Slashdot Mirror


Trump Says Broadcom Is Moving Headquarters To US From Singapore (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: President Donald Trump said semiconductor company Broadcom Ltd. is returning its headquarters to the U.S. from Singapore. Broadcom Chief Executive Officer Hock Tan joined Trump Thursday in the Oval Office for the announcement. Tan said the move to domicile the company in the U.S. would bring $20 billion in revenue into the country. The two men didn't specify the site of the new main location. Broadcom's website lists San Jose, California, as an existing corporate co-headquarters and has done so since the present company was created in 2016 in one of the semiconductor industry's largest acquisitions when Avago Technologies Ltd. acquired then-Broadcom Corp. The company's shares declined as much as 4 percent to $248.87 after the announcement. The stock had gained 47 percent this year through Wednesday's close.

38 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. "Trump said" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yeah, we should all know better by now.

    1. Re:"Trump said" by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "We will immediately repeal and replace Obamacare - and nobody can do that like me. We will save $'s and have much better healthcare! ~Candidate Donald Trump, Feb 9, 2016.

      --
      Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
    2. Re: "Trump said" by shaitand · · Score: 1

      By that logic if someone is using birth control it isn't sex. If anyone cums, tries to cum, and/or tries to make someone cum, it's sex. Similarly, append that list and add "thinks about cumming, tries to make someone think about cumming, or anything that generally culiminates in cumming", and it's cheating.

    3. Re:"Trump said" by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 1

      immediately

      --
      Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
  2. yeah, he won by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    he said

  3. I Am Betting... by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...That this has something to do with the ongoing legal battle between Apple & Broadcom. Something like, if Broadcom is a U.S. based company then they can get the ITC to block Apple importing any iPhones due to alleged patent infringement. Any takers?

    1. Re:I Am Betting... by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...That this has something to do with the ongoing legal battle between Apple & Broadcom. Something like, if Broadcom is a U.S. based company then they can get the ITC to block Apple importing any iPhones due to alleged patent infringement. Any takers?

      I guess I lose the bet. It's Qualcomm not Broadcom that Apple is in a worldwide battle with at present.

    2. Re:I Am Betting... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      On one hand, every politician lies about all of this stuff, they all say they want to hire the best people. On the other hand, Trump was extremely vocal about how he was going to be different and he had a quite excitable voting base insisting that he would be different. So is it irony, hypocrisy, irrational exuberation, a learning experience for the voters, or...?

    3. Re:I Am Betting... by nnet · · Score: 1

      where HASNT he been different :)

    4. Re:I Am Betting... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Simply the new digital security maxim. It all must be done locally for government contracts because we are actually already in world war three, the corporate wars and US corporations vs EU corporations vs Russian Corporations VS China corporations. None can be trusted and they are now quite capable of digitally destroying each other, not only directly by via the governments the strive to control. So companies trading with the US government will have to be US companies because the threat of catastrophic hacking is too high and software and hardware must be secured and audited.

      The mercenary corporations do more that contract security, they are fighting wars with each other, on the battlefield and digitally at all levels. It is still early in the war but make no mistake it has started.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:I Am Betting... by drew_kime · · Score: 2

      ...That this has something to do with the ongoing legal battle between Apple & Broadcom...

      I guess I lose the bet. It's Qualcomm not Broadcom that Apple is in a worldwide battle with at present.

      Unless Broadcom buys Qualcomm. But I'm sure the timing of that is a coincidence.

      --
      Nope, no sig
  4. Building on delusions of market cap by shanen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The funniest part was the bit about the stock prices. Not just the hilarious and unclear description of the price gyrations, but the insane underlying assumption that the stock prices have any linkage to reality. Today's stock prices are only linked to the fantasy of selling the shares at a higher price, with NO relation to the underlying realities of the property that is supposedly owned by the shares. Actually, most of the shares these years are for fake entities that are just holding companies for random bags of other companies, with a few real companies somewhere at the bottom. Some of the real companies may be producing real products or real services, but most of them are producing illusions like the value of Apple's latest and greatest and most profitable iPhone.

    Remember there is no gawd but profit, and Apple is gawd's chief prophet.

    That's according to Forbes for 2016. The rest of the top 10 include Gilead, Alphabet (AKA the google), Exxon, and some huge gamblers (AKA financial speculators playing games with other people's money and having socialized loss insurance since they're now "too big to fail" (assuming the federal government is still big enough to bail them out when they do fail again)).

    Me? I think we should have tax policies designed to increase freedom. Make companies smaller so we can have smaller government. Make companies smaller so we have more choice and freedom. Make companies smaller so they have smaller profits! Oh, wait. I forgot profit is gawd.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Building on delusions of market cap by deadwill69 · · Score: 1

      I so wish I had points. You're dead on!

    2. Re:Building on delusions of market cap by imgod2u · · Score: 1

      To play Devil's Advocate. Gilead Sciences, because they're at the size and scale they are, were able to completely cure Hepatitis-B....

      That likely wouldn't happen with "small companies with small profits".

    3. Re:Building on delusions of market cap by shanen · · Score: 1

      Is the devil really so naive? I suggest that you read about how private pharmaceutical companies set their research priorities. They do NOT want to spend money developing medicines that actually cure diseases, though it sometimes happens. Most of the researchers are less concerned about profit. To maximize Gilead's profits they would actually prefer to develop medicines that address symptoms without curing the underlying diseases. Also, they use the patents almost exclusively to maximize profits, not to accelerate the progress of medical science. An inexpensive medication that immediately and permanently cures a disease is just a terrible investment.

      Wandering away from the original article, but there's some fundamental confusion about "the pursuit of happiness" as a justification for greed. A certain amount of greed is okay, but once your greed for profit causes you to hurt other people, then it is not okay. Setting research priorities based on profit maximization is just what the devil ordered.

      Wandering even farther afield, I think healthcare should be considered under the "right to life" part of the Constitution. The government actually has a legitimate interest in helping people live longer. Countries like Japan are able to do a much better job of providing healthcare than America while spending less money because profit and greed are not the driving factors. Hey, devil, do you even know that Japan's healthcare system is quite similar to ObamaCare except that it includes public insurance options to keep the private insurance companies honest?

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    4. Re:Building on delusions of market cap by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

      > Oh, wait. I forgot profit is gawd. You a commie or something ? /sarcasm

  5. Good Bet by mykepredko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That was my first thought - they go from being presented as a litigious off shore company to a domestic technology powerhouse that is worried about protecting it's IP.

    All by moving an office; the actual engineers and IP isn't going anywhere.

  6. Broadcom, huh by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    Anyone here ever work there? I hear it's kind of a rough place to work.

  7. Re:Cool. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More American job opportunities for engineers is great news.

    That is not what this is about. This is just a legal change. Maybe a folder will move from one filing cabinet to another. The company is already "co-headquartered" in both Singapore and San Jose. The CEO is not likely to move, and it is possible no one else will either. Technical jobs are the least likely to move.

    All that is changing is that the company will be registered in America instead of Singapore. They will pay higher taxes, but have an easier time with acquisitions. The CEO apparently thought that was a good tradeoff. The shareholders apparently thought otherwise, thus the sell off. CEOs tend to like acquisitions because it makes their companies bigger and activates the primitive "hunter" instincts in their brains as they seek out "prey". But they are usually bad deals for the shareholders of the acquiring company.

  8. "I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someone" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "I could stand in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot someone, and people would still vote for me."

    This is what your God Trump thinks of you, fuckers. Basically, he told you to your face that you're all fucking morons, and you proved him right.

    Maybe next time you won't choose a fucking psychopath as your presidential candidate. But I doubt it.

  9. Re: Cool. by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

    You have no idea how much it warms my heart to see that there are still slashdot users more passionate about character encoding than politics.

  10. Re:Cool. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Dont' think there will be any new jobs. Broadcom is essentially a US company anyway that was acquired last year, and the old headquarters was kept around. Jobs that are currently in the US will stay in the US, and jobs that are overseas will stay overseas. But sure, let's keep Donald happy, it's safer than when he's mad.

  11. Re:Cool. by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Er, wait. Can anyone explain why, e.g., the cent sign or the thorn character don't work but these others do

    Because they have entries in the ASCII table for whatever font this is?

    ¥ is 0xA5 as far as I can tell, for example.

  12. New headquarter in Irvine, CA? by BLToday · · Score: 1

    They’ve been building that location off the 405 for about 4 years.

  13. Re: Cool. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    You have no idea how much it warms my heart to see that there are still slashdot users more passionate about character encoding than politics.

    Well, there's a remote possibility that character encoding issues can be fixed. The same cannot be said about politics.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  14. Re:Cool. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    their shit is made in china

    Most of their sales are also in China.

    they won't pay higher taxes. are you kidding?

    The shareholders think differently, or their stock would not have dropped. If they avoid taxes by leaving money offshore, it will be harder than ever for them to create jobs in America. It is easier for foreign corporations to invest in America than for American companies to invest in America.

    the u.s. economy won't see that supposed $20 billion boost, either. this is just some more trump bullshit.

    Totally agree. The net effect on the American economy will likely be zero or negative.

  15. Re:Cool. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    I am proud to announce that I have created symlinks from my Singapore folder documents to my America folder. #MAGA

  16. Re:Read The TFA... by slew · · Score: 1

    Broadcom is a Singapore company that is trying to acquire (not merge with) *Brocade*.

    To be extra confusing, The "new" Broadcom was a Singapore company named Avago, that bought a US based company named Broadcom and after they did that, they renamed themselves Broadcom (although their stock trading symbol is still AVGO). The "new" Broadcom (was Avago), is now trying to buy Brocade (another US based company).

  17. Re:Cool. by psycho12345 · · Score: 1

    Most of Broadcoms main engineering is already here, in Irvine. They are finishing their new campus, it is right down the street from my alma mater (UCI).

  18. Re:Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Or neuter the solid fact that he's a douche

    Trump & Billy Bush lewd conversation about women, Donald Trump On Tape: I Grab Women "By The Pussy”

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  19. Re:CREIMER WANTS TO MARRY A CHILD by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    By aka AC.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  20. Re: Cool. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    If you push that meme hard enough, the stupid might even believe it.

  21. I have an idea by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    They should move across from Apple HQ so they can save on postage and hand deliver the copyright infringement notices.

    1. Re:I have an idea by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

      That's Qualcomm you are thinking about.

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  22. And there you have it... by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    > semiconductor company Broadcom Ltd. is returning its headquarters to the U.S. from Singapore
    [snip]
    >The company's shares declined as much as 4 percent to $248.87 after the announcement.

    MAGA!

  23. Just like their devices by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

    The hardware will be there, but will still require a binary blob to provide any kind of useful function.

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
  24. Re: Cool. by shaitand · · Score: 1

    This is the part where Trump is right. Corporations are mindless profit machines. Right or wrong has nothing to do with it, cut corporate taxes by 15% and there is a dramatically lower incentive to offshore, moreover it is 15% cheaper to operate in the US than it otherwise would be. That 15% impacts those cold mindless decisions in a substantial way. That is not the same thing as just giving the money to the rich people and hoping they'll spend it. Those evil corporations (including the small ones that are really just one guy) ARE our economy, collectively they provide pretty much all the jobs. They aren't going to give that difference back as a generous handout, but they will take advantage of that extra 15% margin and expand anywhere that lets them so they can make more money and as a side effect they'll create jobs, offer new services, etc.

  25. Re:"I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someon by gtall · · Score: 1

    Actually, most of us voted for the OTHER woman in the race. It was only the quirk of the Electoral Collage that gave us this knob.

    The embarrassing part is that a significant portion of the U.S. still think he's a good idea. When I saw the reports on the White Lives Matter demonstration in Tenn., I thought I would puke me guts out. Glorifying Nazis, as they did, was a kick in the gut to those who lost family members in WWII in Europe. That told the rest of America that they had thrown the American ideals out the window.