Slashdot Mirror


Quentin Tarantino and JJ Abrams Team Up For 'Star Trek' Movie (hollywoodreporter.com)

Quentin Tarantino reportedly has a pitch for a Star Trek film, and he has shared his vision with J.J. Abrams. According to Hollywood Reporter, "Tarantino and Abrams have plans to bring together a writers room to develop a film at Star Trek studio Paramount. Tarantino has an eye to direct the potential project." From the report: Abrams rebooted the franchise with 2009's Star Trek and also helmed 2013's Star Trek Into Darkness, before pivoting to Lucasfilm's Star Wars: The Force Awakens. He remains a producer on the Star Trek franchise even as he readies 2019's Star Wars: Episode IX. Paramount previously stated it was developing a fourth Star Trek film to star Chris Hemsworth as Captain Kirk's (Chris Pine) father, but no director has been attached and it's unclear where this Tarantino development leaves the project. The latest installment, Justin Lin's Star Trek Beyond (2016), was well-liked by critics but earned just $343.4 million worldwide, the lowest in the rebooted universe. In a 2015 Nerdist podcast interview, Tarantino revealed that he would be more likely to direct a Star Trek film over a Star Wars pic, noting he was a big fan of the original series.

39 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. Does Kirk LOOK like a BITCH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Say "Dilithium" one more god damned time!

  2. Sound in page by qortra · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1. 1. Click on link
    2. 2. Immediately video starts playing back with sound
    3. 3. Leave page because fuck that.

    Can anybody suggest a good plugin that will ban sites that do that shit? I don't even want to show up in their daily-active-user count.

    1. Re:Sound in page by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      Ghostery blocks all that stuff.

    2. Re:Sound in page by FrankHaynes · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's a setting buried in the Firefox "about:config" tree that stops autoplay of videos/media, but I don't remember what it's named right now. Search around there long enough you'll find it.

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    3. Re:Sound in page by lgw · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's probably something that could be done with your ... hosts file [wince].

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:Sound in page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      media.autoplay.enabled

    5. Re:Sound in page by deep2k · · Score: 2

      Can anybody suggest a good plugin that will ban sites that do that shit? I don't even want to show up in their daily-active-user count.

      On any chrome-based browser: chrome://flags then scroll down to Autoplay policy and select "Document user activation is required"

  3. Good movies, Terrible Star Trek by Excelcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    JJ Treks are good movies, but terrible Star Trek. He took the original series, movies, animated series, and a few books put them in a blender and hit Frappe. What pops out is Star Trek for people with no attention span - it's like Star Trek Anime. The action sequences are ok, and as a turn off your brain light sci fi, I have to admit they are enjoyable. But they aren't Star Trek. JJ did the same with Star Wars, just took the original stories and recycled them with little innovation and nothing new. It's sad to see Trek raped that way.

    1. Re:Good movies, Terrible Star Trek by FrankHaynes · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not Star Trek. It's a totally different movie that rips off the same character names to draw in long-time fans, but it's not recognizable to them. Fuck Abrams and his money grab.

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    2. Re:Good movies, Terrible Star Trek by JohnFen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      JJ Treks are good movies, but terrible Star Trek.

      A million times this. Abrams is precisely the wrong person to be making Star Trek movies. I find them aggressively objectionable.

      If, however, you took the same movies and didn't connect them to Star Trek, then they'd by OK. Not great, but fine.

    3. Re: Good movies, Terrible Star Trek by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's different when it's a single (two-part) episode compared to a feature film. "Tin Man", "Hollow Pursuits" and "Sarek" (all high on character development) were all at the end of season three, just before BoBW. "Family" immediately followed.

      I don't think much of the TNG movies after Generations; they're just shoot-em-ups, with Worf (and Data) in comic foil roles. The Abrams movies are action movies wearing a Star Trek mask.

    4. Re:Good movies, Terrible Star Trek by Tailhook · · Score: 2

      too clean

      Tarantino can probably help with that part. Give him some play and the finale will be a seedy hold in the bottom of some pirate space ship filled with sacks of space dope and a bunch of astonished, half naked female bad persons that blast each into bloody chunks spinning in zero g, all in slow motion.

      Sounds like a plan.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    5. Re:Good movies, Terrible Star Trek by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      It'll be interesting to see what futuristic space racial slurs Tarantino invents to pepper the dialogue with.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  4. Another Spoiler Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Star Trek is very liberal. You can count on Chekov being arrested in the movie and accused of meddling in electing the next president of the Federation.

    1. Re: Another Spoiler Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Khan!!!!!

    2. Re:Another Spoiler Alert! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      They could bring on a certain Pavla Chekova and claim she had a genetic sex change. That ticks almost all the boxes!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Another Spoiler Alert! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2

      Walter Koenig in drag. Put him blackface too, and I honestly can't see how we can't end up making bank from the diversity crowd.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    4. Re:Another Spoiler Alert! by BBF_BBF · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Quentin will do anything he can to put Uma Thurman into his movies. ;-)

  5. Johnny Depp by weedjams · · Score: 2

    will make a great Yoda.

  6. Captain Jules Winnfield by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am 100% behind Quentin Tarantino directing Star Trek if it means Samuel L. Jackson will be playing the captain of the Enterprise with a jheri curl.

    "I said...BEAM ME UP MOTHERFUCKER!"

    https://youtu.be/9wEnb9yIoes

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Captain Jules Winnfield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Vulcan, motherfucker. Do you speak it?"

    2. Re:Captain Jules Winnfield by Jahoda · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was actually thinking more along the lines of "SAY KHAN AGAIN"

    3. Re:Captain Jules Winnfield by burtosis · · Score: 2

      I've had it with these mothafuckin' tribbles, on this mothafuckin' ship! Everybody strap in, I'm about to open some fuckin' windows!"

      Yep, I'd watch that movie.

  7. Despise both these directors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I must be severely out of step with my generation, but I despise both these guys and with the amount their films gets rubbed in my face, it's with a passion.

    Now I'm a Trek fan that hates nuTrek, this is like a double whammy of crappiness, where nuTrek delves even deeper into mindless action. I didn't think it was possible.

    1. Re:Despise both these directors by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      I love tarintino but tend to agree. Nothing about this makes sense.

      It may be interesting to see him completely outside of his wheelhouse though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Despise both these directors by SethJohnson · · Score: 2

      I hung out with Tarantino for about a week in the early 2000s. Every night there was an extremely attractive blonde who would show up at the theater and arrange to sit right next to him. She brought her headshot and would forcefully flirt with him constantly. Tarantino politely blew off her advances and referred her to his agent. He was exceptionally nice about the whole thing and never hinted at trying to take advantage of the power dynamic.

      In all other respects, Quentin Tarantino can be a social goof, but I would be very surprised if he was accused of sexual misconduct. His biggest fault is turning a blind eye to his pals Harvey Weinstein and Robert Rodriguez. In this regards, he has been an enabler.

      As for this Star Trek gig, I am hopeful that Quentin Tarantino will helm the project. Abrams success in Hollywood is largely due to his ability to draw consensus among producers in their formulaic demands on big ticket franchise productions. Tarantino works at a much smaller budget and will minimize his debt to producers trying to mold his vision to their money-making formulas. This approach will mean stripped down production values and emphasis on plot and characters- ala TOS.

  8. Fuck it. by wjcofkc · · Score: 2

    Let's do it.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  9. Good by sexconker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is good, because I don't plan on watching it.

    Everything JayJay touches is shit. Everything Quentin touches is over the top and ridiculous not for any point, not for any stylistic effect, and not even for the sake of being over the top or gratuitous, but simply so you will know Quentin is behind it.

    1. Re:Good by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Man you must be fun at parties.

  10. Let Quentin Tarantino do one or two by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Then have John Woo do the next couple after that. Too bad Peckinpah isn't around, though.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  11. Re:Slashdot bigots will appear shortly by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    Star Trek as a social development indicator is totally pointless because the self-describe "most progressive" people would shudder at the thought of an actual 24th century society in exactly the same way the 16th century people would be shocked by visiting us.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  12. Dialogue I want to hear by ngc5194 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here are some lines of dialogue I want to hear from this movie:

    Being 1: "You know what they call a Quarter Pounder with cheese on Qonos?"
    Being 2: "They don't call it a Quarter Pounder with cheese?"
    Being 1: "No man, they have a different system of measurement in the Klingon Empire, they use kellicams to measure distance and shit."
    Being 2: "Then what do they call it?"
    Being 1: "It's a loQ cheb with cheese, only they don't eat it with cheese. Klingons don't like cheese because it doesn't move."
    Being 2: "LoQ cheb with cheese. What do they call a Big Mac?"
    Being 1: "A Big Mac's a Big Mac, but they serve it with a side of gagh."

  13. Tarantino Trek by seoras · · Score: 2

    Things to look out for when Tarantino boldly goes where no director has gone before:
      - Mexican stand off in space.
      - "N" word. Has it been abolished a few hundred years from now?
      - Samuel L. Jackson goes from Jedi to Klingon
      - Uma. In spandex. Paying homage to Duran Duran.
      - The resurrection of a long forgotten film star.

    Add some of your own below.

  14. Re:another slashdot loser by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    with a hollow meaningless life, whose only joy comes from getting exploited by hollywood

    What can I say? I am a simple man. But at least I was able to figure out how to get a Slashdot account.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  15. It's over: Star Trek as a genre is DEAD. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's total chaos, it's unwatchable, and it's time to just admit it: It's dead, Jim. It's all artificially Star Trek-flavored, complete with trans-fats, FD&C Red #2, and NutraSweet, and a mandatory carcinogen warning label if sold in California.

  16. It physically can't be any worse than ST:D by Noishkel · · Score: 2

    Because ST:D is literally one of the worse Sci-Fi series in years. Super charged lens flare laden Abrams quality CGI for the first two episodes only but absolutely garbage in every other way. Not that Trek has ever had the best writing, but Discovery makes Enterprise look like TNG by comparison.

  17. NoScript by JBMcB · · Score: 2

    Blocks all of that crap. I once loaded a news site I frequent in another browser and laughed at all of the garbage that popped up and ate up screen real estate. With NoScript the site doesn't look as pretty but it's far more usable.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  18. To be fair... by JBMcB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... like any genre, most anime is pretty bad. I noticed this back when it was really taking off in the US. I used to go to a monthly anime screening at a college near me and they'd show a couple of decent movies and a few episodes of a good TV series all hand-subtitled by the Japanese club's members. After a few years it devolved into, maybe, one decent movie or OVA, and a slew of shlocky romantic comedy, high school students fighting demons, or DBZ knockoff TV shows. The last screening I went to they played a few episodes from three different TV series that were all vampire high school romantic drama/comedies. I gave them a chance and, except for a few scenes of well done animation that I'm sure ate up most of their budgets, they were all garbage.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  19. Quit Screwing Around by Shogun37 · · Score: 2

    Abrams? Tarentino? Let's stop playing around and go straight to the bottom of the barrel. if we're going to hire talentless hacks to dig up Rodenderry's skull and do nasty things to his skull, let's go directly to the Master of No-Talent Directing, Uwe Bol.