Slashdot Mirror


RIP AIM: AOL Instant Messenger Dies in December (usatoday.com)

It's the end of an era: as of December 15, AOL's Instant Messenger will no longer exist. From a report: In a statement from Oath, the new entity formed under Verizon combining AOL with the recently-acquired Yahoo, the service will be discontinued. "AIM tapped into new digital technologies and ignited a cultural shift, but the way in which we communicate with each other has profoundly changed," said Michael Albers, VP of Communications Product at Oath. AIM was a staple of personal computers since first launching in 1997, serving as a precursor to popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger. However, AIM couldn't make the seamless transition to mobile, where most users rely on instant messaging services. Users will be able to manually download any images or files on AIM before the service shuts down. However, users won't be able to export or save their Buddy List, the group of contacts available on AIM.

117 comments

  1. AIM still exists?? by JohnFen · · Score: 5, Funny

    I honestly thought it had died years ago.

    1. Re: AIM still exists?? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      I put a bump stock on my fleshlight. You can take it away when you wrest it from my cold, dead hands.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:AIM still exists?? by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      The last person using it forgot to turn it off when they left.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re: AIM still exists?? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Be careful. Chimpanzees are known to bite those things entirely off.

    4. Re: AIM still exists?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bump stocks or fleshlights? I can't imagine a bump stock being in the least appetizing heretofore said via the council-member inasmuch with the red carpet airplane mechanic

    5. Re: AIM still exists?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aol.
       
      I wonder who made billions suggesting that they remove the acronym formatting of the original name and make a useless transition to "Aol" and be smug enough to put a period on the end of it. Probably a group of orphaned Prodigy users.
       
      Whenever I see "Aol.," I hear "ahole" in my mind. Gay!

    6. Re: AIM still exists?? by Billary+Blinton · · Score: 0

      My cold, dead hands are ready for you.

    7. Re:AIM still exists?? by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

      Everyone I know still using it uses a 3rd party service that just forwards the messages as SMS to their cell.

    8. Re:AIM still exists?? by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      I honestly thought it had died years ago.

      IKR? I couldn't believe it was still a thing.....

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    9. Re:AIM still exists?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those were simpler times! I miss the old flower icon and swiss-army-knife style user interfaces of that era.

    10. Re:AIM still exists?? by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

      Forget about AIM. Does AOL still exist?

    11. Re:AIM still exists?? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You mean you didn't fill in the AIM username on your Slashdot profile and failed to keep the client open 24/7 in case someone needs to chat with you?

      Yeah, me neither.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:AIM still exists?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an ISP? No. As an email provider? Yes.

    13. Re:AIM still exists?? by tepples · · Score: 1

      That or they already keep Pidgin open in the background (perhaps for other reasons) and have an AIM account loaded into Pidgin.

  2. Getting RIPPED a new one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where then?

  3. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A billion dollar company cant afford to keep a few pentium4 servers, but they could when it was a million dollar company ?
    at least opensource it and let the domains go so others can carry on, or was the whole thing just a waste of a few million peoples lives and cash ?

    1. Re:Nice by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      ... or was the whole thing just a waste of a few million peoples lives and cash ?

      Maybe it'd be better for you if you never find out the answer to this.

  4. What will I do without my buddy list? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 0

    I'll miss all my buddies.

    1. Re:What will I do without my buddy list? by Sniper98G · · Score: 0

      It would just be a list of people's AIM names that don't work anymore. No real loss.

    2. Re:What will I do without my buddy list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll miss all my buddies.

      I know. It's hard to leave your buddy's behind.

    3. Re:What will I do without my buddy list? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      When I am ready to head out in the boat I always head on over here to get My Buddy.

    4. Re: What will I do without my buddy list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. A lot of those are also tied to the email address. For example my name was Cats and my email was Cats@aim.com.

      Is the email going away too?

    5. Re:What will I do without my buddy list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll miss all my buddies.

      I was disappointed to see Xfire go. Seriously, Battlefield '42 - DC mod ..... damn ... the glory ... the teabagging.

      Deadtoe, Blade, InjunMick .... where the hell are you. ;(

    6. Re:What will I do without my buddy list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll miss all my buddies.

      I know. It's hard to leave your buddy's behind.

      LOL

      Thats what he said...

    7. Re: What will I do without my buddy list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, @aim.com emails will keep working. (for now...)

  5. RIP by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

    Haven't used in almost a decade. Would've been nice if they'd spun it off instead of killing something still used by millions though. (quoted as single-digit millions by someone from AOL back in February)

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    1. Re:RIP by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      Haven't used in almost a decade. Would've been nice if they'd spun it off instead of killing something still used by millions though. (quoted as single-digit millions by someone from AOL back in February)

      No one would bother taking it. with people using third party aim clients to block ads, there's no money to be made to offset the expense of running the servers.

    2. Re:RIP by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Haven't used in almost a decade. Would've been nice if they'd spun it off instead of killing something still used by millions though. (quoted as single-digit millions by someone from AOL back in February)

      No one would bother taking it. with people using third party aim clients to block ads, there's no money to be made to offset the expense of running the servers.

      Funny what happens when you don't put some thought into "Hey, maybe my ads are annoying, obnoxious, and rude?"

  6. That took them long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'd expected Verizon to kill it on Oath-Day-One in favor of their cool new 10ct/text plans...

  7. Coincidence, so does the Trump administration. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bury it under the prison.

    1. Re:Coincidence, so does the Trump administration. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 0

      However, Trump's staff is more intent on seeing Twitter die.

    2. Re:Coincidence, so does the Trump administration. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, Trump's staff is more intent on seeing Twitter die.

      I'll cheer the day that happens and get the bitchers and moaners off the net.

  8. RIP AIM by WankerWeasel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    '90s kid me sheds a tear.

    1. Re:RIP AIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Entitled little shit.

    2. Re:RIP AIM by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Meh, 80's kid me understood that IRC was more than good enough for chatting.

      (Cue 70's kid's perspective)

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    3. Re:RIP AIM by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      The 70's kid in me just needs a quarter for the payphone...but I spent them all in the Pong machine...

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  9. Buddy List by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    "However, users won't be able to export or save their Buddy List

    The point of being able to export or save a list of "screen names" for a service that no longer exists would be what exactly anyway? People who had contacts that were actual AOL users probably have them as e-mail contacts anyway in whatever e-mail app they use.

    I mean I guess take a screenshot for posterity, if you feel like waxing nostalgic about all those conversations you had on AIM at some point in the future.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  10. Holy crap... by fallen1 · · Score: 2

    ..I am old. I remember ICQ and all the rest, too. Fuck, now I need some 18 year old scotch to help me forget. :-p

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

    1. Re:Holy crap... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      But make sure it's really 18 year old scotch. I once went home with something I thought was 18 but ... not worth the hassle, trust me, so not worth it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Holy crap... by JohnFen · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I remember ICQ

      I miss ICQ.

    3. Re:Holy crap... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I am old. I remember ICQ and all the rest, too. Fuck, now I need some 18 year old scotch to help me forget.

      At your age, you probably shouldn't be drinking.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re: Holy crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just have a seat down right over there.

    5. Re:Holy crap... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Oh, ICQ actually still works, it is just that most people have moved away from it. Still remeber my UIN better than my phone number.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    6. Re:Holy crap... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      ICQ Still works. I'm logged in right now.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    7. Re:Holy crap... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Modern-day ICQ is nothing like the original ICQ. That's why their current user base is 10% of what it used to be.

      I miss the old ICQ.

    8. Re: Holy crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL bought ICQ years ago and integrated it with AIM, I'm curious if Yahoo is planning too kill ICQ as well (assuming they are since it uses the same servers as AIM, they probably didn't even realize they bought it.) Haven't used AIM in years but still check in to ICQ daily.

    9. Re: Holy crap... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      AOL also sold ICQ to mail.ru years ago, it probably doesn't use the AIM servers anymore.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    10. Re:Holy crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, an ICQ hipster.

    11. Re:Holy crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's weird to think that I can now afford 18 year old scotch, but I couldn't 18 years ago (or even a computer really). So someone somewhere stockpiled scotch and held it for 18 years, in confidence that the 18-year-older version of me (or someone similar) would be able to buy it.

    12. Re:Holy crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..I am old. I remember ICQ and all the rest, too. Fuck, now I need some 18 year old scotch to help me forget. :-p

      I can relate to that!

      bev_tech_rob

    13. Re:Holy crap... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      But make sure it's really 18 year old scotch. I once went home with something I thought was 18 but ... not worth the hassle, trust me, so not worth it.

      ROTFLMFAO! Good one!

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    14. Re: Holy crap... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      AOL bought ICQ years ago and integrated it with AIM, I'm curious if Yahoo is planning too kill ICQ as well (assuming they are since it uses the same servers as AIM, they probably didn't even realize they bought it.) Haven't used AIM in years but still check in to ICQ daily.

      They probably virtualized those servers long ago and a simple press of the 'Delete' key will put those out of their misery.

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    15. Re:Holy crap... by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      modern day icq is total scam. they list hundreds of online chat rooms that when you click them take you to 1 room. every room link goes to 1 chatroom. clicked a few, the rooms had the very same people in it. no wonder its dead.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    16. Re:Holy crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ICQ still exists

    17. Re:Holy crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just logged in after several months. There are still three people online from my time in university. Two of them were really close friends back then. Haven't talked to them for years, though. Maybe I'll do it now...

      I too remember my ICQ number and don't know my mobile number. But it's no surprise since it's 4 digits shorter.

    18. Re: Holy crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it wasnâ(TM)t a true scotch

    19. Re: Holy crap... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, after half a bottle I sounded like a Scot (i.e. nobody sober could understand me), so I'd say it was.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. not from my view, it wasn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    AIM was a staple of personal computers since first launching in 1997

    Well... no. IRC started nearly 10 years before that, so AIM was a late comer. IRC was where all the cool people were. AIM was to IM what AOL was to the internet: a dumbed down non-federated service for the post-eternal-september crowd who didn't know any better, and mostly thought the internet was AOL. The intelligent discussion, and almost everything technical, was happening on IRC. Not to mention that anyone could start their own IRC server.

    Coincidentally, IRC is still going, and AIM is now dead.

    1. Re:not from my view, it wasn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can still be "a staple of personal computers" even if you personally didn't use and it something else predates it.

    2. Re:not from my view, it wasn't. by khandom08 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes and the eggdrops in our channel would immediately kick-ban any @aol.com users - All Only Lamers. Fun times.

    3. Re:not from my view, it wasn't. by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking a lot of people were migrating away from IRC to mostly Slack or Discord.

  12. Most of us used it at some point by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

    ...the market they helped define got filled up by better or more ubiquitous options.

    Personal messaging: Texting or social media. Everybody I know has a phone now. And if you use Facebook/Twitter, you're already connected to a majority of people you know.

    Work messaging: Newer apps like Slack that management settles on for everyone.

    1. Re:Most of us used it at some point by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 1

      SMS Text is mapped to a Phone Number which can be mapped to a real person.

  13. Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used it within the past 2 years, and I still had people on my buddy list who would pop up from time to time that dated back 15-18 years.

    Honestly the bad part for me, between this and YIM's effective closure between the horrible YIM change and the server hacking is that lots of people I had no other way to contact will have become impossible to contact now. Not that it is a huge loss since most of them were only contacting me when it convenienced them, but it is still a loss, especially since I am not on social media and have gone to a great deal of care to keep my RL and my OL lives separate making it almost impossible to find me without certain venues online, most of the others of which have already died out.

  14. a/s/l? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do u cyber?

    1. Re:a/s/l? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      14/f/CA mebbe

    2. Re: a/s/l? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pic? (Asking for a friend)

    3. Re:a/s/l? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the federal agent!

  15. Multi-billion dollar free service by ArhcAngel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About the only people still using AIM are commodities traders. You heard that right. There are thousands of traders right now sending frantically typed emails to their IT department demanding they continue to support AIM. How do I know? I've gotten a few hundred of them. They don't care that the service is shutting down because they don't understand how these chat programs work. They just know that they broker million dollar deals over this free chat system. AOL lost the ability to monetize the system once third parties clients, which didn't display the ads AIM did, came out. I suspect, but have no evidence, some of the trading exchanges eventually started paying AOL to keep the service going since so many of their customers rely on it. There's been talk for years of moving to something else but the chicken and egg syndrome is a hard egg to crack. To switch, so do all of your contacts. That would require the industry and all the companies in it to switch simultaneously. When was the last time you saw any big company do anything swiftly and simultaneously with not one but thousands of other companies?

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Multi-billion dollar free service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the chicken and egg syndrome is a hard egg to crack

      Is that a mixed metaphor or a confusing pun?

    2. Re:Multi-billion dollar free service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About the only people still using AIM are commodities traders.

      That's interesting stuff.

      Why don't they just use email? I hear commodity traders have access to super-fast networking..... ;) .. but snark aside, it sounds like a genuine issue. It sounds like something that a consulting company (Oracle?) would want to sell a half-baked solution to.

      Oh good lord, what if the industry went with something like IBM/Lotus SameTime? I'd love to see the odds against that solution crashing and burning before the end of January.

    3. Re:Multi-billion dollar free service by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Email tends to have some lag, and you won't necessarily know if the person on the other end is going to be avalible to read it now or will be going "huh" upon finding it in their spam folder a week or two later.

    4. Re:Multi-billion dollar free service by nbvb · · Score: 1

      That doesn't surprise me in the least... they come from the "get sh!t done quickly" group ...

      As I've aged, I've gotten to the "if it works..." stage with technology. These guys have been using AIM for two decades because the damn thing works, solves their problem and does so without causing any heartburn. We actually use it at work for very similar reasons. Sure, we have Slack and Jabber and Skype and email and all that -- but most of my team clings to AIM because it works ...

      I totally get it... not sure Young Me would have, but Older and Wise Me sure does.

    5. Re:Multi-billion dollar free service by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      A lot are moving to CME Pivot instead, which has been the front end for a lot of the AIM traffic anyway.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    6. Re:Multi-billion dollar free service by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Actually our entire infrastructure has moved to ICE Chat/IM. But that made the most sense since all our trades go through ICE.Thus the chicken/egg debate rages on

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    7. Re:Multi-billion dollar free service by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I think there's regulatory requirements regarding retention of emails.

    8. Re:Multi-billion dollar free service by antdude · · Score: 1

      Wow, unsecured IM protocol!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re: Multi-billion dollar free service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iâ(TM)m kind of surprised CME or ICE didnâ(TM)t buy AIM.

  16. Why not Open Source this and Classic Yahoo? by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 2

    Why not Open Source this and Classic Yahoo? Allow people to start their own OSCAR Services the AIM or YIM Clients are compatible with, but, change the host name to whatever you want?

    Currently, YIM is inoperative on Pidgin, soon AIM will be too. For Pidgin, this really doesn't matter. Some people liked the AIM and YIM Client software, a compatible "gateway" with connections to XMPP or Slack as a backend.

    I get it AOL/Oath doesn't want to maintain the service. Open Source it, and let independent organizations host their own.

    1. Re:Why not Open Source this and Classic Yahoo? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      Is there something OSCAR does that the Jabber protocol doesn't?

    2. Re:Why not Open Source this and Classic Yahoo? by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 1

      An unwillingness of end users to install other programs.

    3. Re:Why not Open Source this and Classic Yahoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support the official AIM and YIM clients?

    4. Re:Why not Open Source this and Classic Yahoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not Open Source this and Classic Yahoo? Allow people to start their own OSCAR Services the AIM or YIM Clients are compatible with, but, change the host name to whatever you want?

      Currently, YIM is inoperative on Pidgin, soon AIM will be too. For Pidgin, this really doesn't matter. Some people liked the AIM and YIM Client software, a compatible "gateway" with connections to XMPP or Slack as a backend.

      I get it AOL/Oath doesn't want to maintain the service. Open Source it, and let independent organizations host their own.

      It means that instead of riding free on AIM's cart, they'd have to run and administer their own servers.

  17. Unfortunate by yoda-dono · · Score: 1

    I've kept active on this service for many years now, through third party clients like Pidgin in Linux. I've never been a supporter of AOL, but use of the AIM service was almost standard for a while there, and I've since used it to converse with a number of friends who have thus far refused to embrace many other options. With the death of AIM, there's a real chance that my communication with some of these stubborn friends will take a step backward to indirect, less immediate interaction such as email. The only consolation of all of this, strangely, is that one of the main persons I've kept in most frequent contact with through AIM just got himself a prison sentence of a duration I'm not yet certain of (possibly multi year), so I've unexpectedly just lost one of my main needs for the service already this last month. So, strangely good timing, but really it is overall unfortunate, especially since they should just hand the service over to the open source crowd and let it grow in unexpected ways or die naturally, rather than just killing off something that not everyone has an acceptable alternative to.

    1. Re: Unfortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they buy out a competitor just to set it free to grow larger?

    2. Re:Unfortunate by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      I've kept active on this service for many years now, through third party clients like Pidgin in Linux. I've never been a supporter of AOL, but use of the AIM service was almost standard for a while there, and I've since used it to converse with a number of friends who have thus far refused to embrace many other options. With the death of AIM, there's a real chance that my communication with some of these stubborn friends will take a step backward to indirect, less immediate interaction such as email. The only consolation of all of this, strangely, is that one of the main persons I've kept in most frequent contact with through AIM just got himself a prison sentence of a duration I'm not yet certain of (possibly multi year), so I've unexpectedly just lost one of my main needs for the service already this last month. So, strangely good timing, but really it is overall unfortunate, especially since they should just hand the service over to the open source crowd and let it grow in unexpected ways or die naturally, rather than just killing off something that not everyone has an acceptable alternative to.

      You (and I) pretty much part of the reason that Oath is driving a stake through AIM's heart. Since you used Pidgin, you weren't contributing to AIM's ad revenue. In essence, you used resources without providing a return.

    3. Re:Unfortunate by yoda-dono · · Score: 1

      I had a friend back when it was really popular that steadfastly insisted on using the official AIM client, that is, until it woke him up in the middle of the night with ads, he was on Trillian in no time flat after that. Hard to say if it is really OUR fault their client didn't see more usage, they kind of had their chance on that one and blew it themselves. It is hardly anarchist to want to use something that just works, they still could have leveraged us in some other way, they had an installed base with active user accounts, they could have drawn us in to some other neat concept(s) down the line, with one login that can do many things (look at Google's umbrella of services that require just a single sign in). But no, they really AOL'd that one.

      (Oh, and the return I did provide was in keeping other people active on the service [I'm not in control of how they connect], sort of like how my friend, um... going away for a little while... negatively affects my needs of the service, my leaving would have given others less reason to stay. Not that anyone is stupid enough to run their client... if they even offer an official, up to date client anymore.)

      Anyway, I had been talking to people in an IRC group (I'm doing my part in keeping that alive, too!) just recently about how my need of AIM might actually go away before the service does... and now they're apparently trying to beat me to the punch, but luckily my friend's unlucky break has made the transition much easier (but not for him... hopefully he hasn't dropped any soap yet).

    4. Re: Unfortunate by yoda-dono · · Score: 1

      Why would they buy out a competitor just to set it free to grow larger?

      Obviously AIM isn't an aspect of the buyout they were particularly interested in...

    5. Re:Unfortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, one of the few instances where a close contact getting multiple years in prison is seen as a plus!

  18. Memberberries by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  19. This marks the end of an era.... by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

    AIM is essentially the last of the truly free services to go, at least services as widely used as this one was. Now you either pay up in cash, or essentially whore yourself out in the form of mined data.

  20. Their own doing... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

    ....when they stopped allowing 3rd party applications (e.g Pidgin) to connect (yes, they actively started doing that) they pushed away the last remaining users.

    I've had Pidgin on/off my 3 accounts over the last 15+ years. Haven't touched AOL's actual software in longer than that. Oh well...FB, G+/Hangouts and IRC FTW.

    (I'd say Skype to...but I can't get into my Skype account since Microsoft linked it to their accounts...)

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    1. Re:Their own doing... by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      Third-party clients can connect to AIM just fine. My Adium is connected to it.

      There was an issue earlier this year when they disabled a very old insecure auth method and blocked clients that used it, but all the clients had to do was update to the new (like, five year old) method.

  21. Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait... I thought AIM disappeared off of the planet when everyone switched from AIM to ICQ about 20 years ago. It was a very fast transition. Like ... one day everyone was on AIM, and then the next day nobody listed AIM in their sigs anymore, and everybody was using ICQ. It was eerie.

    p.s. I assume ICQ still uses "Uh oh" as its new message sound, but it's been 16 years since I used ICQ, so things might have changed.

  22. What really killed AIM by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 2

    AIM was a staple of personal computers since first launching in 1997

    And in 1998 corporate IT departments were busy trying to eradicate AOL from office computers because the AOL installation process replaced many Windows drivers with their own AOL-eccentric drivers. To IT departments, AOL was more like malware in that it took over the computer, thus AOL was banned from most workplaces.

    When Time-Warner and AOL merged back in 2000, one of the conditions forced on the merger by the FTC was that AOL had to make AIM compatible with other IM systems. Remember at the time of the merger, the majority of internet users (esp AOL) were still on dial up and TW cable was one of the few providers with an intact network poised to bring high speed internet to the masses. FTC officials feared that the merger of the world's largest internet company and the world's largest cable provider would put too much power in the hands of a single company. TW/AOL never did make a good faith effort to open AIM to IM rivals which was one reason they never made the transition to mobile - they resisted the urge to let AOL members to breach the "walled garden" of AOL, because advertising revenue inside that garden was their dominant monetizing strategy.

    Another condition that the FTC imposed was that TW had to open their network to competitors like EarthLink before AOL could be made available on their cable pipelines. TW/AOL never made that compromise, so AOL was stuck in dial-up.

    I was never fond of AOL because of their over-aggressive marketing, but I was never short on drink coasters from their CD-ROMs. They always arrived free in the mail and you could readily find them at the post office.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  23. AOL by AdamFistler · · Score: 1

    The only thing that's going to be left of AOL is a huge pile of CDs in a landfill somewhere just like the Atari E.T.

  24. @aim.com continues working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anyone with an @aim address can continue using that email address: https://help.aol.com/articles/...

  25. We used it at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We usedat work until 6m ago when lur auditing software stopped supporting it

  26. Ha ha by OYAHHH · · Score: 1

    I just signed up for an account on AIM last night. I need a messenger program on the PC to chat with my woman in private. Microsoft has messed Skype up so badly it is now practically unusable.

    Oh well, any recommendations? Something off the beaten trail but can do chat and send photographs? Maybe a few emojis tossed in as well.

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
    1. Re:Ha ha by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      ICQ generally is good, as is any XMPP server though your milage may vary. Both can be accessed via Pidgin, and XMPP is an open source protocol so you can find clients for it for pretty much any system that isn't hipster-levels of obscure...

    2. Re:Ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should definitely be using Wire.

    3. Re:Ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wickr or Telegram

      Maybe Slack and Discord

      Try Skype within the web browser on the Live Mail side bar which seems unfucked.

      There is just too many to choose from with many hurdles and security levels.

  27. what's a good alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use my AIM account to talk to maybe 1-2 people on their cellphones when I'm at my desktop because Pidgin is running on a Linux distro on a netbook a buddy gave me. I could use my cell, but I hate screen typing when I can use a real keyboard as an alternative. It's faster and muuuuuch more accurate.

    What other service that Pidgin connects to will allow me to effectively text said people as I have been doing?

  28. Gaim by netsurfr · · Score: 1

    So in December can we rename Pidgin back to GAIM?

  29. Memories - thanks for all the fish by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

    I started using AIM in 1998, around the time I graduated from high school.

    I did a study abroad while in college. It was the most cost effective way to have a semi real time chat with friends/family back here in the States.

  30. No EFnet to Freenode federation by tepples · · Score: 1

    AIM was to IM what AOL was to the internet: a dumbed down non-federated service [...] anyone could start their own IRC server.

    But how easily can users on one network of IRC servers talk to users on another network, such as EFnet to Freenode?

    1. Re:No EFnet to Freenode federation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how easily can users on one network of IRC servers talk to users on another network

      It was trivial, if you had a reasonable client. I did this all the time.

      The point isn't that every last network was connected, it was that YOU, the user, could talk to any of them or all of them at once, interact with people on several networks at the same time, and IRC did not belong to any one advertising company who excercised centraliized control over the whole thing. Anyone could start their own server, connect it to other servers if they wanted, or keep it private for just their friends. It was open, in the way most other IMs are closed. It left control in your hands, not the hands of some multinational that did not have your interests in mind.

    2. Re:No EFnet to Freenode federation by tepples · · Score: 1

      The point isn't that every last network was connected, it was that YOU, the user, could talk to any of them or all of them at once, interact with people on several networks at the same time

      And Pidgin is a multiprotocol client that lets YOU, the user, talk to AIM, Skype, or any other server for which a plug-in is available, just as easily as with multiple IRC or XMPP servers. So what's the practical difference between AIM closing down and a widely used IRC network closing down?

      I see three key differences between multiple IRC servers and multiple own-protocol servers. Which did I miss?

      • IRC networks use the same documented protocol.
      • Each single IRC network has a much smaller user base than each single network.
      • IRC never standardized how to handle a single user's multiple devices, such as a home computer, a work computer, a tablet, and a smartphone.

      Anyone could start their own server

      With no users other than you, because all the users are already on servers on other networks that refuse to link with yours. So a user who wants to IM users of other servers has to maintain an account on Freenode, QuakeNet, IRCnet, EFnet, Undernet, SlashNET, and EsperNet, just as with AIM, ICQ, MSN (now called Skype), and Yahoo! Messenger (when it was in operation).

      connect it to other servers if they wanted

      Only with the permission of the owner of the other server, which permission is hard to obtain for any notable network, I imagine. The last notable IRC server to allow any random server to link to it is eris.berkeley.edu, and the oldest IRC network (EFnet) is so called (Eris-free network) because its administrators formed a consensus to evict eris.berkeley.edu.

    3. Re:No EFnet to Freenode federation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not "just you". I run a private IRC network for about a dozen of my friends. I cannot do that with YIM or AIM or the others.

      The clients are open source.

      The servers are open source.

      IRC handles multiple devices just fine.

  31. Skype for Pidgin by tepples · · Score: 1

    A third-party plug-in for Pidgin supports Skype.

  32. Goodbye by plazman30 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When it shuts down, everyone better hear a door closing noise if they're logged in.

  33. Will ICQ remain? by aliquis · · Score: 1

    I don't know how they are connected.
    Could log into AIM with my e-mail but what I want to do is find my ICQ UIN and see if I can find an old friend there.

  34. Task for a machine learning programmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teach an algorithm to read peoples contacts and buddy lists off screen on AIM and export information to text on users computer then put said algorithm in a python program and let people download and for the non programmer types out there a secure site that can do the same just saving the contacts ti clipboard & if chosen a cloud storage service

  35. Multiple devices in IRC by tepples · · Score: 1

    I run a private IRC network for about a dozen of my friends. I cannot do that with YIM or AIM or the others.

    So how do "a dozen of [your] friends" communicate with others who don't use your network? As far as I can tell, they'd have to add another IRC server to their copies of Pidgin, just as they'd have to add Skype or whatever to Pidgin.

    IRC handles multiple devices just fine.

    I thought privileges in a channel were associated with a nickname, and only one connection to a server could use a particular nickname at once. What IRC server software doesn't have this limit? And what IRC server software stores and allows retrieval of a log of older messages, stores and allows retrieval of binary attachments, or allows the owner of a set of related channels (a "server" on Discord) to synchronize users' privileges across them? I ask because I'm trying to build a plan to move a few communities I'm in from proprietary stacks (Skype, Slack, Discord) to IRC without losing features on which we depend.