UK Government Could Imprison People For Looking At Terrorist Content (betanews.com)

Mark Wilson writes: Not content with trying to "combat" encryption, the UK government also wants to criminalize looking at terrorist content. The leading Conservative party has announced plans which threaten those who "repeatedly view terrorist content online" with time behind bars. New laws will be introduced that could see consumers of terrorist content imprisoned for up to 15 years. The same maximum sentence would face those who share information about police, soldiers or intelligence agencies with a view to organizing terrorist attacks.

Comments

Stupid.

[Baron_Yam]

Assuming the summary is a correct and concise one.

You can't learn about terrorism without reading about it. Not reading about it leaves you ignorant. Being ignorant removes the tools for combating it.

This is just a dumb, knee-jerk reaction idea from the start.

Re:Stupid.

[sims 2]

Wouldn't this make anyone who regularly watches the news a criminal?

Re: Stupid.

[bsolar]

So, you're saying they don't want people reading terrorist websites because then people might find out that the terrorists are actually good guys?

What people might find out is not that terrorists are good guys, but that bad guys once in a while might have a point too. Furthermore they might realise the actual good guys might not have always been worthy of praise...

Basically, they are afraid people might realise the gross oversimplifications your comment exemplifies are not a good way to reason about issues.

Re:Stupid.

[Ian A. Shill]

Wouldn't this make anyone who regularly watches the news a criminal?

Not if they make it illegal to report on terrorism

But, it's always been illegal to report on terrorism.

Even China doesn't typically arrest for reading

[evolutionary]

To the best my knowledge, you can be arrested for POSTING content critical of the government (or considered not in "public interests", but as far as I know, you aren't imprisoned for simply reading it (China as so many censor mechanisms in place it probably doesn't matter so much). Does this party even realize what precedent they are setting in proposing this?

Remember remember the 5th of November

[aicrules]

Come on guys...have you not seen V for Vendetta?

Extension of an existing law

[Neil_Brown]

This is the extension of an existing law for âoecollecting or making a record of information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorismâ, or possessing such information.

Apparently, as it stands, it does not cover streaming, so will be extended to reference it. The proposal would also change the penalty from a maximum of 10 years in prison to a maximum of 15 years.

Re:This is why the 2nd Amendment won't go away.

[Anonymous Coward]

Your 2nd may not go away because of the gun nuts, but your 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and who knows what else are down the shitter.

So, congratulations, you have the right to shoot into a crowd, but nobody is doing a fucking thing to protect the rest of your rights.

Like it or not, America is trending to fascism just as fast as the Brits .. they just don't go around pretending to be a free society and acting smug about it.

Re:Wow!!!!

[sabri]

Once it's illegal to view any material the government deems dangerous, you can tell them anyone is your ally.

Exactly this. The U.K. has been working on becoming a full police state for many years now. And every time I point this out I get downmodded here on /.

But guess what, the joke's on you, silly Brits. You get what you vote for.

The U.S. voted for a clown and got a clown. The U.K. voted for a police state, and got a police state.