Slashdot Mirror


Big Tobacco Loses 11-Year Fight, Forced To Broadcast 'Dangers of Smoking' Ads (nbcnews.com)

An anonymous reader quotes NBC News: Smoking kills 1,200 people a day. The tobacco companies worked to make them as addictive as possible. There is no such thing as a safer cigarette. Ads with these statements hit the major television networks and newspapers this weekend, but they are not being placed by the American Cancer Society or other health groups. They're being placed by major tobacco companies, under the orders of the federal courts. "The ads will finally run after 11 years of appeals by the tobacco companies aimed at delaying and weakening them," the American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, National African American Tobacco Prevention Network and the Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund said in a joint statement.

"It's a pretty significant moment," the American Cancer Society's Cliff Douglas said. "This is the first time they have had to âfess up and tell the whole truth." The Justice Department started its racketeering lawsuit against the tobacco companies in 1999, seeking to force them to make up for decades of deception. Federal district judge Gladys Kessler ruled in 2006 that they'd have to pay for and place the ads, but the companies kept tying things up with appeals. "Employing the highest paid lawyers in America, the tobacco companies used every tool at their disposal to delay and complicate this litigation to avoid their day of reckoning," Douglas added.

The ads will inform Americans TV viewers that "More people die every year from smoking than from murder, AIDS, suicide, drugs, car crashes, and alcohol, combined," according to one of the ads." Besides $170 billion every year in medical costs -- plus another $156 billion in lost productivity -- roughly one in five deaths in America are smoking-related, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, with cigarettes killing 480,000 Americans every year.

4 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Could have done without the productivity remark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    We don't need to know how much money could have been made exploiting them.

    Why not? It's the only thing the big game capitalist understands. The world is a ledger. You gotta play the numbers game. To them, everything else is gibberish.

  2. those costs have no meaning... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1, Informative

    Lost productivity... only counts if you don't have enough people to fill the jobs of those who died early.
    Health care costs... of a mostly private healthcare system?
    How much money is raised from tobacco taxes? In 2010 federal taxes bought in $8.8b, in 2010 state taxes bought in $24b
    2 minutes of googling didn't get me any more recent figures.

  3. Re:Big Tobacco is a favorite whipping post of soph by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Informative

    The truth is that non-smokers don't like cigarette smoke because it STINKS. Concerns of getting cancer after 40 years of passive exposure is secondary.

  4. Re:Big Tobacco is a favorite whipping post of soph by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Informative

    The rationale was that the smoke could travel through electrical outlets endangering other residents' clean air.

    Nah, they're lying to you. It's because that smoker stink lasts forever in an apartment. You can paint, change the carpets, and that smell is still noticeable.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.