Slashdot Mirror


After Two Months of Quiet, North Korea Launches Another Ballistic Missile (arstechnica.com)

South Korean and U.S. officials have confirmed that North Korea has launched another ballistic missile into the sea of Japan. The ballistic missile test -- launched just after 3am Wednesday local time from Sin-ni in South Pyongyang -- is the first since an intermediate-range missile test in September. Ars Technica reports: In a statement to the press, a spokesperson for South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said, "North Korea fired an unidentified ballistic missile early this morning from Pyongsong, South Pyongan [Province], to the east direction. South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff is analyzing more details of the missile with the U.S. side." The U.S. Department of Defense and the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) have made an initial assessment that the missile was an ICBM, according to Office of the Secretary of Defense spokesperson Col. Robert Manning. The missile traveled 1,000 kilometers, flew over Japan, and landed in the sea east of Japan within its exclusive economic zone.

6 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Let Japan settle ... by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not their "jurisdiction". It is their neighborhood. But any conflict they get into is also our conflict, due to our commitment to their security.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  2. Re:Let Japan settle ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1, Informative

    "ignorant?"

    Did NK violate Japanese airspace or not?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  3. Re:Let Japan settle ... by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are being deliberately obtuse. The US is bound by treaty to defend Japan. If you didn't know that before, you certainly do after reading my last comment. Treaties have the force of law. So any security problem for Japan is a security problem for the US, even if you neglect the thousands of US troops stationed in (drumroll) Japan.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  4. This missile is an SS18. It can hit DC or New York by schwit1 · · Score: 4, Informative
    With that the NORKS don't need to miniaturize the warhead. The SS18 is a massive missile.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...

  5. Re:Let Japan settle ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

    North Korea has no diplomatic relations with Japan, nor is it interesting in "settling" any issue at all with Japan.

    That's not correct. Japan has been discussing the issue of kidnappings for decades, and NK has made some quite considerable concessions. There is also a small population of NK citizens living in Japan, with a school and some NGOs based in Tokyo.

    Japan is one of the major routes in to NK for visitors too. NK likes to host international sporting events like the Pyongyang marathon, with Japanese athletes competing and Japan acting as a gateway for travel.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  6. Re:Okay sure, but... by wjcofkc · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not that simple. There are posts in this thread that claim knowledge of Japan being able to make a bunch of nukes overnight. Not to mention a home grown nuke needs to be tested, and courtesy of the test ban treaty, they can only be tested underground. Japan does not have a whole lot of "underground". Not to mention the potential of waking up Godzilla.

    Seriously though, the US would never give Japan a bunch ICBM tipped nukes in silos. The international insanity that would follow would make the current international climate pale in comparison. So the Japanese Defense Force is technically a military, but Japan has no Army. The entirety of their military infrastructure is geared specifically towards defensive measures. While in light of the escalating NK program there is talk in Japan of changing this, but reorganizing their military is also not something that can happen overnight.

    I suggest looking into the "Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan". If fact there is a lot of contextual history and subjects like the "San Francisco System" and the "Yoshida Doctrine" the last of which is still largely applicable today.

    Rather than writing a whole research paper in a post, I am going to leave it there for you to research. I imagine people will read this post and try to call me out on "this and that has changed, and then there is this and that". I am aware of these things. The bottom line is we have an overwhelming military force in Japan for a reason. We protect Japan, for better or worse. It really is all very complicated.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.