Slashdot Mirror
Google Conducted Hollywood 'Interventions' To Change Look of Computer Scientists (usatoday.com)
theodp writes: Most TV computer scientists are still white men," USA Today reports. "Google wants to change that. Google is calling on Hollywood to give equal screen time to women and minorities after a new study the internet giant funded found that most computer scientists on television shows and in the movies are played by white men. The problem with the hackneyed stereotype of the socially inept, hoodie-clad white male coder? It does not inspire underrepresented groups to pursue careers in computer science, says Daraiha Greene, Google CS in Media program manager, multicultural strategy." According to a Google-funded study conducted by Prof. Stacy L. Smith and the Media, Diversity, & Social Change Initiative at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, Google's Computer Science in Media team conducted "CS interventions" with "like-minded people" to create "Google influenced storytelling." The executive summary for a USC study entitled Cracking the Code: The Prevalence and Nature of Computer Science Depictions in Media notes that "Google influenced" TV programs include HBO's Silicon Valley and AMC's Halt and Catch Fire. The USC researchers also note that "non-tech focused programs may offer prime opportunities to showcase CS in unique and counter-stereotypical ways. As the Google Team moves forward in its work with series such as Empire, Girl Meets World, Gortimer Gibbons Life on Normal Street, or The Amazing Adventures of Gumball, it appears the Team is seizing these opportunities to integrate CS into storytelling without a primary tech focus." The study adds, "In the case of certain series, we provided on-going advisement. The Fosters, Miles from Tomorrowland, Halt and Catch Fire, Ready, Jet, Go, The Powerpuff Girls and Odd Squad are examples of this. In addition to our continuing interactions, we engaged in extensive PR and marketing support including social media outreach, events and press."
Google's TV interventions have even spilled over into public education -- one of Google-sponsored Code.org's signature Hour of Code tutorials last December was Gumball's Coding Adventure, inspired by the Google-advised Cartoon Network series, The Amazing Adventures of Gumball. "We need more students around the world pursuing an education in CS, particularly girls and minorities, who have historically been underrepresented in the field," explains a Google CS First presentation for educators on the search giant's Hour of Code partnership with Cartoon Network. "Based on our research, one of the reasons girls and underrepresented minorities are not pursuing computer science is because of the negative perception of computer scientists and the relevance of the field beyond coding." According to a 2015 USC report, President Obama was kept abreast of efforts to challenge media's stereotypical portrayals of women; White House Visitor Records show that USC's Smith, the Google-funded study's lead author, and Google CS Education in Media Program Manager Julie Ann Crommett (now at Disney) were among those present when the White House Council on Women and Girls met earlier that year with representatives of the nation's leading toy makers, media giants, retailers, educators, scientists, the U.S. Dept. of Education, and philanthropists.
Google's TV interventions have even spilled over into public education -- one of Google-sponsored Code.org's signature Hour of Code tutorials last December was Gumball's Coding Adventure, inspired by the Google-advised Cartoon Network series, The Amazing Adventures of Gumball. "We need more students around the world pursuing an education in CS, particularly girls and minorities, who have historically been underrepresented in the field," explains a Google CS First presentation for educators on the search giant's Hour of Code partnership with Cartoon Network. "Based on our research, one of the reasons girls and underrepresented minorities are not pursuing computer science is because of the negative perception of computer scientists and the relevance of the field beyond coding." According to a 2015 USC report, President Obama was kept abreast of efforts to challenge media's stereotypical portrayals of women; White House Visitor Records show that USC's Smith, the Google-funded study's lead author, and Google CS Education in Media Program Manager Julie Ann Crommett (now at Disney) were among those present when the White House Council on Women and Girls met earlier that year with representatives of the nation's leading toy makers, media giants, retailers, educators, scientists, the U.S. Dept. of Education, and philanthropists.
At least make it consistent with reality
The whole purpose of this is NOT to be consistent with reality, and NOT show things as they really are. The goal is to create an illusionist Utopia la-la land where everyone rides winged unicorns, where minorities ARE the majority, all races just absolutely love each other, Muslim terrorists drop the van keys and mount flowers on their machetes and swords, etc.
Hmmm . . . so they call this practice "Intervention" . . . I'd call it censorship++. This is stuff the former East German Stasi Secret Police used to do with televisions programs there. The scripts were inspected and "re-written be conform with Socialist Ideology.
TV shows that are reality-space-time-Schrödinger's-Cat-In-Your-Laptop-warped crazy propaganda tend to be unintentionally funny.
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
I saw a video a few weeks back that made a lot of sense: women are more risk averse than men.
So the solution is for Google to stop going after the best of the best. Cut everyone's salary by 10, and hire 10 times more people with no expectations that any of them will be more than middling. Rather than keep all the jobs in high risk high reward silicon valley, set up low cost work sites in every major city, McDonald's style.
So, what have we accomplished here?
1. You don't need to risk moving to California.
2. You don't need to risk getting a degree you might not like.
3. You don't need to risk applying for a top job where you have to take all sorts of crazy tests to prove you're the best of the best of the best.
You have a career at Google as a normal, boring, low risk low reward career. You can apply for it out of high school and have a good chance of getting one of the many Google jobs in every city.
How far is Google willing to get more women in tech? Are they willing to do this?
Seems like it. Google used to at least try to follow "Do no evil" but seems to have completely thrown that away in the last year.
Sure, I'll give you four examples. One of my former co-workers is a case in point. I had warned him 10 years ago that if he didn't change, he'd be a 40 year old virgin. He didn't change, and now he is. He exemplifies the type of guy who couldn't get laid if he walked into a women's prison with a stack of pardons. Oh yes, I almost forgot - he still lives with his mom, always has, and will until the day she dies.
I also know a few guys outside IT whose entire life outside work is gaming. One is in his 30s, he actually had a girlfriend a few years ago - but she got sick and tired of coming in second to video games. Lives in mom's basement. Another one is a former friend of a relative, who spends all day gaming, He's in his mid-40s, doesn't work, doesn't want to work, says "why should I when welfare pays for a roof over my head and an internet connection?" Games allow him to ignore his failure to grow the f*ck up. And let's face it, after a few decades not working, he's unemployable. And he's doomed to staying single.
None of them is grounded in the real world. They may fantasize about getting a girlfriend, but it's going to remain just fantasies. They're totally secluded from any opportunities to interact with people in real life (maybe they think that their Facebook friends are "real friends").
And now I'll reach back in time to show that this is not new. Back in the DOS days there was a guy who would show up at the restaurant once in a while for breakfast. His total life was devoted to developing a "universal printer driver" for DOS. Year after year. Didn't give up even when Windows came to the fore. By that time, he was so psychologically invested in getting rich off his program and then enjoying all the benefits of same that even when Windows 3.1 was replaced by Windows 95, he kept plugging away. Oh - almost forgot - it was written in BASIC.
Contrary to your assertion, I don't hate men. You can ask any of the guys I have supper with once or twice a week. Some I work with, others are friends, or friends of friends. There's one who shows up sporadically and ends up with his nose buried in his phone playing games from the moment he sits down pretty much to when he gets up to leave. Another example of someone using games to self-isolate, to live in their own safe bubble.
And I'm sure there are women who are just as bad. Addicted to Facebook or Twitter or Candy Crush or whatever. It really pisses me off when I visit other women for a get together and they ALL have their faces buried in their phones or tablets (and so do their kids). And the topic of conversation? Who's posted what ... After a while, I just quietly leave. I know when I'm beat.
One of my sisters has the perfect solution. When everyone meets up at a restaurant, the first one to look at their phone pays everyone's lunch.
There are plenty of people who are now isolating themselves because it's easier than ever. Today, if you so choose, you can be alone even in a city of millions. Many of these people either no longer have the necessary social skills for actual interaction, or increasingly they never learned them.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
Do you really fail to understand the difference between "cliche" and "entertainment"?
I care about character development, storyline and the universe inside which the movie is built, rather than how actors look like or the percentage of *this* or *that* skin color in the movie.
In fact, there is a reason for stereotypes. That's to not distract viewers from what the filmmakers really want to show in their movie.
For example the scenario calls for some computer stuff, so they need a computer guy. The computer guy is that not important to the story, and his race and gender even less so. So what they do is tap in the expectations of the public : a computer guy should be a nerdy white male. If they diverge from the stereotype, people will notice that and the character will draw attention, but it is not what they want, they don't want you to think "hey, a black girl is playing the hacker, interesting", when that hacker is totally secondary to the story.
What made me realize that is the comment of a sound director about dubbing screeching tires sounds for a car driving on gravel. He said that, yes, he knows it is wrong, but it is a short scene, and most people probably don't even notice the gravel. So as the car accelerates, if it makes the proper sound, spectators will think "what is this sound? oh yes, gravel" for a second, and this is not what you want from a breathtaking action scene. He also said that he has to adapt. It it is clearly shown that the car is on gravel, that the gravel is important or that spectators become too knowledgeable of this particular trope, he will use the correct sound because doing otherwise would be the distraction.