Slashdot Mirror


China Is Perfecting a New Method For Suppressing Dissent On the Internet (vox.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Vox: The art of suppressing dissent has been perfected over the years by authoritarian governments. For most of human history, the solution was simple: force. Punish people severely enough when they step out of line and you deter potential protesters. But in the age of the internet and "fake news," there are easier ways to tame dissent. A new study by Gary King of Harvard University, Jennifer Pan of Stanford University, and Margaret Roberts of the University of California San Diego suggests that China is the leading innovator on this front. Their paper, titled "How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument," shows how Beijing, with the help of a massive army of government-backed internet commentators, floods the web in China with pro-regime propaganda. What's different about China's approach is the content of the propaganda. The government doesn't refute critics or defend policies; instead, it overwhelms the population with positive news (what the researchers call "cheerleading" content) in order to eclipse bad news and divert attention away from actual problems. This has allowed the Chinese government to manipulate citizens without appearing to do so. It permits just enough criticism to maintain the illusion of dissent and only acts overtly when fears of mass protest or collective action arise.

151 comments

  1. 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    George Orwell would have been proud.

    1. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youtube would have been proud.

    2. Re:1984 by endercase · · Score: 1

      Well that plus Shadow Banning of negative content. George Orwell really need to come out of hiding and come out with some new books. We know he isn't really dead. Just another GOVERMINT LIE. XD gg

  2. Hell by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 0

    Social Media in China must be hell on a slow news day

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  3. fr0sted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is the only thing stopping the US from becoming a fully-fledged dictatorship so this news is probably good overall.
    -creimer

    1. Re:fr0sted by GLMDesigns · · Score: 0

      What?

      Dictatorship - meaning government makes up it's own laws (sanctuary cities) and doesn't follow the laws on the books if they don't like them. (Obama saying he won't following existing immigration law.)

      Yeah. You're right we were on the way to a dictatorship.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    2. Re:fr0sted by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, moderate levels of compassion for immigrants, a hallmark of dictatorships...

      Why would you use such a stupid argument when there's so many better choices for examples? We've got the highest prison population in the world, extensive state surveillance, and the ability to throw away all rights if we shout the word terrorism loud and often enough.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:fr0sted by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Not a stupid argument. At least I don't think so.

      We have laws and they ought to be followed. The hallmark of dictatorships is not following the laws or making them up as they go along. So. We have immigration laws. Change them or follow them. We the people can petition it to be changed. Federal agencies need to follow these laws until changed.

      Re prison. Yes. Let's get rid of war on drugs and use imprisonment only for violent offenders.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    4. Re:fr0sted by unixisc · · Score: 1

      B'cos he's not a Leftist. Doesn't look at prison population as a function of a dictatorship, but rather, a function of the amount of crime. And who doesn't suddenly scream 'civil liberties' when people have sane reactions to Muslims being Muslims

    5. Re:fr0sted by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      The hallmark of dictatorships is concentration of unchecked power. Sanctuary cities are undermining the power of the federal government, which makes the US less like a dictatorship. Likewise, Obama not enforcing immigration laws is prudent discretion in enforcement, which is again, a less powerful government, and thus further away from a dictatorship. Some degree of discretion in enforcement is necessary, otherwise the system would collapse, and I'm far more concerned that he didn't jail bankers who crashed the global economy than not shipping out enough brown people.

      Now, you could have a dictatorship in regards to immigration law, but it would be the very opposite of what Obama did. If they were deporting without due process or a legal justification, that would indicate a dictatorship.

      That's why I'm so confused. Our government has tons of authoritarian tendencies, but lax enforcement of immigration is about the weakest argument I can think of.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    6. Re: fr0sted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is in your best interests to find new friends. Your current ones are filling you with misinformation.

    7. Re:fr0sted by rbrander · · Score: 2

      Please reconsider. To outsiders, that actually makes America look worse.

      If you were "just" a carceral state where non-violent crimes draw long sentences, that could be fixed with a change of leaders and a some legal reforms.

      But if you have the highest incarceration rate in the world *legitimately*, it means that Americans *as a people* are criminal, violent, lying, untrustworthy scum. If that much of the population needs to be in concrete boxes, your whole bell curve must be left-shifted. Everybody must be relatively more-criminal than those of other, more honest nations.

      Would you like to argue that's not true, that while America has a lot more bad apples that other countries, the rest of the barrel is somehow not spoiled? How about your top-level businessmen, the richest financiers? It looks a LOT to the rest of the world like they did great amounts of lying about asset values to enrich themselves while others lost; and it looks a LOT to everybody in America itself (the rest of us are watching kind of stunned) like your highest levels of politicians accuse each other of constant, and criminal, levels of lying and theft.

      What are we SUPPOSED to think but that America is a bunch of crooks? We're trying not to do that, but you, sir, are not helping.

    8. Re:fr0sted by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Rule of Law.

      We have a constitution which has delegated some powers to the Federal Government and left the rest for the state along with individual rights.

      Immigration is within the province of the Federal government. Not the states.

      Undermining the rule of law is the first step to tyranny as at that point the only standard is force.

      You want to role back Imperial Washington? Good. Roll back its powers.

      You want government provided health care? Good. Do it at the state level.
      You want government funding for the roads? Good. Do it at the state level.
      You want government provided education? Good. Do it at the state level.

      Whatever you do don't do it at the Federal level if your goal is to limited Imperial Washington.
      If you want to limit Washington and you aren't limiting its powers as mentioned above ... then I don't believe that you're serious about your stated goal.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    9. Re: fr0sted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all Americans. Just the black and brown ones.

    10. Re: fr0sted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Nero, who declared whatever he did was lawful, ala Nixon (R), wasn't a dictator by your logic. Good to know!

    11. Re: fr0sted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. And the US is doing everything it can to prevent people from speaking freely. Protests are labeled riots and protesters are goaded into violence or falsely accused.

      Gerrymandering makes undesirable votes less visible and less impactful.

      The system is broken and the current direction of things won't stop until money gets out of politics or our leadership gets rounded up and killed. Sometimes you gotta start shit brand new. The US is no exception.

    12. Re:fr0sted by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Obama was part of the federal government, and he exercised completely sane discretion in immigration enforcement (in that particular area). Sanctuary cities are just NOT helping the federal government, the same as states are not helping the DEA. This is government INACTION, which is the polar opposite of what tyranny entails.

      For goddamn fucking sakes, Obama signed a law (NDAA) that overturned the MAGNA MOTHERFUCKING CARTA, and your stupid ass is whining about him not wasting money catering to fear of brown people. If our government was otherwise a paragon, you might have a decent point, but the goddamn house is on fire, and you're whining about the soup being cold.

      If you want to argue that Obama was a tyrant, I will heartily agree, but you are picking the most bullshit point for no clear reason.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    13. Re:fr0sted by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      I didn't say Obama was a tyrant. Not at all. But, if you're scared of the US going down the road of tyranny then having an Executive Branch that is willfully not enforcing Constitutional laws passed by Congress then yes ... that is one small step down the path of tyranny.

      He did not exercise sane discretion he did not follow said law. In this case the President is like a contractor who has discretion about whether to paint the molding first or the walls. He doesn't have the discretion to say that he will not paint the walls because of x, y or z.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    14. Re:fr0sted by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      But, if you're scared of the US going down the road of tyranny then having an Executive Branch that is willfully not enforcing Constitutional laws passed by Congress then yes ... that is one small step down the path of tyranny.

      I would agree that enforcing an unconstitutional law would be tyranny, but not enforcing a constitutional law is not the same thing. Obama also did something similar in regards to federal marijuana enforcement in states with legal weed. That was "willfully not enforcing Constitutional laws pass by Congress," and yet, you'd be an idiot to call that a precursor to tyranny.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    15. Re:fr0sted by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1
      So.

      1. A law is passed by Congress.
      2. It was not vetoed by the President.
      3. It was not challenged in court (or if it was it was upheld by the courts)

      It is now the Executive Branch's responsibility to execute said law. It is not up to the President whether or not to act on this law. By not enforcing the law he is, in effect, vetoing the law and abrogating his constitutional responsibilities. Imagine if Eisenhower did not enforce Brown v Board of Ed?

      Unlike Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower possessed, at most, a tepid commitment to human rights, ...
      The real problem for the administration came in the form of the civil rights movement domestically ...
      A clearly distressed Eisenhower was compelled to call in the National Guard to enforce the court's decision and to protect from mob violence the African American students who were scheduled to attend the high school.

      Read more: http://www.americanforeignrela...

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    16. Re:fr0sted by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      So, by your rules, Obama needs to enforce our marijuana laws to avoid tyranny?

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    17. Re:fr0sted by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      It's not Obama - it's the executive branch. (And the US isn't tyranny - I was arguing against the OP who was talking about tyranny) By substituting Whim and Power over Rule of Law you slowly are walking down the path towards tyranny. The US isn't a tyranny now. Not by a long shot.

      If the Legislative Branch passes a law then the law needs to be followed. If one disagrees with the law then change it, or persuade others to change it by voting people out of / into office (as the case may be).

      I am for the legalization of drugs. But if I was President and the law of the land required the Federal (not State) Government to consider drug procession a crime then it is my obligation, as head of the Executive Branch, to execute said laws. I would endeavor to persuade Congress and the citizenry to change their mind but I cannot chose to ignore said law because I disagreed with it.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    18. Re:fr0sted by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      I will at least applaud your consistency, but when it comes to enforcement, it's not a bug, it's a feature. Our system has many checks against tyranny, and separation of powers is one of the biggest. The executive branch can choose to not enforce laws, provided there isn't some kind of systematic selective enforcement of the law. However, the executive branch cannot enforce laws that Congress did not pass. Thus, the net result is that laws are only carried out when there is support from all three branches of government. If one branch does not support it, then that branch neuters the ability for the others to act.

      The above is framed in constitutional terms, so it's what the government CAN do. By contrast, what the government SHOULD do is often drastically different. Without the law being unjust, it should be enforced fairly and consistently.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    19. Re:fr0sted by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      It is my understanding that the President CANNOT chose which law to act on and which law to ignore.

      Haven't time to do an in depth search proving why not - but here is a series of answers to that very question:

      https://politics.stackexchange...

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    20. Re:fr0sted by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      The president doesn't have a hard power to prevent the enforcement of the law. But he's got plenty of soft influence, and all law enforcement agencies have enough work to prioritize. As long as those in other powerful positions are cooperative, they can basically set the priority of a particular law or scenario low enough that it's never enforced. Other than a few things explicitly mentioned in the constitution, the government doesn't really HAVE to do very much. So, in practice, an executive branch in agreement can NOT do just about anything.

      Again, the separation of powers specifically exists to limit the power of the government to act.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    21. Re: fr0sted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worry not, friend. The haughty Europeans will understand our struggle soon enough.

  4. Facebook, Google, Twitter ... starts fact-checking by dslmodem · · Score: 2

    Living in US, my concern is the fact-checking effort from Facebook, Google, Twitter.... https://www.usatoday.com/story... It sounds good on the surface. In the end, it won't be rosy. In a democratic society, the ultimate way to prevent fabricated facts is education. However, our public education system is ...?!

    --

    ^(oo)^pig~

  5. Nope. by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Orwell would've been amazed at the ingenuity of people and technology and the new ways of manipulating society he never thought of. He would admit that Huxley was closer to reality than him.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re: Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Proof? You don't what the fuck Orwell would have thought, stop assuming.

    2. Re: Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof of what he thought? I think he wrote a book about it... Called it "1984". Maybe perhaps you should read it.

    3. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1984 - Flood everyone with so much meaningless information that nothing is relevant. Even the structure of language itself so that there are no words for concepts such as "democracy".

      Brave New World - Information is on a need to know basis, with the Alphas having access to all information and the Deltas/Epsilons living in ignorance.

    4. Re: Nope. by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      I suspect he would think it's double plus ungood.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    5. Re: Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When someone is whimsically musing inconsequential rhetoric, a raging CITATION boner is even more pointless yet.

      Or did you think we exhume corpses every time someone says "spinning in his/her grave"?

    6. Re: Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you think Rowling thinks there's a secret society of wizards using magic.

      You're a fucking moron.

    7. Re: Nope. by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a fiction book totally represents what someone truly believes and would not edit for content, clarity and customer, amongst other things. Nope.

  6. people complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About bad news and about good news. More news at 11

  7. Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by ugen · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In the age where commercial journalism is driven by profit into an ever deepening cycle of selling fear, positive news is a pretty darn good thing. I am not sure how to counterbalance that with the negative news properly, but I am sure that when left fully to "market forces", news cycle is not at all balanced or fair.

    As a humorous aside, in a recent meetup in Shanghai I met a guy whose job is "social media censor". Pleasant fella, speaks good English, and assured everyone that "he's a bad censor and never actually suppresses any posts" :)

    I kinda wish we had some of these guys here, though (but may be suppress posts based on authors's apparent IQ rather than content bias)

    1. Re:Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the age where commercial journalism is driven by profit into an ever deepening cycle of selling fear, positive news is a pretty darn good thing. I am not sure how to counterbalance that with the negative news properly, but I am sure that when left fully to "market forces", news cycle is not at all balanced or fair.

      In earlier times, humanity would rely on journalists to deliver this thing we call "news". Sometimes it was good. Sometimes it was bad. Ultimately, society determined it had value well beyond mere entertainment.

      Today, they merely sell bullshit entertainment for profit in many different flavors. This is what we now value, and because of that, governments are finding it rather easy to "cheerleader" bullshit to cover up truth whenever they feel it necessary. Remember when propaganda and censorship was a bad thing? Yeah, it's been so damn long I don't remember either.

      As far as being balanced and fair, the world is a rather fucked place and never promised to be fair. I'd prefer to maintain value in truth rather than dispel false illusions of grandeur to maintain balance. Without value in truth and facts, journalism turns into nothing more than horoscope reading.

    2. Re:Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      In the age where commercial journalism is driven by profit into an ever deepening cycle of selling fear, positive news is a pretty darn good thing.

      You seem to be suggesting that this is a new thing. Try reading newspapers from the eighteen-nineties sometime.....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re: Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by fubarrr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >As a humorous aside, in a recent meetup in Shanghai I met a guy whose job is "social media censor". Pleasant fella, speaks good English, and assured everyone that "he's a bad censor and never actually suppresses any posts" :)

      It might be a surprise to some, but Chinese municipalities do recruit foreigners for work in propaganda departments quite enthusiastically

    4. Re:Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have APK, creimer, and the trump army of useful idiots (BTW APK is in this group as well) to overwhelm discussion here. We don't need Chinese social media propagandists too.

    5. Re:Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      If he speaks good English at least one of you doesn't speak English well.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re:Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      inb4 MCU (Musk Cocksucking Unit)(WindBourne, Rei, Teancum...) chimes in

    7. Re:Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want what exactly? You want govt agents to ...?
      Cheer for when 22 millions people lose health care? 'Yay, we passed a healthcare bill!'
      Cheer for when police are not convicted of faking evidence or abusing suspects? 'Yay, the police are keeping you safe!'

      I came here to say that people are probably shrugging about this now, but if China decides to meddle more in the politics of other countries, like Russia, this machine of theirs will be a big problem for the intended target.

      But I see your comment and I am non-plussed.

      If it wasn't for your old userid, I'd think you were a Putinbot.

    8. Re:Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > but if China decides to meddle more in the politics of other countries, like Russia, this machine of theirs will be a big problem for the intended target

      Prior to the US election, right wing sites were busy talking about the fact that Clinton, as secretary of state, approved a deal of US Uranium to a Russian company, and a principal in that company made a donation to the Clinton foundation. Snopes has the details: they rate the claim false (they debunk a strawman version of it), and then give details that you should still find interesting and maybe concerning, but there's no smoking gun or anything like that.

      Also there's something involving Bill Clinton taking a ton of cash for speeches in Russia, and for Podesta being on the board of some Russian company back in the day, or something. These guys have all offered statements on this in the media so you can get it straight from their mouths.

      MEANWHILE, ON TEAM BLUE

      While the right wing sites were building a narrative about Clinton-Russia connections, the left wing sites were building a narrative about Trump-Russia connections. There was an odd story about some DNS reference to a Russian DNS from Trump tower. It wasn't clear if it was true, what it means if true, or how it was found. There were stories about different other things related to Russia, some of which have been adapted to fit the modern Russian narrative. There were meetings between Kushner and some Russians, one that hit the media pretty recently.

      HERE'S THE POINT:

      There was going to be a "Russian narrative" no matter who won. EITHER right wingers would be convinced that Clinton was in the payroll of Russia, or left wingers would be convinced that Trump was in the payroll of Russia. The "Russians colluded with our president was PRE-ORDAINED to be a story the media run with in 2017", REGARDLESS OF PRESIDENT. Certainly, most, most, certainly, regardless of any collusion, or payoffs, or actual reality to any of it.

      Now I'm not saying this is China. But it WOULD serve their interests for America to distrust their government, and to be angry at Russia. And based on what was on the net in summer/fall 2016, it was absolutely inevitable that a decent chunk of Americans would believe that, REGARDLESS OF VICTOR.

      You were always going to spend 2017 discussing Russia and the President. What your views would be on that depend entirely on which president run and whether you are more red or more blue. But this was going to happen, 100%.

    9. Re: Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      [citation needed]

      You can't be a foreigner and be in the Communist Party. They had a few back in the 50s, but they were all arrested and imprisoned during the Cultural Revolution for being dirty capitalist spies.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re: Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You can't be a foreigner and be in the Communist Party.

      Yes, but the majority of government employees are not CCP members whatsoever, and the ratio of party members to non-party-members has been going down for a long time.

      >[citation needed]

      Just two month ago, a number vacancies was posted to 51job by the city of Guangzhou municipality

    11. Re:Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by skids · · Score: 1

      I think ugen's point is, and I agree, not that this is a good thing, but a "good idea" as in an effective tactic, and that the reason it is an effective tactic is because people seem to be pre-inclined to fill their information bubbles with the most outrageous, negative news they can find. This makes the market for real good news unprofitable, and so none is produced, despite there being plenty of people doing lots of really good things all the time. Then when people get exhausted from the online dystopia they have created for themselves and thrash around for some reason to regain hope for humanity, the fake good news is there to greet them, written by government stooges and full of subtle contextual lies that benefit the establishment.

    12. Re: Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Censorship is an affront to a free citizenry. I'll defend my right to free speech till the death.

    13. Re:Sounds like a pretty good idea, actually by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

      We don't need China's help to distrust the government. They take care of fostering that distrust all by themselves.

  8. LOL. Watch when bots are smart enough to to this.. by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... errrm, wait, they are already. Ok, scratch that.

    Basically we're all living in a bubble already, it's only getting bigger and thicker, and China only is ahead a little bit because they have huge amounts of expendable labour to do this sort of thing manually and are a little more on the "single party" side of things that, for instance, the US. But to think that the society of the US is any free'er than that of China (it may be for a privileged group but that's about it) is almost absurd. Same goes for the bubbling void or reality that is the intarweb and it's surroundings here in Europe. Someone at Google just has to turn a few knobs and 2 weeks in a new belief will spread throughout society. This isn't really news.

    The interesting thing is that this just emphasiszes what we all know already: The internet isn't the real world and reality in society happens where people meet in RL and interact with one another. No amount of internent communication (manipulated or otherwise) will change that.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  9. They may have perfected it, but... by terraformer · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...the Democrats and the institutional media in the US have been playing this game for years and frankly N. Korea has essentially made the Kim family gods using this strategy. It's not really novel to blow smoke up people's asses for the gain of political power, just the methodology has gone digital for the internet age.

    --
    Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    1. Re:They may have perfected it, but... by computational+super · · Score: 0
      look at the White House

      Yes, definitely - look at what inevitably happens when one side has to adopt the tactics that the other side has been so successful with for the past 40 years.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    2. Re:They may have perfected it, but... by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      ...the Democrats and the institutional media in the US have been playing this game for years

      Because the alternative media is SO much more truthful...

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re: They may have perfected it, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alex Jones is a beacon of truth and light in an otherwise African American world!

    4. Re:They may have perfected it, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Democrats. Right, bwahahaha the Democrats! Not the Russian Trump regime. Funny!

    5. Re:They may have perfected it, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, the fact that you're here blaming Democrats and the media pretty much says it all. No, the "alts" aren't any better. No, Trump is not anti-establishment. If he were, then he wouldn't be slurping down Putin's load and crying about Congress cock-blocking him.

    6. Re: They may have perfected it, but... by ZorroXXX · · Score: 1

      Really? (Alex Jones: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver)

      Although based on the phrase "African American" it sound to me like you have strong us-vs-them "enemy" point of view that you have incorporated into your identity and are unable and unwilling to change.

      --
      When you are sure of something, you probably are wrong (search for "Unskilled and Unaware of It").
    7. Re:They may have perfected it, but... by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 1

      "The Democrats and the institutional media" is a strange way to say "Fox News."

      --
      Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
      Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
    8. Re:They may have perfected it, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird how these vatniks get modded up in groups. Anyways, nobody's buying what you're selling.

    9. Re:They may have perfected it, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overt lying, public berating of cabinet members, and belittling judges is not the modus operandi. Blaming the media for nearly everything is a pathetic cop-out.

      It worked for Bill Clinton.

    10. Re:They may have perfected it, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, yeh, the Dems. Let's see... who was it that was cheerleading the U.S. going back to Iraq in 2001? hmm....

    11. Re:They may have perfected it, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, do tell what is comes?

    12. Re:They may have perfected it, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia! Russia! Russia! Oh, and the leaking is Fake news. Russia! Russia! Russia! I don't think our media and social media are as bad as DPRK and PRC Russia! Russia! Russia! but they do seem to drown out the good things this administration does Marsha! Marsha! Marsha! with a lot of delusional noise.

  10. China or US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the study replaced US with China to get it through? Because I think US has been doing this for a long time. Maybe not intentionally but just by developing the Web2.0 where users themselves generate the content. Then it is simply a matter of keeping multiple viewpoints balanced and tied to create a good distraction.

  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. The Singing Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Trump is not happy being president. He apparently wants to be a dictator.

    Watch The Singing Trump, with 4 men dressed as Secret Service Agents, on America's Got Talent. The Singing Trump says who he loves.

    In the 2nd song of that performance, see the laughing when he says, "Am I original?"

    Watch the 1st audition. The judges and audience were shocked.

    Whether people like it or not, it definitely is political commentary.

    1. Re:The Singing Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trump is not happy being president. He apparently wants to be a dictator. ...

      So, you were happy when Obama unilaterally changed ACA deadline dates, despite the laws mandated dates?

    2. Re: The Singing Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posters like you are the people who would cheer removing Hitler while you replaced him with Stalin.

      Nice logical fallacies underpinning your obsession with Obama.

    3. Re: The Singing Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So yes, you liked your pretender, and you're pissed that the empress didn't get anointed as was due her.

    4. Re: The Singing Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing how many people that support Trump assume that the opposite is unquestioning support for Obama/Clinton.

      A pox on both their houses...

    5. Re: The Singing Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another logical fallacy.

  13. North Korea got there first by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

    Best internet dissent suppression possible: no internet at all. And btw, NK already perfected that cheerleading strat; the Chinese are just applying it to the internet in larger numbers.

  14. The US way is way more efficient by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And insidious, too.

    Just make sure you have enough crackpots to spread bullshit about. The more insane the conspiracy theory, the better. From Chemtrails to Flat Earth, from Reptiloids to Hitler's base on the dark side of the moon, just make sure you flood everything that people could possibly use to get non-approved news with enough bullshit that nobody would want to wade through the pits of steaming shit in the vain search for tangible information.

    It is way more efficient than trying to suppress non-approved information. Because if you try to suppress it, every little bit of leaked info can be scrutinized by the people wanting to see for themselves what the world has in store for them and what really happens. But when you make sure that anything that could threaten your narrative is drowned in the noise of utter bullshit, people will not even bother trying.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:The US way is way more efficient by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      hmm.. sounds like someone has read Foundations of Geopolitics ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... )

      --
      once more into the breach
    2. Re: The US way is way more efficient by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      Stop trying to fool us, lizard man.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    3. Re:The US way is way more efficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're shitting me, right? Some sci-fi geeks who like a bit of conspiracy theory are not what this is about. This is about sites like reddit.

    4. Re:The US way is way more efficient by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You're shitting me, right? Some sci-fi geeks who like a bit of conspiracy theory are not what this is about. This is about sites like reddit.

      Ignorant shitlord bullies are created by compromising the public education system with sports, religion, and unfunded mandates.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:The US way is way more efficient by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ok, what the fuck has one to do with the other?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re: The US way is way more efficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if we take those things out of education how would we know which lizard to vote against?

    7. Re:The US way is way more efficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US is basically controlled by the elites and their control of the MSN. They do a masterful job of using media to manipulate your thoughts and/or drown you in a sea of endless entertainment.

    8. Re:The US way is way more efficient by crafoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, ignorant bullies are created by subverting the educational system with moral relativism, unworkable Marxist ideologies, identity politics (itself a re-purposing of Marxist ideas), destruction of competitive spirit and meritocracies. Just listen to the nonsense coming out of "educated" university kids' mouths.

    9. Re:The US way is way more efficient by ponraul · · Score: 1

      NWO PLANT DETECTED

  15. Fake News is pre-internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If there's anything the internet has shown us, is that Fake News has been occurring ever since there was a media, and especially since the media became operating arms of weapons manufacturers.

    1. Re:Fake News is pre-internet by Jerry · · Score: 1

      "especially since the media became operating arms of weapons manufacturers."
      AND, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat Party, which is a shell corporation for the Communist Party.
      https://youtu.be/PblVo9y735k?t...

      --

      Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  16. Reddit is way ahead of them by computational+super · · Score: 1

    I think they did all their experimenting with Marxism on Reddit to make sure it would actually work.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    1. Re:Reddit is way ahead of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could not agree more. Remember when Eglin Air Force Base was outed as reddit's most engaged city!? LOL. How quickly people forget. Reddit is the perfect example. But, reddit also uses a LOT of selective deleting to make everything LOOK democratic, even when one side is actually editing the dialog to fit. There's no doubt there are a TON of people out there using this technique (drown the signal out with even more noise that you choose, until the noise is the signal), including and especially, governments, political parties, NGOs, lobbying groups and corporations. It's scary because it works. And, it's not usually detached from censorship, it just allows the censorship to be used more sparingly, making it harder to detect. The average person just will not believe in conspiracies like this, all the while they are right under our nose.

  17. Re:This article is fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all chinks are the same

    "Dude, please! The preferred nomenclature is, 'Chinese American.'"

  18. Re:its called slashdot moderation system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5 insightful (and fearless)

  19. Positive news worhtless without substance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > overwhelms the population with positive news

    The problem emerges is when there is no substance behind positive news. If you say the mini-plenty chocolate allowance (or whatever it's called in Orwell's english original) has been augmented to 25 grams per week, instead of the previous 30, few people will cheer.

    On the other hand, in a country where the guvmint can sincerely announce that 5 new hospitals have been built last quarter, 10 panda families saved, three more counties are getting linked by autobahn and HST until end of the year, materinity leave option is extended by further 4 months, inflation and unemplyoment are both at 3% and GDP has been steadily growing 5-6% per annum during the last decade - well, in such a place there is no need to quell dissent, because any dissent will be just mild creative criticism, rather than opposition or resistance.

  20. It's not a novel concept by the_skywise · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Look at Yelp or Glassdoor or any place that allows for "open reviewing and commenting"

    Both my apartment complex AND my company regularly spam review sites with "good newz everyone!" reviews. Like multiple 5 star ratings in a day after weeks of bad reviews.

    Even on Amazon the review system is notoriously gamed - so it shouldn't be surprising that nations have adopted the same strategies.
    You can probably even point to early newspapers that were funded by political cronies as an aspect of the same thing
    On the bright side at least the dissenting voices are being heard in China instead of the usual state-run monolithic media.

  21. Just believe what authorites tell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Why NASA 'cuts live feed from International Space Station
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    UFO Sightings NASA Shuts Live Video Feed As Massive UFO Appears
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    UFO caught on ISS live feed before NASA cuts off 'again'
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    I am sure they're not hiding anything, it's just coincident that they cut the live feed every time something show up.

    1. Re:Just believe what authorites tell you by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      I've seen Valerian, so I know how this ends.

    2. Re:Just believe what authorites tell you by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      OMG, a tiny dot moves across the screen. UFOs confirmed!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. Why limit it to "Flood the web in China" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect that not only do the "Flood the web in China", but the people in China also "Flood the Web in the USA".

    We are focused on Russia for interfering with our elections. Of course ______ * _____ is interfering with our elections also using increasingly sophisticated propaganda campaigns. *(international banks/corporations/nations/media conglomerates/foundations)

    Meanwhile, people in middle america are unemployed, under educated, impoverished, depressed and addicted. But their health doesn't matter because they are stupid and deplorable.

    Democracy for the people (particularly the bottom 50% of the IQ bell curve) is almost dead (and it is happening on our watch). Citizens of the world, CCP is a model of our future, unless we act.

  23. Not just old news, but old /. news!!! by Nutria · · Score: 3, Informative

    https://yro.slashdot.org/story/17/06/23/1442206/chinese-government-fabricates-social-media-posts-for-strategic-distraction-not-engaged-argument

    In contrast to prior claims, we show that the Chinese regime's strategy is to avoid arguing with skeptics of the party and the government, and to not even discuss controversial issues.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:Not just old news, but old /. news!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Old /. news"? You must be new here..

  24. Cheerleading is wayyyyy old-school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heck, it goes back to ancient times.

    It's not just governments, but religions, corporations, and other institutions have all done this for millennia.

    All China did was put it on the Intertubes on a massive scale.

  25. This is what India does as well by pkphilip · · Score: 1

    This is exactly the approach that the present Indian government is also using. Their intent is to use propaganda, lies and an army of trolls to control dissent, distract people from what is really happening and also to suppress any hint of an opposition.

    One of the former members of this huge paid army even released a book on it:
    http://www.amazon.in/Am-Troll-...

    The Prime Minister Modi himself follows some of the worst members of this troll army who use rape threats, murder threats and whatever else against anyone engaging in any form of dissent.

    The BJP party which is in power is the primary backers and the ones who run this troll army:
    http://mashable.com/2016/12/27...

  26. The Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is if they are actively avoiding the fixing of the actual problems instead of just avoiding to talk about them. Maximizing instability isn't a sound strategy for a party that wants to minimize instability. And reason for the latter is of course their inherent realization of the increasing illegitimacy of their own power.

  27. Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are already people doing the exact same thing. And they have been under the radar for about a decade.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VANK

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Chinese "water army" yet again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China did this long ago - anyone recall the "Chinese Water Army" https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22Chinese+Water+Army%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/ ?

    * Straight outta the "George Soros playbook" (lol!).

    APK

    P.S.=> So, in other words, they're up to their SAME OLD TRICKS... apk

  30. 9/11 remember and all complot theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that was all to hide embarassing fact, US authorities had the opportunity to try prevent 9/11 but did nothing you guess what, Bush was in office, and needed some "good reason", to end up the work of his father, END saddam's regime.
    Since day 1, Bush 43 was already about saddam ( see clinton's book my life ).
    While the real thing may have likely be, US secret services likely been ordered to look elsewhere at time of 9/11, when it was about radical islamism, for president Bush to take the opportunity of any future blast to promote HIS was in iraq.
    Hence US secret services said they never "received" the following report, warning them, of any future attack.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSL1612543820070416
    When some investigations may have taken place, to prove they were ordered to look elsewhere. They ran this flooded mentra "comploting theory", Every day a new one, to make people and press busy, while days after days thinking it was all BS.

  31. Not just China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same thing is happening in Hungary (or dare I say, Hungaristan) right now.

  32. YouTube SJW corpratist help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those YouTube executive SJWs are likely behind this. Committing human rights violations in the name of social injustice and corporate oligarchy which reigns supreme over government, communist or democratic.

  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. I provide a useful tool but I'm no idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

    (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

    I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

    APK your posts on this & the hosts file posts, and more, have never been in error &/or bad advice by BlueStrat

    Your premise that hostfiles are a good way to deal with advertising & malvertising is quite valid by JazzLad

    I like your host file system by Karmashock

    * It's recommended/hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!

    APK

    P.S.=> China imitated me http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/26/boffins_supercharge_the_hosts_file_to_save_users_plagued_by_dns_outages/ - more coming in part #2... apk

  35. Insidious methods! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only are they using the internet to do this, but they also consistently raise the quality of life of their citizens. It's evil genius!

    1. Re: Insidious methods! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raise the quality of life for _some_ citizens.

  36. As an aside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the article summary could have had 80% fewer words and still have gotten all the important facts across. All the rest was just self-indulgent logorrhea.

  37. Come on now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What country doesn't produce pro-government propaganda? I understand it is different in China than the US but seriously we shouldn't act like it is some foreign thing that we have never heard of when our government does the same stuff.

  38. Artificial Inanity by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    I am reminded of this passage from Neal Stephenson's novel Anathem:

    “Early in the Reticulum-thousands of years ago-it became almost useless because it was cluttered with faulty, obsolete, or downright misleading information,” Sammann said.

    “Crap, you once called it,” I reminded him.

    “Yes-a technical term. So crap filtering became important. Businesses were built around it. Some of those businesses came up with a clever plan to make more money: they poisoned the well. They began to put crap on the Reticulum deliberately, forcing people to use their products to filter that crap back out. They created syndevs whose sole purpose was to spew crap into the Reticulum. But it had to be good crap.”

    “What is good crap?” Arsibalt asked in a politely incredulous tone.

    “Well, bad crap would be an unformatted document consisting of random letters. Good crap would be a beautifully typeset, well-written document that contained a hundred correct, verifiable sentences and one that was subtly false. It’s a lot harder to generate good crap. At first they had to hire humans to churn it out. They mostly did it by taking legitimate documents and inserting errors-swapping one name for another, say. But it didn’t really take off until the military got interested.”

    “As a tactic for planting misinformation in the enemy’s reticules, you mean,” Osa said. “This I know about. You are referring to the Artificial Inanity programs of the mid-First Millennium A.R.”

    “Exactly!” Sammann said. “Artificial Inanity systems of enormous sophistication and power were built for exactly the purpose Fraa Osa has mentioned. In no time at all, the praxis leaked to the commercial sector and spread to the Rampant Orphan Botnet Ecologies. Never mind. The point is that there was a sort of Dark Age on the Reticulum that lasted until my Ita forerunners were able to bring matters in hand.”

    Source

    --
    -kgj
  39. Re:LOL. Watch when bots are smart enough to to thi by gtall · · Score: 1

    It changed the U.S. presidential election. Where the rubber meets the road is the voting booth. If people are voting based on bad information, then bad candidates are elected to bad things with the public weal.

  40. Re:LOL. Watch when bots are smart enough to to thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that is a level-N game. Bots, humans, news... still a game.
    Knowing it is a game, you have to see if you can be a level N+1 player.

    Does knowing this make you able to beat a level N player? Even as an individual, and not a nation, now that you know slightly more about what and how they are doing, can you "win" more or "lose" less?

    I can. Reproducibly. And that means it isn't fake news after all. And that means that the wall of the bubble isn't as thick for me as it might be for someone else. Relatively speaking, the bubble wall is growing thinner for me.

    What information and understanding, what ideas in your head, would practically and not delusionally, reduce bubble thickness/improve winningness/reduce losingness?

  41. Useless research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a great example showing that these so called researchers at the so called top universities are doing -- useless research, politically driven, and not contributing to the welfare of the social world. No, I am not saying whether they are drawing right conclusions or not, but the real question is, given the terrible state of so many problems that exist today, who cares about the research topic these researchers are carrying out? It is a gigantic waste of tax payers' dollars.

  42. Re:Facebook, Google, Twitter ... starts fact-check by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    However, our public education system is ...?!

    ...run by Democrats?

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  43. dissent in a sea of assent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ah... so they do study the new york times after all... needle in the haystack, we've been doing that for years.

  44. Nope you are just a tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope you are just a tool.

    No one brought up your worthless software so why did your idiot self feel the need to bring it up?

    That is right, you don't have anything else so piss off.

    You are right that China does imitate you, just not how you think.

    They spam and overwhelm with propaganda, just like you do all the time, you big fat gay baby.

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. You're projecting, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Registered /.ers say I provide a program they like & use (what "your kind" can't ever do, lol) https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10944219&cid=54933297/ - all YOU ever do is troll & harass others by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts (some 'feat', lmao (not)).

    APK

    P.S.=> My using that fact in that link above easily shuts "your kind" (do-nothing "ne'er-do-wells", useless drags on society) every single time - have fun "raging out" KNOWING that others know what you are & yes, so do YOU (lol)... apk

  47. Here in the US, it's called "Fox News" by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

    "Fair and balanced" is a euphemism for state-propaganda machine!

  48. Re:Facebook, Google, Twitter ... starts fact-check by Cryacin · · Score: 1

    ...run by Homer Simpson?!?

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  49. Re:LOL. Watch when bots are smart enough to to thi by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

    The internet isn't the real world and reality in society happens where people meet in RL and interact with one another. No amount of internent communication (manipulated or otherwise) will change that.

    Fortunately they invented safe spaces to prevent that. You can't let all those years of carefully manipulated student thought get destroyed too easily.

  50. Shut up retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up retard. You add nothing of value to any discussion you participate in. Whenever you attempt to communicate it is so random that the entropy in the rest of the universe decreases by an order of magnitude to compensate.

  51. Re:LOL. Watch when bots are smart enough to to thi by larryjoe · · Score: 2

    But to think that the society of the US is any free'er than that of China (it may be for a privileged group but that's about it) is almost absurd.

    This is absolutely not correct. In the US, there is indeed constant propaganda that overwhelms our senses, but there are multiple, conflicting streams from a diverse range of sources covering the entire spectrum, and many of those streams directly attack and criticize the government and specific leaders with impunity. This situation does not exist in China. The actual set of ideas that flow through the US system may not be any more true or desirable than the in the Chinese system, but the US is absolutely much more free than the Chinese system solely due to the practical ability of anyone to inject their two-cent's worth of opinions and have those opinions reach the masses.

  52. That is why free speech is pure genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am starting to think the founding father did not have the best interest of the folk in their heart with the first amendment. You give the impression to the plebe they are free.... But in reality you bury dissenting speech in a flood of crap done by the plebe. This is probably the best genius idea to make sure counter speech is never hear of.


    Or alternatively it does not work like that, and your contention that news is flooded by a wave of crap is invalid.

    1. Re:That is why free speech is pure genius by Jerry · · Score: 1

      ??? Are YOU a plebe pouring out "crap"?

      --

      Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    2. Re:That is why free speech is pure genius by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Free speech is a great idea. But too many people confuse the right to speak the truth with the obligation to do so. Just because the media have the right to tell you something doesn't mean that it has to be right.

      What you need for this to work out are highly educated people, but why would anyone that has the power to provide this want that?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  53. The US media is much the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and they do it much more subtly. Chinese propaganda machine acts in a very stupid way. They keep yelling in your ears day and night to the point nobody believes them. The US media however will carefully piece together selected evidences to lead you to a preset conclusion, but they never tell you the conclusion directly, so that you'll believe you draw the conclusions on your own thinking, based on "facts".

  54. This is proven tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Living in eastern Europe, this is nothing new. You do not argue, you change the topic. This is happening in several countries, just on smaller scale. Government backed media is full of news like police returning stolen goods and great sports achievements and great turnout of crops and new playground opened. That are of no interest to the open public, but make you feel you live at a great place.

  55. Re: Facebook, Google, Twitter ... starts fact-chec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

    Pick up a school textbook anywhere in the country. I'm sure once you've read it you'll want to send a gift certificate for a handy J to the extraordinarily red Texas commission that picked it.

  56. I've seen it before by Jerry · · Score: 1

    It's exactly what the MNM did during the Obama administration to cover up its dozen scandals, and the exact opposite of what they are doing now to the Trump administration with fake news.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    1. Re:I've seen it before by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Lie

    2. Re:I've seen it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is a MNM? Master of Non-Profit Management? Please define this TLA if it not in common usage.

  57. Wow, perfect timing by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    In other news, Trump decides what is neus (sp is correct) using the China Model
    Tyrants of a feather and all that

  58. You're projecting AGAIN, lmao... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: ... & look @ YOU trying to use "big words" too like the 'pseudo-intellectual' that "your kind" always is - hahahahaha - what a WANNABE!

    * I love it - Especially making you "lose it" & "rage out"! It's what you "Soros LOSERS" always do... hehehehe!

    (QUESTION - Is your employer George Soros upset you can't keep your cool or what?? LMAO!)

    APK

    P.S.=> It's a FACT China did this before via their "water army" (or very much like this current 'tactic') - so won't you Puh-LEESE take your own advice, chump - ok??? Thanks!... apk

  59. I like the American approach better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The American approach being electing a president and then having 4 years of none stop press coverage of him and him alone and no coverage whatsoever of what goes on in congress, in the supreme court or the various governors mansions or local legislatures as if we were a dictatorships where this 1 person actually controlled the whole body of government. Turn on CNN -- it's all Trump 24/7. It's unwatchable drivel. We don't get real news from our media. We get a dog and pony showing centered around whoever is POTUS. The real governing gets zero coverage.

  60. Ends justify the means by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Hey man, if it avoids civil unrest of a billion people it might be justified.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  61. Similar in the West. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The only difference is that they use the "hate speech" smear to silence people.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  62. Re:LOL. Watch when bots are smart enough to to thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a little more on the "single party" side of things that, for instance, the US.

    One party, two parties, same thing.

  63. Ability to deal with problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will only handicap China. It'll pay dearly for its mistakes in the long run - self inflicted wounds.

  64. Re:Facebook, Google, Twitter ... starts fact-check by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

    However, our public education system is ...?!

    ...run by Democrats?

    Seriously? The current head of the DoE is a god-bothering, slack-jawed, single-digit IQ, cuntsack of a Republican. And the Republicans have made no secret at all of wanting to destroy public education in this country in order to continue spreading unquestioning religious idiocy. So yeah... there's that.

    I don't care much for the Democrats either, but at least they see the value in a decent, secular educated population.

    --
    "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  65. Why does every /. article about paid trolling only by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    After all, the majority of people who read comments on this site will only ever encounter paid trolls employed by US corporations, or the US government... or maybe Israel. And tons of them, at that. Weird how /. almost never has articles about American-paid trolling, when it is perhaps the most damaging variety for americans.

  66. Is the U.S. any different? by BrianMahoney1357 · · Score: 1

    From what I see, the people of China are happier than the people in the U.S. They can't vote and they're spied on but of the two, the first is the only difference between the U.S. and China. Besides, look who got voted in as President. That's what giving the vote to idiots gets you, doesn't it? As for happy news, isn't that what every State of the Union Address in living memory has put out to the public? Forget about the crumbling infrastructure and the endless poverty across the country, let's talk about the good things we've done. China isn't perfect, I know that very well, but neither is the U.S. The saying about the pot and the kettle comes to mind. As for human rights, the U.S. uses solitary confinement as torture plus they have GITMO for all the sickos who want to torture prisoners with their hands. Is that better than what we hear coming out of China?