Slashdot Mirror


WordPress Bans Fascist Website Linked To Charlottesville Killer (fastcompany.com)

tedlistens writes: WordPress has said that it does not censor websites like that of self-proclaimed fascist group Vanguard America. But last night, the group's site was taken offline for violating the company's terms of service. The about-face was likely prompted by Vanguard's participation in last weekend's Unite the Right rallies in Charlottesville, Virginia, during which James Alex Fields drove his car into a crowd, killing one person and injuring 19. Fields has claimed allegiance to Vanguard America; the group denies that Fields was a member. For WordPress to drop a site, even a fascist site, is a very big deal; the same is true of GoDaddy's and Google's decision to drop their registration of neo-Nazi site the Daily Stormer (another site that GoDaddy previously said would be permitted on free speech grounds). WordPress hasn't explained the shift in its approach to the website: the company's user agreement and terms of service have not changed since Charlottesville. That policy, like that of other tech platforms, has long stood by strict neutrality and freedom of expression. That may now be changing.

13 of 451 comments (clear)

  1. "Free speech is great, as long as it's not tits" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "That policy, like that of other tech platforms, has long stood by strict neutrality and freedom of expression."

    I call BS. There are plenty of platforms which like to spout that platitude, but have special rules when it comes to naked people. Other platforms disallow "adult content" altogether. Yet point out that a platform is supporting white supremacists, and the "free speech" card gets played.

    Nudity is treated as more offensive than racism. Think about how messed up that is. We're only seeing this reaction from GoDaddy / WordPress now because there were full-on Nazis in Charlottesville.

     

  2. Re:Social responsibility or a PR pre-emptive strik by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's just PR. It's not like corporations are people.

  3. Re:Are we sure that it's a free spech issue? by tsqr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does WordPress have anything in their terms of service about inciting violence, committing crimes, or breaking the law in general?

    If Vanguard America hasn't distanced themselves from the actions of this alleged member, perhaps they could be classified as a terrorist organization? This isn't necessarily an issue of free speech any more than breaking the law is.

    From the WordPress User Guidelines:

    Directly threatening material.
    Do not post direct and realistic threats of violence. That is, you cannot post a genuine call for violence—or death—against an individual person, or groups of persons. This doesn’t mean that we’ll remove all hyperbole or offensive language.

  4. Re:Time to start... by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pretty sure that there are going to be a lot of people thinking that they might be able to use terms of service to try and suppress sites with dissenting opinions to their own right now, from right across the political spectrum. The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and I suspect that GoDaddy, Google, WordPress, and the rest are about to find out it's a very steep and slippery one as well. First they came for the Alt-Right...

    On the otherhand, GoDaddy, Google, WordPress, et al are private companies and as such are free to set their own ground rules in the same way that malls, sports stadiums, and other private venues can - within reason - set their own specific rules while on their private property. A right to freedom of speech means that people have a right to say what they want, but is most certainly does not obligate others to provide them with a soap box to stand-on or force them to listen to what they want to say. As long as they are prepared to live *and* die by that sword, then that's entirely up to them - there are always going to be plenty of alternative vendors that are not quite so choosy.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  5. Re:Are we sure that it's a free spech issue? by c · · Score: 4, Informative

    Also from the WordPress User Guidelines:

    Bear in mind that these are just guidelines â" interpretations are solely up to us. These guidelines are not exhaustive and are subject to change.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  6. Nice try by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What? Are you high?

    Fascism is an economic model and has nothing to do with Donald Trump or Nazis.

    Really? Really???

    "Fascism is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and control of industry and commerce, that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe."

    "National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), more commonly known as Nazism, is the ideology and set of practices associated with the 20th-century German Nazi Party, Nazi Germany, and other far-right groups. Sometimes characterised as a form of fascism that incorporates scientific racism and antisemitism, Nazism's development was influenced by German nationalism (especially Pan-Germanism), the Völkisch movement and the anti-communist Freikorps paramilitary groups that emerged during the Weimar Republic after Germany's defeat in First World War."

    I'm sorry, but you absolutely do not get to paint this a color that pleases you.

    Fascism does indeed have a few economic ideas in it, but that's only a very small part of what fascism actually is. Saying Fascism is nothing more than an economic policy is like saying a five course dinner is about the glass of water they serve alongside it.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  7. If you're cheering this by mpercy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    action and google's and godaddy's, etc. just remember your position on this when GoHillary.com or BlackLivesMatter.org is taken down because the sites allow "hate speech" to be posted.

    We can fine an endless supply of "hateful" speech, even speech calling for violence on the left, too. The KKK has no monopoly on that.

    Black Lives Matter protester: 'Only good white man is a dead white man'.

    New Black Panther Party (NBPP), whose leaders are known for anti-Semitic and anti-white tirades. Its late chairman, Khalid Abdul Muhammad, famously remarked: “There are no good crackers, and if you find one, kill him before he changes.”

    Though she opposed [a proposed Constitutional anti-gay-marriage amendment], [Clinton] said that she believed that marriage was "a sacred bond between a man and a woman" and she took "umbrage at anyone who might suggest that those of us who worry about amending the Constitution are less committed to the sanctity of marriage, or to the fundamental bedrock principle that exists between a man and a woman." [Pretty hateful words, by today's LGBTTTQQIAA... standards].

    "White folks was in caves while we were building empires. We taught philosophy and astrology [sic] and mathematics before Socrates and those Greek homos ever got around to it." Al Sharpton [A gay slur, a nationalist slur, and a racist comment, all in one!]

    You cannot define "hate" speech to just include white-supremacist or other speech you disagree with. Because if you do, when power shifts or something bad happens, your speech is next. We didn't go and shut down any of the sites that James Hodgkinson was active on, and if Trump and the right had tried to do so, the media would--correctly, for once--said that would be wrong and a violation of free speech rights. We didn't go and shut down the mosque where Omar Mateen's anti-gay views were stoked by his religious indoctrination. It would have been wrong.

    When the KKK and Nazi's want to expose themselves and their idiotic and repugnant ideas, it's not a good idea to create martyrs-to-the-cause of any of them nor answer them with violence. That just feeds them.

  8. Re:Fascist by cryptizard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looks pretty peaceful to me. Nobody ran him over with a car. In fact, he was completely unharmed. Isn't this the kind of protest you spend hours on here defending?

  9. Re:Are we sure that it's a free spech issue? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Same as muslims calling for the execution of atheists and gays? Shut them down too?

    How about BLM saying there are "too many white people"?

    A business that is open to the general public must serve the general public. A bakery must sell to all customers and WordPress must sell to all customers.

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  10. Re:Social responsibility or a PR pre-emptive strik by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's completely different than opening the wallets of every American to bail out the Banking Industry. Thanks Republicans, for being SOOOOOOO smart that you don't need my money! Oh, wait...

    Before blaming that on Republicans, you should look at the facts: Democrats voted 172 to 63 in favor of the bailout, while Republicans voted 108 to 91 against it.

  11. Re:Social responsibility or a PR pre-emptive strik by Whibla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mmm, immigrants and globalism are the root of all the world's problems

    I can't say I saw GP say that they were.

    Your sarcastic statement, however, is as patently false as the statement: Immigrants and globalism don't cause any problems.

    Like most things, the truth is somewhere in between, and trying to pretend otherwise just makes people look like ignorant fools.

  12. Re:Are we sure that it's a free spech issue? by DRJlaw · · Score: 4, Informative

    No. They must bake the cake regardless of the symbols.

    No, they must bake the cake if they would bake the same cake for others without basing their refusal upon the customer being a member of a protected class.

    Here's a source backing my assertion. Where's a source backing yours?

  13. Re:Social responsibility or a PR pre-emptive strik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The woman died because a neo-Nazi fuckwit ran her over. There is no other reason no matter how much you try and whitewash it