Slashdot Mirror


On Internet Privacy, Be Very Afraid (harvard.edu)

Cybersecurity expert and Berkman Klein fellow Bruce Schneier talked to the Gazette about what consumers can do to protect themselves from government and corporate surveillance. From the interview: GAZETTE: After whistleblower Edward Snowden's revelations concerning the National Security Agency's (NSA) mass surveillance operation in 2013, how much has the government landscape in this field changed?
SCHNEIER: Snowden's revelations made people aware of what was happening, but little changed as a result. The USA Freedom Act resulted in some minor changes in one particular government data-collection program. The NSA's data collection hasn't changed; the laws limiting what the NSA can do haven't changed; the technology that permits them to do it hasn't changed. It's pretty much the same.
GAZETTE: Should consumers be alarmed by this?
SCHNEIER: People should be alarmed, both as consumers and as citizens. But today, what we care about is very dependent on what is in the news at the moment, and right now surveillance is not in the news. It was not an issue in the 2016 election, and by and large isn't something that legislators are willing to make a stand on. Snowden told his story, Congress passed a new law in response, and people moved on.
GAZETTE: What about corporate surveillance? How pervasive is it?
SCHNEIER: Surveillance is the business model of the internet. Everyone is under constant surveillance by many companies, ranging from social networks like Facebook to cellphone providers. This data is collected, compiled, analyzed, and used to try to sell us stuff. Personalized advertising is how these companies make money, and is why so much of the internet is free to users. We're the product, not the customer.

12 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. Im glad I never started using the Internet by ZippyTheChicken · · Score: 5, Funny

    dam thing is just a horror story

  2. Nobody cares by DogDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People willingly give up all of their privacy millions of times a day for no good reason at all. The vast, vast majority of people don't give a shit about privacy.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Nobody cares by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Totally agree with this. A lot of people around are all exited when they get targeted ads. I get f**king upset, but I seem to be the only one.

    2. Re:Nobody cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If they don't understand how it's impacting their lives then it must not be impacting them very much, don't you think?

      Online privacy is a concern, but really in our society it's sort of a luxury concern. People that have most of their other worries solved start worrying about their privacy. If you're worried about being thrown out of your apartment because you can't pay the rent or being pulled over and given a ticket you can't pay because you can't afford to fix your car's broken turn signal, then Internet privacy probably won't make your list of things to think about.

  3. Re: Why do they think I'm a middle aged lesbian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Based on your search terms I imagine. We all have fetishes don't worry.

  4. No fear here by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

    I live in Canada, and all our documents are encoded in UTF-EH, making them incompatible with other systems on the planet.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  5. Re:Mesmerizing by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where has all the aluminum foil hat folks gone?

    They're all gone. The problem is, when you walk around with an aluminium foil hat all the time and you happen to have half a sandwich to store in the fridge for later, you just grab your hat and... then it's too late.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  6. Why do you presume status quo? by HBI · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you think a totalitarian government that will use the data provided by these vendors as a means of culling the population as an impossible thing?

    You're ignoring the last 200 years of history, then. Imagine what 19th century monarchs or 20th century totalitarians might have done with such a treasure trove.

    Do you really think it will never happen again? Think again.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  7. Re:Afraid? Alarmed? by jodido · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Very naive idea that only the guilty have something to fear. The cops don't care if you're "innocent" or "guilty"--witness the vast numbers of people in jail right now who are not guilty. They care about arrests and convictions and along with the prosecutors will use whatever means they have at their disposal to get a conviction on whoever they decide fits their idea of who's guilty.

  8. Re:Afraid? Alarmed? by dromgodis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only thing to be afraid of or alarmed over is the possibility of getting caught doing something illegal, unethical, or otherwise with negative consequences if people find out you're doing it.

    What's legal, ethical and acceptable today may not be after the next election or revolution.

  9. In Soviet Russia ... by PPH · · Score: 2

    ... Internet uses YOU!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  10. Re:Afraid? Alarmed? by erapert · · Score: 2

    I didn't speak out when they came for the Jews because I wasn't a Jew so I had nothing to hide...
    I didn't speak out when they started censoring all information about Tianamen Square because I wasn't Chinese...
    I didn't speak out when political dissidents were being doxed, harrassed, bullied, fired, fined, imprisoned and even executed because I wasn't a dissident or I didn't live in Thailand etc. ...
    I didn't speak out because I never expected such things to happen here in the glorious utopia of the West where we're all so far above all that petty nonsense because we're such perfect ubermensch and our politicians are sublimely moral...