Slashdot Mirror


Department of Justice Demands Facebook Information From 'Anti-Administration Activists' (cnn.com)

PopeRatzo shares a report from CNN: Trump administration lawyers are demanding the private account information of potentially thousands of Facebook users in three separate search warrants served on the social media giant, according to court documents obtained by CNN. The warrants specifically target the accounts of three Facebook users who are described by their attorneys as "anti-administration activists who have spoken out at organized events, and who are generally very critical of this administration's policies." One of those users, Emmelia Talarico, operated the disruptj20 page where Inauguration Day protests were organized and discussed; the page was visited by an estimated 6,000 users whose identities the government would have access to if Facebook hands over the information sought in the search warrants. In court filings, Talarico says if her account information was given to the government, officials would have access to her "personal passwords, security questions and answers, and credit card information," plus "the private lists of invitees and attendees to multiple political events sponsored by the page."

3 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Not right by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Informative

    More info needed, especially when it is a CNN article.

    http://fortune.com/2017/09/29/...

    https://lawnewz.com/crazy/doj-...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  2. Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was busted? by Xenographic · · Score: 5, Informative

    I note that you conveniently leave out the part where #disruptj20 was caught on camera plotting to attack people at the inaugural ball? Or how they planned to chain trains and otherwise shut down DC? Have we forgotten about violent assaults like the woman whose hair was lit on fire?

    They're investigating all of the people who were plotting violent attacks, including the planned release of butyric acid into the ventilation systems of the ball. Oh, that's just a "stink bomb" you say, but c'mon, really? You expect people to identify which acid they're breathing in and not be forced to evacuate the building into a pile of police and protesters on a freezing cold day?

    Sorry, but this is a criminal act that they're investigating. They're allowed to find out who was involved in it and given that #disruptj20 was criminal, they have reasonable suspicion to look at anyone involved. You don't get to plot crimes and then complain because the police are investigating. They're going after #disruptj20 because the leaders of it were caught planning criminal activity, not because they criticized the president.

    The people who tried to attack others at the inauguration knew or should've known what they were getting into.

  3. #disruptj20 tried to light this "witch" on fire by Xenographic · · Score: 3, Informative

    > The gov't should investigate people based on their threat risk

    Why do you think they aren't?

    Here's video evidence of some of the crimes #disruptj20 was plotting:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHZSfhd1X_8
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIjbkYLI1nY

    And here is one of those 'peaceful protesters' at the inauguration lighting a lady's hair on fire:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY5WTDgV4ik

    There's no reason for society to pick & choose, they should arrest ALL people plotting or performing violent acts.