Slashdot Mirror


Neanderthal Ancestors May Be To Blame For Why You Can't Get a Tan (telegraph.co.uk)

turkeydance shares a report from The Telegraph: If you struggle to get a tan, consider yourself a night owl or are plagued with arthritis, then your Neanderthal ancestors could be to blame, a new genetic study has shown. Although Neanderthals are often portrayed in drawings as swarthy, in fact they arrived in Northern Europe thousands of years before modern humans, giving time for their skin to become paler as their bodies struggled to soak up enough sun. When they interbred with modern humans those pale genes were passed on. Likewise, genetic mutations which predispose people to arthritis also came from our Neanderthal ancestors, as did the propensity to be a night owl rather than a lark, as northern latitudes altered their body clocks. A raft of new papers published in the journals Science and the American Journal of Human Genetics has shed light on just how many traits we owe to our Neanderthal ancestors.

Scientists also now think that differences in hair color, mood and whether someone will smoke or have an eating disorder could all be related to inter-breeding, after comparing ancient DNA to 112,000 British people who took part in the UK Biobank study. The Biobank includes genetic data along with information on many traits related to physical appearance, diet, sun exposure, behavior, and disease and helps scientists pick apart which traits came from Neanderthals. Dr Janet Kelso, of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, in Germany, said: "We can now show that it is skin tone, and the ease with which one tans, as well as hair color that are affected."

118 comments

  1. Paywalled non-information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting, if only we could read it (without jumping through hoops).
    Probably done entirely with public money, but not for the public.
    Thank you.

    1. Re:Paywalled non-information by raburton · · Score: 2

      They ask you to sign up for a free account for full text, so you have to jump through one small hoop, but to describe it as "paywalled" and "not for the public" is simply false.

    2. Re: Paywalled non-information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they need to resell my email address it is paywalled.

    3. Re: Paywalled non-information by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Depends on your email address. What is it?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:Paywalled non-information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to join the club to be allowed in, it's not for the public. It's literally just for club members.

    5. Re: Paywalled non-information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      root@localhost

    6. Re:Paywalled non-information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the whole thing for free, no registration required.

  2. If you struggle to get a tan, consider yourself.. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    If you struggle to get a tan, consider yourself a night owl or are plagued with arthritis

    Stop spying on me, NSA!

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  3. Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article indicates that early humans developed strategies to avoid interbreeding, recognizing that there were dangers associated with doing so. Although many people consider religion ridiculous now, it may have provided a survival advantage at one time, promoting an orderly society. It seems like the attempts to avoid interbreeding may have also conferred a survival advantage, and that trait may persist to this day as racism and avoiding diversity. It makes me wonder if racism, awful as it is, may have once provided a very real survival advantage to early humans.

    1. Re:Racism by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 0
      Let me please answer your troll. First, interbreeding would be between humans and animals ; and regarding mixed-race relations, please have a read at this interesting article ; an excerpt, for starters:

      Mixed-race relationships are making us taller and smarter: Children born to genetically diverse parents are more intelligent than their ancestors

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First, interbreeding would be between humans and animals

      Crap. Interbreeding is just breeding between things that you've sorted into different categories. Referring to sexual activity between neanderthals and homo sapiens as interbreeding is fine.

    3. Re: Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're an asshole for labeling me a troll. I'm asking a serious question of whether racism is the evolutionary remnant of something that once conferred a survival advantage. I'm suggesting that humans evolved to avoid mingling and mating with those who looked and acted differently as a mechanism to prevent interspecies mating. What once might have provided an advantage to early humans is now probably harmful, but our genes haven't caught up to that reality.

      Early humans didn't understand genetics and the actual differences between them and neanderthals. Early humans looked different from neanderthals and probably acted differently. The article suggests that humans and neanderthals didn't just try to avoid interbreeding but also isolated themselves socially. If interbreeding was dangerous, there would have been a survival advantage to avoiding those who looked and acted differently.

      There are plenty of evolutionary traits that were once useful but no longer are. The desire to avoid mingling with those who looked and acted differently would have once served a purpose of preventing interspecies mating. The same trait might manifest itself today as racism. Although it would no longer serve a useful purpose, I'm suggesting that racism might be an evolutionary trait. Traits like skin color have evolved because of the latitudes that humans resided at. However, in the times were talking about, humans didn't travel the world and freely migrate as they do today. Europeans and Americans might well have never encountered anyone from Africa, and mixed-race mating might not have been much of an issue. However, interspecies mating obviously did occur.

    4. Re: Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One other thing... the fucking summary and non-paywalled article use the term "interbreeding" so I'm simply using the same terminology. Did you even read the summary before deciding to label me a troll?

    5. Re: Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullcrap, all interspecies breeding does is produce abominations with inferior traits. I see tons of cases where n1gger-w1gger abomination is either a faggot, or a tran, a child molester, a retard, a schizo etc.

    6. Re: Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP here. You're an idiot. Interracial mating should have the effect of increasing the gene pool diversity. The results would be better resistance to disease and a greater range of genes that should result in a more favorable outcome from natural selection. The latter probably explains the findings presented in the grandparent post.

    7. Re:Racism by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      The article indicates that early humans developed strategies to avoid interbreeding, recognizing that there were dangers associated with doing so.

      They didn't recognize anything. It's more dangerous not to interbreed. Inbreeding reinforces recessives.

      Although many people consider religion ridiculous now, it may have provided a survival advantage at one time, promoting an orderly society.

      Religion often still offers an advantage for the members, or a subgroup of the members. It just tends to shit on everyone else.

      It seems like the attempts to avoid interbreeding may have also conferred a survival advantage, and that trait may persist to this day as racism and avoiding diversity.

      No, those attempts to avoid interbreeding actually harmed viability. You want a broader gene pool to work with.

      It makes me wonder if racism, awful as it is, may have once provided a very real survival advantage to early humans.

      Nope, it's a bug. The tendency to avoid things that don't look like you is a defense strategy, but if you take it too far then you will miss out on needed genetics.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re: Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One other thing I didn't catch when I just replied to your post. Mating between blacks and whites isn't interspecies mating. We're all the same species. Now take your racism and bigotry and GTFO.

    9. Re: Racism by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "I'm suggesting that racism might be an evolutionary trait"

      Probably no need to resort to racism as evolutionary advantage as it looks to me to be too "refined". Ours is a social species, and social cohesiveness provides an obvious survival advantage to the individual. It's also that our intelligence is developed around prejudicing categorization (simplifying a lot: this movement on that bush is a lion that will eat me or is a gazelle I can eat? No, sorry, no time to gather further evidences -and if you fail too often, you either starve or will serve as predators' dinner).

      Everything else are emergent properties of these two traits: even as toddlers, we seek for answers much more than *proper* answers, i.e.: religion: we just can't satisfy ourselves with an "I don't know" answer, much better "this noise? is the thunder God, you know, that is in rage". Science? No, sorry, I just can't stand myself with neither "I don't know" nor "I don't give a damn" I *need* an explanation about what the hell are those bright spots on the night sky and why they move they way they move.

      Racism? Social categorization (us vs them) plus prejudice (if there are an "us" and a "them", one of those two sets *must* be better than the other -and it won't be "us", so it must be "them"). Racism is very easy, since allows to categorize "us" and "them" at first sight, even from afar. With time and social sophistication, racism becomes more subtle too: black vs non-black is just too easy, what about jews/non jews or arian vs non-arian?

      And did you see what I did here? A very nice rationalization instead of just saying "well, I have no idea".

    10. Re: Racism by turbidostato · · Score: 2

      "if there are an "us" and a "them", one of those two sets *must* be better than the other -and it won't be "us", so it must be "them""

      Obviously I meant the other way around.

    11. Re: Racism by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Food for thought.

      The one obvious downside of an interracial breeding is the inherent difficulty for the offspring, who, almost without exception, has a more difficult upbringing than a child bearing the physical traits in vogue at the time of the child's birth.

      Disadvantage is a double-edged sword; though it may cull out the weaker offspring and their chances of passing on their genetic line, the harsher conditions are also quite likely to temper the stronger crossbreeds who survive, giving them a breeding advantage.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    12. Re: Racism by rmdingler · · Score: 0
      Racism boils down to casting a discriminating eye toward those who are different.

      One theory gaining ground in anthropology: Neanderthals lost out to Homo erectus peoples, despite their larger brains and greater physical strength, precisely because of the innate, savage tendency of Homo erectus to kill those who were different.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    13. Re: Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an asshole for labeling me a troll.

      If you're offended at being labeled a troll, get off the internet.

      I'm asking a serious question of whether racism is the evolutionary remnant of something that once conferred a survival advantage.

      You're asking the wrong questions to get the answer to that.

      However, in the times were talking about, humans didn't travel the world and freely migrate as they do today. Europeans and Americans might well have never encountered anyone from Africa, and mixed-race mating might not have been much of an issue.

      While on an individual basis, you might be correct, on a genetic basis, you might want to examine the populations of the interchange areas, to see that they aren't quite so isolated as you may believe.

      At least for the European/Asian/African boundary areas. Obviously, the Americas were significantly more isolated.

    14. Re: Racism by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be homo sapiens rather than homo erectus? - see timeline

    15. Re:Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me please answer your troll. First, interbreeding would be between humans and animals ; and regarding mixed-race relations, please have a read at this interesting article ; an excerpt, for starters:

      Mixed-race relationships are making us taller and smarter: Children born to genetically diverse parents are more intelligent than their ancestors

      Sure, that explains all the mulatto Nobel Prize winners...

      Oh, wait....

    16. Re: Racism by johanw · · Score: 0

      No, it would be nlggers. Some of those nlggers interbred with Neanderthals, and the result evolved into modern humans. So humans evolved partly out of nlggers.

    17. Re: Racism by johanw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure. Neanderthals were also the same species according to your definition.

    18. Re: Racism by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

      You might have a point. Science has always had difficulty understanding how intelligence is inherited. Maybe they've been looking at it upside down, and it's actually stupidity that's inherited!

      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
    19. Re: Racism by hey! · · Score: 1

      The problem with these evolutionary behavior argument is that it's so easy to gin up a scenario to support whatever preconception you have.

      Now let's take the notion that we evolved to have preference for mates that look like us. In fact social psychologists have long shown that people are more attracted to others who resemble them. But there's a big difference between selecting a mate, and who you mate with. When you actually look at peoples' genes, it's clear people aren't nearly so picky about outbreeding as this suggests.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    20. Re:Racism by PPH · · Score: 1

      it may have provided a survival advantage at one time, promoting an orderly society

      Possibly. But that 'one time' predates modern societies and writing. People can't keep track of more than 100 to 200 personal relationships. And back in the days of tribes in the jungle or clans in the Neander valley, that sort of familiarity was necessary to maintain a cohesive social unit. You have trouble with a neighbor? You call for a village meeting, where the elders know everyone, who's honest, who's a fuck-up, etc. And action is taken. But this isn't practical for modern society, where any sort of productivity requires the smooth interaction of millions of people, banking and economic institutions and the rule of (written, not tribal) law. People you may never meet and so who cares what color they are. The need to maintain smaller tribal units and a "them vs us" policy has no place in modern society. Today, its a tool used by sociopaths who want to maintain absolute control of their immediate social group.

      If you want that 'small town' lifestyle, go find a piece of land, some willing followers and set yourself up as the next Warren Jeffs. But keep in mind that his followers lived off of a good amount of child support and welfare fraud (products of the outside world). And Jeffs (and many of his followers) are starting to show signs of inbreeding and becoming genetic dead-ends.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    21. Re: Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now it's perfectly clear you are a typical SJW. Differences in appearance means there are differences in internal constitution. You are conveniently dismissing that fact. And chromosomes aren't infinitely stretchable to accommodate all your stupid sand monkey diseases. What happens in reality - an abomination offspring receives half-assed mix of half-functional building blocks.

      Go read some real science, not your artsy fartsy woodoo bullshit, you retard.

    22. Re: Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I trust my evolved trait called uncanny valley, that I should avoid breeding with shit that does not look like me.

      And you can keep bumping your goats whatever you want, maybe one day you'll give birth to a man-bear-pig, and get some attention you seek.

    23. Re:Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Religion often still offers an advantage for the members, or a subgroup of the members. It just tends to shit on everyone else.

      Available rational objections available from an evolutionary framework: None

      The religious nature of say, Islam, isn't the atheist's primary problem. The primary problem is that if asked "leaving our religion entirely aside, what's your Darwinian objection to Muslims killing every last one of you as an opposing subculture, thus maximizing our DNA propagation?"... the answer is ultimately "er, actually don't have anything at all".

      And the same applies to other atheistic subcultures, say, Stalinist communism.

      But, then, I suppose they've already formally signed up for their inevitable elimination, rejecting any wider context or alternate possibility.

      Good luck with that.

    24. Re:Racism by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      what's your Darwinian objection to Muslims killing every last one of you as an opposing subculture

      Darwin is not God. I don't oppose cannibalism on moral grounds either, I oppose it on the grounds that I am very well-marbled.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re: Racism by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So, for thousands of years humans were predominantly segregated and evolving in tight groups, and now suddenly that is somehow bad for them?

      For thousands of years humans were fucking their children and dying of trivial diseases. Appeal to tradition: denied.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re: Racism by PPH · · Score: 2

      Regardless, there is no established conclusion that mating withing a closed circle is somehow bad.

      Ashkenazi Jews. British royalty. Hillbillies. Isolated animal populations. Lots of other counter examples.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    27. Re: Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      retard

    28. Re: Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a very simple mathematical reason why you're wrong. Randall Munroe describes it in his book -what if-. Apart from that: read up on biology some day. I take it that you've never done that, given your amazingly dumb comments.

  4. Other DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    What does it say about your ancestry if you're kind of orange? Asking for a friend, well not a friend, it's just that he's unlike most human beings and I'm a bit worried about his erratic behaviour. I think he might try to do something (even more) stupid.

    1. Re:Other DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely, you have Oompa Loomp's in your family tree, they aren't humans, but aliens from the Planet Screwball II.

  5. Big eyes in Japan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Neanderthal Ancestors May Be To Blame For Why You Can't Get a Tan

    They are also blamed for the plight of manga girls:

    https://science.slashdot.org/story/13/03/13/1247255/manga-girls-beware-extra-large-eyes-caused-neanderthals-demise

    Manga Girls Beware: Extra Large Eyes Caused Neanderthal's Demise

  6. Study by Ebsolas · · Score: 2

    The more study results I see on /. the more I come under the opinion that studies aren't real science. Rather they're a means to prove a point using whatever means possible.

    1. Re:Study by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One study is not science. One study is just one study, even if it's scientific. Science is a process. New scientific "discoveries" are often "bullshit". Once the science has been around for a while, and been reviewed, then it becomes relevant. Consequently we waste time discussing a lot of science-related bullshit here on Slashdot.

      That doesn't invalidate science, but it does suggest that people who see one study and say "see!?" are idiots.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re: Study by Ebsolas · · Score: 1

      So if it's not science then why is it on /.? I'm legitimately confused about this.

  7. Re:Oh, for crying out loud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bioinformatics and genetic data mining is absolutely at the forefront of computer science research today. Nothing is more appropriate as "geek news".

  8. So... by skovnymfe · · Score: 0

    Black people are purebred and white people are impure? What does this mean for those in favor of racial cleansing?

    1. Re:So... by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Black people are purebred and white people are impure? What does this mean for those in favor of racial cleansing?

      Denial

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you will find that racial purity is a mostly relative concept. A racially homogeneous population's purity could indeed be threatened by interbreeding with another population, no matter how much "purer" the invading population is considered to be relative to some starting point.

    3. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a banana, white beast of burden.

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means white people need to keep what little neanderthal DNA they have left as concentrated as possible. Neanderthals are where intelligence and the ability to form complex societies forms from. Places with Neanderthal DNA grew into the advanced civilizations we have today in Europe and Asia. Africa is, well, Africa. Without Neanderthal DNA the whole planet would be African.

    5. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DNA tests have shown the "brown people" who built Ancient Egypt where Indo-Europeans. Sorry, but you shouldn't get your history lessons from Nation of Islam or whoever is peddling the "we wuz kangs" fake history.

    6. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a fucking retard

    7. Re:So... by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      There's no denying we've been presented with a catchy mnemonic device:

      No-tan-at-all

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    8. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This raises an interesing question. Would it be possible to backbreed a Neanderthal?

    10. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sorry to burst your bubble, but the world is African. You seem to be ashamed of your African roots.

      Neanderthals won their Darwin award already, and never did form complex civilization. Join them if you wish.,

      Travel much? There is no corner of the planet without advanced civilization. Nor is there any culture entirely lacking merit. You might enjoy investigating this truth. I surely have.

      It should be noted that the bloodiest wars in history have happened in "places with Neanderthal DNA". There is no race that is innocent.

      Fact is, all our civilizations/cultures are works in progress, and it seems to me that working to improve the society you are immersed in is more productive than trying to point out the failings of those of which you are _clearly_ ignorant.

    11. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blacks migrated out of Africa snd rsped the Neanderthals in Europe, and the Denisovians in Asia.
      This created two new strains of hybrids who benefitted from greater intellect and who proceeded to use the original inferior black strain as beasts of burden ever since.

      The neanderthal/african hybrid was smarter and rose to rule the world. The denisovian hybrid benefitted from sharing genes with the neandethals as the denisovians anf neanderthals were cousins of sorts, and they too grew to greatness.

      The original strain stayed true to type and couldn't manage to generate one noteworthy accomplishment in the entire course of human history.

      Even what little the Africans have managed to do is best explained by the later migration of Neanderthal genes INTO Africa.

    12. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We wuz kangs an sheiiiit" !

      FTFY

    13. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China, Europe, and The Americas all developed writing systems. Africa did not. This is a fact. Deal with it.

    14. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blacks are very rapey, so this hypothesis makes complete sense.

    15. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump!

    16. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the people building pyramids did this without written language and bureaucracy?

  9. Re: Oh, for crying out loud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mine me some vaginas, I'm tired of this stupid shitty world.

    Maybe I'll just go on killing spree.

  10. Re:Oh, for crying out loud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is nothing even close to /. material.

    -jcr

    Huh. I've been reading slashdot since the 90s and honestly thought this was interesting. Now, as for a lot of the other crap on here.... well, no.

  11. Re:Oh, for crying out loud. by thomst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    jcr snorted:

    This is nothing even close to /. material.

    Oh really?

    a. /. supposedly is "News for nerds."

    b. I'm an unashamed nerd. I'm also a night owl, I burn, rather than tan, and I suffer from "moderate" osteoarthritis. And I'm of northern European extraction (Irish, Welsh, and Prussian to be precise). For all those reasons, this interests me.

    I'll bet you a shiny, new quarter I'm not alone, either ...

    --
    Check out my novel.
  12. Re:Oh, for crying out loud. by alvinrod · · Score: 2, Funny

    That may be true, but you don't hear about many Neanderthal women getting into programming, so clearly we should be talking about the gender gap instead.

    Though come to think of it, I'm not seeing any Neanderthal men either, so it must be a full blown racial issue!

  13. Tan? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    that's Sin/Cos isn't it ?

    I didn't know neanderthals had worked out trigonometry

    1. Re:Tan? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      With all that interbreeding, at least they had their sin worked out.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  14. Re:White People are not 100% Human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You have to be African for that.

    White people are a100% human. Black people are a 100% human as are all other groups of people. All people should be treated fairly and be given a chance to develop their talents. It is morally wrong to deny any person a decent life or a chance for a decent life because of notions of racial classifications. In same way it is wrong to deny either sex an equal chance. Even more importantly it is stupid.

  15. My ancestry includes by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    2.5% Neanderthal, and about 80% European. I tan just fine.

    1. Re:My ancestry includes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, it does occur to you that Neanderthals probably had some other genes beside the non-tanning ones, right? Or do you think that you have 40 times as many genes as a Neanderthal, and the 2.5% of your DNA includes a complete set of Neanderthal genes?

    2. Re:My ancestry includes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2.5% Neanderthal, and about 80% European. I tan just fine.

      That explains your tiny penis then.

  16. Easy solution by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just do it like the Neanderthal-in-Chief and use Tan-in-Bottle.

    1. Re:Easy solution by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's an insult to Neanderthals

  17. Re:Oh, for crying out loud. by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Genetics isn't a nerdy science topic? The fuck are you smoking today and may I have some?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  18. Re: Snow white? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I beg to differ. Product of an interspecies breeding is always a fagget or some other pervert, or a child molester, or a retard.

    I would disagree, but by offering yourself up as evidence you make your point quite well.

  19. But I can get a tan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand the claim made by the headline. I don't know a single person that can't tan no matter their skin tone. I'm pretty dark and I still tan.

    1. Re: But I can get a tan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you know any red heads?
      Some of them do not tan; they just burn.

    2. Re: But I can get a tan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a red head, and I still don't tan, just burn.

      GP has it backwards, its the LIGHT skin and not tanning that is the topic

  20. Re: Snow white? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take up the White Man’s burden—

    Send forth the best ye breed—

    Go send your sons to exile

    To serve your captives' need

    To wait in heavy harness

    On fluttered folk and wild—

    Your new-caught, sullen peoples,

    Half devil and half child

    Take up the White Man’s burden

    In patience to abide

    To veil the threat of terror

    And check the show of pride;

    By open speech and simple

    An hundred times made plain

    To seek another’s profit

    And work another’s gain

    Take up the White Man’s burden—

    And reap his old reward:

    The blame of those ye better

    The hate of those ye guard—

    The cry of hosts ye humour

    (Ah slowly) to the light:

    "Why brought ye us from bondage,

    “Our loved Egyptian night?”

    Take up the White Man’s burden-

    Have done with childish days-

    The lightly proffered laurel,

    The easy, ungrudged praise.

    Comes now, to search your manhood

    Through all the thankless years,

    Cold-edged with dear-bought wisdom,

    The judgment of your peers!

  21. big tobacco by wolfheart111 · · Score: 0

    ""Scientists also now think that differences in hair color, mood and whether someone will smoke or have an eating disorder Sponsored by big tobacco... and of course Mc D's

    --
    [($)]
  22. Re: Snow white? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So white people are monkey fuckers?

    LOL. Glad to know that black is the real pure ;)

  23. Re:White People are not 100% Human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet you believe in the Tooth Fairy, too, don't you?

  24. Re:Oh, for crying out loud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nah this isn't really 'bioinformatics.'.. it's a cleverly disguised anti-white SJW article.. (see! look! if you're white, you're inferior!)

    It's posted by beauhd after all..

  25. Neanderthal Master Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're the real victims of cultural appropriation - we invented the wheel.

  26. Well, what's it feel like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how does it feel to be a member of the Illuminati?

  27. Re:Oh, for crying out loud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the summary suggests that the Neanderthals arrived to Europe "thousands of year" before the modern humans instead of being developed in here and nearby areas for a 500k years, in the accordance of /.-traditions I'm going to claim that it was exactly 6000 years ago. The summary is the perfectly cromulent /.-troll this time.

  28. Re:Oh, for crying out loud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep searching /. pages like this one, and the *only* place I see the phrase "News for nerds" is in posts like yours.

  29. Re:Oh, for crying out loud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh... why would you want to smoke something that makes you stupid and cantankerous?

  30. You Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Neanderthal Ancestors May Be To Blame For Why You Can't Get a Tan"

    I can tan just fine, it's feeling included I have problems with.

  31. If you can't get a tan, stop trying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and realize that a tan is nothing more and nothing less that visible evidence of UV damage correlated with an increased risk of malignant melanoma.
    Skin cancer is no joke, and no fashion statement.

  32. Re: White People are not 100% Human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill yourself, stupid piece of shit. I don't want to breed with your shitty sand monkeys, or smelly hindu-chimps.

  33. Its always my ancestors fault by Arzaboa · · Score: 1

    I got bad hair from my mom. I stink cuz of my grandpa. I have bunions cuz of my great-grandmothers mail man. I highly doubt anyhow that its only because of neaderthal's as almost any creature that can live a long time gets ware and tear.. as in arthritis.

    -Arzaboa

    --
    "Respect your Elders!" -- Grandpa.

  34. Re: White People are not 100% Human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill yourself, stupid piece of shit. I don't want to breed with your shitty sand monkeys, or smelly hindu-chimps.

    I want to ...
    http://st1.bollywoodlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/priyanka3.jpg

  35. Re: Oh, for crying out loud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see the hypersensitive right-wingers havenâ(TM)t yet found their safe space. Seriously dude, this article has nothing to do with your political bullshit.

  36. Re: Snow white? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AFAIK all modern humans are descendants of this interbreeding. So even if your skin is black you have Neanderthal genes.

  37. Re: White People are not 100% Human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is foaming at the mouth required for KKK-members, or do you just think that it's cool?

  38. Re:Snow white? by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    yea, living in the gravelpits of flanders, hellgium probably the part where they collaborated most during the actual was (which was lost btw ... Hitler is not alive ,and actually without the other three he would have been like never anything but the corporal who could but that aside i often wonder) why are these couch nazis so bent on beach vacations and getting a tan ? i mean whitepower and shit, right?
    makes as much sense as the hackers-on-meth doing abortion clinics i mean do you think baby-hitler wouldnt have wanted abortions to keep eugenics on top ?
    not that the leftists make any more sense
    actually not that any -ist makes any sense to me, all i hear is ME ME ME, and you cant speak !

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  39. Re:Not convinced. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter what color a person's skin is, "rich privilege" wins out. People who end up with money love to pretend that it's natural for them to have it.

    Who the hell is that? Everyone I know that is rich knows it's not natural. They won the lottery of life. If they have kids it can all be gone in less than a year. Even if it's hundreds of millions. It's also very hard to keep it. Everyone wants to part you from your money.

    Just as the poor are poor for a reason. There will always be poor. They can't handle money. If you work with them, that becomes clear fast. So stealing it from the rich doesn't help.

  40. Re: White People are not 100% Human by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Not just KKK members. Antifa, democrats, etc. Anyone on the left. Any of the fascists. That was the whole joke in Charlottesville. We had the KKK and Antifa - both leftists, both democrats and they were fighting each other. Both are racists and they were complaining about old racists. For those of us on the right we're like - yea? Can't we just sit back and watch you bigots kill each other?

  41. Re:white privilege by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neanderthals aren't white, they are asian/oriental/mongoloid. They originated in Asia, not Africa.

  42. Re:Oh, for crying out loud. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Sprechen sie English?

    Do you want to have a fuck with "jcr", or you want to smoke the come after the fuck? Won't it make your papers wet and sticky and hard to light?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  43. Re:Oh, for crying out loud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The /. tagline used to be "News for nerds, stuff that matters". It was dropped quite a few years ago though.

  44. That's very primitive thinking... by iq145 · · Score: 1

    (snicker snicker)

  45. Re: Not convinced. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using the phrase "less evolved" reveals you to be an idiot. That's not how evolution works, nothing is less evolved because evolution isn't working towards some goal. The fact that white Europeans have Neanderthal dna as opposed to Asians with donisovan or African with just larger genetic diversity in general doesn't make any one geographic genetic group better or worse than any other except in specific instances, as in "one group is better able to resist malaria"