Slashdot Mirror


Developer Marco Arment Shares Thoughts On iPhone X's Notch (marco.org)

Developer Marco Arment writes about the infamous notch on the iPhone X, which Apple has told developers to embrace rather than ignore: This is the new shape of the iPhone. As long as the notch is clearly present and of approximately these proportions, it's unique, simple, and recognizable. It's probably not going to significantly change for a long time, and Apple needs to make sure that the entire world recognizes it as well as we could recognize previous iPhones. That's why Apple has made no effort to hide the notch in software, and why app developers are being told to embrace it in our designs. That's why the HomePod software leak depicted the iPhone X like this: it's the new basic, recognizable form of the iPhone. Apple just completely changed the fundamental shape of the most important, most successful, and most recognizable tech product that the world has ever seen.

194 comments

  1. Obligatory by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 5, Funny

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Please note:
    I have an iPod, iPhone, Mac mini and Apple TV. This is not a troll, only the truth that can be seen even by Apple users.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep that YouTube video summed up what I think of the X. Do we really need Apple's Keynote's to introduce such basic refreshes and a couple gimmicks many other makers have already done?

    2. Re:Obligatory by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Those guys could’ve made an entire video just mocking the “ears” on the iPhone X-moji.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhoneX is kind of futuristic ... for Apple and Apple fans...
      this is the first time an Apple Phone is including tech that is not 4 years old... the screen it uses is on par with what most Android phones pioneered in 2015!

      This time Apple has actually "invented" a screen that is only 2 years behind everyone else... as apposed to their usual 4 year gap!

      Yes! IPhony X is truly from the future according to the Steve Jobs calender. The year is 6 AJ (the 6th year After Jobs death)

    4. Re:Obligatory by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      If the iPhone uses technology in 2017 that was pioneered by Android phones in 2015... you know what that means, right?

      Apple invented time travel! I find it strange that they took so long to use it though, because Time Machine, was introduced in 2007.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  2. Anybody who needs to identify by fred6666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    with a unique, identifiable and recognizable shape for their phone is an idiot. Just like anybody who needs everyone to know what phone brand they use.

    1. Re:Anybody who needs to identify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, marketing be damned, amirite?

    2. Re:Anybody who needs to identify by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

      Clearly a unique recognizable shape has held Coca-Cola back for years.

    3. Re:Anybody who needs to identify by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      their cans or bottles aren't the same shape as Pepsi?

    4. Re:Anybody who needs to identify by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Their cans are. Their bottles aren't.

    5. Re:Anybody who needs to identify by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      well then, anybody who buys a Coca Cola because (or partly because) of the distinctive shape of their bottle is an idiot.

    6. Re:Anybody who needs to identify by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's just a part of marketing. If you think you are unaffected by marketing, you're deluded. Marketing takes advantage of quirks of the way the human mind works. And yours is no different.

    7. Re:Anybody who needs to identify by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      My point is that some people are proud to be affected by it.

    8. Re:Anybody who needs to identify by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      It's not to get you to buy it because you like the shape, it's to allow you to recognize the genuine article even if you don't understand the writing on the bottle. It's like the Nike Swoosh - a trademark. Given how few glass bottles are sold these days, it's not so much of an advantage anymore.

    9. Re:Anybody who needs to identify by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      why would you need to understand the writing on the bottle? There is a label that says Coca Cola. On the bottle itself, but also on the box and on the vending machine.

    10. Re:Anybody who needs to identify by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I can read Roman, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts, if not the underlying languages. Arabic, Hebrew, Indic, Hangul, any Chinese or Japanese script? Nope, sorry. How many of these would you recognize without the red+white+swoop pattern?

    11. Re:Anybody who needs to identify by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      bad example since none of these have the alleged distinctive coca cola bottle shape

  3. Trademark by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    I bet they've already trademarked that shape / design.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Trademark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I bet they've already trademarked that shape / design.

      I hope so, just in case any other manufacturers get the stupid idea to copy it..

    2. Re:Trademark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya apples last thermonuclear war went sooooo well.

    3. Re:Trademark by forkfail · · Score: 1

      I bet they've already trademarked that shape / design.

      For once, I approve of the broken trademark and patent systems.

      At least this will prevent the spread of this... less than optimal design.

      --
      Check your premises.
    4. Re:Trademark by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I bet they've already trademarked that shape / design.

      I'd bet not, since you can't trademark a product design. You're likely thinking of a design patent, which basically functions like a trademark (rather than utility patents), except that it's used for product designs instead of logos, slogans, and other trade marks. If they did trademark anything related to the iPhone X, it would be the iconography associated with it (i.e. the illustration of its outline shown in the linked blog post), rather than the product design itself.

    5. Re:Trademark by dodged · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't they? They did invent it after all....

  4. Courage? by sh00z · · Score: 3, Funny

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    1. Re:Courage? by jm007 · · Score: 1

      that's no shit, after reading the article I thought 'courage' might have some sort of archaic, rarely-used meaning other than the normal one I'd come to expect; nope, just some dipshit's attempt to make the mundane seem important

  5. Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And why should we care?

    Has Apple trademarked 'the notch'?

    At times in the past, Apple has chosen to blatantly 'wear' mistakes they have made. Will this be the same? Will there be further generation 'notces' even when the notch is even less necessary?

    Will 'screen protector' stickers with a darkened 'notch' area on one side become the trendy thing to stick on your older Apple Gadget?

    1. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by lucm · · Score: 1

      And why should we care?

      He ended his blog post with "courage", which takes courage.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Informative

      Marco Arment was the original developer behind Tumblr, the original developer behind Instapaper (i.e. the first big "read it later" service on mobile), is currently the developer for the Overcast podcast app and service, but is probably most well-known in Apple tech circles these days as a blogger and podcaster (he hosts a few podcasts, the biggest one being the Accidental Tech Podcast with John Siracusa and Casey Liss).

      As for why you should care? You shouldn't. Mind you, I read his blog and regularly listen to his podcasts, so I'd lump myself in as a fan of the things he has to say (which isn't to say that I agree with them, just that I like hearing them). I was fine with Slashdot covering his blog entry last year when he railed against the quality of software that Apple was putting out, because even though he later regretted having made that post, it still did an excellent job at coalescing and reflecting a broader sense of dissatisfaction among Apple users at the time. But his random thoughts on the shape of the iPhone X? Even I don't think that warrants Slashdot coverage. It was something I enjoyed reading yesterday, but it doesn't warrant reposting here.

    3. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another wannabe that managed to con Slashdot into giving him some free publicity.

      And I bet that despite all the bitching, he will continue to make iOS apps because that's were all the real money is.

      Courage indeed.

    4. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by magusxxx · · Score: 1

      Will iTunes be the only place we can buy Ninotchka?

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    5. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Has Apple trademarked 'the notch'?

      Cue iPhone cases with vaginas on 'em in 3..2..1

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      When you've produced a couple of very successful products, you're not a "wannabe" anymore.

    7. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Courage would be calling it a snotch, short for "Eeees not a notch"

    8. Re: Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I thought Stewart Butterfield was behing tumblr.

    9. Re: Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      You can be a has-been. But only time will tell. And it's completely a dtreaction. I now know who this developer is. My initial comment is thus productive.

    10. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by JohnFen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And why should we care?

      I care about this for the same reason I care about the headphone jack: I fear that other manufacturers will copy this shit from Apple.

    11. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But "Courage"

      What utter bullshit.

    12. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Arment put as much time into his research about the future of idevices as he does his programming projects, then he'd find patents that talk about putting things underneath the screen.

      To that end, the buldge is NOT PERMANENT. It will be gone in a generation or two, considering how close Samsung et al, is to accomplishing the feat.

    13. Re: Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      From what it looks like, he was behind Flickr, not Tumblr.

    14. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Has Apple trademarked 'the notch'?

      oh oh oh PLEASE! They should trademark removing headphone jacks as well. Maybe then the stupidity will stop.

    15. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Has Apple trademarked 'the notch'?

      It's likely they will, in the past Apple has used design patents to protect that kind of thing, and they've won lawsuits with them.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    16. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by Brockmire · · Score: 0

      Fuck that guy. Ask the military, police, firefighters and defence witnesses, etc what courage is. Fuck Apple and everyone redefining it for some fucking tech marketing. Fuck that. That shit will ruin the youth even more.

    17. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Need to lay off the crack pipe, that should have been prosecution witness.

    18. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll probably just start having jealous isheep that cant afford the newest ooh shiny start making wallpapers with a "notch" in them so at least from afar it will look to their isheep peers they have the latest ooh shiny.

    19. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Had no idea how many vagina cases were available for the iPhone.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    20. Re:Who is 'Developer Marco Arment'? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Had no idea how many vagina cases were available for the iPhone.

      It's pretty well mind-boggling, right? Who thinks it's a great idea to hold that up in front of their face? I can only hope that most of them are purchased as gifts.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. It may just be me, but by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I’ll be sticking with my notch-less iPhone 6S for a while longer.

    While there are certainly different tiers of smartphones, we’re really at the point where these are more or less commodities. They’ve been powerful enough to keep using multiple years for some time now.

    So sorry, Mr. Veblun, but I won’t be spending $1000-1200 on a phone.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re: It may just be me, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait...allow the essence of the product to sink in. Absorbing the holistic passion that Apple's team used to build this iconic piece of jewelry should account for no less than $1000 of the price...this way you are really only paying $100-200 for the pleasure of wielding such marvelous bling.

    2. Re:It may just be me, but by antdude · · Score: 1

      4S for me. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  7. Re: Next up, the iPhone XXX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And whose penis is the Pixel? Schmidt's? Or is it a Larry? A Brin? Flat jokes aside... there's some hate love biased towards Apple. A big white whale everyone seems to be obsessed with.

  8. This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is some developers drooling over the notch news? I mean it's barely even a coherent blog post, let alone one that talks in any way about what the extra screen space could mean or be used for, what kinds of challenges there could be for developing for it, or really anything other than fapping over the iPhone x design for being "courageous".

    I mean Jesus Christ slashdot, I know it's a slow day but come on, we can do better than this.

  9. It's the symmetry, stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The asymmetry... I hate it, I hate it, I hate it, it's poking in my eye, it's making Steve Jobs turn in his grave. It's fugly.

  10. Essential Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beat them to it. So....not.

  11. That’s courage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that's bad design.

    1. Re:That’s courage? by JohnFen · · Score: 2

      Judging by the design decisions being made in the computer industry over the last few years, there seems to be an awful lot of designers who think that bad design is the hallmark of good design. It's the curse of the UX crowd.

  12. Throwing the 'Courage' word around by Sebby · · Score: 1

    Ever since Schiller's said that word, it's nearly lost all meaning.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    1. Re:Throwing the 'Courage' word around by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Ever since Schiller's said that word, it's nearly lost all meaning.

      I'd say it's gained a meaning. In addition to "the quality of mind or spirit that enables a person to face difficulty, danger, pain, etc., without fear; bravery ...", the word now also signifies "defensiveness about one's flawed logic and poor aesthetic sense, arising from a grandiose persecution complex".

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    2. Re:Throwing the 'Courage' word around by Sebby · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, Apple is "courageous" for dropping the headphone jack; but firefighters? Nah, they're not "courageous" like Apple, they just do their jobs, which is run into burning buildings.

      All those WW soldiers? Bah! They're not "courageous" like Apple, they just went out to fight some bad guys.

      I could go on....

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    3. Re:Throwing the 'Courage' word around by Sebby · · Score: 1

      (damn submit/preview crap - when is /. gonna implement live preview of comments!?)

      My point (and I get yours) is that Schiller and by extension Apple, has totally insulted a large group of people, both present, past and future, when they called themselves "courageous".

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  13. Re:Apple continues to degrade functionality by JohnFen · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Essential Phone does this, in a slightly less obnoxious manner (since the cutout is smaller) -- and receives much ridicule about it.

    Justifiably, in my opinion -- it's a terrible design decision. It could be OK if the status bar sat below the cutout instead of being cut in half by it.

  14. It's a dick, not a notch. A dick with ears. by smartr · · Score: 0

    Apple is bravely shooting itself in the foot with an ugly ass notch. The landscape looks like crap, and I think it's pretty ridiculous to expect programmers and designers to accommodate for a uniquely stupid design. If they want ears with Apple specific info in portrait mode, by all means do so, but do the developer world a favor and black that shit out in landscape apple. Steve Jobs probably would have throw the iPhone "ten" in the trash. https://www.theverge.com/2017/... https://twitter.com/JoeLimits/... https://twitter.com/vojtastavi... https://www.youtube.com/watch?... https://twitter.com/fet_compla...

    1. Re:It's a dick, not a notch. A dick with ears. by swimboy · · Score: 1

      By default, the notch is blacked out in landscape mode. You have to click on the "expand" arrows to fill the screen to the edge and make the notch visible.

      --
      Ask me how the Heisenberg Principle may or may not have saved my life.
    2. Re:It's a dick, not a notch. A dick with ears. by smartr · · Score: 1

      Source? Cause everything I am seeing from designers looks like a dick in the margins to me: https://twitter.com/thomasfuch...

    3. Re:It's a dick, not a notch. A dick with ears. by swimboy · · Score: 1

      Here's David Pogue mentioning it: https://twitter.com/Pogue/stat...

      --
      Ask me how the Heisenberg Principle may or may not have saved my life.
    4. Re:It's a dick, not a notch. A dick with ears. by smartr · · Score: 1

      So... it can add margins when viewing videos based on which mode you pick... More modes! Apple has an entire guide instructing designers to embrace the notch.... Why would any indie team embrace the "notch" for their game / app / website? This seems like a pretty big fuck you to them from Apple.

    5. Re:It's a dick, not a notch. A dick with ears. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great to see it is using the background tag to determine that color. Now i'm going to purposely write up some java scipt to put on every single web page i own that will cycle the background though some seizure inducing pattern. Every other browser and device on the planet will display the page properly but the isheep will have to suffer with pulsating psychedelic colors in those "ears" or whatever the fuck they want to call them.

  15. The many benefits of FaceID by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There are a lot of FaceID detractors - that is to eb expected of course, since what Apple does is wait until they can make technology not suck before they include it. Before Apple added TouchID, the only experience people had with touch sensors was very poor sensors that mostly didn't work. But now TouchID is beloved and people fear its removal..

    FaceID is the same way. Some phones now have face recognition, but it's so primitive it can be fooled with a picture - and even then it often doesn't work really well, because lighting can affect it badly.

    Apple's approach to FaceID will pretty obviously work much better than existing systems, so it will be a lot more reliable and quicker than what exists.

    But that's not really what I mostly wanted to point out - in the face of FaceID detraction I wanted to explain the many benefits of the way FaceID works that many people may not have thought of.

    1) Most important - it will work for the elderly. You may not all be aware of this, but fingerprint sensors have more and more trouble reading your prints as you age. The U.S. government Global Entry readers cannot even read my mothers fingerprints, at all - TouchID sensors can, but even then sometimes it will not work and that will only get worse as she gets older. But FaceID will work well for anyone of any age.

    2) I think the flow for working with the system will work better with FaceID than TouchID. There've been a number of times when I've raised the phone to take a picture, and accidentally unlocked to the home screen instead. Similar deal for the Today view on the lock screen...

    3) Since it can "see" when I am looking at the phone I no longer have to pick up the phone if I want to check for notifications on the lock screen.

    4) For authentication requests there will be zero delay like there is today where a dialog comes up and asks you to confirm with TouchID. Instead it can simply ask if you approve, having already validated your face before the dialog even appears.

    5) People seemed concerned about the bar but honestly who even notices things like that after a week? Those kinds of things always fade into the background after days of use and the brain does not even notice them. It takes a lot of sensors to do what they are doing with FaceID and I'd rather they have that then have the entire screen be clear, and do something wonky like move a TouchID sensor to the back of the phone...

    Is the X some kind of leap? No, but FaceID come closer to being a real leap than most iterations have.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The many benefits of FaceID by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      1) Most important - it will work for the elderly.

      Which is pretty important...

    2. Re:The many benefits of FaceID by f00zbll · · Score: 1
      FaceID is just the first obvious use case of the TrueDepth camera. Having worked with computer vision and played with various techniques, the innovative part is shrinking XBox Kinect down to a mobile phone. Essentially the sensor array at the top means iphone X can do depth sensing and binocular vision. But it's not like having 2 color camera's which is known to have major limitations. Having IR dot projector + IR camera + regular camera means it's easier do image recognition because you don't need to calculate the depth field in software. Having the depth field calculated by hardware means you can focus on the algorithm part of image recognition. You don't have to muddle with offset calculation, depth calculation and a bunch of other tedious stuff. I just hope Apple opens it up.

      You know Qualcomm, Samsung and Google are all working on similar efforts and I would expect them to bring out similar hardware acceleration in 2-3yrs

    3. Re:The many benefits of FaceID by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      That's a really good point, and I wonder if eventually they'll not do something else with the depth capability - they could recognize a hand right in front of the screen to have in-air gesture support for some actions like back or skipping songs...

      Apple at the moment seems disinclined to let developers have access to the raw sensors but they are at least giving you the ability to work with the depth map programmatically through the camera API.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:The many benefits of FaceID by f00zbll · · Score: 1

      literally look at all the neat shit people do on kinect hacks or makerspace with 3D scanners. The TrueDepth camera just needs software and a turn table to create a 3D scan of a smallish object.

    5. Re:The many benefits of FaceID by krkhan · · Score: 1

      When your #1 justification for a controversial design decision by fucking Apple involves the elderly, clearly they're on to something.

    6. Re:The many benefits of FaceID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) Why on earth are you grabbing your phone on the front and back like a freak? Everyone grabs it by the side because you get a better grip. LOL Also, you "THINK" is not "you know". The proper response is: "Let's see how they've implemented it"

      3) So if you put your phone down on the table, you now have to be extra careful nobody swipes your super-expensive phone. It will be unlocked and usable by anybody.

      4) That's pretty stupid. No prompt to verify you want to do? So you'll commit to paying without seeing how much the phone is going to transfer?

      5) Or they could have simply gon with a 98% bezel-less phone instead of 99% and not have the notch?

  16. Not worse than the headphone jack by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    Marco Arment said:

    Many Apple fans were amused when Phil Schiller explained the removal of the headphone jack on last year’s iPhone as “courage”. But that was nothing compared to what happened last week.

    Since we're using "courage" as a synonym for "stupid" these days, the removal of the headphone jack took more "courage". The cutout has mostly an aesthetic impact. The headphone jack removal has a functionality impact.

    1. Re:Not worse than the headphone jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid? I think you mean "greed". Removing the headphone jack is 100% about controlling the user.

    2. Re:Not worse than the headphone jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the issue is there's courageous and brave (fighting a foe) and courageous and stupid (jumping off a roof). These decisions are simply the latter.

    3. Re:Not worse than the headphone jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Removing the headphone jack is about waterproofing. They ship a lightning to headphone adapter in the box - and tests show it a very high quality DAC. With wireless charging this isn't even hardly an issue now - it was only "courage" on the 7 because of audio + charge.

    4. Re:Not worse than the headphone jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Removing the headphone jack is about waterproofing. They ship a lightning to headphone adapter in the box - and tests show it a very high quality DAC. With wireless charging this isn't even hardly an issue now - it was only "courage" on the 7 because of audio + charge.

      Stop ruining his hategasm with with 'facts'.

    5. Re:Not worse than the headphone jack by JohnFen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Removing the headphone jack is about waterproofing.

      Why couldn't Apple figure out how to make a waterproof device with a headphone jack? Other devices have been managing it for years.

    6. Re:Not worse than the headphone jack by Falos · · Score: 1

      Intent is subjective.

      Stop trying to micdrop.

    7. Re:Not worse than the headphone jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waterproof the jack and continue to take up a comparatively large volume of the device for a jack that duplicates functionality already present, or rely on your rabid fans to follow your lead? Simple choice.

      The notch, on the other hand, isn't going to be accommodated for by every website in the world.

  17. mark of quality ! by swell · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't it obvious? The 'notch' screams QUALITY so loud that even non techies are eager to part with their $1,000. Combined with the clearly identifiable Apple Watch, these proud owners will turn their noses up at the rest of us unwashed common folk.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:mark of quality ! by avandesande · · Score: 1

      It's just a useless part of the screen that wastes power

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:mark of quality ! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      When you're not wasting $1000 on a freakin' phone, you have money for soap. We're not un-washed, we're un-hipster and we like it.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:mark of quality ! by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I will put a piece of tape on bottom of screen so i have a notch too

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    4. Re:mark of quality ! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Considering the phone looks like someone spilled black goo on the top of the screen, I do wonder who is the "unwashed" here.

    5. Re:mark of quality ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, quality. In 6 months Microsoft will release their high quality phone with a notch on the top and bottom. One month later Google will release the superior quality phone with notches all around the entire edge of the screen! Beat that suckers!!!! I'm going to DIY my own phone with so many notices you'll only have a 1 inch screen. Hell Yeah! Expect Samsung to screw it up by trying to make the notch go all the way down and they'll just end up with a phone you can fold in half. Losers.

  18. dare to be stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marco Arment is an idiot. So are the people who designed this. Screens are rectangle for a reason you imbeciles.

  19. That's a flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like on the Essential phone (which is already out and beat Apple to market with the same bad idea), that annoying chunk of the screen missing is a flaw, and people will see it as a flaw.
    It's like the flat tire on the Motorola watch, only worse because the top edge of a phone usually contains important information, like the time, signal strength, battery life, etc.

  20. The iSheep are happy by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 0

    They will be happy with anything regurgitated by the Cupertino people, with or without notch.

    1. Re:The iSheep are happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you cry yourself to sleep at night each time you realize you're stuck using collectivist android garbage? Or do you jerk off first and then cry? Not judging you - but that seems to be typical behavior of android geeks.

    2. Re:The iSheep are happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ, you are a dullard.

    3. Re:The iSheep are happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird. I have friends that will only drive Chevy's or Ford's, or Honda's or Toyota's. I never hear anyone call them iSheep or mindless fanbois.

      It's a phone, not a religion.

    4. Re:The iSheep are happy by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I never hear anyone call them iSheep or mindless fanbois.

      You are very lucky to have managed to avoid the generation-spanning flamewar between the Ford fanboys and the Chevy fanboys!

    5. Re:The iSheep are happy by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Just wait until they find out about the Lincoln vs Miller welder fanboys, Ford vs. Chevy has nothing on them.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  21. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow, gush much? I think I need an insulin shot after reading that summary...

    "Apple just completely changed the fundamental shape of the most important, most successful, and most recognizable tech product that the world has ever seen." /yawn

    1. Re:Wow... by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 1

      I got an iBoner when I read it!

      --
      Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
    2. Re:Wow... by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Wow, gush much? I think I need an insulin shot after reading that summary...

      That isn't gushing, it's stating a fact that Apple is taking a risk in messing with a successful formula.

      "Apple just completely changed the fundamental shape of the most important, most successful, and most recognizable tech product that the world has ever seen." /yawn

      Exactly what in that sentence is wrong? The iPhone DID pretty much define the smartphone as we know it today and this IS a change to that. Good, bad, or indifferent the sentence you are snarking about is probably factually correct. The iPhone made Apple the most valuable publicly traded company on the planet and defined a device category. Whether we like Apple or not you have to admit the design of the iPhone had a lot to do with that.

    3. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the most important, most successful, and most recognizable tech product

      How about a car? Or a refrigerator? Or a washing machine? An airco? An airplane? There are rather a lot of contenders for most important, successful, and recognizable. Personally, I would go with refrigerator.

    4. Re:Wow... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The article is very much gushing.

      "Gushing" doesn't mean, or even imply, that the facts stated are incorrect. It means that the facts are presented with a certain editorial tone.

    5. Re:Wow... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Even if we stick to personal computing technology, both x86 and ARM processors are well ahead in importance and success, albeit probably not in recognition.

    6. Re:Wow... by imidan · · Score: 1

      Exactly what in that sentence is wrong?

      The word "fundamental," to start. Apple did not change the fundamental shape of the iPhone. If they made it, I dunno, round or toroidal, that would be a change to the fundamental shape. As it is, they changed it from a rectangle to a rectangle with some of its screen blocked by other hardware. Apparently, they faced the choice of whether to have a little patch of screen to the right and left of that bar, or just to make the screen start below it. I don't think either choice they could have made in that situation could be described as "courageous."

  22. Re:Now see here, fuckhead. by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    Capiche?

    No, capisce.

  23. Re:Now see here, fuckhead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Your language also makes you easily identified, regardless of posting as AC. You sound like a terrorist.

  24. Seems like non-Apple people care more about looks by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The funny thing about the notch to me is I don't really care about it, it seems like non-Apple people are making a bigger deal out of this than the Apple people...

    I thought Apple people were the ones who cared about superficial looks, but that does not appear to be the case.

    On a side note I didn't get the part of the video where he was swiping up to home, he was pretending he meant to scroll instead? But who does that from a tab bar, honestly. The rest of the video was amusing though.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  25. "That's courage"? by edeefelt · · Score: 2

    I enjoyed the article, until the last line: "That’s courage." Really? Reminds me of this ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:"That's courage"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised more people aren't lambasting that line. Seriously? Courage? No. Courage is rushing into a burning building to save someone. Courage is not putting a black bar int he middle top of your phone screen.

  26. WTF is a notch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android user here.

    I don't care enough to RTFA.

    Can someone explain?

    1. Re:WTF is a notch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I asked my Mom. She slapped me! :(

    2. Re:WTF is a notch? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:WTF is a notch? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      It's the gap between Madonna's front teeth.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  27. Blemish by mysidia · · Score: 1

    It looks like those old remote controls. The Notch is an unwanted blemish IMO.
    I would rather see developers hide it.

  28. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    The most important part of the video, the reason I linked to it, is the part where that notch is clearly obtrusive when watching photos or videos.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  29. Re:Now see here, fuckhead. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    No, capellini.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  30. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by Kielistic · · Score: 1

    I care when they start trying to shove IE6 levels of stupidity into the browser-wars.

  31. Re:Apple continues to degrade functionality by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    It would be OK if Apple didn't force all apps to use the areas on both sides of the notch and always displayed status icons on a black background.

    The whole thing would bland and sort of become invisible. But that would be good for users and bad for marketing, so screw the users.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  32. In real use that will almost never matter. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    But even there he had to circle the thing in big lines to call it out. In real use after a week or so you'll not even notice the thing is there.

    In real use people rotate phones rarely, even looking at photos they are more inclined to zoom to see a landscape image than they are to rotate.

    In watching videos most people rotate, but if you consider how tall the screen is doesn't it seem like most aspect ratios for movies / tv shows will have black bars at the sides of the screens anyway? It's only video shot on the phone itself that would really fill the screen like that unless you were cropping the top/bottom of the video.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: In real use that will almost never matter. by TimMD909 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You people who don't rotate end up shooting videos vertically. You are the root of all that's evil in this world and YouTube. Rotate your damn cell phones.

    2. Re: In real use that will almost never matter. by tepples · · Score: 1

      What's the best way to shoot horizontal video of a vertical subject, especially in a room too small to fit the entire subject vertically in the frame of a horizontal camera?

    3. Re: In real use that will almost never matter. by mlyle · · Score: 1

      This is the one time that vertical video is OK, but even so-- most of the time you would still be better off with a horizontal framing of the subject.

      Yes, losing the bottom sucks. But compared to giant black bars when anyone not on a phone views it, it's the lesser sin.

    4. Re: In real use that will almost never matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YT Mobile supports full screen vertical videos now. It's nice when done right.

    5. Re: In real use that will almost never matter. by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I partially agree with this, but where you can only zoom so far digitally and it isn't always practical to "zoom out" using your feet, in a small room, etc. portrait/vertical shooting is the obvious solution.

      What DOES need to die is the godawful trend of framing portrait/vertical videos with sidebars of blurred portions of the video; this kills the ability to properly enjoy the video; rotate it and you don't get much of a zoom, and you can't zoom in to the video in portrait mode because of the fucking blurry sidebars. Please shoot - to kill* - the hipster who started that fucking trend!

      *please don't be a deplorable by shooting the fucking hipster.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    6. Re: In real use that will almost never matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this trend was invented by the news media back in the days of the SDTV to HDTV transition. I saw this technique used a lot when SD news footage was shown on an HDTV channel.

    7. Re: In real use that will almost never matter. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    8. Re: In real use that will almost never matter. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1
      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  33. My baby's got fat bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the big fat bar on my non-Apple product. Shows I'm not a fanatic Apple worshiper.

  34. The Future isn't about the display by f00zbll · · Score: 1
    How many engineers does it take to loose their mind over stupid screens?

    Answer: more than necessary

    Seriously how many people can tell the difference between a 400, 425, 450, 500 ppi screen 16-24 inches from your eyes? All of this bitching and moaning about screens is stupidity. We've gone far past diminishing returns for screens. It uses more battery, increases the charges needed per week and overall is a waste of energy. Go ahead and get all bent. The "future" part of X is the neural engine and dedicated ASIC in A11. Yes I own a iPhone and I also own android tablet. I don't give a crap because at the end of the day I build software for customers. What I do care about is the built-in hardware capabilities and the ease of development process.

    Frankly I could give a shit about how pretty the iPhone looks. I'd gladly swap out the expensive industrial design to save money. For a simple reason, people drop phones. My kids drop their phones. A more expensive screen just means more $$ to fix it. Buying used phones makes it affordable. Anyone that buys a new Smart phone be it iPhone or Galaxy is a fucking moron with more money than brains.

    1. Re:The Future isn't about the display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OLED display that the iPhone X has (and that top Androids have had for awhile) does legitimately have some advantages that are novel. Better blacks, more efficient, and possibly a bit more resilient (though I'm not sure if they carried that through to implementation). Certainly just putting more pixels on the screen doesn't matter too much these days, but there's still advancements in screen tech.

      OLED production is still not adequate for everything though, which is probably a big part of why Apple had to launch two models- even if everyone was buying a 1000 dollar phone, they simply wouldn't be able to make enough iPhone X for their demand, so they needed a model without that. Other companies have this issue too, which is why only their top of the line things are OLED.

      Anyway, the OLED thing does appear to be real progress on screens that matters, even if extra resolutions isn't a big deal.

    2. Re:The Future isn't about the display by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      We've gone far past diminishing returns for screens.

      Yes. The real underlying issue is that phones are commodity objects now. Within a given price point, all phones are functionally pretty much the same as all other phones.

      So the only thing left to compete on is the stupid, barely meaningful stuff.

      Frankly I could give a shit about how pretty the iPhone looks. I'd gladly swap out the expensive industrial design to save money.

      Me too, emphatically. But all that means is that I'm not in the market that Apple is wanting to target.

  35. The iPhone "crotch" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I'm not going to develop around this iPhone "crotch". Moving on.

  36. Re:Apple continues to degrade functionality by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    I agree.

    I could actually see a way that Apple could make use of that space that isn't fugly. My main issue is that they're putting the notification bar up there.

    But if they put the notification bar below the notch, and used the "ears" for something else -- maybe user-customizable super-important priority indicators -- that could work. The "ears" remain black most of the time, but light up when the super-notification happens.

  37. Tell me what youe see... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    TFA provides a Rorschach Test -- no not the guy from Watchmen -- of mobile phones, but with right and wrong answers..

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  38. Just Accept It - Not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This notch is about as stupid as removing the headphone jack. Apple has so much money, it can release a crap o' design and expect everyone to just accept it.

  39. Verified - "real" videos do not go under bar on X by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    In the iPhone X simulator, if you load up YouTube and play pretty much any video, then go full screen - you get black bars at both sides of the screen because most videos are not that wide...

    A few really wide movies (like Hateful Eight) would probably go under the bar. But most widescreen movies would not.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  40. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The Essential Phone was the first to do a notch, although it is much smaller. It generally seems to be fine, not annoying or problematic or distracting.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  41. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by seinman · · Score: 1

    Not shown in this video: the fact that it's an optional view. The other option? Video zoomed out enough to not be cut off by edges and corners, with black bars where necessary. Since the phone has an aspect ratio of 19.5:9 and most videos are 16:9, the unobscured view will be the default view most of the time anyway.

  42. Apple: The Trump Towers of Design by michaelcole · · Score: 1

    Also, "the crotch" is a funnier name for it.

  43. Re:Apple continues to degrade functionality by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    I think what they have done with the status bar is a decent design decision. But the design really goes off the rails in Landscape mode. Just look at the browser, where Apple insist on not hiding the notch and corners with black bars on either side of the page (which would make the screen look narrower, which is fine). Instead they put white bars on the sides, making the notch really stand out while not serving any other useful purpose, reducing readability and breaking every web page's visual flow in the process.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  44. Re:Apple continues to degrade functionality by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    ... maybe user-customizable super-important priority indicators ...

    "User-Customizable"? You do realize this is Apple we're talking about, right? To the folks in Cupertino, what you're suggesting is tantamount to painting a mustache on the Mona Lisa.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  45. LMAO..."design" by p51d007 · · Score: 2

    In the past few years, cell phone makers appear to have "embraced" the fashion design world, in the manufacturing of a tool, namely the smartphone. Watch just about every announcement, read pretty much any story about a new smartphone, and what's typically the #1 thing they announce? How fashionable, stylish, colorful and slim it is. Heck, if they even mention it, it is at the BOTTOM of the article, on how well it works in it's name...AS A PHONE. You have stupid stories about how "ugly" bezels are, how it detracts from the design to have a hideous camera bump on the back. Instead of having a good tool, they have relegated the smartphone, to the red carpet runways of the hollyWEIRD crowd. It's now nothing more than a status/fashion symbol. Can't wait for the low attention span crowd to move on to something else to screw up, and the smartphone will be off it's silly diet, allowed to wolf down a few pizzas, some cheese fries, gain some WEIGHT. Thicken up the smartphones, put back the LARGER batteries, add some slight bezels to hopefully stave off any impact to the edge of the phone, cracking the screen, place a retractable 5-10x zoom lens and larger camera sensor on the back. This fashion icon crap, is nothing more than a way for manufacturers to jack up the price even more because morons continue to buy into the "fashionable/slim/colorful/stylish" crap. With build costs of the flagships (Apple/Samsung) of around $300 dollars, but "commanding" prices above $1,000 dollars now, you'd thing people would demand the price come back down. Heck, people claim pharmaceutical, oil companies and other are ripping people off, but no one blinks an eye, to overpay for a smartphone.

    1. Re:LMAO..."design" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's cheap phones available. People pay more for the nice phones, because $1000 for something you use for hours a day for several years is really not that much. If you keep it for 2 years it's a dollar and a half a day, big deal.

      They have had attempts to sell bigger phones (say, with a 1" photo sensor) and nobody buys them, because you carry it around in your pocket all day of course.

    2. Re:LMAO..."design" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the past few years, cell phone makers appear to have "embraced" the fashion design world, in the manufacturing
      of a tool, namely the smartphone. Watch just about every announcement, read pretty much any story about a new
      smartphone, and what's typically the #1 thing they announce? How fashionable, stylish, colorful and slim it is.
      Heck, if they even mention it, it is at the BOTTOM of the article, on how well it works in it's name...AS A PHONE.
      You have stupid stories about how "ugly" bezels are, how it detracts from the design to have a hideous camera bump
      on the back. Instead of having a good tool, they have relegated the smartphone, to the red carpet runways of the hollyWEIRD
      crowd. It's now nothing more than a status/fashion symbol.
      Can't wait for the low attention span crowd to move on to something else to screw up, and the smartphone will be off it's
      silly diet, allowed to wolf down a few pizzas, some cheese fries, gain some WEIGHT. Thicken up the smartphones, put back the
      LARGER batteries, add some slight bezels to hopefully stave off any impact to the edge of the phone, cracking the screen, place
      a retractable 5-10x zoom lens and larger camera sensor on the back.
      This fashion icon crap, is nothing more than a way for manufacturers to jack up the price even more because morons continue to
      buy into the "fashionable/slim/colorful/stylish" crap.
      With build costs of the flagships (Apple/Samsung) of around $300 dollars, but "commanding" prices above $1,000 dollars now, you'd
      thing people would demand the price come back down.
      Heck, people claim pharmaceutical, oil companies and other are ripping people off, but no one blinks an eye, to overpay for a smartphone.

      Pharmaceuticals can mean the difference between life and death for some people. Oil can mean the difference between being able to get to work and put food on the table and losing your livelihood. No one needs an iPhone X. That's the difference. - Abraham Lincoln

  46. "Unique, simple, recognizable?" by psmoot · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you all but I find it really hard to tell my Samsung phone from an iPhone these days. Maybe to a designer a circle versus oval home button jumps out like a flashing red light. To me, a mere mortal, I have to look carefully to tell which is which. They're both white rectangles with a button on the bottom and a rectangular screen.

    As to the notch making an iPhone instantly recognizable again, that sounds like wishful thinking. They're still both going to be rounded white rectangles with a rectangular screen. "Oh yeah, that one has a little piece of something near the top, must be an iPhone."

    1. Re: "Unique, simple, recognizable?" by joh · · Score: 1

      No, it's not just a rectangular screen: The X has a screen with rounded corners that fit with the rounded corners of the case in such a way that it has a bezel with a constant width all around (except the notch of course).

      Especially with AR apps this helps with creating the impression of not looking at a display, but through an empty frame.

      It's actually a clever design and definitely highly recognizable. You will be able to look at half a dozen smartphones with (in some way) minimal bezels but you will immediately see which one of them is the iPhone.

    2. Re: "Unique, simple, recognizable?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung has already had these rounded corner screens with their phones. It is samsung after all who is making the oled panels in these phones.

      The gimmick i dont like about these new curved screen corners, its like taking a step back to the days of the CRT where content producers had to deal with overscan and had to have safe video areas.

      Now on places like youtube where a channel might have a small logo in the corner of their video, they will have to begin adhering to a safe video area to keep stuff like that from getting cropped in the curve. Where as before it was pretty much guaranteed to be visible even if the logo butted up to the farthest corner pixel of the video. since pretty much all phones, monitors, tvs have completely eliminated over scan until now.

  47. Re:Now see here, fuckhead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, cannoli.

  48. Re:Apple continues to degrade functionality by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    I think what they have done with the status bar is a decent design decision.

    My problem with it is that it reduces the size of the notification bar by half, and then cuts that half in half again. This seriously reduces the utility of the bar, as well as simply looking bad.

  49. Re: Seems like non-Apple people care more about lo by joh · · Score: 1

    The notch only obscures the video if you zoom in, otherwise you get black bars.

  50. So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you have no problem with a big top bezel.

    1. Re:So in other words... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      You get the big top bezel no matter what. The only question is whether or not the top edge of the display is cut in half by the bezel.

  51. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Does that mean Apple can't patent this and Samsung can copy it?

    --
    No sig today...
  52. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by c · · Score: 1

    I thought Apple people were the ones who cared about superficial looks, but that does not appear to be the case.

    I suspect more than a bit of it is turnaround for the ribbing the Apple people were giving to the Moto 360 watch's "flat tire".

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  53. "That's Courage"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never confuse courage with stupidity....

  54. Re: Now see here, fuckhead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, capicola.

  55. Permanent? Hardly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Article doesn't even know what they talk about.

    You know most companies (APL and Samsung included) have under-screen patents, right? This notch is TEMPORARY. You painstakingly develop your software to account for it, then you'll have to undo it in 1 or 2 years (whenever Samsung decides to do it)

  56. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shocker!!!! Major apple fanboi say "ill live with the compromise"

  57. Re: Seems like non-Apple people care more about lo by anegg · · Score: 1

    It's not even a "notch"; its substantial width precludes that term being the correct way to describe it, except in the poorly educated mind of the journalist who first referred to it in that fashion. It's a sensor bar that doesn't extend all the way across the phone, with little display areas extending up on both sides for some reason. And getting worked up about it seems like a tempest in a teapot. It is remotely possible that it is a marketing ploy to gain mindshare/free publicity.

  58. The many dangers of FaceID by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    FaceID is also going to work great for government agents trying to get access to your device. Now all they have to do is have you look at the phone. It's just as bad as the fingerprint reader is as far as legally compelled unlocking goes (at least in the U.S.).

    I get that FaceID is really for the people who wander around with their phones totally unlocked, but lets not pretend it's a secure way to protect your device. You also open yourself up to being remotely surveilled by not blocking the forward-facing camera. Just keep it simple and use a long password that can't be guessed.

    1. Re:The many dangers of FaceID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Obvious android fanboy here. It's just like touchID. You can disable it in the same way, so that a federal agent can't unlock your phone by having you look at it.

      Honestly, anyone that think the government doesn't already have all the info they want about you without unlocking your phone is in denial. They already have root access to the backbone routers, which is well documented. They already can root your windows system in a few minutes. Freaking out over the phone is a bit silly.

  59. So the real headline is... by hackel · · Score: 1

    Marco Arment is an idiot Apple fanboy. Great, thanks Slashdot!

    "Most important, most successful, and most recognizable tech product that the world has ever seen" my ass. Fuck you, Marco. You don't seem to have a clue what your'e talking about. What a disgusting sellout to the king of proprietary software.

  60. The opposite is true by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    FaceID is also going to work great for government agents trying to get access to your device. Now all they have to do is have you look at the phone.

    You are actually exactly backwards on this issue:

    1) If you just shut your eyes or look away it will not unlock.

    2) On the TouchID phones you can put it in passcode only mode with five taps on the lock button. But with the X, you just squeeze the power and either volume button at the same time as you are handing the phone over to someone, and it goes into passcode only mode - so even easier and not obvious what you are doing.

    It's just as bad as the fingerprint reader is as far as legally compelled unlocking goes (at least in the U.S.).

    The thing is both are really useful, and with iOS11 both are easily temporarily disabled so you can have convince while staying safe legally, too.

    lets not pretend it's a secure way to protect your device.

    How is it NOT secure?

    You also open yourself up to being remotely surveilled by not blocking the forward-facing camera.

    Not on an iPhone you do not, because apps have no access to the camera when backgrounded.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The opposite is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) If you just shut your eyes or look away it will not unlock.

      Which is easier : not typing your password or keeping your eyes closed indefinitely?

  61. Duct tape by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just put a piece of duct tape over my old Iphone 6 so everyone will think it's an iphone X

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  62. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought Apple people were the ones who cared about superficial looks, but that does not appear to be the case.

    This is how a fanboy admits that Apple really fucked up the aesthetics.

    But who does that from a tab bar, honestly.

    "It's not bad ergonomics if I can train myself to stop doing it."

  63. In software? Are you kidding? by aglider · · Score: 1

    That’s why Apple has made no effort to hide the notch in software

    Please, Marco, elaborate more on this idea.
    I am really looking forward to eat you...

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  64. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    This is how a fanboy admits that Apple really fucked up the aesthetics.

    That's how a hater covers up the fact his position is untenable.

    I've said the same thing every time someone has complained about how an Apple product looks. I honestly do not care about looks tat much, I care about functionality. That is why I, and so many other people, are Apple users. Because in the end the hardware is more about function and design than looks.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  65. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    "It's not bad ergonomics if I can train myself to stop doing it."

    So to scroll up on a table on screen, you start by pressing on a tab bar below the table then swiping up?

    Even on UI for existing phones, that would select a different tab before it scrolled anything... so if you do that you must be a blithering moron.

    But then, you are an Apple Hater so I guess that goes without saying.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  66. Where is the compromise? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I don't see a compromise in the design at all. The screen is so tall comparatively it's not like that notch imposes into the screen in any significant way for using any apps (which even if you remove the notch area of the screen still have more vertical real estate than they would on the normal phones). And as I noted above, pretty much any video you will ever play on the phone will not underlap the bar in landscape due to the aspect ratio.

    So where is the compromise? Or did you just come here to cackle about Apple because your heart is full of hate you must express in some way?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Where is the compromise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So dramatic there sally.

    2. Re:Where is the compromise? by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The compromise is that it's asymmetrical from top to bottom, or from side to side in landscape. Rounded corners are ridiculous too IMO -- they certainly weren't a "feature" in CRTs -- but at least they seem like a deliberate choice. The notch feels like they tried to cram too much on the front of the phone. Personally I would have preferred removing everything from the front except a fingerprint-through-glass sensor. If an edge-to-edge screen is *that* important, then do it all the way. If it's not, then leave a bezel. A notch is a half-assed compromise.

  67. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Swiping from the edge has always been a different gesture from swiping fully on he screen. Up to now, swiping from the bottom edge brings up a settings panel. So no, no one would ever have used that gesture to scroll. The video is jut wrong.

    But then it was made more for laughs than accuracy.

  68. Corrections to your Misconceptions by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Why on earth are you grabbing your phone on the front and back like a freak?

    I grab it by the bottom (because that's what's closest to my hand in my pocket) and sometimes by thumb hits the home button, unlocking to home. You probably do not have a Plus, which generally does not have enough room in a pocket to reach around it.

    So if you put your phone down on the table, you now have to be extra careful nobody swipes your super-expensive phone. It will be unlocked and usable by anybody.

    Sigh. Not while I'm not looking at it, when it automatically locks again. I realize living in your moms basement you may bot be aware what normal people do, but putting a phone on a table is pretty common these days.

    That's pretty stupid. No prompt to verify you want to do?

    It's a lot more stupid of you to not even read what I wrote, which was there would still be a prompt, just no delay to read the finger as there is now. It's even MORE stupid of you to critique a system where you apparently have no idea how it functions now, nor how it will change.

    Or they could have simply gon with a 98% bezel-less phone instead of 99% and not have the notch?

    Sure, but then they'd have a vastly inferior phone generally, and more specifically one that has vastly inferior convenience around unlocking while remaining secure.

    I'll let you have the last response because idiots always have to yabber on about whatever.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Corrections to your Misconceptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure have a problem with being wrong.

  69. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    The funny thing about the notch to me is I don't really care about it

    It's interesting to see the very mixed responses. Some people don't care, others (like me) think it's a blemish. It's like something is stuck to the screen and I can't get it off.

    It would be interesting if there's any relationship between these views and typical screen designs the viewers are used to. e.g. I have rectangular screens on all my devices. I wonder if someone with e.g. a Galaxy Gear watch or similar device with a non rectangular screens feel the same way. But personally it looks wrong, and the mild OCD in me wants to clean that black goo away or return the phone with the obvious area of dead pixels.

  70. Re:Apple continues to degrade functionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uhhh i can read the numbers of the diallling pad just fine. I can also hear the call just fine. Whats the problem again?

  71. Re: Now see here, fuckhead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not quite, I'm a Capricorn.

  72. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Notch + curved corners + FaceID - TouchID = first iPhone I won't be buying, ever.

  73. Re:Apple continues to degrade functionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what apple should have done. Basically made those two bulges into always on notification areas for status info. And lock the OS and APPs into a true rectangular part of the screen.

    You could then have those status and notifications stay always visible even if you were in a full screen video or game. However maybe significantly dim them as to not be distracting from the main content.

    It might have been useful for notification info while the phone is off much like the colored notification LED on samsung phones which you can assign colors to different app notifications like in my case i use green for txt messages, yellow for emails, blue for facebook, and so on. So while working if i notice my phone vibrate on my desk i can just glance over and see what color the flashing light is. I might be more inclined to check a flashing green or yellow led, vs say the blue facebook notification

  74. Yes Minister by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the Yes Minister use of courageous

    Sir Humphrey: If you want to be really sure that the Minister doesn't accept it, you must say the decision is "courageous".

    Bernard: And that's worse than "controversial"?

    Sir Humphrey: Oh, yes! "Controversial" only means "this will lose you votes". "Courageous" means "this will lose you the election"!

  75. But it's not by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The compromise is that it's asymmetrical from top to bottom

    How is that a "compromise" when iPhones have always been that way?

    The black bars at top/bottom have been around the same size but had different features (like a home button on bottom).

    or from side to side in landscape

    But again it's really not. Watching any video in landscape and you get equal black bars on either side, except if you opt to fill the entire screen and chop off the bottom and top of the video - but who does that? And if they choose to, why would it matter if a little more it chopped off another edge? Almost no-one uses phones landscape normally.

    The notch feels like they tried to cram too much on the front of the phone

    No, they needed enough space to implement an actually functional FaceID. It is not "too much" if it actually works as well if it looks like it does, it certainly would be "too little" if they removed some of the sensors and the feature were not reliable.

    That again is not a compromise, because they put what they needed up there in the space it took to hold it. A compromise would have been to make the top bar smaller or drop FaceID.

    Personally I would have preferred removing everything from the front except a fingerprint-through-glass sensor.

    As I said elsewhere a fingerprint sensor is really not nearly as good in the end as FaceID implemented right, which has a number of benefits over a fingerprint sensor.

    Apple realized this and simply stopped working on the fingerprint-through-glass sensor, as they realized it was no longer needed.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  76. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Every other screen I have is rectangular, and I personally thought the Gear flat tire thing was horrible. But that was an intrusion into the usable space of the screen.

    The iPhone X is so tall that the notch is not really imposing on the usable area; to me the screens to the side of the note seem like additions preventing the status bar from having to take up the top of the screen, rather than the notch subtracting anything.

    Perhaps that is the difference, some see more where others see less.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  77. Re: Seems like non-Apple people care more about lo by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    When I first read the story about a "notch" I fully expected to see the entire case notched out in a ridiculous attempt to differentiate and patent a new design. Seeing the stupid bar across the screen led to both disappointment and restoration of my faith in the human race.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  78. That writing style is what makes people hate Apple by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    Although Apple didn't write it themselves, their fans and critics just have to write stupid bullshit like that, about how they've changed the landscape, how brave they were, blah blah.

    At the end of the stupid fucking day, if Apple could have managed to make that screen have a speaker, all those cameras and sensors, without the bar, of COURSE THEY would have fucking done it!

    Stupidity and fanboyism.
    Oh and I like home buttons and headphone jacks personally, no sale.

  79. Step 1: get used to the notch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 2: Surprise! Now we put unavoidable ads there.
    Step 3: Profit!

  80. Re:Now see here, fuckhead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, capsaicin.

  81. The hyperbole is strong in this one by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

    > most important, most successful, and most recognizable tech product that the world has ever seen

    I think someone might have something to say about that.

  82. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    The iPhone X is so tall that the notch is not really imposing on the usable area

    Oh I agree with that. I don't think it is taking anything away functionally. It's just purely a visual ... blemish in my eyes. An otherwise rectangular screen with something that I would historically have associated with an area of failed pixels. It's either subtle OCD on my behalf or conditioning of expecting a rectangular screen to show all the pixels within it's border.

    Either way I can't get past it. The essential phone has a similar notch and I can't help wondering (even though I know better) if that notch is obscuring a notification icon.

  83. Re:Seems like non-Apple people care more about loo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most important part of the video, the reason I linked to it, is the part where that notch is clearly obtrusive when watching photos or videos.

    Actually, that's Apple deliberately showing the notch, the default is that you don't see it.

    https://twitter.com/BenBajarin/status/908772648489967621

    https://au.finance.yahoo.com/n...

  84. just wait 1 year, let's see iphone 9 will not have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this notch any more.