Slashdot Mirror


Trump Says Broadcom Is Moving Headquarters To US From Singapore (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: President Donald Trump said semiconductor company Broadcom Ltd. is returning its headquarters to the U.S. from Singapore. Broadcom Chief Executive Officer Hock Tan joined Trump Thursday in the Oval Office for the announcement. Tan said the move to domicile the company in the U.S. would bring $20 billion in revenue into the country. The two men didn't specify the site of the new main location. Broadcom's website lists San Jose, California, as an existing corporate co-headquarters and has done so since the present company was created in 2016 in one of the semiconductor industry's largest acquisitions when Avago Technologies Ltd. acquired then-Broadcom Corp. The company's shares declined as much as 4 percent to $248.87 after the announcement. The stock had gained 47 percent this year through Wednesday's close.

122 comments

  1. "Trump said" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yeah, we should all know better by now.

    1. Re:"Trump said" by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "We will immediately repeal and replace Obamacare - and nobody can do that like me. We will save $'s and have much better healthcare! ~Candidate Donald Trump, Feb 9, 2016.

      --
      Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
    2. Re: "Trump said" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't have sex with her, cigar in pussy and bj isn't sex. No babies come out that way.

    3. Re: "Trump said" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I did try and fuck her. She was married. ...
      I moved on her like a bitch. But I couldnâ(TM)t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, sheâ(TM)s now got the big phony tits and everything. Sheâ(TM)s totally changed her look. ...
      Yeah, thatâ(TM)s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, Iâ(TM)m automatically attracted to beautiful â" I just start kissing them. Itâ(TM)s like a magnet. Just kiss. I donâ(TM)t even wait. And when youâ(TM)re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. ...
      Grab â(TM)em by the pussy. You can do anything."

    4. Re: "Trump said" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Despite the constant negative press covfefe,"

    5. Re:"Trump said" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^^^ The whataboutism is strong in this one.

    6. Re:"Trump said" by c · · Score: 0

      "We will immediately repeal and replace Obamacare - and nobody can do that like me. We will save $'s and have much better healthcare! ~Candidate Donald Trump, Feb 9, 2016.

      You have to admit that he was right about the first part; I don't believe anyone has never seen an immediate Obamacare repeal and replace happen the way Trump did it...

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    7. Re: "Trump said" by shaitand · · Score: 1

      By that logic if someone is using birth control it isn't sex. If anyone cums, tries to cum, and/or tries to make someone cum, it's sex. Similarly, append that list and add "thinks about cumming, tries to make someone think about cumming, or anything that generally culiminates in cumming", and it's cheating.

    8. Re:"Trump said" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump still has 3+ years to do what he promised.
      Or are you just mad because Trump is making good on his other promises.
      Unlike Obama "If you like your doctor you keep your doctor", and "If you like your health insurance you can keep your insurance".

    9. Re:"Trump said" by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 1

      immediately

      --
      Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
  2. yeah, he won by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    he said

    1. Re:yeah, he won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Trump says" must be the modern version of using uncyclopedia as a source.
      You know it is a lie and it doesn't really help you figuring out what the truth is.

  3. Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More American job opportunities for engineers is great news. Letâ(TM)s just accept that as good news. No need to politicize more jobs.

    1. Re: Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Yeah, I dont think Trump had anything to do with it. Broadcom was trying to merge with a US company and was being blocked, so it was cheaper to move and get the deal done. Yay jobs!

    2. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except broadcom's engineering was already basically all based in san jose, I worked with many of them. The only components being done in asia/india were minor firmware components but all the real engineering is already done here, like most companies of that size

    3. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      More American job opportunities for engineers is great news. Letâ(TM)s just accept that as good news. No need to politicize more jobs.

      I sure wish dumb cunts like you would accept reality: Unicode doesn't work here. Stop trying to use it. It just makes you look stupid, like the retarded Asspie who keeps trying to force a square peg into a round hole.

      I just want to whip out my dick and PISS all in your FACE until you finally learn.

    4. Re:Cool. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More American job opportunities for engineers is great news.

      That is not what this is about. This is just a legal change. Maybe a folder will move from one filing cabinet to another. The company is already "co-headquartered" in both Singapore and San Jose. The CEO is not likely to move, and it is possible no one else will either. Technical jobs are the least likely to move.

      All that is changing is that the company will be registered in America instead of Singapore. They will pay higher taxes, but have an easier time with acquisitions. The CEO apparently thought that was a good tradeoff. The shareholders apparently thought otherwise, thus the sell off. CEOs tend to like acquisitions because it makes their companies bigger and activates the primitive "hunter" instincts in their brains as they seek out "prey". But they are usually bad deals for the shareholders of the acquiring company.

    5. Re: Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the problem is that slashdot hasnâ(TM)t done a meaningful backend upgrade in 20 years. Dont blame Unicode when the problem is the site not accepting it, not modern tools that use it.

    6. Re: Cool. by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      You have no idea how much it warms my heart to see that there are still slashdot users more passionate about character encoding than politics.

    7. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their shit is made in china, they have plenty of foreign locations to funnel money to. they won't pay higher taxes. are you kidding? and the u.s. economy won't see that supposed $20 billion boost, either. this is just some more trump bullshit.

    8. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      £ ½ € Ü ¥

      You're absolutely correct, Unicode (sic) doesn't work here

      Er, wait. Can anyone explain why, e.g., the cent sign or the thorn character don't work but these others do

      By which I mean something more than /. is just fucking lame.

    9. Re:Cool. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Dont' think there will be any new jobs. Broadcom is essentially a US company anyway that was acquired last year, and the old headquarters was kept around. Jobs that are currently in the US will stay in the US, and jobs that are overseas will stay overseas. But sure, let's keep Donald happy, it's safer than when he's mad.

    10. Re:Cool. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Er, wait. Can anyone explain why, e.g., the cent sign or the thorn character don't work but these others do

      Because they have entries in the ASCII table for whatever font this is?

      ¥ is 0xA5 as far as I can tell, for example.

    11. Re: Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the cost of fewer jobs elsewhere. I don't see the advantage.

    12. Re: Cool. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      You have no idea how much it warms my heart to see that there are still slashdot users more passionate about character encoding than politics.

      Well, there's a remote possibility that character encoding issues can be fixed. The same cannot be said about politics.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    13. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, wait. Can anyone explain why, e.g., the cent sign or the thorn character don't work but these others do

      Because they have entries in the ASCII table for whatever font this is?

      ¥ is 0xA5 as far as I can tell, for example.

      In the ASCII table? Cent sign and thorn characters are Latin-1 (ISO 8859-1), not ASCII, as are £, ½, Ü, and ¥; and € is Latin-15. (In addition to being Unicode.)

    14. Re:Cool. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      their shit is made in china

      Most of their sales are also in China.

      they won't pay higher taxes. are you kidding?

      The shareholders think differently, or their stock would not have dropped. If they avoid taxes by leaving money offshore, it will be harder than ever for them to create jobs in America. It is easier for foreign corporations to invest in America than for American companies to invest in America.

      the u.s. economy won't see that supposed $20 billion boost, either. this is just some more trump bullshit.

      Totally agree. The net effect on the American economy will likely be zero or negative.

    15. Re:Cool. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I am proud to announce that I have created symlinks from my Singapore folder documents to my America folder. #MAGA

    16. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except broadcom's engineering was already basically all based in san jose, I worked with many of them. The only components being done in asia/india were minor firmware components but all the real engineering is already done here, like most companies of that size

      I worked in their much larger Irvine location and that was largely engineering. I also dealt with semiconductor and hardware engineers in Arizona, India, and Israel.

    17. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their semiconductors are made in 2 or 3 fabrication facilities in Taiwan. They have several locations in Red China, but I don't know what they are.

    18. Re:Cool. by psycho12345 · · Score: 1

      Most of Broadcoms main engineering is already here, in Irvine. They are finishing their new campus, it is right down the street from my alma mater (UCI).

    19. Re: Cool. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      If you push that meme hard enough, the stupid might even believe it.

    20. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't about acquisitions.

      It is about a return to something like the Bretton Woods System. The value of the USD is going to fall, probably about 25%.

    21. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh -- the stock (AVGO) already recovered before the day closed and is even up in after hours trading.

      The company that is called Broadcom Limited today originally spun out of Agilent (HP) as Avago Technologies. Since then, it has been acquiring companies (notably LSI Logic and the old Broadcom Corp), with the share price steadily climbing from $15 to $260. I doubt its shareholders think they've gotten bad deals through all these acquisitions.

    22. Re: Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering they're paying Fixconn several billion tax payer dollars, i wonder how much BComm is getting to make this title change?

    23. Re: Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess we'll see, fuckdick. Please kill yourself.

    24. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yea, irvine, I had a few minor dealings with you guys :) Mostly just when it was something related closer to the hardware like a really wierd issue between one specific tv and the hdmi output on a box. Our san jose team was usually our reps to the irvine guys for the most part

    25. Re: Cool. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      This is the part where Trump is right. Corporations are mindless profit machines. Right or wrong has nothing to do with it, cut corporate taxes by 15% and there is a dramatically lower incentive to offshore, moreover it is 15% cheaper to operate in the US than it otherwise would be. That 15% impacts those cold mindless decisions in a substantial way. That is not the same thing as just giving the money to the rich people and hoping they'll spend it. Those evil corporations (including the small ones that are really just one guy) ARE our economy, collectively they provide pretty much all the jobs. They aren't going to give that difference back as a generous handout, but they will take advantage of that extra 15% margin and expand anywhere that lets them so they can make more money and as a side effect they'll create jobs, offer new services, etc.

    26. Re: Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is true, whats to stop them from moving, merging, then moving out?

  4. Hock Tan? by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

    The CEO don't sound so Murican to me. #MSGA!

  5. But... but... RUSSIAN COLLUSION! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *sniffle* the russians*sniffle*

  6. ehhh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So less Broadcom moving and more US parent company consolidating assets? Doesn't even say they are closing the Singapore office though. Sounds like another Trump circlejerk fluff piece like the poors saps at the Carrier plant that thought they were keeping their jobs.

  7. I Am Betting... by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...That this has something to do with the ongoing legal battle between Apple & Broadcom. Something like, if Broadcom is a U.S. based company then they can get the ITC to block Apple importing any iPhones due to alleged patent infringement. Any takers?

    1. Re:I Am Betting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are thinking of Qualcomm, not Broadcom.

    2. Re:I Am Betting... by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...That this has something to do with the ongoing legal battle between Apple & Broadcom. Something like, if Broadcom is a U.S. based company then they can get the ITC to block Apple importing any iPhones due to alleged patent infringement. Any takers?

      I guess I lose the bet. It's Qualcomm not Broadcom that Apple is in a worldwide battle with at present.

    3. Re:I Am Betting... by WheezyJoe · · Score: 0

      I am betting Trump is in need of a distraction, like maybe this latest fallout from the Mueller investigation: Sam Clovis, intended to take a science post at the Department of Agriculture (although he has no background in agriculture or science) is dropping out because of his ties to George Papadopoulos, the first person to plead guilty in the Russia probe.

      Earlier this year, Trump nominated him to a formal position within the department: the Undersecretary of Research, Education, and Economics. That position... is often referred to as Agriculture's chief scientist. The law that created the position indicates that the person nominated for it should be chosen “from among distinguished scientists with specialized training or significant experience in agricultural research, education, and economics."

      That description is a poor fit for Clovis... Clovis admits he hasn't taken any courses or published any research in science or agriculture. Instead, he suggested he was qualified because some of the courses he taught included some material on agriculture, and he had run for statewide office in Iowa. "One cannot be a credible candidate in that state," Clovis contended, "without significant agricultural experience and knowledge.”

      This is too funny. Don T. said he'd “hire the best people.” Well, as scientists go, Clovis is an excellent talk-show host.. He's out now, but there's plenty more appointees to help you question whether studying hard was worth it.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    4. Re:I Am Betting... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      On one hand, every politician lies about all of this stuff, they all say they want to hire the best people. On the other hand, Trump was extremely vocal about how he was going to be different and he had a quite excitable voting base insisting that he would be different. So is it irony, hypocrisy, irrational exuberation, a learning experience for the voters, or...?

    5. Re:I Am Betting... by nnet · · Score: 1

      where HASNT he been different :)

    6. Re:I Am Betting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still a valid point. It staves off Intel's moves into Broadcom's market, where Broadcom is actually the major player in the wireless and networking chip market, not Intel.

    7. Re:I Am Betting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What move? Intel has been a major player in both networking and wireless chips for two decades. Intel is the gold standard for NICs.

    8. Re:I Am Betting... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Simply the new digital security maxim. It all must be done locally for government contracts because we are actually already in world war three, the corporate wars and US corporations vs EU corporations vs Russian Corporations VS China corporations. None can be trusted and they are now quite capable of digitally destroying each other, not only directly by via the governments the strive to control. So companies trading with the US government will have to be US companies because the threat of catastrophic hacking is too high and software and hardware must be secured and audited.

      The mercenary corporations do more that contract security, they are fighting wars with each other, on the battlefield and digitally at all levels. It is still early in the war but make no mistake it has started.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:I Am Betting... by drew_kime · · Score: 2

      ...That this has something to do with the ongoing legal battle between Apple & Broadcom...

      I guess I lose the bet. It's Qualcomm not Broadcom that Apple is in a worldwide battle with at present.

      Unless Broadcom buys Qualcomm. But I'm sure the timing of that is a coincidence.

      --
      Nope, no sig
  8. Building on delusions of market cap by shanen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The funniest part was the bit about the stock prices. Not just the hilarious and unclear description of the price gyrations, but the insane underlying assumption that the stock prices have any linkage to reality. Today's stock prices are only linked to the fantasy of selling the shares at a higher price, with NO relation to the underlying realities of the property that is supposedly owned by the shares. Actually, most of the shares these years are for fake entities that are just holding companies for random bags of other companies, with a few real companies somewhere at the bottom. Some of the real companies may be producing real products or real services, but most of them are producing illusions like the value of Apple's latest and greatest and most profitable iPhone.

    Remember there is no gawd but profit, and Apple is gawd's chief prophet.

    That's according to Forbes for 2016. The rest of the top 10 include Gilead, Alphabet (AKA the google), Exxon, and some huge gamblers (AKA financial speculators playing games with other people's money and having socialized loss insurance since they're now "too big to fail" (assuming the federal government is still big enough to bail them out when they do fail again)).

    Me? I think we should have tax policies designed to increase freedom. Make companies smaller so we can have smaller government. Make companies smaller so we have more choice and freedom. Make companies smaller so they have smaller profits! Oh, wait. I forgot profit is gawd.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Building on delusions of market cap by deadwill69 · · Score: 1

      I so wish I had points. You're dead on!

    2. Re:Building on delusions of market cap by imgod2u · · Score: 1

      To play Devil's Advocate. Gilead Sciences, because they're at the size and scale they are, were able to completely cure Hepatitis-B....

      That likely wouldn't happen with "small companies with small profits".

    3. Re:Building on delusions of market cap by shanen · · Score: 1

      Is the devil really so naive? I suggest that you read about how private pharmaceutical companies set their research priorities. They do NOT want to spend money developing medicines that actually cure diseases, though it sometimes happens. Most of the researchers are less concerned about profit. To maximize Gilead's profits they would actually prefer to develop medicines that address symptoms without curing the underlying diseases. Also, they use the patents almost exclusively to maximize profits, not to accelerate the progress of medical science. An inexpensive medication that immediately and permanently cures a disease is just a terrible investment.

      Wandering away from the original article, but there's some fundamental confusion about "the pursuit of happiness" as a justification for greed. A certain amount of greed is okay, but once your greed for profit causes you to hurt other people, then it is not okay. Setting research priorities based on profit maximization is just what the devil ordered.

      Wandering even farther afield, I think healthcare should be considered under the "right to life" part of the Constitution. The government actually has a legitimate interest in helping people live longer. Countries like Japan are able to do a much better job of providing healthcare than America while spending less money because profit and greed are not the driving factors. Hey, devil, do you even know that Japan's healthcare system is quite similar to ObamaCare except that it includes public insurance options to keep the private insurance companies honest?

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    4. Re:Building on delusions of market cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I think we should have tax policies designed to increase freedom."

      What?

      "Make companies smaller so we can have smaller government."

      Oh jesus, you're one of those.

    5. Re:Building on delusions of market cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of those what? A jew?

    6. Re:Building on delusions of market cap by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

      > Oh, wait. I forgot profit is gawd. You a commie or something ? /sarcasm

  9. Good Bet by mykepredko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That was my first thought - they go from being presented as a litigious off shore company to a domestic technology powerhouse that is worried about protecting it's IP.

    All by moving an office; the actual engineers and IP isn't going anywhere.

  10. Broadcom, huh by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    Anyone here ever work there? I hear it's kind of a rough place to work.

    1. Re:Broadcom, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I just got home from work there.
      Spent the whole day trashing a zillion requests for chip-specs by those
      free-software nitwits. Some even want us to open-source our carefully
      crafted and outstanding quality drivers. Are they for real?

    2. Re:Broadcom, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. The word bloodshed has been used many times after the Avago acquisition.

    3. Re:Broadcom, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked there for quite a while. My first project was testing a dual ethernet controller chip. When I google searched its part number, I got a bunch of hits on pieces of Linux and FreeBSD kernel source code.

    4. Re:Broadcom, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a EE contractor there for years and got laid off the day the Avago inversion deal closed. I later got hired back as a contractor in a different lab, then laid off again. They couldn't make up their mind about having contractors.

      During the brief time I was back, I noted that at least two of their more remote buildings had been closed after mass layoffs, all of the receptionists and most of the security people and secretaries were gone, and it was difficult-to-impossible to get IT support because most of them were gone too. I didn't have an office computer until my new boss took one out of the lab for my use, and I didn't have a phone until I got hold of one of the few support people left, and he said he was quitting due to low pay. (and my cell phone had no signal in that building)

  11. Carrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Twitler says a lot of things. 90% of what he's said has ended up being lies. But he called Cruz "Lying Ted." It it wasn't so sad it'd be funny.

    But you Regressivetards will keep defending him no matter what. I know you'll stand by your principles and not buy health care for yourself under the ACA when you get cancer or something similarly serious.

  12. Nice job President Trump... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Our president's doing great work helping put folks in the USA to work in new jobs - my hat's off to the man for it.

    APK

    P.S.=> There is NO arguing with success on his end & this is only 1 of MANY such things our good President is doing... apk

    1. Re:Nice job President Trump... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. This is just planned post-merger consolidation. America is the place for headquarters and marketing. When they move all of their manufacturing here, maybe Trump can be credited.

    2. Re:Nice job President Trump... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Riding on the coattails of the guy who preceded him. But you won't give that guy any credit because his skin isn't the same pink as your racist ass.

      Eight years of non-stop growth, but you want to give Twitler all the credit after a mere nine months in office. And seven of those nine months of the previous fiscal year. Yeah, the fiscal year that started before Twiitler was even elected.

      But yeah, keep praising Mr. Grab 'Em By The Pussy.

    3. Re:Nice job President Trump... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You set the stage, fucko, with eight years of "But, but, Bush!"

      Reap what you sow. Which wasn't much. Because the stock market doesn't soar to the heavens just because the "guy" "responsible" literally left office.

    4. Re:Nice job President Trump... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word salad!

      I didn't know that Twitler was posting on /. too.

    5. Re:Nice job President Trump... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You set the stage, fucko, with eight years of "But, but, Bush!"

      Said no one ever. I'm thoroughly convinced that the right live in an alternative universe.

  13. Re:Read The TFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Broadcom is a Singapore company that is trying to acquire (not merge with) *Brocade*.

  14. "I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someone" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "I could stand in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot someone, and people would still vote for me."

    This is what your God Trump thinks of you, fuckers. Basically, he told you to your face that you're all fucking morons, and you proved him right.

    Maybe next time you won't choose a fucking psychopath as your presidential candidate. But I doubt it.

  15. Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A photo opp will not defend Donald Trump from the many indictments related to his collusion with Russia.

    1. Re:Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Or neuter the solid fact that he's a douche

      Trump & Billy Bush lewd conversation about women, Donald Trump On Tape: I Grab Women "By The Pussy”

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  16. 2 SCOOPS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 GENDERS...
    2 TERMS!!

  17. Who gives a toss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTH is a country's purported leader doing taking time out of his supposedly busy schedule to do some glad-handing with businesses? What's next, "Trump congratulates McDonald's on opening a new outlet two blocks from the white house"? "Trump visits local KFC to sample latest artery-clogging concoction. 'It's great,really great.'"? "Trump poses with gas-guzzling car maker mucky-mucks after blocking Tesla's attempt to sell cars in another hick state"?

    1. Re:Who gives a toss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normally Presidents avoid naming specific companies when dealing with the domestic economy. President can't call out specific companies because those same companies contributed large sums of money getting them elected. In Trumps case he declared the F-35 program was to expensive and it might be cheaper to look for a replacement. First off the government is stuck for better or worse with the F-35 so nobody would actually go looking for a replacement but Lockheed Martin's stock dropped 15% in one day. Lockheed Martin then knocked 10% off the cost of each plane and committed themselves to look into dropping the price even further. He called out Ford for moving a substantial amount of jobs to Mexico and Ford halted the process. They eventually did move jobs to Mexico but they also kept a sizeable number in the US. A US President doesn't have as much power as people think. Almost every single decision a President makes can be thwarted by Congress. Even as CIC the President can only deploy US forces for 90 days. If the President cannot get Congressional approval in 90 days the war ends. Congress controls the government checkbook. Executive orders can be litigated to death. And nobody really gives a shit about end of term Presidential Pardons. The President just wields the largest bullhorn and spotlight on the planet and I imagine that worries a lot of powerful corporations. Facebook, Twitter, and Google are fighting a losing battle and are on the verge of having their companies fall under the same government regulations that every other media outlet in the country has to follow. A few Presidential tweets about Apple's foreign manufacturing and booking their profits in a foreign country to avoid paying US taxes could put a real crimp in Apple's corporate behavior.

  18. New headquarter in Irvine, CA? by BLToday · · Score: 1

    They’ve been building that location off the 405 for about 4 years.

    1. Re:New headquarter in Irvine, CA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That property being developed in Irvine was sold. Broadcom will lease back space from the new owners

  19. "Fucko"? Lmao (quit projecting)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I never liked or voted for either Bush (or Obama) but I am all for what President Trump's primary focus has been - putting people to work in new jobs (which he has delivered on) - man's a businessman (which is what the BUSINESS of the USA needed) & he means business + executes excellently on that very front, no questions asked.

    APK

    P.S.=> As to your illogical off-topic ad hominem attack & projecting your OWN issues onto me? Give up - not even a 'nice try'... apk

  20. Sure sure... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever - you & "yours" (unidentifiable "ne'er-do-wells") LOST - get over it!

    APK

    P.S.=> Racist ass? Wtf did I say in my post you replied to that is "RACIS" (lol) your "trump card" for LOSERS (like you)... apk

    1. Re: Sure sure... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You routinely post Anti Jew rants all the fucking time. Are you kidding me ?

  21. TwitLer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  22. Re:2025 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could just as easily say "three more years" and have about the same chance of being correct."

    You're still pulling the same identity politics shit and you'll get the same results.

  23. Re: 2025 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do enjoy my slaves. every night. every position.
    How are yours?
    "kek"

  24. Re:Read The TFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A fat man expects layoffs for others
    waiting in the closet
    His name is Chris

  25. Re:Read The TFA... by slew · · Score: 1

    Broadcom is a Singapore company that is trying to acquire (not merge with) *Brocade*.

    To be extra confusing, The "new" Broadcom was a Singapore company named Avago, that bought a US based company named Broadcom and after they did that, they renamed themselves Broadcom (although their stock trading symbol is still AVGO). The "new" Broadcom (was Avago), is now trying to buy Brocade (another US based company).

  26. CREIMER WANTS TO MARRY A CHILD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was a quality post by CREIMER, aka CDREIMER aka CHRIS DALE REIMER aka CHRIS REIMER aka GOOGLE PAGERANK. If you enjoyed that post maybe you'd like to experience some of the classics!!!

    Here CHRIS DALE REIMER discusses his marriage and retirement plans!

    If all my assets were liquidated, I would still have enough cash to buy a new car and head off to Mexico to find a chica to marry.
    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    You're aware that are some states in the U.S. that allow underage marriage as young as 14 years old?
    https://slashdot.org/comments....
    As for my comment, I've heard stories of engineers retiring at 50, moving to Mexico and marrying underage girls. Since I work with ex-military, the Philippines is a popular retirement spot for marrying underage girls as well. It's all about getting the most bang for your retirement dollars.
    https://slashdot.org/comments....
    That only works if you retire to Mexico, build a mansion (by local standards), marry an underage sweet thing and bequeath all your possessions to the village.
    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    1. Re:CREIMER WANTS TO MARRY A CHILD by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      By aka AC.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  27. Re: "I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the kind of people that live on 5th Avenue, I would move to Chicago to vote for him twice

  28. I have an idea by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    They should move across from Apple HQ so they can save on postage and hand deliver the copyright infringement notices.

    1. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confusing Broadcom with Qualcomm. Also, all the commercial buildings across from the Apple HQ are occupied by Apple.

    2. Re:I have an idea by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

      That's Qualcomm you are thinking about.

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  29. Re: "I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donald Trump LIVED on fifth avenue. So you hate fifth avenue people so much that you elected one president ?

    You are such a fucking dumbass. Or a fucking troll, which is even worse.

  30. If corporations are people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are they allowed to live anywhere on the planet and I'm not? Why can't I "domicile" myself in a country with a healthcare system? We should kill all the elites and burn it all down.

  31. Incorrect Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The *correct* headline should read "Broadcom CEO Announces Moving Headquarters To US In Meeting With Trump". If the CEO announces it, then there is no heresay or second-hand information, as the title implied.

  32. And there you have it... by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    > semiconductor company Broadcom Ltd. is returning its headquarters to the U.S. from Singapore
    [snip]
    >The company's shares declined as much as 4 percent to $248.87 after the announcement.

    MAGA!

  33. Re: "I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fail to see why this quote would put Trump in a bad light. It seems to show quite a good understanding of the American voters.

    No endorsement of Trump intended, I'm on the other side of the pond and can only say that collectively, you're getting what you paid for. Sadly it impacts the rest of the world as well...

  34. Just like their devices by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

    The hardware will be there, but will still require a binary blob to provide any kind of useful function.

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. Re: "I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wasn't intended to put TRUMP in a bad light, except maybe to confirm that he's a ruthless, compassionless, unethical sociopath.

    It's intended to shed light on the sorry state of democracy in the U.S. and, since I have no reason to beleive that americans are any worse than anybody else, in the world in general.

  37. Brocade acquisition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Not sure how big this piece is, but if Broadcom is a US based company, their acquisition of Brocades' fibre channel switching business doesn't have to go through CFIUS (Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States) review.

    Broadcoms current strategy seems to be mostly built on buying out other companies, so likely there are deals in the pipeline that would benefit from them being a US company as well.

  38. Re:2025 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry, you're getting screwed over just as much as everybody else.

  39. Re:"I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someon by gtall · · Score: 1

    Actually, most of us voted for the OTHER woman in the race. It was only the quirk of the Electoral Collage that gave us this knob.

    The embarrassing part is that a significant portion of the U.S. still think he's a good idea. When I saw the reports on the White Lives Matter demonstration in Tenn., I thought I would puke me guts out. Glorifying Nazis, as they did, was a kick in the gut to those who lost family members in WWII in Europe. That told the rest of America that they had thrown the American ideals out the window.

  40. Re: CREIMER wants underage sweet thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why am I the only one mad about it?

  41. Re: CREIMER wants underage sweet thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because no one cares about your fake Internet rage.

  42. Make wl great for once. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my mind, this is a good partnership. After all, Broadcom is like the Trump of chip manufacturers. Overhyped underdelivered crap. I'm surprised the Broadcom chips aren't Dorito red. If Trump had access to the wl STA drivers, he would withold them and be a jerk about it for like a decade just to be annoying too.

    I want wireless firmware that works in any Linux distro out the box. I am tired of using reverse engineered junk drivers that can't use the advanced features off the chip like AP and monitor mode. Don't even get me started on ndiswrapper. You jerks are responsible for this. I bought your damn chip and you're going to tell me how to use it? Are you in cahoots with MS to keep Linux home desktop saturation low or something? Your products have been out basically unchanged for over a decade now, give us halfway decent Linux support. Sheesh.

    I avoid your products whenever I can. Made in Murrika won't change that.