Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What's a Practical Response To the Equifax Breach?

In response to the massive Equifax cybersecurity incident impacting approximately 143 million U.S. consumer -- making it possibly the worst leak of personal info ever -- Slashdot reader AdamStarks asks: What steps can the average Joe take to protect their identity? Accepting Equifax's help forfeits your right to sue; it's the same with applying for protection at TransUnion (not sure about Experian). Extra services at those companies also cost money, but that's putting even more of your data in their hands, and it's not clear whether the protection/help they provide is worth it (leaving aside not wanting to reward bad behavior).

217 comments

  1. Two Words.... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    CLASS ACTION!

    1. Re:Two Words.... by acvh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why? So a handful of law firms can score big dollars while you and I get a check for $15 and 2 years of free credit monitoring? Class action suits rarely (never?) help the actual victims.

    2. Re:Two Words.... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, but that several billion dollar judgement hit sure hurts The Credit Mongers! They HATE to lose money. Maybe a couple billion in THEIR losses, might make them a bit more cautious about not caring about OUR losses when they allow BS like this to happen.... Hmmm? Maybe? :-P

    3. Re:Two Words.... by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      There isn't a cancer horrible enough for you.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Two Words.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Won't accomplish a thing.

      A simple command is better: killall -q

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re: Two Words.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the comment you replied to was vile, so was yours. You have a long history of being a scumbucket and making offensive comments like that. Fuck off.

    6. Re: Two Words.... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      While the comment you replied to was vile, MightyMartian never deserves a response.

    7. Re:Two Words.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolls are more elegant in their demands for compensation =P

    8. Re:Two Words.... by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, if you agree to their free credit monitoring, you get it for a year...and then you're on the hook to pay for it if you don't cancel. One would almost think this was engineered to boost subscriptions to their credit monitoring service....nah....

      https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/0...

      And it's not like you have the option to tell creditors to NOT share your data with these asshats.

      Pay cash for everything and leave these jackals twisting in the wind.

    9. Re:Two Words.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled "GUN LAWS".

      FTFY.

      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    10. Re:Two Words.... by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      Class action suits rarely (never?) help the actual victims.

      Sure, and locking drunk drivers up rarely (never?) brings back people killed by drunk drivers.

      Stop thinking of class action lawsuits as something the individuals "win" to make things all better.

      Class action lawsuits ARE an effective tool in preventing otherwise omnipotent mega-corporations from trampling all over consumers, and they're one of the very few that don't depend on bribable politicians or idiotic voters.

      Don't think they're effective in instilling fear in corporations? Then explain to me why equifax is so desperately trying to avoid them that they tried the laughably bad tactic of forcing people to give up their right to it to know if they had been hacked? Just as an extra "LOL fuck you"?

      Class action lawsuits aren't to make everything right again, legal punishments never do.

    11. Re:Two Words.... by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 1

      Two Words:

      Torches, pitchforks...

    12. Re: Two Words.... by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      shit happens.

    13. Re:Two Words.... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      If it made Experian go out of business, and the other two invest heavily in security to prevent another event (or even if they don't and are subsequently put out of business), that's fine. I'd like to be made whole, but since that's not going to happen, let some lawyer take the cash.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    14. Re:Two Words.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you agree to their free credit monitoring, you get it for a year...and then you're on the hook to pay for it if you don't cancel. One would almost think this was engineered to boost subscriptions to their credit monitoring service....nah....

      https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/0...

      And it's not like you have the option to tell creditors to NOT share your data with these asshats.

      Pay cash for everything and leave these jackals twisting in the wind.

      Yes rat catching was the first thing that cynically pooped into my head. Also when you agree to the free one year credit monitoring, you agree to arbitration and not file suit.

    15. Re:Two Words.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh "Popped into my head". Curse you Freud.

    16. Re:Two Words.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It won't hurt some of them: https://techcrunch.com/2017/09...

      I'm sure they were planning to sell them anyway. Just a coincidence, yes.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re: Two Words.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Here you go. This is the exact point. There's one big one of them and 143 million of us, the swarm will be able to overpower them in legal matters so it means we should be able to force this to be done the right way. And if these bastards go out of business then so much the better

    18. Re: Two Words.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, same BS all of corporate America needs. Hire smarter nerds to put everyone through security training. Stop using Kaspersky. Donno, can't help but wish this is the modern day version of fight club.

    19. Re:Two Words.... by KingTank · · Score: 1

      The Russian mafia will just steal your identity and collect your class action winnings.

    20. Re:Two Words.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you must be filthy rich if you can buy a house with cash.

    21. Re:Two Words.... by ichimunki · · Score: 2

      Since the breach happened at Equifax, it would be utterly bizarre if a lawsuit made Experian go out of business.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    22. Re:Two Words.... by pthisis · · Score: 1

      If it made Experian go out of business, and the other two invest heavily in security to prevent another event

      I assume that's a thinko for Equifax (not experian)

      There are 4 other credit bureaus, not 2; Experian, Innovis, PRBC, Transunion. Though PRBC is weird.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
  2. Quit job, close accounts, change name, leave count by Narcocide · · Score: 0

    ry.

    The chance to fight this has long passed. You all asked for this. You all begged for it. Now, you've got it.

  3. Forfeit your right to sue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Then I say they forfeit their right to live. Off with their heads!

  4. Bend over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The average person is not an Equifax top exec that was able to cash out before the news got out.

  5. Shut it down and fine the executives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Class-action will only transfer additional costs on to the consumers.

    I vote to shut it down, have the FTC or somebody step in, and force a direct payout to the consumers, bypassing all the fucking lawyers.

  6. bend over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucked you are.

  7. Per Brian Krebs... by jddj · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't waste your time or money on their monitoring "services", which don't do much. Instead, freeze your credit with each of the agencies.

    Krebs' "Dumpster Fire" post on the Equifax debacle is worth reading.

    https://krebsonsecurity.com/20...

    1. Re:Per Brian Krebs... by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Don't waste your time or money on their monitoring "services", which don't do much.

      Um, here's Brian Krebs's takeaway from the end of the article you linked:

      My advice: Sign up for credit monitoring if you can (and you’re not holding out for a puny class action windfall) and then freeze your credit files at the major credit bureaus (it is generally not possible to sign up for credit monitoring services after a freeze is in place).

    2. Re:Per Brian Krebs... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I can't! I'm in the middle of a refi!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Per Brian Krebs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can put a temp unfreeze by party. So you could allow your lender access after you freeze.

    4. Re:Per Brian Krebs... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Their site is even worse than Krebs points out. I followed a link in a CNN article to the Equifax site. If I enter certain personal info, it purports to tell me if I'm affected by the hack and says it will give me the option to sign up for TrustedID Premier.

      I put in my last name, a few digits of my SSN, and passed the captcha. It took me directly to a page thanking me for signing up for TrustedID Premier. It never told me if I was affected. Since others are getting the site to (sorta) work, I'm not sure if it was the fact that I was in incognito mode, my ad blocker, or my various script blockers which caused the site to malfunction. It sure as h*ll better not have signed me up for TrustedID Premier.

    5. Re: Per Brian Krebs... by jddj · · Score: 1

      To have a legally-enforceable 'click-wrap' contract, they have to have given you a 'meaningful opportunity to review the terms' (this per the ABA Cyberlaw working group a few years ago). That may be as little as a link to the terms and conditions page.

      You should (per recent news stories) have 30 days to opt out of arbitration in writing, so get on that.

    6. Re: Per Brian Krebs... by jddj · · Score: 1

      Yes, he does, and I thought it was a little contradictory to the earlier passage where he says:

      "I have repeatedly urged readers to consider putting a security freeze on their accounts in lieu of or in addition to accepting these free credit monitoring offers, noting that credit monitoring services donâ(TM)t protect you against identity theft (the most you can hope for is they alert you when ID thieves do steal your identity), while security freezes can prevent thieves from taking out new lines of credit in your name." ...which drove my thoughts on it.

  8. First thing: request a credit freeze by sandbagger · · Score: 5, Informative

    The security freeze prevents anyone, even you, from opening a credit account or getting a loan in your name, including yourself, until you lift the freeze.

    You never know about a identity theft until after the fact and weird bills start coming in. Basically you agree to a PIN number. No new loans can take place in your name unless the applicant knows the number.

    It's close to free but there may be a few $10 fees depending on where you do it: https://www.transunion.com/cre...

    The credit reputation agencies don't offer it by default because their business model is to sell you fraud alert monitoring services. Logically, if there's a freeze, there's nothing for them to monitor. This is the cheapest and best solution.

    Second, stop giving Equifax your money.
    Third, class action suit.

    PS: Krebs on Security has a great piece that's now a few years old but shows why credit freezes are good and the other crap sold by Equifax and their peers are more or less useless in comparison: Transition and Experien promote have little value: https://krebsonsecurity.com/20...

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
    1. Re:First thing: request a credit freeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And how exactly does a freeze help, if the next credit bureau hack obtains all those freeze PINs?

      There's nothing you can realistically do to protect yourself against these attacks. The entire business model of storing a bunch of sensitive information about literally everyone in a single place is fundamentally fucked from the beginning. Especially when they have very little incentive to safeguard data about us peasants.

    2. Re:First thing: request a credit freeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. And there seems to be a weird focus on credit. I am much more concerned about identity. I really don't care much if you open accounts in my name, as I don't really need any credit, and I don't intend to pay the bogus accounts. It's much more of a problem when the perp just drains your bank account using the identity they have stolen. Alas, freezing your credit does nothing to protect what actually matters -- your assets.

    3. Re:First thing: request a credit freeze by nnet · · Score: 1

      And how exactly does a freeze help, if the next credit bureau hack obtains all those freeze PINs?

      Four different bureaus, four different PINs. What said a single bureau has the PINs of other bureaus? For that matter, what said THIS breach has any PIN info?

    4. Re:First thing: request a credit freeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Canadians? There seems to be nothing about this freeze option on the .ca versions of their web pages, and going to the US page will prompt for SSN and State, while Canadians use SIN/Province.

    5. Re:First thing: request a credit freeze by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      And how exactly does a freeze help, if the next credit bureau hack obtains all those freeze PINs?

      You don't seem to realize what you're asking, since you're basically questioning the value of setting up passwords (PINs) for accounts that currently don't have them, and you're suggesting that there's no point in bothering with passwords in the first place since subsequent attacks may suck them up.

      Never mind that freezing your accounts (i.e. locking it behind a password):
      1) Makes the currently leaked data useless to bad actors until and unless they succeed in capturing your PIN via a hypothetical second hack.

      2) Limits the damage from a hypothetical second hack to a single credit bureau, since PINs are unique to each credit bureau.

      3) May buy you time to reset the protection on your account if a second hack occurs, since the PINs are hopefully hashed and salted, meaning that bad actors won't have an immediate ability to act on them.

      4) Increases the time, complexity, and cost necessary to attack you, making it more likely that they'll skip you and go for an easier target.

      Put differently: it's as if you never bothered installing a lock on the front door to your house and you live in a city where a roaming band of thieves robs anyone whose house they find out is unlocked. They just heard your door had no lock and they just found out where you live. They're coming. There's nothing stopping them from showing up at any moment, walking in, and taking everything from you. And, knowing all of those facts, your response is to question what the point is in installing a lock, since it's possible that they may steal your keys later.

      Sure, fine, maybe they will, but in the meantime you can stop this attack by just installing a lock, so maybe we postpone the discussion about the inherent brokenness of the system until after you lock your door?

    6. Re:First thing: request a credit freeze by Pyramid · · Score: 1

      FIVE Credit Bureaus!

      Equifax
      Trans Union
      Experian
      Innovis
      PRBC ---I'm currently fighting with these chuckleheads. They have no online freeze method or even instructions. The "form" they emailed me was for a dispute. When I questioned how I'm supposed to use this to freeze my information with them, per state law, I was directed to *snail mail* or call them for instructions.

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
  9. What not to do... by BenJeremy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...don't respond to the breach by forcing users to go to a phishy-sounding "equifaxsecurity2017.com" web site (I've actually had phishing e-mails directing me to go to "paypal2017.com" and such. Worse, don't direct them to a THIRD site that doesn't even have a valid certificate, causing Chrome, Firefox and other browsers to scream "Dangerous and Deceptive Site!!!!" with a big red warning screen.

    Lastly, don't force them to join your crappy credit monitoring site in order to find out if they are part of the breach... and thereby forcing them to renounce their ability to sue you.

    The clueless executives need to be fired, and probably anybody on their IT staff with "security" in their title or job requirements.

    1. Re:What not to do... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      It appears that Equifax's primary response to the breach wasn't centered around the consumers whose information they gave up - it was an attempt to cover their butts and try to somehow distance themselves from the damage, if possible. Note that their initial statement didn't apologize for losing people's data to thieves... it apologized for the "anxiety" people might be feeling.

      So from their viewpoint, it would make sense for them to shuffle all of this over to a completely different domain, keeping it off equifax.com as much as possible.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re: What not to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were not clueless executives. They cashed out at the oppertun time...

  10. Blockchain is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of these problems are solved by the blockchain. It's time to start pushing for it.

    1. Re:Blockchain is the answer by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Right, because Bitcoin is SUCH a safe alternative. How many Bitcoin exchanges have been shut down at this point because of embezzlement or money laundering schemes? I've lost count. At least your bank account is FDIC insured in the US... with Bitcoin you're basically screwed because it's largely unregulated.

    2. Re:Blockchain is the answer by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Oh, and there is nothing wrong with the blockchain technology itself. It's a great idea, but many of the developers building on it seemed to have built some pretty half assed and insecure solutions so far.

    3. Re:Blockchain is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fuck would you keep a significant amount of Bitcoin you're not actively spending/trading on an exchange?

    4. Re:Blockchain is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >regurgitated "communism is good but the implementations have been shitty" argument.

    5. Re:Blockchain is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how often does such FDIC-insured money ever get to the people who get stolen from? The US government cannot be trusted to maintain the value of its currency. Ever since switching to fiat and locking inflation to 2%, the US gov't just prints money whenever it wants to. There's no stability in currency of any kind. The only thing with value these days are the big purchases: land, homes, cars. Without those, you're considered a pleb and not worth protecting.

      The charges against exchanges were attempts to delegitimize and destabilize Bitcoin. The US has a history of meddling with other currencies; what makes you think Bitcoin's any different?

      In short, the US government cannot be trusted to take care of its own people.

    6. Re: Blockchain is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not quite. blockchain ledgers are stil useful for other things and could be backed by real assets. communism on the other hand can never work no matter how it's implemented.

    7. Re: Blockchain is the answer by zilym · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And even with owning land, homes, and cars we can't trust the govt stealing those from us too under civil asset forfeiture law.

    8. Re:Blockchain is the answer by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      FDIC has protected all relevant checking and savings accounts since its founding. Why are you trying to claim otherwise?

      When it can, the FDIC does try to pressure other banks to buy up a failed bank, and have the bank making the purchase make good the accounts. If that doesn't work, the FDIC pays.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  11. panic, you are fucked by Osgeld · · Score: 2

    Seriously, besides the waving the right to participate in a class action lawsuit, which might net you a fucking nickel in a decade, you are fucked, and what's the response, sign up for security?

    cause security obviously works

    how bout you actually watch and keep up with your shit, like you should be doing anyway ... I dunno about you, but I am not so filthy rich that I dont keep track of what I buy, and check on the card (yes card not cards) at least once a week to make sure everything is as it should be

    1. Re: panic, you are fucked by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      What if they don't charge it against your checking accound or CC number? What if they only use your name and SSN, tying it to your credit score, and leaving it between you, the big three, and the debt collector to sort how who is on the hook for the debt.

    2. Re:panic, you are fucked by nnet · · Score: 2

      its good you check on the card you know about.

    3. Re: panic, you are fucked by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      Is there an edit button should my proof reading skills fail me? iOS' spellchecker is crappier than I am,...

    4. Re:panic, you are fucked by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 4, Informative

      When I experienced identity theft it wasn't through bogus charges on my credit card (which my bank normally picks up on right away) but through about a dozen newly-opened store-specific credit card purchases and utility bills in places between 1,000 and 4,000 miles away from where I live.

      That's not something I could have easily monitored by just checking my bank's website.

      In my case the perpetrator was caught by police in another state within a day or two of my first learning about the first bogus account. Not everybody is so lucky.

  12. Political change by manu0601 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That sad story could be used to ask for political change.

    There are countries where knowing someone's SSN is not enough to get a credit on his behalf, why US residents could not enjoy similar protection by law?

    1. Re:Political change by netsavior · · Score: 0, Troll

      because the half of the US that really needs consumer protection laws believes that red hats and tax cuts for the wealthy are the only america they need.

    2. Re:Political change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why US residents could not enjoy similar protection by law?

      Because all the US lawmakers have been bought by businesses, you think any lawmaker is going to propose a law that benefits the public at the expense of businesses?

      "Identity Theft" is mainly a US only thing. In Europe and many places in Asia, it is the *lender's* responsibility to verify the identity of the borrower. When a dispute go the courts, the judge will ask the lender for more than just the borrower's SSN or some ID number as proof that a loan have been taken by the alleged borrower.

    3. Re: Political change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think this is, Europe? Here, the laws serve moneyed interests. The good news is that we have an equal opportunity meritocracy so that you can join the moneyed class. Just enlist with a reputable capital organization like Wells Fargo, hit all your theft quotas, and you will be well on your way.

    4. Re:Political change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sad story could be used to ask for political change.

      and it will be, but not by us. We're too busy jeering at their incompetence. Neoliberals will use it to push for hard-to-evade, cheap-to-query bag-of-meat "e-identity." Tested on third world favelas, now coming to mainstream USA. Any shopping website or comment forum will be able to query your government-issued ID fob and get a lifetime evercookie for you. Want to enter a drawing, collect some coupons, sign up for a Google account and get 15GByte free storage? No problem, but "for your security," please let us look at your evercookie and record it in our database. Because Fraud. Because an unreliable credit system hurts us all. Because you're scared and stupid.

      And the experts that should've suggested otherwise (us) have allowed ourselves to be sidelined.

    5. Re:Political change by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      First of all other countries don't have a ssn. That's a US thing that's been totally abused over the years.

      Second of all, a SSN isn't enough. You have to already have good credit, you have to know the name that goes with that SSN and other data. Last I knew you need 5 data points.

      Political change? You mean like the total overthrow of the US Government? Because that's what it'll take. SSN isn't going anywhere, too much is based on it. The political change you are talking about - you don't have to worry about credit. You have to worry about if you're still alive or not. BTW, It's very likely you'll be one of the first dead, remember that. You think it's the other guy, time and time again when the left takes over, they kill just about anything in sight. Even their "own" people that helped them. They refer to them as useful idiots.

  13. Leave Equifax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would Equifax be hurt if many people wrote asking to be removed from Equifax records? I pay as I go, have no use of or need for credit, so I am tempted to ask Equifax to delete all records of me.

    1. Re:Leave Equifax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice idea. you go ahead and try to get a data broker to actually delete stuff and not maintain a record on you. good luck with that.

    2. Re:Leave Equifax? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      nice idea. you go ahead and try to get a data broker to actually delete stuff and not maintain a record on you. good luck with that.

      Change your name to a base64 representation of some child porn, then send the feds after them?

    3. Re:Leave Equifax? by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      LOL, on what grounds? The DMCA?

  14. Torches and pitchforks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Time to end the three credit reporting cartels and while we are at it end fico.

  15. Two other words by El+Cubano · · Score: 5, Informative

    CREDIT FREEZE

    What steps can the average Joe take to protect their identity? Accepting Equifax's help forfeits your right to sue; it's the same with applying for protection at TransUnion (not sure about Experian). Extra services at those companies also cost money, but that's putting even more of your data in their hands, and it's not clear whether the protection/help they provide is worth it (leaving aside not wanting to reward bad behavior).

    Here is a good guide on freezing your credit: http://clark.com/personal-fina...

    There is no reason for the vast majority of people to leave their credit open. Seriously, most people apply for new credit maybe once every few years, if that. Leaving your credit open is simply asking for trouble.

    As they say, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure (or their SI equivalents if you don't like conventional weights and measures).

    1. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not even https....

    2. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The problem with freezing your credit is that you have to pay for the privilege of not being spied on and exploited. And you have to pay this fee to each reporting agency. Then you have to pay again if you need to unfreeze it. For example to change insurance companies or buy something expensive. Since Obama Care, insurance changes are a yearly thing now. Then you pay again to freeze it afterwards. Pay, pay, pay!

      It's just another scam to nickle and dime us to death for things that shouldn't exist in the first place.

    3. Re:Two other words by somenickname · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... I just finished freezing all 3 credit agencies and it cost me $6 and about 10 minutes of time. As far as Security Bang For Buck goes, I don't know if it gets any better than that. They give you a pin number so, in a few years, if I need to unfreeze, it should take about 10 minutes and, if it again costs me $6, I'm definitely OK with that.

    4. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So you willingly got ripped off. It shouldn't cost a dime to freeze or unfreeze your credit agency reports.

      Also - you will likely find out it's not going to be a few years before you need to unfreeze them. And unfreezing is not going to take 10 minutes if they suspect fraud.

    5. Re:Two other words by somenickname · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree that it should have been free but, a stable adult rarely needs to do anything related to credit checks. Even beyond that, I am 100% willing to give up convenience for palpable online security. I've never had my identity stolen, never had a virus on my computer, never had a website password breach compromise another account, etc. And the reason for that is that I'm cautious and willing to inconvenience myself to avoid a threat. As soon as I read about credit freezes (on this website!) I decided that the threat was much, much larger than any inconvenience I would invoke by freezing my credit. The Experian breach is a Big Deal and the adults in the room are inoculating themselves against it regardless of the hassle.

    6. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cost vary by state. For some states if over age of 62/65 all is free.

    7. Re:Two other words by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      Since Obama Care, insurance changes are a yearly thing now.

      If you think that's something that only started with Obamacare, you probably have all your money in that Rush Limbaugh gold coin scam and really don't need to worry about people stealing from your bank account anyway.

    8. Re:Two other words by gumbi+west · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wait, there has to be a PIN recovery system. And guess who would now have all the data needed to reset the PIN.

    9. Re: Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is when you use HTTPS Everywhere.

    10. Re: Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're both the problem and the solution. Just like some two bit Jonny, you pay the club - it'd be a shame if one of those thugs bust your windows.

      Ain't that right Rico? Yeah, it'd be a damn shame. Uncle Don 'll see ya right though. He don't take no shit from those hoodlums.

    11. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is stopping someone who is mid-process in stealing your identity (has PII, but no lines of credit yet), from unfreezing your credit?

      An honest question.

    12. Re:Two other words by Bitmanhome · · Score: 2

      A credit freeze just freezes your credit reports, not the actual credit. Since all your info is leaked, this is probably pretty useless.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    13. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What sucks about the credit freeze is the bureaus get to charge you for setting a flag on your credit report. In my state it isn't much, $3, but think about it for a moment - they make a crap ton of money off my information that I never agreed to allow them to have, they have the power through their manipulation of the "credit score" to prevent me from getting credit and I have to pay them to prevent my data from being used by potential identity thieves?

      I'm a big free market capitalist and prefer the government stay out of the business sector, but I'm even thinking it is about time for firms with this much power over our lives to be heavily regulated and possibly even forced to become non-profit public/private entities.

    14. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the best protection is to have really shitty credit.

    15. Re:Two other words by archer,+the · · Score: 1

      It will prevent thieves from opening new credit cards or taking new loans out. I don't know if it would stop someone from buying a new cell phone with your info and running up a large bill, or stop someone from getting a drivers license with your name.

      I froze my credit several years ago. I needed to unlock it twice this year. I don't see myself unlocking it again for 10 years or so. Yes, it costs a little money for the initial lock and then for every unlock, but $12/unlock is cheaper than a monthly fee for identity monitoring.

    16. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your basis for your claim? Last time I checked my credit reports, I found I was living in a state 500 miles from my current home (a state I hadn't visited in decades) and had a canceled credit card there. I've lived here (not there) for almost 40 years, have exactly zero outstanding debt (other than my monthly CC balances), am in (relatively) good health and no criminal record (aside from traffic tickets). If I'm not a "stable adult", then you need to better articulate your asinine statement. My formal objection to the information was added to my "file", that's it. "With great power, goes great responsibility." (in a better world) They need to be crucified, not because they failed, but because their supposed efforts have been criminally negligent.

    17. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KASPERSKY claims link is phishing site!!!

    18. Re: Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Social justice warriors tend to stick to social justice issues. This is a "this guy actually bought the propaganda" issue. Totally different group of people trying to convince you to step up your citizenship game.

    19. Re:Two other words by srichard25 · · Score: 1

      You supply a PIN when you freeze your credit and it cannot be unfrozen without that PIN.

    20. Re: Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awww cute. a mitm option for non ssl sources. idiot. So HOW does this make an http source be encrypted? Exactly.

    21. Re:Two other words by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Clark only has 3 of the 5 major credit bureaus listed at that link; PRBC is a little wonky, but if you're freezing your credit you'll want to freeze it with Equifax, Experian, Innovis, and TransUnion. http://krebsonsecurity.com/201... has all 4, or use Clark's links and add https://www.innovis.com/person...

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    22. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any time you open a bank account in the US, they access your credit report. If you have a freeze, they can't access it and the bank will not let you open your account. Yes, you need to have your credit checked even if you want to GIVE money to the bank. This is a feature of the PATRIOT act or some similar thing. If your credit report is "flagged," meaning anything like e.g. you have fraud alert turned on, the bank will also refuse to open your account.

    23. Re:Two other words by zeugma-amp · · Score: 2

      It depends largely upon where you live. Went to transunion earlier today and they wanted to charge me $10.50 for a credit freeze. They didn't even state how long it was good for. I'd guess a year. So, if I want to freeze my credit report at all 3 agencies, it would likely cost me more than $30/year.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    24. Re:Two other words by Afty0r · · Score: 1

      As a non-USian who might move there soon, is my credit "open" by default? And with how many agencies?

    25. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A freeze used to be temporary, but now it is permanents until you unfreeze it. At least in the U.S.

    26. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You supply a PIN when you freeze your credit and it cannot be unfrozen without that PIN.

      Apparently not. The PIN is assigned and is just a timestamp. Those that existed were included in the leak.

      Why do people post lies?

    27. Re:Two other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but I worked for Lifelock for a bit, and honestly, a credit freeze kinda messes with your life. You have a hard time changing banks, getting a new vehicle, potentially a new apartment or house, can't get new credit cards, possibly can't start doing business with some utility companies, and a slew of other things. The "thaw" data/PIN isn't instantly transmitted to the various reporting agencies, so its quite possible that you try to get a new loan for something, then... well, look, they can't run your credit, that's weird? Most places that require a credit report, upon seeing a credit freeze will just tell you to go somewhere else. It is NOT a good solution for the average person.

    28. Re:Two other words by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I know anecdote is not data. but in the years since the Affordable Care Act was in effect, my costs for coverage has gone up at a lower percentage than before. so I'd consider that partially effective.

    29. Re:Two other words by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      The people whose lives it's saved would tend to disagree.

  16. The only correct response... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is to never have been in that dataset in the first place.

    Yeah, this is a problem. We could have seen it coming and arguably governments should have and fixed it for everyone before it could become a problem. But we didn't, so we get to learn the hard way.

    1. Re: The only correct response... by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      Good luck with not being in that dataset. Just checked my against one of the other two today, and they have my checking account on file, and one loan from the same bank.

    2. Re: The only correct response... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Which is why you need governments to step in and do a fairly specific few sensible things. But most governments still haven't a clue what those might be, in fact most people haven't the faintest idea either. I don't have the full solution either, but at least I can see the outline of one.

  17. Basically everyone is affected by netsavior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    basically everyone with a bank account or water bill is affected. This is an industry altering breech. There is no reason to believe you have any ability to do anything about it.

    I am not being defeatist, this will cause necessary change in the entire industry.

    1. Re:Basically everyone is affected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. It probably won't cause any change whatsoever.

    2. Re:Basically everyone is affected by somenickname · · Score: 1

      I am not being defeatist, this will cause necessary change in the entire industry.

      Right. Just like how in 2008 the narrow miss of a global economic meltdown has caused necessary change in the entire industry...

    3. Re:Basically everyone is affected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an industry altering breech.

      I don't think they're wearing any pants now.

    4. Re:Basically everyone is affected by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of shoving an artillery shell in there.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Basically everyone is affected by lessthan0 · · Score: 1

      Everyone was affected by the 2008 Mortgage Fraud recession, but it was not industry altering, other than minor legislation that has been chipped away to nothing. Banks are too big to fail. Look at the continuing fraud from Wells Fargo, Citi, and B of A. Organized criminal organizations.

      Equifax may not have that kind of clout. We'll see.

  18. Lifelock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lifelock is the best identity theft protection available. Signing up for identity theft protection from Lifelock is the single best thing you can do. You wouldn't pay a dental monitor to tell you if you have a cavity. No, you pay a dentist to diagnose and fix it. Lifelock will help you determine if your personal information is available on the dark web, detect if you've been a victim of identity theft, and then work at their own expense to undo any damage caused by the identity theft.

    1. Re:Lifelock by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You mean this LifeLock?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re: Lifelock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf Lifelock? Did you not read the post about just freezing the credit profile outright?

      Splain' to me again why any one needs someone looking at their charges in "real-time". When you buy Lifelock, you pay for the access to talk to an underpaid call center agent about the weather, sports, etc. Don't be mistaken that they will do anything other than what you can do yourself by making 3 phone calls instead of 1.

    3. Re: Lifelock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha!

      Internet wins again.

    4. Re:Lifelock by sexconker · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not a security guard. I'm a security monitor. I let people know when there's a robbery.

      There's a robbery.

  19. Heavy fines from FCC and/or mandatory SoP by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Heavy fines from the FCC for such breaches no matter the cause, and/or impose standard operating procedures based on best practices.

    1. Re:Heavy fines from FCC and/or mandatory SoP by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

      Won't happen. The FCC is too hell bent on killing net neutrality so the communications oligarchy can enrich themselves further.
      To even suggest this FCC has any concerns for consumer protections is laughable. The only way to fix this is campaign finance reform. Get real in the oval office and as our elected "representatives" who care about voters and citizens over the current Plutocracy.

  20. laws, strong laws for liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A good response would be for laws that make companies that collect data financially responsible for misuse of that data. Either internal misuse or misuse through the information being leaked or stolen.
    Then the companies would have a decision to make either collect the data and take effort to secure it, or don't collect the data.

    1. Re: laws, strong laws for liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, they ARE responsible for misuse of that data. I'm a lawyer and member of the local federal district court bar- I am 100% not worried about this because I take reasonable steps to protect my data, and if somebody actually gets my assets out from under me, I know exactly who to sue. Duty, breach, damages... that's all I need. I suppose it's possible you don't have a duty to me to keep my identity safe, but I wouldn't want to hang my hat on that.

      The odd part in the summary is that there's no way getting monitoring from Transunion would prevent you from suing Experian.

    2. Re: laws, strong laws for liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, they ARE responsible for misuse of that data.
      Oh, so they will comp 100% of the direct and indirect real cost / losses (no less damages) caused to any number of the millions of Americans affected by their negligence? Oh....so they won't? Then they're not responsible after all...

      I'm a lawyer and member of the local federal district court bar-
      What's your purpose? Indicting yourself against any hope of rational discourse, or are you RSVPing your place on the Day of the Rope?

  21. U.S. Government is Corrupt Like Most Others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's absolutely no excuse that credit freezing / thawing should cost anything. Some states allow for fees while others don't.

    Interesting how some things are under federal law and yet often those that can hurt consumers aren't. For example, many credit card issuers get around state usury laws by incorporating in South Dakota and doing business across state lines. For example, in Pennsylvania, a person can't charge more than 18% annual interest (may be lower). Yet, a credit card company that operates from abroad, despite conducting business in Pennsylvania, can. Charging interest rates as high as they want; 20% is common with some credit cards upwards of 36%.

    Rambling on, but one can find numerous examples of legalized corruption. As for what the people can do, writing letters, etc to politicians representing their area and contacting the attorney general of their state may help influence legislation, though often little match against big money interests, who often write the laws.

    If one wants more immediate compensation, they could max out their credit cards, not pay, and then work out a settlement for 25% - 50% or so off. One's credit scores will tank for awhile, but is a little way to get back at the system. More immediate than waiting for any class-action settlement that could take a decade or more to work its way through the courts and likely only pay out in coupons and maybe double-digit cash that might be enough to buy a value meal.

    1. Re:U.S. Government is Corrupt Like Most Others by sexconker · · Score: 1

      If one wants more immediate compensation, they could max out their credit cards, not pay, and then work out a settlement for 25% - 50% or so off. One's credit scores will tank for awhile, but is a little way to get back at the system.

      That only works if you have no assets for them to seize or put a lien on, and if the stuff you bought the the credit cards is un-repo-able. No material goods, only consumables and services.

      I mean, if you've got nothing to lose, why not? Most people have just enough to lose that they're afraid of losing it. That's exactly where the powers that be want us. Teetering on the edge forever. If they push too far, we revolt. If they don't push far enough, then there's MONEY that they don't have, and that's just not right!

  22. Issue New SSNs by crow · · Score: 1

    The government should issue everyone a new Social Security Number. And when they do so, they should add a digit so that we don't run out anytime soon (or start using a mix of letters and numbers). This is a great time to think about what a good replacement would be. For example, there could be a short form of the number that is sufficient for tax reporting, with four random additional digits that are used when applying for credit. If there is ever evidence of fraud, you would receive a new random four digits. (This would be a bit like having a credit freeze for everyone.) I'm sure other people will come up with new and interesting ideas.

    Of course, this means changing all the financial software that has the SSN format hard-coded. I'm fine with that. It would be a bit like Y2K all over again for developers.

    And make Equifax pay for the expense of issuing the new numbers (which probably means forcing it into bankruptcy, doing a new IPO, with the government receiving all the proceeds from the stock sale).

    1. Re: Issue New SSNs by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      The SSN is not meant to be used as an identifier for things like credit. It is being misused.

    2. Re: Issue New SSNs by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

      Your Social Security card says right on it that it's not legal to use it for ANY purpose than social security.

    3. Re: Issue New SSNs by mattack2 · · Score: 0

      Right, let's get rid of social security (or let me opt out of paying AND receiving), as well!

    4. Re:Issue New SSNs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just publish everyone's SSN? What a joke. The Beast is laughing at us.

    5. Re:Issue New SSNs by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Yeah... with the number of social security numbers that were exposed, a complete social security number reset for everyone in the US is the only practical option.

      The fine for this breach also needs to be in the 10 billion range for it to actually make a difference. Basically, you need to make securing your systems LESS expensive than the fine for not doing so before CEO's will start taking security seriously.

    6. Re:Issue New SSNs by crow · · Score: 1

      Well, Equifax's market cap before this was about $20B, so that's the number I would look at.

    7. Re:Issue New SSNs by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      That would fix so many issues. All the old numbers that still get used would be found.
      All the created number that get used stop working.
      All eligible US citizens would get a new number by showing some real citizenship ID. Any old numbers or fake numbers still been used would be detected and investigated.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re: Issue New SSNs by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is you live in a country where you can't even escape taxes by leaving the country.

    9. Re: Issue New SSNs by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Worse than that, it's also used as a secret password.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    10. Re: Issue New SSNs by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Though I presume you get to deduct any taxes paid in another country, just like I can do for e.g. foreign tax paid on investments.

    11. Re: Issue New SSNs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh.. yeah.... nope...

    12. Re: Issue New SSNs by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Though what about this:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      and the "calculation of tax" part makes it sound closer to what I had guessed:

      Although called an exclusion for historical reasons, since the 2006 tax year it is better described as a credit equal to the amount of tax that would have been owed on the eligible foreign income, without considering any deductions or exemptions.

  23. Freeze your credit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't that hard you should be already using it. If you aren't anticipating a REFI on your car/house/boat/helicopter/hovercraft/whatever.. you can ask the bank(s) that has/have your credit cards to freeze your credit. Once frozen you are safe from anybody opening a new line of credit. If for some reason you *do* need to open another line of credit you can unfreeze it again.

    Peace.

    FYI AFAIK this is only in the U.S.A.

    1. Re:Freeze your credit? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You don't freeze your cards, you freeze your credit at the 3 major shitholes - Trannyunion, Equifux, and Suxperian.

  24. Considering knowingly publishing bad information.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for decades has never been punished, the big three credit reporting agencies will continue to knowingly publish bad information. They're not held accountable for their bad information. This is minor in comparison to how they've screwed us in the past.

  25. The only practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only practical solution is to have a dedicated Equifax representative dispatched to each affected party, at their own cost. The representative is obligated to make every effort to personally find and contact the person whose data was lost then provide them with:

    - Full protection / reimbursement from any future fraud
    - 1 complete, heartfelt apology
    - 1 earnest fellatio on the affected party, delegated family member, housepet, or neighbour's housepet

  26. Ripley by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    Nuke them from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  27. Corps and Govt stop treating the SSN as a Secret by williamyf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The SSN, passport number, or, for all practical intents and purposes any government issued number is NOT a secret. There are ways to get those numbers, be it through breaches like this one, or other means.

    The SSN is not a Secret. Is just a number issued by the government to identify you more easily to the Social Security.

    Again, the SSN is not a secret. Nurses, Doctors, Clerks see the number as a matter of routine...
    Your passport number is not a secret. Clerks, security guards and border patrol agents, both in your country and abroad see it on a regular basis.
    Driver license numbers are not a secret.....
    ID Numbers (for countries which issue ID Cards) are not a secret....
    You get the drift....

    Maybe, just maybe, the Goverments and companies will stop treating these numbers (be it the SSN in the USoA, the Cedula or DNI, or what have you ) as a "Secret", and recognize that these are just ID numbers, not secrets, and we move towards a real secret when needed, in the form of, perhaps PIN+SmartCard, or some other mechanism.

    I know, is a loooooong shot, but dreaming is free....

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  28. Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Federal law makes security freezes free retroactively from the beginning of time. Agencies refund any fees already collected, and collect no more. All credit is immediately frozen and must be unfrozen (for free) by the individual, temporarily only.

  29. Freeze the reports, bill equifax for the costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My plan:
    1) Freeze all three agencies ($30 bucks)
    2) Bill Equifax for $30
    3) When they fail to pay the bill, file in small claims court for fees plus $30
    4) When they fail to appear, you have a judgement.
    5) Sell the debt to a collection agency

    1. Re:Freeze the reports, bill equifax for the costs by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      This is actually hilarious. Someone please try this and let us know the results.

    2. Re:Freeze the reports, bill equifax for the costs by PPH · · Score: 2

      1) Freeze all three agencies

      Or just freeze Equifax. If enough people do this, banks and lenders will have to take their business elsewhere.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  30. delete.. by starblazer · · Score: 1

    Let me delete my data... can't keep it safe, you can't keep it at all.

    Once they lose 30% of their data they might start being a little more careful about their cash stream. I lied, I will let them keep one bit of data:
    USER DELETED DATA DUE TO 9/7/whatever breach and make it non-derogatory in the FICO scores.

    1. Re:delete.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be an awesome settlement from a lawsuit.

  31. Re:Considering knowingly publishing bad informatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I applied for a house loan, my credit report had 17 negative items on it that weren't mine. Several were from doctors, a hospital, a dentist, and for unpaid property taxes. I haven't been to a doctor since the army forced me to over thirty years ago. I don't own property so the unpaid property taxes were bogus. Wells Fargo denied my house loan, and I lost the property I had put a deposit on. I talked to a lawyer, and he laughed when I asked if I had a case against Experian. Apparently you can't hold them accountable for publishing bad information.

  32. Best Defense.... by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

    The best defense to the Equifax breach, as it is to all the other data breaches, is to:

    1. NEVER EVER click on a link in an email. Type in the web address yourself.
    2. Check your credit card statements religiously.
    3. Keep your antivirus and anti-malware software up to date.

    Really, aside from the fact that it's Equifax being penetrated, what's the big deal? I get free credit monitoring because my wireless provider T-Mobile was hacked. I get free credit monitoring from somebody else because the U.S. Office of Personnel Management got hacked, revealing EVERY detail of EVERY security clearance applied for in the last 20 years. I got free credit monitoring from somebody else because a credit card provider got hacked.

    Get paranoid about security. Already paranoid? Are you paranoid ENOUGH? Then let it go and live your life.

  33. Mob violence by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    And public lynching.

  34. Make a law by clovis · · Score: 1

    In my dream world I would have Congress make a law to have the credit reporting agencies, financial institutions, or any business holding certain types of information by default to place a freeze on exporting/sharing that information.

    Something like this:
    For example, if a company collects social security numbers or driver's licenses numbers, then that company must by law place a freeze by default on all accounts and ANY information in that file can only be revealed by the owner of the SSN giving specific permission.
    No contract to do business will be allowed that makes data sharing a condition.
    The data-sharing permission can only be asked for after a period of some time, say, 90 days, and the default will be to not grant permission.
    If a business needs to pull a credit report in order to grant me credit, write an insurance policy, or whatever, then the reporting agency will have to find some way to allow me to do a one-time grant of access.

  35. Re:Corps and Govt stop treating the SSN as a Secre by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

    My military serial number is my SSN. (It shouldn't be, and didn't USED to be, and it's illegal, but it's the government and who's going to prosecute them?) For years, in order to write a check at the Base Exchange, we were REQUIRED to have our serial numbers - our SSNs - printed or written on the check.

    For all those companies that want to use the last 4 of your SSN as a security code - you can demand that they assign you a different number.

  36. Re: Considering knowingly publishing bad informati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My roommate works at Equifax, but even she couldn't help me cleanup my credit well enough to get a house loan. She wants me out of here. I have more than sixty bad items since I have a common name. None of them are mine since I have never paid a bill late.

    It is ridiculous that credit agencies aren't held responsible for publishing bad information.

  37. pray to the NSA overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cybersecurity and massive data breaches like this one are the responsibility of the NSA, not peons. The NSA wants things the way they are. The NSA wants us to have faith in them. So just do it. Pray to the NSA. The NSA has already cut off all of our arms and legs in a metaphorical sense when it comes to tactically defending ourselves cybersecurity-wise. Everything as a peon you might consider doing is a joke outshadowed by an assessment (that no peon has the intelligence information to make) of how much your fate rests in the NSA's hands.

    In a decent society, we would all have been running our own home email servers like Hillary Clinton a decade ago, cryptocurrency would have flourished a decade ago, massive cryptocurrency heists would have happened a decade ago, and all of our personal FOSS top to bottom infrastructure would kick the living shit out of the crap we have available today. This is the NSA's baby. Ignore the crying. Or pray. Whatever.

  38. Re: Considering knowingly publishing bad informati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My report shows almost a dozen closed chucking accounts with Wells Fargo. Obviously that isn't correct since they would have never allowed one person to open that many accounts. I got denied a home loan because of that.

  39. Re: Considering knowingly publishing bad informati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you can't sue them, because they are required by federal law to periodically provide you the information they have on you when you request it. They then must follow more federal law to determine the veracity of any entry you dispute.

    Unfortunately, it's your own fault that you were denied, ESPECIALLY because almost everyone knows you follow that procedure before buying a home even if you're not such a stickler you do it every year.

  40. Re:Corps and Govt stop treating the SSN as a Secre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fingerprints too. The names of our first grade teachers and favorite pets as well. It's all a bad joke. Just pray to the NSA.

  41. Re: Considering knowingly publishing bad informati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lost a deposit on a condo since Bank of America wouldn't honor my preapproved loan because of bogus info on my credit report. That condo has since gone up $300k in value since then. I'm pissed I can't hold the credit agencies liable for the loss they caused.

  42. Facebook is next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook is the next target.

  43. Two things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make huge donations to the NRA and the Trump 2020 campaigns. Only they have proven to be on the side of the American people.

  44. Go back to the old days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tar and feathering? Heads on pikes? Run out of town by an angry mob? I'm open to ideas. Funny how much less shit when down in those days.

  45. Re: Considering knowingly publishing bad informati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was denied a home loan because of incorrect information on my credit report. It sucks that the law doesn't allow us to fight back.

  46. Because money is involved to unlock by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And how exactly does a freeze help, if the next credit bureau hack obtains all those freeze PINs?

    SSN's you can use in bulk. But even knowing a freeze PIN you still have to pay real money - either to unlock it temporarily, or for good. That makes it less likely attackers would make use of it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Because money is involved to unlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay to unlock one, get credit card with now stolen identity, use new credit card to pay to unlock more. You gotta spend money to make money.

    2. Re:Because money is involved to unlock by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      still have to pay real money

      If that's the case thieves would never buy stolen ID information. And yet they do.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Because money is involved to unlock by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Yes but if you've ever undone a credit freeze it takes some effort in addition to the money... and there are so many accounts leaked why would you bother to unfreeze an account even for $20 when you could simply move on to the next one which likely is not frozen??? Defense in depth means that any one point of defense being weak does not matter in the big picture because the layers make it more secure overall and thieves (being lazy) will not bother.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Because money is involved to unlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my state (if done online) freezing your credit report is free as is lifting the freeze.

  47. Identity Theft Does Not Exist ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Identity Theft is a fiction created in order to keep you as a subservient slave. There is no such thing. Your identity cannot be stolen!

    Someone may "impersonate" you and that may cause someone else to attempt to commit extortion against you.

    You need do nothing except be ready to respond in an appropriate manner to anyone who makes extortionist claims against you.

    1. Re:Identity Theft Does Not Exist ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is your whole philosophy based around mystical pedantry? Me speak big talk make magic words do double talk. Me clever clever.

  48. Re: Considering knowingly publishing bad informati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was denied a home loan because of incorrect information on my credit report. It sucks that the law doesn't allow us to fight back.

    You suffered a measurable loss. Too bad the law protects credit reporting agencies. We should be able to sue for that.

  49. Right to sue by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    Accepting Equifax's help forfeits your right to sue;

    Nope. New York's attorney general demanded they clarify the wording on this.

  50. Change the Headlines by vannoble · · Score: 1
    To quote a couple of different people who have said the similar thing:

    Stop reporting 143 million "customers" or "consumers" info was stolen. We are not their customers or consumers. We are their product and the victims.

  51. Roll the dice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Roll the dice. It's better than paying Danegeld to these guys to freeze your credit. Also, they want you to waive your right to class action. Hell no. I don't care if I don't get money from a CA. If CA lawyers can actually drive that PoS into BK, they deserve every cent they're paid. After that, we need to picket the appropriate government agencies; but fat chance of that actually working.

    So roll the bones. It's the only practical "solution" even though it's not a real solution. In the event that ID theft actually robs you of a significant amount, do your best to hang it on these guys, not your own fault. Sue them independently for that, not as a member of a CA; but hurry because there will be a long line.

    In an ideal world, the guys who sold their stock get perp walked and the company is shut down; but once again... fat chance. Come on, Trump, here's your chance to be Reaganeaque. Remember back then? Guys actually got perp walked. It hasn't happened in way too long a time.

  52. Easily bypassed by Solandri · · Score: 1

    The fraudster just calls up and says they forgot the PIN. The credit agency then asks him/her information which only you should know to confirm identity, then lifts the freeze or resets the PIN. Still, it is (or was) the best way to protect your credit. Unfortunately, the information they use to confirm your identity is probably what's been stolen in this hack. So whoever stole it can lift any freeze you put on your credit.

    1. Re:Easily bypassed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite how it works. They can't/won't give you a pin over the phone. They only mail it to one of your addresses they have on file.

  53. Keep any Equifax paperwork by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    When the class action suit is settled you may have to prove you used them, not them hunting you down.

    I have the results from Equifax I got from annualcreditreport.com as PDF's.

  54. Re: Considering knowingly publishing bad informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your roommate is part of the problem. They have never been held accountable for knowingly publishing bad information.

  55. Bring back the humans to business transactions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone can get a credit card in my name if they have a few pieces of information. What the fuck? You want to 'deal with' data breaches? Make the data worthless. Bring back HUMAN INTERACTION. To get a credit card issued in my name, make me go to a real bank and meet with a real human and show some real ID. Pretty fucking simple.

    1. Re:Bring back the humans to business transactions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You much smart, solve problem with big brain. Puny simpletons bow to great wisdom.

  56. Re: Considering knowingly publishing bad informati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Federal law protects them.

  57. I say we take off ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and nuke the entire site from orbit

  58. Re:Corps and Govt stop treating the SSN as a Secre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    complain about it to your CO and JAG and to your congresscritters.

  59. Corporate Death Penalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Void their business licenses, burn down the buildings, execute the executives

    1. Re: Corporate Death Penalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be a start

  60. Ban the credit reporting industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real data breach is that they're allowed to aggregate my info and that businesses I deal with send my info to them

  61. Two more words by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

    PROJECT MAYHEM

    Burn the company to the ground, tar-and-feather all the executives, secure-erase all their data. Nobody deserves the kind of power they have, and obviously can't control.

  62. what about sixwords by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    " Your loan application has been approved"

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:what about sixwords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about "what about"?

  63. seven words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither a borrower nor a lender be.

  64. Account hijack is a bigger threat by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Almost everyone says "freeze your credit". As though new credit lines are the only problem. Yes, it is atrocious fraudsters can use simple public info to steal identities. But this breach is worse.

    Fraudsters can assemble so much of data, call the bank, ask for password reset and hijack an existing account. Before you can call back and fix the issue the money would be gone.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  65. Change.Org petition for better PII regulations by Tora · · Score: 1

    The free market will not fix this situation because the people they collect the data on are unwilling customers for the credit reporting agencies. We have no choice to opt out let alone easily manage our data, and those who buy the credit scores (i.e. credit lenders) are not affected when there is a breach.

    Usually, I'm not a fan of regulation, but this might warrant such. Trying to get better congressional visibility with a new petition:

            https://www.change.org/p/rob-b...

    --
    tora
  66. 143 million people asking for new legislation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I put all my credit on credit freezes years ago. After numerous changes to Terms of Service which I did not have to agree to (because web site ..), the freezes were removed. The new terms allowed companies to charge me $10 or $15 for freezes with relatively short expiration dates.

    New legislation should forbid companies from charging for security freezes or thaws if less than 3 each in a one year period.
    New legislation should prohibit credit bureaus from including any arbitration or limits to sue for security breaches in their Terms of Service.
    New legislation should mandate that companies include databases of consumer information as liabilities, not assets.
    New legislation should require credit bureaus to have proof that all credit inquiries originated with a consumer request for credit, not indirect business opportunities (such as buying lists of consumers with x income, living in certain areas).
    New legislation should require credit bureaus to notify consumers whenever someone tries to access your credit file for any reason.
    New legislation should mandate that credit bureaus not pay any bonus and limit all compensation to any member of it's board of directors to no more than $100,000/year in any year in which a breach is discovered. That will force the boards to sit around and talk security until they get it done.

    Make it one piece of legislation called "The stop f'ing the consumer with credit dossiers we can market excessively law".

    1. Re:143 million people asking for new legislation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot one.

      The government buys information from lots of companies that would require a warrant for them to obtain directly themselves. Perhaps they buy lists of people who bought certain items or services on their credit cards.

      New legislation should also prohibit ALL private companies (and state agencies to the Federal government) from selling information to the government that would require a warrant to obtain directly. That might make more sense as part of a privacy bill than as part of credit reform but still needs to be done.

    2. Re:143 million people asking for new legislation by lcall · · Score: 1

      I wish I could see a way to mod this up, as well as its follow-up that suggests an additional law (in spite of the unfortunate profanity; maybe I don't have enough karma or am just blind to the feature at the moment or something). It seems an intelligent suggestion in the discussion toward realistic solutions.

      --
      A Free, fast personal organizer for touch typists: onemodel
  67. Perform 'Identity Theft' on yourself? by ShamblerBishop · · Score: 1

    Not that I'd advocate this but...now would probably be the absolute perfect time for people to find someone who can perform 'identity theft' on themselves, and max out their credit cards and other avenues of seeking loans, using the data released from this breach - and then stuff the banks with the cost of this.

  68. W in pounds, L in feet. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    The magic formula is L = 1,260 / W.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  69. Accepting help forfeits your right to sue by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    >> Accepting Equifax's help forfeits your right to sue

    I can't believe that this is true. It may say that in the agreement but I seriously doubt that it's actually legal.

    1. Re:Accepting help forfeits your right to sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's in a FREE MARKET country. You agree to it, it's a deal. None of this nanny-state "ooh, but he didn't understand it" or "but it wasn't equal bargaining power" government interference horseshit.
      --
      roman_mir

  70. SHUT THE SORRY FUCKERS DOWN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who looses that kind of data needs to go out of business... they are nothing but a NSA / FBI front any damn way

  71. Who owns peronal data anyhow? by hwstar · · Score: 1

    This question is key to resolving this and other issues with personal data hoarders.

    If personal data is owned by the person, then maybe it is copyrightable.

    If you own the copyright on your personal data, then you could conceivable issue a DMCA "Takedown Notice" to all the credit reporting agencies.

    This would wipe your credit file (Which has distinct disadvantages as you would no longer have a credit record). If you avoid financing things, then maybe
    this would work out just fine.

  72. Equifax must pay the price of the death penalty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a company in this business, and of this prominence fails so utterly and dramatically in this one task, there is absolutely no reason that company should be in business.

    It is the classic case of "You had one job to do.."

    As consumers the only sane approach is to utterly and completely boycott them.
    Tell your bank and other financial institutions:
    "If you continue to use Equifax, I am taking my business elsewhere"

  73. Lifetime Identity Theft protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need to provide, via a reputable third party, lifetime Identity theft protection for everyone who's data was exposed.
    I'd also hit them for a nice fine of say 10k to 25k paid out to each person who's data was exposed.

  74. Take away their toys. by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

    If Equifax was holding toxic waste, and they failed to keep it secure and some of it leaked into the environment, what would our response be?

    If they can't responsibly hold information secure, then take that information away from them.
    Force them to delete all data which was "breached" so they can't lose it again.
    If they're unsure what data was lost, then allow anyone to have "their" data deleted.

    Monitor the company to insure compliance.

  75. "since the PINs are hopefully hashed and salted" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "hopefully"? Fat chance!

  76. I'm.... by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    ...just going to do a fraud alert. Do it with one of the big 3 and they notify the others to do it. Simple.

  77. Let's put a fine point on this by sjames · · Score: 1

    "Identity theft" is a complete sham. When some third party convinces someone to loan them money in your name, they have committed fraud and the whoever handed them bags of cash without making sure they knew who they were dealing with is an idiot who cannot be trusted.

    Any attempt to collect the money from you is a second fraud since there exists no evidence you took the loan (because you didn't). If any credit agency accepts a negative statement about your credit worthiness from such an untrustworthy idiot and then reports it to others, they are committing libel. That is, they are reporting these things with a reckless disregard for the truth. That would include Equifax. They certainly should know by now that identity fraud happens all the time, especially since they just facilitated it in a big way.

    So, the town's most pernicious gossip has just helped the town's most pernicious frauds to make up new and better lies and as compensation offers to monitor their own pernicious gossip about you for up to a year before they start charging you money to fail to protect you from themselves and their two equally bad buddies.

    But only if you agree to not sue them after they stalked you for your entire adult life and then told everything they know to the most crooked people in town.

  78. I'm not affected :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're wrong. My bank or water bill is not tied to that jewy shit at all.

    I'm off the jew grid, unlike you slaves :)

  79. Things you CAN do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The breach is bad, and it is likely there will be more. It is estimated that hackers stole over $400 BILLION last year. That is a lot of money to fund more hacking, further we have nation states sponsoring hacking, so the level and sophistication of hacking will only increase. I recognize that the "credit monitoring" agencies are a farce, however, there are legitimate options for cyber INSURANCE. You need to do your homework but those agencies can provide protection similar to auto or home insurance. for more info... http://commonsensehome.com/tag/computer-security/

    Not trying to get you to buy anything - here is a pretty good list of what services are offered and if/how you can "DIY" the service. https://20somethingfinance.com/lifelock-review/

    Keep safe out there, it will get worse before it gets better.

  80. Re:Corps and Govt stop treating the SSN as a Secre by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Not supposed to. SSN is supposed to only be for the IRS. Says so in the charter. Virginia used to use the SSN for their drivers ID. They were forced to change when the Feds went after them. Same thing should be for all the medical stuff.

  81. Re:Corps and Govt stop treating the SSN as a Secre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are retired military get a new ID. They no longer have to use your SSN for any transactions including healthcare. I have a DoD ID number and a Benefits number for Tricare use on my ID card, no mention of a SSN. Had mine changed 3 years ago when my wife went to base to update her card.

  82. IRS Tax Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone is talking about credit card fraud & other banking issues. What about IRS tax fraud? Medical/insurance fraud? What other types of trouble can be caused with social security numbers and the rest of the info stolen? I think we need to be issued new social security numbers...

  83. Re:Corps and Govt stop treating the SSN as a Secre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it absolutely was a "secret".

    Initially, it was to be used for Social Security purposes and using it for any other business purpose was a violation of law.

    I suspect, those laws are still on the books. Just (as many other things), general laziness on the part of the public has made it another security failure of compromise.