Slashdot Mirror


A User Archived Nearly 2 Million Gigabytes of Porn to Test Amazon's 'Unlimited' Cloud Storage (vice.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Reddit user beaston02 was determined to find the true ceiling of Amazon's cloud storage plan, which was killed off in June. He decided to push its limits with a petabyte of porn. For reference, a petabyte is one million gigabytes. "It is nearly entirely porn," he told me in a Reddit message. "Ever since I got into computers, I found myself learning more, and faster when it was something more interesting. Call me crazy, but women interest me more than most other things on the internet and there is a huge amount of data being created daily, so it was a good fit for the project." He said it took five or six months to collect one petabyte of porn, and he stopped collecting just shy of 1.8 petabytes. How long would it take one to consume 1.8 petabytes of porn? 1.8 petabytes is about 23.4 years of HD-TV video, but webcam streams are nowhere near that quality. A few good folks crunched the numbers: 720p is about two gigabytes per hour, and at 900,000 hours, that's 102 years of straight calendar time. If the videos are even lower quality, say, 480p, that's around 0.7 gigabytes per hour, or 293 years and six months.

4 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I don't get it by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's so much porn you can't even possibly look at most of it.

    And your excuse for saving years of old emails you'll never read again is what exactly?

    If you wanted to test Amazon's "unlimited' storage, why not just randomly generate various files. You could probably have a computer make shitty modern art paintings much faster than you could curate a 1 petabyte porn collection, and you still get to test out how much you can store on Amazon's cloud storage service before they pull the plug. And when they invariably do, you won't lose your porn collection.

    Hrm...random worthless bullshit vs. porn. No surprise which was deemed more entertaining. There's a reason porn has always been a predominant force online.

  2. Re:Porn is unwatchable. by baker_tony · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only disgusting whores do it. They are not sexy in any way, in the vast majority of cases. Only disgusting. The females you would *want* to see naked never would do such things (in public).

    Dude, we get it, only gay male porn for you!

  3. Re:2 million gigabytes of porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's jackasses like this that ruin "unlimited" for the rest of us.

  4. Re:2 million gigabytes of porn by queazocotal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Almost certainly without permission of the girls involved, and violating the T&Cs of the sites in question.