Slashdot Mirror


Are We Being Watched? Tens of Other Worlds Could Spot the Earth (eurekalert.org)

A group of scientists from Queen's University Belfast and the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Germany have turned exoplanet-hunting on its head, in a study that instead looks at how an alien observer might be able to detect Earth using our own methods. From a report: They find that at least nine exoplanets are ideally placed to observe transits of Earth, in a new work published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Thanks to facilities and missions such as SuperWASP and Kepler, we have now discovered thousands of planets orbiting stars other than our Sun, worlds known as 'exoplanets.' The vast majority of these are found when the planets cross in front of their host stars in what are known as 'transits,' which allow astronomers to see light from the host star dim slightly at regular intervals every time the planet passes between us and the distant star. In the new study, the authors reverse this concept and ask, "How would an alien observer see the Solar System?" They identified parts of the distant sky from where various planets in our Solar System could be seen to pass in front of the Sun - so-called 'transit zones' -- concluding that the terrestrial planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars) are actually much more likely to be spotted than the more distant 'Jovian' planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune), despite their much larger size. To look for worlds where civilisations would have the best chance of spotting our Solar System, the astronomers looked for parts of the sky from which more than one planet could be seen crossing the face of the Sun. They found that three planets at most could be observed from anywhere outside of the Solar System, and that not all combinations of three planets are possible.

94 comments

  1. No... by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, but our ancestors might be.

    1. Re:No... by infolation · · Score: 1, Informative

      The aliens would see our earth at the same time we see their exoplanet.

      By the time the light from the alien planet has reached our Earth to let us determine it's habitable, the light from our earth has reached them.

    2. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame that it will be our descendants that pay the price for our ancestors' exhibitionism.

    3. Re: No... by Type44Q · · Score: 4, Funny

      And the light doesn't even make a "whoosh" sound...

    4. Re:No... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      ...what?

      GP's point is that the light reaching them now doesn't allow them to see us as we are now, but as were x years ago where x is also the distance in light-years to the planet..

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hope

    6. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame that aluminum hats don't work. Aluminium hats work great however.

    7. Re:No... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "No, but our ancestors might be."

      1. They are watching 'I love Lucy right now
      2. I find 'ancestor' offensive, you young whippersnapper

    8. Re:No... by nukenerd · · Score: 3, Informative

      TFA does not mention which exoplanets, but they will need to be relatively close to detect our transits. By "relatively close" we would be talking 10-20 light years - so us, not our ancestors (apart from the kids here).

      Anyway they would not need to look for transits when we are blasting radar beams and TV broadcasts in all directions, the latter of which which might be shit but nevertheless has strong self-correlation, such as we ourselves look for in the SETI project.

    9. Re:No... by dpilot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The first thing that will make Earth interesting is our Goldilocks position around our sun.

      The second thing that will make Earth interesting is our atmosphere. We have an "interesting" atmosphere.

      Both of those bits of information have been out there for a long time - longer than we've existed.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    10. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jokes on you!
      They have telescopes powered by tachyons.
      They are currently watching Ra having his ass handed to him by SG-1 in Egypt.
      Who knew they'd like Stargate re-runs?

    11. Re:No... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      No, but our ancestors might be.

      You're not wrong. Based on the paper the closest planet we know of capable of observing the earth is 470ly away.

      HATS-11 b = 2954ly
      1RXS 1609 b = 470ly
      LKCA 15 b = 470ly
      WASP-47 b,c,d,e = 652ly
      WD 1145+017 b = 520ly

    12. Re:No... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

      Anyway they would not need to look for transits when we are blasting radar beams and TV broadcasts in all directions, the latter of which which might be shit but nevertheless has strong self-correlation, such as we ourselves look for in the SETI project.

      With the distance and dispersion they'd still have to have an helluva big antenna pointing in our direction. So much so that AFAIK we're assuming they have better technology than we have, we couldn't pick up a TV broadcast from an alien world. If we point a radio telescope at them and "ping" them they'd get the message with current technology - assuming the antenna is pointing in the right direction, but that's quite different from an accidental pick-up of a signal intended for Earth.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >The second thing that will make Earth interesting is our atmosphere. We have an "interesting" atmosphere.

      Say the carbon-based life form that likes oxygen.

    14. Re:No... by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      With the distance and dispersion they'd still have to have an helluva big antenna pointing in our direction .... we couldn't pick up a TV broadcast from an alien world. If we point a radio telescope at them and "ping" them they'd get the message with current technology - assuming the antenna is pointing in the right direction, but that's quite different from an accidental pick-up of a signal intended for Earth.

      You should tell the SETI project to stop wasting their time then.

    15. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's questionable how meaningful the Goldilocks zone is. It's part subjective and part linked to our understanding of chemistry. I think our position and size will be more easily determined but it's our atmosphere which is very unlikely to come about via natural processes that would signal the presence of life (unique chemistry). Primarily this would be down to the presence of free oxygen. There is a question of how detectable this is remotely. Even aliens with no oxygen cycle would from knowledge of basic chemistry flag a planet such as ours as extremely peculiar.

      That is unless photosynthesis is in fact common in the galaxy but not complex life. Complex life on Earth likely would not have emerged as easily without the right abundance of other chemicals, a moon stirring things up (helping with sea to land transition as well), the right weather patterns (good amounts of rain), the right balance of meteors and catastrophes (too many is bad, but so is not enough), plate tectonics, etc. On top of that you have all of the chance mutations needed.

      Kepler should determine this if I understand right that it's looking at the composition of atmospheres. However is it capable of detecting free oxygen in abundance easily and is it looking for that?

    16. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oxygen isn't stable, it reacts with things. So to maintain free oxygen in the atmosphere it requires some method to replenish it. If we saw a planet with oxygen in its atmosphere there isn't really any other explanation I'm aware of than life. Even non-oxygen breathing species will realize that an excess of oxygen is strange and interesting.

      Further, the pollution in our atmosphere is a dead giveaway of intelligent life.

    17. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not looking for TV signals, dipshit.

  2. Completely looking in the wrong place by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1, Funny

    The majority of life has two suns not one.

    Our solar system is the anomaly.

    The fallacy is thinking that our system is the standard. It isn't -- it is the exception -- we need to stop pretending the human perspective is the only one that matters, or is even right.

    --
    Atheist, noun, a blind man arguing with the rest of the world that color doesn't exist.

    1. Re:Completely looking in the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of life has two suns not one.

      Speaking of fallacy, what type of "life" are you referring to?

    2. Re: Completely looking in the wrong place by Type44Q · · Score: 2

      The majority of life has two suns not one.

      Probably but it's not impossible that, for whatever reason, life might have a better chance of arising in a single-star system.

      Don't phrase assumptions as facts.

    3. Re:Completely looking in the wrong place by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The majority of life has two suns not one.

      The majority of stars are in binary systems, but this does not necessarily mean that the majority of life will be found in such systems.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Completely looking in the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jediism

    5. Re:Completely looking in the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the subject line and comment to the signature, this person is a full blown troll. Do not feed.

    6. Re:Completely looking in the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Jediism

      I'd prefer Elly May myself.

    7. Re:Completely looking in the wrong place by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2

      The majority of stars are in binary systems, but this does not necessarily mean that the majority of life will be found in such systems.

      No, but that's the way you'd bet.

    8. Re: Completely looking in the wrong place by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      Probably but it's not impossible that, for whatever reason, life might have a better chance of arising in a single-star system.

      Life is highly unlikely to arise on a planet around a double star unless the two stars were very close together. The temperature variations as the planet orbited them would be tremendous, that is if the orbit were stable at all.

    9. Re:Completely looking in the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naively, maybe. But until we know whether a binary system is more hostile to life or not it would be tough to say. I recall that stable planetary orbits around binary systems are predicted to be more difficult. There will be more three-body interactions which could lead to the ejection of the planets.

      One scenario with stable orbits would be where the two stars orbit closely to each other while the planet is a significant distance further out, since too close to the binaries the orbits wouldn't necessarily be stable. You could also have stable planetary orbits with binaries where the stars are sufficiently far apart and the planet orbits just one of the stars.

      IIRC, this AstronomyCast episode covers this subject well.

  3. Contact by petes_PoV · · Score: 2
    So why haven't these other worlds contacted us?

    Is it because they do not support life?
    That their live is not advanced enough?
    That they are trying to contact us, but we cannot detect their message.
    That it is a quality of advanced civilisations that they ignore each other (or defer contact until some defined "level" of civilisation has been reached).
    or are they on their way, right now.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:Contact by Gilgaron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How often do you try to contact the ants that live in your neighbor's back yard? How often do they try to contact you?

    2. Re:Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the camelot scene in Holy Grail?

    3. Re:Contact by Myrdos · · Score: 5, Funny

      How often do they try to contact you?

      Every day.

    4. Re: Contact by Type44Q · · Score: 3, Funny

      So why haven't these other worlds contacted us?

      Turn on your TV: Would you want to contact any of those motherfuckers?!

    5. Re:Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, seriously. Well, I don't know about my neighbors back yard, but I try to contact the ants in my back yard once a month through a visit from Clark pest control services, my message? Stop trying to come into my house to contact me.

    6. Re:Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its only a model...

    7. Re:Contact by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So why haven't these other worlds contacted us?

      Because the computers have taken over, and they're waiting for our computers. They don't want to talk to the meat.

    8. Re:Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth! I have trouble understanding but I think it has something to do with wanting my cookie crumb resources.

    9. Re:Contact by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      So why haven't these other worlds contacted us?

      Give them a chance. Maybe 40 years ago they received our first strong radio broadcasts signals from 80 years ago, and their replies should get here real soon now. Bear in mind the first thing they heard might have been one of Hitler's speeches.

    10. Re:Contact by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      I try to contact the ants in my back yard once a month through a visit from Clark pest control services

      A Klingon pest control officer is on his way here now.

    11. Re:Contact by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      How often do you try to contact the ants that live in your neighbor's back yard?

      I never even try to contact the fucking neighbour, let alone his ants.

    12. Re:Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the important questions.
      There could be a hundred species out there all watching, but they are also likely smart enough to be going, "yeah, naw, fuck that noise" and throw up a huge metal frame around their planet / star system as soon as they can to capture all EM.

      We'll be able to reach that point in the next 300~ years at the current speed we are going.
      There's already several different groups heavily funding space mining missions right now, including several governments and billionaires.
      The growth after we get the primary space mining systems up and running will explode exponentially because of automation doing the primary scout and capture.
      Anyone that can see us will just assume our solar system went "kapoop" and vanished in some weird unknown astronomical event so give up caring to watch us unless they create a planetary sized telescope eventually.
      If they have done that already, they'll probably not even care much, unless they are Klingon-tier, in which case they will royally shit on us in however many years it might take them to come visit us. After all, what mysterious thing do we have to hide that leads us to covering out an entire planet / star system? The jealous kid syndrome will take over and they will WANT TO KNOW.

    13. Re:Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why haven't these other worlds contacted us. are you for real, lol

      The evidence is everywhere and most people just wont believe even if they got hit up the face with it!

      The Ariel School UFO
      O'Hare airport UFO
      Westall UFO

      I could go on and on.

      Let me tell you what I seen 6 inches from my window 12 feet from me.

      This happened in Newtownards Northern Ireland around 20 years ago and I have told very few people about this so listen up.

      I was in bed with my wife it was around 7:30 am and I woke later than usual as I had the day off work.

      I woke and looked out the window to see what kind of day it was, it was a stunning day, sun no clouds and blue sky's, I didn't notice anything in the sky at this time, my wife was sleeping, I thought I'll let her sleep a bit and I lay there just thinking and planning my day off.

      I lay for around 30mins, I thought to myself I'll have a smoke and then wake her, I was looking at her and as I turned to reaching for my cigarettes on the left side of the bed I noticed something in the sky around 5-600 meters out above her, the window was on my right and was uncovered as it wasn't over looked, I paid it no notice and continued reaching for the cigarettes, I roll my own and lay there rolling one, I still hadn't looked out at what I saw but I was thinking about it,

      It was just a black dot, I turn and looked at it, it was as if I had startled it, it shot off and left my view due to the window. That was strange I thought to myself as I was still thinking about what it was, I lit my cig and as I did an orange(some would say yellow) orb slid in from the left side of the window and just set there 6" from the glass.

      As It slid in I thought to myself, this things moving in slow to not scare me(not sure this was me thinking this though) anyway it didn't but I was very aware of it, I can also remember feeling embarrassed about the cigarette and let it drop into the ash tray that was on my lap.

      It was an orb around 3 feet wide and was a uniform very light orange with a very light glow. Around the equator there was a fluid plasma type stuff flowing around in opposite directions, this was grey to black depending on the density and moving very slow (1-2 inches a second) there was no sound, I seen no windows doors or anything. as the only thing that stood out was the plasma that's what I was looking at. This stuff seemed to have a mind of its own, as I watched it fingers would come of it and move away from the flow and then claps back to the main flow, two of these fingers didn't though and started to move as if they would touch (I though to myself they're going to touch but I don't think it was me thinking it) it seem to make me watch and as I watched I felt myself (my mind) being pulled into it and had to force myself to stop.

      I was calling my wife's name to wake her but she wouldn't wake, I had to elbow her to get her to wake and as she did the UFO shot back to the left of the window and was gone.

      Thinking about it later (years later) I believe this UFO was watching me and when I turned and look at it, it wanted to know how I new it was there and was using the plasma to find out if I was developing some sort of e.s.p

    14. Re:Contact by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      So why haven't these other worlds contacted us?

      Who says they haven't? The closest of them listed was over 400 light years away, so obviously they wouldn't have responded to any signals from us yet if we'd sent any strong enough which we haven't. They might well have sent numerous signals to us for millions or even billions of years and never gotten a response, finally giving up.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    15. Re: Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, after 16 years, I can't even be bothered to make an account here.

    16. Re:Contact by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Or we may be the most advanced civilization in our galactic neighborhood, and we are closer to being able to detect them than the other way around.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    17. Re:Contact by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      If there were a new species of ants in your neighbors back yard, I am sure that you and a lot more people would be contacting them. Humans would be a new species to any advanced alien race so I also sure they would want to examine us. I am also sure that if anyone could find a way to communicate with any ants, a lot of people would doing so because I am sure the ants could teach us humans a thing or two.

    18. Re:Contact by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      So why haven't these other worlds contacted us?

      Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.

      (with apologies to Bill Watterson)

    19. Re:Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse than that. Life on Earth has substantially impacted the chemical signature of Earth to one that is quite distinct for at least two billion years. Aliens can not only see our planet but any alien, even if from a completely different type of planet would flag our as interesting. Only size might matter if from a larger planet and therefore over looking small planets.

      Given that the chances of life evolving to this stage look to be very low, a process of evolution that took three to four billion years on Earth and the apparent lack of FTL we can't expect many alien visitors. However, there we've been visible for so long does raise the chances of someone having visited once or having sent a probe.

      Traditional theories are based on the notion that we've been sending out radio waves but I have been pointing out for a while since the Kepler program identified the chemistry of remote planets that we can push back that date by which we are visible across a wide area of the galaxy a substantial amount. I hope the work in the article above will give a good baseline to work out from how many light years and by how many stars.

      We still have no definite sign of visitation, no probes, visits, signals or evidence of self replicating machines roaming the galaxy, nothing anywhere near definite. We are likely alone.

  4. What are the chances - probability? by no-body · · Score: 1

    My guess 100 % by the number of suns/exoplanets.
    Yet, the time factor plays a big role - billions of suns ? light years apart, mutual observations are delayed, are they still valid? Alpha Centauri for sure, any other's?

  5. Simpsons did it first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, technically it was Futurama, but close enough.

  6. Time Frame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We have come from building Stonehenge to identifying exoplanets in an eye blink of time in the history of the universe. To speculate on aliens using the same techniques that we have come up with in our current lifetime is kind of silly. Either they aren't looking for exoplanets at all, or they've developed much more accurate measures to detect other worlds than solar transits. (Or perhaps "they" don't exist at all.)

  7. Guessing at alien technology is difficult by joe_frisch · · Score: 4, Informative

    They are looking for worlds that could see us using our current technology. Its an interesting study, but 100 years ago we would have tried (and failed) with a very different technique (direct telescopic examination). 100 years from now we may be using a completely different technology (solar system sized interferometers?, Some new trick to drastically reduce stray light in an image? X-ray telescopes? I have no idea) )

    We know nothing about alien technology (if it even exists). It may have followed similar paths to ours, but it might be wildly different.

    1. Re:Guessing at alien technology is difficult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ours is based on progressively building upon mathematics and reverse engineering the universe around us. That follows a path of least resistance and has a dependency graph. That is you must find out A before B. It's unlikely or perhaps even impossible for aliens to take a significantly alternative route to us overall, at least not when it comes to the level we're at, we're not deep enough yet in mathematics, physics, etc for there to be much scope for differentiation. It's very likely the more a race progresses the more scope for going very far down specific paths. At the moment it's very hard for us not to be close to breadth first in our advancements.

  8. Original paper? by HBI · · Score: 1

    Why this puff piece? I would hope there was more meat to the original paper.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:Original paper? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, as of late articles about astronomy have been overrun with unnecessary injection of LIFE!!!!! It's no more than an attempt to make it more "sexy" - read clickbait - to the average reader and many online sites (ala The Daily Galaxy) have grabbed that flag with ferver. And, as demonstrated with this very example, they are shoddy in their use of language because of it.

  9. Sagan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think sagan proved theres life on earth in the 90s. Im not joking either. Nature paper.

  10. They're On Their Way by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    The wave front of the first broadcast of Wayne Newton's "Danke Schoen" is now 54 light years from Earth. The alien extermination fleet is probably already on its way.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:They're On Their Way by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I think it is more appropriate to measure distances in "What's New Pussycats" than Danke Shoens. First of all, the latter is in a foreign language and therefore won't be immediately connected with Earth.

      John Mulaney has an outstanding story about "What's New Pussycat" and the best dinner he's ever had.

    2. Re:They're On Their Way by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "First of all, the latter is in a foreign language and therefore won't be immediately connected with Earth."

      I certainly hope you wrote that tongue in cheek.

    3. Re:They're On Their Way by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that except for the title two words, "Danke Schön", Newton sang the song in English. I too hope that was tongue in cheek.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    4. Re:They're On Their Way by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      "First of all, the latter is in a foreign language and therefore won't be immediately connected with Earth."

      I certainly hope you wrote that tongue in cheek.

      English was spoken by the aliens in all the sci-fi films I have ever seen.

    5. Re:They're On Their Way by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      I think his tongue has done busted through his cheek by now.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    6. Re:They're On Their Way by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Sure. "Universal Translators" can change anything to English, dontchaknow. Except Klingon.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    7. Re:They're On Their Way by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Yah, that's a great bit. I listen to it occasionally. He's a good story-teller.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  11. Re:What are the chances - probability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Time is indeed an important factor. For one, the universe is only 13 billion years old; a baby by cosmological time scales. Earth could be the first, or one of the first, worlds where life has arisen. We might actually be all alone for now.

    Or if the universe is a simulation, then Earth might be the only place that either exists or has life coded into the sim.

  12. "Watch the skies everywhere. by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    Keep looking. Keep watching the skies"........The Thing from another World

  13. How Many Planets Are There? by kenwd0elq · · Score: 4, Informative

    Considering that we detect planets that transit the parent star, and that we've detected thousands of them, AND that such an occultation is visible ONLY when the Earth is precisely on the plane of that system's ecliptic ... the only viable conclusion must be that planets around other star systems are LITERALLY as "common as dirt". It's likely that there are planets around MOST stars.

    1. Re:How Many Planets Are There? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To take it further, if there are numerous planets that we can't see, I would think the probability that there are more planets than we know that can see Earth-sun transits.

    2. Re:How Many Planets Are There? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Considering that we detect planets that transit the parent star

      Not so. Exoplanets can also be detected by slight wobbling of the star they orbit.

    3. Re:How Many Planets Are There? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      According to a quick google, the current guess is 1.6 planets per star system in the Milky Way, for a total of 160,000,000,000 planets in the galaxy. And at least 1/6th of star systems are thought to have a terrestrial planet sized similar to Earth.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re: How Many Planets Are There? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice one. So 1/6 of 160 trillion?

    5. Re: How Many Planets Are There? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 trillion or so?
      So... Then what

    6. Re:How Many Planets Are There? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can also detect exoplanets through the wobble of the parent star... BUT!
      Both of those require watching a few orbits of the exo-planet in question...

      Earth takes 1 year to orbit our star, kepler started it's mission in '09 and has been redirected to a different part of the sky at least once since then, I believe the longest we've watched any given place for planets was ~4 years. (I could be mistaken, it's been a few years since I looked)

      if we need to see 2 or 3 passes of a planet that means the longest orbital period we could have picked up is something like 1.3 years.
      So far if we were looking at the sun for planets, we would have picked up on Mercury, Venus, and earth, we'd might have caught on to mars, and we might have a slight idea that there is more there, because the orbits are off due to the mass of the gas giants, but we wouldn't KNOW they are there for another few decades minimum, probably closer to 100 years or so.

      Planets are probably as common as stars, probably more common, and we really only know about the short orbital period planets, so far... odds are longer period planets will be found as we keep looking.

  14. Why waste time doing that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they have to do is log onto Google Maps.

  15. Meanwhile, on Sirius VI. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

    . . .we're reality Three-V.

    ". . . as J'mm tests the native female with the Anal Probe, consider how Mutual of Andromeda protects your homeworld from pesky alien intrusions. . . "

    - Mrrl'nn Prk'nz, host of "Mutual of Andromeda's 'Wild Planet'"

  16. Consequences by HBI · · Score: 1

    Eventually people get fed up with exciting headlines with no actual news associated with them. So it's a self-defeating game they are playing. Silly.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  17. Re: Space (distance) is an illusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember this. The best way to determine whether or not something exists physically is to ask the question that Immanuel Kant asked. If it exists, where is it? And what is it made of?

    Now you know why distance does not exist.

    No, I don't.
    It follows from your quote that distance is not an object, not material.
    The fact that the quote mentions "where" already infers that location is a conceptual thing.
    Distance is defined by 2 locations.

    No need to try to be philosophical about it.

    aRTee

  18. Galactic leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They probably have our personal details, credit cards, etc as well. Reading the news today, everyone else sems to.

  19. Will we be watched? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With an X light year delay, they won't be watching me now for X more years.

  20. Re:Space (distance) is an illusion by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

    One day, in the not too distant future, physicists will wake up from their self-imposed stupor and realize that distance is an illusion of the mind. It does not exist. We will develop technologies that will allow us to travel instantly from anywhere to anywhere. Of course, the aliens, if they exist, have figured this out eons ago and regularly visit us without our knowledge. :-)

    Lead the way.

  21. Re:Their already here by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    There are (at least) two other conclusions from the same data:

    1) Those monuments were far easier to build than you think; and

    2) There have been previous civilizations on Earth that rose above sticks and stones (although the evidence is against them having made it as far as we did - so far).

  22. Re:Space (distance) is an illusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like how you insult physicists when you haven't done a thing. Do you even understand the subject matter? Do you have a degree?

    Talk about entitlement. Just like all millennials.

  23. Re:Their already here by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    The number of ray guns and nuclear reactors found in the ruins of ancient cities is truly proof that aliens were providing the technology.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  24. Next on Sick Sad World by fermion · · Score: 1

    Are allies astronomer watching you have sex?

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  25. Mezozoic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dinosaurs lived between 230 and 65 million years ago, in a time known as the Mesozoic Era. This was many millions of years before the first modern humans. So did most of the other civilizations across the Universe. Most of them possibly extinct... by killer robots!

  26. Re:Their already here by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The number of ray guns and nuclear reactors found in the ruins of ancient cities is truly proof that aliens were providing the technology.

    Maybe they made compostable weapons to keep the galaxy from being cluttered up with detritus from their endless wars. They used a lot of iridium in 'em.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Look at those crazy fucking primates by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    We had better keep an eye on them and make sure they don't know we are here until they evolve.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  28. No we are not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no way we are being watched because any alien species watching us would have killed us with fire by now.