Slashdot Mirror


Munich Plans New Vote on Dumping Linux For Windows 10 (techrepublic.com)

An anonymous reader quotes TechRepublic: The city of Munich has suggested it will cost too much to carry on using Linux alongside Windows, despite having spent millions of euros switching PCs to open-source software... "Today, with a Linux client-centric environment, we are often confronted with major difficulties and additional costs when it comes to acquiring and operating professional application software," the city council told the German Federation of Taxpayers. Running Linux will ultimately prove unsustainable, suggests the council, due to the need to also keep a minority of Windows machines to run line-of-business software incompatible with Linux. "In the long term, this situation means that the operation of the non-uniform client landscape can no longer be made cost-efficient"... Since completing the multi-year move to LiMux, a custom-version of the Linux-based OS Ubuntu, the city always kept a smaller number of Windows machines to run incompatible software. As of last year it had about 4,163 Windows-based PCs, compared to about 20,000 Linux-based PCs.

The assessment is at odds with a wide-ranging review of the city's IT systems by Accenture last year, which found that most of the problems stem not from the use of open-source software, but from inefficiencies in how Munich co-ordinates the efforts of IT teams scattered throughout different departments. Dr. Florian Roth, leader of the Green Party at Munich City Council, said the review had also not recommended a wholesale shift to Windows. "The Accenture report suggested to run both systems because the complete 'rollback' to Windows and MS Office would mean a waste of experience, technology, work and money," he said... The city's administration is investigating how long it would take and how much it would cost to build a Windows 10 client for use by the city's employees. Once this work is complete, the council will vote again in November on whether this Windows client should replace LiMux across the authority from 2021.

A taxpayer's federation post urged "Penguin, adieu!" -- while also admitting that returning to Windows "will devour further tax money in the millions," according to TechRepublic.

"The federation's post also makes no mention of the licensing and other savings achieved by switching to LiMux, estimated to stand at about €10m."

27 of 412 comments (clear)

  1. Cheaper to license, costlier to support by orin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft put together a huge infrastructure in MS Learning to teach people to use and support their software. This meant that while you had to pay more to license their software, it was relatively easy to find people that could use and support their software. Because it's more challenging to "grow" people who can support open source software, their services have never come cheap. The most expensive part of any IT deployment is the geeks - reduce the cost of that (by prioritizing the creation of training material) and the cost of licensing your software really becomes a secondary concern.

    1. Re:Cheaper to license, costlier to support by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are many Microsoft "engineers" simply due to Windows being easier to use, but many of those people couldn't script themselves out of a paper-bag.
      When Windows decides to break (which is all too often), the most common fix is to reboot the server or restart the service.
      Windows Server is a black box which nobody really understands... but people manage to live with it somehow, and "trick" it into working.

      This is unlike Linux engineers who can generally fix problems due to source code or good scripting skills. ...but mostly what tips people over to Windows are the apps that businesses need to use. They're just not available on Linux.

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    2. Re:Cheaper to license, costlier to support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I work with both Windows (various versions) and Linux on a daily basis. As a long time user of Linux and a former UNIX (Solaris, HP-UX and AIX) sysadmin, I don't like to say this but the reality is that Windows is far more stable and reliable than Linux these days.

      Despite dealing with far more Windows systems than Linux systems, I haven't had to deal with a Windows booting problem in ages. On the other hand, I've had to deal with numerous incidents where Linux systems wouldn't boot properly due to various problems with systemd. Some of these problems have been truly idiotic.

      It's not 1995 any longer. Recent versions of Windows have been remarkably stable.

      It's also not 2005 any longer. Recent versions of Linux have been disturbingly unstable.

      While Windows has gotten better than it was in the past, I'm sad to say that Linux has gotten worse than it was in the past. Linux used to be all about stability and reliability and robustness. Now Linux is all about frivolous changes and software like systemd, GNOME 3 and PulseAudio that I've found to be crap.

    3. Re:Cheaper to license, costlier to support by lucm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did I just found a wormhole on Slashdot?

      Nope, just a wordy systemd troll.

      you mean, a person who has to actually deal with systemd in real life, and not just on their Ubuntu dual-boot desktop?

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    4. Re:Cheaper to license, costlier to support by someone1234 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nope, there are more microsoft engineers - and users, because microsoft paid universities to teach only windows (they gave free windows, free office, etc). At least, this is what happened here.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    5. Re:Cheaper to license, costlier to support by e432776 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A lot of what you write resonates with me. I'll add another variable that I don't see mentioned yet: Linux support of notebook computers. Its another layer of problems (power management, nvidia optimus, even wifi drivers) that really put me over the edge. Many of the 'client' machines out there in 2017 are laptops, and poor support on those makes things difficult beyond the "interoperability" issues.

      Things are clearly constantly changing, including my own ability to keep up (generally decreasing over time). Makes it hard to get a handle on comparisons between MS Windows, Linux; but my view is that when I started using Linux in 2001 it was clearly superior to the Microsoft offering. By the time I moved off of Linux for as a primary client computing platform (2015) it was much less clear. Today, as I have dabbled around, the tables seem to have turned, at least on notebooks. I'd be interested to read what others think on this aspect.

    6. Re:Cheaper to license, costlier to support by fisted · · Score: 5, Informative

      for the vast majority of systems administration work a GUI is superior.

      Indeed, and it automates so well. Right?

  2. Linux has no Office, Exchange, Sharepoint killer by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As much as I am a vocal Linux supporter, the fact of the matter is that Linux has no comparable turnkey Office, Exchange, and Sharepoint killer.

    Oh yes, there are comparable applications - but none of them work together in an easily managed way.

    Until something unified and stable can actually compete with the ease of setup of Microsoft's office suite, Linux has no hope here.

    So it looks like we'll be stuck with Windows Server and it's regular RDS server dropouts, printer spooler issues, DFS shares disappearing, and random Windows hangs for a long time into the forseeable future until someone can do something about it.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  3. It doesn't help that modern Linux is a shitshow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    It can't help that modern Linux distros have become such a shitshow. By that I mean the Linux and open source software ecosystem undergoes totally unnecessary change very rapidly. Often this has made the user experience worse, and it makes it harder to use and support Linux.

    Some good examples of this are GNOME 3, systemd, PulseAudio, NetworkManager, and Firefox. They are examples of change for the sake of change alone.

    Debian is a good example of what happens at the distro level. For much of its existence it was a stable OS, even if somewhat slow-moving at times. What you learned today could often be applied next year, if not several years after that. When there was change, it was done gradually and in a way that avoided disruption.

    But Debian has taken a turn for the worst over the last several years, with things like systemd and GNOME 3 disruptively forced into the distro very rapidly, and even against the wishes of the Debian user community. Problems with such software have effectively ruined Debian for many users, especially long-time Debian users who came to expect a very high level of stability and reliability.

    While some people claim that moving to a niche distro like Devuan, or Slackware, or Gentoo is an option, the reality is that such distros don't really provide a better experience. It's much more effective to move to an OS like FreeBSD, where its developers and maintainers have shown that they won't make radically disruptive changes on a frequent basis.

    I can't blame organizations from moving away from Linux today. Modern Linux distros are nothing like typical Linux distros were a decade ago. Stability and sensible change have been thrown out in favor of hipster-oriented fads involving radical and disruptive change without much, if any, benefit.

  4. Translation by Shompol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Translating from German: "The right people have been greased, this will not happen again"

  5. Re:It doesn't help that modern Linux is a shitshow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Linux and open source software ecosystem undergoes totally unnecessary change very rapidly. Often this has made the user experience worse, and it makes it harder to use and support Linux.

    This is so spot on. There are some parts of Windows, especially on the server side e.g. the Service Control Manager or the RRAS admin console that look EXACTLY the same as they did in 1999. Why you ask? BECAUSE THEY DON'T NEED TO FUCKING CHANGE. They are "done" and the only changes are to fix bugs.

    If this was Linux these dialogs would have changed 6 times by now, because OSS developers prefer to fuck with things to feed their creative brains rather than focusing their energy on fixing bugs. Why? Well you can consider OSS developers are not being paid and in many cases are volunteers. You can't criticize or fire them since they're doing it for free. New design is more fun than fixing bugs which everyone will agree is boring. QED. So what you have is a constant influx of new features / requirements creep and moving shit around in the UI for no good reason while legit bugs never get fixed. The best example of this is Firefox and we all know why.

    In commercial (proprietary) software you're typically working to a list of requirements and churning through them. Going off and doing whatever you feel like? You're fired. There's a lot of guys in Bangalore right now working for Intel, MS, IBM, etc doing boring as fuck work fixing bugs and software maintenance. It's a job, it pays the bills, they go home after 40 hrs but bugs get fixed.

    In the OSS world this model is completely inappropriate to their development philosophy. It's apples to oranges.

    Now if you'll excuse me I need to restart Firefox because of the fucking memory leaks.

  6. Re:It doesn't help that modern Linux is a shitshow by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So Linux adds some dumb audio drivers, whereas Windows changes it's entire UI that makes even GNOME 3 look good. So you say, that Metro UI is for home users and not servers? Well, GNOME 3 and PulseAudio aren't for back office servers either. Your Red Hat server is going to run the same software from 10 years ago most likely, whereas Windows is bad at doing this.

    You will often hear the Windows guru say "have you tried shutting it off and turning it back on?" Yes, sounds like a joke but it happens. But you don't hear that from the Linux guru.

  7. Re:It doesn't help that modern Linux is a shitshow by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Windows 8, windows 10... suffering. Change not just for change sake but also with more instrumentation to spy on you, to advertise to you. Ultimate goal is that we pay a monthly fee AND we have to put up with commercials to use our own computer.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  8. MS Headquarter by prefec2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The MS headquarter is in Munich. The new mayor of Munich is a great fan of MS who always wanted to end LiMux. While the LiMux made some mistakes by not including employees in their process, the Accountability Office determined that the move back would be a waste of money and time. Anyway, Schleswig-Holstein, the most northern state of Germany, us going for OSS.

  9. Re:Savings in effeciency and in euros by lucm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We should always consider the TCO and not the sticker price.

    At the office we pay roughly $2,500 per hypervisor per year to run RHEL virtual machines, plus a ton of extras (they like to licenses useful things separately, a la Oracle). VMWare license not included, of course.

    Retail price for the Microsoft equivalent, Windows Server DataCenter, is a one-time $6,000 fee and that includes Hyper-V, which is nowadays more or less comparable to VMWare. And nobody in the enterprise world pays retail with Microsoft, there's always a huge discount for ELA.

    Bottom line, if you want support, Windows is less expensive than RHEL.

    I think Oracle Linux is slightly less expensive than RHEL but then you just get CentOS + Oracle drivers so it's not really the same product. Not sure about SLES but I doubt they're cheaper. Last time I checked Ubuntu was $1,500 / yr, but then who wants that in their data centers I wonder.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  10. Re:"Telemetry" by lucm · · Score: 4, Informative

    The next step would be a plan to migrate from the legacy Windows apps over to open source based alternatives.

    This is another case where what appears to be common sense doesn't survive contact with reality.

    You live in a fantasy if you seriously believe that there's open source alternatives to everything that runs on Windows. Either that, or you're thinking in terms of "checkbox alternative", such as saying that Gnucash is an alternative to Great Plains or Accpacc, discarding the shitload of missing features or the fact that there's complex integrations and a large ecosystem of plugins required to communicate with vendors, partners or other systems.

    Here's an example. Many big suppliers won't allow B2B automation unless orders are pushed via AS2 or EDI, and many requires a full-blown GDSN connection. This means that if the city wants to JIT their toilet paper orders instead of paying a fortune in warehousing, they must be able to have their accounting system approve and transmit orders. This requires specialized plugins in products like Sage or Dynamics. You won't find anything to fork on github to deal with that, and even if you were, it would be a terrible idea because the second the protocols or headers change in the B2B schema, you're fucked since dude420@github is not going to give you a clear roadmap in lockstep with what the big suppliers or vendors request.

    In an ideal world it would all be web-based and browser-neutral and maybe even SaaS, but given the level of customization required for a large organization, it's still a pipe dream.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  11. Re:It doesn't help that modern Linux is a shitshow by Shikaku · · Score: 4, Informative

    https://systemd-free.org/

    There's openRC if you really hate systemd that much. And I would just stick with XFCE and ALSA since that's all you need basically https://sourceforge.net/projec... here's a base installer if you think you have to install then remove systemd.

  12. Re:Savings in effeciency and in euros by lucm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Meh we've had endless discussions and none of the scenarios were really more cost-effective. There's too many packages and products licensed differently, we don't have just one type of workload.

    Anyways both the RHEL and MSFT licenses are peanuts compared to the obscene Oracle and IBM licenses. When we get SQL Server on RHEL I will personally fly to wherever the fuck Oracle have their headquarters to take a piss on their logo.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  13. Re:It doesn't help that modern Linux is a shitshow by dunkelfalke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Windows not likely to run a software from 10 years ago? Are you from some kind of a parallel universe? Windows backwards compatibility is legendary. Windows 10 is able to run most software written for Windows 95, but it is often very difficult to get a package from Debian Jessie running in Debian Stretch.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  14. Re:Linux has no Office, Exchange, Sharepoint kille by dunkelfalke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And this attitude - why would user even need x - is exactly why Linux on desktop will never happen.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  15. Re:It doesn't help that modern Linux is a shitshow by 3247 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Windows 10 (32 bit) runs Word for Windows 6.0, which was written for Windows 3.x.

    --
    Claus
  16. Re:It doesn't help that modern Linux is a shitshow by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And I forgot to mention the ribbon bar interface change where some functionality was completely lost for 6 months before I figured out how to do it again because it had been so well hidden.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  17. Re:The City Of Munich Knows What It... by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then they were also very smart people when they decided to switch to Linux.
    Or does that notion conflict with your bias?

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  18. Um...Windows 8? by bradley13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because Microsoft never inflicted Windows Vista and Windows 8 on the world. They didn't destroy a stable Office interface with the disaster known as the "Ribbon". Windows is totally stable, and immune to the whims of GUI designers looking to make their mark. /sarc

    Seriously, this is a disease that affects the entire software community. However, Linux gives you the tools to minimize the problems. Granted, you won't escape SystemD easily, but Gnome is actually easy: choose a more stable desktop, like xfce. I've been using Xubuntu for ages - any changes to the desktop have been minor. There are a few hiccups in getting things configured, but even those hiccups have been stable for a long time.

    I think the mistake that Munich has made is allowing such a large set of Windows computers to exist. This means that they are essentially maintaining two complete infrastructures, requiring two sets of administrators, support personnel who have to cover both worlds, etc.. They haven't ever finished their migration, and that is the real problem.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  19. Re:Very symptomatic by sad_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure Windows 10 won't need any retraining of any users.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  20. Re:Cue the Windows haters by Moritz+Moeller+-+Her · · Score: 4, Informative

    You are not correct:

    libreoffice is written in C++. There are some JAVA plugins, but they do not relate to the GUI. I find libreoffice quit snappy, but format conversion to word is lossy and some features (e.g. track changes) are not as mature as in MS word. MS Word on the other hand is a nightmare that everyone has gotten accustomed to.

    --
    Moritz
  21. Corruption, plain and simple. Stupid to go back... by bussdriver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1) MS has been attacking this from the start. Every Linux misstep is amplified and scrutinized with a double standard.
    2) Massive multinationals have more power than most governments and outlast political careers.
    3) Early adopters pay an additional price; even at a higher price, Open Source is a long term game. Commercial is a perpetual subscription to a 3rd party's short term game, on their terms.
    4) THE TREND IS TO THE CLOUD even MS is going that way! Internal services (indoor cloud?) also.
    5) When everything can run in the browser (and most government software should) it doesn't matter what OS you use. So why pay for the USA to copy all your data and raise your security threat?