Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Is Shipping Hundreds of Powerwall Batteries To Puerto Rico (futurism.com)

schwit1 quotes a report from Futurism: In a continued streak of goodwill during this year's devastating hurricane season, Tesla has been shipping hundreds of its Powerwall batteries to Puerto Rico in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria. Since the hurricane hit on 20 September, much of the U.S. territory has been left without power -- about 97 percent, as of 27 September -- hampering residents' access to drinkable water, perishable food, and air conditioning. The island's hospitals are struggling to keep generators running as diesel fuel dwindles. Installed by employees in Puerto Rico, Tesla's batteries could be paired with solar panels in order to store electricity for the territory, whose energy grid may need up to six months to be fully repaired. Several power banks have already arrived to the island, and more are en route.

167 comments

  1. Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It will be hard to set up enough solar panels quickly to charge powerwalls, but in the meantime they could be charged at locations with power or generators, then moved to points of use. A small generator charging a battery can often be as useful as a larger generator.

    1. Re:Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they could use wind power
      apparently they have plenty
      konya wa hurricane

    2. Re:Maybe use with gens by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:Maybe use with gens by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Would be better if Tesla would pay all the Puerto Rican truck drivers who are on strike and refuse to make deliveries of the thousands of containers of supplies until they are paid better.

      This has been debunked as fake news. It didn't happen. Stop spreading lies.

    4. Re:Maybe use with gens by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or just simply, Snopes:

      Did Puerto Rico's Teamsters Union Go on Strike During Hurricane Maria Relief Efforts?
      Reports that truck drivers are on strike in Puerto Rico are false -- Teamsters have asked mainland truckers to distribute supplies in the U.S. territory. ...

      The Conservative Treehouse then went on to claim, again falsely, that the cause of this shortfall in truck drivers was a deliberate, coordinated strike action by the local Teamsters union. Similar claims were also made by the Gateway Pundit and entrepreneur Kambree Kawahine Koa.

      The International Brotherhood of Teamsters rejected these claims entirely, telling us the reports were “fake news” and adding that the Teamsters Local 901 in Puerto Rico was “doing everything but refuse to help” in relief efforts.

      In a statement, Teamsters General President Jim Hoffa called the reports “nothing but lies”: ...

      Indeed, Colonel Michael Valle — one of the sources cited by the Conservative Treehouse — went on to tell the Huffington Post:

      There should be zero blame on the drivers. They can’t get to work, the infrastructure is destroyed, they can’t get fuel themselves, and they can’t call us for help because there’s no communication.

      ...

      A CNBC report cited in the Conservative Treehouse post also undermines the claim that there was a strike. As the reporter explains:

      There are 3,000 cargo containers here at Crowley, one of the biggest shippers in Puerto RicoHere’s the problem – the truck drivers can’t get to the terminal to get their containers outYou’re looking at truck drivers who can’t be reached by their businesses by cell phone, they don’t have the gas to get to work, and then even when they do get to work, their semi-trucks don’t have fuel. The problem is the supply chain.

      Etc, etc, etc.

      Now, what you should be asking yourself right now is, "What sort of bullshit places have I been getting my information from that sold me on this story? What other bullshit have they sold me on over the years? What other bullshit do I currently believe that they sold me on?"

      --
      "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
    5. Re:Maybe use with gens by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

      Which is funny given the MediaMatters take on it that it was the Republicans that were giving that excuse, when I saw Democrats explaining the incompetence of the officials in Puerto Rico, including one vocal mayor who couldn't be bothered to attend logistics meetings but managed to get custom shirt and hat made.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re:Maybe use with gens by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Informative

      Solar panels are relatively light and cheap, and Puerto Rico has a lot of solar power. This is a good idea, a quick way to get usable power in place fast.

      The storage is the tough part, and that's the part the powerwall is good for. There's already 88 MW of distributed solar and 127 MW of utility-scale solar available in Puerto Rico
      https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/the-solar-industry-wants-to-help-puerto-rico.

      https://cleantechnica.com/2017/10/01/tesla-powerwalls-solar-panels-sent-puerto-rico/

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    7. Re: Maybe use with gens by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      They're more trustworthy than anonymous cowards, that's for sure.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    8. Re:Maybe use with gens by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Would be better if Tesla would pay all the Puerto Rican truck drivers who are on strike and refuse to make deliveries of the thousands of containers of supplies until they are paid better.

      False. They aren't on strike, they just can't walk to work from where they live.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    9. Re:Maybe use with gens by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

      one vocal mayor who couldn't be bothered to attend logistics meetings

      That is Carmen Yulin Cruz, the mayor of San Juan.

      1. She criticized the Trump administration for its inefficiency.

      2. Trump attacked her as incompetent.

      3. Democrats and the media attacked Trump for picking on her.

      4. Other mayors in PR said that she is indeed incompetent.

      I don't know what happened after that because I ran out of popcorn.

    10. Re: Maybe use with gens by eriks · · Score: 4, Informative

      It shouldn't be, really. Though in this case, snopes is *ABSOLUTELY CORRECT* that there is no strike by Puerto Rican truck drivers. Period. Anyone saying there is, is simply lying. There isn't a single shred of evidence anywhere that this "story" is true, and more to the point, the whole thing is absurd. There simply isn't enough fuel for the trucks, and in many cases, there are no longer roads to drive the trucks on.

      We should be sending flotillas of ships and boats with supplies (water, food and medical supplies) anywhere along the coast where ships and supply boats can dock, or even using beaches where possible. The fact that there is not more help forthcoming from the mainland is a shame.

    11. Re:Maybe use with gens by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Now, what you should be asking yourself right now is, "What sort of bullshit places have I been getting my information from that sold me on this story? What other bullshit have they sold me on over the years? What other bullshit do I currently believe that they sold me on?"

      Fox News, Il Duce II, and Alexander Putin. Truth is irrelevant now, they are in teh dehumanizing proess so that the enemy, whoever that is, can be exterminated.

      This will probably be downvoted as a trolll, but yes, the dehumanizing process is occurring, and truth does not matter any more. A person disseminating lies can yell "Fake News" and the proles will believe him first.

      Welcome to the end times.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      4. A mayor from a different political party said that she is incompetent

      FTFY.

      Meanwhile, Puerto Ricans continue dying...

    13. Re:Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must you Post idiocy? I bet you Cry about Fake News , yet here you are posting it.

    14. Re: Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We shall feed them in Puerto Rico, we shall feed them from the seas and oceans, we shall feed them with growing confidence and growing strength from the air, we shall restore our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall feed them on the beaches, we shall feed them on the landing grounds, we shall feed them in the fields and in the streets, we shall feed them in the hills; we shall never be deterred, and if, which I do not for a moment believe, this country or a large part of it were governed by someone who couldn't give a rat's arse, then our citizens, aided and enabled by private fleets, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the US congress, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the salvation of the territories."

    15. Re:Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Adults realize that 4 does not justify 2 even if it is true. She's the mayor of a disaster-stricken city. "Attacking" her now is wrong pretty much regardless of her "competence" in the end. It's sad that Trump can't just disagree, he has to bully and name-call like a child. It's also sad that this has gotten more airtime than any real information about the assistance effort. But it's cheaper to pontificate endlessly on how things look politically than to pay reporters to do legwork.

    16. Re:Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. There are people on the Island who already have solar panels, just bring them wherever someone has panels and ask to hookup, put up a cell tower so that they get communications back up.

    17. Re: Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he fact that there is not more help forthcoming from the mainland is a shame.

      While I agree with this. I do think the consecutive hurricanes would strain any response effort.

    18. Re: Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's been debunking urban legends since the 90's. It's literately the oldest site on the internet dedicated to debunking bullshit.

    19. Re: Maybe use with gens by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Sadly, our current political leaders are no Winston Churchill.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    20. Re: Maybe use with gens by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Why is snopes considered more trustworthy than any other biased aggregator?

      Why are you copping out by throwing your hands in the air and proclaiming "there is no truth"?

      Snopes, FactCheck, the NYTimes, the WaPost, and many other "biased liberal" publications are generally very reliable, they have an established record of being much better than the opposing sources you probably favour.

      In the unusual instance where there is a major error you're free to point it out.

      But if you actually gave a damn about whether the story was correct you wouldn't be discounting reliable resources on the grounds they disagree with you.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    21. Re:Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Carmen Yulin is part of a group called Separatista (Separatist) which is basically a pro-independence group that is anti-USA but claims to be "friends". They want full control of the island while DEMANDING all the benefits of being a commonwealth (i.e., they want state rights without being a state or having to follow federal laws).

      She is also a self proclaimed friend of Venezuela's Maduro and Oscar López Rivera (a convicted terrorist that was commuted by Obama).

    22. Re: Maybe use with gens by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't be, really. Though in this case, snopes is *ABSOLUTELY CORRECT* that there is no strike by Puerto Rican truck drivers. Period. Anyone saying there is, is simply lying. There isn't a single shred of evidence anywhere that this "story" is true, and more to the point, the whole thing is absurd. There simply isn't enough fuel for the trucks, and in many cases, there are no longer roads to drive the trucks on.

      We should be sending flotillas of ships and boats with supplies (water, food and medical supplies) anywhere along the coast where ships and supply boats can dock, or even using beaches where possible. The fact that there is not more help forthcoming from the mainland is a shame.

      Too bad we don't have a Navy base there. Oh yeah, we did, until PR activists and movie stars took care of that.

    23. Re:Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, lots of people in the island of PR have solar panels ... that were totally destroyed by hurricane Maria.

      Are people really so ignorant about how fragile solar panels are? Most solar panels in the market don't survive a simple hail storm (specially the cheap Chinese kind), how the hell do you think they are going to survive winds of up-to 150 mph?

    24. Re: Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoah, whoah, whoah slow down there. A tragedy is not the time to talk about gun policy reform, but it is the time to attack Democrats.

      When isn't the time to attack Ds? The same as the time to talk about gun violence... Never.

    25. Re: Maybe use with gens by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      We should be sending flotillas of ships and boats with supplies

      We are. Enormous amounts of supplies and the personnel to help put them to work. Getting things inland over trashed roads is a problem that's being addressed about as fast as it can be.

      The fact that there is not more help forthcoming from the mainland is a shame.

      I know, right? A few months ago when we had a different administration, they had everything Puerto Rico could possibly need all staged and ready to go, with trained personnel all set to solve exactly this problem instantly if it happened. Oh, right, that's complete BS. It IS a shame that it takes a few weeks to get this sort of relief really under way ... but the people blaming the president for that reality are full of crap and they know it.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    26. Re: Maybe use with gens by kenh · · Score: 1

      they could be charged at locations with power or generators, then moved to points of use.

      Moved how, exactly?
      On what roads, exactly?
      On the back of what trucks, exactly?
      Charged where, exactly?

      Puerto Rico was broke before the hurricane hit, now Tesla is exploiting their desperation by shipping them âhundredsâ(TM) of expensive battery packs...

      --
      Ken
    27. Re: Maybe use with gens by kenh · · Score: 1

      Have the 10,000 aid workers been pulled from the island?

      No.

      Were the 3,000 containers on the dock awaiting pickup on the dock taken away?

      No.

      Has the mayor of San Juan bothered to attend relief meetings with federal officials?

      No.

      --
      Ken
    28. Re: Maybe use with gens by kenh · · Score: 1

      We should be sending flotillas of ships and boats with supplies (water, food and medical supplies) anywhere along the coast where ships and supply boats can dock, or even using beaches where possible.

      Of course, there are amazingly few places where ships/boats can dock in Puerto Rico post-hurricane - but hey, doesnâ(TM)t it feel good to rail against âthe manâ(TM)...

      --
      Ken
    29. Re:Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the claim of teamsters union going on strike is PARTIALLY TRUE.

      While officially there is no strike, fact is the union leader actually called for the strike multiple times on national television. He was basically demanding free diesel (for life) and full control of the distribution process as well as advanced payment for the "future" work. But the call was NEVER agreed by the union members and in fact it was almost unanimously rejected.

      The issue with the truckers is one of lack of communication and lack of transportation. Since there is no electricity, most truckers are not receiving a call to help and out of the few that are aware of the situation less than half are able to move due to a lack of fuel, can't travel due to damage roads or are dealing with the lost of their home.

    30. Re: Maybe use with gens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is snopes considered more trustworthy ...

      But they're not considered trustworthy by those who object to the facts they publish.

      Other than that it's their good track record at busting myths and scams. E.g., politics aside, it's the very first place you'd go to see if some email a friend received seemed like a scam to you.

    31. Re: Maybe use with gens by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      She couldn't be bothered to attend meetings for her Country's recovery, but somehow managed to get a T-shirt and had printed. If that was reversed (politically), you'd be right to criticize.

      Only hypocrites and politics (probably synonyms) makes it so that "Never" is a good time.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    32. Re:Maybe use with gens by MercTech · · Score: 1

      LOL, if they had the power plant and power distribution lines fixed so they could charge a power wall they wouldn't need the power wall in the first place.

      Nice virtue signalling in the sending of high tech junk when funding a couple of dozen linemen and a cargo container of wire would get the problem actually resolved.

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
    33. Re: Maybe use with gens by rpstrong · · Score: 2

      Because, like a well written Wiki article, they provide specific citations. You are free to double check their sources.

    34. Re:Maybe use with gens by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      until my better judgment tells me not to im always up for musk not for president but for the next bill gates i think besos is doing a lousy job

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  2. Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will these Powerwall units be recharged after they have been used up on the first go around? The electricity infrastructure is going to be down for quite a while, as the power plants and transmission lines have to be replaced. Whilst solar panels sound like a good idea, how will you install PV when the vast majority of buildings are wrecked, and building materiel is going to be prioritised for reconstruction of homes and public structures?

    1. Re:Just wondering by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      and building materiel is going to be prioritised for reconstruction of homes and public structures?

      I'm curious to know how you are certain about what they will be prioritizing? I'd think a battery-backed solar array at a local shelter would be very welcome right now, and may indeed take priority over any individual's house.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the main grid is down, small local grids will pop up all over the place. Having power walls supplement these will be quite valueable.

    3. Re:Just wondering by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      hospital?

    4. Re:Just wondering by Rei · · Score: 1

      Power plants. Seriously.

      1) Day and night loads are very different from each other. Having storage for loadshifting lets you use a smaller amount of generation infrastructure at a higher capacity factor.

      2) Loadshifting also lets you get by on fewer / less capable transmission lines. A good example of this is the old Castle Valley flow battery in Utah, on one of the Rattlesnake lines. By - again - charging at night and discharging during the day, halfway down the line, they help maintain the daytime voltage on the line when it would otherwise be experiencing excessive voltage drop or power quality problems.

      --
      "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
    5. Re:Just wondering by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Hospitals, nursing homes, distribution centers, shelters, schools, etc. Lots of great places to have electricity!

      Though I suppose hospitals probably need more power than these could provide, and probably are getting priority for generators and diesel.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:Just wondering by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Though I suppose hospitals probably need more power than these could provide

      The Powerwalls can be used for load leveling. If a hospital has a 10kw generator and has power needs that fluctuate between 6kw and 12kw, then that is not going to work. But stick in a Powerwall, and it can recharge from the generator when the demand is at 6kw, and supply supplement power to handle the peaks.

    7. Re:Just wondering by nospam007 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "Having power walls supplement these will be quite valueable."

      They beat Trump walls any day.

    8. Re:Just wondering by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      The problem is that Puerto Rico currently does not have any transmission lines, and so load leveling the power plants that aren't connected to anything is not useful.

      Significant percentages of the island are going to be relying on local power generation for months, and you can get a lot more out of a generator and limited amount of fuel when you've got solar panels and battery backs to back them up.

    9. Re:Just wondering by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I would imagine they could provide power to the minimum critical areas for a short time in the event of generator failure or a late fuel shipment.

    10. Re:Just wondering by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      If you actually watched some of the video of PR after the storm, you would have seen solar panels on many roofs.

      At least those who covered them to protect them during the storm.

      That said, it would also be helpful to send them PV solar panels.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    11. Re:Just wondering by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Informative

      How will these Powerwall units be recharged after they have been used up on the first go around?

      From solar panels.

      The electricity infrastructure is going to be down for quite a while, as the power plants and transmission lines have to be replaced.

      Yes, that's exactly why you want the solar panels and battery storage.

      Whilst solar panels sound like a good idea, how will you install PV when the vast majority of buildings are wrecked, and building materiel is going to be prioritised for reconstruction of homes and public structures?

      I would think that setting up solar panels to provide emergency power would have a high priority. Setting up solar panels (or, repairing some of the installations that already exist on the island) is going to be very quick compared to reconstructing a demolished building; devoting a day or so to restoring the power grid is not going to delay the months-to-years long process of rebuilding the island.

      https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/the-solar-industry-wants-to-help-puerto-rico.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    12. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well would you look at that, it's an irrelevant political comment with no value.

    13. Re:Just wondering by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      How will these Powerwall units be recharged after they have been used up on the first go around? The electricity infrastructure is going to be down for quite a while, as the power plants and transmission lines have to be replaced. Whilst solar panels sound like a good idea, how will you install PV when the vast majority of buildings are wrecked, and building materiel is going to be prioritised for reconstruction of homes and public structures?

      Thois is yet another cool thing. Our American Army, perhaps the finest in teh world, has on occasion flown in and constructed entire buildings. What is even more, there are the se portable generators, and like they make a lot of power. Just threow in some diesel fuel, and they can make electricity. Why, the US even builds airstrips and bridges in short order. It's pretty fascinating, they even did this sort of thing in WW2.

      Or do you think we forgot?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    14. Re:Just wondering by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Hospitals, nursing homes, distribution centers, shelters, schools, etc. Lots of great places to have electricity!

      Though I suppose hospitals probably need more power than these could provide, and probably are getting priority for generators and diesel.

      A diesel generator that can power an entire hospital is surprisingly small. I visited a generation site that used a natgas powered turbine to generate electricity and steam heat last year, and they had a diesel backup generator that generated the same amount of power - no steam - and it fit in a building that was maybe 20 by 20 feet. Very small anyhow. Fortunately it was seldom used, as deisel electricity is about as expensive as you can get.

      What I think is weird is these Il Duce II apologists who seem to think that the situation there is something the American Military can't cope with.

      Kryste, we put Japan back together after WW2.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    15. Re:Just wondering by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Well would you look at that, it's an irrelevant political comment with no value.

      But you beat it with a post even less valuable. ACs never fail to lower the bar. Hey, there's something on Fox radio now. Turns out the Gunman in Las Vegas was Hillary!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    16. Re:Just wondering by Rei · · Score: 1

      As written elsewhere: Puerto Rico was heavily damaged; it wasn't mowed to the ground. There still exist power plants and transmission lines (and more coming online - slowly - every day). What matters is stretching what you do have as far as you can.

      --
      "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
    17. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprise surprise it's another irrelevant political comment, with a bonus "you are anonymous therefore less than nothing" insult attempt. It's two cancers for the price of one!

    18. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kryste, we put Japan back together after WW2.

      In a week? Because that's what the mainstream media seems to be demanding.

    19. Re:Just wondering by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Kryste, we put Japan back together after WW2.

      In a week? Because that's what the mainstream media seems to be demanding.

      "Mainstream Media" heheh I think this has something to do with PizzaGate and OBlama's birth certificate as well.

      I mean, the Democrats were fucking children right? There are children in Puerto Rico,. And Hawaii, the fake place where the Kenyan Terror baby, says he was born - This is an island sitting in the middle of an ocean. It's a big ocean. It's a very big ocean. A coincidence? Hell no, this is the smoking gun that blows the dust off of the truth that FDR started World War two. This is it folks, the end times as prophesied buy Supply side Jesus when he handed out loaves and fishes to the crowd at the sermon on the mount - after they's been drug tested of course.

      Your move Dustin.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    20. Re:Just wondering by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Surprise surprise it's another irrelevant political comment, with a bonus "you are anonymous therefore less than nothing" insult attempt. It's two cancers for the price of one!

      If I've insulted you, I have to say that am deeply and truly quite pleased.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    21. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No chance. If they had the means to set up a local grid they would fix the real grid. Plus they don't have any significant generation capacity, even if they had portable generators of sufficient size they don't have the fuel.

    22. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An attempted insult is not a successful insult. The great thing about being anonymous is no one knows which idiot I am, whereas you name makes it obvious which one you are.

    23. Re:Just wondering by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      With 80% of the transmission lines destroyed and the company responsible for rebuilding them essentially bankrupt, there isn't anything there to stretch. The powerwalls will more likely be used for single-structure solar and generator peak shaving. They can't do anything in the short term to help a grid that doesn't exist.

    24. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to be clear .... there is NO COMPANY responsible for rebuilding the transmission lines. The AEE (Electrical Power Authority in Spanish) is owned by the government. The same story with water.

    25. Re:Just wondering by Rei · · Score: 1

      80% destroyed = 20% remaining. Meaning having buffer to loadshift their usage seriously helps that 20%.

      Also, FYI, "80% was destroyed" != "80 is currently destroyed"

      --
      "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
    26. Re:Just wondering by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it's power storage.

      A recouperating CAES setup is far-superior to battery storage: Far less cost--as in city-scale battery storage cost over 300x what the two leading-edge technology CAES stations cost per megawatt hour stored, while the CAES had better power output. Not bad for technology that's not exactly new, but is just barely entering real-world deployment. Thing is you can get a Tesla powerwall battery pack up and running in an hour; you can't get a city-scale CAES installation running in less than a year.

      No, they don't generate electricity; neither does a diesel generator that's run out of fuel. You're going to have trouble keeping the power on, overgenerating and not using, wasting fuel, and the like. You're going to have trouble with the power going out because you're low on fuel. You're going to have trouble with solar and wind not always supplying steady power, even though we can stand either up in a day. The big ass batteries solve that.

      If they rebuild PR's power grid on some large solar-wind installation, maybe we can reclaim the batteries and get them a CAES installation later. Whatever. Point is it works now and gives us a quick way to make unstable power more-stable.

    27. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      80% of transmission lines of a *centralized grid* does not make for 20% remaining, functional lines

    28. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the military could handle it, but the military didn't put Japan together after WWII, it was Douglas MacArthur. Which is why the president needs to go to congress and get a boatload of money to pay for it because PR is bankrupt, due to corrupt local politics. Congress needs to set up something like TVA under the direction of someone appointed by the president. That person probably needs to be a flag officer with experience in logistics. Their job would be to rebuild PR's infrastructure with the goal of eventually turning it over to a public/private partnership not under the control of the local politicians who have put PR in such a bad place before it was hit with a hurricane.
      And congress needs to reinstate tax breaks. PR just doesn't have the economy to survive without them. Unfortunate but true.
      Else expect to see the majority of the hurricane victims coming to the mainland. Hey they've got to survive somehow, if the U.S. can't maintain one of its territories in a livable state then how can we expect citizens to continue to live there?

  3. Not to be overly skeptical by Lucas123 · · Score: 0

    Don't you need to charge batteries? Where exactly are residents without power get the electricity to charge the batteries?

    On the other hand, it is a great marketing scheme. Powerwall batteries + SolarCity roof panels = good business.

    1. Re:Not to be overly skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think you could be bothered to read the article before posting a comment that makes no sense?

    2. Re:Not to be overly skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solar + collecting from the grid during non peak hours and using during peak. Eases the load off the grid.

    3. Re:Not to be overly skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Scheme". ??? You can have energy a hell of a lot quicker with solar than rebuilding the power plant.

    4. Re:Not to be overly skeptical by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

      You did see that I mentioned Telsa (SolarCity) solar panels... yes? I read the article and I doubt there are a lot of solar panels hanging around PR right now. Not really a fast fix to the populations needs, huh?

    5. Re:Not to be overly skeptical by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      It looks like a lot of the grid is down, but the plants are operating. So, they can charge, and then swap.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    6. Re: Not to be overly skeptical by kenh · · Score: 1

      they can charge, and then swap.

      You want them to drive Tesla power walls all around the island, charging them up like so many nicad batteries?

      They will have a third of these powerwalls in transit to and from the functioning generators at any given time.

      BTW, How long does it take to charge a powerwalls?

      --
      Ken
    7. Re:Not to be overly skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla Powerwall ----> OK product (not as great as people think)
      SolarCity roof panels ---> Absolute garbage. A full roof full of them will not produce 2kWh and the average home needs 4 o 6 kWh to break even.
      SpaceX ---> With a REAL 48% rate of failure, people should not call them a success.

  4. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who knows if I could do something similar, were I privileged? But thank you for your bright ideas, and your generosity. May your endeavors be met with success. You saw a gap, and dove right in.

  5. Is he donating them? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    What's not clear from the article is whether he's donating them or whether he expects to be paid for them later. I know they're not cheap but under the circumstances I'd hope he's giving them away for free.

    1. Re: Is he donating them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What if he's lending them, at no cost, but expects them to be returned once the situation stabilizes? Why do you rule that out?

    2. Re:Is he donating them? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Troll

      I know they're not cheap but under the circumstances I'd hope he's giving them away for free.

      I hope he is not. It is better to loan them to cover the crisis, and then take them back so they are available for the NEXT crisis somewhere else.

      The last thing Puerto Rico needs is more permanent handouts. They really need to figure out how to create a sustainable functional economy, and more charity isn't the answer.

    3. Re: Is he donating them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't appreciate your tone, so how about you shove it?

    4. Re:Is he donating them? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Oh I dunno, maybe would be good press and PR for him and his company, and perhaps a great way to help promote the product?

    5. Re:Is he donating them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only problem is, this is PR. I would not expect to be able to get anything back from them.

    6. Re:Is he donating them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded Troll? Because there's no "uncomfortable truth" moderation?

    7. Re:Is he donating them? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Regardless, he's expecting a profit from them later.

      Even if he's donating now, they will need to maintain them if they want to keep them. Who will be contracted for installing the solar panels the batteries need?

      He's only giving them half the solution, it's a great PR stunt but the batteries without panels are worthless and how many panels do you think are left after the storm ripped through?

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  6. Long term implications? by jimmifett · · Score: 1

    Kudos for sending batteries.

    So, how long are they to last before recharge?
    Are they also supplying solar setups to recharge?
    How heavy, can they be easily and safely disconnected and reconnected to home electrical after taking somewhere to charge?
    What is the plan for disposing of these batteries? That's an awful lot of hazardous environmental waste to be disposed of in what... 1 to 5 years? Leeching all into the ground water...

    1. Re:Long term implications? by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      1) They recharge every day, providing day/night load shifting, both for power plants and transmission lines (aka, preventing daytime brownouts when demand exceeds capacity).

      2) Loadshifting benefits every major source of power, not just solar (and, as mentioned, it benefits transmission lines as well)

      3) They're about the size of a breaker box, but 125kg. Any competent electrician can wire one. They're all-in-one systems with the inverter included. You do not "disconnect them to charge", they're not designed to "carry" power around.

      4) They're warrantied for 10 years. And they don't just die when the warranty expires. Nor are they "hazardous environmental waste"; it's lithium ion, not nickel-cadmium or lead-acid. The contents therein, particularly the cobalt in the cathodes, are high demand feedstocks.

      --
      "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
    2. Re:Long term implications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When there's no grid to plug them in to, a rechargable battery doesn't do anyone much good. That being said, if they were distributed *fully charged* to relief centers, and were *solely* used to power refrigeration, then you could stabilize the food supply to at least feed people until the diesel infrastructure is repaired enough to power temporary generators in a couple weeks. Then you use it for load balancing of the site, and extend the restoration out to non-essential services, like lighting and air conditioning once you've got real power generation.

      You might be able to get a couple days out of one of them without offsite power to recharge. In that case, you need a supply chain, send 2 to each site, and send 1 back to be recharged from the mainland while the other is in use. You may be able ladder them to at least get basic power service to people. You won't be charging phones or watching TV, but you could get extremely limited electric service for radio and medical.

    3. Re:Long term implications? by Rei · · Score: 1

      When there's no grid to plug them in to,

      Yes, there is. Puerto Rico was heavily damaged, but every last structure in the country was not leveled to the ground. And there's more coming back online - slowly - every day.

      What is needed is to make the infrastructure that does exist stretch further. This is what batteries do.

      That being said, if they were distributed *fully charged* to relief centers,

      That's just not realistic. The amount of mass just doesn't justify the energy capacity for such a role. The thing you're describing is called a generator.

      --
      "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
    4. Re:Long term implications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fully charged would be of immediate use - it'd make sense to precharge these for emergencies.
      10kW is enough to run a chest freezer for 10 days. It buys time and prevents food spoilage.

    5. Re: Long term implications? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Shipping fully-charged LiON batteries? Isnâ(TM)t that a problem?

      --
      Ken
    6. Re:Long term implications? by chainsaw1 · · Score: 1

      Cobalt is 100% carcinogenic. The depleted uranium rounds used by the military are less toxic than the replacement tungsten-cobalt alloy ones. It's bad enough that it's the reason why Cobalt tipped tools have completely gone away over the last 5 years.

      --
      - Sig
    7. Re:Long term implications? by Rei · · Score: 2

      Cobalt is not "100% carcinogenic". First off, "100% carcinogenic" isn't even a meaningful term. Secondly, cobalt is an essential nutrient in small quantities; the "cobal-" in "cobalamin" (aka, vitamin B12) is cobalt. In higher quantities it's poisonous, although not to the extent of normal "toxic" metals like cadmium and lead; in particular, cobalt is mostly inert when not as a dust or soluble salt. And if it's carcinogenic at all, it's at a level that's so low that it's tough to make out among the effects of other metals. Nor is "toxicity" a reason for avoiding cobalt-alloy drill bits (stainless steel is much worse due to its chromium content). Nor have cobalt-alloy drill bits "gone away"; google them, you can get them all over the bloody place.

      And you're also wrong about tungsten. It is indeed toxic, but not as much as DU.

      --
      "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."
    8. Re:Long term implications? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's bad enough that it's the reason why Cobalt tipped tools have completely gone away over the last 5 years.

      If by completely gone away you mean searching for cobalt in the tools section of Amazon giving just shy of 200,000 products, and every local hardware store across the world stocking basic cobalt tipped cutting tools, then sure, they've "completely gone away".

      I guess the internet, televsision, and the petrol engine have also "completely gone away" by your criteria. It must be a very empty world.

  7. is it still a marketing stunt if it helps people? by pezpunk · · Score: 1

    so, a cynic could say this is just a marketing stunt, sure. but isn't a marketing stunt that may help people better than another car ad on TV?

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
  8. Re:Powerballs... by nwaack · · Score: 2

    ...winning the Powerball is more likely to happen than getting assistance from the Trump Administration.

    Except that, ya know, the Trump administration IS helping Puerto Rico, albeit it slowly at first. I don't like Trump either but you can't just make stuff up. I believe Mr. Trump himself even coined a two-word term for this kind of bullshit.

  9. Re:Powerballs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trump comment

    hilarious and original

  10. Grid? by Train0987 · · Score: 1

    Oh this should do wonders for Puerto Rico's neglected electrical grid and it's capacity.

  11. Germany is helping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Experts from Germany (Sonnen GmbH) are coordinating and doing install on this project:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

    Trump meanwhile did helpfully dedicate a golf trophy in honor of Puerto Rico:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/n...

    In case you didn't know, Puerto Rico is an AMERICAN territory - the people of that territory are American citizens. But our current government for some reason is unwilling/unable to help, and is only much later getting assistance from those who ARE willing/able to help.

    Not that I'm just blaming conservatives here - Bill Clinton was the one that signed the bill that removed the tax benefits that attracted a large percent of business to Puerto Rico, leaving their economy 70 billion dollars in debt once it was phased out.

    But it DOES take a 'modern conservative' approach to be so completely uncaring/unable to help in this kind of recovery after a disaster.

    1. Re:Germany is helping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is the American government not doing in your mind and what measure are you using for what they should be doing ?

    2. Re: Germany is helping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They (R congress) not allowing Puerto Rico to declare bankruptcy years ago (states rights, hah) to protect fat cat bond holders for one. The high interest rate was justified with a risk of bankruptcy. Preventing bankruptcy means the interest rate was unjust.

      But for short term, tweeting more about it than football would have helped. Directing the guard to establish beach heads across the island would have sped relief. The army corps of engineers could have been mobilized in force to clear the main roads immediately.

      There is no federal leader in America today, and Anerica suffers for it.

    3. Re:Germany is helping... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The legal-technical reasons are a lot more convoluted. They're naturalized citizens and it's not a state. Those are big differences, naturalized citizens can't get security clearances, they can often not get federal student loans or federal jobs.

      Puerto Rico is for all intents and purposes a colony of the US. It's supposed to produce goods/gold/gems but there are no provisions to help them with an invasion, local issues or a disaster.

      On the other hand, Puerto Rico has also had a string of bad leadership, paying out bonds before infrastructure and that sorts was not just a thing the president or congress decided, but their own governors agreed to and played along.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:Germany is helping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just not true that the U.S. government is not sending help. Naval forces were sent almost immediately. They provided air support, immediate medical attention and most important work getting harbor infrastructure ready for follow on ships. The president suspended the Jones act, which would have prevented foreign national registered ships from being used to carry relief supplies. The USS Comfort was sent. The Comfort is a floating hospital. That took a week because it is staffed primarily by reservists and draws too much water to have docked in PR before the harbor infrastructure was cleaned up.
      That being said I know people in PR and they've told me that not enough drinking water is getting through for the people that need it in San Juan. The cell towers are working on some of the island, because a friend has been able to talk to her fiancee on his cell phone, which he has had to conserve the charge on because even though the cells in his area are working (they have their own backup generators) general power is not available.
      My friend also says that she figures a lot of people are going to eventually end up on the mainland, because they will be unable to rebuild based on PR's failing economy and out and out civil corruption. She figures professionals and people who own property will stick it out and eventually recover, but that most others will leave if they can.

  12. "Miss, and you lose it all!" by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    "Miss, and you lose it all!"

  13. Puerto Rico Electric Utility by oldgraybeard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't it true that the Electric Utility in Puerto Rico is Owned and Operated by the government?

    Is that maybe why, The Electric Utility is having money problems, The Electric Grid was sub par, The disaster Planning was sub par and the fact that the Electric Utility is so totally unprepared to restore the Electric Grid?

    My point being, it is to late now to do anything now. So lets not relive the past. But, maybe the Electric Utility should be privatized. There isn't much left and this mightl expedite the rebuilding process. And hopefully put the Electric Utility on firmer footing. That could be more prepared for the future storms to come.

    So come on Tesla, Somebody? step up make the future better ;)

    1. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      The power utility was $9 billion dollars in debt before this crisis even happened. They weren't able to maintain the network they already had, rebuilding it from scratch is even harder when you don't have any money to do it with.

    2. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if the electric utility was govt owned, but both the local govt and electric utility are bankrupt. That is why their grid was in the state of disrepair that it was prior to the outage. I suspect that due to the state the power grid was in prior, there probably is a lot of local generation already on the ground. The problem is probably people obtaining the fuel to keep their whole house generators running.

    3. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by oldgraybeard · · Score: 2

      Additional Information

      From article dated: JULY 2, 2017
      Puerto Ricos Power Authority Effectively Files for Bankruptcy

      And then there is this.
      "Electricity is given free of charge to every one of the commonwealth's 78 municipalities, to many of its government enterprises and even to some private businesses located in buildings owned by municipalities. PREPA has $1 billion or more in accounts receivable, much of which is owed by other units of the Puerto Rico government."
      Renewable electricity as a solution to Puerto Rico debt crisis? You must be kidding

      And some wonder why the Electric Grid is getting repaired?

    4. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

      Correction
      And some wonder why the Electric Grid is "NOT" getting repaired?

      And yes the $9 Billion dollar debt good point!! Guspaz!!

    5. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by barc0001 · · Score: 2

      > But, maybe the Electric Utility should be privatized

      Ah, privatization. The solution to that pesky problem of too much money in citizens' hands. Reading your entire post I am still not sure if you are serious or if that's some next level sarcasm. As someone who lives in an area (British Columbia) and lived through 3 Crown corporations being privatized, I will attest first hand that you don't get any better service, but you certainly do get higher bills.

    6. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While I am usually a free-market proponent, you would have had the same result from a direct hit of a hurricane. Any above-ground electric would be subject to being decimated by high winds. Unfortunately, underground wiring has a much higher cost than above-ground wiring (air flow naturally cools the wires, which allows higher power flow over the same material cost), and it turns into a risk-reward number crunching exercise. I hate to say, but only regulated electric run by government is capable of over-designing, over-spending, and over-building for a once-in-a-lifetime event. Capitalists would look at the risk profile and say the costs don't justify the expense. The costs are just too large to be passed on to PR citizens without some federal bailout.

    7. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

      I put privatization out there as an option. But your point is very valid!!! And a good point!

    8. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

      Also, privatization does not always mean a for profit company. My current electric provider is an association.

      Dakota Electric Association is a member-owned, not-for-profit electric utility founded by local farmers in 1937 with the help of the Rural Electrification Administration.

    9. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can almost hear the laughter from a Duke energy shareholder meeting from here:

      "Mr CEO, I recommend we spend $10B completely rebuilding Puerto Rico's electric infrastructure from the ground up and maintain it for free for the next 5-20 years until they get back on their feet"

    10. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      To be pedantic, your electric provider is not an example of privatization. It was created as a private entity. An example of privatization would be, say, selling BC Rail - a government owned rail service with thousands of kilometers of track in BC to CN rail, Canada's largest railroad company. Sure the handover was messy and a few people involved with the deal on the government side went to jail for corruption, but the important thing to come out of all of it was that CN acquired BC Rail for about 50 cents on the dollar, got a 990 year lease (no, that is not a typo) on the land all of the tracks occupy, and now feels that it is appropriate to block access to the beach across a 15 foot section of its track that has been used as a public throughway for decades unless the city of West Vancouver pays it millions of dollars per year in rent for the access.

      http://www.nsnews.com/news/federal-tribunal-to-hear-west-van-seawalk-dispute-1.22320184

    11. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And privatisation of the electric grid has worked so well in Australia (sic). Since the electric grid in most Australian states was privatised, power prices went through the roof, quality of supply has gone down, and investment in new infrastructure is happening at a glacial pace.

      Privatisation is not always the answer, and can lead to a much worse outcome as the private enterprises chase profit at the expense of consumers.

    12. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But, maybe the Electric Utility should be privatized

      Ah, privatization. The solution to that pesky problem of too much money in citizens' hands. Reading your entire post I am still not sure if you are serious or if that's some next level sarcasm. As someone who lives in an area (British Columbia) and lived through 3 Crown corporations being privatized, I will attest first hand that you don't get any better service, but you certainly do get higher bills.

      I'm not sure I buy that there is a definitive causal link between privatization being better than a government solution, particularly in the case of sole source or monopoly contracts. Competition isn't going to optimize anything, if there isn't any. Even if privatization was chosen, you still need the public officials that organize it to be competent, so they choose a private company that will deliver good service and value. Of course if the government and such had lots of competent leadership, then perhaps they would be in a different state now. I haven't studied Puerto Rico though, so I don't know what their resources are. Being an island must up the costs for most things.

      Our government should run the numbers and see if a distributed solar/other design for the repairs makes sense long term. The best time to do a large change is when things are in the worst shape. Certainly key infrastructure could be moved to something like that. Key infrastructure must be either redundant or somewhat hardened, and when your in the middle of the ocean Solar and such probably makes more sense.

      As far as the powerwall goes, as has been mentioned, linking them to generators or other distributed power sources, first in high priority areas, then other areas is the obvious use. A generator that can run flat out with a supplemental battery can run a lot more, particularly if your talking about motor loads or other irregular loads. Starting current for say a refrigerator compressor is, after all, a lot higher than running current. This is even more so for large air conditioners and such.

      Another thing I'd recommend is to setup buildings with basically a bunch of outlets for phone charging. People can bring their own adapter or borrow one. One single generator can charge a lot of phones. (The could also bring in battery radios that don't go dead so quickly.) Some kind of mesh wifi network could also be established, possibly at those same buildings. Laser point to point might do the backhaul, but 802.11 also works, with the right equipment. (The purpose of the improvised network is _NOT_ to provide the internet, but to do basic information, and perhaps provide a portal you can sign up on to send text messages.)

    13. Re:Puerto Rico Electric Utility by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      One of the major reasons they went bankrupt was the high cost of fuel. Fuel was the majority of their expenditure. So switching to fuel-free renewables sounds like a good idea.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  14. Re:Powerballs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    creimer,

    If you aren't happy about it. Complain to US management. Bitching about it in the comments is useless.

    I hear they might have a chair for you on the management board:

    http://www.keynamics.com/image...

    Is that "enterprise-level" enough for you?

  15. Re:Powerballs... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "Except that, ya know, the Trump administration IS helping Puerto Rico, albeit it slowly at first. I don't like Trump either but you can't just make stuff up. I believe Mr. Trump himself even coined a two-word term for this kind of bullshit."

    Donald, go away.

  16. Re:is it still a marketing stunt if it helps peopl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Funny you should bring in advertising. This is publicity money can't buy, and this is *exactly* why they're doing it.

  17. Re:Powerballs... by nwaack · · Score: 1

    Donald, go away.

    LOL! Come on now. If I were Donald Trump my response would've been, "President Trump is helping Puerto Rico, and it's the biggest most greatest help ever given!!! Crooked Hilary wouldn't have helped as bigly as this!! Make Puerto Rico great again!"

  18. Please IP ban creimer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am so happy to see that now your newest alts are getting karma blasted within minutes.
    It would make me extremely happy to see the site's real moderators do their job and totally IP ban creimer.

    If a normal poster with excellent karma built up 2 alts they could completely shortcircuit the moderation system. They could post as Anonymous Coward and effectively get the same starting score as our best posters.

    A normal person with some urge to troll would assume the flaw in this plan is eventually being assigned a complete IP ban from a living breathing human but creimer demonstrates this is not true. Each day that he allowed to continue posting on slashdot is more affirmation that there are no consequences for exploiting flaws in our self moderation model. As a matter of fact it appears that site administration was compassionate enough to try to help him dodge the trolls... which he fucked up within a day.

    Sure they watched it unfold and can see he's just a shitty poster. He even spams amazon ad-links from his alts, since he's stopped doing it on his main I assume that the ad-spam was a condition of his continued presence on this site.

    Just pitch him in the trash plz.

  19. Everything's relative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Solar panels are relatively light and cheap...

    ...when compared to diesel locomotives and concrete mixers, yes they are. Compared to feathers or kittens, not so much.

    I sure wouldn't want to try to carry a useful stack of panels through a hurricane-devastated landscape on foot.

    1. Re:Everything's relative. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Solar panels are relatively light and cheap...

      ...when compared to diesel locomotives and concrete mixers, yes they are. Compared to feathers or kittens, not so much.

      I sure wouldn't want to try to carry a useful stack of panels through a hurricane-devastated landscape on foot.

      There are these things called helicopters? I've seen videos of them dropping off and picking up soldiers, boxes of stuff and even trucks.

      Who knew?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Everything's relative. by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      these things called helicopters

      fake news.

    3. Re:Everything's relative. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      these things called helicopters

      fake news.

      Sikorsky was Russian, wasn't he? A coincidence? I think not!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Everything's relative. by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Mind blown.

    5. Re:Everything's relative. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Mind blown.

      I have a newsletter, the ideas of which you might find intriguing.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  20. There's nothing new about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Private enterprise must be better at allocating resources than a government agency.

    When a private enterprise allocates resources poorly, it is punished with bankruptcy; when a government agency allocates resources poorly, it is rewarded with more tax monies.

  21. Re:is it still a marketing stunt if it helps peopl by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    Funny you should bring in advertising. This is publicity money can't buy, and this is *exactly* why they're doing it.

    And it's a brilliant move, too, since it gives them a chance to demonstrate to the world the utility of their product and how it solves a problem (lightning-fast rollout of 24/7 power) that "traditional" power grids cannot.

    It's one thing for a company to say "give us money and we promise we can do this for you", and a much more powerful thing when the company can say "look what we did for Puerto Rico on a small budget and miniscule timeline".

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  22. Re:Maybe Puerto Ricans will start caring... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    ... about how they construct their society. Beggars can't blown away by the hurricane, and nobody cares.

    You are seriously fucking evil, troll or no. I just converted to Christianity so I know that you will burn in Hell.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  23. When I was in the Florida Keys by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    a few years ago, I was quite impressed with how all the utility poles were made out of reinforced concrete and were up high enough for trees to not be an issue. I have now learned that this is a big fat lesson learned from Hurricane Andrew in particular.

    I've never been to Puerto Rico, but from I understand, their utility poles were not built to such standards because to date, they'd been lucky.

    Up here in Massachusetts, we don't get much in the way of hurricanes, so most of our utility poles, including the high tension lines, are made out of rotting wood pilings. If it rots too much, it gets "fixed" with 2x4s and some 1/4-20 threaded rods.

    There's a lesson in here somewhere, but if Puerto Rico has its act together, they'll probably want to rebuild a little tougher, maybe with distributed storage, maybe with more robust power distribution. I'm a Tesla skeptic, but I'm cheering them on here, since it looks like they have an incentive to demonstrate something working.

    1. Re:When I was in the Florida Keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany just buries everything. It's beautiful. Power NEVER goes down.

    2. Re:When I was in the Florida Keys by swb · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a wooden utility pole that wasn't treated against rot. Pine logs wouldn't last 2 years without being treated. I've only seen one pole replaced in my neighborhood in the 18 years I've lived here, so the rest may be going on 20-30 years.

    3. Re:When I was in the Florida Keys by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Germany rarely gets swamped with salt water.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:When I was in the Florida Keys by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      I just spent 8 days without power in the wonderful land of Florida. The winds that took down my lines were in the 50 mph range. Our infrastructure sucks. Florida almost never gets bad weather and is spoiled by the fact. These folks should experience living someplace that gets several ice storms every year or hail storms punching out half of the roofs almost every May.

      On the other hand, I lived in Kansas for a couple of years once. We almost never went without power despite 25-30 mph winds being almost normal and 50-60 mph winds happening many times a year during storms. The lines where I lived were nearly 100% underground. Florida and Puerto Rico could both learn a lesson by that.

      Interestingly, it wasn't the choice of the utility companies in Kansas to design well. It was regulated by the government. It is time for the national government to regulate that utilities and construction in all areas of the country be appropriate to survive the natural conditions normal to those areas. The only way the disasters and the following bailouts will stop is when the need stops.

    5. Re:When I was in the Florida Keys by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      Florida and Puerto Rico can't bury most of their lines -- salt water flooding. Kansas is well above sea level.

    6. Re:When I was in the Florida Keys by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      I'm in central Florida. My immediate neighborhood has buried lines placed by the developer instead of the power company. The lines feeding the neighborhood were the problem. And no, they aren't above ground because they are higher voltage. They dive underground at the edge of the neighborhood and don't reach the first step-down for the neighborhood for several hundred more feet. It's a pure cost equation. The power companies don't suffer the cost of the lost wages and business.

    7. Re:When I was in the Florida Keys by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm exaggerating, or maybe your neighborhood was built better, but I've lived and worked in the Boston area for ten years and just about every town has poles that look near the end of their useful life, some of which are patched up with 2x4s.

    8. Re:When I was in the Florida Keys by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Alternatively you could put your power lines along with your phone lines under the fricking ground and waterproof all the joints if you live in a hurricane zone. Cheaper than rebuilding every time a hurricane blows through.

      Even if you use steel or concrete utility poles there is still a risk of the lines being damaged by debris.

      Oh and you could also stop building your houses out of matchsticks. They teach this at nursery level in "The Three Little Pigs" for crying out load. There are codes/standards for hurricane proof housing and it's not rocket science either.

      Personally I have little to no sympathy with people affected by the hurricanes. They choose to ignore the risk of the location they live in and then ask others for help because they where to stupid to plan for an inevitable outcome. Why exactly should I care?

    9. Re:When I was in the Florida Keys by swb · · Score: 1

      I don't know, the oldest just look like creosote soaked pine trunks stripped of their limbs. The newer ones have the green tinge of more modern wood treatment.

      The one weird thing I have noticed in the past couple of years is that somebody (I assume the electric utility, who owns the poles) has sunk ~5/8" torx-head fasteners into all the poles near their bases.

      I can't figure out what this is for. My initial thought is that it would risk splitting the pole, and at the base that could be a problem. They seem to be sunk diagonally, so maybe they're meant to prevent splitting problems near the base. Maybe they're just probes, if they sink "right" the pole is OK, and if they go in too easy or don't grip they know the pole is bad?

      Generally speaking, you would think that long-term all the replacements would be some kind of concrete composite. They could be made in a factory and would effectively be permanent, although maybe the life on treated pine trunks is effectively so long that there's no reason to make them last longer if it costs slightly more.

  24. Er... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    "...could be paired with solar panels..."
    So the don't actually have solar panels for them, then?
    In which case the question would be, what real value shipping chargeable batteries to a place with no electricity?

    Wouldn't any generation capacity already be at use in critical functions, ie no spare time to run to charge these things?

    --
    -Styopa
  25. Re:Powerballs... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I believe Mr. Trump himself even coined a two-word term for this kind of bullshit.

    Cov...fefe?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. Anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...here's Powerwall

  27. Musk isn't privileged; he's proven; he's able. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Elon Musk has proven that he can allocate resources in ways that are fruitful for everyone; thus, disregarding a few governmental handouts here and there, people have voluntarily handed over their resources to Musk (e.g., by purchasing his products), and they have done so to such a degree that Musk has built the ability to quickly make large-scale allocations of capital like this.

    It's not a privilege; it's an ability, one that has been built up through the careful proof to society that he's worthy of wielding said ability. This is very different from, say, elected officials, who do indeed enjoy privileges (ones that are likely unwarranted).

  28. Why not fly the beaners out on rockets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then he could hire them for $5/day to work on building hyperloop track, polishing Tesla tires, or opening the sacks of government grant checks.

  29. Re:Powerballs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creimer,

    I am sure you read:
    "Tesla shipping hundreds of Powerbars to Puerto Rico" and started salivating.

  30. Double Dipping - the Rich Man's game by merky1 · · Score: 1

    So, he gets to take a huge write off on his taxes for the donation, and then his sole sourced installers get money for the installation of not only the batteries, but also any solar to supply them.

    All while quietly locking everyone else out of the market. In the name of "humanitarian" needs.

    --
    --WooooHoooo--
  31. Re: Powerballs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL best Creimer post this thread.

  32. Which weighs more, a megawatt of feathers, or... by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    Solar panels are relatively light and cheap...

    ...when compared to diesel locomotives and concrete mixers, yes they are. Compared to feathers or kittens, not so much.

    Neither feathers nor kittens would have been my first choice for generating electrical power to charge batteries. My guess is that the weight of feathers and/or kittens needed to provide a megawatt of electrical power would probably be more than the same power generated by solar arrays, but I'd be very interested in hearing the results of your experiment showing the contrary.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  33. Re:Which weighs more, a megawatt of feathers, or.. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Neither feathers nor kittens would have been my first choice for generating electrical power to charge batteries. My guess is that the weight of feathers and/or kittens needed to provide a megawatt of electrical power would probably be more than the same power generated by solar arrays, but I'd be very interested in hearing the results of your experiment showing the contrary.

    Seems you cut out all of my part of the post , but here we are. So I'll drop some comments that aren't specifically related to you.

    Anyhow, the US military is very capable of setting up mini-cities as need be. They can even do so-called alternative powering schemes. Like Solar https://us.sunpower.com/blog/2... wind - http://www.decentralized-energ... .

    They aren't going to set up a big system like the examples shown for PR, but that's where Tesla's PowerWalls really fit the bill. And they can be charged by equally deliverable PV panels.

    The remarks by some Slashdotters have been concerning, especially for a site frequented by people presumably tech-savvy. A company does something humanitarian, and Slashdotters don't seem to think the military can deliver it, that it won't work once its there because they can't deliver solar cells, which is kinda weird because they have to believe that something can't be delivered and can be at the same time.

    More concerning to me is that our presumed smart people seem to think alternative energy is still in the early 1960's. Too expensive, batteries too little storage capacity, wind power just a toy. All things that have long since been untrue.

    Hell, in my area, we have installed enough wind power that they can feather back during off-peak times. It's freaky to see a site starting up and stopping as needed. In fact, wind has made the transition to mainstream energy as far as most around here ae concerned.

    Puerto Rico will make good use of these PowerWalls, and Tesla will reap a lot of goodwill and publicity - but Jesus on a pogo stick, it takes a mind like a bag full of warts to hate a humanitarian effort like that.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  34. Re:Which weighs more, a megawatt of feathers, or.. by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    I don't know. You could probably generate a lot of power with a bunch of kittens on a treadmill and a laser pointer.

  35. Re:Which weighs more, a megawatt of feathers, or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My gut tells me that...Elon Musk is doing a good thing, for the sake of doing a good thing. Yes, he does the PT Barnum from time to time, selling promises with great flair, kinda has to...but these PowerWall deliveries are still a good thing, at a very basic human level.

  36. Re:Which weighs more, a megawatt of feathers, or.. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    My gut tells me that...Elon Musk is doing a good thing, for the sake of doing a good thing. Yes, he does the PT Barnum from time to time, selling promises with great flair, kinda has to...but these PowerWall deliveries are still a good thing, at a very basic human level.

    From what I understand, Musk doesn't identify with people on the individual level very much, but more on humanity as a large group. But I'll buy the good thing idea. It fits with his personality.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  37. Re:Which weighs more, a megawatt of feathers, or.. by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    Seems you cut out all of my part of the post , but here we are. So I'll drop some comments that aren't specifically related to you.

    Oops, sorry-- My response had been addressed to the previous post (the one saying solar panels were not light compared to kittens or feathers); I mis-threaded it.

    Good comments, if I had mod points I'd mod you up.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  38. Re:Which weighs more, a megawatt of feathers, or.. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Seems you cut out all of my part of the post , but here we are. So I'll drop some comments that aren't specifically related to you.

    Oops, sorry-- My response had been addressed to the previous post (the one saying solar panels were not light compared to kittens or feathers); I mis-threaded it.

    Good comments, if I had mod points I'd mod you up.

    No problem. It gave me the chance to skewer the strange new inhabitants of Slashdot. 8^)

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  39. Submarine Power by msc.buff · · Score: 1

    Just send one of our nuclear subs to provide a source of main power...or maybe a carrier. A carrier would be better of course but they may be too busy threatening countries thousands of miles away from the US.

    A nuclear ship could even be a long term solution for PR. It could provide power for the island while they get solar/wind established and rebuild their infrastructure. If bad weather rolls in the ship unplugs and finds clear water until the storm has passed...;)

  40. Who to trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're more trustworthy than anonymous cowards, that's for sure.

    When an AC posts the AC can't rely on reputation. To get the post taken seriously the AC can only rely on readily verifiable or well-known facts and a reasonably understandable chain of reasoning, otherwise they must expect their post to be ignored.

    When a name says "Trust me. I'm a doctor or president or news organisation or whatever.", you've got to ask yourself why the name can't, or doesn't want to, make their statement the same way the AC has to. Why do you have to trust them?

    The only thing I'm going to ask you to trust me on is that I don't speak for all anonymous cowards.

    1. Re:Who to trust by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      They're more trustworthy than anonymous cowards, that's for sure.

      When an AC posts the AC can't rely on reputation. To get the post taken seriously the AC can only rely on readily verifiable or well-known facts and a reasonably understandable chain of reasoning, otherwise they must expect their post to be ignored.

      Really? If so, the anonymous cowards do a notoriously lousy job of doing so. Posts by anonymous cowards are almost always lacking in verifiable information, well-known facts, and understandable chains of reasoning, but are good with insults, stereotypes, and fact-free assertions usually grounded in one political ideology or another.

      As far as I can tell, the people who post as anonymous cowards do so because they are posting garbage that they don't want associated with their names.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  41. Re:Which weighs more, a megawatt of feathers, or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was think more of rubbing the kittens across a rubber sheet to produce static electricity.