Slashdot Mirror
Court Rules That Imported Solar Panels Are Bad For US Manufacturing (theverge.com)
The International Trade Commission has ruled that American companies are being hurt by cheap solar panels from overseas, providing an opportunity for President Donald Trump to tax imports from countries like China. The Verge reports: Today's unanimous decision ruled that the companies SolarWorld Americans and Suniva were struggling financially not because of their own poor management, but because they couldn't compete with cheap panels from countries like China, Mexico, and South Korea. Suniva is now suggesting import duties of 40 cents a watt for solar cells, and a floor price of 78 cents a watt for panels. (Right now, the average floor price, worldwide, for panels is about 32 cents.) The Solar Energy Industries Association warned that implementing these suggestions could end up doubling the price of solar, thus destroying demand and causing Americans to lose their jobs.
We'll get those coal miners their jobs back, you just wait and see. #crookedHillaryLoses
After all, what's more important - helping cut the costs to increase adoption and cut CO2 emissions, or getting the third vacation home for some local solar company CEO?
That's all solar is - energy from somewhere else!
For Consumers.
Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
This is a seriously complicated issue. Proper economic modeling can give us a good idea of how to proceed, but political greed will finance whatever spin it may take to move mass opinion in the direction of short term profit for the few people who can afford the spin doctors. Solar futures are now in jeopardy for the US. Sigh.
On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
This sounds great until you think of the ramifications of more expensive solar panels
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...
Quite a lot of solar adoption is driven not by a commitment to fighting global warming or pollution in general but by savings. Make the panels more expensive and adoption rates will drop significantly.
I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
USA! and when it comes down to it we need to cut off china
There are FAR more people employed in the sale and instillation of solar panel than there are in manufacturing.
Raising the price of panels will kill those jobs.
Stupid and shortsighted. Protect a few manufacturing job at companies that can't compete, and lose orders of magnitude more jobs in sales, and instillation.
The only way US manufacturing can compete is through automation. Which means almost no one will be employed in manufacturing.
"The International Trade Commission" is a US group, it has no international mandate. Enacting tariffs will result in the affected countries enacting retaliatory tariffs on US made goods. More US jobs lost. "Dumb and Dumber"
Free markets are a means to an end. They are often very effective at helping us towards our goals, but they are NOT the goals.
The goal ought to be roughly: do whatever maximizes the portion of non-lazy workers who are able to fully support a modest family on a single income.
Usually that means we support business and free trade, but don't confuse business or free trade for the goal.
"Suniva is now suggesting import duties of 40 cents a watt for solar cells, and a floor price of 78 cents a watt for panels. (Right now, the average floor price, worldwide, for panels is about 32 cents.)" The market to purchase solar panels in the States is rigged already. Tax breaks, subsidies, grants, mandates for utilities to buy excess power at market rates, etc. All to promote solar and make it more "affordable." I ask...what is more affordable than hordes of people making less than $2 an hour to stamp panels out...all under the roof of a coal powered factory?
Lots of manufacturing jobs have left the USA because it's more expensive to manufacture here. So why pick on solar? Are the foreign solar companies dumping, or are the foreign governments subsidizing, with the aim of driving US companies out of the market? If so, I see the argument for tariffs, but there's nothing about dumping or subsidies in the ruling as far as I can see.
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
Will the price of non-domestic panels still be lower than domestic after tariffs?
Another question is how much the coal/natural gas lobby's have donated to ensure this ruling?
If we can burn coal, or oil, or natural gas, or corncobs to produce cheap electricity does it really matter? If coal becomes a major energy source, I would expect electrical costs to drop significantly. The price probably won't though, because profit....
Are Mexico, Canada and South Korea dumping solar panels for less than cost of production? Are they using slave labor? Do employees work in hazardous conditions?
If not please go fuck yourselves.
For over 50 years now, we've had a stiff tariff on imported light trucks. What was the outcome? The USA is the pickup truck capital of the world.
It looks like with this tariff, we can eventually be the kings solar panel as well. All we need is the right marketing strategy.
If we can get people to pay over $60K for a pickup, we can also get them to support solar panels with high profit margins. A good start would be to market "heavy duty" panels and promote them as an enabler of rugged individualism.
Styling will also be key: for example maybe carbon-fiber frames, menacing hexagonal honeycomb collector grids, and prominent oversized exposed heat sinks on the electronics. Who wouldn't want the most bad-assed roof on their block?
You never know, people might start installing several times the solar capacity they would ever use just so they can brag about their peak kilowatt capacities.
Well, I know which companies to avoid for solar panels.
Not my problem you allowed China to take over REE market while you let big oil play the protectionist racket here.
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
There are FAR more people employed in the sale and instillation of solar panel than there are in manufacturing. Raising the price of panels will kill those jobs.
But how many of those jobs are held by US citizens or holders of work visas and how many are "undocumented" aliens?
Not saying the latter's jobs don't matter. AM saying that, as far as jobs for the US citizen voters who elected Trump on the promise of more jobs for US citizens (and others with legal work status), job losses for that group don't count. So your argument won't convince them.
Also AM saying that raising the prices can retard other parts of the economy, so it's not that simple.
(Also saying I was planning to buy a couple pallets of solar panels now that they were down into the $0.30/W range - providing enough generation to make my retirement home grid-independent - and this might foul that up. Sigh. It will be interesting to see how it works out.)
"The International Trade Commission" is a US group, it has no international mandate.
Neither does the US presidency, judiciary, congress, or the raft of federal agencies, of which this is one. Per wikipedia:
Saying "it has no international mandate" may make it SOUND like it's some private group, rather than a fully functional and authorized part of the government. But it doesn't make it any less legitimate than any other part of the government.
International relations are an anarchy. Each sovereign country's governmental components don't require any "mandate" from any outside-the-country persons, groups, or governments to be as legitimate as any other governmental component.
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
Oil and Coal industries..
In fact, all the battles over solar have been pretty much sponsored by oil/gas/coal companies not wanting competition (understandable since the source is "free", so outside of the initial implementation, no one needs them).
I promise you, the day they figure out a way to charge for solar rays is the day they go whole hog for solar.
God made the Idiot for practice, and then He made the School Board -- Mark Twain Look for http://Thebar.steelbeachca
or most of Michigan? Hell, I remember seeing a report where a charity that specialized in medical aid to developing nations was down in Alabama.
If you live in one of the successful cities (New York, Dallas, Phoenix, Los Angelos, etc) it's easy to forget and ignore what a hell hole large swaths of the US became when the manufacturing jobs went overseas. That's also exactly why Trump won. He didn't forget that. He capitalized on it.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
I don't want their cheap panels because they're made with borderline slave labor. We can make more than enough panels here just fine while supporting good middle class jobs and doing it without a heavily abused workforce.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
if those foreign solar panels were made with workers that had an equivalent standard of living as the same American? If they breathed clean air, didn't want for clean water and worked 40 hours a week?
Tariffs can have another effect: forcing countries to compete _fairly_. This isn't a question of one country doing better than another. This is one country willing to abuse it's workers more (China, I'm lookin' at you especially).
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
unless you're an idiot. My buddy bought one for $15k, but 200,000 miles on it, got hit, decided he wanted a Prius and got $10k from the settlement _just_for_the_truck.
Americans are leaders in light Trucks because they're incredibly well made, cheap and hold their value. Tariffs made that possible because our industry wasn't crushed by the cheap labor of a country willing to abuse it's workers.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Yup. And Elon is ready to unveil an electric one in a few weeks.
A semi-truck.
I.e. A semi-trailer truck.
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
Tesla Semi truck unveil & test ride tentatively scheduled for Oct 26th in Hawthorne. Worth seeing this beast in person. It's unreal.
4:20 PM - 13 Sep 2017
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
Businesses rally behind the "free market" when it suits then, but when that same free market bites them in the ass, they run crying to the government for relief.
I'm interested to know why costs in the US are so high. One could decry cheap labour from China and Mexico, but in that case, why is South Korea included in the list of countries that are keeping prices down? Moreover, solar panel manufacturing is a largely-automated process, pushing labour costs down even more...
Sounds like mismanagement to me...
... but we don't want the Irish.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
I promise you, the day they figure out a way to charge for solar rays is the day they go whole hog for solar.
They have essentially managed to do this in Florida. With any luck, though, Florida will get washed into the ocean shortly.
The Electoral College has made me bloodthirsty. It's not enough for people to get a clue, whole states have to be wiped off the map in order for things to get better.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Thou shall not generate thy own electricity and power thy dwelling after massive hurricanes, or else! Omen! (evil music continues...)
Please explain...
-----
Sorry, I'm only a 1336 h4x0r.
It's why she lost. She didn't campaign in the rust belt swing states. There were stories of the DNC down there freaking out because nobody was showing up to help them win. She bought into that "Blue Firewall" nonsense and figured since the voted Obama they'd vote for her. She lost by a hair's breath. All she had to do to win was stop wasting time in Arizona and hit the pavement in the states that mattered.
But well, she always was arrogant as heck. That was one of the main faults people sited for not liking her, and well, elections are popularity contests...
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Face it. We live inside what is essentially an economic Iron Curtain.
Have gnu, will travel.
Seriously? Lets hurt the solar market to support two companies that can't get lower prices?
"providing an opportunity for President Donald Trump to tax imports from countries like China"
Awwww, Little Donnie Two Scoops is gonna start a trade was with China...how adorable!
I'm sure everyone will benefit from this latest bout of "my micro-dick is bigger than your micro-dick" diplomacy. Especially the Chinese corporations.
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
When a company can not compete the expectation is that they go under. I suspect that the typical failure in industry these days is because a company failed to automate properly. No longer can the price of labor be a valid excuse. Sometimes older company leaders resist new ways and that kills the company. But more often it is the price or difficulty of getting enough money to properly set up a company as changes are expensive. The poor workers suffer while the owners simply move their investment money to a more profitable investment. If anything we need financial programs to support displaced workers and i do not mean get by types of funding them but real, livable wages for all workers whether they are working or not.
The full title being the United States International Trade Commission and in this case functioning as the lobbying arm of the native US solar power industry. What's this self serving political waffle doing on a technology forum.
.. federal agency of the United States .. The President nominates and the U.S. Senate confirms the six commissioners who make up the USITC"
"The United States International Trade Commission is an
Gallium arsenide makes some of the most efficient single junction solar cells. Arsenic isn't among "some of the most toxic chemicals known to man" but it is still plenty poisonous. Your point about ordinary solar panels is, of course, correct.
Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
Is that your final solution?
Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
Is that your final solution?
Looks like. I might have made a modest proposal instead, but the retirees are too tough and stringy.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Uh . . . the foreign competition isn't selling to U.S. at a loss, not being subsidized, selling a product that doesn't have a home country resource advantage (silicon hard to get?), is made mostly without much labor input. What's the problem?
Uh . . . the foreign competition isn't selling at a loss, even with overseas shipping costs, they aren't being subsidized, the raw materials aren't hard to get (silicon?), they are made by automated machinery and don't need much in the way of labor input. What's the problem? Down the road costs for the existing labor? Yeah . . . that's it (I say, while pulling U.S. manufacturer's fat out of the fire).