Results of the Ubuntu Desktop Applications Survey (dustinkirkland.com)
Ubuntu Product and Strategy head at Canonical, dustinkirkland writes: A few months ago, Slashdot readers were asked for feedback on the Ubuntu Desktop default applications. This blog post, by the author of that post (hi, it's me again), provides the aggregated and processed results of that survey.
Yeah, I opened the link, found it to be a bunch of videos and just a mere couple of lines of text, and closed the tab. Videos are annoying enough even as-is, let alone videos recorded at some conference or such.
There's also 44 frames of a PPT, in low resolution, with so much jpeg that you cannot read them properly.
"Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
I'm getting the impression that knowing how to read automatically removes the user from consideration in the Ubuntu (and Gnome as well) worlds.
The message you send by making video-only text-based content is :"If you can read you're way too smart to be the target of this content. This content is for people too stupid to read, so go away!"
I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
Winner:
Visual Studio
Clearly no one from Slashdot voted for that as it's made by Microsoft.
Print those slides on a colour inket printer, then send those prints to me by fax.
#DeleteFacebook
There's also 44 frames of a PPT, in low resolution, with so much jpeg that you cannot read them properly.
So, the author must have been stuck with Ubuntu desktop apps to produce his report. Hence the crappy result.
https://www.microsoft.com/net/...
Microsoft raised the white flag and surrendered to Linux a year or two ago.
If I click "Download" on that page then "Continue to download", I'm presented with a box to log in to LinkedIn or sign up for LinkedIn. Was this article intended as an ad for Microsoft's LinkedIn service?
In fact, these situations are identical to running Visual Studio on a virtual machine! Any application written in Java is actually being run on its virtual machine rather than on Ubuntu, why should that situation be any different?
The most relevant differences are that these virtual machines are (a) free software and (b) included with your Ubuntu installation. Windows is neither. One might also point out that the JVM or other language-specific virtual machine is much "thinner", and better integrated with the host operating system, than the full PC hardware emulation that you need to run Windows as a guest operating system.
"The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat