Slashdot Mirror


You Are Already Living Inside a Computer (theatlantic.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Think about the computing systems you use every day. All of them represent attempts to simulate something else. Like how Turing's original thinking machine (PDF) strived to pass as a man or woman, a computer tries to pass, in a way, as another thing. As a calculator, for example, or a ledger, or a typewriter, or a telephone, or a camera, or a storefront, or a cafe. After a while, successful simulated machines displace and overtake the machines they originally imitated. The word processor is no longer just a simulated typewriter or secretary, but a first-order tool for producing written materials of all kinds. Eventually, if they thrive, simulated machines become just machines. Today, computation overall is doing this. There's not much work and play left that computers don't handle. And so, the computer is splitting from its origins as a means of symbol manipulation for productive and creative ends, and becoming an activity in its own right. Today, people don't seek out computers in order to get things done; they do the things that let them use computers.

82 comments

  1. The threat to general purpose computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're driving headlong over a cliff marked "DANGER: OVEREXTENDED METAPHOR." Let's tl;dr this summary into something a little more topical: people are starting to forget that their computers can do -anything- they tell it to do.

    1. Re:The threat to general purpose computing by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      their computers can do -anything- they tell it to do.

      O Rly? What about telling it to program two bilateral coordinates at the same time?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Well... by computational+super · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, in my case, I've been living inside a computer since 1982. Don't know about the rest of you...

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    1. Re:Well... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      The universe has always been just one giant computer and we are all one person meeting in the wrong order passing messages back and forth to each other.

    2. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of us with Group-7 access had the sense to not ignore the "Do Not Sit In Front Of Digitizing Laser" sign.

    3. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      BS without meaning ... like the OP.

    4. Re: Well... by dougdonovan · · Score: 2

      what do you mean already. i've been living inside a computer for 22 years. how else do you make a living ?

    5. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After they locked out group 7, I had to forge a group 6 access.

    6. Re: Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, that's about when I started taking too much acid too.

    7. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in my case, I've been living inside a computer since 1982. Don't know about the rest of you...

      Me too.
      I keep getting my toe nipped by the psu fan and the sata cables are giving me a hell of a wedgie.

    8. Re:Well... by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Well, in my case, I've been living inside a computer since 1982. Don't know about the rest of you...

      Computer cases in 1982 were ugly & cramped. How did you fit all your stuff inside it?

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    9. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i disagree.This universe could be like that... What you lack is abstract thinking and imagination. Makes me a little ashamed to be you, eheheh.

    10. Re:Well... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      What he lacks is a coherent definition of what a computer is.

  3. what!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "There's not much work and play left that computers don't handle."

    Are you kidding me? Go outside for once, pasty-skinned hipster. Ride a bike. Take a hike. Duh! Not everyone that reads /. is an "inside boy".

    1. Re:what!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dude, my kid just tossed down his tablet and said, "Dad, do we have time to throw the ball before dinner?"

      Oh yes we do little man. Best part of my day.

    2. Re:what!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Go outside for once, pasty-skinned hipster. Ride a bike."

      Hipsters do ride bikes. The hard part is getting them to do it without recording their path on a computer and broadcasting it to everyone they can.

    3. Re:what!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just knew there were superheroes on here. Welcome to the dark side.

    4. Re:what!?! by eneville · · Score: 1

      The data is useful. It's not useful to share with other people much, though. By repeating the same path every day its possible to see how weather (which other people track) has an effect on the activity. If wet, then I'll allow 2-5 minutes more. If freezing then 15 minutes more. Overall, though, from the tracking, I'd say the academic year has a greater effect though. The additional vehicle traffic congestion causes additional braking. As I've tracked it, spotted trends, I can adjust my day to compensate for these events.

    5. Re:what!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really? you need an app and some data analysis to tell you that traveling by road is slower in conditions and situations when people are more likely to use their car (and more carefully)?

      I'm all for data-informed decision making, but sometimes intuition is good enough.

    6. Re:what!?! by eneville · · Score: 1

      Not always. Sometimes in bad weather people stay home, so could be anyone's guess, or you can have a look at the data. It's also interesting when you measure heart rate too. When you know that the weather is to blame, you don't have to beat yourself up over it because you'd not done a PB for a while.

  4. Shut up, Banksy. by bistromath007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    None of what you said means anything. Go away.

    1. Re:Shut up, Banksy. by burhop · · Score: 1

      None of what you said means anything. Go away.

      Banksy!? I thought the picture was of Deadmaus.

  5. Great news for the homeless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They can just go to the public library and use the computers to build houses.

    Thanks, The Atlantic!

    1. Re:Great news for the homeless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no. They use public library computers to watch porn and jerk off. Asking them to leave is insensitive to the homeless, you clod!

  6. Doorbells by WrongMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article is a little bit hung up on doorbells, old doorbells versus "smart" doorbells. But to me, the doorbell has been obsoleted in a completely different way. If someone is coming over, they text me ahead of time and I can leave the door unlocked for them. The only people who ring the doorbell are solicitors or missionaries, both of which are ignored.

    1. Re:Doorbells by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      That opens a market for a new electronic doorbell: You press the button, and it plays a wav file that says "Go Away".

    2. Re:Doorbells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      solicitors and missionaries

      That's a tad redundant. -PCP

    3. Re:Doorbells by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Don't think so. A lawyer and a priest aren't the same thing.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Doorbells by desdinova+216 · · Score: 3, Funny

      how soon will the mod that makes it play "Dave's not here"

    5. Re:Doorbells by pevans · · Score: 1

      This. I live in a small town. Never lock the door. Never answer a knock or a doorbell. People I know already know to simply walk in. All others are ignored.
      I know other people who do just the same.

    6. Re:Doorbells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well played on the word play, but the fact stands that they're all selling something. I might suggest that many lawyers and priests are selling equally dubious services...at least a door to door salesman might offer an inspectable product. -PCP

    7. Re:Doorbells by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      May I correctly assume that you don't walk naked around your own home or do you - and live in a very hip small town?

    8. Re:Doorbells by tsa · · Score: 1

      In that way you never get to know new people.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    9. Re:Doorbells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You must live in a very low crime area. But don't get too smug, I used to too, but still managed to come home to a ransacked house with everything of value taken in broad daylight. Every dealt with a loss-adjuster? They're worse than the criminals. But hey, stay smug.

  7. Marijuana by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is what happens when you legalize it.

  8. I thought this would be something interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the concepts bandied about during the debate about whether we are already living in a simulation that have cropped up from time to time. But no, this is just another article decrying, but ultimately about, the internet of things, or as they refer to it the internet of shit.

    The headline should read: Stupid People Already Live Their Lives in a Computer.

  9. We are surrounded by the computer by mikael · · Score: 1

    If you consider that the global telephone system and internet is the largest distributed computer system in the world. Then you have virtual private networks that connect your own virtual machine (VMware) of Linux or Windows to cloud servers (virtual machines running on a real server) and configured using applications like Docker. Depending on your ISP, they are called anything from Bubbles to Droplets. Then you can run old PC, game consoles, and mainframe emulators on those virtual machines. Even a smartphone can emulate something like the Ultra 64.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  10. Re:Then we're all living inside Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heaven!!

  11. Headline was so promising, but ... by Alok · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was expecting some article to say that we're sims in a world that has people playing Sims ... maybe SimCity will also add features for *their* sims to play a game controlling a city too! Either that, or an article about how the entire internet is somehow a giant computer spanning the entire world, and hence we all live within it.

    Instead, its just about people using computers to mimic older technologies and displace them; because the 'mimicking' version is actually better and offers features beyond those present in the original.

    1. Re:Headline was so promising, but ... by desdinova+216 · · Score: 2

      so it would be SimCities all the way down?

    2. Re:Headline was so promising, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Essentially the author is a moron and just threw a bunch of vocabulary vomit against the virtual wall to see what would stick so he could get paid for writing a shit article.

    3. Re:Headline was so promising, but ... by Rande · · Score: 1

      The best argument for us not being in a SimCity is that there's lots of 'not fun' parts left in our 'game'.
      eg. There's no NIMBYs or BANANAs in SimCity nor people who will protest when you demolish their ghetto and build clean and safe new houses because such bits aren't fun for most people.

    4. Re:Headline was so promising, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the best indication is that no one has removed all the fire and police stations and set the world on fire yet.

      But I suppose in Simcity 2000 I usually got well into the point of self contained habitats before I got bored and started burning things for "fun".

    5. Re:Headline was so promising, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except we don't use new technology to "mimic" the old technology. Not really.
      Word processors NEVER mimicked typewriters. If they ever had mimicked typewriters no one would have used them. Anyone who think early word processors mimicked typewriters never really used either.
      New-fangled doorbells with chips and cameras and song lists and all the rest do not mimic a simple push-button doorbell. If that were the case you could say the doorbell itself "mimics" a knock on the door by being a system that uses technology to alert people inside the house that there is someone at the door.
      Cars do not "mimic" horses or there would be no point. Electric ovens do not "mimic" wood-burning stoves or no one would buy them. New tech only continues to exist when it improves on the old tech. If there is no improvement then the new tech is a flashy fad and goes away.

  12. Again? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    How many times is Slashdot going to post about this topic? It's a question that can never be answered and even when answered has no value. This is like the sixth time I've seen this same damn topic here and it's boring me. Then again, maybe I'm in control of the computer and want you stop obsessing about this or I'll hit the reset button! ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Again? by WrongMonkey · · Score: 2

      Good News! Slashdot did not post again on that topic. The article has nothing to do with Simulated Reality Theories.

    2. Re:Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do it! You don't have the balls!

    3. Re:Again? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      The universe has always been a computer.

    4. Re: Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep reading, again and again

    5. Re: Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep reading, again and again

      thoes who forget this sentence are condemned to re-read it

  13. Re:Then we're all living inside Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, Trump is certainly in a lot of people's heads, that's for sure.

  14. WAFLOR by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    WAFLOR. Pronounced like someone in the business of supplying little cakey things with square indentations.

    Meaning: What A Fucking Load Of Rubbish.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:WAFLOR by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

      And it's cousin WOFTAM

      Waste Of Fucking Time And Money

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    2. Re:WAFLOR by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

      Waflor and Woftam sound like they'd be the cranky old twin Norse Gods of "I told you so, you stupid mortal". Sure, being Norse Gods I imagine they'd have big shiny weapons and a big mug of ale or mead at all times, but mostly I think they'd wander around cuffing fools and laugh at them when they fell on their mortal asses.

      I'm not sure that portfolio's ever been assigned to a God before, but I like it.

    3. Re:WAFLOR by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I like the image. For some reason I'm picturing them as being conjoined.

      That means they're like what are commonly called "Siamese twins", for the benefit of any theatlantic.com, wired or verge staff who might be reading.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:WAFLOR by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I never waste my fucking time, I try to extend it as long as possible.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:WAFLOR by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      and I read WOFTAM as Wolfram, like Wolfram alpha.

  15. THis sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My internet went down and I couldn't brush my teeth. https://youtu.be/gtJlcwLoD9I

  16. Explain by sucko · · Score: 0

    What the fuck is this supposed to be?

  17. Hypnosis machines by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    The other theory is that all of us are walking around under a constant state of hypnosis, and our conscious mind only thinks it's in control - but in fact our conscious mind is only a hallucination of our subconscious mind that is doing everything that we do on auto-pilot.

    I mean, you don't think about the details of breathing or having your heart beat... unless you focus upon it consciously. Those things go on in autopilot.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Hypnosis machines by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Here is another explanation: things we don't know are unknown, and not knowing the answer doesn't prove it is something silly you can just daydream.

  18. Still confused by boudie2 · · Score: 1

    To save others the pain of reading TFA, I think I was just warned about the dangers of spending too much time sitting in front of a computer by somebody who sounds like he's spent too much time sitting in front of a computer. Life imitates art ... and so it goes ... 10 minutes I'll never be able to get back.

  19. Bastardization of Computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of today's computers are little more than a human extension. They are nearly all designed to be "operated" by humans. Autonomous computing is being actively discouraged by the likes of Google and their awful Captcha.

  20. Re:Then we're all living inside Trump by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1
  21. We are not living in a computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry. Well, not at all sorry.

  22. Are you using the tool or is the tool using you? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    That's what this article sounds like.

    If the tool is using you: then I pity you, you've lost too much of yourself along the way.

  23. Re:Are you using the tool or is the tool using you by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I live in Soviet Russia, you insensitive clod!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  24. No I'm not. You are just a lifeless drone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No I'm not. You are just a lifeless drone.

    Your devices have off switches. Try them some time. See if you are capable of accomplishing something, anything, without them.

  25. Meaningless Drivel... by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    "...computing systems...represent attempts to simulate something else...like...a calculator...a ledger, or a typewriter, or a telephone, or a camera..."

    That's meaningless attempts to simulate meaningful conversation and thought. A computer is a calculator, is a ledger, is a typewriter, is a telephone, is a camera. There is no meaningful need to continue to implement a function the way it was done the first time. With the writer's logic a film camera is an attempt to simulate a glass plate camera which is an attempt to simulate a photorealistic drawing which is an attempt to simulate a still life. No, the computer is a camera, is a ledger, is a typewriter, camera, etc. The physical manual or electric version is a mere implementation. The newer version, which includes a CCD and computer, is a far better implementation of a camera than the old glass plate or film versions ever were.

    This is reality.

    1. Re:Meaningless Drivel... by l20502 · · Score: 1

      But will digital or printed from digital photos last as long as 100+ year old ones that survived dirt, rats and mold?

    2. Re:Meaningless Drivel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some will, the important ones will be copied to every medium as needed (wikipedia will keep things going for a while, and after that, something will catalog the important ones).

      Will we lose some, yes. We have to, we make them too fast for keeping everything to be feasible. Even with storage as cheap as it currently is.

  26. Re:Then we're all living inside Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, Trump is certainly in a lot of people's heads, that's for sure.

    If Obama hadn't been in so many, er, *people's* heads for so long, Trump probably wouldn't have gotten elected.
    Thanks Obama!!! For nothing.

  27. Re: Then we're all living inside Trump by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

    So your solution to having a president who doesn't do a few of the things you want is to elect a president who is going to completely wreck the country for everybody. Hate to tell you this, but that's not something to be proud of.

  28. Sigh by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sigh, the reason they slap computers into everything is that it has become more cost effective to do so. It's cheaper to take a generic 8 bit CPU and program it to be a calculator, a memory stick, a microwave or dishwasher than it is to build custom circuits for each. It's that fucken simple. It's not going to go away, in fact it's going to get a lot "worse", if you consider that a bad thing. What's annoying me about it is the whole IOT part which is getting shoved down our throats, whether we want it or not. I don't mind the general concept of IOT, I have an issue with proprietary devices circumventing my firewall to "phone home" and how inherently insecure they are proving to be, on top of the lack of updates (blueborne is but a recent example). Hence my not so newfound hobby - electronics! Will roll my own IOT devices, thank you very much.

    --
    There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  29. You are late to the party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was already the case for me 20 years ago. Using a computer to program and then using those programs, paperless for most of my life due to this, used it to read and write, listen to music, etc.

    Now that it has become a tool for my job and I have a kid I have moved away from that and just focus on him in my free time. I guess in 20 years everyone else who is just now getting to that point will also move on?

  30. Don't worry by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

    A clickbait post to incite another "we're probably living in a simulation" circlejerk generally shows up on here every couple of months. We're about due for another one, so you shouldn't have to wait long.

  31. Well, of course. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    The Matrix has you.

  32. Re:Then we're all living inside Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like if Hillary didn't sabotage the other Dems running they probably would have won but nobody likes that bitch. She should be in prison for treason.

  33. hacking on humbug by epine · · Score: 1

    As I read it, Turing's paper was entirely about hacking on humbug human attitudes: if flesh and metal both give the same answers (or similar enough that you can't tell the difference) isn't it a just distinction without a difference to describe one as alive and conscious and the other inanimate and unconscious?

    This paper really had very little to do with computers at all.

  34. Crap Article, click bait title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a piece of shit.

  35. Re: Then we're all living inside Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly someone is using the first definition of treason:
    Treason -
    1) being someone I don't like for vague and never clearly nor consistently applied reasons, often with no basis in fact.
    2) the actual definition