Slashdot Mirror


Google Pixel Buds Are Wireless Earbuds That Translate Conversations In Real Time (arstechnica.com)

At its hardware event today, Google debuted new wireless earbuds, dubbed "Pixel Buds." These are Google's first wireless earbuds that give users access to Google Translate so they can have conversations with people who speak a different language. Ars Technica reports: Unlike Apple's AirPods, the Pixel Buds have a wire connecting the two earpieces. However, that wire doesn't connect to a smartphone or other device. Pixel Buds will pair via Bluetooth to the new Pixel smartphones -- and presumably any other devices that accept Bluetooth wireless earbuds. All of the Pixel Buds' controls are built in to the right earpiece, which is a common hardware solution on wireless earbuds. You can access Google Assistant by tapping or pressing on the right earbud, and the Assistant will be able to read notifications and messages to you through the Buds.

But the most intriguing feature of the Pixel Buds is the integrated Google Translate feature. Demoed on stage at Google's event today, this feature lets two Pixel Bud wearers chat in their native languages by translating conversations in real time. In the demo, a native English speaker and a native Swedish speaker had a conversation with each other, both using their native languages. Google Translate translated the languages for each user. There was barely any lag time in between the speaker saying a phrase and the Buds' hearing those words and translating them into the appropriate language. The Pixel Buds will use Google Translate to comprehend conversations in 40 different languages.
Some other features include a 5-hour battery life, and a charging case that can hold up to 24 hours of battery life. They're available for preorder today for $159.

31 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. local processing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We all know that processing is not done on the phone.

    Which means the real headline should read "Google earbuds will send every word back to the mothership for processing."

    1. Re:local processing by ezelkow1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And it says right there on the page
      "THIS IS A RESEARCH SYSTEM. This is also an early release of a research system. We know the APIs and function names are likely to change, and that several tools need to be made available to make this all complete. "

      It also has not been updated in 3 months, so its not extremely active either. Its not surprising its from CMU though, their flite library is widely used for speech synthesis all over the place for text to speech.

      Either way, the actual parsing being done on mobile devices is minimal at this point. Apple does not do it, and google does it only in specific circumstances with very basic things like 'play music', 'open gmail', etc. There is no in depth parsing to actually figure out context and meaning without the online component as of yet

    2. Re:local processing by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For the iPhone and iPad Apple still sends the data over to their servers to be processed. If you turn on Siri on the Mac it sends data to Apple as well. However you can turn this off (or at least some of this from going to Apple) by going to the Keyboard preferences and under the Dictation section turning on the Use Enhanced Dictation feature. This allows offline use and does the processing on your computer. It also downloads about 1 GB of data when you turn it on (the first time - I hope it keeps it around if you turn it off).

      While I'm sure that the processor is powerful enough to do the work on the phone it would be a big drain on the battery, at least more than the network used. Also storing 1 GB would really get people complaining. And that would probably be per language. I would also imagine the RAM requirements for such a program would be fairly heavy too.

    3. Re:local processing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I imagine they will try to make this available offline eventually, because they do with other services that are related to travel. Google Translate (text/OCR via the camera) works offline, and Google Maps lets you download areas for offline viewing, and their new Travel app thingy has offline caching as well.

      The new always-on music identification system uses a local database too.

      It makes sense to do speech processing on the phone where possible, because it decreases latency. To give the best user experience the response needs to be fast.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:local processing by vipw · · Score: 2

      Having tried Sphinx, I feel comfortable saying it is terrible compared to the major players. All of them are doing the speech recognition server side. Nuance is probably the biggest technology vendor, but Google and Microsoft have their own in-house technology.

    5. Re:local processing by djrogers · · Score: 2

      It's more complicated than that - Siri does 2 things, speech-to-text, and AI/Assistant. The speech to text can be done on the phone directly (seriously - put your phone in airplane mode and use the dictation key, it'll work), but the AI/assistant part must be done on Siri servers in the cloud.

      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
  2. Happy ending by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I could see where this could be useful. Just last week, I went to the Thai massage parlor and the girl asked me if I wanted "the works". When I said yes, they gave me a mop and bucket and told me to start in the lobby.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  3. Re:Hmmm by Kazymyr · · Score: 2

    There are many settings where this could be very useful outside of the UN. Like any business dealing with a multi-ethnic customer base (and no, I don't mean multi-national corporations only - it could apply to many corner stores in NYC for example). Or that country that you've wanted to visit but you don't speak the language of, and they don't speak English.

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  4. Re:Hmmm by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    From what I've seen in stand-up comedy and TV shows, it could be useful for Americans wanting to take a vacation in the UK.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  5. The march of progress by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is clearly the most high-tech way yet to say: "My hovercraft is full of eels"

    1. Re:The march of progress by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2
      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  6. Re:Lessee... by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Number of times I wanted a translation in the past, Oh, I dunno, 50 years? 0.

    Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness,

    Actually, with that in mind, it's probably safest if you continue to stay where you are.

  7. Yoshi! by EzInKy · · Score: 2

    Any steps towards effective universal translators are most welcome!

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  8. So normal bluetooth headphones won't work for this by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This sounds like you need the GOOGLE earbuds to allow translation services, which happens on the phone. Is this just an attempt at vendor lock-in? Or will this work with any bluetooth headphone supporting device? I don't see how it could.

    This abandonment of the headphone jack really looks to be rather expensive and inconvenient to the end user. Almost feels like they are copying the inkjet printer refill fiasco.

  9. Re:Lessee... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

    Listen to music? About 8 hours a day.

    Translations in the last two weeks? A few dozen (China, Malaysia). These would be awesome to have just for the translation capabilities.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  10. Re:Babelfish by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Informative
    Orange? WTF?

    "The Babel fish is small, yellow, leech-like, and probably the oddest thing in the Universe. ... The practical upshot of all this is that if you stick a Babel fish in your ear you can instantly understand anything said to you in any form of language." - The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  11. Could be a killer feature, but... by fyzikapan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My first reaction upon reading this was, "Wow, that's a game changer. Time to embrace Google." This would be fantastic for someone like me who is routinely around people speak little to no English.

    Then I remembered that Google Translate mostly churns out total nonsense when going to/from Chinese, and I was less excited.

  12. Re:Babelfish by binarybum · · Score: 2

    Can't believe it took this long for a babelfish reference - and then you go and muck it up.

    --
    ôó
  13. Just try it.... by virtig01 · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. Grab an Android phone
    2. Open Google translate
    3. Tap "Offline translation", pick a language to download
    4. Put the phone into airplane mode
    5. Tap and talk

    Surprise, it works.

    1. Re:Just try it.... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Informative

      1. Grab an Android phone
      2. Open Google translate
      3. Tap "Offline translation", pick a language to download
      4. Put the phone into airplane mode
      5. Tap and talk

      ---

      Absolutely! As a quick test of my phone shows..

      1 Greta Indoor Fun
      did it open Google Translate
      three attacked offline translator pickup a a language to download
      for put the phone in airplane mode
      5 tape and talk

      Express, it works.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  14. Re:Lessee... by swillden · · Score: 5, Funny

    My guess is he is a suburbanite who is afraid of meeting new people so never has seen a foreigner.

    Fuck you monkey, go back to your own shitty hindustan, I don't want you here.

    Guess confirmed. In only 8 minutes!

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  15. Re:Languages don't work like that by grungeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So you mean Google does not know the context? Let's see:

    - They know your location
    - They know the weather and all events at the place where you are

    - They know your name
    - They know where you live
    - They may know your friends
    - They know what you watched on Youtube
    - They know what you have been searching for online
    - They know all things mentioned above about the person you are talking to

    Combine this with some facial expression recognition, which should be possible with iPhone8, and some more context recognition via camera, and you will have more context than most human translators would have.

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
  16. The BabelFish has come to pass by passionplay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All hail Douglas Adams. So long and thanks for all the fish.

  17. Re:Languages don't work like that by lindseyp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeaaahhh. Google Translate still makes a mess of written Japanese, despite being trained on that.

    Conversational Japanese is pretty much impossible to translate well to English on a phrase-by-phrase basis without loads of context. Even for humans. No way an earplug and google translate is going to pull that off.

    It would be pretty useful for tourist stuff though. asking prices, directions etc. I've seen some quite good demos of on-the-fly translation in that context.

    --
    j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
  18. Re:So normal bluetooth headphones won't work for t by tw2k · · Score: 2

    All good reasons on that link... until you remember that none of those reasons would apply if they had kept a 3.5mm headphone socket for wired headphones.

  19. Re:So normal bluetooth headphones won't work for t by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Translation does not happen on the phone. All what you hear will be sent to Google

    Precisely. Unless you simply download the small language pack in Google translate enabling it to work on video, audio and text completely offline. You know, like when you're in another country without mobile coverage.

    Oh what, didn't fit your narrative?

  20. Re:Languages don't work like that by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    That is just a completely stupid statement. None of that information provides context into a current conversation as they are situational dependent, and not dependent on your personal information.

    Translators can get far more context into translating language without knowing any of the above information.

  21. Re:Lessee... by JackieBrown · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I want this. In San Antonio it's very common for people to switch to Spanish whenever they see a white person come near.

    My brother and I made up a nonsensical language that we would switch to in elevators and other places when this would happen. We had no idea what we were saying but at least we helped the other people not be the only jerks in the room :)

    Just having it a work would be a dream when my peers and managers switch to Spanish and start giggling and laughing, Funny thing is that they get pissed when people from Korea switch to Korean in front of them

  22. Re:Hmmm by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    From what I've seen in stand-up comedy and TV shows, it could be useful for Americans wanting to take a vacation in the UK.

    Why is it that Americans moan about hard to understand UK dialects/accents, whereas no one here has any problem watching US TV shows whether they're set in Alaska, New York or Texas? Is American English just more homogeneous?

    Actually... yes.

    America has it's own regional dialects but it's nothing like Britain; with some exceptions, you can travel two or three states and not notice a change in accent. It's not like Britain where if you drive 30 miles from Merseyside to Manchester and the accent is vastly different.

    There's certainly a difference between a Boston accent and an Alabaman accent but it's not nearly as different as Geordie to west country.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  23. Re:Hmmm by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    Don't be numpty and spread such porkies la.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  24. Um, yeah... and the accuracy rate? by whitroth · · Score: 2

    First, how does it know, or do you tell it, what language to translate?

    And second... I read that red book that led me to want to learn more about lead, and wha's happenin', babeeee?

    At work, we have a "hybrid phone, and we get "voicemail previews" "powered by M% speech technology". They range from sorta-kind ok, to Vogon poetry. Now, *I* wouldn't let alpha software out the door, but we are talking M$, where *you* are the (unpaid) beta tester.