Nobel Prize For Medicine Awarded For Insights Into Internal Biological Clock
Dave Knott quotes a report from The Guardian: The Nobel prize in physiology or medicine has been awarded to a trio of American scientists for their discoveries on the molecular mechanisms controlling circadian rhythms -- in other words, the 24-hour body clock. According to the Nobel committee's citation, the researchers were recognized for their discoveries explaining "how plants, animals and humans adapt their biological rhythm so that it is synchronized with the Earth's revolutions." The team identified a gene within fruit flies that controls the creatures' daily rhythm, known as the "period" gene. This gene encodes a protein within the cell during the night which then degrades during the day. When there is a mismatch between this internal "clock" and the external surroundings, it can affect the organism's wellbeing -- for example, in humans, when we experience jet lag. All three winners are from the U.S. Jeffrey C Hall, 72, has retired but spent the majority of his career at Brandeis University in Waltham, Massachusetts, where fellow laureate Michael Rosbash, 73, is still a faculty member. Michael W Young, 68, works at Rockefeller University in New York.
Hall and Rosbash then went on to unpick how the body clock actually works, revealing that the levels of protein encoded by the period gene rise and fall throughout the day in a negative feedback loop. Young, meanwhile, discovered a second gene involved in the system, dubbed "timeless," that was critical to this process. Only when the proteins produced from the period gene combined with those from the timeless gene could they enter the cell's nucleus and halt further activity of the period gene. Young also discovered the gene that controlled the frequency of this cycle.
Hall and Rosbash then went on to unpick how the body clock actually works, revealing that the levels of protein encoded by the period gene rise and fall throughout the day in a negative feedback loop. Young, meanwhile, discovered a second gene involved in the system, dubbed "timeless," that was critical to this process. Only when the proteins produced from the period gene combined with those from the timeless gene could they enter the cell's nucleus and halt further activity of the period gene. Young also discovered the gene that controlled the frequency of this cycle.
Haha! You have period genes.
My clock is definitively not set for 24 hours, and I don't mean off by a little. If I try to follow a rhythm of staying up until I'm tired and sleep until I wake by myself without caring about the outside world I'm closer to a 36 hour cycle, awake for 24 and sleep for 12. Obviously that's impractical so with a combination of alarms and feeling undernourished on sleep I mostly manage to keep regular hours, but if I turn off the alarm I not only oversleep for hours but the following night I got no chance to fall asleep at all. If they start to understand the working of the internal clock, maybe they can fix it on a more fundamental level than sleeping aids.
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
ask yourself: if it takes "scientists" to do your job, why can we outsource it to low-wage workers in the other side of the world with no loss whatsoever?
My language doesn't attach the word "science" to computer degrees, so we're ahead of you on that one (well, except for Bachelor and Master degrees, but those are international names so don't blame us).
As for the quoted statement, in my experience we can't. Any company I've been in that has outsourced, and every friend who has been in the know in his or her company, tells the same story: outsourcing looks great on paper, but is a pile of stinking poo in reality. Money saved on wages for developers, gets lost in the poor quality of the delivered product, and the extra resources needed to manage them.
The only remedy I've seen is to not rent resources but instead establish a local office, then send people there a lot in order to bring that culture more in line with our own. It takes a long time, and costs a lot of money, but eventually they might become productive. I can only think of one example of it working, and it took about a decade to get there.
I am much more interested in the IgNobel prizes than in the Nobel prizes, especially since Dunning and Kruger were awarded the IgNobel prize for their work.
I was so grateful that somebody finally did some research into a phenomenon I am encountering every day.
So I know this probably wasn't the prime motivation for their research but if it could please lead to a cure for jet-lag I would hope they would be showered with huge monetary awards as well! As I've gotten older, jet-lag has made long-distance flying a source of real debilitation. I know this is (mostly) a first-world problem but there are plenty of pilots/military/leaders for whom being able to arrive reasonably alert (or at least not literally feeling sick) would be quite valuable for them and for those that they serve.
It isn't unheard of for a Nobel prize in medicine to lead, relatively quickly, to a treatment or a new drug. I think the scientists who discovered vasoconstriction inhibitors(?) found that it could be used therapeutically and it was commercialized rapidly. I'm talking about Viagra of course and I just happen to know about this because I'm, uh... interested!
Actually, jet-lag happens to be worst in trans-Atlantic trips, where the time zone difference is about 5 hours and the flight time is about 7 hours. I once took a trip from the East Coast to Taiwan, 11 hours difference, 20 hours flight time.
Before the trip I was told that I will have no jet-lag and it turned out to be true. I was to exhausted after the trip and my internal clock was so messed up that I had a long sleep when I arrived at the destination and when I woke up I was fully adjusted to the new time zone.
Nice to see they are being recognized for their important work!
Daylight Savings Time is causing health issues and should be abolished!
http://www.businessinsider.com...
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
[Please] stop using terms like "computer science", it's low-grade engineering at best.
You have a point. Software is a combination of logic, planning, design, analysis, creativity, try-it-and-see, composition, original ideas, etc. -- and all to varying degrees. Perhaps there should be a new word for that. New things often borrow old forms, but at some point it's nice to have a proper name.
Anyone who knows their Latin or Greek or Sanskrit, are there any good words upoin which we could base the notion of a "code creator" ?
Description:
Body clock is unstable and the daily cycle extends as long as 36 hours unless reset. A proper quartz clock should be implemented.
Status:
REJECTED
Comment:
A more accurate body clock is not system critical. The timekeeping will be regularly reset by day/night cycle. If you stay away from light for a sufficiently long time for this problem to manifest, you are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
As much as it pains me to say this, as a programmer myself, I have to agree. Most all of us are shitty people, and the vast majority of us are in this job not because we wanted to be, but because we landed in the quicksand when someone else pulled themselves out and we ended up being good, or good enough, at it to stay stuck.
If I could make the money I make doing development work doing ANYTHING else, I would. Fuck the digital janitor routine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ct1hkROmxc
Legislator ;)
Those are researchers in REAL science, not nerdy autistic computer shit. Stop using terms like "computer science", it's low-grade engineering at best. All you butthurt geeks who will downvote this comment because they're hurt by the truth, ask yourself: if it takes "scientists" to do your job, why can we outsource it to low-wage workers in the other side of the world with no loss whatsoever?
Computer Science != Coders, period. Sadly, many people are uneducated and still think that those 2 are the same. Probably, it is because those who graduated with computer science major can work in coding.
Yes, there are losses, especially in quality. The truth is that you know nothing but conflate everything using your little falsify knowledge. Maybe you are one of those AHole CxO.