Slashdot Mirror


China's Dark Matter Probe Detects Tantalizing Signal (sciencemag.org)

hackingbear shares a report from Science Magazine: Results reported by a China-led space science mission provide a tantalizing hint -- but not firm evidence -- for dark matter. In its first 530 days of scientific observations, China's Dark Matter Particle Explorer (DAMPE) detected 1.5 million cosmic ray electrons and positrons above a certain energy threshold. When researchers plot of the number of particles against their energy, they saw hints of an anomalous break in the curve. Now, DAMPE has confirmed that deviation. "It may be evidence of dark matter," but the break in the curve "may be from some other cosmic ray source," says astrophysicist Chang Jin, who leads the collaboration at the Chinese Academy of Science's Purple Mountain Observatory in Nanjing. DAMPE's life span will be extended to 5 years given the excellent conditions of this Chinese spacecraft, then it can record over 10 billion cosmic events, allowing researchers to confirm if it is indeed dark matter. Perhaps more significantly, the first observational data produced by China's first mission dedicated to astrophysics shows that the country is set to become a force in space science, says David Spergel, an astrophysicist at Princeton University. China is now "making significant contributions to astrophysics and space science," he says. The DAMPE results appear online in the journal Nature.

8 of 37 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Statistical significance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    More details here:
    http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/First_finding_of_Chinas_DAMPE_may_shed_light_on_dark_matter_research_999.html
    "DAMPE has directly detected a spectral break at ~0.9 TeV, with the spectral index changing from ~3.1 to ~3.9."
    This is pretty energetic stuff for Electrons and Positrons. I don't think that they have released anything significant about the Photons or heavier Nuclei yet.

    Can I make a little joke about China's Purple Mountain's Majesties now?

    Oh, I thought not... you folks are enough to DAMPEn anything.

  2. Good job China by Dorianny · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well this is exciting. The results considerably narrows the parameter space for nearby astronomical sources that can account for the PAMELA positron anomaly. It also puts new constrains on theoretical models for proposed dark-matter candidates. Of course it is still entirely possible that all that comes out of this is the discovery of a nearby pulsar

    1. Re:Good job China by gtall · · Score: 2

      Under the assumption the research is correct.

  3. Re:The Math? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, the 1.5M was strikes ABOVE THE THRESHOLD, it doesn't say the total collected then.

  4. Tanatalizing signal! is it the Typical Signal ? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Interesting
    During the cold war the Swedish navy had underwater listening posts that detected suspicious signals that could be Russian subs. These Swedish subs kept trying to catch the Red Subs red handed, but to no avail. They kept following the "typical signal" that sounded like bcaon being fried in a skillet noise.

    Eventually, once biologists came on board to listen, they found the source of the signals.

    Farting Fish Fingered said the Guardian.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Tanatalizing signal! is it the Typical Signal ? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Eventually, the Communists caught themselves. A Whiskey-class submarine stuck itself on a rock, well within Swedish territorial waters. The incident was known as "Whiskey on the rocks". Instead of taking a strong stand, the Swedes allowed the submarine to go freely.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  5. Re:scale wrong? by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 3, Insightful

    or is this a case of a reporting mistake

    No it is a case of not reading the fucking article.

    In its first 530 days of scientific observations, DAMPE detected 1.5 million cosmic ray electrons and positrons above a certain energy threshold.

  6. Re:Statistical significance? by SpaceIsBig · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's the open access article on arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.109... I don't think they determined the statistical significance