Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Employees Can Now Work In Treehouses (cnbc.com)

Microsoft's campus now features three outdoor treehouses for its employees. An anonymous reader quotes CNBC: More than 12 feet off the ground, the treehouses feature charred-wood walls, skylights, at least one gas fireplace, Wi-Fi and hidden electrical outlets. Employees can even grab a bite at an outdoor extension of the indoor cafeteria. The "more Hobbit than HQ" treehouses are designed by Pete Nelson of the TV show "Treehouse Masters" and are part of Microsoft's growing "outdoor districts..." The company touts the professional benefits of working in nature -- greater creativity, focus and happiness -- but honestly, the treehouses are just plain cool.
Microsoft touts a Harvard physician who believes nature "stimulates reward neurons in your brain. It turns off the stress response, which means you have lower cortisol levels, lower heart rate and blood pressure, and improved immune response." There's a short video on the "Working at Microsoft" channel on YouTube, but I'm curious what Slashdot readers think about working outdoors. Or, in a tree...

95 comments

  1. Windows is a non-standard abomination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Working in trees will not help that.

    1. Re:Windows is a non-standard abomination by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      It depends ... is "more than 12 feet off the ground" high enough for them to hang themselves?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:Windows is a non-standard abomination by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      50% of all falls from 13 feet are fatal

    3. Re: Windows is a non-standard abomination by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      100% of the claims you made in your post are false, also known in this case as false hope.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    4. Re: Windows is a non-standard abomination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ten loops instead of thirteen...

  2. How Soon Before by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    How soon before someone gets fired for mentioning "getting wood"? Or just plain ol' hijinks in the back of the "wood shed"?

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    1. Re:How Soon Before by TWX · · Score: 1

      I expect hijinks more than puns or even sexual harassment. I wouldn't be surprised if the amount of such harassment remains essentially unchanged from what it is now, but the introduction of the new setting may make for employees that are already inclined to get frisky with each other happy to try a new venue for their passions besides the supply closet etc.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:How Soon Before by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that putting all those poor H1B workers into trees is bound to be considered racist by somebody.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:How Soon Before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watching trees has a scientifically proven ability to lower stress levels in humans. Getting wood is clearly the same thing, for any reasonable human. :)

  3. Infantilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I find this trend of treating workers in technology like babies insulting and wasteful. I am not interested in beer in the workplace, I am not interested in replacing staircases with slides, or with play spaces. I'd much rather have a quiet, private office where I can work without getting bothered constantly by people who don't understand what I'm doing. And competent coworkers, while I'm dreaming.

    1. Re:Infantilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My initial reaction is agreement, though I fail to see how giving workers beer is treating them like babies.

    2. Re:Infantilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. A well known networking company (not the food services company by a homophonymous name) has a tree house *inside* one of its buildings in North Carolina. Trying to attract snowflakes. But we all know, snowflakes melt under heat and then evaporate. Leaving a barely discernible deposit someone else has to clean up.

    3. Re: Infantilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your talking about Cisco ain't ya? Just say it ;)

    4. Re: Infantilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're ***

      Fucking auto correct.

    5. Re: Infantilization by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

      That was my reaction as well. Young adults are already taking far longer to mature due to a culture that seems to encourage (and even praise) immaturity, businesses really shouldn't be helping. Do you really want to hire someone who is only willing to work for you because you have a 'cool treehouse'? Are we all 12 now? How could you ever trust a decision made by someone who is emotionally still a child?

    6. Re: Infantilization by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I was thinking ARA Services, but couldn't think of the tech company to match.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    7. Re: Infantilization by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Since we clearly _cannot_ trust any decision made at MS (just look what they are doing with Win10, with really bad ideas like spying on users, forced updates and an UI that changes its design), I don't see how this thing will make things worse.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:Infantilization by TWX · · Score: 2

      While I can appreciate an employer that attempts to provide means for employees to get meaningful breaks if their shifts are going to be long and arduous, I more appreciate employers that don't compel their employees to work far over a standard 40 hour workweek.

      Admittedly my perspectives on labor tend to fall toward the employee-protection side, but unless one is involved in the corporate-level decisions of a company I don't think that one should be salaried-exempt. As far as I'm concerned, end-workers that don't manage anyone else and middle-managers that are provided directives to the enforce upon their teams without really providing executive-level steering of the company should be paid overtime when they cross 40 hours. The whole point of being salaried-exempt originally was for those who ran companies and had a strong financial stake in those companies, rather than being workers paid for their production output. The modern white-collar job and other office-based jobs can muddy the distinction a bit, but it's pretty easy to identify when a supervisor or director sets policy, versus merely enforces or interprets policy set by someone above them, to the best of their abilities. To make an analogy to the world of education, in such a system teachers and department-heads that also teach would not be salaried-exempt. Those with "Superintendent" in their title would be salaried-exempt. Principals are the only place it gets muddy, but generally they are there to interpret and enforce policy, so they too would probably not be salaried-exempt, though that may depend on how much autonomy and authority they have over the campus, and how they have to answer to those above them.

      Anyway, back to the tech-employee, if an employee is not expected to regularly and consistently work more than 40 hours a week, then these diversionary tactics are not generally needed, because the employee can generally concentrate and make efforts for four hours at a stretch with a brief lunch after the first chunk of the day. It's only when the employee essentially lives there, has essentially moved-in for the vast majority of their waking-hours, that it becomes necessary to provide the comforts or home or other diversions to allow them to thrive without going crazy. And when one considers the amount of time wasted in these diversions (think of the Startup-stereotypical ping-pong or fooseball table) it's pretty likely that the employer isn't getting a whole lot more than those 40 hours per week in productivity anyway.

      To look at my own experience, what would benefit me the most is if my employer would reduce the number of lines of communication (landline, cell phone, e-mail, SMS, spark, jabber are simply too many and simply monitoring for incoming communications requires too much attention, pick two or three at most), would set specific time blocks for meetings so that employees are not unnecessarily disrupted in workflow and so bosses are available for consult, and would create a policy on when it is and when it is not acceptable to interrupt someone while they're working I would find my productivity increased without having to work any more hours. When I get interrupted it takes me some time to get back on-track again. Being interrupted for something important is one thing, but being interrupted for trivial things or for things that others should already know how to do are other matters entirely.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    9. Re:Infantilization by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1, Informative

      I agree...Our medium IT services and software provider just got the Google open office religion. So far our satellite office has been spared, but other offices around the world are being transformed into a hideous white, orange, blue and green preschool workspace. The ostensible goal is to attract Millenials, but IMO it alienates people who don't want to be treated like preschoolers.

      For those who weren't paying attention back then (or born, ye gods..) the late 90s had a very similar ramp up during the first dotcom bubble. Every workplace was trying to copy perk after perk of the startup down the street. It's where we got the foosball table, free meals, free concierge services, etc. trends we see at the Googles and Microsofts of the world today. I think the idea is that you need to have all these crazy perks to attract brilliant creative people...but I don't get it. Yes, I don't want to work in a soulless gray cubicle, but I don't want to sit at a cafeteria table with 10 of my coworker buddies listening to conversations, or get shot with Nerf guns, etc. It really is a culture shift if they can't attract employees with good salaries and interesting work - and have to resort to toys and brightly colored workspaces.

    10. Re: Infantilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't Japan go through this a while back as a result of the lost decade?

    11. Re: Infantilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if people didn't constantly say "grow up" when someone is trying to have fun they wouldn't be so terrified of the proposition.

    12. Re: Infantilization by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're talking about Cisco ain't ya? Just say it ;)

      No, definitely not Cisco/SysCo. I'm fairly certain the GP was talking about NetGear and NetGeer, a company founded by a guy named Sir Thomas Geer to distribute low-cost hairnets to school cafeterias across the country.

      [Quickly creates the Wikipedia entry... annnnnd done!]

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    13. Re:Infantilization by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 1

      I get where you are coming from, and agree for the most part, but to me this is quite different. I've always thought it would be nice to have a patio/balcony at different places I've worked at where I could go outside and work for a bit. Just for a break from the office. And now with laptops and wireless networks this is even easier to manage. Unfortunately you can't always add those to existing buildings, depending on the layout. So Microsoft has found a nice, creative way to add some outdoor work spaces for their employees.

      Also keep in mind that Microsoft, unlike most tech companies, understands that developers shouldn't be in open floor plans and gives them offices. At least the last I heard about them they did. Maybe some people share an office, but that's not too bad. Plus they give good benefits, 100% insurance coverage, and other perks. So it's not like they are wasting money on making "cool" and "fun" workplaces and not spending it on things that actually matter to employees.

    14. Re:Infantilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or is "acting adult" just an arbitrary construct...

    15. Re:Infantilization by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I agree. I was happiest/most productive when locked in a dark basement (for JPL). Zero distractions, no internet. What's a foseball? Never mind, I really don't care.

    16. Re: Infantilization by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      How could you ever trust a decision made by someone who is emotionally still a child?

      I would elect them President. I want to spread the buttfuckover butter on a much bigger piece of toast.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    17. Re:Infantilization by grumling · · Score: 1

      Summary: Salary is for suckers.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    18. Re: Infantilization by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It may be that fresh air and a pleasant setting makes people more productive.

      Especially during the two months of sun in the summer!

      And in the 10 months of rainy season, it will give the locals a place to work for a few minutes away from all the Californians.

    19. Re:Infantilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree...Our medium IT services and software provider just got the Google open office religion.

      I hate this open office crap. It is harder to concentrate. Everyone just ends up with headphones on. Here is how I would do it. Make long rectangular rooms with many doors at normal office spacing. Let people put in meaningful solid dividers that block sound. If people need to work in a more collaborative environment for a project, move them to an area without the dividers or take the dividers out. Network and power can be in the exterior wall with the doors, or in the floor under covers.

      Of course, while I'm at it, giving people a 4k TV wouldn't hurt. It doesn't need to display regular channels. You could have options such as what is outside, what is outside other campuses, important accomplishments of the company, etc, etc. You could even connect to them to give demonstrations to your colleagues. Of course people should have the off button. (I realize actually getting a window is unlikely, but important people could have the window offices as usual.)

    20. Re:Infantilization by TWX · · Score: 1

      Yes, but with the caveat that exceedingly few high-paying jobs are hourly, so unless you're a master machinist prototyping aerospace parts on a mill and lathe you'll probably have to have a salary job in order to make a lot of money.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    21. Re:Infantilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: "I would hate this, so everyone else needs to hate it too."

      Speaking of "infantile"....

  4. Yeah, Man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    # != # || whatever.

  5. Wonderful by thereitis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd absolutely love to work outside in a tree house (weather and insects permitting). I'd also like to try working from a house boat. While the health benefits of nature aren't exactly a "new" discovery, I'm happy to see Microsoft recognizing it by giving their employees this opportunity. I hope this experiment works out well.

    1. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. Sure beats Apples shiny new campus/UFO/open-plan-monstrosity/whatever they’re calling it!

  6. Can I both hate this and want to work in one? by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Part of me thinks this is gimmicky and stupid.

    The rest of me wants to work in one, or look into converting my home office into a tree house, complete with a rope ladder and a secret password.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Can I both hate this and want to work in one? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Part of me thinks this is gimmicky and stupid.

      The rest of me wants to work in one, or look into converting my home office into a tree house, complete with a rope ladder and a secret password.

      And a big "No Homers" sign on the front.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    2. Re:Can I both hate this and want to work in one? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Who would not want to work for an employer who wants to psychologically manipulate you to be more productive and less demanding, yep, you betcha. A tree might be pretty thick to be considered the thin end of a wooden wedge but where will the manipulation stop. So they are looking at connecting the brain direct, well, I know M$ and I fully understand what you can do to people with direct brain stimulation and well, I would be suspect about anything they do. What more productive people, stop manipulating them, consensus is, reducing worktimes and working loads will hugely improve productivity, so how about a 6 hour day, two three hour shifts with a one hour break. Don't be cunts and you wont need to manipulate workers to achieve productivity (share the work around).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  7. I wonder if the editor knows what tout means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :point-up:

  8. Building 7? by spongman · · Score: 1

    Someone make a sign.

    1. Re:Building 7? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Someone make a sign.

      Given the mentality we're talking about here, it would probably read NO GIRLS ALOUD.

  9. It's good that MS is trying to be cool again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if the treehouses will end up as a fad, they are trying to change their mindset.

    1. Re:It's good that MS is trying to be cool again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like a good deal for the contractors i hope they fleeced them.

  10. who works for them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they children or childish or have not grown up?

  11. Monkey Boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would have loved it :-)

  12. Perfect for code monkeys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need bananas now.

  13. "Hey, we're having problems getting folks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hey, we're having problems getting folks to work for us - we interview folks, and they listen, but then always seem to take jobs with other companies. Aren't we cool anymore?"

    "Well, we could offer better salaries, more influence over project development, or maybe offer a more sane work-life balance..."

    "Tree Houses! That's it! Tree houses - those are just - well, they're just cool, aren't they? Yes siree- tree houses! That'll get all the cool kids!"

    1. Re: "Hey, we're having problems getting folks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Friend of mine still working for MS (I've been gone for over a decade) told me that he was part of a recruiting effort a few months back and that the HR people were uncharacteristically frank. They let him know that when they compete with Google or Facebook for a candidate, 9 times out of ten they lose.

    2. Re:"Hey, we're having problems getting folks" by craXORjack · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. I don't think it's a bad thing though. It's a creative solution to their recruiting doldrums. It stimulates the reward neurons in a candidates brain.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  14. MS is back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will definitely bring MS back to relevance.

  15. They've Gone APESHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But this is the Trumpverse isn't it. The new normal. Mad as hatters.

  16. SUCK MY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ballmer is out now, and Microsoft has "turned around".
     
    But this? Is there *actually* hope for Microsoft in the long run when they do things like this? Real devs should be able to work in refrigerator sized cardboard boxes in a parking lot and work under the duress of having a pitchfork shoved through the walls if the keyboard is idle for more than 30 seconds. At least that's what my boss told me.

  17. Possibly for Zoning or Tax Reasons by Scarletdown · · Score: 2

    My initial reaction is that this is simply to skirt around zoning ordinances and property taxes.

    It reminds me of a really neat property outside of town we were drooling at before moving back here a few years ago. The place had a very awesome looking "elevated" guest house about the same distance off the ground a tree house would have been, and it was declared a tree house instead of a guest house to keep the tax bill down from what we could determine.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  18. Some company is desperate to appear "cool"... by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Good. That means the stream of willing morons working for MS may be drying up. In actual reality MS has never been cool, but there are far too many people that mistake having a lot of money as a really positive quality.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Some company is desperate to appear "cool"... by Scutter · · Score: 1

      I know it's poplar to hate on Microsoft, but fir crying out loud you could maybe leaf off just a little bit. It's getting really boring listening to people whine about them.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    2. Re:Some company is desperate to appear "cool"... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are people who pine to work at Microsoft.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Some company is desperate to appear "cool"... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      But, Microsoft remains a lumbering company, even if it is evergreen.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    4. Re:Some company is desperate to appear "cool"... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You are not required to listen. If you do, what you get is your own fault, stop whining about it.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Some company is desperate to appear "cool"... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I don't think you've twigged what's going on here.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Some company is desperate to appear "cool"... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You analysis is elmentary, but I'm oak A with that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Some company is desperate to appear "cool"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, he’s just trying to sap the fun out of it.

  19. Linked video does not show people working... by ffkom · · Score: 1

    ... but rather walking around on a sight-seeing tour through the "tree house".

    Once they actually work, they will need to look at a screen, where they would see the same awful MicroSoft crap-ware as in so many conventional offices.

    I'd prefer working in a soul-less cube of concrete, if in return on my screen there was a decent operating system.

    1. Re:Linked video does not show people working... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who leaves the shades closed (to reduce glare on my screens) in my window office at Microsoft, I have to agree. I'm much rather use a decent OS than work in a treehouse.

      Also, if the people in the video are real Microsoft employees from some team (I doubt it), it's likely one of the design teams. They tend to be a lot more diverse than the engineering teams (none of which resemble the impressive diversity in the video), and also more into that kind of thing.

    2. Re:Linked video does not show people working... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tend to be a lot more diverse than the engineering teams (none of which resemble the impressive diversity in the video), and also more into that kind of thing.

      "Hey madar chod, fuck this treehouse, we're going for mango lassis, you in?"

  20. Tech Bubble 2.0 or new world of work? by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google, Microsoft and others are famously "all-inclusive" workplaces designed to continue the college campus atmosphere. The question is whether treehouse work spaces are just a by-product of the tech bubble and trying to attract people with interesting personalities, or whether Millenials really prefer working in these conditions.

    Microsoft is famous for giving its developers very nice office space and very little reason to leave campus. If I were a 20-something computer science grad, this might have some appeal to me. I probably wouldn't have much of a life outside of work, my apartment would be small and lack all the amenities of "campus life," etc. Problem is, once those 20-somethings reach their 30s or so, a fraction of them are going to have families and lives outside of work.

    The only problem is what to do with the grown-ups who don't want to work 100 hour weeks anymore. If Microsoft is simply saying they're not welcome, then they will run into maturity issues down the line once every large MS-focused corporate workload is running in Azure. Maybe they're banking on keeping the fraction of 30+ workers who will continue working crazy hours. When you think about it it makes sense...app development and infrastructure is so abstracted now that all of he truly geeky CS people are going to gravitate towards the OS and cloud providers to keep all the real hardware and software living under all those layers and wrappers going. Everyone else is going to be a "developer" gluing JavaScript libraries together.

    1. Re:Tech Bubble 2.0 or new world of work? by swillden · · Score: 2

      The only problem is what to do with the grown-ups who don't want to work 100 hour weeks anymore.

      Do you have any evidence that people at Microsoft do work 100-hour weeks? I see this assumption on slashdot a lot, often applied to my employer (Google) where I know it isn't true. I suspect that it's also not true at Microsoft (hmm, I know a couple of people who used to be at MS; I'll ask them next time we chat).

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Tech Bubble 2.0 or new world of work? by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      Google, Microsoft and others are famously "all-inclusive" workplaces designed to continue the college campus atmosphere.

      Ever since I was on campus (in undergrad) I've steered clear of companies who touted "the campus atmosphere" - because "it's like a campus" means you never leave. I remember ATI recruiting when I was in 4th year. "You know, it's like a campus, we have restaurants, we have a gym, we even have like bedrooms with comfy beds where you can rest..." - ah, wait a second, you want me to sleep there? Goodbye. (ATI, now AMD, no longer has the building with the gym, or so I hear. They had to sell it.)

    3. Re: Tech Bubble 2.0 or new world of work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody has worked those kind of hours at MS since the late 90's. It happened before because with the geometric rise of the stock price people knew they'd get out of there in a few years with a big bag of cash. That made it worth it. After the dotcom crash it changed. Then Ballmer became CEO. Mostly "C people" were hired. By the mid 2000s the parking lots weren't filling up until 10 AM and congestion on route 520 (the freeway that cuts right through campus) would start at 4 PM.

      I don't know what it's like now but I doubt the days of crazy hours are back. About 2 years ago I was visiting the area and got on Yik Yak. Some dude was saying his boss was OOO and he was thinking of leaving work to go see a movie. I asked him if he worked for MS. He did. Anecdotal no doubt but I think that's still very much the attitude in Redmond.

    4. Re:Tech Bubble 2.0 or new world of work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's the culture over there after all the ranking systems they've been grinding through over the years?

      Bet it takes more than a treehouse and a few years to change that.

      Why even bother when you'd rather run Linux?

    5. Re:Tech Bubble 2.0 or new world of work? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      As a 20-something engineering grad, I was far more interested in the project that I was working on (a Mars lander for example), than where I was working. Actually, I didn't care in the slightest what the conditions were, even the time the building flooded and everyone kept working until the water shorted out the network and they went everyone home. Everyone just joked about it for a minute and continued to work until that time. IIRC, they had to send boats around the some of the offices because the water out the doors was up past people's knees.

    6. Re:Tech Bubble 2.0 or new world of work? by gravewax · · Score: 2

      millennials? fuck them, I want to work in a treehouse.

    7. Re:Tech Bubble 2.0 or new world of work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ex employee : It is a bit of a myth that has lingered from the days when Microsoft had Death Marchs when approaching a major release. It hasn't been that way their for nearly 20 years.

  21. handicap accessible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That work area didn't look like it could be fully accessible to people with disabilities. I wonder if runs afoul of the Americans with Disabilities Act?

  22. Better pay and offices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay people better and give them offices. With windows not the OS. Letâ(TM)s be adults and not pine for childish toys at work.

  23. 40.000 people in a tree-house? by GNious · · Score: 1

    (No, didn't RTFA)
    Google says there's 30k-40k employees at MS' Redmond HQ - how many of them gets to even see this thing?

  24. Will they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft employees _can_ work in a variety of environments by they rarely do.

    Back in the Ballmer years the parking lots rarely filled up before 10 and started emptying at 4. Add an extra long lunch and the fact that most people's days are filled with meetings and almost nothing got done.

  25. Now when they need to branch code... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they can do it literally.

  26. Effects nullified by usage of stressful OS by skaag · · Score: 1

    Aren't the relaxing effects of the tree house completely nullified by using a stressful OS such as Windows?!

    --

    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... time... to... die...

  27. I hope they've planned for tree growth by ortholattice · · Score: 1

    The treehouse my son and his friends built 15 years ago turned into a twisted mass of splintered wood. (We took it down last year as requested by our insurance co.)

    1. Re:I hope they've planned for tree growth by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      That feature will come with Treehouse for Workgroups 3.11.

  28. Balconies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For many years I worked in an IBM building that had a nice balcony, but the doors to access it were locked in 1993 ... when Gerstner started parting the company middle management suddenly had reason to fear the balcony being put to other purpose.

  29. We can't get enough chairs or desks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but we're doing this crap? Two new guys we onboarded Sept 1 are still sitting on the floor in a hallway. Also, since I'm above a certain weight, when I started here in Feb, I wasn't allowed to sit in any of the desk chairs. I had to wait three weeks for one of the "fat chairs."

    1. Re: We can't get enough chairs or desks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they sitting on the floor because you broke all the normal-people chairs on the floor by sitting in them before they arrived?

  30. SuperHyperMinimilism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was done in the 90s by The Upright Citizens Brigade. Google, er Bing it!

  31. meanwhile low class people do without computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks to the MS monopoly

  32. Meanwhile at the Apple Spaceship... by grumling · · Score: 1

    Memo to: All HQ employees
    From: tcook@apple.com
    Subject: Food and Drink Policy

    Just reminding everyone that there's no food or drink permitted outside the cafeteria and designated break areas. In the past week we've had over 50 coffee spills on the (Apple white) carpet. Also remember that fingerprints detract from the beautiful views from our custom windows and it is very time consuming for the cleaning staff to remove them. And remember to use the shoe covers provided at all entrances during inclement weather.

    Also, remember that the pet policy is in full effect -many of you have heard about the "incident" outside Jony's office and that is unacceptable in my opinion no matter who's dog it was. So going forward no pets, no exceptions.

    Together we can all do our part to keep the HQ in good shape for years to come.

    thanks.
    Tim.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  33. All well and good by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    if you can even get a job at Microsoft. These days it seems you have to live in India or be an H1-B visa to get anywhere ....

  34. But the problem is density. by shess · · Score: 1

    At Google, for awhile I was very near a common area we called "the wine cave", because one section was decorated with the ends of wine barrels. Initially, it was a nice place to go chill out for a bit in the middle of the day. Over time, though, as employee density kept being ratcheted up, it became a campground for visitors and for locals who were trying to get some time away from their neighbors. So eventually it became overcrowded during the bulk of the workday, completely negating any value it previously added.

    I can completely see why a workplace would not optimize to make your workspace so perfect that you never wanted to leave it. That's probably too far past the point of high-cost-low-returns. But if people's working space sucks to the point where alternative venues become a requirement, you are doing it wrong, and it's unlikely that an employer like that would then turn around and provide enough alternative spaces to meet the actual need.

  35. I'd do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Trump-voting, gun-owning, liberal-bashing guy who lives in Tennessee and works as an IT administrator. My first instinct is to make fun of snowflakes who need this in order to function at work, but after a few seconds of thinking about it, I'd love to spend my day at work in a fucking treehouse.

    1. Re: I'd do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not nearly in the same league as the guys working at Microsoft (not to mention the better guys working for Google, Facebook, and so on)

      Stop dreaming and go back to administering... until we finish perfecting the software that will replace you.

  36. If you can't build a safe system, by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    build a fun environment. I guess they're stealing Google tactics now too. If people realized that most modern roller coaster parks ran Windows, they'd be a whole lot more scared.

  37. Most appropriate by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    After all, you would have to subhuman to want to work for MS.

  38. lots of people live in treehouses by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    wood is made out of trees, think about it, ill give you all the time you need

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  39. You could work in academia by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    where your office is on a hallway with tiled walls and linoleum floors, and where the sounds of slamming doors from classrooms, offices occupied by multiple grad students and a conference room with a particularly balky door SLAM, SLAM, SLAM seep over the transom through the false ceiling for the A/C retrofit.

    Classroom instructors insist on closing their doors -- actually, I would prefer to hear the ah-ums of the disfluent instructor teaching multiple sections of a required technical writing course or the stentorian voice of the guy teaching 20 bored grad students clumsy separation-of-variables methods to describe plasma waves under unrealistically simplified geometries to the SLAM, SLAM of students leaving and reentering those classrooms during a 50 minute class period to take bathroom breaks. And then when class lets out, there is a burst of SLAM, SLAM, SLAM, SLAM because pushing the door against the damper to activate the feature to hold the door open is beyond the skill level of Engineering undergraduate students.

    Working evenings or weekends is not any better because students claim the classrooms for their study groups by closing the doors, and of course one member of the group has to leave for a bathroom or snack break every 10 minutes, multiplied by the number of classroom on that hallway - SLAM, SLAM.

    Every once-in-a-while someone from Facilities comes to adjust the ancient door closers to make the slam phase less energetic and to lube the ancient door knobs and bolts to quiet them, but I guess they go out of adjustment. The door nearest me has had a closer replaced with a modern version with adjustment instructions on the Web, but it requires a special sized Allen wrench that I don't yet have; the ancient closers the size of fire hydrants are a complete mystery as there are no adjustment instructions on the Internet, and there is a sense that if one "went at" one, a screw would come loose and a puddle of door-closer oil would form on the linoleum.

    I would welcome a tree house, a dark, windowless (and quiet!) basement, anything over this.

  40. diff'rent strokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    During warm weather from April through mid-October (sigh) my favorite place to work is on my front porch, where I'm surrounded by trees, birds, squirrels, and (for part of the summer) fireflies. I've also gone on retreats where I stayed in a remote cabin up north for a week, and got some really good work done there. It isn't for everyone, but neither is being locked in a dark room with no windows.

  41. Can it help Microsoft become less user-hostile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be nice. All Microsoft products spy on you forcibly in staggering ways. The Windows 10 UI is idiotic and NOT intuitive at all.

    I hope the tree houses help reverse stupidity and evilness that has been built in to Microsoft products.