Slashdot Mirror


GNOME 3.26 Released (betanews.com)

BrianFagioli shares a report from BetaNews: Today, GNOME 3.26 codenamed "Manchester" sees release. It is chock full of improvements, such as a much-needed refreshed settings menu, enhanced search, and color emoji! Yes, Linux users like using the silly symbols too! "System search has been improved for GNOME 3.26. Results have an updated layout which makes them easier to read and shows more items at once. Additionally, it's now possible to search for system actions, including power off, suspend, lock screen, log out, switch user and orientation lock. (Log out and switch user only appear if there's more than one user. Orientation lock is only available if the device supports automatic screen rotation.) These search features can be accessed in the usual way: click Activities and type into the search box, or simply press 'super' and start typing," says the GNOME Project. The full release notes are available here.

176 comments

  1. The main question is... by The123king · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does it have a rain screensaver? After all, it always rains in Manchester

    --
    If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    1. Re:The main question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it have a rain screensaver? After all, it always rains in Manchester

      That would be nice I would like one of those screensavers!
      When I was a little pixie we had a outhouse with a tin roof and when ever it rained it made a fantastic noise that I would go to sleep to.
      I have always been fond of listening to the rain ever since those days. as those times get further and further away they are becoming more and more pleasant probably more pleasant than they actually were. Only one regret I wished I did not kill so many ants pretending that a war was happening and I would burn them with a magnifying glass and pretend my finger was a machine gun and I would squash them bang bang bang all day long. You see I was pretending the ants were soldiers.

    2. Re:The main question is... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's named after the football/soccer team.

      They're alike in that the further you are from them the more likely you are to be a fan.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Named Manchester by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is the default theme dull and grey?

    1. Re:Named Manchester by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Even more importantly, can you cut trousers out of it?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Named Manchester by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Life in a northern town...

    3. Re:Named Manchester by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the default theme dull and grey?

      Our kid will set pitbull on yah in it.

    4. Re:Named Manchester by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      More importantly, can it play soccer?

    5. Re:Named Manchester by Snufu · · Score: 1

      Found a bug in the system time. Every day is like Sunday.

  3. Only one good thing ever came out of Manchester by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Only one good thing ever came our of Manchester

    And that's the M62 to bring you back to God's Own County

  4. Performance by sirber · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No word on performance? Gnome 3.24 is so slow on my i5 with HD 4000 on wayland and xfree.

    --
    Be or ben't
    1. Re:Performance by jaklode · · Score: 1

      Same as 3.22, never saw 3.24

    2. Re:Performance by sirber · · Score: 1

      Same as 3.22, never saw 3.24

      On Fedora 26: # dnf info gnome-shell Nom : gnome-shell Version : 3.24.3

      --
      Be or ben't
    3. Re:Performance by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1, Interesting

      X has always been slow as fuck. I'm really considering a hackintosh at this point. A nice BSD unix subsystem with fast graphics, what more could you ask for?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    4. Re:Performance by SurenEnfiajyan · · Score: 0

      Aren't they using Wayland?

    5. Re:Performance by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I'm really considering a hackintosh at this point. A nice BSD unix subsystem with fast graphics, what more could you ask for?

      A nice BSD unix system that wasn't frozen in time a decade ago, perhaps?

    6. Re:Performance by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      X has always been slow as fuck.

      He did say it was slow on Wayland too.

    7. Re:Performance by sirber · · Score: 1

      In fact it's slower on Wayland than X. The CPU usage is kinda high for the process gnome-shell. I get excellent speed on the same machine with KDE (compositor enabled)

      --
      Be or ben't
    8. Re:Performance by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Can you elaborate?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    9. Re:Performance by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Other than maintenance, what does Apple do with the NeXT OS that they plopped their GUI down on top of? Really, they mostly deprecate it over time.

    10. Re:Performance by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Yes, there has been some performance improvements this round. Hopefully next round we will focus on other performance and memory related issues.

    11. Re:Performance by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      They don't have to do anything with it. It works as intended. Why fix something that isn't broken?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    12. Re:Performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac OS X 10.5 worked as intended, then the iPhone came along and they lost interest in the Mac. Every version since then has been getting worse

  5. Colour emoji! by Gaygirlie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh wow, that's SUCH important improvement that I can hardly contain my excitement! It's okay that the rest of the desktop-environment sucks ass as long as I get my emojis!

    1. Re:Colour emoji! by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Get the new Applephone X and you can get shitfaced emoji.

    2. Re:Colour emoji! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really curious where emoji's even come to play in a desktop environment. I have *NEVER* seen one so far using gnome-shell.

    3. Re:Colour emoji! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, that's SUCH important improvement that I can hardly contain my excitement! It's okay that the rest of the desktop-environment sucks ass as long as I get my emojis!

      I know man. I just U+1F4A9'd myself in excitement.

    4. Re:Colour emoji! by antdude · · Score: 1

      I am waiting for animojis. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  6. why do i (still) have to search? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to reach common system settings, tasks and applications? it's so fucking non-productive and counter-intuitive, having to type that shit out just to find the shit, when the old click-click-done worked so well before.

    1. Re:why do i (still) have to search? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      to reach common system settings, tasks and applications? it's so fucking non-productive and counter-intuitive, having to type that shit out just to find the shit, when the old click-click-done worked so well before.

      Because you haven't added it to the dash panel?

    2. Re:why do i (still) have to search? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in which gnome is that? because in mine are pretty much in front of your face. And i've been using it for a while...

    3. Re:why do i (still) have to search? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      "Just search for common system settings, go into the settings section, click on dash panel configuration....."

  7. Hyperlinks in Terminal by egmont · · Score: 0

    GNOME Terminal introduced a new escape sequence that allows arbitrary text to become a hyperlink, pretty much like <a> tags on webpages. The same feature is also available in iTerm2's beta series as well as Tilix. Hope some of you will find it truly useful!
    As the first "official" tool to utilize this, coreutils-8.28 introduced "ls --hyperlinks". Filenames are linked to their corresponding "file://" URI, and ctrl+click conveniently opens them in their preferred graphical application.

    1. Re:Hyperlinks in Terminal by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Meanwhile, NeXTSTEP and derivatives (including OS X and GNUstep) have supported 'open {file}' to open it in your preferred graphical application ('open {directory}' to open a directory in the graphical file manager) since 1988.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Hyperlinks in Terminal by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      xdg-open

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Hyperlinks in Terminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GNOME Terminal introduced a new escape sequence that allows arbitrary text to become a hyperlink, pretty much like <a> tags on webpages. The same feature is also available in iTerm2's beta series as well as Tilix. Hope some of you will find it truly useful!
      As the first "official" tool to utilize this, coreutils-8.28 introduced "ls --hyperlinks". Filenames are linked to their corresponding "file://" URI, and ctrl+click conveniently opens them in their preferred graphical application.

      "GNOME Terminal introduced a new escape sequence that allows arbitrary text to become a hyperlink"?!?!?!

      "Hope some of you will find it truly useful!"

      ORLY?!?!?!

      If that's the first thing that you mention with this new release, that explains all the bloat and the mucking around with the interface, doesn't it?

      All those Gnome developers with nothing useful to do...

    4. Re:Hyperlinks in Terminal by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2

      Gnome terminal insists on setting TERM=xterm but does not generate the same sequences, eg it generates the wrong escape sequence for Shift-F1. There is a good description with TERM=gnome, but they refuse to use it. Why don't they just fix it to generate the right escape sequences ? Backwards compatibility ? - That can't be the reason: if the terminfo description is wrong then no one can be using it.

      Muppets

    5. Re:Hyperlinks in Terminal by egmont · · Score: 0

      Wrong escape sequence for Shift-F1? Yup that was fixed 3.5 years ago.

    6. Re:Hyperlinks in Terminal by egmont · · Score: 0

      Oh truly sorry for mentioning my favorite new feature in a comment rather than repeating the release notes, or trying to guess which one is the most useful to you.

    7. Re:Hyperlinks in Terminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh truly sorry for mentioning my favorite new feature in a comment rather than repeating the release notes, or trying to guess which one is the most useful to you.

      So your FAVORITE NEW FEATURE that you're compelled to brag about is that fucking mundane?

      Again: that explains all the bloat and the mucking around with the interface, doesn't it?

      This might help you here: first law of holes

    8. Re:Hyperlinks in Terminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gnome-open has existed for what seems like an eternity, although I do not believe it's in the default install.

    9. Re:Hyperlinks in Terminal by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      What is GNOME terminal? Is that what you type 'xterm&' into to get a terminal to open? What a waste of time.

      Wouldn't it be easier just to put an 'exec xterm&' line in my .fvwm2rc file? Or even better, put an 'xterm' line as the last line in my ~/.xinitrc file? (after the 'fvwm&' line, most likely)

    10. Re: Hyperlinks in Terminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XDG is a bastardization of a standard, and tools change your xdg config all the time. It's as opaque as Windows' file type associations, except stored in a million different places.

      FreeDesktop should disappear.

    11. Re: Hyperlinks in Terminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the love of iGNUcius, put a fucking space between your command and the ampersand.

  8. No surrender by pigsycyberbully · · Score: 1

    Makes me want to vomit. It is simply a mobile phone desktop.

    People would not use that in a work environment even I would prefer to use Windows 7 then to use that mobile phone desktop.
    Am I getting old? or are these people just fuck up.

    1. Re:No surrender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're just fucked up.

    2. Re:No surrender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're just following the (stupid) trend started by Windows 8 (and furthered by Win 10) of treating all UI using users as if using touchscreens.

      Do you use keyboard and mouse on a PC? Don't be a luddite and use our touchscreen optimized UI with its huge buttons, hamburger menus and in general huge amounts of whitespace. What? You think a traditional UI works better for you? You're just an out-of-touch old person.

      The worst part is that this crap would make (some) sense if many people used touchscreens on PCs but the vast majority don't. Even if they did, a traditional UI works better for mouse usage and if anything they should allow people to choose their preferred UI.

    3. Re:No surrender by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 is a wunnerful place for touchscreens.

      On my Asus Transformer Book, Windows 10 disabled the keyboard. Oh, it sometimes lets me type in a password to log into Windows, just to taunt me and make sure that I know it isn't a hardware problem.

      But after logging in, nope, the keyboard doesn't do anything. So I am just as grateful as all fuck that I can detatch the keyboard and use the 'Transformer' as a Windows 10 tablet.

      You don't want to try and track down problems like this on the forums for people with Transformer Books running Windows 10. I guess you could want that, if you have a lot of time to waste.

  9. Nobody cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go home gnome3

  10. Still a bag of unusable shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bring back the old gnome where everything was sensible and didn't try to re-invent itself *against* tried and tested UI layouts.

    All 3 did was take a massive shit on the UI and it's been shit ever since.

    1. Re:Still a bag of unusable shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Agreed

    2. Re:Still a bag of unusable shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I actually like Gnome3, it's fairly minimalist, and make the focus you're running programs instead of the UI itself. What I'm trying to say is, to me, Gnome3 make a good effort of getting out of your way and making your work/(workflow) the most important thing.

      I only cared about animated spinney 3D cubes to switch desktops or for screensavers, when I was young, more evangelistic and felt like I had something to prove vs the windows crowd. IE from roughly 97 to 2010. Now that linux is eating windows for lunch, I don't care about the bling. I want the Desktop to be minimal and get the F out of my way.

    3. Re:Still a bag of unusable shit by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2

      I have tried Gnome 3 several times, just too hard to use, the pager is broken (up/down only), no maximise button, hard to open a *new* terminal in a *new* window, ... I now run Mate, I find it intuitive and it works as I want.

    4. Re:Still a bag of unusable shit by Misagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I run Mate which is a clone of the more sensible GNOME 2. Mate is based on the GTK+ user interface toolkit.

      Unfortunately, development of the GTK+ toolkit was also taken over by the same idiots that "develop" GNOME 3.
      They have done things such as breaking the API on minor version number revisions, and added requirements to those of GNOME 3.
      They changed the tried and true behaviour of scrollbars and sliders to not paging when you click in the trough and which stops if you move the knob too slowly.
      They removed the way that submenus stay open longer if you move the mouse pointer towards it.
      Text has smooth - but delayed - scrolling that can't be sped up to instantaneous.
      I thought about writing a theme engine that patched the behaviour (which I did in the GTK+ 1.2 days) but they "deprecated" theme engines, so now I would have to fork the entire toolkit if I want to fix it.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    5. Re:Still a bag of unusable shit by caseih · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mate is now pretty much been ported to GTK+ 3, and they've managed to keep much of the look and feel that it had with GTK+ 2. So apparently most of what you dislike about Gnome 3's behavior must be tweakable in GTK+ already.

      GTK+ 3 themes can now be made much simpler than the old engine days. You can now do it with CSS to good effect. And there are GTK+ 3 versions of older themes like Clearlooks that look pretty good.

    6. Re:Still a bag of unusable shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should try Gnome2, it's exactly what you're describing, without all the confusion and reinvention of the wheel that is Gnome3.

    7. Re:Still a bag of unusable shit by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      You just described why I like fvwm2.

      Because the Tab Window Manager (twm), while a built in binary with basic X11, just wasn't enough.

    8. Re:Still a bag of unusable shit by Insightfill · · Score: 1

      That lack of submenus staying open was the the thing that got me off of Mate. I tried to like it, but I haven't been able to break the muscle memory of moving diagonally to a submenu and expecting it to stay open. XFCE under Xubuntu is working quite well for me right now.

    9. Re:Still a bag of unusable shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I switched to XFCE when that happened.

    10. Re:Still a bag of unusable shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had been using XFCE since Gnome3 was introduced, but wiped it for a clean install of MATE after upgrading to Debian 8 because trying to tweak Gtk2/3 differences was not worth it.
      XFCE's ALSA volume control widget was also removed with debian 8.

    11. Re:Still a bag of unusable shit by Misagon · · Score: 1

      The only thing that is tweakable is left-click for paging in scrollbars.
      The other things are not.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    12. Re:Still a bag of unusable shit by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Also, at this point, Xfce can do pretty much everything that Gnome 2 could - while still being more lightweight (dunno how it compares to MATE, but since that's a fork, presumably about the same).

  11. Can't Log Out? by Pikoro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Log out and switch user only appear if there's more than one user."

    Um, so I can't log out unless someone else is already logged in? How does someone else get a login prompt then? Stop removing shit!

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    1. Re:Can't Log Out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gnome v3 is the epitome of asinine. a case study of designing software san common sense.

    2. Re:Can't Log Out? by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      It probably means that there should be at least two linux users with uid >= 1000.

    3. Re:Can't Log Out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it is meant to be read as the machine have more than one user account on the machine ;)

    4. Re:Can't Log Out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably means that there should be at least two linux users with uid >= 1000.

      That'd still be ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY STOOOOPID, aka par for Gnome devs...

    5. Re:Can't Log Out? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been trying to figure out why all Linux desktops suck so much. I think it must be due to barriers to contributing.

      I looked at working on KDE, since it's the least bad one I found. They have a page that tells you to start by spending hours on IRC, hoping that helpful people are in your time-zone and suffering from the same level on insomnia as you are. The relevant section on their forum is dead, hardly anyone gets replies. They then start talking about how you should do all the boring, trivial bug fixing crap they can't be bothered with as a way to get started.

      Sod that. I want to fix the start menu, fix it opening slowly and sort out the half-baked Windows-clone layout. I'm an experienced programmer. The barriers are too high, KDE loses a potential improvement.

      GNOME is basically the same, their guide eventually just tells you to go on IRC and ask someone, and they don't seem interested in fixing the horrible mess they have created. In fact their current goal seems to be to remove as many options and alternative settings as possible.

      Maybe one of the other desktops is better. How long am I supposed to spend checking them? This is the kind of thing that keeps people on Windows, because the pain that Microsoft inflicts is not quite as bad as the average Linux desktop.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Can't Log Out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So for the use case of wanting to log out but not reboot because you want to leave some nohup process running in the background you will have to create a second user.

      That is if you already figured out why these processes keep getting killed at logout and stopped systemd from killing them. Of course then you get some processes that don't correctly quit on logout, which won't be fixed of course because that is not a problem in the default setting.

    7. Re:Can't Log Out? by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      I find MATE less bad than Gnome and KDE. Both used to suck less.

    8. Re:Can't Log Out? by juanfgs · · Score: 2

      , and they don't seem interested in fixing the horrible mess they have created. In fact their current goal seems to be to remove as many options and alternative settings as possible.

      Or perhaps they don't see it as an horrible mess and just disregard disrespectful people who come trying to impose their vision on them.

      Contributing is just that, just contributing, not pretending becoming the boss of a project at day one because you know better than everybody involved in it.

    9. Re:Can't Log Out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps they don't see it as an horrible mess

      all software is a mess, so people who don't see it that way are delusional

    10. Re:Can't Log Out? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously saying that everything post-Gnome 2 was an improvement? MATE seems to have the right idea.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Can't Log Out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. You can't log out or switch user if you don't have any other users created on your system. They don't have to be actively logged in.

    12. Re:Can't Log Out? by Saija · · Score: 1

      Yeah! recently I'm interested on trying to help KDE, which btw is my preferred desktop environment on Linux, by the way of coding.
      When I found that pages that you share which talks about going to IRC I said: WTF?

      They should have some basic guidance page where they tell you what its needed to make code contributions to KDE:

      • The tools needed
      • the way to grab the source code
      • the patching

      all of this explained to the different distros on which KDE works
      but going to a fsckn IRC is not a valid nor useful resource to the newbies trying to made some contributions

      --
      Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
    13. Re:Can't Log Out? by Pikoro · · Score: 1

      Well that's just stupid then. If I have a single user machine, I want to be able to log out, not just lock the screen. I don't want my credentials in use at all when I'm not sitting at my desk unless I launch a background process from a terminal. I still want to be able to leave the system at a login screen. Glad I don't use this crap, and won't be any time soon.

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    14. Re:Can't Log Out? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If it had that, plus maybe an overview of the architecture and how the source is organized, I'd probably contribute some code.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Can't Log Out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      none but a few lisp programmers write self-documenting, explorable code and so the barriers you describe are everywhere. hand-waving gets a few souls to write external wikis and fancier documentation which is out of date as soon as the next guy makes an effort to contribute, so you fragment and have just a few that could tell you what's relevant the rest is lost unless you do outstanding heroics to overcome a mess or complexities, side-effects and dependencies.

    16. Re:Can't Log Out? by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2

      >>Or perhaps they don't see it as an horrible mess and just disregard disrespectful people who come trying to impose their vision on them.

      You mean like the designer of SystemD?

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    17. Re:Can't Log Out? by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Try reading this page https://community.kde.org/Get_..., it seems to describe more what you want to do, you can communicate with IRC or mailing lists
      they suggest a few ways to get started "A good place to start is with a small bug or feature in an existing piece of software that affects you personally ("scratch your own itch"). "

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    18. Re:Can't Log Out? by Saija · · Score: 1

      Amen bro!
      That would be an amazing boost to the devs out there desperately trying to improve and lower the bug count of KDE ;)

      --
      Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
    19. Re:Can't Log Out? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Well where would you like to go if you run into issues or problems with the newcomers guide to ask questions? Most people start off with the applications that we have.

  12. Re:newsworthy? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's closer to "news for nerds" than 99% of the rest this site offers these days, be happy with what little you get.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  13. More pointless moving things about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why can't all these UI idiots face facts. The desktop was perfectly usable two decades ago.

    All they've done since then is continually waste time reinventing the wheel. And each time it gets worse, less usable, and more of a complete PITA to get your actual work done.

    Only 5 year olds are impressed by whirring, popping up, animated things. If there's a working file manager, a way to adjust settings, and a way to launch programs easily then your job is done ! Now go and do somethng USEFUL with your time. Wtite some decent APPLICATIONS.

    But no. These retarded clowns will spend the rest of eternity chaging pixel shading, dumbing things down and genrally pissing off what used to be their users. This week we've made the file manager circular with green icons... two months later..... now we've made the file manager triangular with all new pink icons.... two months later... now the file manager is oval with yellow icons... Rinse and repeat until the end of time.

    I hope GNOME dies in a fire.

    1. Re:More pointless moving things about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...

      I hope GNOME dies in a fire.

      What did fire ever do to you?

    2. Re:More pointless moving things about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      completely agree, Gnome devs are fucking retarding shitted clown cunts and totally fucked cunts.

    3. Re:More pointless moving things about by rjforster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You forgot to mention making the invisible border a little bit bigger. You know, the thing that breaks the fundamental point of mouse driven GUIs: if I can see it I can click it.
      Try getting two file manager windows and place them with a small but visible gap between them. Place another window, say a terminal in the middle and click both file managers to raise them over the top of the terminal. Now you can see the terminal in between the two file manager windows. But can you click on it, expecting it to raise to the top? No! Fricking invisible borders!
      (If you can click on the terminal, make the gap smaller and try again).

    4. Re:More pointless moving things about by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

      Why can't all these UI idiots face facts. The desktop was perfectly usable two decades ago.

      With the current hardware, the desktop UI problem was solved over two decades ago. These clowns are just reinventing the wheel, and doing a very poor job of it.

    5. Re:More pointless moving things about by Tranzistors · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Did you attend the last GUADEC?

      The desktop was perfectly usable two decades ago.

      GNOME devs felt the same way, until the Sun Microsystems conducted the usability study of GNOME in 2000. It was not useable, it was a confusing mess. Who do you think the GNOME people are going to believe, some AC on slashdot or actual usability studies? If you in particular prefer different desktop environment, good for you, there are others out there.

      Only 5 year olds are impressed by whirring, popping up, animated things.

      A rather informative presentation on this subject was given in GUADEC by Jakub Steiner, about how animations improve usability.

      As for the rest of your rant. I hope you find another desktop that fits your needs. Why you want other people to fail, if they don't serve you for free, is beyond me.

    6. Re:More pointless moving things about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This annoys the fuck out of me to no end. Know what else does? I use dark theme and white on black terminal. Since there is zero border if I have multiple terminal windows up sometimes my eyes cannot even tell where the individual panes are, it's just a mishmash of blended overlaying terminal windows. It almost hurts sometimes when my brain decides a window ends in one column, then I click to raise it and nothing happens...then I shift the window contents and my brain realigns the invisible border so now it assigns the correct delimitation and all of a sudden I see the full contents. It's sometimes feels like one of those old magic pattern posters.

    7. Re:More pointless moving things about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you attend the last GUADEC?

      The desktop was perfectly usable two decades ago.

      GNOME devs felt the same way, until the Sun Microsystems conducted the usability study of GNOME in 2000...

      You're fucking kidding me?!?!?

      You're using a study done before Y2K when Bill Clinton was President to justify what Gnome is doing with the GUI today?

      It was not useable, it was a confusing mess. ...

      You'd think 85+% of two fucking decades would be enough to fix that, no?

      [P]lus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

    8. Re:More pointless moving things about by Myrdos · · Score: 1

      Only 5 year olds are impressed by whirring, popping up, animated things.

      Oh, how I wish that were true. I mean, just look at the Game of Thrones intro and tell me you aren't impressed. If only we could keep our simple fascination from interfering with practical life. Alas! The fidget spinner is proof that we can't.

    9. Re:More pointless moving things about by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 2

      YES! What's with invisible borders? And those f$cking 1px borders in xfce while we're at it.

      --
      dinner: it's what's for beer
    10. Re:More pointless moving things about by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Only 5 year olds are impressed by whirring, popping up, animated things.

      Well, I like them too. The problem is when they get in the way of actual functionality. "Form follows function," attractiveness is lesser than getting stuff done.

      Priorities are important.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re:More pointless moving things about by caseih · · Score: 1

      I guess it all depends on your audience. To most slashdotters of my generation (I must be old), the desktop as it was in Gnome or Windows 20 years ago was indeed completely usable as it was what we were used to (they *learned* it, regardless of how unintuitive it was). Gnome devs seem to be chasing some mythical new user, but I'm not convinced this new user exists. So instead of catering to their actual base--you know the people who actually use Linux--they are alienating their base in a hopes of appealing to, well I'm not sure who exactly. It's very demoralizing, honestly.

      To me, I don't think those animated transitions they are so excited about add much to my experience. Most of them I would disable if given a chance. Not saying they are a complete waste but rather I just don't think they are that important to me personally as a user. They may indeed be useful for new users if they really exist. After watching that video I'm not at all sure what to feel. Is it exciting new stuff or is it a harbinger of even more disfunction to come? I have no idea. Android has seemed to use animations to good effect (and iOS) so maybe it's the future. Not because it's awesome but because it's what people have learned.

    12. Re:More pointless moving things about by Tranzistors · · Score: 1

      You're using a study done before Y2K

      I was responding to the specific claim, and I quote, “The desktop was perfectly usable two decades ago.”, the Y2K was about two decades ago. 18 years to be precise.

    13. Re:More pointless moving things about by GoingDown · · Score: 1

      You're fucking kidding me?!?!?

      You're using a study done before Y2K when Bill Clinton was President to justify what Gnome is doing with the GUI today?

      It was not useable, it was a confusing mess. ...

      It was response to earlier post which said that desktop was perfectly usable two decades ago. That study points out that no, it was not perfectly usable back then.

    14. Re:More pointless moving things about by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The desktop was perfectly usable two decades ago.

      Facts? The desktop was a disaster for new users 2 decades ago requiring a lot of learning. The changes in the UI over the past 2 decades has been a big contributor to the general and widespread acceptance of computers.

      Your fact is backwards, the desktop of *now* is *not* usable for advanced powerusers.

    15. Re:More pointless moving things about by Tranzistors · · Score: 1

      To most slashdotters of my generation (I must be old), the desktop as it was in Gnome or Windows 20 years ago was indeed completely usable

      Indeed. I was converted to Linux in 2007 and I felt it was great. The first doubt I had was when I installed it on computers of friends and saw them trying to use it. When I installed it in classroom setting at work, I saw it get broken on sooo many ways it hurt. The GNOME 3.0 was not ready, but it addressed every single problem I had with GNOME 2.x and this is why I loved it then and love it now. Sure, it may be dumbed down and missing that one cool feature, but if it means my friends and clients are not left with completely shattered desktop by turning on the wrong setting, that is a sacrifice I'm willing to take.

      I just don't think [animations] are that important to me personally as a user.

      The animation where app icons flow out of the grid icon might be superfluous, but the rest are helpful even for veterans. Another anecdote — in the game XCOM scrolling with mouse wheel is not animated, which made it so disorientating I switched to using scroll bar exclusivity. I just hope GNOME has enough resources to test the usability of the proposed animations, since animations have a fixed costs (user and GPU time), but benefits might or might not be there.

    16. Re:More pointless moving things about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And those f$cking 1px borders in xfce while we're at it.

      Open 'Windows Manager' in 'Settings Manager'. Select something like "Galaxy" as the style.

    17. Re:More pointless moving things about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you about those 1 px borders...that's nuts.

    18. Re: More pointless moving things about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These UX folk clearly don't use their own interfaces, or do things that are so mundane that just about any UI will do.

      Worse, UI "experts" have no real science to back their designs with, and assume it's possible to create one UI for all people.

      It can hardly be called a legitimate field of study, or even science, when they do no proper research and don't take power users into account.

      I've never seen a UX 'expert' who was capable of writing good software.

    19. Re:More pointless moving things about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The desktop was perfectly usable two decades ago.

      Got news for ya, GNOME isn't targeting just the desktop. They want the damn thing to run on phones, which is where most of the suckitude comes from.

    20. Re:More pointless moving things about by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Thanks for insulting all of us. You're welcome to use whatever you want, although I have no idea why they would accept you with such a caustic personality.

    21. Re:More pointless moving things about by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Thanks for trying for helping. You're life will be a lot pleasanter not engaging with people with such caustic oniine personality. There is nothing we have done that would generate this level of vitriol. It's just a desktop. Sheesh.

    22. Re:More pointless moving things about by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      I'm probably as old as you. You'e used to a particular paradigm and see no point in the change. But younger generations are growing up on touch screens and cell phones. If we stayed with the old paradigm, the only users we have will be you. The mission is to spread free software, and that means moving with the times to attract the next generation of software consumers. Are you a cumudgeon about your cell phone or tablet? Kindle?

      No input devices are coming like touch screens that we do support, and should support. They all create new ways to interact with the computer. Staying with what it was in 20 years is a good way to become irrelevant.

    23. Re:More pointless moving things about by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      GNOME can't run on phones.. it is a completely different UI. This comes from complete ignorance of someone who has never run GNOME but is simply prejudiced from just looking at it. It is a very keyboard driven interface.

    24. Re:More pointless moving things about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usability studies got us Windows 8, among other things. And other horrors.

      I'm a commercial software developer. I have personally witnessed up close how "UX experts" come and fuck things up. Every single fucking time, the entire product team would tell them that users will hate it. Every single fucking time they'd tell us that they have studies involving actual users, with some bullshit numbers like "80% liked the new thing". And every single fucking time, once the first public version was out, it happened exactly as the developers said it would - massive pushback from the users. One of those times, UX tried doubling down, and made a couple condescending blog posts that more or less told us our customers how they're all just a bunch of cavemen morons who don't understand and don't appreciate all the good things being done for them, and if they'd just shut up and re-learn the new tricks they'd know it. That one went about as well as you'd expect. Meanwhile, the devs responsible for implementing this "feature" figured out that this isn't going to end well, and snuck in an undocumented registry key that reverted some of the most blatant and onerous stuff - and then carefully leaked it.

      The offended UXers had to back off somewhat, but still managed to cram a bunch of their things in the final release. It took two more major releases of the product to basically undo what they have done; and every time we'd announce one of those stupid little things reversed, even if that was buried somewhere in a changelog, or only visible if you look at a screenshot closely, the users cheered. Oh,, and that undocumented registry key became one of the most popular settings applied to the product by end users, so much so that it became documented and got a checkbox in the next release.

    25. Re:More pointless moving things about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A touch interface is tits-on-a-bull for a desktop computer, and woefully inefficient for anything other than passive media consumption. Apple never really made that mistake with OSX, and even Microsoft are reversing course and slowly restoring the primacy of the WIMP interface with each major W10 update. The crowd-following Gnome devs are probably only about half a decade away from making the same realization.

    26. Re:More pointless moving things about by efitton · · Score: 1

      Former students of mine put Linux back on my machines. None of them use Gnome. (I was specifically warned off of Gnome). Most use Cinnamon. Now they were all introduced to Linux from the same teacher so maybe that has something (everything) to do with it. But do you have ANY evidence that young people like the Gnome interface more than other interfaces? My anecdotal evidence is that they strongly dislike Gnome. But hey, lets change break everybody's workflows every release and then claim we are doing it to attract the kids.

    27. Re:More pointless moving things about by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      I don't have evidence per se, but children who grew up never being exposed to the windows interface would readily pick up the GNOME interface given its design that is similar to webapps.

    28. Re:More pointless moving things about by efitton · · Score: 1

      Aren't you the one who always says that it isn't a tablet interface? Isn't that a direct contradiction to what you claim here?

      How many people do you think are going to pick up a GNOME desktop without having been exposed to a Windows interface first? Who is going to show them Gnome? The disaffected Linux user who is now on MATE?

      PS: My crappy anecdote trumps your unsubstantiated claim.

    29. Re:More pointless moving things about by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Please note that I referred to webapps not a tablet. And yes, I have said that GNOME is not a tablet and what I said does not contradict what I said. If you go to amazon's website, you can see the same visual elements like popovers being used. These days, webapps are popular making the OS immaterial. If you spend all your time in browsers then who cares what OS you use? In which case, you might as well use Linux and not have to pay the OS tax. There are companies like Dell, ZaReason and System76 that include Linux in their build and you can go from there.

    30. Re:More pointless moving things about by efitton · · Score: 1

      Probably true that webapps are beginning to dominate. Which might mean we've already lost. Google Docs isn't exactly free software.

      And given how low the price is for the OS tax anymore, it has really gotten hard to recommend Linux give the state of the desktop.

    31. Re:More pointless moving things about by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      The difference of course is that those other desktops probably wont respect your privacy as much as a Free desktop would. The inflection point comes when they realize that they can become part of a community instead of just a consumer. Granted our community could use some work, but diversity will be good for all of us. The other thing is that once you are in the Linux realm, as you become better acquainted, you can jump desktops and go somewhere else.

    32. Re:More pointless moving things about by efitton · · Score: 1

      Diversity in the community would be great. I like GNOME's Women Outreach program (too bad none of it becomes usable by those of us who won't use GNOME). But when three people seemingly dictate the entire direction of GNOME shell and happily break workflows whenever they think something "looks ugly" I'm less than thrilled and I am not actually seeing diversity. I remember reading the mailing list for input for different Asian languages and being appalled. Both because GNOME's guiding decision on input seemed based on the fact that the chosen developer was a drinking buddy of Alan Days' (meritocracy?); it was also the monolinguist English speaker who tried to shut down the conversation because he knew better as a programmer.

      So I would love to lock down my Aunt's and Grandmother's computers. GNOME is out; they both need apps on their desktop and the computer to function exactly the way the are use to or they simply can't use it. I'd love to have a Linux desktop at work. We have some Redhat server boxes because docker and python is pretty damn cool. But it's a Windows shop / financial type company and pretty conservative. So we ssh in and X probably isn't anywhere in the company. And none of us Linux users will make a peep about Linux on the desktop; it just isn't feasible given defaults. Most of us (one exception) would rather be on Windows than on GNOME and we aren't going to have root to install our own desktops. And when we do talk to a technical person about getting them on Linux at home we invariable suggest Mint and Cinnamon or MATE.

      So there is the frustration. Linux is losing ground on the Desktop. GNOME is chasing a class of user I don't see existing (technical enough to know about Linux and GNOME Shell but somehow has never experienced a traditional desktop). And lets not pretend that you have youth appeal; my experience (former teacher, 10 years) with high school students was a distinct lack of enthusiasm for GNOME.

      So yeah, I can get by with alternative desktops. But I certainly don't proselytize for Linux anymore. "Here is a desktop I dislike, you should try it." - not exactly a selling point. "Or you pretty much should stick with this one distribution because the desktop that is most usable is a little too tightly tied to how they release their software."

  14. Don't get the Gnome hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    This thread will now be full of people with fuck all else to do with their lives who want a window manager/DE they can just tweak all day long. Meanwhile, Gnome is great for those of us who actually work on their computers. It makes it simple and quick to open/switch apps and stays out the way the rest of the time.

    Seriously, guys, there's a whole world of window managers you can play with. Let's have *one* for the workers.

    1. Re:Don't get the Gnome hate by Gavagai80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It sure is bloated for a desktop whose selling point is being simple and featureless and uncustomizable. At any rate, the problem is that we remember when GNOME was more powerful -- version 1.4, nearly 20 years ago.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Don't get the Gnome hate by Gaygirlie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Meh. I like clean and uncluttered UIs that don't require much (if any) tweaking myself, but GNOME 3.x-series is just terrible in how clunky they've made it and how much useful stuff they've removed from it. Personally, Cinnamon is my current favourite, though it's terribly buggy and not well-supported at all under either Ubuntu or Debian. KDE is way too far into the "everything and the kitchen sink" - mentality, GNOME is way too far into the "back to the stone-ages," and I just find myself wishing Cinnamon got more love than it does now.

      Then again, Linux on the desktop sucks in general, like e.g. I just found out that neither Chromium or Firefox, for example, still support H/W-accelerated playback of video -- this has been on the TODO-list for a decade already. Something like that affects battery-life on portable devices and can make all the difference between whether one can play higher-resolution Youtube-videos or not on a budget-laptop, for example.

    3. Re:Don't get the Gnome hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who "actually work" use hotkeys for everything and avoid touching a mouse.

      If an UI can't be used efficiently with only keys then it is unusable for work. Graphics, colours, animations, windows in an UI are bullshit unless your job requires them.

    4. Re:Don't get the Gnome hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define bloated.

      I think most of you guys are confounding GNOME itself with out it is deployed by the different distributions.

    5. Re:Don't get the Gnome hate by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I just found out that neither Chromium or Firefox, for example, still support H/W-accelerated playback of video -- this has been on the TODO-list for a decade already. Something like that affects battery-life on portable devices and can make all the difference between whether one can play higher-resolution Youtube-videos or not on a budget-laptop, for example.

      Gee, I was wondering why I couldn't watch fullscreen video on my antique single-core netbooks.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Don't get the Gnome hate by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      Simple? Sure. The default screen is uncluttered, there aren't a lot of right-click or modifier-click actions by default.

      Featureless? Arguable. KDE lets you customize everything down to the pixel. I prefer having the one selector for a theme in Gnome (via Gnome Tweak) to trying to remember the 2-3 places in KDE to change the overall look/feel. Why do I need to remember to change where I go to switch window colors, window borders, desktop theme (which only changes the panel and menu), and more just to give my desktop a new theme?

      Uncustomizable? Look at the plugins. Vanilla Gnome 3 is pretty unusable for a power user... but for a non-techie, its pretty damn close to Mac OS usable in its simplicity. For power users, there's always the plugins to get the old-style start menu, assorted taskbar entries, change window behavior, add/remove taskbars, add a fully customizable dock, and so on.

      Powerful? 20 years ago Gnome was a mess too. I still have a hard time divining what the difference is between Applications->System Tools and System->Administration. At least in Windows 95 there was "Control Panel" (to say nothing of Windows 10's mess of configuration windows)

      Compared to 20 years ago, EVERY UI is bloated. Windows 95 came on a CD and could be installed (with some work) in 200 MB. Windows 7 comes along at 50 GB, Windows 10 is about the same. My Ubuntu Gnome install sits somewhere around 8GB with dev software installed. Computers have changed a lot in 20 years - we've gone from 600 MHz Pentiums to 4.2 GHz 8-core desktops.

    7. Re:Don't get the Gnome hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Removing features, yet the install size grows. Bloated.

  15. Now with even more bloat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's too fat to jump the shark!

  16. Does semaphores now work in window menu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, the underlines showing the hotkeys in the alt+space window menu? Do they work again?

    And why did you break them in the first place? Linux already is sucking in basic functionality like a clipboard that should work in _ALL_ programs. The partly missing semaphores are yet another basic feature.

  17. GNOME: the cancer of GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like RedHat, the other cancer.

    1. Re:GNOME: the cancer of GNU/Linux by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Not Cancer: it was born on the 3rd of March 1999, so it is an Aries. And Redhat were born as a public company on 11th of August 1999, so again not Cancer, but Leo.

    2. Re:GNOME: the cancer of GNU/Linux by afranke · · Score: 1

      GNOME was born on August 15 1997.

  18. Get a life, pleople... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nothing useful to do rather than post nonsense (like the system menu above... wtf?!). Don't like it, use something different. Stop being lazy and get on with your lives.

  19. colour emojis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So there's time for this shit but no time for a decent file manager ?

    1. Re:colour emojis by deviated_prevert · · Score: 2

      So there's time for this shit but no time for a decent file manager ?

      They have been trying to clone MS explorer in gtk for ever but can't quite get it to do anything useful. That is why systemd was born so that changing settings would be more like doing a regedit in gnome land instead of just a simple text edit in a config file. You see we all have to come to understand that obfuscation is how to make things more stable by making us uncircumcised sysv addicts shut up and stop configuring things the way we want them to work. Now everything has to be hidden in a parsed encoded file whose location is changed regularly by those who do not want everyone else easily learning how to configure their interface.

      By constantly changing the names of targets and moving things around the level of obfuscation ensures that only the interface coders at Red Hat can work on gnome. Precisely the reason why Patrick dropped a the gnome desktop from Slackware years before systemd sealed the fate for most Linux users. For years the cross dependency to run things broke so much that he gave up trying to release a preconfigured Gnome desktop install.

      --
      This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    2. Re:colour emojis by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      The people who worked on this is a font expert and the GTK+ maintainer. The nautilus maintainer was not involved, he was, working on nautilus. Developer time is not fungible. The font guy cannot turn around and work on nautilus. He works fonts and he provided a capability that we accepted.

  20. WindowMaker+SpaceFM or E17.3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    .3 being the last version with a bunch of the configuration settings I use. Depending on your OGL libraries/running compositing it can be a leaky fucker though.

    WindowMaker on the other hand is still basically the same as when I used it in 1997 on Slackware 3.0. The three big differences being the visible task switcher when alt-tabbing, the dynamic menu support (was still static back in those days), and the truetype font support (originally supported only bitmaped/type 1 fonts until freetype was safe/reliable to use.)

    I generally use e17 on my gaming system since it provides an integrated frame rate meter when compositing is enabled, and WindowMaker everywhere else. WM is pretty good about recovering if the window manager crashes, and restoring windows more or less to the same positions they were before the crash. E17 isn't quite as good about that, although most of the time it does as well.

    Having said that: No full DE has offered benefits over those two WMs in a good 10 years. About the only control panel feature that makes a full DE worth is is the lm-sensors plugins so you can monitor a half dozen temperatures at the same time. Other than that, it is all fluff and bloat eroding the usability and performance of my system.

    Maybe once machine learning gets good enough there will be other benefits to all that candy, in the form of extra intelligent search capabilities or what have you, but at the moment it seems to mostly be a circle jerk for SJW/UI design types and usability experts who wouldnt' know usability if you stabled it to their yuppie/hipster asses.

  21. Umh, so like, what's it do? by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I mean, for people that want to code, or browse or watch a film, maybe do some multitasking why choose GNOME over anything else?

    Is it easy to use and customise? Is it fast? Is it stable? Does it need a fuckton of dependencies and forces unnecessary shit on users?

    System search?! Emoji?? - what the fuck are these people doing?

    Once upon a time GNOME was clean, fast and simply didnt get in the way of doing shit. KDE was a slower but was very shiny. These days they both suck.

    If I wanted a horrifically bloated "flat" interface with seven layers of buried shit menus I'd just use Windows 10.

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    1. Re:Umh, so like, what's it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No point complaining, the Gnome devs are fucking useless and have destroyed a working desktop.
      I've dropped Debian because of Gnome 3 and gone back to my early love Slackware. It ain't as polished as some other distros but it fucking works. That or Free BSD.
      My greatest fear is that GIMP will turn to shit (no jokes here please) with the planned upgrade to Gnome 3. Gnome 3 is like that other software project (from Redhat) that's gangrening the linux ecosystem.

    2. Re:Umh, so like, what's it do? by juanfgs · · Score: 1

      I mean, for people that want to code, or browse or watch a film, maybe do some multitasking why choose GNOME over anything else?

      Because it's easier to set up, doesn't get in the way, can be used easily with a keyboard.

      Is it easy to use and customise? Is it fast? Is it stable? Does it need a fuckton of dependencies and forces unnecessary shit on users?

      - Yes is easy to use, my in-law uses it when she uses my brother's computer and finds it really intuitive.

      - If you have good hardware is fast, otherwise you have a plethora of other DEs to use, including the previous version of GNOME now known as Mate.

      - Pretty stable on both my desktop and laptop. In fact it has the best support for multiple monitors that I've seen on Linux so far.

      - Well define unnecessary, if it's needed by the desktop to run, then it's not unnecessary. Yes you can go minimal with other WM, but you also lose quite a lot of features that Gnome brings: easy software installation, power management, fast file/program/document search, calendar integration and more. If you don't feel like you need any of that, well use another thing, or use Gnome and disable those features, it's easily doable from their control panel.

      System search?! Emoji?? - what the fuck are these people doing?

      - The whole desktop focus around searching and it does a pretty good job at it, you basically press the super key, type something and open up the program/file you want, or write the mail for any contact you have. If you don't like that, well, don't use it, nobody is forcing you.

      - Emoji is quite frivolous but very popular nowadays, not everything has to be "super serious" and if someone contributed that to the project, who am I to criticize.

      - Well they are developing a popular Linux DE, they could also be ranting about other people's work on the internet.

      Once upon a time GNOME was clean, fast and simply didnt get in the way of doing shit. KDE was a slower but was very shiny. These days they both suck.

      Then use Mate which is literally the GNOME2 desktop you miss or KDE, or install a shiny theme, at this point I don't even know what you want.

      If I wanted a horrifically bloated "flat" interface with seven layers of buried shit menus I'd just use Windows 10.

      - Gnome interface is hardly flat, there are flat themes, the default one is not. I'm suspecting you're just full of shit and never even used the damn thing.

      - It seems you're looking for an excuse, just go and use Windows 10, nobody cares.

    3. Re:Umh, so like, what's it do? by juanfgs · · Score: 2

      I've dropped Debian because of Gnome 3

      You've dropped a Linux distribution that lets you choose the desktop at installation because you didn't like the desktop they ticked by default? You're clearly not the sharpest tool in the shed.

    4. Re:Umh, so like, what's it do? by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1


      So far the excuses come from you. You seem annoyed that I don't like GNOME and KDE in their current forms.

      I think GNOME has to decide what its for. This unfocused messing with the UI shit is just that. Shit.

      When you have to market your greatest release with updated emoji you know you got nothing. You say it's popular and not everything has to be serious...look here, linux desktop market share has NOTHING to do with popular. So the popular bit, while harmless is not a selling point.

      I actually do use Mate. It works. I had to use it because GNOME 3's "Gnome 3 Failed to Load" fucking messages drove me and many users mad.

      After the involved headache to get Gnome 3 to actually load you know what? it wasn't any fucking better! What was the point!?

      I know I know, "You don't like it no one is forcing you to use it" blah blah blah. If you don't like what I say, no one is forcing you to read it.

      --
      A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    5. Re:Umh, so like, what's it do? by juanfgs · · Score: 1

      When you have to market your greatest release with updated emoji you know you got nothing.

      No, I just answered your questions. That's why questions are made for, for answers. I found it funny how someone can be so angry at other people working on something.

    6. Re:Umh, so like, what's it do? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Some people have some irrational principles.

    7. Re:Umh, so like, what's it do? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      yet, we made the other thing he likes. Same people, made the first iteration. Of course, this is why they are angry, because we apparently took this great thing they loved so much and turned into something they didn't like. Even though there is an alternative, slandering is still an easy thing to do on the internet especially on a group of people giving away their work and not getting paid.

    8. Re:Umh, so like, what's it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's more like, "Some people have standards."

  22. One that doesn't suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all Linux desktops suck

    Ever heard of xfce? Spoiler alert: it doesn't suck.

    1. Re:One that doesn't suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XFCE? But what the hell happened to that between 3 and 4? Sorry, sticking to FVWM2 with a moderately altered rc from Slackware. Been years now, still cuts to the chase.

    2. Re:One that doesn't suck by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What happened is that it stopped being a CDE clone, and decided to just be a sensible generic DE - a goal that it has achieved.

  23. Dear Miguel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We miss you so much!

    With admiration, a former GNOME user.

    1. Re:Dear Miguel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at Xamarin, I don't miss him, and am glad he left for good.

  24. Good ol' Gnome 3 by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 2

    After all these years, the only thing that has ever made me question my decision to have a Linux desktop is Gnome 3. Had it been the case that Gnome 3 was the only desktop for Linux I would probably have stopped using Linux in the desktop altogether - even Windows seems to be an attractive option, in comparison (almost, not quite). Fortunately, we do not have to eat that dog food.

  25. Screw that, I'm using i3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i3 rules

    1. Re:Screw that, I'm using i3 by ponraul · · Score: 1

      agree. have a config that makes the keypad numbers different virtual desktops and use those on my right side monitor and the numbers on the top of the keyboard as the displays for my left monitor.

  26. Sublime 3 released. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No love?

  27. XFCE FOR TEH WIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, Gnome, MATE, Cinnabunz or whatever.. you can all suck it cause XFCE is the best!

  28. Manchester by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It only deserves the name if it's gobby, egotistical and hates scousers. It should also be called Liam.

    1. Re:Manchester by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 1

      Is it managed by a grumpy Portuguese guy, though?

      --
      dinner: it's what's for beer
  29. They removed the status icons tray? by jfjuneau · · Score: 1

    "GNOME 3.26 no longer shows status icons in the bottom-left of the screen. This prevents the status icon tray from getting in the way and is expected to provide a better overall experience." The status icon tray was not in the way at all, it was hidden in the lower left corner of the screen. And since the applications that uses the tray will assume that the tray is still there, I'm guessing that they will continue to run in the background without the user knowing?

  30. Gnome 3.26 removes the Status Bar/System Tray by iive · · Score: 1

    According to Gnome developers, removing of the system tray is so insignificant, that it is not even worth mentioning in the short list of changes. It is mentioned at the end of the long list, outside of the bullet points.

    GNOME 3.26 no longer shows status icons in the bottom-left of the screen. This prevents the status icon tray from getting in the way and is expected to provide a better overall experience. The lack of status icons is not expected to cause serious issues for users. However, if you do find that you need to access them, they can be restored using the TopIcons extension. More information about this change can be found in a blog post on the subject.

    This means that if you don't have the latest TopIcons extension already installed, a lot of programs that minimize to Status Bar will become inaccessible. That's mainly non-Gnome programs.

    Gnome developers are trying to force application developers to not use the "pretty old" standard that "predated Gnome 2.0" and instead to use Gnome specific API's like their notification.

    The big problem is that they do not seem to understand what is the purpose of the Status Bar, how people use it and why it exists in all Desktop platforms - Linux, Windows and Mac.
    The Status Bar is for checking the status of an application, with single glance, without need for any actions from the user, like moving mouse to specific position on the screen, having to click, switch desktops or open the program window.
    In comparison, notification are for signaling change or event. Their use is not only different, they also could be quite annoying and actively ignored.

    Here are few more links to read:
    https://blogs.gnome.org/aday/2017/08/31/status-icons-and-gnome/
    https://lwn.net/Articles/732622/

  31. Live GNU or try dying by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 1

    I only use GNOME because KDE uses the nonfree Qt widget set.

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:Live GNU or try dying by SurenEnfiajyan · · Score: 0

      It was an issue until 1998. That's why GNOME was created. But now GNOME/GTK+ are redundant.

    2. Re:Live GNU or try dying by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 1

      BTW, did they ever kill WIPO and the DMCA? Senator Dick Lugar won't answer my letters.

      --
      dinner: it's what's for beer
  32. Re:newsworthy? by afranke · · Score: 1

    It happened yesterday.

  33. Today I Learned by mea2214 · · Score: 1

    People still use Gnome.

  34. Color emoji! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    Truly, it is a new era.

  35. Understanding GNOME hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think I could summarize it better than this: GNOME (et al): Rotting In Threes

  36. I pine for the days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when I relished the thought of a Gnome release because it meant something good was coming.

    emojis? Gimme a break. If all you want is eye-candy, nothing ever surpassed enlightenment window manager.

  37. Does anyone know how to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    change basic settings such as where the volume pop-up appears and for how long. That would have been trivial to change and well-documented in older window managers, but it sure as hell isn't in gnome.

  38. Looks like nothing's changed by sremick · · Score: 1

    I used to use Gnome back when it was powerful, customization, intuitive and easy to use. In other words, back when it didn't suck and before it jumped the shark. When the Gnome devs lost their collective minds I switched to Xfce and have been on that ever since. However, I miss the days when Gnome was great and would love to see the project actually listen to its users and steer itself back onto the track of sanity.

    It makes me sad, reading the comments here, to realize we're still eons away from that ever happening. With Gnome continuing its campaign of being a dumbed-down exercise in frustration, and KDE being a visual clusterfuck, it's no wonder that Linux continues to struggle to get traction.

  39. Slick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bloaty. Resource-hog.

    Remind you of anyone?

    1. Re:Slick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Bloaty. Resource-hog.

      Sounds like you?

  40. What's up with the gnome hate? by jopsen · · Score: 1

    I'll admit I wasn't a fan of gnome 3 from the beginning, and it took a few years before it started to work well.. but these days it's working really well.

    I actually enjoy using gnome... what is up with all this negative sentiment?
    Note: Don't get me wrong I still can't live without type-ahead in nautilus and will probably have to patch it when I upgrade again, but all in all gnome is nice...

    1. Re:What's up with the gnome hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually enjoy using gnome... what is up with all this negative sentiment?

      The negativity stems from removal of features for the sake of removing them, and giving their user-base smug attitudes or treating them like children that don't know what's best for them.

      For example, they recently removed the status bar and system tray. Their reasoning for its removal makes very little sense. That is a key feature that lots of users and programs rely on. An example of the hell caused by this feature removal: when I minimize my VLC, it goes to the system tray, because I don't want it in my status bar. How do I get that VLC back after I minimize it? So now, not only have they removed functionality from the DM, they also removed functionality and usability from VLC and many thousands of other programs.

      That's just one recent example of the problems that gnome 3 is causing. Their smug responses to these kinds of concerns "don't like it? get MATE, mate." are even more off-putting than their software. Just look through the comments of this article, and you can see all the smugness and anecdotal evidence that it's better and that the rest of us are old codgers that need to get with the times.

      So, there is plenty of reason for negative sentiment. Removal of common features and customizability because they say so, with an attitude similar to that of poettering, is reason enough to not use any distro that uses gnome 3 as its default.

      In my opinion, the gnome devs should have dropped the name gnome altogether and rebranded. What it's becoming, is less like gnome, and more like it's own thing.

  41. I'll pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get back to me when it's not a Red Hat project and has an interface designed for people who work on their computers instead of some braindead tablet-wannabe interface.

    Long live Fluxbox and i3