If this thing manages itself 22k sounds cheap.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  16. Capacity issue? by sttlmark · · Score: 1

    It may simply be the case that Wilsonville's capacity can't meet the demand. You can't even buy a Hub on the Microsoft store right now, and Ars wrote that MS was caught off guard by the popularity.

  17. oh look, the free market doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's almost as if the free market didn't care for sentimental bullshit like "made in Oregon"...

    1. Re:oh look, the free market doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Correct. People scream bloody murder about the offshoring of jobs, and then head to Walmart to buy more cheap Chinese shit.

      And every morning they run their Chinese-made American flag up the flagpole while thinking about what a good American they are. The American dream is dead and Americans have no one to blame but themselves, as they enabled ALL of it.

    2. Re:oh look, the free market doesn't care by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      it's almost as if the free market didn't care for sentimental bullshit like "made in Oregon"...

      And yet the CPUs are made in Oregon.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:oh look, the free market doesn't care by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Turns out labor costs are trivial compared to the cost of building a $2 billion fab. Fabs don't even last forever, I believe they are decomissioning the Aloha fab, which I think was the first one they built in Oregon.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  18. The tax credit check cleared by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >> The company hasn't explained, in public or to its Wilsonville employees, why it gave up on domestic manufacturing so quickly

    I'm guessing the factory was built to collect an Oregon tax credit or to otherwise mollify some state-level lawmakers. Now that the tax credit has been cashed in (or related legislative/regulatory policy has been created/averted), it's time to pull the plug.

    Or maybe this was just the minimum time required to figure out and outsource all manufacturing. There's a June 2015 NYTimes article which pretty much said the same when the factory opened (via acquisition):

    "Mr. Hix had a downbeat assessment for what would happen to the manufacturing of the Surface Hub if the product took off and the production process was refined. 'Once they get all the problems out of it, it will go offshore,' he said."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/11/technology/microsoft-picks-unusual-place-to-make-its-giant-touch-screen-the-us.html

    1. Re:The tax credit check cleared by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Oregon has always been a hub for high tech manufacturing (at least in the past it has) there's a lot of expertise and know-how here. Specifically Wilsonville is where Tektronix used to manufacture a lot of goods (including the Phaser printer) and where Mentor Graphics also spun off from Tek. Nearby Hillsboro is where Intel makes/designs a lot of components as well. Also somewhat nearby (within 2 hours) is where HP-Corvallis manufactured a huge amount of electronics including the HP wristwatch, and most all Calculators/Printers before Carly became CEO. She may have got the investors an extra 8-10% on return by moving everything offshore, but I know a lot of people personally who used to work entry level jobs there (it's not uncommon to have 2 years of technical training at a community college doing curriculum designed by the company and go straight to work assuming you graduate - Intel still does this with Portland Community Colege). FEI also makes Electron Microscopes here (or at least used to)

      It's not uncommon to find some esoteric component or part used in making semiconductors at the local Goodwill (last thing I saw was a Polaroid/Tek branded camera used to photograph waveforms for tech writing).

      I think the reason it was abandoned is because there's simply not enough market interest in a $20,000 tablet/display :(. It is kind of sad to see these manufacturing jobs leaving the state, but to be honest politicians (especially in DC) really don't think electronics when they think Made in America. I don't think a single high tech item was mentioned by Trump during his made in America PR event this week.

    2. Re:The tax credit check cleared by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      HP has completely abandoned the Corvalis campus, as far as I know. Nice campus, hopefully many other tech companies are leasing space there now.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:The tax credit check cleared by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The factory was inherited from Perceptive Pixel when they bought them out, not built by Microsoft. Was Perceptive Pixel doing manufacturing in Wilsonville for tax credits? Probably. I worked there, and all other hardware Microsoft sold was manufactured in China, including the pens used with the touch screen. So I frequently wondered when they were going to move the touchscreen manufacturing itself to China. Problem was, they had to fill the warehouses with unsold product first, so they could afford to shut down for a couple months to move product without impacting availability of the product. About the time I left a couple months ago, the warehouses were full to capacity, and the double shifts were being phased out.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re: The tax credit check cleared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only person here with actual info and insight needs to be modded up. All the +4 and +5 comments here are idle speculation except for yours.

  19. Cable News Channels AND NCIS by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    cable news channels as that's the only place I've ever seen them

    and on NCIS re-runs. Investigations into homicides and counter-terrorism; but the show seemed pretty convincing as a career that won't get outsourced, believe it or not.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  20. At this price point it should be made in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beverly Hills. Chinese version of it should go for $500, or do not buy!

    1. Re:At this price point it should be made in by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The product starts with an 84" 4K television set, which costs about $8000. Meaning it would be rather difficult to create a finished product that costs less than that after adding touch screen sensor, Windows PC, stereo speakers, 2 WiFi routers, 2 cameras, etc.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  21. Re:No Worries. by GLMDesigns · · Score: 0

    What are you a racist European with that "Lazy Fat fuck american" line?

    Regarding obesity you do realize that the US is not in the TOP 10 list of the most obese countries, second countries like China are climbing up that "obesity" ladder real quick, and third obesity is measured by BMI which makes basically everyone who lifts weights "overweight".

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  22. Why? For the PR by Dracos · · Score: 1

    Companies move manufacturing offshore due to labor costs. Less labor cost, more profit. Since the 80s, employees have been considered liabilities or cost sinks rather than assets.

    Companies who hype up domestic manufacturing attempts are most likely doing it for the PR. Google did it when they opened the Motorola plant in Texas.

    1. Re:Why? For the PR by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Obvious solution: increase the transportation costs so that it costs more to ship the raw materials to China and finished good back to the US than they can save on labor costs. This has actually worked for the North Carolina furniture industry; apparently shipping costs exceed labor costs so now the furniture manufacturing is coming back to the state.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  23. The way of the world by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    "Why???"

    "Well, Donald Trump wants us to stay, so we've gotta go."

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  24. Re:No Worries. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    Panos Panay.....

    Hmm, not a very American sounding name, is it...?

    Just saying.....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  25. We need some slack in the system by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dealing with technical people all the time, it never ceases to amaze me how few understand life outside their little comfort zone. Any time they have to deal with someone who's lower-skilled than themselves, it's an annoyance and they run back to their crowd as soon as they can. Just like a lot of people say everyone should have at least one menial job serving food, working retail or otherwise dealing with the public, I think it would do smart people a world of good to put in some time working in a social services office. Doing so may reveal to smart people that the vast majority of the world is not like them, and may convince them that we shouldn't shoot for 100% optimization if that leaves out a huge swath of the population.

    The truth is that we need something at the level of a manufacturing job, that delivers a lower-middle class salary, has regular hours and can be done by people of average intelligence. I know AI is being overhyped now, but the vast majority of white collar corporate jobs are up for replacement next as well. Unless you want society to break down, you're going to need to give people jobs. I grew up in a Rust Belt city and watched every large factory move to the South or overseas, leaving a burnt-out shell of a city. Not Detroit-level, but it's only now coming back. You need employers like this to give work to the masses who can't be big data scientists or work in engineering.

    Feel free to call me a Luddite, but leaving some slack in the system will be the only way to preserve it. We're at the point where people can't just move up to the next better job when automation takes theirs. For better or worse, most people are doing the equivalent of factory work, including corporate types.

    1. Re:We need some slack in the system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      We used to have everything you describe in your second paragraph.... And then the unions came along demanding premium wages and benefits for "menial" work.

    2. Re:We need some slack in the system by Repentinus · · Score: 2

      Feel free to call me a Luddite, but leaving some slack in the system will be the only way to preserve it.

      Why should we want to preserve the system? I would rather have my tax money spent on enabling people to give up meaningless jobs and paint, sing, dance, write, garden, hike, bike, paddle, or do whatever else floats their boat instead.

    3. Re:We need some slack in the system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The truth is that we need something at the level of a manufacturing job, that delivers a lower-middle class salary, has regular hours and can be done by people of average intelligence.

      I agree with you about the last two parts about regular hours, and people of average intelligence, and possibly the part about lower-middle class wages, though I'd aim higher for wages.

      I just don't know what those jobs are, and how they can survive competition from automation. Someone in the world is going to automate the manufacturing. You just can't avoid that. I think eventually the automation is going to make the labor costs differences insignificant between the US and China, so we might get some jobs back, but the massive increases in productivity from robot manufacturing is going to mean it's largely a machine-supervisory role, and MUCH fewer jobs.

      It's sort of like the shift from farm jobs to manufacturing jobs that happened in around the 10s to 40s. Manufacturing jobs are nothing like farm jobs, but they both require some average intelligence and learning abilities.

      Frankly, we should start regulating this "gig economy" more. They're OK jobs, but don't have regular hours, and are exploited like manufacturing was in the 20s through the 40s.

    4. Re:We need some slack in the system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The people who still have to work will never allow this. It's a great idea, but only works if everyone doesn't have to work. The second that's not the case, you'll have massive resentment of those who can do their own thing by the ones who are stuck doing a job someone needs to do.

    5. Re:We need some slack in the system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh. The Utopian dream. Have a personal robot go and do your job for you so that you can go on perpetual vacation while still collecting a steady paycheck. Reality. The employer figures out that he can own the robot instead and cut you completely out of the deal. Now you are unemployed with NO income. You spend your days lobbying government to provide you something like UBI so that you don't starve.

    6. Re:We need some slack in the system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah yes, curse those unions. How dare they lay the standard down for a 40 hour work week, push for OSHA laws that protect your physical safety at work.

      Even if you've never worked a union job in your life, you've enjoyed the benefits of the worker protection that is now federal law that didn't exist before they fought for them.

    7. Re:We need some slack in the system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Easy solution. Everyone work less. Twenty hour weeks and there is work for twice as many.

    8. Re:We need some slack in the system by Altus · · Score: 1

      This is why a tax on robot labor has been proposed... its not the only way to deal with the problem of wholesale replacement of low skill labor with robots, but its one way

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  26. Re:No Worries. by sycodon · · Score: 3, Funny

    H-1B.

    They couldn't find any Americans to lay off 124 workers.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  27. Everything is going overseas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a major us investing house to manage my assets, and recently my financial planner went away and now I deal online-only with a financial planner in India.

    I'm seriously considering ditching my engineering career and going into construction, building maintenance, or some other thing that absolutely requires a physical presence in the US. Then again, homes will be built by robots eventually...

    1. Re:Everything is going overseas by avandesande · · Score: 1

      A house is being built right now in the lot next door to me and the mariachi music is filtering through my window as I type. Good luck with the construction job....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  28. Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by sycodon · · Score: 5, Informative

    When someone can pick up a plant from China and plop it down in WA, pay the same wages, follow the same work rules, dispose of their waste in the same manner, THEN you can say outsourcing is a fair thing to do.

    The fact is that you can't. And you can't for reasons that most people agree are reasonable...health and safety of the workers, environmental protection, workplace environment rules, etc. Most people would agree that these rules are in place for what they might call moral reasons, or, it's the right thing to do.

    But for some reason, it's no longer the right thing to do when that plant is in China or other third world places. Somehow, what is considered immoral pollution here is not immoral pollution in China. Intolerable work environments here are some how perfectly fine in the third world. But, US consumers and manufacturers are more than happy to take advantage of the low costs of product even when that is only possible in a factory that would be sued out of existence were it in the US.

    Outsourcing to China and other places isn't "competition" it's exploitation. But try and do anything about it and you will be called a protectionist or worse.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem becomes how does an American company compete against a foreign company that is not abiding by the same standards? Sure, we could enact tarriffs and prevent import of items not meeting some moral threshold, but then we will also not be able to export (either through retaliatory sanctions or competitive pricing) anything either. It's a very complicated issue.

      Liberals won't want to hear it, but in the push for "equity", we've made ourselves uncompetitive. Higher minimum wage, union short-sightedness and even the idea that everyone should be entitled to be able to afford every little luxury (thus making cheap Chinese imports desirable) have put us in this position.

    2. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you should only by USA made.

    3. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Liberals didn't invent outsourcing and they sure as hell haven't made us uncompetitive. They didn't decide to make corporations start ignoring their communities in favor of shareholders or stand by as one industry after the other slowly drifted south to Mexico and then overseas. Find another scapegoat.

    4. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do I do that when many of the things I need -- not just want, but need -- are simply no longer made in the USA?

    5. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by WilliamGeorge · · Score: 1

      Just do it as much as you can. If you need something, check to see if anyone makes it in the US. Then, if not the US look for other first-world countries (where living and environmental standards should be decent). If not, look for anywhere *but* China. Only buy stuff made in China if that is truly the only option.

      I try to do this as much as possible, though a number of things I buy (especially tech stuff) are still only made in China.

      --
      William George
    6. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      To a large degree these differences have been shrinking. Wages have risen in the Chinese coastal areas and the pollution standards in China have been becoming increasingly more tight. The main issue I think is lack of inspections in China. Plus the fact that these factories have more economies of scale because the production is concentrated there. I doubt it would be much more expensive if Microsoft moved the line to the USA. Other companies have been able to do it.

    7. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And does that warm fuzzy feeling counteract all the nice things you are missing out on? Do you really enjoy making rich people richer, rather than letting poorer people eat? I supose if you've got yours...typical American attitude.

    8. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only problem if you relocate the factory, all the American snowflakes don't like to do hard work and you'd need to train them up from scratch anyway. The factory now has to pay higher taxes, healthcare, getting sued because the wheelchair ramp is 2 mm too narrow, everything else. Has to import all it's materials from the other side of the planet. The workers at the factory can' afford the high cost of food and housing.

    9. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Trump will try to bring jobs back to the U.S. (which he is already doing), so he must be 'bad', right? That's the official narrative - Trump is 'bad', even though what he is doing is trying to bring more jobs back to the U.S.

    10. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      The problem becomes how does an American company compete against a foreign company that is not abiding by the same standards?

      We aren't supposed to compete on prices for labor-intensive manufacturing. We are supposed to out-innovate to a degree that creates wealth that flows. But for that we need safety nets for people with lesser means and to reduce the personal risk involved in going solo/entrepreneurial. And we need a systematic approach to cultivate our human capital, to develop a workforce more educated than other competing countries have.

      If a labor-intensive worker in the US does not have a competitive advantage in terms of education or output against a labor-intensive worker in China, then shit dude, the last thing we want is to try to compete in prices for labor-intensive, low-value-added products.

      Forget safety and labor regulations for a moment. Do you think for a moment that if China had the same type of regulations we do, that their cost of operations would be the same as ours????? No, they wouldn't. They'll still be cheaper.

      Cost of labor and regulation aren't the bulk of cost. After all, Japan is expensive and still they out-manufactured us.

      The problems are deeper than just "fair competition and regulations."

      Try harder.

    11. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, the supply chain savings are probably too much low hanging fruit for the bean counters to resist; when (I'm estimating) 99% of the components in your device come from Asia, any "value oriented" manager will immediately question why they are being packed and shipped to North America. Same goes for production machines and tools.

    12. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      When someone can pick up a plant from China and plop it down in WA, pay the same wages, follow the same work rules, dispose of their waste in the same manner, THEN you can say outsourcing is a fair thing to do.

      The fact is that you can't. And you can't for reasons that most people agree are reasonable...health and safety of the workers, environmental protection, workplace environment rules, etc. Most people would agree that these rules are in place for what they might call moral reasons, or, it's the right thing to do.

      But for some reason, it's no longer the right thing to do when that plant is in China or other third world places. Somehow, what is considered immoral pollution here is not immoral pollution in China. Intolerable work environments here are some how perfectly fine in the third world. But, US consumers and manufacturers are more than happy to take advantage of the low costs of product even when that is only possible in a factory that would be sued out of existence were it in the US.

      Outsourcing to China and other places isn't "competition" it's exploitation. But try and do anything about it and you will be called a protectionist or worse.

      Well, if that idiot industrial toady that Trump appointed to be head of the EPA, Scott Pruitt, has anything to say about it (and unfortunately, he does), maybe those pesky environmental laws that make us "non-competitive" will all be repealed, and we'll all be on the way to Make America Great Again!
      [/sarcasm]

    13. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      The problem becomes how does an American company compete against a foreign company that is not abiding by the same standards? Sure, we could enact tarriffs and prevent import of items not meeting some moral threshold, but then we will also not be able to export (either through retaliatory sanctions or competitive pricing) anything either. It's a very complicated issue.

      Liberals won't want to hear it, but in the push for "equity", we've made ourselves uncompetitive. Higher minimum wage, union short-sightedness and even the idea that everyone should be entitled to be able to afford every little luxury (thus making cheap Chinese imports desirable) have put us in this position.

      But the alternative gives us things like Rivers that catch on fire...

    14. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by ChoosyBeggar · · Score: 1

      Do shut up. Christ, virtue-signalling over where one chooses to shop? Seriously? Go fuck yourself.

    15. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he's anonymously virtue signalling....
      Seriously, buy a logic.

    16. Re:Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course being a choosy beggar isn't any for of virtue signaling is it...
      Yea, of course, you were doing it before it was cool.

    17. Re: Outsourcing vs. Protectionism by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Yes they did. The left championed with the idea that a rising tide raises all boats.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  29. Re:No Worries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What is an "American sounding name "?
    The majority of Americans are descended from immigrants from all over the world.

    Or are you suggesting they should have been fired by Chief Squatting Eagle ?

  30. Re:No Worries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy shit! You're right, about EVERYTHING!

  31. Re:No Worries. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Chief Squatting Eagle

    Leave him alone. He's just doing his business.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  32. Thanks, Trump! by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Informative

    My previous job was actually working at the Wilsonville factory on the software used to test the Surface Hub before it was shipped. All the factory workers were temps hired through Kelly Services. Almost all of them looked like immigrants to me. They put on double shifts in order to fill the warehouses with unsold product, so now they can shut down for a couple months while they shift production elsewhere. Why were they doing production in the US in the first place? Microsoft got the Surface Hub by buying out Perceptive PIxel, which was manufacturing it's large touchscreen in the same building Microsoft is now shutting down. Also, there was never enough parking at the plant; it was designed as a shipping warehouse. So the city of WIlsonville didn't allow us to use the entire upstairs portion of the building, since there wasn't parking for employees. Kelly services leased 2 buses to bus in factory workers from whereever they had them park.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  33. Welcome to China! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Home of the "American Standard" plumbing manufacturing company!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  34. why China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the hot place for EMS was Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Why bother with high wage China?

  35. Re:No Worries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outlaw the sale of Microsoft products in the USA. MAGA!

  36. Some more of that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America first. You fucking suckers.

  37. Re: No Worries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And fourth, most Americans have giant lard asses from eating burgers three times a day. Face it mate, your country is filled with fat fucks.

  38. Re:No Worries. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    What is an "American sounding name "?

    Mc O'Brian. Fritzenberg. Dopwrzalkaschulski. Cazzopatate.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  39. Supply chain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Final assembly of a product is merely one link in the supply chain. If you want that chain to run smoothly you group as many of those links as closely together as possible.

  40. They weren't wrong. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    Just two years ago, Microsoft cast its Wilsonville factory as the harbinger of a new era in American technology manufacturing.

    It is true - It was a harbinger. Just not the way people thought it was.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  41. The new IBM by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has become like the old IBM. Sell 'reasonably' priced clients, sell lockins to powerful servers to get your work done, 'innovate' exceptionally pricey hardware... But then, there is their XBox division. Hmm...

  42. Moving Jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moving jobs from America to China? Better give Trump a call.

  43. Microsoft's Motto: by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Always Be Evil(sm)