Slashdot Mirror


Many Employers Are Using Tools To Monitor Their Staff's Web-browsing Patterns, Keystrokes, Social Media Posts (theguardian.com)

Olivia Solon, reporting for The Guardian: How can an employer make sure its remote workers aren't slacking off? In the case of talent management company Crossover, the answer is to take photos of them every 10 minutes through their webcam. The pictures are taken by Crossover's productivity tool, WorkSmart, and combine with screenshots of their workstations along with other data -- including app use and keystrokes -- to come up with a "focus score" and an "intensity score" that can be used to assess the value of freelancers. Today's workplace surveillance software is a digital panopticon that began with email and phone monitoring but now includes keeping track of web-browsing patterns, text messages, screenshots, keystrokes, social media posts, private messaging apps like WhatsApp and even face-to-face interactions with co-workers. Crossover's Sanjeev Patni insists that workers get over the initial self-consciousness after a few days and accept the need for such monitoring as they do CCTV in shopping malls.

5 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. Well duh. by plopez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Companies tend to be fascist institutions. You follow the leader, obey the hierarchy, and do what you are told. You have no input into how things work and are punished for deviating.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re: Well duh. by Maritz · · Score: 5, Informative

      In France they passed a law that workers aren't allowed to answer emails at home outside of office hours. You think they'll allow this? LOL.

      In Europe, you take a job and work for an employer. You don't have to bend over and pull your fucking cheeks apart like a yank does.

      No citation fucking needed.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  2. Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    None of this is necessary. What's necessary is to set goals and then assess whether the goals are being achieved. If workers are on the clock, then you probably don't want them billing you if they're doing unrelated tasks. However, a good manager should have some idea how long tasks ought to take and be able to determine if the workers aren't productive. The surveillance is completely unnecessary. However, they are right about one thing. Just like Big Brother players, you tend to forget the surveillance is there after a few days.

  3. This doesn't work for software development by nickjj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of freelance platforms have been doing this for years but it's not a reasonable solution.

    You can't measure development productivity based on trackable "focus" and "intensity" scores because a lot of that happens inside of your brain.

    I might decide to just stop what I'm doing and do 50 push ups while thinking about a problem, and then afterwards spend 10 minutes doing nothing from a camera's POV. In my mind, I'm churning through really complex data models and trying to make sense of it all which is absolutely focusing on the work at hand.

    1. Re:This doesn't work for software development by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I still solve a lot of problems off the clock, usually while on a drive when (other than attention required for driving) my mind can wander. I can spend hours at my desk, extremely focused, but go around in circles... and then during a trip to a satellite office the answer will come to me.

      Find a way to measure that!

      Much like wait and call timers for telemarketing firms (and shitty customer service cube farms), these systems are not for good companies... they're for shitty companies paying shitty wages for basic monkey work, and they want to make sure the monkeys are mashing keys.