Say Goodbye To Spain's Glorious Three-Hour Lunch Break (citylab.com)

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Say Goodbye To Spain's Glorious Three-Hour Lunch Break (citylab.com)

Posted by ryuzaki0 on Thursday July 20, 2017 @06:40AM from the end-of-good-times dept.

An anonymous reader shares a report: Is the typical Spanish daily schedule about to change forever? For decades, campaigners in the country have complained that the average Spaniard's habit of keeping extremely late hours and taking delightfully long lunch breaks was making everyday life harder for citizens. This week, change could finally be on the way, as 110 professional bodies in Catalonia have signed up to a plan to change the region's daily timetable by 2025, shortening the classic three-hour lunch break so that employees can finish work earlier in the evening. Such a change would radically reshape ordinary people's lives -- and controversially, it could drive a wedge between Catalonia and the rest of Spain, where the national government supports similar changes (and has adopted a shorter break for public offices) but hasn't yet fixed a timetable for action. You could call the plan an end to national harmony, a blessed release for hard-pressed workers, or an attack on the Spanish way of life. Whatever you do, however, don't call it the end of the siesta. That's because the beloved and much-misunderstood Spanish tradition of the afternoon nap more or less died out decades ago. What remained is a highly distinctive national timetable not found in any other European country, where it has often been read as a peculiarly exotic form of madness. The average Spanish working day is certainly unusual in shape. After starting work between 8 and 9 a.m., hungry workers hold out for a lunch break scheduled as late as 1:30 or 2:30. As if in compensation for this long wait, many then stay off-duty for a break of up to three hours, filling it with a protracted multi-course lunch and maybe a stop at a "nap bar." Most stores and many businesses close down until the late afternoon, before a final burst of office hours between 5:30 and 8 (or sometimes 4 to 7). Spaniards then head home at an hour when most people in other countries are cleaning up their dinner dishes, rarely getting food on the table any earlier than 10 p.m. This pushes bedtime past midnight for many.

162 comments

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by barc0001 · 2017-07-20 06:46 · Score: 5, Interesting

Because on the surface it sounds completely insane. Stretching out the work day like that so you're not off until well past nightfall most of the year doesn't sound at all appealing.
1. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by omnichad · 2017-07-20 06:48 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  What's insane is that they decided they still need an 8-hour day. Why not 6 hours with a 3-hour break in the middle? I bet it would be more productive (if not at least equal) than 8 hours with a 1-hour break in the middle.
2. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by XXongo · 2017-07-20 06:48 · Score: 5, Interesting
  
  I wouldn't mind a long break in the middle of the day, and maybe a nap. Doesn't sound insane to me at all.
3. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by HornWumpus · 2017-07-20 06:54 · Score: 5, Informative
  
  Practice started before the invention of AC. Too hot to work, so take a nap.
  
  --
  John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
4. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by __aaclcg7560 · 2017-07-20 07:00 · Score: 1
  
  Unless you're a bus driver with a four-hour morning shift, a four-hour break, and a four-hour afternoon shift.
5. Re: Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:02 · Score: 0
  
  There actually is some benefit when outside temperatures go up to 40 degrees centigrade in the afternoon- that is why a big part of Southern Europe delays afternoon work for the early evening. I think there is a similar pattern in some middle eastern countries (Israel). I guess air conditioning has changed the rules though.
6. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by rogoshen1 · 2017-07-20 07:04 · Score: 1
  
  i don't know, it sounds absolutely fantastic to me. not having to roll out of bed super early, having more time at lunch to eat a proper meal, then time to relax before heading back into work -- letting the 'food coma' pass.
  They probably think our obsession with time is silly too.
  But really.. if something falls into the realm of a tradition, it certainly works on *some* level.
7. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by isj · 2017-07-20 07:06 · Score: 1
  
  If your work is outdoors then it makes sense due to the midday and afternoon heat. This custom carried over from farmers to office work. My observation from Madrid and Rome is that if there is no AC in the office and its a hot climate/season then people tend to take a longer lunch break.
8. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by cayenne8 · 2017-07-20 07:09 · Score: 1
  
  What's insane is that they decided they still need an 8-hour day. Why not 6 hours with a 3-hour break in the middle? I bet it would be more productive (if not at least equal) than 8 hours with a 1-hour break in the middle.
  Hell, most people in the US are working at least an 8 hour day, and not taking a lunch break, but instead eating at their desks.
  I"m glad I work from home now...yes, I eat at my "work place"...but I now have freedom to do it in my own kitchen, or if I wanna really have fun, I can fire up the smoker in the back yard in the morning, and low and slow cook a brisket and have ready for dinner, or rotisserie a chicken on the ceramic cooker out back...for lunch.
  I do like being able to do that, and with a headset on, you can teleconference while you're sautÃ©ing something on the stove.
  But wow...taking 3 hours off from work during the day....sounds nice, but if I were gone that long from work..I'd NOT want to come back and would have a hard time getting my mindset back on work again.
  
  --
  Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
9. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:14 · Score: 0
  
  Keep in mind though that winter days are relatively long in Spain.
10. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:17 · Score: 0
  
  Or turn on the AC and work through lunch.
11. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:31 · Score: 1
  
  One small problem with that. The part of the day that feels hottest is about an hour after sundown as humidity rises sharply. (and ground and buildings radiate).
  A much better approach to avoid working during the hottest parts of the day is a 4am - 12pm workday. Many North American farmers and fishermen work such hours partly for this reason.
12. Re: Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:32 · Score: 0
  
  Sooooo... Is it a reading comprehension problem or are you just too lazy to read the summary..? It clearly states that they STILL start work between 8 and 9 AM.
13. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by HornWumpus · 2017-07-20 08:03 · Score: 1
  
  Your interpreting local conditions as being universal. In a sunnier, lower humidity environment it's hottest about 6 pm, while the sun is still baking and before the sunset breezes kick up.
  
  --
  John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
14. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by quintesse · 2017-07-20 08:14 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  Ehm, no it's not. You mustn't have been to Spain but I can tell you the hottest time of day is definitely around 2-5pm and in summer you shouldn't be doing any strenuous exercise outside in the sun until let's say 8pm, which is still hours before sundown, when temperatures will have gone done a lot. There are parts of Spain where just walking outside mid-day is an effort and people are most active early in the morning and in the afternoon.
15. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by BarbaraHudson · 2017-07-20 08:26 · Score: 1
  
  The hottest part of the day is between 2 and 3 pm, because of thermal inertia. And now they're getting rid of the 3-hour break just as global warming is going to make it a smart move, or in some areas, a matter of life and death. A heat wave killed almost 15,000 in France. Not normally a place you'd associate with death by heat.
  And it's just going to get worse, when you combine increased high temperatures and an aging population.
  
  --
  "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
16. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by mikael · 2017-07-20 08:32 · Score: 1
  
  They moved to that timetable for the collection of grapes for Silicon Valley wineyards. Only when they needed the cooler temperatures for some solar charged/battery powered automation equipment.
  
  --
  Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
17. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by mikael · 2017-07-20 08:37 · Score: 1
  
  France had a similar schedule. Shops are open 9am to 12am. Then it's lunchtime until 2pm. Then the staff are back working until 7pm. Mainly due to the mid day heat.
  
  --
  Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
18. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by JackieBrown · 2017-07-20 08:42 · Score: 1
  
  I would not want to come back to work after a break like that either. It would also feel like two shifts.
  Regarding the rest of your post, I wish I had your life - or at least work life! I know you worked hard to get to where you are but man, your days just sound amazing.
19. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by skids · 2017-07-20 08:44 · Score: 2
  
  What's insane is the fact that I have to take time off work to do just about everything, because other than restaurants and convenience stores, everyone works the same damn schedule. You'd think if they wanted to restructure things they'd fix that, too, instead of just switching the time of the same damn schedule.
  
  --
  Someone had to do it.
20. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by luis_a_espinal · 2017-07-20 08:46 · Score: 1
  
  I wouldn't mind a long break in the middle of the day, and maybe a nap. Doesn't sound insane to me at all.
  I would. I have children at home to care. If I were to take long breaks, either I'd be home late (and not being able to spend time with my wife and kids), or get up very fucking early for no other reason than to have a long break in the middle of the day.
  Eh, I pass. I can see the appeal to some, though. But for me (or more precisely, my current needs), this is highly inefficient.
21. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by OpenSourced · 2017-07-20 08:55 · Score: 1
  
  Well, it's only for public-oriented business. That's a lot of course, but far from the majority. Public offices are open usually only in the morning, as are banks. Offices do usually a rather standard 9 to 5.
  And the reason for that is convenience. Convenience for the client, of course. You can leave your office work at at about five, then go shopping till eight or nine, or go to the dentist, without having to ask for permission at work or missing a meeting.
  So the custom remains in the business where there is competence and depend on the public. And it won't disappear as people find it convenient. In segments where people's retail business is not so important, like banks, it has already disappeared. But you would have to implant a strong opening-hours curfew to make an effect. If you leave it voluntary, people will vote with their wallets and flock to the open businesses.
  And yes, it's a bitch. I've worked that kind of hours, and it sucks. I even had the unusual luxury of having my flat at a ten minutes' walk from work. So I could go home, eat in peace, have a short siesta certainly, and go back to work. But the workdays felt terribly long, and you went home just ready for bed.
  
  --
  Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
22. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by redmid17 · 2017-07-20 08:56 · Score: 1
  
  Spain is roughly on the same latitude as the northern half of the US. Spain can get hot no doubt, but to think that the US doesn't or is cooler is pretty naiive or foolish.
23. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by pz · 2017-07-20 09:23 · Score: 1
  
  You're forgetting that if you sleep in the middle of the day, you don't need to sleep as much at night. It isn't that the workday is taking up more of your time; it takes up just as much as it would otherwise.
  And if you're NOT sleeping in the middle of the day, but instead using the long lunch period to do stuff, then you're enjoying the day instead of sitting in an office.
  
  --
  
  Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
24. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 09:28 · Score: 0
  
  Disagree completely, there's nothing insane about this at all.
  Spain can be beastly hot, especially the area around Seville. Taking a siesta nap during the hottest part of the day is very practical. Even if you don't sleep, just avoiding exertion and work at this time is a good idea. Yes, air conditioning makes this practice unnecessary, for those who have a/c. So what? If you are a Spanish farmer or rancher, being able to work in a comfy climate controlled office isn't a routine part of your world.
  Spaniards are free to define cultural norms for Spain. What's the problem here? They don't conform to your ideas of normal schedules? Why do the Spanish care about your ideas? Are you going to try convincing the Spanish to give up tapas and flamenco too? Piss off!
  I will admit that I'm a night owl and thus staying up late has real appeal to me. But this is still about Spain and the Spaniards, not about me.
25. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by cheesybagel · 2017-07-20 09:28 · Score: 1
  
  It's because in central and southern Spain it can often be like 40C around noon. So back when people worked outdoors in farming and the like it made sense to have an extended break and only resume work when it became cooler again. Now that people do office work in air conditioned buildings it doesn't make sense anymore.
26. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 09:53 · Score: 0
  
  Why don't you just look it up instead of looking like a total fucking tool?
  Somehow I trust this source over the talkings of a moron who obviously has shit logs rolling around his mouth.
27. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by sunking2 · 2017-07-20 10:16 · Score: 1
  
  What the summary at least fails to mention is that Spain is in the wrong time zone. After the Spanish Revolution they adopted the same timezone as Eastern Europe. They are an hour later than France, England, etc. This is important because the people decided they weren't going to change the time they eat, so they eat an hour later and added an hour of lunch break. And low and behold, on average they say Spanish get 53m less sleep a night. I'm currently in Cartagena doing some work at Navantia. The entire ship yard works 7-3 with virtually no lunch break at all. Which is just especially all sorts of awesome when you get back to the hotel, shower, go out to get something to eat and any non tapa restaurante is closed for siesta until about 8pm.
28. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by sunking2 · 2017-07-20 10:19 · Score: 1
  
  meant civil war, not revolution.
29. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Solandri · 2017-07-20 10:32 · Score: 1
  
  Unlike money, productivity is conserved. The amount of stuff/services society consumes has to equal the amount it produces. (Actually the amount produced slightly exceeds the amount consumed due to inefficiencies. e.g. losses during transport due to accidents. But the amount consumed cannot exceed the amount produced.)
  
  While creative tasks can experience increased productivity from shorter hours and longer breaks, they are the exception. The productivity of production and service jobs scales linearly with hours worked. If those workers work fewer hours, less stuff is produced, meaning less stuff can be consumed, meaning the society's standard of living decreases. The only way to increase productivity while decreasing hours with these tasks (thus increasing the standard of living) is through technological assistance and automation.
30. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by angel'o'sphere · 2017-07-20 10:32 · Score: 1
  
  Actually over land busses in Greece, e.g. make a 2 - 3 hours break and stop at a restaurant so the travelers can have their food and siesta and the driver, too.
  The idiots posting this article seem not to get: the siesta is for every one, except the poor sods working in a shopping mall, serving idiot tourists, who don't get it.
  So in other words: during 12:00 - 15:00 only restaurant stuff, Air traffic controllers, hospital stuff and similar people are working.
  
  --
  Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
31. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 11:07 · Score: 1
  
  A link to bing? & who is the fool?
32. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by thegarbz · 2017-07-20 11:13 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  Spain is roughly on the same latitude as the northern half of the US. Spain can get hot no doubt, but to think that the US doesn't or is cooler is pretty naiive or foolish.
  As is comparing places by latitude. Climates are a complicated thing. If you want to truly appreciate it then you should check out Gran Canaria (technically Spanish but off the coast of Africa). The island is 40km wide and round. Depending where you are on the island it will either be 20deg and permanently cloudy or 37deg and never see a drop of rain.
  Likewise the UK is more northern than Illinois, but it sure as hell doesn't have an average low temperature of -10C during the winter.
  You're right of course, but for the wrong reasons.
33. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by lindseyp · 2017-07-20 13:49 · Score: 1
  
  Northern spain is about the same latitude as Hokkaido, Japan. Northern spain rarely sees snow, Hokkaido routinely sees -30 degree C weather and ice floes on the ocean. Comparing by latitude isn't really valid.
  The whole of Europe is warmer than the latitude suggests, if you compare to other parts of the world, thanks to the jet stream. I guess in a similar way to N. California vs East Coast USA. Spain is famously sunny and hot during the afternoons in summer. They also have their clocks set relatively late, so the sun is out till 9pm and it's still twilight well past 10pm.
  
  --
  j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
34. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 14:01 · Score: 0
  
  Yeah, no. You're about a century late on this, one of the most famous capitalist pioneered shorter hours so his factory workers could be more productive. And he wasn't doing this for charity.
  What could be true is that, while the ideal work-week was deemed to be 40 hours for an average factory worker, for creative workers it should be 30 hours or less.
35. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by mattack2 · 2017-07-20 14:12 · Score: 1
  
  not having to roll out of bed super early,
  But, but, but... the summary says:
  
  After starting work between 8 and 9 a.m.
  which is "super early" to me. (I *get up* at 9am most days, and that's partially due to the insane parking at work. Though that's only about a half hour earlier than I used to get up, to force me to be an early-ish person.)
36. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by demonlapin · 2017-07-20 14:21 · Score: 1
  
  If you're referencing Ford, he used lower hours and higher pay to skim the best workers and keep them. He wasn't afraid to fire people. Effective for one small-ish firm, but doesn't scale all that well (even at the height of the UAW, there were a lot of non-union guys getting pittances in supplier shops). Paying them more and working them less isn't a panacea. If you can reliably get the top 10% most productive workers by doing so, you'll probably come out ahead. If not, well...
37. Re: Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 14:42 · Score: 0
  
  I lived in Catalunya for 7+ years and I really enjoyed the lifestyle. I didn't hear many people complain about it (and the Catalans do like to complain), and international companies usually allowed workers to decide between a Spanish or European schedule. BTW, the long lunch break allows families to go home and have lunch together. As a result, the Spanish tend to have healthier, often home cooked lunches. Don't knock it until you've tried it!
38. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Ecuador · 2017-07-20 14:55 · Score: 1
  
  If you go by latitude, Barcelona is at a northerner latitude than NYC. And yet, NYC has lows as cold as -15F (I've been in a couple such winters myself there), while Barcelona has only had 1 day in the last 30 years with a "freezing" temperature (30F).
  Comparing climate by latitude is like comparing engines by their displacement (car analogy FTW!).
  
  --
  Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
39. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 16:21 · Score: 0
  
  This is the a taul problem here. Spain really needs to shift time zones
40. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 16:54 · Score: 0
  
  "Productivity is conserved" has nothing to do with how productive someone is, but you're assuming this (erroneously) in the rest of your comment. Not to mention "productivity is conserved" isn't true anyways because I can consume things that aren't produced by a human.
41. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 17:30 · Score: 0
  
  Yes, the 'baking' 6pm sun...LOL
  In the non flat earth land you seem to inhabit, it's hottest between 3-4 pm. Thats why school finishes those times, so we make make the kids walk home in the heat. Builds character.
42. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Gussington · 2017-07-20 17:57 · Score: 1
  
  Ehm, no it's not. You mustn't have been to Spain but I can tell you the hottest time of day is definitely around 2-5pm and in summer you shouldn't be doing any strenuous exercise outside in the sun until let's say 8pm, .
  I'm from Australia and seem to manage it ok. Why are the Spaniards so soft?
43. Re: Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by loufoque · 2017-07-20 19:31 · Score: 1
  
  School finishes at 5 or 6pm in that part of the world.
44. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 20:54 · Score: 0
  
  They might be in wrong timezone, but it's the same timezone most of western Europe are (except UK and Portugal). Including France and Germany.
  Eastern Europe has +1 hour added to Spanish time.
  source: Eastern European currently living in Spain.
45. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Citizen+of+Earth · 2017-07-20 21:13 · Score: 1
  
  Why not 0 hours? I bet productivity will approach Infinity!
46. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by redmid17 · 2017-07-20 22:20 · Score: 1
  
  I'm sitting in Chicago as we speak. Our high was 30+ C and was stickier than a middle school football practice.
  
  I lived in Germany in '03. I remember the French surgeon general (?) being recalled from vacation because of old people dying. Y'all just lack A/C. Miles ahead in proper building which cools though
47. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 22:51 · Score: 0
  
  Avoiding strenuous work during the peak hot hours in the summer, would seem to be the obvious reason. Although we're talking Spain here, it's hot but not deadly hot unlike some other countries. Why not have two timetables, one for most of the year, and the other for heatwaves?
  But as work migrates to offices and so on, I presume it is required less.
48. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by thegarbz · 2017-07-20 23:47 · Score: 1
  
  Having moved from Australia to northern Europe I don't think y'all lack AC is the reason. Rather it's general adjustment to climate. People don't know what to do in extraordinary situations.
  There's a day above 32deg here, they close the schools and the country piles onto the beach.
  There's a day above 32deg in Australia people cancel outdoor activities and go inside to avoid the sun.
  I can't even find SPF30+ sunscreen here.
  In Australia Slip-Slop-Slap is something that is drummed into our heads. My European colleagues don't understand why they see pictures of me in summer in Australia wearing a long sleeved shirt while on the beach. I point out the most sunburnt people in Australia are European tourists :-)
  Humans adjust, but not instantly. I'm actually beginning to realise people have a very poor survival instinct.
49. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-21 00:22 · Score: 0
  
  How was that Kool-Ade? What flavor did you get? Was it orange?
  I love it when people talk about an eight hour work day with an hour break in the middle as if it really IS just eight hours and not a nine hour work day where you only get paid for eight hours. Every single lunch break I have ever had in the last twenty years has been interrupted by some ding-bat co-worker saying "I know you're at lunch but could you just take a look...."
  I documented the stupidity. I showed it to my boss. I stopped taking lunches. I just eat at my desk and work through the "break" and now when my eight hours are up, I go home.
50. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by david_thornley · 2017-07-21 05:31 · Score: 1
  
  This has nothing to do with the hours worked, but with the scheduling. If everyone worked 8-5 with noon-1 off for lunch, there'd be the exact same problem of no time to shop.
  
  --
  "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
51. Re: Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-21 07:28 · Score: 0
  
  Ha ha :-D Good one!
52. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by HornWumpus · 2017-07-21 07:31 · Score: 1
  
  Go outside at 6pm today you fuckwit. Notice where 'yellow eye' is in the sky.
  It's already hot as fuck by 1, but it keeps creeping up until the sun is about ready to set.
  
  --
  John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
53. Re: Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-22 07:39 · Score: 0
  
  Also note that spain is on European time while its actually closer to GMT in location. That alone makes for an hour of difference.
54. Re:Is there any actual benefit to that schedule? by AutodidactLabrat · 2017-07-27 09:09 · Score: 1
  
  Is it fair to assume you now don't bother to go to that place any longer, given they no longer pay you?
Spain is falling apart by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 06:47 · Score: 1

This might be innocent fun for the business types, but Spain is coming apart at the seams.
The Siesta only works if... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 06:49 · Score: 3, Insightful

The Siesta only works if you work close enough that you can go home during it. If you have to commute long distances to get to work, so that you can't realistically go home during the workday, there's literally zero reason why any rational person should want to take a 3-hour lunch, especially when 2 of those 3 hours could be spent at home with family at the end of the day.
1. Re:The Siesta only works if... by XXongo · 2017-07-20 06:52 · Score: 0
  
  The Siesta only works if you work close enough that you can go home during it. If you have to commute long distances to get to work, so that you can't realistically go home during the workday, there's literally zero reason why any rational person should want to take a 3-hour lunch, especially when 2 of those 3 hours could be spent at home with family at the end of the day.
  Yes, but Spain doesn't go with this American idea that a middle-class livestyle requires that you live in a house an hour's commute away from work so you can live as far away as possible from the poor people.
2. Re:The Siesta only works if... by HornWumpus · 2017-07-20 07:00 · Score: 1
  
  Take the siesta clocked in, sitting at your desk. Duh. It's like showing up, even though insanely hungover. Why would you use a sick day to be useless? Be useless on the clock, you know you have coworkers that are useless on the clock EVERY DAY.
  The trick is learning to sleep sitting up. Was my senior project in high school.
  
  --
  John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
3. Re:The Siesta only works if... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:05 · Score: 0, Flamebait
  
  America seems to have a particularly bad class divide resulting from targeted marketing that drives enormous wedges between every conceivable demographic.
4. Re:The Siesta only works if... by cayenne8 · 2017-07-20 07:11 · Score: 1
  
  there's literally zero reason why any rational person should want to take a 3-hour lunch, especially when 2 of those 3 hours could be spent at home with family at the end of the day.
  Hmm...makes perfect sense if you'd rather be doing something other than even MORE time at home trapped with the wife and rug rats.
  Maybe there's a reason for stretching things out...haha.
  
  --
  Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
5. Re:The Siesta only works if... by JackieBrown · 2017-07-20 07:19 · Score: 1
  
  Yes, but Spain doesn't go with this American idea that a middle-class livestyle requires that you live in a house an hour's commute away from work so you can live as far away as possible from the poor people.
  Maybe we would if we were the size of Spain.
6. Re:The Siesta only works if... by Major_Disorder · 2017-07-20 07:55 · Score: 2
  
  Once you learn to sleep sitting up with your eyes open, meetings become so much more productive.
  
  --
  First law of people: People are generally stupid.
7. Re:The Siesta only works if... by butchersong · 2017-07-20 08:38 · Score: 1
  
  It isn't all poor people we are avoiding... only certain demographics and that is more out of self preservation or at least concern for our children's safety.
8. Re:The Siesta only works if... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 09:09 · Score: 0
  
  Congratulations, you have won first place in this year's American Clueless About City Geography award!
9. Re:The Siesta only works if... by angel'o'sphere · 2017-07-20 10:38 · Score: 1
  
  In the rest of the world, people usually don't commute for hours to work :)
  YMMV.
  
  --
  Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
10. Re:The Siesta only works if... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 10:55 · Score: 0
  
  Children get raped and abducted by family members mainly.
11. Re:The Siesta only works if... by HornWumpus · 2017-07-20 11:27 · Score: 1
  
  One of the funniest things I ever saw was a great big dude lean over and start snoring 'at 11' while a VP was pontificating at 500 people. He wasn't clowning, he fell asleep...nobody wanted to wake him up though, it was too funny. VP just got madder and madder. Ended up with him yelling at us to wake the dude up, we still didn't really want to, but at that point he'd called us out, so we woke him up...slowly. That place sucked.
  
  --
  John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
12. Re:The Siesta only works if... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-21 01:43 · Score: 0
  
  It's sad that parent was modded down, it's quite a reasonable, unpartisan statement.
Misread summary... by __aaclcg7560 · 2017-07-20 06:57 · Score: 2

For a moment I thought said, "California and Spain," and I thought, "When did Cali-Mexico go back to Spain?!"
1. Re:Misread summary... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:25 · Score: 0
  
  Imagine how many cheeseburgers you could absorb during a three hour lunch? Do you even chew your food anymore? Or does your mouth secrete hydrochloric acid directly so you can eat like a pelican?
2. Re:Misread summary... by __aaclcg7560 · 2017-07-20 07:51 · Score: 0
  
  Imagine how many cheeseburgers you could absorb during a three hour lunch?
  I haven't had Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger with ground turkey in years.
3. Re:Misread summary... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 08:31 · Score: 0
  
  OK, and? What does that non sequitur even mean? Which one of your three bent neurons caused your ham-like fists to pound out that senseless post?
4. Re:Misread summary... by __aaclcg7560 · 2017-07-20 08:54 · Score: 0
  
  Which one of your three bent neurons caused your ham-like fists to pound out that senseless post?
  I responded to a senseless post. Have some Portuguese Spam.
5. Re:Misread summary... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 10:29 · Score: 0
  
  No, sorry, you responded WITH a senseless post. About your sig, how about losing ten pounds by not stealing children's cheeseburgers, you fat fraud?
6. Re:Misread summary... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 10:34 · Score: 0
  
  you sound bitter, bro
7. Re:Misread summary... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 11:21 · Score: 0
  
  You sound autistic.
8. Re:Misread summary... by ChunderDownunder · 2017-07-20 11:33 · Score: 1
  
  Well it's actually about Catalunya NOT Spain, as the separatists will tell you. They have an (unconstitutional) referendum for leaving occurring in about 6 weeks.
9. Re:Misread summary... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 12:03 · Score: 0
  
  Why not both?
10. Re:Misread summary... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 12:47 · Score: 0
  
  Only if I can have these after!
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
11. Re:Misread summary... by __aaclcg7560 · 2017-07-20 12:54 · Score: 1
  
  About your sig, how about losing ten pounds by not stealing children's cheeseburgers, you fat fraud?
  Another senseless post. Have some Chorizo Spam.
12. Re:Misread summary... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 13:15 · Score: 0
  
  With creimer, it's Why not broth?
13. Re:Misread summary... by unixisc · 2017-07-20 13:27 · Score: 1
  
  Do people actually need the 3 hrs to eat, or to get other work done, like post office, bank, et al? My typical lunch break is half an hour, but on occasions that I need to do home chores, such as going to the post office or bank or so on, I occasionally take 2 hrs.
Restaurant hours by dtmos · 2017-07-20 06:58 · Score: 4, Informative

One thing that always bewilders US tourists visiting large cities in Spain is that the posted hours at the typical restaurant has it closing at 5 PM, then reopening at 8 PM.
Conversely, one can always tell if a restaurant caters to tourists: If it's open at 6 PM, it's not catering to the locals!
1. Re:Restaurant hours by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:03 · Score: 0
  
  Restaurants don't 'cater' to anyone in particular. They cater to whomever will give them money.
2. Re:Restaurant hours by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:05 · Score: 1
  
  I remember going to dinner one night in Barcelona. We arrived around 10pm and were afraid they might be closing, as the place was nearly empty. By the end of our meal around 11, the place was packed with a line out the door!
3. Re:Restaurant hours by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:38 · Score: 0
  
  You win the most stupid comment of the day award.
  Who are those people with money, and what do they want? You can't make EVERYONE happy (otherwise, you would only have one restaurant in town) - thus you try to make some of them happy enough to give you money.
4. Re:Restaurant hours by green1 · 2017-07-20 08:05 · Score: 1
  
  Not just Spain, the same was true in Greece. It was actually kind of funny for us as tourists. When we arrived in Athens at 7pm nothing was open, we were worried we wouldn't be able to find anything to eat. Turned out that by 9pm the restaurants were just starting to open again.
  Then we went in to a more touristy area, and everywhere we went the restaurants had someone on the sidewalk very aggressively trying to get our business. The only sure-fire way we found to turn them down without them chasing us down the street was to say that it was too early to eat, they always understood that, even if it was 10pm. (Any other excuse resulted in them still trying, but nobody ever continued to pursue us if we said it was too early)
5. Re:Restaurant hours by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 08:06 · Score: 0
  
  Soo... Just like Universal Parks Florida?
6. Re: Restaurant hours by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 11:05 · Score: 0
  
  You couldn't be more correct. You could also add "any restaurants that have pictures of their dishes displayed outside"
7. Re:Restaurant hours by thegarbz · 2017-07-20 11:07 · Score: 1
  
  Conversely, one can always tell if a restaurant caters to tourists: If it's open at 6 PM, it's not catering to the locals!
  I was at a restaurant last week in Castellon de la Plana and went to get dinner at 9:20pm. I was told politely we are welcome to sit and have drinks but the kitchen doesn't open till 10pm.
I think it's because of historical reasons by jgfenix · 2017-07-20 06:58 · Score: 1

I can't say for sure because I haven't delved into it but I think it's related to the siesta and climate in most of Spain. Try to practice agriculture (or other jobs like construction) at noon in Andalusia during the summer and you'll experience hell.
1. Re:I think it's because of historical reasons by Gryle · 2017-07-20 09:30 · Score: 1
  
  While it is based on climate, the practice actually originated with the ancient Romans and followed their conquest and colonization of various territories. The Italians maintain the practice under the name "riposo". In my experience, it's normally the smaller or independent businesses that maintain the practice. For example, my local butcher, grocer, and mechanic all maintain the practice, as do the smaller downtown "boutique" stores, but the chain shops in the mall and chain supermarkets don't. On the other hand, a lot of the chain stores don't open until 1000. On another interesting note, in some provinces maintaining the riposo practice entitles you to tax breaks, which I expect it what drives a lot of the smaller shops to maintain the practice.
  
  The Greeks, Portugese, and some areas in southern France have a similar tradition, but I haven't traveled as extensively in those areas and can't comment beyond that.
  
  --
  Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
Is our always-on workstyle much different? by ErichTheRed · 2017-07-20 07:02 · Score: 4, Interesting

This 3-hour break was certainly a good idea pre-air conditioning. I've been to a few Middle Eastern countries that have similar practices - either they start work late, work late then eat dinner at 9 or 10:00 at night, or they'll have a similar long break during the middle of the day.
Whatever the work arrangements, I'm guessing people who have flexible schedules have a similar issue - they're not able to stop work during the evening and not able to properly wind down. I'm very lucky that I'm not chained to the desk for fixed hours; these days I'm in systems engineering and out of the IT operations craziness except when something needs serious fixing. This is great because I'm a dad - my wife and I share the various kid appointments and appearances, but I have the more flexible job so I try to help out. This isn't so great when I miss 2 or 3 hours in the middle of the day, then have to come home and do the dad thing, and _then_ have to finish up after everyone's asleep. (It's not because someone's cracking the whip over me, but because the work piles up otherwise; much of my job involves reading, writing and trying new things out lately and I have a massive backlog of reading that never gets shorter.)
I think the key to getting a flexible work schedule right is to not let it turn into an always-on situation, while simultaneously not being a clock-watcher. Like anything, balance is always good. I know people who work for companies with totally out-of-whack work life balance, and they can't go 10 seconds without checking their phone, email and messaging apps because someone is always trying to get a hold of them. Yes, someone always has to be on-call when you're in operations, but it can't be everybody 24 hours a day. That's a way to burn people out quick. People need contiguous, long blocks of sleep to be healthy. If Spanish people aren't able to do that because they have a 3-hour hole in the middle of their day, I can't see any reason not to change.
1. Re:Is our always-on workstyle much different? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 10:04 · Score: 0
  
  You're talking out of your ass, turning anecdotal preference and what you're used to and comfortable with, into "wisdom" for everyone, everywhere. Who gives a fuck about your kid or current schedule.
2. Re:Is our always-on workstyle much different? by n329619 · 2017-07-20 16:08 · Score: 3, Interesting
  
  Not to disagree with your main focus on flexible work schedule and how companies shouldn't be clock-watcher, but stating that the 3-hours hole could cause sleep cycle issue might actually in the opposite.
  Providing the 3-hours lunch and nap benefit Spain workers sleep cycle as humans were not meant to have long blocks of sleep. Have you ever felt in an afternoon that it feels great to take a nap? That's the body responding to the natural pattern.
  Humans were meant to have multiple shorter cycle sleeps in the day and night (Biphasic sleep / Interrupted sleep - two periods of nighttime sleep and a nap in the day). It was until industrialization that resulted in wanting people that can work long hour none stop and thus one long hour sleep. We industrialized people sleep one long night, therefore we feel working at 10pm is stressful as we get progressively sleepy and tried. However, their nap made them more energetic thus working at 10pm is not as stressful. Their nap also increases the awake time of the workers therefore actually provide a little more time for work balance.
  So it may still be beneficial to Spain workers. However as it is incompatible with other industrialized world, like what you've said, only the working people of Spain can see if it is working and decide on whether or not they want to abandon their practice.
Adjustment needed by johnw · 2017-07-20 07:04 · Score: 5, Informative

Bear in mind that, because Spain uses central European time, their clocks are between 1 and 3 hours ahead of what you'd get if you used a sundial. Most of Spain is west of the Greenwich meridian, and yet they use a clock time based on them being 15 degrees east of it.
Thus, when they start dinner at 10 p.m., it's merely 10 p.m. by their oddly set clocks. They're really starting somewhere between 7 and 9 p.m.
1. Re:Adjustment needed by lurker412 · 2017-07-20 07:19 · Score: 1
  
  Thus, when they start dinner at 10 p.m., it's merely 10 p.m. by their oddly set clocks. They're really starting somewhere between 7 and 9 p.m.
  What a peculiar idea. Clock time is entirely arbitrary, as are customary meal times. Spain's odd timezone was a political decision made during the Franco years, but the siesta/business hours custom is much older. The siesta is entirely inappropriate for almost everyone in modern, urban Spain, and will almost certainly disappear within a generation. It has nothing whatsoever to do with Catalan independence/separatism.
2. Re:Adjustment needed by johnw · 2017-07-20 07:25 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  What a peculiar idea. Clock time is entirely arbitrary,
  It's not clear what you think is a peculiar idea, but to say that clock time is entirely arbitrary is a ludicrous assertion. Clock time is always loosely based on the position of the sun. Spain is unusual in moving quite so far away from where their clocks would have been before the advent of railways required unified times.
  All I was pointing out is that the Spanish don't in fact eat as late in the evening as they appear to.
  The rest of your post doesn't seem to relate in any way to what I said.
3. Re:Adjustment needed by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:32 · Score: 0
  
  The siesta is entirely inappropriate for almost everyone in modern, urban Spain
  As an American, fuck that noise, a three hour nap is appropriate for everyone.
4. Re:Adjustment needed by lurker412 · 2017-07-20 07:48 · Score: 5, Interesting
  
  Spain moved to Central European time to facilitate coordination with Germany during WWII. I believe it was in 1940. It is an hour later than what it was previously. When I say that clock time is arbitrary, I mean just that. There is nothing natural about sunrise being at 6:00, 7:00 or 8:00--it's just what we have agreed on. We could just have easily agreed that sunrise would be at 15:00, and if we had, that would seem "natural."
  
  You are correct that the rest of the post had nothing to do with yours, but rather was connected with the original post. I live in Spain (and since I'm retired, I do take siestas), and I find it annoying that two separate issues--Spain's geographically inappropriate timezone, and Spain's inconvenient commercial hours--tend to be conflated. It's the siesta schedule that truly affects people, not the odd timezone.
5. Re:Adjustment needed by johnw · 2017-07-20 07:55 · Score: 1
  
  Spain moved to Central European time to facilitate coordination with Germany during WWII. I believe it was in 1940. It is an hour later than what it was previously. When I say that clock time is arbitrary, I mean just that. There is nothing natural about sunrise being at 6:00, 7:00 or 8:00--it's just what we have agreed on. We could just have easily agreed that sunrise would be at 15:00, and if we had, that would seem "natural."
  
  Well, yes - it's arbitrary in the sense that any old time-keeping system could have been adopted. We could have made hours 83 minutes long, and each minute could be the time it takes a feather to fall 8 feet, but we didn't.
  Instead we went for a system of 24 hours in the day, with 12 noon being the time when the sun is highest in the sky. Spain is unusual in that it diverges a particularly long way from that convention.
  It seems therefore that whilst you're right to say that the human race's timekeeping system is arbitrary (as are all our systems of measure), none of your post was relevant to what I said.
6. Re:Adjustment needed by green1 · 2017-07-20 08:09 · Score: 1
  
  All I was pointing out is that the Spanish don't in fact eat as late in the evening as they appear to.
  Maybe not compared to a neighbouring country, but in comparison to the time they got up in the morning they sure do, and that's really the only important metric.
  The time on the clock *is* relevant if it's consistent from one end of the day to the other.
7. Re:Adjustment needed by Huge_UID · 2017-07-20 08:42 · Score: 1
  
  And they are starting work somewhere between 5 and 7 a.m.
8. Re:Adjustment needed by angel'o'sphere · 2017-07-20 10:45 · Score: 1
  
  The siesta is entirely inappropriate for almost everyone in modern, urban Spain
  Sorry, that isutter nonsense.
  Siesta is a climate and cuktural habit thing.
  It will never go away.
  Inappropriated for what? Skype calls to USA?
  Rofl ...
  
  --
  Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
9. Re:Adjustment needed by thegarbz · 2017-07-20 11:05 · Score: 1
  
  Thus, when they start dinner at 10 p.m., it's merely 10 p.m. by their oddly set clocks. They're really starting somewhere between 7 and 9 p.m.
  This. I just got back from Spain and at around 9:30 we were walking to dinner in time for sunset. This may not seem strange to those of you in northern latitudes, but Spain is far from northern.
10. Re:Adjustment needed by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-21 11:36 · Score: 0
  
  Clock time is only based on the sun because humans made it that way.
  Because humans invented the idea of tracking time with numbers there's nothing to say we have to base it on where the sun currently is in the sky right now. There are many in the world who believe we should simply have no time zones and use UTC for all necessary time. So the numbers on the clock say 22:00 when you wake up and 14:00 when you go to bed. Who cares?
Sounds Fine ... by gordguide · 2017-07-20 07:11 · Score: 0

To be honest, the current workday sounds perfectly reasonable to me, and isn't much different from my typical workday if I'm working on my own project or working the jobs I normally accept, except for the 3-hour break part, which is about 2 ½ hours longer than I usually manage.
So an improvement, actually, over what I'm used to. I don't mind a 12-hour workday or a 7-day workweek. Working 100 12-hour days in a row is not a problem for me. On the other hand, most of the people I know would probably attempt to incite an insurrection if they had to work those hours.
Why do I do it? Because I can work more hours than most people do in a year, and am still able to take about three 1-month vacations in that same year. In other words there's a time for work and there's a time for play.
1. Re:Sounds Fine ... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:41 · Score: 0
  
  So an improvement, actually, over what I'm used to. I don't mind a 12-hour workday or a 7-day workweek. Working 100 12-hour days in a row is not a problem for me. On the other hand, most of the people I know would probably attempt to incite an insurrection if they had to work those hours.
  Why do I do it? Because I can work more hours than most people do in a year, and am still able to take about three 1-month vacations in that same year. In other words there's a time for work and there's a time for play.
  You can keep that, I and most others will take more frequent vacations instead even if they're shorter. Even the regular 2-day weekend is barely enough time to recharge after a 40 hour workweek, especially if much of it really gets taken up by errands that couldn't be run on weeknights.
Better than Japan by ichthus · 2017-07-20 07:21 · Score: 1

Getting off work at 8 is messed up, but it's still better than the Japanese way. They start at around 8am, break for a ~half hour lunch, and then continue working until 9, 9:30 or even 10PM. At a time most normal shift, full-time workers in the US would be watching a Seinfeld rerun before turning in, they're just sitting down to dinner. Yeah, that's messed up.
(I've been told that Tokyo is starting to turn its back on this old way in favor of more work/life balance, though.)

--
sig: sauer
1. Re:Better than Japan by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 15:22 · Score: 0
  
  Plenty of people do that in America, take a second job. Working 1 job for 14 hours instead of 2 jobs would save time and hassle.
  I take the minimum time possible, 25 minutes so I maximize my time I have at home.
Greece, too by pz · 2017-07-20 07:23 · Score: 1

What remained is a highly distinctive national timetable not found in any other European country
Greece has an equivalent schedule (or did it get kicked out of Europe already?). Actually, it has an even more maddening schedule where SOME days stores and offices have long lunches and re-open late, and SOME days they don't. Fortunately, it's a weekly schedule that doesn't vary from one week to the next, except for holidays when everything closes. Almost everything is closed on Sundays, too.
Having lived in Athens as an ex-pat more than once, I can tell you it's really quite nice to have a midday nap after the largest meal of the day when it's hot out. And it's fantastic to have dinner late. Many times I've made rendez-vous with friends to start dinner at midnight. Yes, you have to have a snack earlier (typically when you wake up from siesta at about 5 PM and take a coffee and something), but it feels just far more civilized than the American tradition of the largest meal at 6 PM. It feels healthier.
And with almost everything closed on Sundays, it means you have to get your errands and such all taken care of on Saturdays, leaving Sunday for rest, indeed. And not rest meaning, "I'll take care of that one bit of work or that one errand on Sunday," but real rest. It is remarkably refreshing.

--

Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
Really? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:26 · Score: 0

Some clarifications from Spain:
* This is about Catalonia, that is just a part of Spain.
* This is a proposal, not a law.
* Lunch breaks are one hour in most companies, two hours is uncommon, three is unheard.
If you want to be competitive with US and India by OrangeTide · 2017-07-20 07:30 · Score: 1, Insightful

You can't compete in the modern global market if you don't adopt the lowest possible standards. So you'll need to switch over to 55 hour work weeks, 2 or less weeks per year vacation, and no government healthcare. (US uses private insurance, for India it is typically paid out of pocket)

--
“Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
1. Re:If you want to be competitive with US and India by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 08:12 · Score: 0
  
  Oh, shut up.
2. Re:If you want to be competitive with US and India by JackieBrown · 2017-07-20 09:34 · Score: 1
  
  Why does Spain need to compete in the global market?
  Also, it's funny how you criticize that other countries have to adapt to the US while taking a story about Spain to talk about the US.
3. Re:If you want to be competitive with US and India by OrangeTide · 2017-07-20 12:24 · Score: 1
  
  Also, it's funny how you criticize that other countries have to adapt to the US while taking a story about Spain to talk about the US.
  Am I criticizing other countries, or my own? (US)
  
  --
  “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
4. Re:If you want to be competitive with US and India by JackieBrown · 2017-07-21 02:04 · Score: 1
  
  In a story not related to the US. Your imperialism is showing
5. Re:If you want to be competitive with US and India by OrangeTide · 2017-07-21 05:34 · Score: 1
  
  Spain doesn't operate in a bubble. They interact with the rest of the world. I cited two examples of countries that are different than Spain in order to contrast differences in culture, work ethic and business.
  Maybe my comments would be irrelevant if Spain were isolationist or only traded with France and Italy.
  
  --
  “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
6. Re:If you want to be competitive with US and India by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-24 12:16 · Score: 0
  
  Why does Spain need to compete in the global market?
  Spain already competes. They'd have to restructure their entire economy to turn back the clock 50 years. (well 49 years)
France by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 07:34 · Score: 0

Colleagues calendars are blocked every day 12:00-13:30. Just half of Spain, but still.
Hot Southern and Western States by Zorro · 2017-07-20 07:44 · Score: 1

Have something similar.
Get up WAY before sunrise and work till it is too hot, around noon or so.
Then nothing much happens till sundown.
Desert animals had this figured out WAY before humans came along.
1. Re:Hot Southern and Western States by cheesybagel · 2017-07-20 09:43 · Score: 1
  
  Desert animals don't have artificial light.
Has the author ever BEEN there? by petes_PoV · 2017-07-20 07:45 · Score: 3, Informative

The article reads like a long list of cliches, harvested from clippings.
So far as I know, the "nap-bars" mentioned were only in the news recently because one has just opened.
My personal experience is that spanish businesses and most shops open at 10 (local time) until 2. Everybody has lunch at 2 - which depending on whether daylight savings is in effect of not is roughly the local noon, or one hour past.
Small shops reopen at 4-ish, if they reopen at all. Supermarkets are open for the whole day.
Businesses can be open until 9 at night. Although that is still generally before the spanish eat their late meal (the main meal is lunch). And the day ends at about midnight local time - except at weekends and fiestas: of which there are many.
As for being unique? I seem to recall Italy working to the same schedule when I worked there briefly in the 90's.

--
politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
1. Re: Has the author ever BEEN there? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 08:02 · Score: 1
  
  Italians and Spaniards will have to adopt Germany's work schedule, it's that simple.
Crap article by Hognoxious · 2017-07-20 07:55 · Score: 1

the average Spaniard's habit of keeping extremely late hours and taking delightfully long lunch breaks was making everyday life harder for citizens.

If it's making life that hard why are they still doing it?

--
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Good by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 08:00 · Score: 0

Work, you shit spaniards.
I call B.S. by rsilvergun · 2017-07-20 08:03 · Score: 2, Insightful

they'll lose their 3 hour lunch break and still have to work late.

--
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
1. Re:I call B.S. by cheesybagel · 2017-07-20 09:44 · Score: 1
  
  Bingo.
2. Re:I call B.S. by thegarbz · 2017-07-20 11:03 · Score: 0
  
  This isn't America. Most European workers aren't pushovers who will take whatever rules they are given.
3. Re:I call B.S. by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 17:30 · Score: 0
  
  In case we (I am spanish) worked from 8 to 16h, we would look for a second job in the evening...
4. Re:I call B.S. by mjwx · 2017-07-20 23:53 · Score: 2
  
  This,
  
  Nobody expects the Spanish Indigestion.
  
  --
  Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
Rio de Janeiro Time by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 08:03 · Score: 0

Many office jobs in Rio practice a similar thing, but instead of having a big break in the afternoon, they don't show up to the office until 10-10:30 AM. They have 1 hour lunch break, but don't leave work until 7:30-8:30. Dinner is around 10 PM and you stay up 1 AM on a regular basis.
Though like Spanish Siesta, this is get less common than it used to be.
Excuse me, I'm Spanish and by fabriciom · 2017-07-20 08:06 · Score: 4, Informative

I'd like to clear somethings. The "3 hour" lunch is 4 hours and this depends where you live in Spain. In the big cities (Madrid, Barcelona, etc) all office jobs only have 1 hour lunch, only the public facing jobs have 4 hours lunch. I'm talking about retail stores and such.
Not true by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 08:16 · Score: 5, Insightful

I'm Spanish and the article talks about shop opening hours. Practically NOBODY has more than one hour for lunch. WTF are these guys talking about?
1. Re:Not true by thegarbz · 2017-07-20 11:02 · Score: 1
  
  Maybe in your part of Spain, but there are plenty of places where you most definitely do get a multi-hour lunch break + snooze. What I don't understand is the article talking about no one having a siester. That one is more foreign to me than the length of the lunchbreak.
3 hours seems a bit much by quintesse · 2017-07-20 08:20 · Score: 4, Interesting

I (foreigner living 10+ years in Madrid) don't know many people here that take 3 hour lunches. One, one and a half hours seems much more common. The times we have a lunch that takes more than 2 hours people normally start looking nervously at their watches.
And they definitely don't get to lunch as hungry as you might think, because normally at 11:30 or so people tend to have an "almuerzo", like a light brunch, which is _additional_ to the lunch you eat. So light breakfast, "almuerzo", lunch (which is the biggest meal of the day), then "merienda" for the kids in the late afternoon and (not a big) dinner at 10pm.
1. Re:3 hours seems a bit much by itamihn · 2017-07-23 21:30 · Score: 1
  
  You got it almost right. The almuerzo is a light meal, which is in the end closer to the lunch that many people outside Spain eat. It's kind of just renaming and shuffling meals. Spanish lunch is the dinner (main meal of the day), whereas Spanish supper is typically a snack, salad or something small a couple of hours before going to bed.
This post is bollock by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 08:35 · Score: 1

As a catalonian this post is utterly bollocks and full of misinformation. Work day starts at 09, lunch at 13-14h and leave jobs at 18h.
liquid lunches and late nights by andrewa · 2017-07-20 08:47 · Score: 1

I worked in Spain many times when I was still living in England. We would typically turn up around 9AM and work till around 3PM, then take 2-3 hours for lunch, and then go back to work till about 10-10:30PM and then leave to go and have dinner.
It was hard to adapt, especially if the previous week I had been working in Germany or something like that, where it's a 07:30-08:00 start, an hour for lunch, and then knock off no later than 6PM.
One nice lunch I vaguely remember in Spain:
3x beers
Some meat on a plate that you cooked yourself over a little stove
2x jugs of Sangria
Some doughnuts that you dip in a chocolate
3x shots of aguardiente (or some other liquor)
a token espresso

--
:(){ :|:& };:
1. Re:liquid lunches and late nights by aberglas · 2017-07-20 13:58 · Score: 2
  
  I've written code after a lunch like that that took weeks to fix afterwards...
Say via con queso to EspaÃ±a's tres ora by Provocateur · 2017-07-20 08:58 · Score: 1

Don't I just rock el lenguaje de conquistadores, now?
The French observe similar schedules. But if it works out to a healthier work-life balance, then why not? It's the americans that don't take vacations; they just get accumulated--for the eventual You can take this job speech.

--
WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
Killed almost 15K? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 09:07 · Score: 0

It's a good thing they didn't die!
1. Re:Killed almost 15K? by BarbaraHudson · 2017-07-21 07:53 · Score: 1
  
  It's a good thing they didn't die!
  Learn to read. I wrote "killed almost 15,000, not "almost killed 15,000."
  
  --
  "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
Is there any harm to it? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 09:27 · Score: 0

They spend a lot more time eating midday. And since you burn up those calories during the day, a larger meal (which will make you more sluggish after eating it until digestion is mostly over, taking a couple of hours to manage so) during the day is much healthier for your body's needs.
And not rushing digestion probably means the food is more completely digested and therefore the, um, "end product" a lot less nutritious for the ecology that live off shit to partake of (and making less of a mark on the exit areas). This too will make the sewer systems less unhygenic, being less food rich.
So I ask, is there any harm to it?
Bollocks ... by angel'o'sphere · 2017-07-20 10:23 · Score: 2

The article is bollcks as always.
You can take your break as lomg as you want, it is not mandatory or anything.
And if one had lived in Spain (or Italy or Greece) one would know: business is still going on during siesta, and it is damn mandatory to have a siesta if you work ... as it is DAMN HOT!

--
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
1. Re:Bollocks ... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 12:36 · Score: 0
  
  It's 40C on a typical Arizona summer day, and sometimes goes beyond that during a heat wave. None of them are taking 3h lunch breaks and siesta is really only applicable for construction crews who had to work a rare day shift. Sunrise is around 5:30 AM in the summer, which is when work starts for a day crew, they work until 2:00 PM (14:00) right about when the worst of the heat hits. That said, road construction frequently occurs at night when the roads aren't used as heavily.
What 3 hour break?? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 10:29 · Score: 0

I'm from Catalonia and I have no idea what is this "typical 3 hour break". In every job I know it's a 1 hour break, 2 hours tops. And, of course, all this "nap time culture" bullshit is just the usual national stereotyping. Yes, we also walk down the street in bullfighter costume, as is tradition... /s
Catalonia and the rest of Spain by thegarbz · 2017-07-20 11:00 · Score: 3, Insightful

it could drive a wedge between Catalonia and the rest of Spain
I think this may be kind of the point. Catalonia has done a lot to try and distance itself from the rest of Spain, by passing local laws in direct contradiction to the opinion of much of Spain, e.g. as states were passing laws to protect bullfighting, Catalonia passed laws to ban it. Plus there's the whole independence referendum thing and the several constitutional challenges that were fought on keeping Catalonia as part of Spain.
1. Re:Catalonia and the rest of Spain by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 17:35 · Score: 0
  
  So, they're kinda like Texas?
  You may now safely turn of your snark filter......
As interesting as it might be... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 11:12 · Score: 0

Why the fucking fuck this is fucking news on fucking slashdot?
erm not quite.... by klaatuveratanecto · 2017-07-20 11:51 · Score: 1

I've been living in Spain for the past 7 years and visited nearly every corner of this country. I get to work at 8 or 9. At 10:30 I have breakfast break (20 min). Then at 13:30 I take 1h lunch break. Leave for home at 17:00 or 18:00. Have supper around 20:30. Twice a week I take 2h lunch break as I go swimming and have quick meal after. I either eat at the restaurant or go home and have home cooked meal. Siesta - yes but only Saturdays and Sundays. I have some friends that sleep after their lunch break (siesta shouldn't be longer than 20 minutes). It makes the afternoon so much better. 3 hours of lunch break that's only in the very south of Spain (Anadalucia) where the temperature gets over 40ÂC and there is no living soul outside. Anywhere else this not applicable. El corte inglÃ©s (the biggest chain of shopping malls) goes from 9:30 till 22:00 non stop (Monday to Saturday). Same goes for Zara, Mango etc. Local businesses open 9:30 - 10:00 and close for lunch maximum 2h. Oh and as a curious thing in one of the companies I used to work we did Fridays till 8:00 -15:00. Then all July 8:00-15:00 and entire August holidays. Salary reparted into 14 payments. We had double payment in June (cash for holidays!!!) and November (Christmass!!).
Some (important) background on the topic by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 13:01 · Score: 0

The background of this is completely political. Catalonia politicians are pushing for independence from Spain; and if they achieve it, they will get outside of the European Union immediately. In this context, changing the schedule from the remainder of Spain serves two purposes: creating another artificial barrier with the rest of Spain, and showing the rest of Europe how European Catalonia is, and how convenient it would be to readmit Catalonia into the European Union.
It's true that Mariano Rajoy, Spain's President, proposed a few months ago a rationalization of Spain's schedules (even going as far as switching timezones from Central European to Greenwich). But the proposal wasn't well seen by most people, and it's now completely forgotten: this is the first time I have read about it in a long time.
By the way: the three hour lunch schedule ("split workday") is kept mostly by small business. In most cities, the three hour lunch break allows family to gather at home to lunch together - its main reason of being. Office workers usually do what we call "intensive workday", and work from 8:00 to 17:00 with a regular one-hour lunch. But many consider the intensive workday harmful for families.
separating... by unixisc · 2017-07-20 13:29 · Score: 1

Why not let any entity secede, be it UK from EU (Brexit), Scotland or Wales from UK, Catalonia from Spain, Flanders & Waloonia from Belgium, and so on? In the case of Catalonia, would they be leaving just Spain, or the EU as well?
1. Re:separating... by ChunderDownunder · 2017-07-20 13:50 · Score: 1
  
  Leaving the EU would be one for the politicians and lawyers. I think their hope is to stay in the EU and keep the Euro.
  But in the Catalan case, the current constitution bans any secession, as an indivisible entity under the Spanish crown - which was said to have been agreed to for the sake of harmony with one hand tied behind one's back for fear of a return of the Falangist era.
check the longitude by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 16:30 · Score: 0

Part of the reason for late dinners in Spain is that they are on central european time (UTC+1) while actually being west of Greenwich. So the sun rises and sets very late. Today, the sun rose at 7AM and set at 9:40PM in Madrid. Eating dinner at 10PM makes sense (my own experience is that if you go out to dinner at 10, you'll be eating with families with small kids. Grownups go out at midnight)
3 hours lunch? Quite untrue by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-20 21:18 · Score: 1

I am a Spaniard, and I live in Barcelona, Catalonia. Here there is nobody that is employed in an office, factory or many other types of jobs who has a 3-hours lunch, so that it is not true, it has never been "classic lunch" here. Long time ago it was quite common in office jobs to have 2 hours lunch, and then leave work between 7 and 8. During the last 10 years things have changed and it is more common just the one hour lunch, or even less in some cases like myself, and leave earlier, around 6pm normally. In factories the breaks are even shorter because they normally work in 8-hours shifts. Possibly the only ones who have this kind of long break are people who work in some kinds of shops, like clothing shops, some grocery shops and so on. They normally close from 2pm to 5pm, and then reopen until 8pm or 9pm.
I can also say that the famous "siesta" is an unknown for many spaniards, we don't do it during working hours. In old times when most of the population was rural and worked the land that was normal, the work was hard, the weather was hot many months since end of spring to half autumn, and at noon it was necessary to stop during the hottest hours to eat, rest, take a nap (yes, the siesta) and wait for cooler hours to continue working. But times have changed and now few people work in agriculture and most of the population is urbanite and have other kind of jobs.
Hellooo, Children,look at America by AutodidactLabrat · 2017-07-21 06:59 · Score: 1

You take a shorter lunch.
Suddenly there is an emergency, so you're still working until 2100.
Next thing, the "emergency" is just "wednesday" or "tuesday" or any day where you can work longer, for lower pay
Capitalists ONLY see you as an obstacle to more profit, why would they pass up the free work hours?
take your own advice by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-22 03:54 · Score: 0

The National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration claims that the amount of lag between 12:00 PM and the hottest time of day can be as much as three or four hours. The reason for this difference is the change in the earth's axis. The intensity of the heat experienced on Earth's surface at this time will vary based on location.
I guess a special snowflakes feelings are just much more important than scientific evidence. Who knew...
Pick a search engine, pick a city, stick in hourly temperature and the city, check some data, learn something.
Or probably not...Your feelings might get hurt.
Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · 2017-07-26 18:40 · Score: 0

I am from Spain, and this post is 99% bullshit.