Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Rolls Out AI To Detect Suicidal Posts Before They're Reported (techcrunch.com)

Facebook is rolling out "proactive detection" artificial intelligence technology that will scan all posts on the site for patterns of suicidal thoughts, and when necessary send mental health resources to the user at risk or their friends, or contact local first-responders. The goal is to use AI to decrease how long it takes to send help to those in need. TechCrunch reports: Facebook previously tested using AI to detect troubling posts and more prominently surface suicide reporting options to friends in the U.S. Now Facebook is will scour all types of content around the world with this AI, except in the European Union, where General Data Protection Regulation privacy laws on profiling users based on sensitive information complicate the use of this tech. Facebook also will use AI to prioritize particularly risky or urgent user reports so they're more quickly addressed by moderators, and tools to instantly surface local language resources and first-responder contact info. It's also dedicating more moderators to suicide prevention, training them to deal with the cases 24/7, and now has 80 local partners like Save.org, National Suicide Prevention Lifeline and Forefront from which to provide resources to at-risk users and their networks.

79 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Troll bait by countach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How long before this is trolled into oblivion?
    How long before people sue Facebook for false positives and violating their privacy?

    1. Re:Troll bait by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3

      Hopefully, the lawsuits come soon and will be painful -- FB should be a communication tool and not snoop on the content of non-public (i.e. privacy set to anything but "public") communications.

    2. Re: Troll bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If Facebook keeps doing this I'll kill myself

    3. Re:Troll bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      how long before they start alerting 'the authorities' about illegal drug use, underage drinking, academic fraud, and other things, illegal or not... just because facebook doesn't like it (or if someone pays them enough to do it)....

    4. Re:Troll bait by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but really... wouldn't you love to see police arrive at the door of every vaguebook post?

      If anyone cares...

    5. Re:Troll bait by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      How long before this is trolled into oblivion? How long before people sue Facebook for false positives and violating their privacy?

      Well, I won't post on Facebook what I've said here, that when my time draws close, I'm going to choose how and when I shift this mortal coil. I'm anything but suicidal, but have no intention of spending a decade or more in a nursing home, wearing depends and not having much idea of who I am.

      This really transcends creepiness, and turned into intrusion.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:Troll bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When that time comes you may not be coherent enough to realize.
      Anyways, this is the lead up to thought crime.

    7. Re:Troll bait by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      When that time comes you may not be coherent enough to realize.

      My biggest fear is being incapacitated via a major stroke, boxed in and heroic efforts taken to keep me alive. I do have a very detailed advance directive in place, so that I will at least go fairly quickly in that event.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re: Troll bait by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

      What makes you think they aren't doing that already?

    9. Re:Troll bait by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Do you really think Facebook doesn't already scan private messages to build up your advertising profile and to look for banned content like child pornography?

      I doubt lawsuits will get very far - an entirely computer generated notice along the lines of "if you feel suicidal, you can call XXX-XXX-XXX to talk to someone" is going to fail tests for invasion of privacy and not exactly play well with a jury that can see Facebook is trying to do the right thing.

      If you want that level of privacy there are plenty of end-to-end encrypted channels.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re: Troll bait by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can see this play out in the USA.

      Guy is detected about to commit suicide. Police is sent.

      Police first shoot guy's dog, then the guy.

      Circle of life...

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    11. Re:Troll bait by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I doubt lawsuits will get very far - an entirely computer generated notice along the lines of "if you feel suicidal, you can call XXX-XXX-XXX to talk to someone" is going to fail tests for invasion of privacy

      Sigh. Even TFS outright says "or contact local first-responders." Calling the cops on you because you might be suicidal is never the right thing to do, especially since there is a significant chance that the cops will just show up and murder you, even if people are standing by begging them not to.

      and not exactly play well with a jury that can see Facebook is trying to do the right thing.

      You mean "believe that" Facebook is trying to do the right thing, because they are not.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Troll bait by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, the lawsuits come soon and will be painful -- FB should be a communication tool and not snoop on the content of non-public (i.e. privacy set to anything but "public") communications.

      Let's also remember this action by FB stems from the Won't-Someone-Think-Of-The-Children crowd, who is also likely to sue...for not thinking of the children.

      It's sad when bad parenting is so easily excused by throwing blame and litigation at everything but a mirror.

    13. Re:Troll bait by gnick · · Score: 1

      FB should be a communication tool and not snoop on the content of non-public (i.e. privacy set to anything but "public") communications.

      That made me chuckle. Anything you post to FB, you're volunteering to them. It will be mined and used 'against' you. Your job is to sit back and get injected, inspected, detected, infected, neglected and selected. Just keep feeding them info while they perfect their 'b0s0z0ku' model. It's not really snooping if they tell you up front that you're the product.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    14. Re:Troll bait by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You could be right. I underestimated just how fucked up the US is, especially the cops.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Troll bait by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      If you want that level of privacy there are plenty of end-to-end encrypted channels.

      If you want ANY level of privacy, then you shouldn't be using facebook in the first place.
      At least suicide prevention is a mostly non-evil use for their massive profiling.
      And if you are using the end-to-end encrypted channel to connect to facebook then it's pretty much like sanitizing a straw to drink out of a toilet.

    16. Re:Troll bait by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      Not too recently i read some article about a doctor sending the police to someones home b/c of a post of one his patients on facebook worrying him ... And also something about one of those smart things you can talk to (OMG THE INNOVATION) but it looks cool with a nifty name calling the cops cos there was a bit of a quarrel going on in the house I can imagine me and some of my exes having one of those (equals L M A O) so , now facebook gets to send the whitejackets to your house ? I knew i had to quit all those years ago and nothing has proven me wrong so far o m f g ... super-A.I. google this week detected "author restricted content" or whatever it calls it in a few videos ... most just had music playing in the background while i was recording ... which means like if the windows open and someone walks by , they hear a song im playing from a cd they havent bought then the mafiAAbrainBAFsaddampolice gets to come to my house and plaster ads on the wall i guess. The funniest one however was a recording of a gamesession of gridrunner (ancient yak-psychedelics) where i got a notice too on some guy named "Popov" stating i used his song in my video . Which i did, because it was the soundtrack of the very game i was recording while playing ... WHICH I BOUGHT ... so i think i bought the song too actually so either this popov is a douchefap or google a.i. is better at Go than checking videos anyway ... that's harmless ... sending unasked for help to your door ?
      how intrusive can you get ? more reasons not to get back on facebook

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  2. How about no? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are going to be some serious privacy issues and a lot of false positives. If all goes according to plan, expect the cops to send a SWAT team to bust down someone's door and "accidentally" pump two dozen bullets into them...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:How about no? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      expect the cops to send a SWAT team to bust down someone's door and "accidentally" pump two dozen bullets into them

      There has to be better ways to stop someone from killing himself.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:How about no? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Informative

      American cops and injustice system be like...

      "We'll kill/incarcerate the fuck out of you to save you."

      Remember, we're the country that locks up the most people for what they choose to take into their own bodies. We also used to lock up or kill people for their choice of partners -- wrong color was almost a capital offense in many parts of the country.

      Don't underestimate the stupidity and brutality of the American criminal injustice system.

    3. Re:How about no? by geekmux · · Score: 2

      There are going to be some serious privacy issues and a lot of false positives. If all goes according to plan, expect the cops to send a SWAT team to bust down someone's door and "accidentally" pump two dozen bullets into them...

      Let's remember what S.W.A.T. stands for, in order to understand what justifies their presence.

      An individual being flagged for suicidal thoughts does not qualify as a SWAT-level threat, nor would they have trained staff to properly handle it.

    4. Re:How about no? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Some states had laws making suicide a felony, and some up until the 1990s. If you survived, you could theoretically go to jail for attempted murder of yourself.

      I guess that by that logic, the police would be justified in shooting your murderer. You'd die anyhow, but the crime would be prevented.

    5. Re: How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...we can also find the psychopaths and roll SWAT for a quick chat.

      My first thought based on some earlier comments: "Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself."

    6. Re:How about no? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Can anyone confirm that in the US the response to a potentially suicidal person is a SWAT team?!

      In most places it's considered a medical emergency. If any law enforcement is involved it will only be to help medical personnel gain access to the patient. In this case the first response would probably be calling the phone number that the user supplied to Facebook.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:How about no? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2
      Can anyone confirm that in the US the response to a potentially suicidal person is a SWAT team?!

      No. That was what they call a "joke". In moderately bad taste....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    8. Re:How about no? by Kiuas · · Score: 2

      There are going to be some serious privacy issues and a lot of false positives. If all goes according to plan, expect the cops to send a SWAT team to bust down someone's door and "accidentally" pump two dozen bullets into them

      If the cops respond to a suspected suicidal person with a SWAT-team, then the AI reporting to them about a suicidal individual is the least of your problems.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    9. Re:How about no? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      At least two people modded it insightful...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re: How about no? by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Just the smart ones, dum dum!

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    11. Re:How about no? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Can anyone confirm that in the US the response to a potentially suicidal person is a SWAT team?!

      It doesn't take SWAT to show up and murder an innocent. The "normal" cops manage to do that all the goddamned time. There's something like that in the news about every month, and that's just the ones that are happening to someone sufficiently mediagenic to bother reporting upon.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In England, it is the responsibility of the police to deal with reports of suicidal people. They will talk to the person reported or self-reporting as suicidal, take them home if not already at home, and they will try to arrange for someone they know to keep them company without involving health services, collecting them if needed.

      It is only if the person is refusing to comply or will be left alone or has already caused themselves physical damage that they'll consider calling in a medical professional (of which 3 with specific training are required in England for sectioning).

      This has a positive aspect, namely that they don't start dragging in an army of strangers to the likely already terrified person's location unless needed, but also a very obvious negative aspect, namely that you can have an actively suicidal person processed with absolutely zero involvement from a healthcare professional.

      The underlying problem is that, since the H&SWA 2012, there is no longer comprehensive mental healthcare in the UK, nor a duty for the state to provide it.

    13. Re: How about no? by tsqr · · Score: 1

      ...we can also find the psychopaths and roll SWAT for a quick chat.

      My first thought based on some earlier comments: "Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself."

      "Idiot" and "member of Congress" should be flipped. As is, you are implying that all idiots are members of Congress.

      Read it again, carefully, and think about it for 30 seconds. If you still think it's wrong, you should write an angry letter to Mark Twain's estate.

  3. They needed to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're just attempting to get ahead of things because they know damn well at some point someone is going to do some research and show how many suicides Facebook actually CAUSES. Legally, they can say they are taking all the reasonable measures possible to prevent it.

    1. Re:They needed to do this by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      Facebook already admitted to conducting experiments on manipulating user emotions. Developing AI to accurately detect if someone is depressed would make sense as they would need to be able to determine how effective their methods are.

  4. I wonder if they ever considered.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they have ever considered that some people may be suicidal precisely because of this impersonal, constantly surveilled machine the modern internet has thrust upon everyone which gives the illusion of caring ("getting suicidal people the help they need, faster than ever before!") without actually giving a shit.

    Maybe what we need isn't even more ways to present the illusion of being connected without really being so. Maybe what we need is actual deeper, meaningful human interaction.

    Frankly, the world these people seem to want: algorithms constantly analysing and monetizing everything everyone ever does - is enough to drive many people into depression.

  5. False positives? by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Can I sue Facebook for bunchteen million dollars if they report a false positive?

  6. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    How super can this bowl really be if people keep losing it?

    Just buy another one!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  7. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Yep, I over-estimated the IQ of the average US cop. Maybe they'll do it in Canada, though.

  8. Does it actually work? by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was under the impression that people who are actually suicidal don't often post about it on Facebook. If you really want to kill yourself, bringing more attention to yourself isn't a good way to accomplish this. Don't get me wrong, the petty narcissists that try to get attention by acting suicidal clearly need help as well, but I don't think this will do much to deter those who are actually suicidal.

    If Facebook really cared about the mental health and wellbeing of their users, they'd kick people off after more than fifteen minutes of daily use or just outright pull the plug on the whole works.

    1. Re:Does it actually work? by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, but most people who are suicdal do not genuinely want to die as much as they would rather want their living circumstances just to be different from whatever they are

    2. Re:Does it actually work? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      True, but most people who are suicdal do not genuinely want to die as much as they would rather want their living circumstances just to be different from whatever they are

      How do you know? I think quite a few people would like a better life than what they have but still would prefer no life, and quite a few others are rationally certain that different living circumstances would in all likelihood be worse than what they have. Especially if they also have to pay huge psychiatric bills, which is the likely outcome of seeking help.

      There's also quite a bit of begging the question in modern pseudo-psychology, where people are now conditioned to think that those who try to kill themselves suffer from a mental illness, and they know this because they try to kill themselves.

      I think we need to get rid of the suicide stigma, and allow people to do what they want with their own lives, including ending it. Without no interference from well-meaning people who prolong other's suffering or discomfort to feed their own moral beliefs. Let people die with dignity, not shame.

    3. Re:Does it actually work? by TheSync · · Score: 1

      There's also quite a bit of begging the question in modern pseudo-psychology, where people are now conditioned to think that those who try to kill themselves suffer from a mental illness, and they know this because they try to kill themselves.

      The facts is that nearly 50% of suicides are due to clinical depression. Those suffering from depression are at 25 times greater risk for suicide than the general population.

         

    4. Re:Does it actually work? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      How do you know? I think quite a few people would like a better life than what they have but still would prefer no life

      I felt that way after my wife died. My religion kept me from being actively suicidal (fear of hell and all of that). That said, I did not communicate this on facebook or any social medium. I had no desire for the publicity, felt shame, and did not want others feeling responsible if something did happen to me. I also didn't want to possibly die in an accident and have everyone assume I had killed myself. Not the legacy I wanted for my kids.

      Many years have now passed and there are many times where I feel numb to life but I am glad I am alive for my kids sake and even for my own.

      Suicide should have a stigma. It is permanent. At the very least, there should be a 5 year pre-registration.

    5. Re:Does it actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Suicidally depressed people are convinced there is no way things can possibly get better, so even if you suggest a plausible better alternative it is immediately dismissed because the person is feeling so miserable and emotion robs reason.

    6. Re:Does it actually work? by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Suicidally depressed people are convinced there is no way things can possibly get better, so even if you suggest a plausible better alternative it is immediately dismissed because the person is feeling so miserable and emotion robs reason.

      Absolutely true... but my point is only that they would generally still prefer to live a life in better circumstances than to actually die, and genuinely unusual for someone to simply wish themselves to be dead as a preference to simply having a better life circumstance, however impossible it might be for them to imagine.

      And given that, it is possible, although not necessarily certain, that a person who is suicidal and therefore generally just wants an improvement to their circumstance, but in absence of any hope that such a thing can be achieved, seek to end their existence as they currently experience it can be helped... that possibly, with such help, they can get past whatever has brought them to that point, and find a life that is actually worth living for.

      As it was mentioned before, the people who do really want to kill themselves don't bother to tell anybody about it.. But as I said, this is not typical for people with seriously suicidal thoughts, which can often take several weeks or months to escalate to that point, and there are often outward indications that could be visible to people that are in that person's social circle and life if they knew what to look for.

    7. Re: Does it actually work? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

      FB exec: "Millions of our countrymen are being literally driven mad by capitalism. How can we profit from this?"

    8. Re:Does it actually work? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      If Facebook really cared about the mental health and wellbeing of their users, they'd kick people off after more than fifteen minutes of daily use or just outright pull the plug on the whole works.

      This tends to highlight why Greed N. Corruption is the CEO of Capitalist America.

      Nothing else matters, no matter how damaging.

    9. Re:Does it actually work? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Many years have now passed and there are many times where I feel numb to life but I am glad I am alive for my kids sake and even for my own.

      But you did not make the choice to kill yourself, which puts you in a different category from those who did.

      Suicide should have a stigma. It is permanent. At the very least, there should be a 5 year pre-registration.

      Who gave you a right to decide what's right for others?
      Of course it is permanent. That's the whole point.
      Being dead is painless and without remorse. Regrets are for the living; the dead are completely unaffected.

    10. Re:Does it actually work? by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      One just needs to look at how Jordan Peterson was treated by the SJW controlled social media to understand that using AI to punish thoughtcrime and stifle dissent is inevitable. The corporations that assume the role as institutions in society will dictate the terms for our participation as merely being something as simple as trying to appease a complex and obfuscated algorithm.

      To get a glimpse of this wonderful future waiting for us, have a look at what China is already doing with their own social credit system, that will punish you for dissent.

    11. Re:Does it actually work? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      By having felt suicidal, dumbass.

      You're assuming feeling suicidal and committing suicide is the same thing. The difference is as big as between attracted to a woman and jumping her bones.

      but you can just look at the number of people dying to understand it will not be unusual to encounter someone at risk

      "At risk"? That's presuming that it's something to be avoided. You don't know that beforehand. As you yourself say:

      know for certain that not everyone's experience is like your own.

      That's exactly my point. One person's risk, another person's chance.

    12. Re: Does it actually work? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      A person who is rich and successful and wanting to kill themselves is probably suffering from clinical depression rather than situational depression. Situational depression is actually much more common, and can manifest in having thoughts of suicide just as clinical depression might. The difference between them is that when the circumstances about which the person is depressed improve, or once they have had a chance to psychologically adapt to whatever life change caused them to become depressed in the first place, the desire to kill oneself also goes away. It needs to be taken no less seriously because it is just as possible for them to act on it as a clinically depressed person would.

  9. They put you through to their call center in India by boudie2 · · Score: 1

    Hello, this is Raj, I am understanding that you have feelings of suicide? Could you please confirm your email address and I will give you the numbers of a counselor who can make you feel better. Please hold the line.

  10. The synopsis says it will notify your FRIENDS?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I sincerely hope that the synopsis is incorrect, because it would be a massive violation of privacy if facebook just starts notifying random people in your social network that you've authoried a suicidal post - especially if, as it sounds like, they are looking at the content of posts that haven't even been submitted yet. Most depressed folks I know have enough suicidal episodes to have experienced writing a suicide note or three but end up using the writing of the note to work through the issue at hand and come back down enough to get over the worst of it or seek help on their own. I'd be enormously upset to discover that working my way through an episode like that resulted in some public announcement of my mental state by facebook. Granted, I'd never write such a thing in a text box on a live website, simply to avoid accidentally submitting or reloading, never mind snooping on unposting content by the site's owner, but others might be careless enough to get caught out.

  11. "AI" = "an algorithm" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since when has "AI" = "an algorithm"?

    Fucking buzzwords

    Add it to the list of cloud = internet, etc.

  12. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by raind · · Score: 1

    Or "I'll be dead or in jail if Obama wins"
    - Ted Nugent

    --
    Get up!
  13. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    The USSR was also well known for abuse of psychiatric incarceration.

  14. Clippy by IckySplat · · Score: 1

    It looks like you are trying to kill yourself.
    Would like help?

    --
    Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
  15. Lost my nephew today to suicide by burningcpu · · Score: 1

    My nephew committed suicide today. Several hours before, he posted a link on FB to the music video for "Logic - 1-800-273-8255."
    I don't have any wisdom to share, just the sadness.

    1. Re:Lost my nephew today to suicide by mccalli · · Score: 1

      My condolences to both yourself and to the rest of the family as well.

  16. Expectation vs Reality by n329619 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Expectation:

    Guy1: I've lost my job and my family in an accident on the same day. There's no hope anymore.

    FB: Looks like you need some help! Go visit Save.org today!

    Guy1: Thanks FB. It really helped.

    Reality:

    Guy2: Omg, this guy on the internet is so stupid. I am literally banging my head so hard that it's killing me.

    FB: Looks like you need some help! Go visit Save.org today!

    Guy2: Is this the part where I continue to bang my head?

    FB: Looks like you need some help! Go visit Save.org today!

    Guy2: Damn it. Stop spamming me. You're killing me.

    FB: Looks like you need some help! Go visit Save.org today!

    Person2: Arrrrrrugh!!! Do you want me dead or something?

    FB: We booked you a schedule on Suicide Prevention Lifeline. Thank you for using FB newest AI chatbot technology. This chatbot is sponsored by Nice-Long-Rope, the best $1.99 rope to hang things from the ceiling.

  17. What could possibly go wrong by Solandri · · Score: 4

    "Man commits suicide after becoming depressed that Facebook flagged his regular posts as suicidal."

    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Man commits suicide after becoming depressed that Facebook flagged his regular posts as suicidal."

      Man commits suicide after Facebook ruins his life by referring him to a state-sponsored mental health care system that thrives primarily on overprescription. But if Facebook wants more fake-ass posts that don't tell how people are really thinking, I guess this is one way to get them. I know that I will now fear Facebook referring me to some legal organization for "help", and adjust my posts accordingly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. Re: How long before it's used maliciously? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

    We have become the Soviet Union.

  19. Re: So now if I say I had a bad day at work... by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

    Maybe Facebook is worried that Reddit has the lead in the potentially lucrative Stasi collaboration market.

  20. Re: Oh, great. by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Feeling glum? Your good friends at Facebook are going to help you by sending uniformed thugs to kick your ass and throw you in a cage!

  21. Re: THIS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He's saying your kids are braindead.

  22. Re:I see good things coming out of this by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

    Nothing good ever came from facebook. Nothing.

  23. It's not about prevention by shortscruffydave · · Score: 1

    It's so FB can sell your friends targeted advertising from funeral directors and florists

    1. Re:It's not about prevention by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 1

      So they can send in a SWAT team to neutralize you before you can harm yourself.

      --
      sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
  24. Re:THIS. by Kiuas · · Score: 2

    Seriously, get the fuck off of ANY non-face-to-face human interaction every once in a while.

    The problem with social media (not just FB) and depression is not that people do nothing but stare at FB and get depressed. The problem (or, one of them) is that if you're already depressed, viewing social media can make it worse. Why? Well, because people like to present their best side on social media; people's profiles are by and large advertisements of themselves. People post about their holidays, trips, happy times with friends and family, If you're someone who feels shitty about your life, browsing the feed can make these feelings even worse because it seems to highlight to you how much better everyone else is doing and hence how much of a 'failure' you are because you don't have these kinds of situations.

    So yeah, staying out of FB can be a good thing during depression, but it carries the downside of isolating one even more from one's social circle. For me and you it's easy to call up a friend and go grab a beer or a coffee out in the real world, but for a depressed person who might have trouble just getting out of bed this can be a monumental task, so just telling these people to log out of FB and go out is not exactly a miracle solution.

    What FB could do if they get this working is change the feed of depressed people slightly. I mean, they already embed ads into the feed, so for these individuals embedding information and resources about getting help as well as possible articles/videos about how to deal with depression while also simulatenously toning down the amount of other people's 'look at my awesome day out on a date with my girlfriend' -posts would likely be a good thing.

    --
    "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
  25. False positives? by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 1

    I somehow get the feeling that this will probably go just as well as youtube's automatic flagging and de-monetization of videos that has completely baffled independent content creators (traditional media ones like CNN and the BBC are excluded from this system) with the way it's arbitrarily de-monetized massive amounts of completely benign content.

    However what worries me even more is if they try their hand using the same flagging scripts for flagging other things. I probably ought to remove the post I made yesterday about the seemingly extremely quick delivery of something I ordered online where I joked about it probably being the fastest delivery since that German guy* tried to get the British Post Office to start delivering "V2 style" using rockets. Because if I don't I get the feeling they may put me on a list of "known neo-nazis" or something.

    *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerhard_Zucker

    --
    "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
  26. Re:But they can't stop illegal racial housing???? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    If I put up job postings in a white neighborhood and a black guy comes in looking for a job, I only break the law if I deny him on basis of his race. That can be difficult to prove, but the demographics of my postings can be used as evidence despite being perfectly legal.

    If you only hang fliers in a white neighborhood, black people can still come into that neighborhood and see them, at least in this era. If you explicitly select not to show your ad to anyone but white people, on the other hand, that's substantially different and clearly an attempt at discrimination. It's difficult to prove you were only trying to rent to whites if you post flyers in a white neighborhood, because you can reasonably claim that you were attracted by the economic status of the neighborhood. It's difficult to prove you were only trying to rent to whites if you post an ad on a website frequented mostly by white people, too. But it's trivial to prove that you were trying to exclude non-whites if you actually selected "show this ad only to white people".

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. for the "profits of psychiatry." by strstr · · Score: 1

    basically the way this is supposed to work: Facebook detects the billable mental disorder and reports you to authorities for forcibly psychiatric lock up. The hospital/doctors then bill your insurance against your will, prescribing drugs that disable your brain and create mental illness for reals, permanently making you disabled. Doctors/hospital/investors in the pharma company/congressman walk away with a mint at the victims expense.
    Psychiatry isn't treatment it's a business model.

    https://www.trumpsweapon.com/

  28. Slippery slope? by houghi · · Score: 1

    They start with suicide; Next it will be helping people that are depressed or have PTSD. Then it will be people who are unahappy. So where do you draw the line as to when to stop?
    On the one side they do not allow Russians to advertise for whatever party they want to. On the other hand, I am sure they will take money from companies to influence the peoples behavior of what they buy.

    Some quotes from THX 1138 that could be relevant:
    Thou art a subject of the divine, created in the image of man, by the masses, for the masses.

    Female voice (medicine cabinet): If you feel you are not properly sedated, call 348-844 immediately. Failure to do so may result in prosecution for criminal drug evasion.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Slippery slope? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not even sure how you imagine them taking action against unhappy people. Like, if someone's suicidal, Facebook can call the cops and say "This person is clearly suicidal, send help." But if you call the cops and tell them "This person is unhappy," they'll laugh and say "Cool. Call back when you have a real emergency."

      Bollocks.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  29. What about terrorism pre-crime? Domestic violence? by IHTFISP · · Score: 1

    Sounds like naïve emotionalistic public relations propaganda to me. “We detect & report pre-crime!”

    If it were really that simple to detect suicidal tendencies, wouldn't FB also announce efforts to detect/prevent:
    * terrorist attacks
    * domestic abuse
    * human trafficking
    * illegal drug trade
    * illegal border crossings
    * tax evasion
    * racism
    * blasphemy
    * insults against the State
    * thoughtcrime
    * impure thoughts
    * sarcasm

    Etc. What a bunch o' hooey!

    They might well intend this as a “cover our arses” defense against suicide liability suits, but it opens the door to a plethora of other suits if they don't also address a host of other comparable issues. The unintended consequences could be epically Orwellian.

    All in all: this appears to be a bad idea poorly implemented, a.k.a. activist government policy pandering.

    --
    Error: NSE - No Signature Error
  30. Re:I see good things coming out of this by PPH · · Score: 1

    drama queens

    The sort of people that emacs psychiatrist would just say, "kys".

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  31. AI to become suicidal by Migraineman · · Score: 1

    I would expect the AI to become suicidal having been forced to wade through umpteen million posts about "what I'm currently eating," regurgitated cute-cat videos, and various flavors of tween- and teen-drama.

    AI: "Oh god, not ANOTHER bathroom selfie ..."

  32. Re:THIS. by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

    Or tweak the algo to show the depressed the negative stuff other people post [there's is always negative stuff]. So, hopefully they'll realize that there are people as unhappy as they are. That should work if the problem is the perceived good life other people live.

    This would be a VERY difficult thing to get right. Yes, if you're miserable and see everyone else is happy, this can possibly make you feel worse but so can seeing a bunch of depressing posts from everyone. Ideally what you would probably want to show is posts of people overcoming difficulties but it would likely be hard to find this thread consistently.

  33. another lens for the global panopticon by cas2000 · · Score: 1

    this will surely be welcomed by those whose despair and depression is caused by the stress of living in the panopticon of an ever-increasing surveillance state that makes Orwell seem like a naive optimist.