Slashdot Mirror


What Disney's Acquisition of Fox Means For the Future of Film and TV (qz.com)

Disney announced on Thursday it had reached a $52 billion deal to buy most of the assets of 21st Century Fox. It is "the biggest and most consequential media merger in an era of big and consequential media consolidation deals," reports Quartz. "The deal will have a lasting effect on film, television, and the internet." From the report: If the merger is approved, Disney will own: All of Fox's film studios (20th Century Fox, Fox Searchlight, and Fox 2000); Fox's television studio; FX Networks; National Geographic; Fox's stake in European broadcaster Sky; Fox's stake in North American streamer Hulu. Staying with the hollowed out 21st Century Fox is the Fox broadcast network, Fox News, Fox Sports, and Fox Business. With Fox's film and TV studios and its cable networks, Disney will acquire the rights to literally hundreds of popular television series and movies. (Some of which include Avatar, X-Men, Deadpool, Modern Family and The Simpsons.)

Imagine all of the properties mentioned above, plus all of Disney's existing franchises (Star Wars, Marvel, Pixar, etc.) combined into one internet streaming service. You won't have to imagine for long, because that's pretty much exactly why Disney CEO Bob Iger was so keen on buying all of Fox's biggest assets. Disney plans to release a streaming entertainment service in 2019. It would have been quite formidable on its own, even without Fox's help, but now it will likely be the first true rival to Netflix in the streaming space. Before today, Disney, Fox, and Comcast (NBCUniversal) all shared equal 30% stakes in Hulu (Time Warner owns 10%). But when Disney takes over Fox's share of the streaming service, it will own 60%, becoming a controlling majority owner, relegating Comcast to minority owner in the process.

20th Century Fox, we hardly knew ye. Okay, that may be a bit premature, but it's clear that Fox's film business won't be the same if the merger is approved. The deal marks the first time in modern history that one major film studio has purchased another, eliminating one of the "big six," and essentially giving Disney control of two-thirds of Hollywood. (The other four major movie studios are Universal, Warner Bros., Paramount, and Sony.)

22 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. Like Star Wars by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does that mean we can expect X-men: The Rip-off, Avatar: the Rip-off, etc?

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Like Star Wars by hazardPPP · · Score: 5, Funny

      It means you can expect X-Men on Ice!

    2. Re:Like Star Wars by Esteanil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Probably not. The most important part of this, however, is that Xenomorph XX121 (The alien from Alien, Aliens, etc) is now a Disney princess, as it was born by a queen and is owned by Disney.

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    3. Re:Like Star Wars by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Additionally Princess Sophia the First, was not born by a queen, she was simply an acquisition when her mom married King Roland II. The lore here is pretty convolution and basically boils down to "Can we sell your daughter a doll and/or a dress? Yes? Princess."

      So I dub Xenomorph XX121 Princess Sophia the Second, because my opinion is that King Roland II likes to play around and eventually Xenomorph's will get in his sights.

  2. Will Disney become the new Netflix? by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    DisneyFlix will only become a 'rival to Netflix' because Netflix is being forced to become less of an aggregator and more of a distributor of its own content. So Netflix will become worse and Disney will only fill the void for content owned by Disney. I'm not saying anything new here - but welcome to the world of paying for multiple streaming providers (or piracy).

    Perhaps its time to think about some form of compulsory copyright licenses (as per music on the radio, or cable retransmissions).

    1. Re:Will Disney become the new Netflix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      First, it's obvious the government should block this deal as the media is way too conglomerated as it is, which of course means the Trump admin will approve it wholeheartedly (not that immediate previous admins would have blocked it either).

      Second, Disney won't become netflix. Disney is way too greedy for that. It will do some type of tiered pricing bullshit and then add PPV on any streaming they serve and the basic will be real shit. But on top of that, I can guarantee they'll do commercials.

      Which isn't to say Netflix isn't in big trouble. It is. It should have taken a loan long ago, brought HBO for original programming long ago, and built on that with acquisitions of libraries rather than trying to build the library one by one. Now all content is in a bubble getting more and more expensive.

    2. Re:Will Disney become the new Netflix? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, people didn't pay for the 50 channels they wanted. They paid for the 50 shows they wanted. And this is not going to be any different. Be honest, all you "CBS all access" subscribers, who of you is watching anything other than STD? Possibly because of "I pay for it anyway, so I can just as well...", but NONE of these other formats is something you'd pay for.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Will Disney become the new Netflix? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which isn't to say Netflix isn't in big trouble. It is. It should have taken a loan long ago, brought HBO for original programming long ago, and built on that with acquisitions of libraries rather than trying to build the library one by one. Now all content is in a bubble getting more and more expensive.

      It's not clear that HBO was ever available for sale to Netflix. Instead of buying HBO, Netflix is simply copying them, and developing their own original content. It seems to me like they are doing exactly what they should be doing. New original content is worth more than old original content.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Will Disney become the new Netflix? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Disney released "Cars 3" this year and it didn't do well -- Disney doesn't have any new ideas.

      The Disney side of Disney is actually doing quite well. Coco, Moana, Frozen, etc were all smash hits, and were relatively original for the current landscape. Now, the Pixar side is falling back on its laurels a little, but it's hard to believe they're completely out of ideas.

      Disney's a giant conglomerate that owns a lot of franchises. Of course you're going to see sequels and variations of those franchises from them. But they're far from being a company that doesn't do original content, they seem to be better at that than they were in the past.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Will Disney become the new Netflix? by Notabadguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It was best to think about these things well before government allowed massive monopolies like this to even exist. Today, it's far too late. The cable cutters who felt they were getting ripped off with 50 channels of what they want bundled with 500 channels of shit they don't will now pay a dozen streaming providers for the 50 streaming channels of what they want bundled with 50,000 streaming channels of shit they don't. The only difference is your internet service and streaming costs will likely make cable seem like a bargain in the end.

      Speak for yourself.

      II'm doing more reading and playing more video games than in recent years. I've converted my library of DVDs into H.265 digital files, and we have plenty of entertainment content without having to subscribe to a procession of streaming services. I'm lazy. I'm too lazy to subscribe to multiple streaming services, follow up with which one has a show I might want to watch, pay multiple subscriptions...so I have a library of digital movies that have replaced my VHS and DVD physical copies, an occasional trip to the theater, an occasional pirate bay foray if my wife is desperate to see something - but other than that, alternative entertainment.

      How many other people are that kind of lazy? Not willing to deal with the hassle? Switching to a different mode of entertainment?

      Cable cutting isn't about cutting a cable subscription, then filling in X hours per week with alternate television programming found elsewhere. It's a viable option. Its more about cable as a failing entertainment medium - both in content and medium delivery (mounting costs and ads).

      I should think a lot of people are watching less TV. Polls say the younger generations certainly are.

    6. Re:Will Disney become the new Netflix? by fropenn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The merchandising for the Cars franchise has produced over $10 billion in sales. Cars 3 made money on its own, but it really served as an advertising avenue for the more profitable aspects of the business, such as the theme park, toys, branded clothing, etc. http://www.cartoonbrew.com/box...

  3. It will suck, like all other monopolies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They'll think they have you by the balls and not put any effort into making their streaming service customer friendly, i.e. support many devices, work reliably on a wide range of internet connections, etc. They'll make you pay for stuff you don't want to see by bundling it with stuff that you do want to see. The list goes on and on. Monopoly tactics.

  4. 52B by Danathar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Everybody is talking about what Disney is going to do with all that intellectual property, but what I want to know is what will the 52B be used for at what is left of Fox? Thatâ(TM)s a LOT of money. What Fox does with it will also be Major unless itâ(TM)s just pocketed by investors and stock holders.

  5. All your facts are far wrong by raymorris · · Score: 5, Informative

    > a) Netflix is worth $92 billion. Double of the Fox company Disney is buying.

    Fox has ten times the revenue and FORTY FIVE times the profit of Netflix. Netflix has hype that has generated speculative stock buys, and by every measure of fundamentals is *worth* a tiny fraction of that.

    > c) Disney's revenue is declining. Properties like ABC, people aren't watch tv as much.

    Disney's revenue has gone from $42B to $55B over the last five years. In the last ten years, every year has been a significant increase other than a dip in 2009, and 2017 was flat.

  6. What this means is... by Pollux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The deal marks the first time in modern history that one major film studio has purchased another, eliminating one of the "big six," and essentially giving Disney control of two-thirds of Hollywood. (The other four major movie studios are Universal, Warner Bros., Paramount, and Sony.)

    This means that, within the next two years, I guarantee you'll see another merger between the four other players.

    And all in the name of "competition", of course.

    1. Re:What this means is... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's the freakin' blob, another Hollywood invention.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  7. Coincidence? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

    If I was a full-time conspiracy theorist instead of just a part-timer, I'd say that the recent destruction of Net Neutrality in America was accomplished with this Disney acquisition in mind. As it is, I'll limit myself to noting that the timing is at least a little bit suspicious.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  8. Underestimating? by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Fox has ten times the revenue and FORTY FIVE times the profit of Netflix.

    Which won't mean dick if they have the wrong business model. I'm not pretending I can pick the winner here or making any sort of assertion about either companies chances but I think it would be foolish to underestimate Netflix. They've already put at least one much larger competitor in the grave (Blockbuster).

    1. Re:Underestimating? by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Which won't mean dick if they have the wrong business model. I'm not pretending I can pick the winner here or making any sort of assertion about either companies chances but I think it would be foolish to underestimate Netflix. They've already put at least one much larger competitor in the grave (Blockbuster).

      Yeah, except Netflix is - willingly or unwillingly - being forced into the traditional movie/TV production company model rather than being universal gateways like Spotify, Apple Music, Tidal etc. are for music. Like Disney got Frozen, Moana etc., HBO got GoT, Westworld etc., Netflix got The Crown, Stranger Things etc. and people buy the service because of that exclusive content. That's just a new competitor in an old market, not something revolutionary. Which I suppose could work okay like on Steam you buy one and one game, it's not like you buy a "Steam subscription". If you could shop content like that, but I expect that instead you'll have five different services with five different clients and five different quirks and none of the non-mainstream content. The one-stop "shop" will still be torrents...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  9. Why nobody thought of The Simpsons? by wwalker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So Simpsons are now owned by Disney? Boy, oh, boy! Since Fox has been a running joke in many Simpsons episodes, I can't wait to see what they come up with about their new overlords.

  10. Re:Imagine.... a repeats channel by EvilSS · · Score: 2

    So couple of things.
    1. CBS all access does have shows from other studios (WB for example) that air on CBS. Those Chuck Lorre comedies (BBT, Moms) are WB shows for example.
    2. You realize that Hulu is owned by Universal (Comcast), Fox, ABC (Disney), and WB right? So yes you can get shows from other networks, but those networks also own a stake in Hulu. You are still getting a service that only shows programs from it's owner's studios.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  11. THE BEST NEWS REGARDING THIS MERGER!!! by PortHaven · · Score: 2

    We will get to hear the trumpeting of the 21st Centery Fox theme prior to Star Wars again, on all the new releases. And probably on any future re-releases.