Slashdot Mirror


Big Tobacco Loses 11-Year Fight, Forced To Broadcast 'Dangers of Smoking' Ads (nbcnews.com)

An anonymous reader quotes NBC News: Smoking kills 1,200 people a day. The tobacco companies worked to make them as addictive as possible. There is no such thing as a safer cigarette. Ads with these statements hit the major television networks and newspapers this weekend, but they are not being placed by the American Cancer Society or other health groups. They're being placed by major tobacco companies, under the orders of the federal courts. "The ads will finally run after 11 years of appeals by the tobacco companies aimed at delaying and weakening them," the American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, National African American Tobacco Prevention Network and the Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund said in a joint statement.

"It's a pretty significant moment," the American Cancer Society's Cliff Douglas said. "This is the first time they have had to âfess up and tell the whole truth." The Justice Department started its racketeering lawsuit against the tobacco companies in 1999, seeking to force them to make up for decades of deception. Federal district judge Gladys Kessler ruled in 2006 that they'd have to pay for and place the ads, but the companies kept tying things up with appeals. "Employing the highest paid lawyers in America, the tobacco companies used every tool at their disposal to delay and complicate this litigation to avoid their day of reckoning," Douglas added.

The ads will inform Americans TV viewers that "More people die every year from smoking than from murder, AIDS, suicide, drugs, car crashes, and alcohol, combined," according to one of the ads." Besides $170 billion every year in medical costs -- plus another $156 billion in lost productivity -- roughly one in five deaths in America are smoking-related, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, with cigarettes killing 480,000 Americans every year.

3 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Follow the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    But who votes in the government representatives? That's right, friends. You.

    This is YOUR fault.

  2. Today: punish devils, tomorrow: punish innocents by whyyisthissohard · · Score: 1, Troll

    Imagine....a federal court orders you to advertise against your own business....this is a horrible precedent.

    Today it's big tobacco, tomorrow it's a political dissenters. Fake news anyone?

  3. Re: Smoke SHIT and DIE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I disagree with ownership of high-capacity military-style arms by civilians, and yes, I know what I'm talking about when I label guns (former Marine here). I believe civilians should be allowed to own handguns with less than 10 rounds, shotguns, and hunting/target rifles. Self defense is easily handled with a pump-action shotgun or a revolver. No one needs AR-15s and AK-pattern rifles. They are now beyond ever being labeled as "benign", no matter how the NRA or other asshat organization may try to market them for civilian use. Both rifles' origins are in killing. Full stop.

    I will not be giving up my civilian guns, though. I live in rural Texas. Do you know how long it would take the police to arrive were I to have a home invasion? Like I tell people, when SECONDS count, the police are MINUTES away. I'll be keeping my 1897 Winchester trench gun and my Smith & Wesson .44 Special, thank you.