Slashdot Mirror


Alphabet's Balloons Will Bring Cellphone Service To Puerto Rico (wired.com)

An anonymous reader writes:Hurricanes Irma and Maria wiped out more than 90 percent of the cellphone coverage on Puerto Rico. Now the FCC has given "Project Loon" permission to fly 30 balloons more than 12 miles above the island for the next six months, Wired reports, to temporarily replace the thousands of cellphone towers knocked down by the two hurricanes.

Each balloon can service an area of 1,930 miles, so the hope is to restore service to the entire island of Puerto Rico and parts of the U.S. Virgin Islands. In May Project Loon, part of Google's parent company Alphabet, deployed its technology in Peru and later provided emergency internet access there during serious flooding. (Those balloons were acually launched from Puerto Rico.) These new Project Loon balloons will be "relaying communications between Alphabet's own ground stations connected to the surviving wireless networks, and users' handsets," according to the article, which reports that eight wireless carriers in Puerto Rico have already consented to the arrangement.

65 comments

  1. Now this is real help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great idea, and not just a marketing puff like we get from Elon.

    1. Re:Now this is real help by krelvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously... How is Tesla sending hundreds of its Powerwall battery systems Puerto Rico.. just a marketing ploy? Tesla started sending hundreds of its standalone power banks, and some have already arrived while more are en route.

      A physical product that works well in the field.

      The grid is down and it will take a long time get a lot the Puerto Rico areas back on a grid that currently doesn't exist now. The powerwall is recharged by solar.

      What good is a cell phone when you need power now and can't even charge a cell phone. And you need power for other necessities more than a Cell phone where they tell you help is not available now.

    2. Re: Now this is real help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll have to wait for reports of Pwalls actually making a difference to know. (and from someone besides Elon)

    3. Re:Now this is real help by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree with almost everything you have said, but I'd like to address the last sentence: people on the island right now are using cell phones when they have access to send text messages (which require must less electric power). Some people have been keeping their cell phones off except for when they know they are near a functioning tower, and some people have been using cars to recharge them. I agree that at this point, many of those have likely worn out, especially because many people didn't bother doing this because they weren't anywhere near a functioning tower at all, but it isn't like there's no help from this. This also combines with the fact that damage isn't the same everywhere: some places have power but no cell coverage even as others have the reverse. So you are correct that Tesla's work will be helpful, but this will be too.

    4. Re:Now this is real help by blindseer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What good is a cell phone when you need power now and can't even charge a cell phone. And you need power for other necessities more than a Cell phone where they tell you help is not available now.

      I think of the reports of the "Cajun Navy" in Texas that went out to rescue people stranded by flood waters, or in need of supplies to shelter in place. The people in the "Cajun Navy" were volunteers that were not part of any larger rescue organization, they had no real plan in place and no real hierarchy. These people were able to coordinate over cell phones and internet because cell service survived or was restored quickly. The people in need of help may have cell phones in need of a charge, or no cell phone at all, but the people coming in to help could use the cell service to be more effective.

      The people that planned ahead for a smaller storm, with hand crank cell phone chargers among their survival kit, would certainly appreciate cell phone service to contact family and let them know all is well (which would prevent a diversion of resources for a search and rescue of such people) or if they are in need of supplies then they can contact others to assist in their coordination.

      At a minimum we have people in need of communication for their mental well being. Humans are complex social creatures and even knowing that help is not available now is better than knowing nothing at all. People need to know that there are other people out there that have not given up and are trying. Maybe some of these people will use the cell phone service to watch cat videos, but then at least this distracts from how cold and hungry they are.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    5. Re:Now this is real help by ColaMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's right, because USB ports in cars and plain old cigarette lighter car chargers and solar chargers and small generators that are already running critical equipment and the like simply do not exist.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    6. Re: Now this is real help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it isnâ(TM)t since my friends confirmed there isnâ(TM)t a problem with coverage.

    7. Re: Now this is real help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Two of my friends went down there to help, and they confirmed that they got better coverage with AT&T even after the hurricane than we got here before in Seattle. I missed a call last week from Microsoft for a job interview. They have better coverage over their small island that we do in the US.

    8. Re:Now this is real help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People could easily charge cell phones in that situation, a lot have cars. You dont even have to start them and waste gas to charge your phone from the car battery. Yank that battery out of the car, attach a car charger to it, you could likely get a months or more worth in charges off a single car battery.

      Or leave the battery in place and use it the same way though the cars cigarette lighter, youll waste more power on the car's phantom loads in the accessory position, but could easily start the car every couple days to top off the battery.

      I saw this being done quite frequently in Florida after Irma went though and we were without power days. People hanging out in their running cars for AC and to charge phones.

    9. Re:Now this is real help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you live on a third-world island that frequently is a magnet for caribbean warm-water-pumped storms that wipe out your pitiable 'infrastructure', you should make friends with, and help support the hobby of, a local Amateur Radio Enthusiast and their Club. S/HE will DEFINITELY be smarter than the local government and have the knowledge and abilities to stay 'on the air' for those critical 'preferred customer' stateside "yeah, we're still alive" as well as those all-important "help us get the fsck outta here!" messages.

      hell, even an el-cheapo 2-meter handie, a license, and some involvement in the local club will assure you the help of a buddy to get your important comms back&forth - Hams Always Take Care Of 'Their Own' First. I've even been copying traffic out of PR up here in New England and made a few phone calls for people.

      if you and all the unthinking cattle around you depend upon your battery-operated 'phartsmones' to save your @$$ when the 'professional' communications and power infrastructure is nearly-crap to begin with then you totally deserve your immediate future.

      73

    10. Re: Now this is real help by jimtheowl · · Score: 0

      We will be awaiting the report on your efforts in this matter with great anticipation.

      We believe in you AC.

    11. Re: Now this is real help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slight correction....Puerto Rico IS in the US. Maybe you ment in the continental USA?

    12. Re: Now this is real help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F u and you crappy KP4 shit

    13. Re:Now this is real help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow.
      Are you charles or david kock?
      Or are you just the kock sucker whose job it is to troll here when you are not having your head banged against the wall while sucking one them?

      Well, in the meantime, I'm sure that you are making good money just trolling for them or Russia.

    14. Re:Now this is real help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      relatively few PRs own a car, so, yeah.

    15. Re:Now this is real help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you live on a third-world island

      Where would that be? Puerto Rico _is_ The United States. By definition, the United States is not a third world country, no matter how bad some parts of it can get. The definition comes from the cold war. The 1st world was the US and its satellites, the 2nd world was the USSR and its satellites, and the third world was everywhere else.

  2. what's the catch? by sittingnut · · Score: 3, Interesting

    or is this just for good public relations/"corporate social responsibility" ?
    sorry if my skepticism about all thing alphabet, and other big techs, offends anyone; i just can't be blind to their past track record.

    btw, given we have been hyped about these balloons for years, why is there no real wide deployments(announced several times in multiple countries) up to now?

    1. Re: what's the catch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The catch is that youâ(TM)re an idiot autist who canâ(TM)t comprehend doing something nice because you can

    2. Re:what's the catch? by Krishnoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      or is this just for good public relations/"corporate social responsibility" ?
      sorry if my skepticism about all thing alphabet, and other big techs, offends anyone; i just can't be blind to their past track record.

      I'm sure you're completely correct --

      btw, given we have been hyped about these balloons for years, why is there no real wide deployments(announced several times in multiple countries) up to now?

      it's that the local carriers probably reached the tipping point where allowing another player on the field, was more in their best interest than trying to protect their monopolies in the near absence of infrastructure (including their own).

      If I had to guess, I'd say Google ran Loon as a research-ish project to flush out problems and develop its feasibility. I personally think Google tries to do a lot of good. But if that's not the case, I'll concede that they may be evil; after which to be fair, I'd have to contrast their actions against those of the entire corporate (and governmental) landscape.

    3. Re: what's the catch? by Ken_g6 · · Score: 0

      I would guess that the wireless carriers will pay huge roaming charges to Google until they can fix their own towers. I hope that cost won't be passed on to consumers.

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    4. Re:what's the catch? by UperPoti · · Score: 1

      The expected value of goodwill and roaming fees from this outweighs the expected costs associated with patent royalty liabilities and negative goodwill costs for Space Data associated with a lawsuit for this situation?

    5. Re:what's the catch? by cdsparrow · · Score: 1

      They are doing a good thing. I'm sure that they have some per day costs that they would otherwise charge and will take that as a tax deduction, but still a good thing.

      And I'm not really sure that these things are really made for any permanent installation anywhere, so they are being used to do what they are made specifically for. I' know that groups want to use them long term in places, but I don't see them being cost effective over any long term in most places.

    6. Re:what's the catch? by swillden · · Score: 1

      i just can't be blind to their past track record.

      What track record are you referring to, specifically?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:what's the catch? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      btw, given we have been hyped about these balloons for years, why is there no real wide deployments(announced several times in multiple countries) up to now?

      Probably because they're not that great. Who needs balloon-based data service in non-emergency, non-disaster situations?

    8. Re: what's the catch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your balloon are belong to us!

    9. Re:what's the catch? by citizenr · · Score: 1

      The catch is they just lost a Loon lawsuit. Google tried to steal technology and patents pretending to be interested in buying out a startup.

      https://www.wired.com/story/th...

      its not the first time Google flat out steals someone elses technology, to the point of being sued for racketeering http://www.mercurynews.com/201...

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  3. EIGHT wireless carriers with towers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    holy fuck. that little island has more competition for cellular service than the mainland.

    1. Re:EIGHT wireless carriers with towers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      competition from Mexican carriers because of proximity to Mexico, both geographically and culturally

  4. Fed up with sub-par editing... by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...Each balloon can service an area of 1,930 miles...

    How about

    Each balloon can service an area of 1,930 square miles...

    Bold and additions mine...

    1. Re:Fed up with sub-par editing... by Krishnoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, it's a circular service area. So it would be circular miles. Or circular areolar miles, if you want to get technical.

    2. Re:Fed up with sub-par editing... by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

      http://m-w.com/dictionary/impl...
      Each balloon can service a distance of 1,930 miles.
      Each balloon can service an area of 1,930 square miles.
      Each balloon can service a volume of 1,930 cubic miles.
      Each balloon can service a tessera of 1,930 cubic mile-seconds.
      Each balloon can service a manifold of 1,930 cubic mile-square seconds.
      Each balloon can service a tangle of 1,930 cubic mile-cubic seconds.

      and so on.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    3. Re:Fed up with sub-par editing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So it would be circular miles.

      You imperials don't cease to surprise me.

    4. Re:Fed up with sub-par editing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1930 mi = pi*r^2, solving for r gives us a radius of 24.78 mi.

      Puerto Rico's area is 3,515 mi, however, the mainland measures about 110.5 mi by 40.3 mi. Not accounting for terrain, 3 balloons will give near complete coverage, and 5-6 balloons will give complete coverage. (A square 35 miles on the side will fit inside the circle.)

  5. Strip mining the remains of Puerto Rican's privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What else do you do when you don't settle for being merely evil?

  6. And people said it was useless by Ayano · · Score: 1

    What say now brown cow? Reminds me of the laser.

    --
    I don't read AC
    1. Re:And people said it was useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't remember it being touted as an emergency service.

    2. Re:And people said it was useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're sending lasers to Puerto Rico now too? Oh boy are the sharks are gonna love that!

    3. Re:And people said it was useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still Is useless These people not Food And Water not to check the Box Scores for the Nicks game.

  7. Rough Weather? by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

    Just wonder what happens to the ability to communicate when really rough weather comes in?

    Everything works really great in a calm pristine environment. But maybe infrastructure is like coding, it is the exceptions that get you ;)

  8. I was curious by OnTheEdge · · Score: 1

    I recall reading this article a few years ago while staying at my sister's place in Merced and wondering if this could be done for PR . . . . I guess it can. Cool. http://www.mercedsunstar.com/n...

    1. Re:I was curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was my first thought when I heard that Puerto Rico lost cell phone service. I posted it in the slashdot article a few weeks ago. Maybe they saw my post!

  9. Don't think there is one by Solandri · · Score: 2

    Because of inertia and reluctance to leave older, established technologies, it's not often that you get a chance to try out a widescale deployment of a theoretical new technology in a developed nation. Implementing it in some place like Africa wouldn't stress it as much as a developed nation would, so the results and conclusions aren't always applicable to a different market. This is actually a great opportunity for them to do a real-world test of whether this balloon cellular idea works as well as it does on paper in a first world nation.

    Google is probably as anxious to get some real-world data from a widescale implementation, as Puerto Rico is to restore cellular service. And then they can know if this is something worth pursuing in the future, or if there's some unforeseen fly in the ointment which will lead them to shelve the project.

  10. You owe me 27 trillion dollars by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    Where should I send the invoice?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. Sad to see Google is wasting money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instead of allowing their own employees vacation time. I've worked for Google for a couple of years and no one was allowed to take any time off other than a long weekend. That money would be much better spent to allow us time off.

    1. Re: Sad to see Google is wasting money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We donâ(TM)t allow white people any time off like more companies in the Seattle area. Graduated from Iowa State in 1983, and Iâ(TM)ve never been allowed to take an entire week off.

    2. Re: Sad to see Google is wasting money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the high cost of communication, of course we canâ(TM)t get time off. Fred Brooks wrote about this almost fifty years ago.

    3. Re:Sad to see Google is wasting money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get paid enough to make-up for the fact that tech employees don't get any time off.

    4. Re: Sad to see Google is wasting money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked in tech for twenty-seven years in the Seattle area, and I donâ(TM)t know anyone that was allowed a real vacation.

    5. Re: Sad to see Google is wasting money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet I still find plenty of time to reply to myself on slashdot.

    6. Re: Sad to see Google is wasting money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems doubtful.

    7. Re:Sad to see Google is wasting money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So sad. I averaged almost 90 hours per week in my first 13 years of employment as an engineer. Long weekends? Wow. There was a two year period in the early 90s where I worked every single day. Grow up and pay your dues.

    8. Re: Sad to see Google is wasting money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dues? what a waste of your life. slaving away.. for what?

  12. Doing good deeds. by Templer421 · · Score: 1

    What does it matter WHY?

  13. Re:What good is a cell phone? by OldMugwump · · Score: 1

    What good is a cell phone? How about calling 911? Or doing business? Coordinating reconstruction? Medical advice? Telephones are pretty critical infrastructure - it's hard to think of anything more so. And they're easy to charge even without mains power - you can charge from car and truck batteries, solar cells, generators - all are sufficient to charge lots of phones, because they don't need much power.

    --
    "Shoot, a fella could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas with all that stuff."
  14. Phone company asleep or on top of it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the folks who live there taking care of themselves or not?
    How many towers were down and how many has the phone company gotten back up so far?

    How does their repair rate compare to Texas after the last hurricane??

    1. Re:Phone company asleep or on top of it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than 90% of the cell towers were damaged by hurricane Maria.

      And you really this ignorant to compare TX with PR? It is like comparing the Moon to the Sun. You can easily drive the aid to the VERY SMALL AREA affected by the hurricane ... not the same with PR.

  15. What else will these balloons do? by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    A known spying organization is deploying balloons to help the Puerto Ricans communicate in their time of need. This need is genuine and I'm sure everyone is grateful for the assistance. Therefore this sounds very nice and a good thing to do for any organization. But in light of what Google does with its services (email accounts, blog hosting, phone call proxy/rerouting, etc.) and the article's lack of describing any restrictions on this generous service, I wonder what else will the organization do with the data they get access to via this service? Are there conditions put on Alphabet to make sure this doesn't double as taking advantage of the needy?

  16. "acually launched from Puerto Rico by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

    Thas fanastic.

  17. Whats the use if phones are dead.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In a typical emergency, power will not be restored for atleast a week. During that time phone batteries will die out. We need technology to keep phone alive during that golden (rather critical) period to save lives, contact people, help supply management by/for victims of diaster on large scale. What good is the innovation in latest pixel or powerbank.

  18. This project failed in Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While not a bad idea, fact is this project failed miserably when it was tested in Brazil.

    So Google is just looking for a workaround regulations to try it again.

  19. The balloons will drift away. by cosmicl · · Score: 1

    The plan as described appears to assume the balloons will stay in nearly same lat and long once launched or at least with in line of sight of PR. To find out of this is true or not for Puerto Rico, have a look at earth.net.org specifically over PR at 70 mbar pressure which corresponds roughly to the proposed height of these balloons. https://earth.nullschool.net/#... In fact the wind speed at that height is about 20 km/hr. So in 24 hours the balloons will travel about 500 km which is beyond line of site from where they were the day before. Also PR is about 50 x 150 km. The only way to impose some choice about where the balloon goes is by changing the amount of gas in the envelope to cause the balloon to rise or fall to altitudes where the wind velocity is different. Using earth.nullschool.net to see the winds velocities over PR for different heights, this approach doesn't look promising.

  20. And Those Pesky Cables? by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    Each balloon will, one presumes, be anchored and communicated with by a long cable, right?

    What's to keep all those military and news helicopters and aircraft from running into the cables? They can be quite hard to see, don't you know?

    Big orange balls anchored every 50 feet vertically? Good luck with that.