Slashdot Mirror


IRS Now Has a Tool To Unmask Bitcoin Tax Evaders (thedailybeast.com)

SonicSpike shares a report from The Daily Beast: You can use bitcoin. But you can't hide from the taxman. At least, that's the hope of the Internal Revenue Service, which has purchased specialist software to track those using bitcoin, according to a contract obtained by The Daily Beast. The document highlights how law enforcement isn't only concerned with criminals accumulating bitcoin from selling drugs or hacking targets, but also those who use the currency to hide wealth or avoid paying taxes. The IRS has claimed that only 802 people declared bitcoin losses or profits in 2015; clearly fewer than the actual number of people trading the cryptocurrency -- especially as more investors dip into the world of cryptocurrencies, and the value of bitcoin punches past the $4,000 mark. Maybe lots of bitcoin traders didn't realize the government expects to collect tax on their digital earnings, or perhaps some thought they'd be able to get away with stockpiling bitcoin thanks to the perception that the cryptocurrency is largely anonymous.

"The purpose of this acquisition is to help us trace the movement of money through the bitcoin economy," a section of the contract reads. The Daily Beast obtained the document through the Freedom of Information Act. The contractor in this case is Chainalysis, a startup offering its "Reactor" tool to visualize, track, and analyze bitcoin transactions. Chainalysis' users include law enforcement agencies, banks, and regulatory entities. The software can follow bitcoin as it moves from one wallet to another, and eventually to an exchange where the bitcoin user will likely cash out into dollars or another currency. This is the point law enforcement could issue a subpoena to the exchange and figure out who is really behind the bitcoin.

25 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. Evading taxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How dare the little people!??? Only corporations who purchased the proper politician get to evade their personal responsibility.

    1. Re:Evading taxes? by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You most certainly enjoy many benefits of taxation; you just don't want to pony up your contribution. Enjoying benefits without contribution is theft.

      --

      Long signatures suck.
    2. Re: Evading taxes? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You may be joking, but there's plenty of assholes who think that they don't owe jack shit... but then turn around and use public roads, public services and enjoy living in a free country the freedom of which is paid for by tax money.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Evading taxes? by mlw4428 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Theft is a crime. The US Constitution specifically calls out the government's ability to tax. For all of your patriotism spouting, you don't seem like you've read the Constitution. And no, the Constitution places absolutely ZERO limits on the amount it may or may not tax you. It merely stipulates that what it taxes you must be used for debts, defence, and the General Welfare of the people.

      So no, it is not patriotic to avoid paying your taxes. It is laziness and against our very Constitution. Pay your debt to society or give up your citizenship and leave. Find yourself a nice 3rd world shithole Libertarian nation and live there. Freeloader.

    4. Re:Evading taxes? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't get dick for the half of my paycheck that is stolen by government.

      You want dick? Congratulations for coming out of the closet. But supplying dick is not part of the government's mandate. Obtaining it is left to your own initiative. You can start by posting a f*ck-ton of posts about why you love Apple, link to the Village People video in your sig, and take those assless leather cowboy chaps out of storage.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:Evading taxes? by edtice1559 · · Score: 2

      This should get modded down to -1. If you didn't have police protection, somebody would come take 100% of your paycheck. In fact even at 99% tax rate, you're better off than you would be without the police. So 50% is a bargain in that respect. And if you are really paying 50% in taxes, you have pretty good income. Taxes in this country are progressive, so poorer people pay a lower percentage.

    6. Re:Evading taxes? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      Fuck you. Taxation is theft.

      And if you didn't pay the taxes, anyone would be free to murder you and take your money without cause. Laws are just words with nothing to enforce them.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  2. bitcoin carries a permanent log by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bitcoin has a permanent log of all transactions going back to the very beginning. The log never goes away.

    As soon as a single trasnaction become tied to a real person then every transaction ever made by the person is exposed.

    Bitcoin is not anonymous. Never was never will be. Using for that purpose = fool. There are other cryptocurrencies designed for anonymous, bu tthey are not as popular so also not as useful.

    1. Re:bitcoin carries a permanent log by MrLogic17 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ^ This.

      The distributed ledger is the opposite of anonymous- everyone has a full copy of all transactions. To use a bank analogy, you have a land of numbered Swiss bank accounts, and the transactions are published in a daily newspaper. Cracking who owns what is simply an exercise in meta data analysis.

    2. Re:bitcoin carries a permanent log by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Yes and no, they then know who had that particular wallet true, they don't know who owned the last wallet up the chain or after which may or may not have been the same person. Of course the IRS has a habit of putting the burden of proving everything on the individual years after the fact when that individual had no reasonable expectation they'd have to account for something... even when they have explicitly not had to account for something decades prior.

      A dirty little secret of forensic accounting is that it makes assumptions regarding similar sized transactions and what looks likely numerically, by definition the conclusions sound good but are not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

    3. Re:bitcoin carries a permanent log by swillden · · Score: 2

      The distributed ledger is the opposite of anonymous- everyone has a full copy of all transactions.

      No, the use of a single ledger (distributed or not), is orthogonal to anonymity. It is totally possible to design a single distributed ledger, blockchain-based cryptocurrency which has anonymity guarantees. Bitcoin is simply not such a design; anonymity wasn't a design goal.

      What Bitcoin is, is a ledger full of pseudonymous transactions. Pseudonymity is not anonymity, though with sufficient care it is possible to ensure that a pseudonym is not tied to any real-world identity, achieving anonymity, but that's all outside the scope of what Bitcoin does.

      The problem here is that people want to think by analogy, rather than understanding the actual properties of the thing. If you use the mental shorthand that "Bitcoin is a digital form of cash", you'll expect it to be anonymous, and you'll be wrong. This is similar to the way people insist on analogizing biometric authentication with password authentication and then try to figure out whether the biometric is the password part or the username part, when in fact it's neither because it has entirely different properties.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  3. Re:Good representation of bitcoin users by stabiesoft · · Score: 2

    But it may be easier to prove they did not pay their taxes than to prove they sold drugs. IE, IRS: Where did that 500K in your bitcoin account come from? Drug seller: I don't know. IRS: You failed to declare that on your 1040, tax evasion, go directly to jail. Many criminals have been brought down by the IRS.

  4. Re:Better explanation by shaitand · · Score: 2

    "It's a strong indication that Bitcoin is mostly used for criminal activity."

    Hardly. By that logic everyone using cash are mostly engaged in criminal activity. Day-to-day people just aren't thinking about everything in terms of taxes. Ted buys Joe lunch, it never even crosses Joe's mind to log the lunch and the amount so he can pay taxes on it later.

    This is akin to the IRS announcing they've bought software to perform forensic analysis of lunch purchases because less than 300 people reported income from lunch gains in 2015. Hell, the IRS didn't even have rules that told you HOW to report Bitcoin as such in 2015 a lot of people who did some significant amount of trade likely did report but declared it via some other mechanism like capital gains or business income.

  5. Taxes and crime by sjbe · · Score: 2

    To be brutally honest, the types of transactions that most people make with Bitcoin (drug buys, money laundering, etc) aren't exactly the ones you want to report to the government. If they were dumb enough to report those to the IRS, they'll have problems worse than tax evasion to worry about.

    I wouldn't bet on that. Tax evasion is how they put Al Capone in prison. If you look on line 21 of the standard 1040 form you will see it says "Other income. List type and amount". It may as well say "report earnings from illegal drugs and other crimes here". This is where they get drug dealers because ANY income has to be reported by law, whether or not it was legally obtained. So if you don't report the earnings from drug deals (or any other crime) they bust you for tax evasion even if you manage to avoid prosecution for the crime itself.

    Being a buyer doesn't really save you either. Use taxes, sales taxes, excise taxes, and more can all apply depending on what state you live in.

    There are some interesting fifth amendment constitutional law issues regarding mechanisms used to collect taxes on illegal drugs. In some cases reporting drug earnings can violate your rights against self incrimination depending on how it is done.

  6. Taxes != theft by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fuck you. Taxation is theft.

    If you don't want to pay taxes go live in somewhere where you don't use any of the benefits of paying taxes. No rule of law, no police or other first responders, no roads, no military, no contract enforcement, no judicial system, limited health care, no public education, no science research, no parks, no vaccines, no space program, no internet, no food safety, no drug safety, etc. If you want to live in a civilized society shut up and pay your taxes and stop selfishly whining about it. You benefit from the results too. Taxes are only theft in the minds of stupid and selfish people.

    1. Re:Taxes != theft by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Informative

      Somalia looks like his preferred place to live. No taxation there. Well, provided you can keep the bandits at bay.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Taxes != theft by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Venezuela is getting there pretty damn fast. And the shit-hole known as India*, where tax evasion was so bad that they had to change the currency. 60% of households are without a toilet, no proper sewer system, people shitting in the open on sidewalks, that's what tax avoidance gets you. It's now even grounds for divorce because an Indian court has finally ruled that making women hold it in until after sunset so they can take a dump outside (hopefully unseen) is cruelty.

      They keep saying "taxation is theft," but ignore the fact that if you don't pay your fair share, you're stealing from everyone else who has to make up the difference. Not paying tax is theft.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:Taxes != theft by jittles · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Taxation to provide benefits that are Not common goods is also theft. For example: If the government collects $100 from 1000 taxpayers, and then spends $100000 on a project or service that only benefits 100 taxpayers, for example, maybe that tax money goes to a service that only helps parents with children, and 900 taxpayers don't have kids, then that is stealing $100 from 900 taxpayers.

      I agree with you wholeheartedly. That's why we need to end public education. I don't receive ANY benefit whatsoever from public schools. It's not like those schools keep children busy and out of trouble. And I don't want educated employees for my company. I want poor, uneducated masses that I can exploit for as little as possible. It's not like they'll turn to crime out of boredom or sheer desperation or anything like that.

    4. Re: Taxes != theft by KGIII · · Score: 2

      There is lots of taxation in Somalia. You just don't recognize the governments that impose those taxes.

      There's a whole lot if government in Somalia. You may know them by the name, 'warlords.'

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:Taxes != theft by stephenmac7 · · Score: 2

      The fact that India is not as developed as the United States says nothing about the effect of taxation or tax avoidance. You can't say "Bob is fat and Ronald is not. Bob is mean and Ronald is not. Therefore, being fat makes people mean."

      --
      "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session." -- Judge Gideon J. Tucker
  7. Re:Bitcoin for retards by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 2

    Funny. A bunch of US dollars in one hand versus a bitcoin wallet address in the other - guess which one is earning me more right now? And no, financial instruments and investments are not USD.

    --

    Long signatures suck.
  8. Re:Good representation of bitcoin users by mark-t · · Score: 2

    I didn't know that going directly to jail for tax evasion was actually a thing anymore. I thought that what they did now was they would assume it was an error, and notify the person, providing them with an opportunity to correct it by paying the amount owed (with interest, of course). I would imagine that one would only actually go to jail if they could be found to be deliberately avoiding paying the amount that they supposed to owe. This should require going to court first and so one wouldn't really go directly to jail, not to mention also getting lots of notice.

  9. Re:Scary by Kiuas · · Score: 5, Informative

    The IRS scares me. They will stop at nothing to get every last penny in taxes owed by everyone.

    It scares you that officials seek to do their job effectively? What?

    That's what tax officials do. They collect taxes that people owe. Some people, especially wealthier people and large corporations seek to use different mechanisms to avoid paying taxes that they legally owe. If tax officials allow this to happen, they're basically saying that tax evasion is fine at which point everyone with the money to hire a tax advisor/set up a shell company will stop paying taxes, and the entire tax burden will be left on those too poor to be able to use trickery to dodge taxes, which would be destructive to the entire society. There are those who argue this is in fact already at least partially the case seeing how little taxes many megacorporations pay to their respective countries, and seeing how abundant different sorts of tax-havens like Panama and the Caymans are.

    Unless you yourself happen to be trying to use Bitcoin to dodge taxes, you should be in favor of this, because the more sucessfully people avoid taxes, the more the pool of tax paying citizens shrinks because tax-evasion, the more taxes you will pay.

    Their basically tax-Nazis.

    No. Wanting to catch people who break laws does not make anyone a nazi. This is just as stupid as calling the police "the crime-Nazis" for wanting to apprehend criminals. Now you may disagree with certain laws and argue that said laws or said taxes should not be collected, but for that to happen you need to change the law, not point the finger the whoever is enforcing said law and break Godwin's law without clearly having even a modicum of understanding of what the word you're throwing as an insult means.

    --
    "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
  10. Re:Better explanation by PPH · · Score: 2

    Came to post something like this.

    Anonymous currencies (which Bitcoin really isn't) and currencies not controlled by central banks (which Bitcoin is) are quite useful under authoritarian and/or despotic governments.

    I expect Bitcion use to increase significantly in the USA over the next few years.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  11. Re: ELIMINATE MODERATION by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    There is no reason to allow someone to moderate in a discussion and then post anonymously. That's a bug - one that can be easily fixed. It's also dishonest. Then again, most logged-in users hide behind nyms anyway, so they're more like "semi-anonymous cowards."

    Now back on topic. The bitcoin chain holds a record of every transaction. The IRS shouldn't have too hard a time now going back over years of transaction records. There's the flaw of bitcoin - if anonymity is broken, every transaction is on record, not just the most recent activity. And for bitcoin to work, every transaction needs to be recorded. And if history has taught us anything, it's that any encryption can be broken given enough resources and motivation. Just more proof that those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it, I guess.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.