Scientists Discover 91 Volcanoes Below Antarctic Ice Sheet (theguardian.com)
Reader schwit1 writes: Scientists have uncovered the largest volcanic region on Earth -- two kilometres below the surface of the vast ice sheet that covers west Antarctica. The project, by Edinburgh University researchers, has revealed almost 100 volcanoes -- with the highest as tall as the Eiger, which stands at almost 4,000 metres in Switzerland. This is in addition to 47 already known about and eruption would melt more ice in region affected by climate change, the report added. Geologists say this huge region is likely to dwarf that of east Africa's volcanic ridge, currently rated the densest concentration of volcanoes in the world. And the activity of this range could have worrying consequences, they have warned. "If one of these volcanoes were to erupt it could further destabilise west Antarctica's ice sheets," said glacier expert Robert Bingham, one of the paper's authors. "Anything that causes the melting of ice -- which an eruption certainly would -- is likely to speed up the flow of ice into the sea.
One thing I have noticed about these guys who study ice sheets is that they worry a lot. They didn't even know there were 91 volcanoes there that have been there for who knows for how long. Yet they are "worried" about it, suddenly. Needs more money for studies I guess.
From the article:
"The most volcanism that is going in the world at present is in regions that have only recently lost their glacier covering – after the end of the last ice age. These places include Iceland and Alaska. Theory suggests that this is occurring because, without ice sheets on top of them, there is a release of pressure on the regions’ volcanoes and they become more active."
Not entirely unimportant, I think.
Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
Man caused the volcanoes to form under the ice by allowing cows to pass gas.
Sigh. After all these years of avoiding that, you finally got me, and at work no less.
Notice that all the posts (like mine) that are skeptical of global warming have been censored to -1. Science advances when people find problems with current theories and new theories have to be developed to explain the evidence. However, in the case of global warming, all the evidence against it is censored and the researchers have their character attacked. It's a shame that quality research is censored and science is being prevented from advancing in this area.
Haven't clicked on it but the /goat/ in the url address is a give-away...should have looked at the url. I do :)
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
We can't go to the stars because Physics.
Which came first?
It is very well possible that geothermal activitie at the base of these ice sheets is responsible to the degradation of the ice sheet, no?
You don't need a volcano to erupt to melt ice.
When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
You improperly read and pull any old shite from your anus to fling at science because it shows a problem your politics would rather ignore and cannot handle.
But not the man made variety. This is evidence of NATURAL climate change. In order for nearly 100 volcanoes to be underneath 2km of ice, what happened? Climate change. Once upon a time, that area was presumably very hot and with frequent volcanic activity. Some type of climate change occurred, a very radical one and all the volcanoes froze underneath all that ice.
There is no "natural" homeostasis for climate. Any suggestion of the like is really just human beings wanting to keep the climate ideal to their species' preferences indefinitely. Believe it or not, that is actually unnatural. It goes directly against the principles of entropy at work in the universe.
We'll make great pets
Yup, you figured out how to avoid it. Well done.
I come here for the love