Slashdot Mirror
Why Amazon's UK Tax Bill Has Dropped 50% (bbc.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from BBC: Amazon has seen a 50% fall in the amount of UK corporation tax it paid last year, while recording a 54% increase in turnover for the same period. This snippet of news raised eyebrows this morning when it was revealed. So what's going on? Taxes are paid on profit not turnover. It paid lower taxes because it made lower profits. Last year it made 48 million British Pounds (BP) or ~$62 million U.S. dollars (USD) in profit -- this year it made only 24 million BP or ~$31 million USD so it paid 7 million BP (~$9 million USD) tax compared to 15 million BP (~$19 million USD). What is more interesting is WHY its profits were lower. Part of the reason is the way it pays its staff. Amazon UK Services is the division which runs the fulfillment centers which process, package and post deliveries to UK customers. It employs about 16,000 of the 24,000 people Amazon have in the UK. Each full-time employee gets given at least 1,000 BP (~$1,297 USD) worth of shares every year. They can't cash them in immediately -- they have to hold them for a period of between one and three years.
If Amazon's share price goes up in that time, those shares are worth more. Amazon's share price has indeed gone up over the past couple of years -- a lot. In fact, in the past two years the share price has nearly doubled, so 1,000 BP (~$1,297 USD) in shares granted in August 2015 are now worth nearly 2,000 BP (~$2,595 USD). Staff compensation goes up, compensation is an expense, expenses can be deducted from revenue -- so profits are lower and so are the taxes on those profits.
If Amazon's share price goes up in that time, those shares are worth more. Amazon's share price has indeed gone up over the past couple of years -- a lot. In fact, in the past two years the share price has nearly doubled, so 1,000 BP (~$1,297 USD) in shares granted in August 2015 are now worth nearly 2,000 BP (~$2,595 USD). Staff compensation goes up, compensation is an expense, expenses can be deducted from revenue -- so profits are lower and so are the taxes on those profits.
The compensation relevant for taxes is the 1000 GBP the stock is worth when Amazon gives it and not its value at the end, right?
Only dead fish swim with the stream...
So when employees cash out they will have to pay tax. In the UK once they convert assets to fiat they will have to pay 20%
The interesting this about this is that you can earn A LOT more than than the usual 20% tax bracket and still pay 20%
The company is essentially pushing tax deductions on the employee with the employee seeing this a great deal to pay less tax as well...maybe even make profit as stock appreciates. It all falls apart however when share price goes sharply down and people may end up earning less than they thought they will AND pay tax on it when they cash out.
A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Seriously? Use the very standard GBP if your keyboard doesn't have a £. Maybe if it doesn't you can go on amazon and spend some AD on a new one.
Wanna buy a shirt?
https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
What the fuck are you talking about? Hard work doesn't matter in the UK, we're getting shafted hard and it's only going get harder once they trigger the inevitable nuclear brexit, the harder working the job the harder the shaft. What are these ridiculous and harmful social programs you resent? Do you mean the NHS? Some taxes are worth paying you know. Well, they are if they go to what they're supposed to instead of corporate welfare and massive billion quid bungs to hold on to power.
Wanna buy a shirt?
https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
"Hey, let's give corporations tax deductions for the cost of stocks they give to their CEOs!"
"Jolly good idea! CEOs can barely afford a third vacation house and a private jet. They need more shares of stock!"
"WTF? Why are we giving corporations tax deductions for the cost of stocks given to the peasants? This is an outrage!"
Do the social democracies like Germany or Norway invent amazing new technologies like the Internet or smartphones? No, that was the US,
Germany invented the first programmable computer, I'd like to see how your internet and smartphones would have worked without that. Also the smartcard, the first oscilloscope, SMS for cell phones, morphine, x-rays, etc. Norway's inventions include things like Object Oriented Programming.
Do your social democracies like the UK have the best health outcomes? No, that's the US - be chance of survival for infants, cancer, heart disease, HIV...
Despite the US spending nearly three times the amount per capita on health care as the UK (and even ignoring private money the US government spends almost 25% more than the UK on health care), the average life expectancy in the UK is 3 years longer than in the US, all cause mortality in the UK is lower than in the US, and specifically the UK has lower mortality rates for cancer and heart disease, and has half the infant mortality rate of the US. (I didn't immediately see figures for HIV)
Do you social democracies like France or Sweden perform huge amounts of medical R&D? No, that's the US, which provides half of the entire world's medical R&D.
Sweden spends more money per capita on medical research than the US. And in per-capita spending, the US is behind even such countries as Signapore and South Korea.