Slashdot Mirror


At Burning Man While Your Startup Burns (techcrunch.com)

There's a difference between clearing your head, and ditching your dying startup to do drugs in the desert. From a report: Whether you're going to Burning Man, Ibiza, SXSW, or some big international tech conference, the message you send is the same. If your startup isn't succeeding, you're skipping out on the dirty work while hoping some miracle revelation or networking connection will save you. And it probably won't. For those less familiar, Burning Man is when 70,000 people build a temporary city of tents and RVs in the Nevada desert where no money is exchanged, and instead everyone seeks to gift strangers with giant art installations, workshops, food, drinks, and celebrations. But I get a sinking feeling when I notice or hear about the leaders of a struggling startup trying to dance or dose away their troubles. Being out of a contact for several days to a week since there's no reliable cellular connection and a stigma against phone use creates a decision-making bottleneck that can slow down your company. Ex-Oculus founder Palmer Luckey here points out how juice presser startup Juicero's founder Doug Evans took off to Burning Man for week. That's despite the company recently admitting it needed to lower prices after Bloomberg reporters revealed you could simply squeeze Juicero juice packs by hand without the $400 machine. In the middle of that week Evans was at Burning Man, Juicero announced it would suspend sales of its juicer and juice packs as it desperately tries to find an acquirer. While Evans handed over the CEO title to former Coca-Cola exec Jeff Dunn late last year, the company told TechCrunch "Evans is Juicero's full time Founder and Chairman of the Board and very active within the company."

12 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Work 24/7! by kamapuaa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shouldn't people be allowed to take vacations? I have no problem with this.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:Work 24/7! by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      CEOs shouldn't vacation while their company is failing.

      On the other hand, when your company is essentially running a scam that has been uncovered, I don't think there's much for a CEO to do except get the hell out ASAP with as much money as they can extract.

      I think if you're watching your scam's easy money dry up, you might want to get stoned in the desert for a while to avoid thinking about the sudden and likely long-term drop in standard of living you're going to have in the future.

    2. Re:Work 24/7! by AlanObject · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Shouldn't people be allowed to take vacations? I have no problem with this.

      Yes people should be allowed to take vacations. Not under all circumstances.

      When you are an entrepreneur and you take money from an investor you are not just like any other employee of the company. You are getting a deal other employees don't get. You get a bigger payout in return for a bigger commitment.

      As an investor I would say: if you are hitting the planned milestones (i.e. investor return) then do whatever you want. If you are not generating a return or not hitting the milestones then you do nothing except those activities that will increase the likelihood of getting a return. Traipsing of to BM for a week does not count and is in fact the opposite. Think about how that looks to any potential buyer.

      An entrepreneur has to have many qualifications but a sense of entitlement is not one of them.

    3. Re: Work 24/7! by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a wee bit of difference between getting drunk for an evening and a week of vacation with no phone coverage at all, in the days most crucial for the company's survival (in this case, getting bought out so they can continue to scam).

      It's like a sysape going on a trip right after your company's servers got broken into and wiped, while machines meant for backup are sitting in a closet not even been set up despite having been purchased a year ago.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:Work 24/7! by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I never claimed authority over him, just the right of armchair quarterbacking.

      If you're responsible for making a business work and you walk away while it is floundering, that's not really fulfilling your responsibilities. Whether that's fine with the stakeholders or not for some reason doesn't make it optimal.

      That's not class envy.

    5. Re:Work 24/7! by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If we went by 'none of your business' there would be nothing to talk about on this site at all. Since you're here, that can't be your standard and I'm forced to conclude you're simply being an ass.

  2. Re:And burning yourself out is useless by pubwvj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "success is 10% sweat, 30% connection, and 60% luck."

    That attitude explains why a lot of people fail and then bemoan failing but won't take ownership of their own failure.

    My success is 80% sweat, 1% connection and 19% luck.

    Luck comes in two varieties: good and bad. You need to be prepared to take advantage of the good luck and resilient enough to keep pushing through the bad luck.

    Stop thinking that other people are succeeding because of their connections and luck. Your attitude is just excuse making. Start putting in the sweat to make things happen and stick with it. Good things take a lot of time and work.

  3. Re:Don't These Hipsters Know Burning Man is Over? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dude, it's Burning Man! You are paying someone to sit in the desert, discard your gadgets, and feel good about yourself! Not since Tom Sawyer tricked half his town into white-washing his fence for him has there been a bigger scam than Burning Man 2017!

  4. Indispensable is bad by JohnFen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A fundamental rule about businesses is: you should never have anyone who is actually indispensable. If that person gets hit by a bus, the business is toast -- so a company with one of more indispensable people in it is a company in a weak or precarious position.

    If the company really can't do without an exec for a week or so, I take that as a big red flag that the company is, at best, teetering. So let them have their vacation, it's probably not making anything worse.

  5. unreasonable expectations by Goldsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a startup founder, I've never been to Burning Man, or any similar events, and probably never will be. I agree that those are not actually networking events, but I don't think it's ok to dictate the type of vacation someone should take. If raving in the desert is what someone needs to clear their head and make better decisions, they should do it. Not everyone gets the same thing from meditation and solitary introspection. Sometimes you just need something different. There are times I need to go take a peaceful hike by myself to reflect, and there are times I need to go to Vegas with an old friend to make bad decisions on purpose.

    For a startup founder, your company is ALWAYS in crisis. Every week you're burning cash to keep things going. If you wait for the perfect time to take a vacation, you'll be waiting for a very long time. Whether you can bear to leave your co-workers working while you go is highly personal and unique to every situation... it's impossible to generalize.

    Now, I've seen people who do take way too much time off, and do expect to come up with a miracle on the fly to replace the work they should have put in. But that's a different thing.

  6. Re:And burning yourself out is useless by JohnFen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My success is 80% sweat, 1% connection and 19% luck.

    While I agree with this, I'd like to make two observations:

    First, the difference between someone who succeeds and someone who fails is that the one who succeeds doesn't give up after each failure. I've known quite a lot of very successful people, but I've never met a single one who hasn't left a string of failures behind them on the way.

    Second, what people call "luck" isn't. One thing that stands out to me about people who are "lucky" is that they have a skill that can be somewhat subtle. All of us are surrounded by opportunities of all sorts, every day. We don't notice or recognize the majority of them (and, truthfully, most of them aren't of interest to us).

    People who are "lucky" are people who are better at noticing these opportunities and taking advantage of them.

  7. Re:Who cares? (Those who invested in shit, fuck'em by HeckRuler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He has a ... net worth of a couple of million

    HE'S WON BABY!

    With a $2 million dollars of stocks you can have an income of (around and averaged to) $200,000/year from stock market gains alone. You can live anywhere in the world and that money still comes in. You don't have to put in a single hour of work. It just happens.

    Considering the typical person in the world lives on ~$10,000/year and you'd be making 20x that, for doing nothing other than breathing, I think you've got a VERY strange definition of "paltry". Hell, even in first-world top-dog USA where everyone is rich and the median income is $51,939, you'd still be doing REAL fine just living on the gains from your stocks.

    Let me make this abundantly clear: Most people still have to work for a living because they cannot simply choose to get out of the SanFran housing clusterfuck and retire with a big-ass pile of a "paltry" $2,000,000. If I were handed even $1 mil, I'd stop working for someone else and start making the things I WANT to make (or fuck around all day like the unmotivated slob I am, but regardless). If you think having a net worth of $2 mil makes this guy a loser, then you need to go travel the world a little. The parts which don't have a cabana boy with mimosas on hand. You need some perspective. It'll do you good.