Slashdot Mirror


China Blocks Foreign Companies From Mapping Its Roads for Self-Driving Cars (thedrive.com)

The Chinese government is blocking foreign companies from mapping its roads in great detail, according to a Financial Times (paywalled) report. The restrictions, which reportedly do not apply to Chinese firms, are being instituted in the name of national security. China is concerned about spying. From a report: China has restricted the recording of geographic information for more than a decade because it believes giving other countries access to that information constitutes a security risk. Geographic surveys can't be performed without permission from the government, and many digital cameras don't record GPS coordinates for geotagging, as they do in other countries, according to Fortune.

110 comments

  1. Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If a car needs a detailed map to drive itself, instead of responding to visual cues like signs, curb position, road markings, then it's not truly "self driving." Self-driving cars should be able to follow maps of the level of detail given by (say) Google Maps -- they should be able to operate with GPS info and knowing how roads are "networked."

    1. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      they should be able to operate with GPS info and knowing how roads are "networked."

      Just like human drivers without maps and any knowledge of the neighborhood, right? Very efficient!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If a car needs a detailed map to drive itself, instead of responding to visual cues like signs, curb position, road markings, then it's not truly "self driving."

      The more clues it has, the better. This applies to humans also.

      But the bigger issue here is unfair competition: local firms get extra info that foreign firms don't. Being we have a huge trade gap, partly because of this kind of favoritism, I hope the Trump administration makes an issue out of it and threatens sanctions.

      This is the kind of thing voters hoped Trump would focus on, instead of Twitter fights with athletes. He used to always rail against China's trade practices. Let's hope the Good Trump comes out instead of the Distracted Trump.

    3. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "If a car needs a detailed map to drive itself, instead of responding to visual cues like signs, curb position, road markings, then it's not truly "self driving."

      What it if it doesn't 'need', what if it just 'benefits from' it?

      I mean, are you personally better at driving on streets that you know? You know which lights are stupid, the road with really bad potholes, you know about the blind driveway on the corner of X, you know that there's a school at Z where kids are often playing. You know there's always a lineup that backs out onto the road from the starbucks at Q between 7am and 9am, and that the construction at F is makes left turns hard, etc. You know every driveway, twist, turn, and ramp, and elevation change, where its safe to pass, where its safe to pull over, where to get gas, where to park.

      Are you really just as comfortable looking at an out of date map for a city you've never been to?

      You don't need the extra information, but it sure helps.

    4. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      But the bigger issue here is unfair competition: local firms get extra info that foreign firms don't

      So, you'd be OK with a Chinese company doing detailed mapping of US military bases?

      And, really, let's be honest ... the entire US foreign policy/trade policy is "America First" and is entirely built on American exceptionalism and local firms getting a leg up.

      What you'll have to learn is in tandem to the notion of American Exceptionalism is the rest of the world not giving a fuck and refusing to treat you like spoiled children who feel entitled to a better deal.

      America is well on its way to being insufferable pricks you might find nobody cares about propping up your ego. And Trump with his small hands and tiny brain might have to realize that "no, the rest of the world has no interest in buying your stuff if you're going to be assholes, and we're certainly not giving you sweatheart deals based on your charming personality".

      Trump is already telling the world that he's fixing to the do very same thing. And we're all getting ready to just "fuck off and go away, America".

      I'm not sure Americans fully appreciate the extent to which China already owns much of your economy. So good luck with those sanctions.

    5. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

      trump can not, nor will, make an issue out of this.
      So far, trump has shown more favortism towards china and russia than either W or O. Hell, he PROMISED to stop China's dumping and once his kids got their IP from china, he turned china into his best friends, while they are laughing at what a traitor Trump is.

      But, CHina will crack down further in a short bit and prevent any western car maker from having self-driving vehicles in CHina. They really are a danger esp. since CHina is in a cold war with the west.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emo Luke becomes a force ghost. Kylo cuts Snoke in half. Yoda shows up as a puppet. The end.

    7. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by kaatochacha · · Score: 2

      The original article is on China not letting anyone other than themselves use maps of their roads.
      You morphed it into a diatribe on how much you hate America.
      It sounds as if you are the one with a problem. Do restaurant menus remind you how much you hate America?
      Does looking at a tree remind you of your awesome dislike of the USA?
      I would imagine, at parties, you're the annoying "Avoid that guy, all he does is bitch about America" guy, standing alone in the corner, fuming.

    8. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a car needs a detailed map to drive itself, instead of responding to visual cues like signs, curb position, road markings, then it's not truly "self driving." Self-driving cars should be able to follow maps of the level of detail given by (say) Google Maps -- they should be able to operate with GPS info and knowing how roads are "networked."

      I agree up to a point. Self driving cars should be able to drive along a road without hitting things based on a simple direction such as drive South for 4 miles based on odometer, a compass and sensors and algorithms to keep it on the road and prevent it from hitting things.

      So a self driving car should be able to drive safely in a given direction without detailed maps, but navigation is different than driving safely. Human drivers either use a map or a local "mental map" that can utilize landmarks and such. However, if I say "take me to South Street in City XYZ" then I would expect both a person and a self driving car to need a map to plan a route and I would expect some reliance on GPS to find the current location as a starting point. Otherwise, the driver is going to have to manually input that starting address.

      Versus "drive me a mile south of here" which should simply need a compass and an identifiable road within sensor range that roughly went South without a map.

    9. Re: Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2

      I am many things, but certainly not a Trump voter, but I am starting to feel some tit-for-tat is necessary. If the Chinese block access to foreign firms or increase levies, while their companies get free reign both at home and internationally, then something is wrong.

      A policy should be instated indicating that if a foreign nation provides unfair access, then the same should be coming. At the same time if we already do create unfair barriers, then we should accept that is fair game another country will to do so for the same products.

      If you want access to an open market, then you need to be playing by the same rules or risk getting penalised in the same way.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    10. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      So, you'd be OK with a Chinese company doing detailed mapping of US military bases?

      No, but IF the US gov't says military-related roads are off-limits to commercial mapping systems, then they should be off-limits to ALL commercial mapping systems, regardless of country of owners or headquarters.

      policy is "America First" and is entirely built on American exceptionalism and local firms getting a leg up.

      Every other country favors local firms. The US should either follow suit or crack down on such practices with tariffs etc. Some economists say "free trade" is beneficial even if one side cheats. I have to disagree, for one it contributes to bubbles because one kind of asset builds up under lopsided trade. Plus, it can create risk during military conflicts:

      I'm not sure Americans fully appreciate the extent to which China already owns much of your economy. So good luck with those sanctions.

      That's just why we have to balance things out. Nobody wants another country to have them by the economic balls. Thanks for making my point for me.

      I think all countries should make sure trade is reasonably balanced. That advice is not about an East-vs-West battle.

    11. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      needing to have mapped out lanes for interchanges is bad vs being able to read markings / sings on the fly.

    12. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I don' think Trump cares because it doesn't matter..

      IF you somehow think that having access to the road networks in China is of some importance to the USA, I can assure you that it's not. Most folks in Chia don't have the resources to buy a car to start with and most that do live in the city and don't need one. Self Driving cars are of almost zero importance to them. They won't buy them, so who cares about this?

      Now if you think there is some military reason to have China's road networks clearly mapped and Trump should care for this reason... I'm willing to bet that the military already knows what it needs to know about this...

      So that leaves only one possible reason you would bash Trump on this.. You think the USA should be involved in trying to check the Chinese and your perceived abuses of civil rights. I dare say that Trump's perspective on this is pretty clear from his campaign rhetoric, where he doesn't think the USA is the world's police force unless it involves a compelling national interest. I don't see a compelling national interest here..

      So why are you bashing Trump on this issue?

      Let me guess.. You are sore he won the election and is now president...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    13. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      Just like human drivers without maps and any knowledge of the neighborhood, right? Very efficient!

      Before people took snapshots of their dinner and pasted it over the internet, getting lost was easily the most effective way to find the best restaurants.

      Younger generations will never know the joy of pulling over, hanging out the window and begging for directions.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    14. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Terwin · · Score: 1

      And, really, let's be honest ... the entire US foreign policy/trade policy is "America First" and is entirely built on American exceptionalism and local firms getting a leg up.

      What you'll have to learn is in tandem to the notion of American Exceptionalism is the rest of the world not giving a fuck and refusing to treat you like spoiled children who feel entitled to a better deal.

      American Exceptionalism has nothing to do with interactions with any other country, it is merely an exploration of how and why some little upstart nothing of a country managed to go from a deceleration of independence in 1776 to one of the top 2 world powers in 1976.
      Other countries have been around for hundreds of years longer, so it it not the age. The individual people are no different from people anywhere else in the world, so it is not the people. Other countries in the Americas were not greatly impacted by the world wars, etc.

      In the end, the only thing really exceptional about the United States are the core tenants of freedom and liberty enshrined in our founding documents and, more importantly, respected by our political leaders. This releases the human potential of the american citizen to be as great as their talents and skills allow.

    15. Re: Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just ran through a whole list of static conditions best described by a fixed map that doesn't change much at all from week to week. Good job confirming what you presumably wanted to rebut.

    16. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at google maps then you see that maps and satellite images for China can easily be half a kilometer offset. Not to mention that maps are often incomplete or severely outdated. Western companies including Google just don't have access to good cartographic data on China. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if China itself didn't have a good handle on its own maps. Sure the car must be able to drive safely regardless, but its a bit much to expect it to find a path to destination without proper maps.

    17. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      American Exceptionalism has nothing to do with interactions with any other country

      Except your peckerwood of a president is pretty much trying to do exactly that.

      In the end, the only thing really exceptional about the United States are the core tenants of freedom and liberty enshrined in our founding documents and, more importantly, respected by our political leaders

      Aww, how cute, you guys still believe that is what is happening.

      You should pay attention to the news a little closer ... Trump doesn't know about, or give a fuck about, your Constitution. Neither did Bush the lesser, not have several of your last Attorneys General, or your police forces. And the ever powerful religious right is no better than the Taliban in terms of wanting to impose their beliefs on everybody.

      Those core tenets (not tenants) are being ignored left, right, and center.

      America is well on its way to being an oligarchy which serves only the interests of corporations, the wealthy, and a specific kind of Christian. Stop pretending any of the rest of that stuff still holds true.

      This releases the human potential of the american citizen to be as great as their talents and skills allow.

      Well, by which you mean their whiteness, wealth, and degree to which the interests of the wealthy and corporations actually includes not abandoning your poor broke ass to fend for yourself.

      The American meritocracy is a myth, and in many ways, it always has been.

    18. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by dfm3 · · Score: 1

      ...and knowing how roads are "networked."

      So maybe they'd need a database of information about the locations of roads and how they're connected to one another... say, a map?

    19. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do get detailed maps. Google sells map data. So does Google. So does everyone else in the business of collecting customer data from locatable wifi and gps enabled devices. It's especially fun when one part of the company refuses to admit the actual name of the client to other parts of the company. It's even funnier when you look at the visa status of the employees with access to the most potentially sensitive data.

      And yes, the Chinese hosted data centers have access to the SSL keys on proxy servers for man-in-the-middle attacks of HTTPS connections from the portable applications. So do the US and European data centers.

    20. Re: Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      ...satellite images for China can easily be half a kilometer offset. Not to mention that maps are often incomplete or severely outdated. Western companies including Google just don't have access to good cartographic data on China

      This stream of words with no actual thinking involved is rather amusing.

    21. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of thing voters hoped Trump would focus on, instead of Twitter fights with athletes. He used to always rail against China's trade practices. Let's hope the Good Trump comes out instead of the Distracted Trump.

      Unfortunately Trump badly misunderstands the realities of the situation with North Korea. China has somewhat more leverage than it will use and but not as much as western governments assume. Neither Russia nor China want the North Korean problem resolved at all. China doesn't really want things to get worse, but they do enjoy seeing the USA reeling about what to do there, as does Russia. Neither country really wants anything to happen that makes the US stronger. Having the US distracted by a minor power is good for both Russia and China in a lot of ways. So because Trump seems to truly believe that China can solve his problem for him, he won't do much to piss them off. Sure there will be some possible arms sales to Taiwan but previous presidents have done that anyway. He's not going to push much on trade with China. Maybe in domestic appearances he'll blast them and their practices for sound bites, but in the end he's not going to really do much or anything about it because he still thinks China is willing to solve his North Korean problem for him. As long as he believes that, his hands will be tied.

    22. Re: Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      certainly not a Trump voter, but I am starting to feel some tit-for-tat is necessary

      Well, Trump doesn't really believe in tit-for-tat either.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    23. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I am not American and you can be sure I am not the previous AC. Yet I still think it the same way as he does. It does not mean I hate America, it is that I only understand the right for one whichever country to have a policy of prioritising local companies for geographical information of its own territory.
      So once again, I see no problem at all with the article on China not letting anyone other than itself use maps of their roads. I would do exactly the same. And yes, I alone would capitalise on this resource, a resource of my country. And then sell it to the others, of course if they want it.

      Getting back to America, well no I don't hate it, as I mentioned above. But one thing is sure and clear for all the non-America part of the World: That America has the highest levels of 'prick', 'spoiled' and 'arrogant' elements in the people it produces. And as there same space for elements in a human being is the same for everyone, this excess in the above elements is compensated by very low levels of education and generic critical thinking.

      Now get off my lawn.

    24. Re: Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the Chinese block access to foreign firms or increase levies, while their companies get free reign both at home and internationally, then something is wrong.

      Then what was all that a few years ago about Huawei, ZTE and a couple of other chinese companies not allowed to sell products in America? Something that had to do with national security I remember. How easily can you buy Huawei, ZTE, XiaoMi, Meizu cellular phones?
      Speaking about tit-for-tat anyways.

    25. Re: Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Your post makes no sense.

    26. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know there is such a thing as "both," don't you?

    27. Re: Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How easily can you buy Huawei, ZTE, XiaoMi, Meizu cellular phones?

      I just checked all four of the brands you listed and you can buy them all on amazon quite easily. I'm guessing you weren't trying.

    28. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don' think Trump cares because it doesn't matter..

      IF you somehow think that having access to the road networks in China is of some importance to the USA, I can assure you that it's not. Most folks in Chia don't have the resources to buy a car to start with and most that do live in the city and don't need one. Self Driving cars are of almost zero importance to them. They won't buy them, so who cares about this?

      Lets say "most folks in Chia"[sic] don't have the resources; Or around 700 Million people. That still leaves more people than the entire population of the US.

      However you really aren't getting this. The end prize is still the markets outside China. The market inside China just provides a nursery pool where the Chinese companies can cheaply develop products with no restrictions to stop the using short cuts such as not paying for their patents.

      Now if you think there is some military reason to have China's road networks clearly mapped and Trump should care for this reason... I'm willing to bet that the military already knows what it needs to know about this...

      So that leaves only one possible reason you would bash Trump on this.. You think the USA should be involved in trying to check the Chinese and your perceived abuses of civil rights. I dare say that Trump's perspective on this is pretty clear from his campaign rhetoric, where he doesn't think the USA is the world's police force unless it involves a compelling national interest. I don't see a compelling national interest here..

      And here we have the strawman. And yet it's a very interesting strawman. I can think of many reasons he could believe this. Maybe he believes my argument above? Maybe he believes that, where there are fewer vehicles the market for modern cars will be bigger (in the same way as mobile phones in China overtook the USA because they have fewer fixed lines)? Maybe he's crazy paranoid? Maybe he has some information you don't? Maybe he believes that China will overtake the USA economy in the next few years? Strangely, though, you can only come up with one possible explanation. Could that perhaps be because you have an agenda?

      So why are you bashing Trump on this issue?

      Let me guess.. You are sore he won the election and is now president...

      Ah yes. Trump is not your friend. Even if you are earning some pittance to shill for him, he's still not working in your interests. Trump cares about Trump. And if you are some kind of Chinese / Russian troll supporting Trump just to weaken America, you are even crazier.

    29. Re: Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the guy who has never been to the United States and has never spoken face to face with someone from the United States.

      LOL

      You = Miserable
      Miserable People = Failures

    30. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by afidel · · Score: 1

      China is the worlds largest car market, outstripping both North America and the EU. Heck China is almost big as the EU and North America combined (24M vs 32M (15+17))

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    31. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The Chinese already slashed import taxes on certain imported goods from 17% to 7% after Trump's visit to Beijing. Did we not hear that? He already did something, but your news didn't report it (surprise).

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    32. Re: Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Our entire relationship with China since deciding to admit them to the WTO back in the 90s has been "unfettered access to the gigantically profitable US market while you're free to heap restrictions on American companies and ruinous tariffs on American goods." How do you think China accumulated those hundreds of billions in US treasuries? They made a shit-ton of money and could keep their home markets safe from ruthlessly competitive US firms. It's a far stretch to say that this should change now, US policy since WWII has been based on open access to its markets while other countries are free to disadvantage US goods.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    33. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you ever heard that China is a member of WTO and fair competition? If you don't know, then ignore all I'm going to say.
      The policy to protect their market is against WTO rules and China has promised to the WTO members to open their market, which including the telecom, bank, food/drug, energy, transportation, etc. when they joined WTO. But 15 years has passed, they did not keep their promise and now they make more rules to protect their own market again. So where is the fair competition? If all the countries in WTO do what China have been doing, can the WTO be still exist in the next 5, 10, 15 years?

    34. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      More accurately, western companies are free to use Baidu Maps. It's just that Google etc. are but allowed to create detailed maps.

      It's a big problem, no doubt. Even for foreigners traveling in China, they can't get good English maps. For developers the English documentation is lacking.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    35. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      They can get busted in a given country IF a gov't forbids collecting, using, and/or selling such for maps and location services. Whether Google specifically is cheating or not, I cannot say.

    36. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That America has the highest levels of 'prick', 'spoiled' and 'arrogant' elements in the people it produces.

      We are not blocking the sea by making up maritime laws and censoring our citizens from political discussions and complaints. Prick that!

    37. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this any different than the US not allowing Chinese companies to buy up western navigation and mapping companies?

      E.g. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-26/chinese-bid-for-stake-in-here-maps-denied-by-u-s-security-panel

    38. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human drivers can figure out how to get somewhere with regular detail, they don't need the extra detail that so-called "self driving" cars apparently need.

      If this difference in detail needed is not solved, the excuse for the first pedestrian run over by a self driving car will be "the map was not up to date, it showed the pedestrian located on the sidewalk, not in the zebra crossing".

    39. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to touch and love your butt

    40. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even people can't drive with the details given by google maps.

    41. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very easy when you have no neighbors or enemies and hide away for the first half of a world war, and then profiteer on the aftermath. That distance and money advantage is dwindling now thanks to technology, America will be in a world of trouble without its lucky advantages of geography.

    42. Re: Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes perfect sense to people. Maybe your AI needs more training data?

    43. Re:Then the cars aren't truly self-driving by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      That's nice and all, but what happens when you plug in a location (i.e. address, name of location, etc) and the software has no idea where the fuck that even is?

  2. FIRST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they even have cars there?

  3. yandex is THE search engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for asian prons
    google cant compete

  4. The Reason Is Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese have such tiny penises; apologies to South Park

    1. Re:The Reason Is Simple by GerardAtJob · · Score: 1

      In fact, after reading your comment, I searched and here is the results :

      Average size :
      China - 4.287 in
      Japan - 4.299 in

      --
      I can't call that English ;-)
    2. Re:The Reason Is Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whereas with your giant prolapsed anus, multiple giant socialist donkey-dongs fit with ease as you're used to being fucked over by the state...

  5. Sounds like a hint for the NSA, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like the US blowing up ball-bearing factories in WWII. Germans didn't really use them, but golly the US did. They thought it was strategic, but it was just a disclosure of their own weakness.

    This sounds like food for thought for 3-letter agencies, and non-compete agencies, and such.

    Saying "don't map here" and then doping it 200 to 1 with uniform random meaningless chunks and enforcing those, might have been able to make the foreign companies make great models for China's lack of IP to basically rob and use internally. It might have created barriers that reduced the competition, and it likely still would keep whatever super-secret super-secret secret. They could also require all maps to be shared with the Chinese government.

    Now they just painted a big target on it saying "find me" at the cost of growth, exfiltration of world-class technology to local companies, practical experience at characterizing utility of maps, and lack of their nation-state competitors knowing at least one battlefield seem like bigger losses.

    But who am I to pretend to think...

    1. Re:Sounds like a hint for the NSA, and... by Drethon · · Score: 1

      One modern spy sat fly over could probably do more than a year of on the ground mapping.

    2. Re:Sounds like a hint for the NSA, and... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Commercial mapping attempts might be front companies for the GCHQ and NSA. Roads near mil and gov sites get all their digital and staff data collected.
      Every phone, face and road. MI6 and the CIA then have a larger database of staff working at mil sites to try and make an offer to buy secrets.
      How to stop Western intelligence services setting up front companies and doing collect it all?
      Just keep them all out. Mil sites and staff are safe from new road level collection methods.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  6. google maps does not even line up right in china by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    google maps does not even line up right in china.

    It's like there forced to be off a bit.

  7. This is normal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what any country that takes national security matters seriously would normally do.

  8. Really? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Like those that do keep the Chinese government up at night already have street locations, map locations, base locations, population patterns, and traffic flow patterns? It's laughable how the Chinese want the planet to believe how late to the dance they are.

    Maybe it's even simpler, How much does Google want to pay?

  9. and data roaming fees can add up fast with that by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and data roaming fees can add up fast with that (your car is locked to ATT that will be up to $15/meg in canada)

  10. Re:Really?-bad maps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remember we're the ones that bombed the Chinese embassy due to faulty maps.

  11. Which Tells a Lot About Their Spying Tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China's spies (political or industrial) face no such restrictions. Not exactly an even playing field.

  12. Shades of Stalin by mykepredko · · Score: 4, Informative

    Reading this reminded me of Stalin ordered that the Soviet Union never published accurate maps of the country for fear of spying/invasion/bombing. This went on until the USSR's break up.

    Not surprisingly, Stalin ordered the creation of very detailed maps of the rest of the world to aid in spying/invasion/bombing: https://www.wired.com/2015/07/...

    1. Re:Shades of Stalin by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      not really. China did the same back in the 50s forward. Their maps did not line up either.
      And you can bet that China is about to block Tesla from getting information from their vehicles. After all, they ARE mapping out the roads.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Shades of Stalin by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Reading this reminded me of Stalin ordered that the Soviet Union never published accurate maps of the country for fear of spying/invasion/bombing. This went on until the USSR's break up.

      Not surprisingly, Stalin ordered the creation of very detailed maps of the rest of the world to aid in spying/invasion/bombing:

      Well there was a time where this mattered you had to send spy planes and shit. These days anything as large as a road is trivially mapped out by satellite images, hell you even got commercial satellites like WorldView-3 with a 0.31m (12 inch) resolution. It's a fair assumption that the US military got even better stuff. Granted, you might claim the horizontal view from a car will tell you more I doubt it's really for that kind of security. For one, it's a way to make domestic companies take the Chinese market which benefits China economically. Second, and probably more importantly it's China who'll get all the data on how the Chinese go by car. Just like they control the Internet, facial recognition in public etc. they're building what the USSR/DDR never could, a system where they really have eyes and ears everywhere.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Shades of Stalin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know there are plenty of Teslas already driving around in China don't you. They don't all ride donkeys like you seem to believe.

  13. Protection for Local Buisnesses by Ayano · · Score: 1

    This is a typical China play. In addition they have full control of the data which they won't if they let foreign companies do it.

    --
    I don't read AC
    1. Re:Protection for Local Buisnesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still better than typical American play. The US makes mapping companies fuzz out areas of other nations.

    2. Re:Protection for Local Buisnesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true, that's why chinese companies can't go global. Protectionism hits them back. (Unless ofc they buy out foreign firms.) We will never see chinese volkswagen, apple or coca-cola company.

  14. National security for China? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Maybe more of a national security issue in China's eyes.

  15. Re:google maps does not even line up right in chin by dwheeler · · Score: 2, Informative

    China indeed forces geographic data to be "off" a little bit compared to the rest of the world. For more information, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... in particularly the discussion on the GCJ-02 datum (colloquially Mars Coordinates).

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
  16. smart on CHina's part by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    China is very much in a cold war with the west (and is winning). The ability to map the streets and then have a self-driving car with multiple cameras,move around, means that these vehicles can be used for weapons,but also for spying on what is happening.
    As such, I fully expect china to block ANY self-driving western company car from China. Likewise, the west would be very wise to follow their steps on this.After all, China is just as likely to use their manufactured buses and vehicles as weapons and spy devices as well.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:smart on CHina's part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why make it a war? China and the US are mostly friends. And as a former resident of China, how it is possibly winning? US is much more powerful on just about every level.

      Anyway, winning, what the fuck? This would have been an effective government policy in the 90s. Now it's just bureaucratic BS from an incredibly out-of-touch government. Of course all this information can easily be taken from a combination of satellites, people on the ground, and data mining.

    2. Re:smart on CHina's part by PPH · · Score: 1

      Why make it a war?

      Because it's friendly competition if it's between equal parties in the marketplace. Once the state steps in to back one player, it becomes war.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:smart on CHina's part by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >The ability to map the streets and then have a self-driving car with multiple cameras, move around, means that these vehicles can be used for weapons,

      Well, it certainly means you don't have to recruit as many drivers for bombing missions. Still, that's more of a domestic terror threat than a foreign invasion threat - and I'd expect terrorists to co-opt local self-driving vehicles so they don't have to buy them themselves.

      As for mapping, I'm pretty sure any nation that can put a satellite in orbit can get a very up-to-date road map any time they want (subject to some small delay and greater difficulty as you get closer to the poles and overhead passes become more challenging).

    4. Re:smart on CHina's part by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      China and Russia are spending a TON of money on space-based weapons. They are not allowed to, but, they do not care about treaties. While W broke one, at least he said that he was breaking it.
      China is working hard on being able to take our America's sats, and China is counting on America taking out China's. That is why China is working on developing nuke powered drones that can fly around 100K' in the air and just quietly relay pix, comms and then finally lasering away.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:smart on CHina's part by WindBourne · · Score: 0

      I do not make it war. The average Chinese person is not at war with America, Americans, the west, or westerners. The fact is, that the average CHinese person just wants to live a normal life and have a good time the same as anybody else. I admire the hard work that the average Chinese does towards that goal.
      It is the CHinese GOV that is in a war with the west. They desire to remain in power, not just of China, but ideally, of the world. Right now, they are taking on Japan, S. Korea, Phillipines, Vietnam, and India. They would have invaded all of these nations fully except that would mean a HOT war with America which they are not ready for. However, they are preparing for not only a hot war, but many of their generals and leaders believe that a nuclear war IS winnable. As such, MAD is not going to work to contain both of us. However, if you look carefully at what CHina is up to, you can see that they are headed towards a nuke first strike on America and will then likely offer Europe a chance to stay out of it (like Hitler did with USSR) in hopes of splitting us apart.

      And CHina's gov desperately needs the west to not know what they are up to fully. For example, we know that they had over 3000 miles of underground tunneling that was no less than 8 lanes wide (i.e. 4 lanes in each direction) AND they have multiple labs/factories along it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:smart on CHina's part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you smoking to come up with these wild conspiracy theories? China is planning a first strike on the US? For what purpose? So they can get back irradiated treasuries? What could the possible benefit be? Mushroom clouds all over the globe. You have gone full retard on this one. More so than usual.

    7. Re:smart on CHina's part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus you are thick, China only did it after the US did it first, just to show that they could also. Of course only bad when China did it.
      Anyone who can launch a satellite can take them out, it's not exactly hard.

    8. Re:smart on CHina's part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing can fly at 100 km because there isn't enough air. Unlike your head which seems to be full of it.

    9. Re:smart on CHina's part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is obviously why the OP said 100K', which is 100,000 FEET.
      Appears to be the one full of it are Chinese astroturfers like you.
      They do not teach you Chinese to read English. Tell your comrade boss to send you back to first grade.

  17. Camera's can't see the roads anyway due to smog by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Take a left at the smog-obscured road, then continue for 3 miles, veering right of the smog-obscured fork.

    1. Re:Camera's can't see the roads anyway due to smog by plopez · · Score: 1

      That's why cars need radar. We'll soon be back to that libertarian paradise of the 50's where the smog is too thick to see and thousands die due to pollution.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Camera's can't see the roads anyway due to smog by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >We'll soon be back to that libertarian paradise of the 50's where the smog is too thick to see and thousands die due to pollution.

      Interesting thought (at least to me) - could there be a market for a night club where there's a (non-hazardous) artificial fog specifically to limit visibility so cameras are ineffective beyond a few feet?

    3. Re:Camera's can't see the roads anyway due to smog by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I mean, why should clean air be free? If clean air is such a valuable thing, people should have to pay for it.

  18. Re:google maps does not even line up right in chin by charliemerritt03 · · Score: 1

    Doesn't line up - I wondered about an area I discovered in a foreign country I lived in. About a 2KM X 1KM area where about half of GPS units consistently read about 1KM EAST of reality. The other half of units I tested were spot on - consistently. This area was near my home so I got a lot of neighbors to try it. 50-50. This persisted years. Why?

  19. Re:What about bump stocks that ban themselves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monday coffee is always the best, toodles.

  20. I know where I'm buying my next camera from by ad454 · · Score: 1

    China...

    Geographic surveys can't be performed without permission from the government, and many digital cameras don't record GPS coordinates for geotagging, as they do in other countries, according to Fortune.

    This sounds like a critical privacy feature, which is lacking in non-Chinese cameras.

    1. Re:I know where I'm buying my next camera from by magarity · · Score: 1

      I normally keep the GPS tagging turned off in my camera but the next trip to China it's going to stay on the whole time. That'll show 'em.

  21. Re:google maps does not even line up right in chin by plopez · · Score: 1

    Ask the Illuminati

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  22. Tariffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In a previous generation, this would be handled with tariffs. No wonder we can't negotiate a trade deal for shit. The Chinese know we don't have the backbone to actually impose tariffs and restrictions on their trade. We are toothless and the Chinese are eating our lunch. This country needs to have its balls reattached.

    1. Re:Tariffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a previous generation, this would be handled with tariffs.

      I think that is an excellent idea ... specifically, the rest of the world should slap tariffs on American goods with high fructose corn syrup which is largely paid for with huge farm subsidies that the US doesn't want anybody else to use, as well as imposing a carbon tax on the value of your goods so you don't get to compete unfairly by deciding to say "fuck, we're just gonna pollute".

      Oh, what's that, princess? It would be unfair if someone imposed tariffs on US goods? Sorry, but America is incredibly protectionistic, and is hardly one to play fair -- when your own industry can't compete you just try to add fees to those of other countries.

      See, what you Americans forget is this is a two way street. And China could always sell of their bonds and tank your dollar, since China owns much of your foreign debt.

      But don't go around acting like the US give a fuck about fair, free, or open trade according to some civilized set of rules. Because that's a fucking lie.

  23. detailed maps vs super mapped roads by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    detailed maps (like google maps) vs super mapped roads (street view with all signs, curb position, road markings mapped out and updated all the time)
    Right now street view can be 1+ years out of date.

  24. The embassy with stealth fighter debris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remember we're the ones that bombed the Chinese embassy due to faulty maps.

    Right. It was just a coincidence that debris from the F-117 Stealth Fighter recently shot down were in there.

  25. Calling BS on this by cmaurand · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to know what the Chinese are attempting to hide from the satellite mapping of their roads that has already been done by the US Military, The Russian military and any other military that has a spy satellite in orbit. Their roads and streets are already mapped by everyone and their brother.

    1. Re:Calling BS on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An in addition to that: those precious Chinese high quality maps will end up in commercially available cars. 1 day later the NSA will extract the maps from one of those cars and correlate that info with the satellite based maps. If it is on the satellite map, but not in the car's map, it is "of interest".

      As usual for China, national security includes economical advantages. We should know by now that there is no such thing as a Chinese company. There is only China.

  26. Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck the commi bastards. I refuse to buy anything from china I can by from another country of origin. How could we be so blind to give them so much for cheap labor, what we gave up is inexcusable

  27. Re: Really?-bad maps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No other country even had the capability to try that bombing strike. Sure, the US forces made the mistake. China wasn't even capble of trying.

  28. Re:Really?-bad maps. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Poor A/C the maps were very accurate; you're ignoring that this planet rotates, and moves around the sun. Not the other way around. LOL

  29. Re: The joys they'll never know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like having their hubcaps stolen a
    while asking for directions? Sure thing Griswold.

  30. What does this say about their offensive plans? by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    People worry about the things that they would think of doing to others being done to them.

    So, if they are afraid of others having detailed plans of any streets, not just specific areas, it stands to reason that they make use of detailed plans of the streets of their neighbors in their own offensive plans.

    People marching don't need detailed plans. What kind of attack would benefit from detailed plans of everything as opposed to just detailed plans of specific targets? Maybe they plan some fully automated, massive, ground-based, modern blitzkrieg?

  31. This is an easy fix by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    If China won't allow foreign competition in China, we simply don't allow Chinese Competition in $country until they do.

    If I were to wager a guess, it's less about National Security than it is the inability to manipulate a foreign business like they do their own.

  32. Re: The joys they'll never know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do cars even use hubcaps anymore?

  33. You guys don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want to give to their Chinese national companies a chance to become competitive against international companies. This will be always happening as the world accept two different rules, e.g.: To invest here in China you must share the technology, for we learn, copy and use as we please, but in you country we reserve the right to open out business and practice predatory prices and do whatever we want do.
    I don't think they are wrong, we are the wrong ones that allow it and this will just get worse.

  34. Devils advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it possible that China cares more about privacy than the U.S. and that their blocking of Google and other social networks might be a good thing? If they only didn't put spyware in there own stuff, it sounds like a privacy advocate's paradise. Many of us would like to see Facebook go away but if the government had to get involved to make it happen, we'd all cry "attack on free speech." The real problem is, money talks and China has 1 billion untapped data dollars walking around with no geo tagging. Their government directs their media and large corporations direct ours. One is just being more honest than the other about it. Ours just has to filter through Google to squeeze a dollar before being handed over to an intelligence agency. We are completely reliant on the EULA to honor anonymous data collection as a "proxy" before it's scrapped.

    1. Re: Devils advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, if any found misspellings and grammar issues are your only counter argument, just shut the F### up...

  35. Good luck with that. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

    All you need a few thousand people driving around with a phone GPS phone mapping app and you'll have all the detailed maps you need.

  36. Re:What about bump stocks that ban themselves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why voted down? Much better read than the rant about HOSTS file being an antivirus and the Jewiss^H^H^H^HCatholic banking conspiracy. LOL, not realizing that host file implementations all go back to BSD or the like.

  37. Shortly irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Self driving cars by definition must adapt to local conditions using SLAM algorithms. With multi-GNSS to deal with jamming/spoofing (GPS/Beidou/SLONASS/Galileo), and the coming newspace companies with high resolution daily satellite photography and SAR height mapping, denying map data is a mild annoyance where it can be acquired elsewhere. This, coupled with the cars sharing their own acquired data (not an active mapping operation per se, so can send back to the mothership), means such regulation is largely for naught.

  38. good example.. by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    And that's why self-driving cars should really be selfdriving and not having to rely on any extra maps.